Essentials in Church History
Smith to the Present Time (1922), with Introductory Chapters on the
Antiquity of the Gospel and the “Falling Away”
Twelve, and Church Historian
Published by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day
Saints
Salt Lake City, Utah
Deseret News Press
1922
Copyright
1922, by Heber J. Grant, Trustee-in-Trust for the Church of Jesus Christ
of Latter-day Saints.
Electronic edition produced by the Mormon Texts Project.
Volunteers who helped with this book: Eric Heaps,
Meridith Crowder, Byron Clark, Jean-Michel Carter, Tod Robbins, Ben
Crowder, Stephen Bruington, Benjamin Bytheway.
Version 1.0
Preface
The need of a history of the Church in one volume that
can be used for general reading, and at the same time meet the
requirements of a text-book in the priesthood quorums, Church schools and
auxiliary organizations, for a long time has been recognized. In the
preparation of this volume, all these requirements have been given
thoughtful consideration. As the title of the book,
Essentials in Church History, implies, the vital and essential points
of history and doctrine have been selected, and as far as possible,
arranged in chronological order. The doctrines and revelations given to
the Prophet Joseph Smith have been interwoven with the main story of the
history in a manner, it is hoped, that will prove to be both interesting
and instructive to the casual reader, as well as to the careful student.
Moreover, the work has been prepared with the desire that the arrangement
of the material will stimulate in the reader a zeal for further research
and study of other and more extensive histories, particularly the Documentary History of the Church, in six volumes, which
covers the period of the life of the Prophet Joseph Smith.
It is impossible to give, in one volume, in detail all
the important incidents in the history of the Church. However, this volume
is sent forth on its mission with the hope that it will answer fully the
purpose for which it was written.
Grateful appreciation is hereby acknowledged for
invaluable assistance given by Dr. John A. Widtsoe, of the council of the
twelve, in the preparation of the manuscript. I also desire to express
sincere thanks to Elders Edward H. Anderson, J. M. Sjodahl, Andrew
Jenson, August William Lund and others, who have so willingly and
cheerfully assisted in the preparation of the work.
Joseph Fielding Smith
Table of
Contents
Part One — Introductory: The Gospel in Ancient
and Mediaeval Times
Part Two — Opening of the Dispensation of the
Fulness of Times
Part Three — The Ohio and Missouri Period
Part Four — The Nauvoo Period
Part Five — The Settlement in the Rocky
Mountains
Part Six — Recent Development
Appendix
Part One
Introductory: The Gospel in Ancient and Mediaeval
Times
Chapter 1
The Gospel Older than the Law
From the time of the exodus from Egypt until the advent
of Jesus Christ the Israelites were subject to the laws given to Moses.
The belief is held by many that when the Savior supplanted these laws with
the Gospel it was the first appearance among men of that great plan of
salvation. The Gospel is much older than the law of Moses; it existed
before the foundation of the world. Its principles are eternal, and were
made known to the spirits of men in that antemortal day when Jesus Christ
was chosen to be the “Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.” All
necessary preparations were made in the spirit life for the peopling of
this earth in a mortal existence. It was there decided that Adam should
come to this earth and stand as the progenitor of the race.
The Fall of Man and His Redemption
That Adam and his posterity might gain the experience
that can only be obtained in mortality, it was necessary that he should
break the law by which he was governed in the Garden of Eden, and thereby
subject himself and his posterity to death. To gain an exaltation man must
have experience and must exercise his free will. Then, knowing both good
and evil, by obeying the will of the Father he will receive a reward for
the good deeds done while in the flesh. The fall of man brought
temptation, sin and death. It was therefore essential that a Redeemer be
provided through whose atonement for the fall, all men, without regard to
their belief, race, or color, are entitled to come forth in the
resurrection of the dead, to be judged according to their works. “For
since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead.
For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive” (1 Cor.
15:21–22).
Individual Salvation Taught to Adam
Individual salvation requires that a man must repent and
accept the fulness of the Gospel if he would be exalted in the kingdom of
God. This plan of salvation was taught to Adam after his expulsion from
the Garden of Eden. He was baptized in water for the remission of his
sins, in the name of the only Begotten of the Father, and received the
Holy Ghost. He and his wife, Eve, were commanded to teach their children
the Gospel, that they also “might be sanctified from all sin, and enjoy
the words of eternal life in this world, and eternal life in the world to
come, even immortal glory” (Moses ch. 6).
In obedience to this commandment Adam and Eve made all
these things known to their sons and daughters. Thus the Gospel was taught
in the beginning and was declared from generation to generation. Adam
received the Holy Priesthood, which was also conferred upon the patriarchs
who followed after him. They were “preachers of righteousness, and spake
and prophesied, and called upon all men, everywhere, to repent, and faith
was taught unto the children of men” (Moses 6:22).
The Gospel Rejected in Days of Noah
In the days of Noah the Gospel was universally rejected,
save by Noah and his immediate family—in all eight souls. Noah had
labored diligently and long to bring mankind to repentance, but without
avail, “for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth” (Moses 8:29).
After the destruction of the wicked in the flood, the Gospel continued to
be taught by Noah and the later patriarchs, but quite generally it was not
received. Melchizedek, king of Salem, through his faithfulness, became a
great high priest, and the people of the Church in his day honored him by
calling the “Holy Priesthood after the order of the Son of God,” by his
name, “out of respect or reverence to the name of the Supreme Being” (D.
& C. 107:4). From Melchizedek, Abraham received the
Priesthood, and to Melchizedek, as the properly authorized servant of the
Lord, Abraham paid tithes of all he possessed (Gen. 14:20).
The Covenant with Abraham
Unto Abraham also was the Gospel preached and the Lord
made covenant with him that through him and his posterity should all
nations of the earth be blessed (Gen. 22:18). This same Gospel was also
declared to the children of Israel in its simple truth; but they proved
unworthy to receive it in its fulness, due to their long sojourn in Egypt,
where they had partaken of the customs, traditions and theology of the
Egyptians, and therefore “the word preached did not profit them, not being
mixed with faith in them that heard it” (Heb. 4:2). The Lord endeavored to
establish the fulness of his Gospel and authority among them, which Moses
plainly taught, and he sought to sanctify the people, “that they might
behold the face of God; but they hardened their hearts and could not
endure his presence, therefore the Lord in his wrath (for his anger was
kindled against them) swore that they should not enter into his rest while
in the wilderness, which rest is the fulness of his glory” (D.
& C. 84:23–24).
The Higher Priesthood and the Carnal Law
It became necessary, therefore, for the Lord to take
Moses and the Higher Priesthood out of their midst, but the Lesser
Priesthood, which holds the keys of the ministering of angels and the
preparatory Gospel—faith, repentance and baptism for the remission
of sins—he permitted to remain. To this he added the carnal law,
known as the law of Moses, which was added, so Paul informs us, as a
schoolmaster to prepare them to receive the fulness of the Gospel when
restored by Jesus Christ.
The Israelites, from the time they entered the promised
land to the coming of the Son of God, were living under the law of Moses,
which laid upon them severe and exacting restrictions because of their
refusal to receive the fulness of the Gospel when it was offered in the
wilderness. When the Savior came, it was to complete and fulfil the ends
of this law, of which he said not one jot or title should pass until all
was fulfilled.
Dispensation of the Meridian of Time
In the Dispensation of the Meridian of Time, when the
Savior ministered among the Jews, he restored the Gospel with the Higher
Priesthood. He called and ordained Twelve Apostles and gave them power,
before his ascension into heaven, to complete the church organization, and
commissioned them to carry the message of divine salvation into all the
world. In restoring that which had been taken away, he annulled the carnal
law, which had been added in the place of the higher law, for it had
filled the measure of its creation.
Commission of the Apostles
Under the commission Jesus gave the apostles to carry
the Gospel message into all the world and preach it to every creature,
they commenced their active ministry on the day of Pentecost, preaching in
power to the convincing of many souls. As the work of the ministry grew,
and the assistance of other laborers was required to carry on the work,
men were divinely called and ordained to specific offices in the Church.
The Lord, himself, had called and ordained, besides the twelve, seventies,
and sent them forth throughout Judea bearing the message of truth. When
they returned from that missionary journey it was with much rejoicing
because even the devils were subject unto them. What other officers the
Lord ordained and set apart, the scriptures do not reveal. That the Twelve
Apostles were empowered to set in order all things pertaining to the
Church, is, nevertheless, beyond dispute. We learn that under their
direction and ministry, as branches were formed and the work of the
ministry required it, high priests, evangelists, patriarchs, elders,
bishops, deacons, priests, pastors and teachers were called into the
service of the Church. The organization was in this manner effected during
the days of the apostles. The Church was also blessed with the divine
gifts and blessings of the Spirit of the Lord in those early days, just as
it was during the Savior’s ministry. There were in the Church many
prophets who uttered, by the gift of the Holy Ghost, many remarkable
predictions.
Essential Offices in the Church
All of these offices in the Church, are essential to the
advancement of the members and cannot be discarded with impunity. Paul
said, the Lord “gave some apostles; and some prophets; and some
evangelists; and some pastors and teachers; for the perfection of the
saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of
Christ.” These were not merely to remain in the Church during the
formative period, or for a brief season in order to start the work, and
then to be replaced by other officers of another kind. Men were ordained
to these callings “for the edifying of the body of Christ, till we all
come to the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God,
unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of
Christ” (Eph. 4:12–13). Evidently, then, as long as there is
imperfection in the Church among the members, in doctrine, knowledge, or
love, they fall short of “the stature of the fulness of Christ.”
These officers are all needed and cannot justly be
removed, for the Lord never so intended. The writer of the epistle to the
Ephesians also further compares all these officers to the various parts of
the human body and says: “From whom the whole body fitly joined together
and compacted by that which every joint supplieth, according to the
effectual working in the measure of every part, maketh increase of the
body unto the edifying of itself in love.” This same apostle also likens
the spiritual gifts to the physical body, declaring each to be essential
in the Church, just as the parts of the body are each necessary and one
part cannot say to another, “I have no need of you,” for all are necessary
that all men may “profit withal.”
Chapter 2
The Body of the Church Destroyed
Notwithstanding that the early officers of the Church
were endowed with the Holy Priesthood and exercised the spiritual gifts,
which were to remain until all came “unto a perfect man unto the stature
of the fulness of Christ,” there came a great and terrible change,
absolutely destroying the perfect body of the Church. In its place arose a
strange organization which eventually gained dominion over the earth and
ruled the destinies of men, not in love unfeigned, but in blood and
carnage most appalling, and with an iron hand.
The Falling Away Predicted
The rise of this power had been predicted by many of the
prophets of old and by the apostles of our Lord. Even the Savior, when
instructing his disciples regarding the signs of the times, intimated that
this would occur. Isaiah, seven centuries before the birth of Christ,
predicted that the time would come when the earth would be defiled under
its inhabitants because of the transgression of the law, the changing of
ordinances and the breaking of the new and everlasting covenant. It is
evident that this was to occur in the latter days, and not in the days of
Israel’s subjection to the law, for the law of Moses was not an
everlasting covenant. This prophecy was to receive its consummation in the
day when the earth, defiled by the wickedness and corruption of its
inhabitants, should be cleansed by fire and few men left (Isaiah 24:1
–6).
The Prophecies of Isaiah and Amos
Speaking of this event Isaiah says: “For the Lord hath
poured out upon you the spirit of deep sleep, and hath closed your eyes:
the prophets and your rulers, the seers hath he covered.” Shortly before
this time, Amos also predicted that the time would come when the Lord
would send a famine in the land, “not a famine of bread,” said he, “nor a
thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the Lord.”
The Vision of Daniel
Daniel saw in vision the overthrow of the Church
established by the Savior in the meridian of time. In his vision of the
four beasts, representing the kingdoms seen by Nebuchadnezzar in his
dream, he saw one horn, or power, come up among the ten that succeeded the
Roman Empire, “more stout than his fellows.” This horn had eyes and a
mouth that spake very great words against the Most High, and three other
kingdoms were subdued by this great horn. The same power “made war with
the saints and prevailed against them,” and through continued conflict and
exercise of might was able to “wear out the saints of the Most High” and
thought to “change times and laws.” This blasphemous power was to rule
until the coming of the Ancient of Days, when the kingdom and dominion was
to be “given to the people of the saints of the Most High whose kingdom is
an everlasting kingdom.”
Apostasy Commenced in Days of Apostles
The falling away from the faith commenced before the
close of the ministry of the apostles. Paul, when at Miletus taking his
final departure from the elders of Ephesus who had come to meet him,
earnestly entreated them to take heed to feed the Church of God, for, said
he, “I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in
among you, not sparing the flock, and of yourselves shall men arise,
speaking perverse things to draw away disciples after them.” He also took
occasion to warn the Saints at Thessalonica not to be deceived regarding
the ushering in of the second advent of the Son of God, “for that day,” he
wrote to them, “shall not come, except there come a falling away first,
and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; who opposeth and
exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshiped; so
that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, showing himself that he is
God.”
The Predictions of Paul
The Saints at Galatia commenced very early to depart
from the faith. Timothy was warned by Paul, and instructed that in the
last days perilous times would come and men would be “lovers of their
ownselves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents,
unthankful, unholy, without natural affection, truce breakers, false
accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, traitors,
heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more that lovers of God; having a
form of godliness, but denying the power thereof.” Moreover, he said the
time would come, “when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after
their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching
ears; and they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be
turned unto fables.”
Prophecy of Peter
Peter, likewise, by the spirit of prophecy, bore record
of the departure from the faith when he wrote to the Saints, saying: “But
there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be
false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies,
even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift
destruction. And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of
whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of.” Then he sought to impress
upon the minds of the Saints the fact that the prophets before him had
also predicted these direful events, saying: “That ye may be mindful of
the words which were spoken before by the holy prophets, and of the
commandment of us the apostles of the Lord and Savior; knowing this first,
that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own
lusts, and saying: Where is the promise of his coming? for since the
fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning
of the creation.”
The Mystery of Iniquity
As already stated, Paul declared to the Thessalonians
that the “mystery of iniquity” was already at work, and to Timothy he
said: “All they which are in Asia be turned away from me.” He had, we are
led to believe, had some dispute with Asiatic converts, for he wrote to
Timothy in great sorrow because some of his companions had forsaken him
and were advocating doctrines contrary to the Gospel of Jesus Christ. In
trying to correct these evils he was left to contend alone, for he adds:
“At my first answer no man stood with me, but all men forsook me.”
Decline of Spiritual Gifts
It was not long after the departure of the apostles that
spiritual gifts ceased to be manifest in the Church. The decline of these
blessings, which are inseparably connected with the Church of Christ, led
to the belief, so prevalent even in this day, that they were not to be
continued, having been instituted in the incipiency of the Church, merely
as a means of aiding in its establishment, after which they were no longer
needed.
Revelation and heavenly communication also came to an
end. There was no more vision, for the people had closed their eyes. This
condition also led to the universal belief, which the world holds even
now, that the canon of scripture is full and there is to be no more
scripture, notwithstanding the Lord has revealed through his servants that
revelation is to continue.
Changes in Church Government
The offices in the Priesthood were also changed because
those unto whom the Gospel was preached would not endure sound doctrine,
but after their own lusts heaped to themselves teachers having itching
ears and were “men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith.”
The Church Taken from Among Men
Instead of apostles and prophets there came, as time
went on, a very different ecclesiastical order from that instituted by the
Lord. The Church established by the Redeemer was taken from the earth
because of continued persecution and apostasy, until there was but a dead
form of the true Church left. The great ecclesiastical organization that
arose and claimed to be the Church of Christ was of gradual growth. The
change from truth to error was not made all in one day. It commenced in
the first century and continued during the immediate centuries that
followed, until the Church established in the days of the apostles was no
more to be found among men. Without the direction of inspired men, who
could communicate with God, the change was a natural one.
Rise of the Church of Rome
In the beginning of the fourth century this great
religious power, under the Emperor Constantine became the state religion
of the Roman Empire. From that time forth its dominion spread and before
many years had passed away it became the ruling power in religion in the
so-called civilized world. By it “times and laws” were changed. The simple
principles of the Christian faith were embellished almost beyond
recognition with pomp and mystic rites borrowed from pagan worship. The
priests and potentates, who officiated in these ceremonies, no longer
followed the simple customs of the humble fishermen of Galilee but,
dressed in splendid and costly robes, with mitres on their heads, they
performed their various parts in pride and with mystifying ceremonies that
over-awed and bewildered the humble people.
Changes in the Doctrines of the Church
The correct doctrine regarding the Godhead taught by
Jesus Christ, was changed into a mystery. The ordinance of baptism was
changed from burial in the water for the remission of sins, to sprinkling
of a little water on the head. Sprinkling of infants, miscalled baptism, a
custom which “is mockery before God, denying the mercies of Christ, and
the power of the Holy Spirit,” became a fixed and universal custom.
Changes in the administration of the sacrament of the Lord’s supper were
also introduced, and the doctrine advanced that the bread and wine became
the flesh and blood of our crucified Redeemer, by transubstantiation.
Those who entered the ministry were forbidden to marry, and many other
changes, which need not be mentioned here, were made in the principles of
the Gospel, in the functions of the Priesthood and the worship of the Lord.
Temporal Power of the Pope
Rome became the capital of this ecclesiastical power and
the bishop or pope, as he was called, its head. As its power grew it
claimed dominion not only in matter religious, but in civil affairs as
well. During the acme of its glory it ruled practically the known world.
By it kings were made and by it they were dethroned. Unless they bowed
before the papal power in abject submission they were made to feel the
weight of its mighty hand.
Frederick Seebohm, in his Era of
the Protestant Revolution, says: “Kings were not secure on their
thrones till they had the sanction of the Church. On the other hand the
clergy claimed to be free from prosecution under the criminal laws of the
land they lived in. They struggled to keep their own ecclesiastical laws
and their own ecclesiastical courts, receiving authority direct from Rome,
and with final appeal, not to the crown, but to the pope.”
“To establish an accusation against a bishop,” writes
Motley, in his Rise of the Dutch Republic,
“seventy-two witnesses were necessary; against a deacon, twenty-seven;
against an inferior dignitary, seven; while two were sufficient to convict
a layman.”
Power of the Clergy
Few outside of the clergy were educated enough to read
and write; therefore priests became the lawyers, diplomats, ambassadors,
instructors and prime ministers in the nations. All learned men talked and
wrote in Latin, which was the language of Rome. It is said that for
centuries a man convicted of a crime in England, by showing that he could
read or write, could claim the benefits of a trial in the ecclesiastical
court, which, “by long abuse came to mean exemption from the punishment of
the criminal law of the land.”
Not only did the priests fill these important offices
where they were enabled to wield great power and to control, very largely,
the destinies of nations, but many of them became extremely avaricious and
“divined for money.” Jean de Valdez, brother of the secretary to King
Charles V, wrote of the times as follows: “I see that we can scarcely get
anything from Christ’s ministers but for money; at baptism money, at
bishoping money, at marriage money, for confession money—no, not
extreme unction without money! They will ring no bells without money, no
burial in Church without money; so that it seemeth that Paradise is shut
up from them that have no money. The rich is buried in the Church, the
poor in the church-yard. The rich may marry with his nearest kin, but the
poor not so, albeit he be ready to die for love of her. The rich may eat
flesh in Lent, but the poor may not, albeit fish perhaps be much dearer.
The rich man may readily get large indulgences, but the poor none, because
he wanteth money to pay for them” (Era of the
Protestant Revolution, p. 60).
In addition to all this they taxed the people in various
ways, receiving a tithing from all produce of the farms, a tenth of the
land and of the wages of the working man. Writes Motley: “Not content,
moreover, with their territories and their tithings, the churchmen
perpetually devised new burdens upon the peasantry. Plows, sickles,
horses, oxen, all implements of husbandry were taxed for the benefit of
those who toiled not, but who gathered into barns.”
Sale of Indulgences
Some of these ecclesiastical rulers became so avaricious
and filled with the spirit of greed that they advanced the blasphemous
doctrine of forgiving sins by the sale of indulgences. It is claimed by
the Church of Rome that these evils were the sins of individuals who
perverted the doctrine of the church in relation to penance and
forgiveness of sin. The indulgence was, according to their teaching, “a
pardon usually granted by the pope, through which the contrite sinner
escaped a part, or all, of the punishment which remained even after he had
been absolved. The pardon did not therefore forgive the guilt of the
sinner, for that had necessarily to be removed before the indulgence was
granted; it only removed or mitigated the penalties which even the
forgiven sinner would, without the indulgence, have expected to undergo in
purgatory.”1
However, the sale of indulgences in various parts of
Europe, was a means of creating large fortunes for those who sanctioned
it. There was no crime in the category for which the power of forgiveness
was not offered if the party seeking it could pay the price. The various
countries were districted and farmed for the collection of these revenues,
according to John Lathrop Motley, the historian, who writes:
“The price current of the wares offered for sale was
published in every town and village [in the Netherlands]. God’s pardon
for crimes already committed, or about to be committed, was advertized
according to a graded tariff. Thus poisoning, for example, was absolved
for eleven ducats, six livres tournois. Absolution for incest was
afforded at thirty-six livres, three ducats. Perjury came to seven
livres and three carlines. Pardon for murder, if not by poison, was
cheaper. Even a parricide could buy forgiveness at God’s tribunal at one
ducat, four livres, eight carlines. Henry de Mountfort, in the year
1448, purchased absolution for that crime at that price. Was it strange
that a century or so of this kind of work should produce a Luther? Was
it unnatural that plain people, who loved the ancient Church, should
rather desire to see her purged of such blasphemous abuses than to hear
of St. Peter’s dome rising a little nearer to the clouds on these
proceeds of commuted crime? . . . The Netherlands, like
other countries, are districted and farmed for the collection of this
papal revenue. Much of the money thus raised remains in the hands of the
vile collectors. Sincere Catholics, who love and honor the ancient
religion, shrink with horror at the spectacle offered on every side.
Criminals buying paradise for money, monks spending the money thus paid
in gaming houses, taverns, and brothels; this seems to those who have
studied their Testaments a different scheme of salvation from the one
promulgated by Christ. There has evidently been a departure from the
system of earlier apostles. Innocent conservative souls are much
perplexed; but at last all these infamies arouse a giant to do battle
with the giant wrong.”2
Thus were the prophecies of the scriptures fulfilled;
the laws transgressed by a power that exalted itself “above all that is
called God” and in his sacred name speaking “great words against the Most
High.”
Notes
History of Western Europe, p. 39, James
Harvey Robinson.
The Rise of the Dutch Republic, vol. 1, pp. 63
–66, Motley.
Chapter 3
The “Dark Ages”
Not content with absolute dominion over the spiritual
and temporal affairs of the people, this papal kingdom attempted the
exercise of authority also over the consciences of men. Especially was
this so during the dark ages, when this power was at the zenith of its
glory. This exercise of authority extended also far into the day when the
light of religious freedom commenced to break forth, during the period
known as the revival of learning. Previous to this revival, as we have
seen, the language of learning was the Latin tongue. The people were
helplessly dependent upon their priests for all instruction in scientific
as well as religious thought. The few copies of the Bible extant were
guarded by the clergy, and the scriptures were not accessible to the
common people, and since they could neither read nor write, and in very
few instances understood Latin, they would have been helpless even with
the Bible in their hands. Under these conditions it is not to be wondered
at that the poor people of those benighted countries of Europe, credulous
and filled with superstitious fear, were ready to accept almost anything
that was made known to them, in doctrine or deed, by unscrupulous priests.
The Revival of Learning
Neither is it to be wondered at that priests attempted
to use force and coercion during the revival of learning to check the
opportunities of the people in obtaining light and truth. It was due to
the exercise of greater knowledge on the part of the priests and their
performance of mystic ceremonies, that over-awed the people and enabled
the clergy to keep them shackled by the chains of ignorance and
superstition. Ignorance was a ready tool in the hands of the priests by
which they shaped and moulded the masses into vessels to their liking. The
increase of learning among the people, aided by the discoveries and
inventions of the times, would change all this; for the people would not
be so ready to accept every wind of doctrine without some mental
cogitation and desire to have a reason given why things were thus and so.
Moreover, the revival of learning meant the end of many practices and
blasphemous doctrines advanced in the name of Jesus Christ, such as the
exercise of force over the consciences of men and the sale of indulgences
for the pardon of sin—if not the end, at least a wonderful
modification of such an evil system.
Early Translations of the Bible
Evidently this ruling ecclesiastical power realized that
enlightened conditions would bring rebellion against its authority. For
that reason stringent laws were framed to enforce the edicts and
regulations of the church of Rome. During the “Reformation” and before,
there were several translations of the Bible made in the languages which
the common people understood. Wycliffe’s Bible appeared in 1380 and was
followed by translations at a later date, both in English and other
tongues. At first there was an attempt to destroy these copies which were
prepared without authority or sanction from the Catholic Church. With the
invention of printing in the fifteenth century, however, the cause of
religious freedom received a wonderful impetus, and Bibles were
distributed all over Europe. Before the time of printing a Bible cost five
hundred crowns, and such copies as were in existence were in the keeping
of the clergy, who guarded them with the utmost zeal. Through the aid of
printing, the price of Bibles was reduced to five crowns, which made it
possible for the people not only to have the privilege of hearing the
scriptures read in their own tongue, but also to acquire the understanding
by which they could read them for themselves.
Scripture-Reading Forbidden
An English chronicler, Henry Kneighton, many years
before the “Reformation” expressed the prevailing notion about the reading
of the scriptures when he denounced the general reading of the Bible,
lamenting “lest the jewel of the Church, hitherto the exclusive property
of the clergy and divines, should be made common to the laity.” Archbishop
Arundel in England had issued an enactment that “no part of the scriptures
in English should be read, either in public or in private, or be
thereafter translated, under pain of the greater excommunication.” The New
Testament translation of Erasmus was forbidden at Cambridge, and the Vicar
of Croyden said from his pulpit: “We must root out printing, or printing
will root us out.” In the reign of Henry VIII the reading of the Bible by
the common people, or those who were not of the privileged class, had been
prohibited by act of Parliament, and men were burned at the stake in
England as well as in the Netherlands and other parts of Europe for having
even fragments of the scriptures in their hands.
For those who were considered derelict in church duties
or heretical in doctrine, edicts were declared, forbidding them to gather
in private assemblies for devotion, in various parts of Europe. All
reading of the scriptures; all discussion within one’s own doors
concerning faith, the sacraments, the papal authority, or other religious
matter, was forbidden “under penalty of death. The edicts were no dead
letter. The fires were kept constantly supplied with human fuel by monks
who knew the act of burning reformers better than of arguing with them.
The scaffold was the most conclusive of syllogisms, and used upon all
occasions” (The Rise of the Dutch Republic,
Motley).
The Inquisition
Continuing this woeful account of conditions in the
rebellious Netherlands and other countries under Spanish rule, the author
of The Rise of the Dutch Republic says: “Charles
V introduced and organized a papal institution, side by side with those
horrible ‘Placards’ of his invention, which constituted a masked
inquisition even more cruel than that of Spain. . . . The
execution of the system was never permitted to languish. The number of
Netherlanders who were burned, strangled, beheaded, or buried alive, in
obedience to his edicts, and for the offense of reading the scriptures, of
looking askance at a graven image, or of ridiculing the actual presence of
the body and blood of Christ in a wafer, have been placed as high as one
hundred thousand by distinguished authorities, and have never been put at
a lower mark than fifty thousand.”
Dawning of a Better Day
Conditions like these could not go on forever. The dawn
of a better day began to break over the nations. The Spirit of the Lord
was striving with men and preparations commenced for the introduction into
the world of the re-established Gospel at a later day. It was necessary
that the shackles of superstitious fear and illiteracy, which bound the
world so completely, should be broken, that men might exercise their right
of free agency before the fulness of Gospel light should break forth. Not
only was advancement made in the art of printing, but there came a revival
of learning and research in all directions and in all parts of Europe. It
was not confined to one land or to one people, but the whole of Europe
took on a new life. The discovery of the telescope, the law of
gravitation, the invention of gunpowder and many other wonderful things,
were revolutionizing the thoughts of men.
The Mission of Columbus
With the discovery of the mariner’s compass navigators
became more bold and daring, and gradually extended their explorations
until they discovered the way to India around the Cape of Good Hope. Near
the close of the fifteenth century the belief prevailed that the earth was
flat and inhabited only on the upper side. Beyond the shores of lands then
known it was thought there hung a pall of fog and darkness. The sea was
referred to as the “Sea of Darkness” beyond the boundaries known to man.
Far off in or beyond the ocean it was believed great dragons had their
lair, and if any man should be so unfortunate as to drift among them he
would return no more. Mariners had been afraid to traverse the seas far
beyond the sight of land. Shortly before the end of this century there
came one navigator more daring than his fellows, who proposed to cross the
sea. After many pleadings and attempts to interest some one with means in
the venture, he finally succeeded and the remarkable feat was done. In
accomplishing this he made discoveries that the Lord, in his wisdom, had
kept hid from the nations of the east all down through the ages, until in
his own due time he desired them to be revealed. Columbus was moved upon
by the Spirit of the Lord and crossed the waters in fulfilment of
predictions made by a prophet, who lived on this continent, five hundred
years before the birth of Christ.
The “Reformation”
All these things played an important part in the
establishment of individual and religious freedom. The most important
agency of all in this great work was doubtless the so-called
“Reformation,” which was in fact a revolution from the bondage of the
church of Rome. Great men of intellectual power began to undermine the
thraldom of the religious world. This rebellion against the dominion of
Rome was almost simultaneous in the various lands. In England,
Scandinavia, France, Switzerland, the Netherlands and Germany, many
“reformers” arose near the end of the fifteenth and during the sixteenth
century. They were of varying degrees of enthusiasm and opposition to the
teachings of that time. In the beginning their only desire was to correct
evils within the Catholic Church, but failing in this many of them openly
rebelled and set up independent churches of their own.
Martin Luther
The greatest of these “reformers” was Martin Luther in
Germany, who did more than any other individual in casting off the yoke of
bondage placed upon the people by the papacy. Powerful princes came to his
aid, but there was not in Germany at that time the cohesion of the people,
or the centralization of power, that existed in England under Henry VIII,
or in Sweden, where Gustavus Vasa reigned. Luther’s task, therefore, was a
heavy one, but he nobly carried it through to the bitter end.
The Protestant Revolution a Preparatory Work
Their mission was not, however, to set up the Church or
Christ, for the time was not ripe, and that important event was reserved
for another generation. They were called to be forerunners of that
eventful day, and did much to prepare the world for the ushering in of the
Dispensation of the Fulness of Times. The Lord did not call them to their
great work by an opening of the heavens; by visitation of angel, or direct
communication, as in times of old; neither did any of them claim that in
this manner they had been called. Nevertheless it was the Spirit of the
Lord which rested upon them and inspired them to fight against the
abominations and practices of their times committed in the name of
religion. Such, at least, was the case with most of them. The motive of
Henry VIII of England, was a selfish one; yet the Lord brought good out of
it in behalf of religious freedom. At first Henry opposed the rebellion of
Luther and others most vigorously, even writing in defense of the pope of
Rome, for which service he received the benediction of the pope and the
title of “Defender of the Faith.” Afterwards, when his own interests where
in conflict with the policy of the Catholic Church and in no wise he could
prevail, he became rebellious, with the result that he was excommunicated
by the pope. In defense he established an independent church, known today
as the Church of England, of which he became the head. Parliament and the
people were back of him and thus the great state church of England was
brought into being.
Disagreement Among “Reformers”
The pity of it all is that these “reformers” when they
established their religious freedom, could not agree among themselves.
They were constantly in turmoil, contending one with another on points of
doctrine, which led to considerable bitterness and the establishing of
various and conflicting sects. Moreover, they had not learned the lesson
themselves, through all the persecutions they were forced to suffer, that
toleration was a fundamental principle of freedom. Because this great
lesson had not been learned the persecuted became the persecutors in many
cases, and were just as intolerant where they had the power with those who
disagreed with them as their enemies had been with them.
America a Land of Freedom
Nevertheless the seeds of toleration had been sown, but
they were of slow growth. Toleration was a matter of education and
therefore came by degrees and could not burst forth in full fruition at
once. Not until there had been much shedding of blood in Europe, and more
particularly in America during the war for independence, were the people
fully awakened to this truth. It required a planting in new soil in a
choice land above all other lands. Here in America freedom and religious
toleration became a fundamental part of our great government. Our land
became a land of refuge for the afflicted, the downtrodden, and the
oppressed of other nations, who found in the United States a haven of
rest; for this land had been dedicated to liberty by the shedding of blood.
Praise be to the great souls who conducted the
Protestant Revolution. They helped to make it possible for the
establishment of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in the
early part of the nineteenth century, preparatory to the second coming of
the Son of God. For all the good they did we honor them, and they shall
receive their reward which shall be great. They were not restorers, but
were sent to prepare the way for one who was yet to come with a mission of
restoration and everlasting power.
Part Two
Opening of the Dispensation of the Fulness of Times
Chapter 4
The Marvelous Work
The work of the Protestant revolution having been
accomplished, and the land of America having been prepared by the sowing
of the seed of religious freedom, the time for the restoration of the
Gospel had arrived. The promise made by the Savior that the Gospel of the
kingdom should be preached in all the world for a witness, was about to be
fulfilled, and the Church of Jesus Christ was again to be established in
the earth. The “marvelous work and a wonder,” which Isaiah predicted
should come forth in the latter days, was about to make its appearance, to
the confounding of the wisdom of the worldly wise.
Reasonable and Scriptural to Expect a Restoration
It is reasonable as well as scriptural, to believe that
the Lord, before he shall come in judgment and to commence his reign of a
thousand years, will send a messenger to prepare the way before him. In
justice the people should be warned and given the privilege of repentance
and remission of sins, through the preaching of the Gospel, and have an
opportunity for membership in the Church of Christ. “Surely the Lord God
will do nothing,” said Amos, “until he revealeth the secret unto his
servants the prophets.”1
Ancient Predictions to be Fulfilled
Many of the ancient prophets had spoken of the opening
of the heavens and revealing anew to man, the everlasting Gospel, before
the second coming of the Lord. The visitation of heavenly messengers, and
the pouring out of the Spirit of the Lord, in which the sons and daughters
of Israel should prophesy, old men dream dreams, and the young men see
visions, were also foretold as events for the latter days.
Daniel Saw Our Day
Daniel, in vision, while an exile at the court of
Babylon’s great king, saw our day and the work of setting up the kingdom
which should be given to the Saints of the Most High, who should possess
it “even forever and forever.” The same event he confirmed in the
interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar’s dream of the wonderfully constructed
image. It was to be in the last days at a time when the kingdoms
represented by the toes of the image should bear rule. In that day the God
of heaven will “set up a kingdom which shall never be destroyed, or left
to other people.”
Vision of John
John also saw the time when the Gospel should be
declared by an angel flying in the midst of heaven “having the everlasting
gospel to preach unto them that dwell on the earth, and to every nation,
and kindred, and tongue, and people, saying with a loud voice, Fear God,
and give glory to him; for the hour of his judgment is come: and worship
him that made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and the fountains of
waters.” This also was to be in the last day, when the people were
departed from the teachings of the Lord, and needed a call unto
repentance, for this angel was to be followed by another who should say:
“Babylon is fallen, is fallen;” and before Babylon should fall, she was to
be warned and given a chance of repentance.
Joseph Smith Divinely Called
It was necessary, therefore, that one should be chosen
and clothed with power from the Father to re-establish the Church of Jesus
Christ on the earth.2 In choosing a representative to stand at
the head of this “great and marvelous work, about to come forth unto the
children of men,” the Lord did not select one who was versed in the
learning and traditions of the world. His ways are not the ways of man,
neither are his thoughts like the thoughts of men. One taught in the
learning of the world would have had too much to unlearn of the traditions
and philosophy of men. In his great wisdom, the Lord chose an
unsophisticated child—a boy fourteen years of age. Unto this youth
the Lord revealed the fulness of the Gospel, which the world could not
receive because of unbelief. Through years of heavenly guidance—for
he was instructed by messengers from the presence of the Lord—this
young man, Joseph Smith, was prepared to direct the work of the
restoration of the Gospel and the building of the Kingdom of God.
Notes
Amos 3:7. The Prophet Joseph Smith’s revision.
The erroneous idea which prevails in the world in relation to the
Church, is set forth in Smith’s Bible Dictionary,
Article—Church, vol. 1, p. 458, as follows: “We have seen that
according to the scriptural view the Church is a holy kingdom, established
by God on earth, of which Christ is the invisible King—it is a
divinely organized body, the members of which are knit together amongst
themselves, and joined to Christ their Head, by the Holy Spirit, who
dwells in and animates it; it is a spiritual but visible society of men
united by constant succession to those who were personally united to the
Apostles, holding the same faith that the Apostles held, administering the
same sacraments, and like them forming separate, but only locally
separate, assemblies, for the public worship of God. This is the Church
according to the Divine intention. But as God permits men to mar the
perfection of his designs in their behalf, and as men have both corrupted
the doctrines and broken the unity of the Church, we must not expect to
see the Church of Holy Scripture actually existing in its perfection on
earth. It is not to be found, thus perfect, either in the collected
fragments of Christendom, or still less in any one of these fragments;
though it is possible that one of those fragments more than another may
approach the scriptural and Apostolic ideal which existed only until sin,
heresy, and schism, had time sufficiently to develop themselves to do
their work.”
Chapter 5
Ancestry of Joseph Smith
Joseph Smith was born in Sharon, Windsor County,
Vermont, December 23, 1805. He was the third son and fourth child of
Joseph and Lucy Mack Smith, who had a family of ten children. His parents
were of sturdy New England stock, honest, godfearing, industrious, but
poor in worldly substance. Joseph Smith had descended on his paternal side
from Robert Smith, who emigrated from England in the year 1638. There is
no record to be found of the ancestry of Robert Smith, nor do we know at
this time from what part of England he came, further than that he went in
his early youth to Boston, Lincolnshire, and then to London, where he took
ship for America. He landed in Boston, Massachusetts, and moved to that
part of Rowley, in Essex County, which afterwards became the township of
Boxford. Here, later, he purchased two hundred eight acres of land, a
portion of which was in Topsfield township. He married Miss Mary French.
They were the parents of ten children. Robert was known among his
neighbors as a quiet, unassuming man, devoted to the welfare of the
settlement. Through his industry he was able to provide some comforts for
his family, who were reared in the prevailing religious teachings of that
day, but strictly in the knowledge of the scriptures.
Patriotic Service of Samuel Smith
Samuel, son of Robert and Mary, was born January 26,
1666. He married Rebecca, daughter of John Curtis, a prominent citizen of
the town of Topsfield. After his father’s death, Samuel moved to
Topsfield, where he became an influential member of that community and was
honored by the citizens with several offices of trust. He was the father
of nine children. His son Samuel, born January 26, 1714, was one of the
most prominent citizens of Topsfield. The greater part of his life was
spent in the service of the people. He passed through the stormy days of
the American Revolution and bore arms in defense of the liberties of the
people. Among the many positions he held are the following: He was grand
juryman in 1760; in 1770, road supervisor; in 1779, 1780, 1783, 1784 and
1785, on the committee of safety; from 1771 to 1777 and in 1781 and 1782,
assessor and selectman in Topsfield, declining the honor in 1783; he was
moderator, in 1758–60, 1762, 1764, 1766–73, 1777–80, and
1782–83; representative to the General Court (House of
Representatives) in 1764–70, 1772, 1777–78, and 1781; town
clerk in 1774, 1776 and 1777; delegate to the Provincial Congress at
Concord, October 11, 1774 and again January 19, 1775, and on the tea
committee, from Topsfield and acted as chairman, in 1773.
He was known as Captain Samuel Smith, receiving his
military title during service in the militia of Massachusetts. He married
Priscilla, daughter of Zacheus Gould of Topsfield. They had five children,
two sons and three daughters. The mother died shortly after the birth of
her youngest child, and Samuel married a cousin of his first wife who bore
the same name. He died November 22, 1785, leaving an estate valued at more
than 544 pounds sterling. The Salem Gazette of November 22, 1785, made
mention of him in the following words:
“Died.—At Topsfield, on Monday, the 14th instant,
Samuel Smith, Esq. So amiable and worthy a character as he evidently
appeared, both in public and private, will render the memory of him ever
precious. For a number of years he represented the town in the General
Court, where he was esteemed a man of integrity and uprightness. His
usefulness among those with whom he was more immediately conversant was
eminent. He was a sincere friend to the liberties of his country, and a
strenuous advocate for the doctrine of Christianity.”
“The memory of the Just be blessed.”
Asael Smith Grandfather of Joseph Smith
Asael Smith was the second son and youngest child of (2)
Samuel. He was born in Topsfield, March 7, 1744. His mother died, as
already noted, shortly after his birth. His early life was spent in
Topsfield. February 12, 1767, he took to wife, Mary Duty, of Windham, New
Hampshire, and later moved to that place. From there he went to Dunbarton
and then to Derryfield, now the city of Manchester. During the Revolution
he followed the example of his illustrious father and served with the
Colonial forces. After the death of his father in 1785, he returned to
Topsfield and made his home on the family estate. He lived in the old
home, about one mile north of the town, where a number of his children
were born, notably Joseph, father of the Prophet Joseph Smith.
Asael was a man of very liberal views, far in advance of
his time. Some of his children were members of the Congregational Church,
but in his religious views he leaned towards the teachings of the
Universalists. However, he held aloof from all sects, because he could not
reconcile his understanding of the scriptures with their many conflicting
creeds. He advocated the truth very strongly, that all men should have
free and equal religious liberty. In his opinions he was frank and
explicit, expressing himself without fear of the prevailing opinions of
his neighbors. He was somewhat gifted with the pen and wrote some worthy
sentiments which have been preserved and are still in possession of
members of the family. Many years before his death he wrote a charge to
his family in which the advice given could be followed with great profit
by parents and children even in our day. An excerpt from this document
will give an insight into the character of this man and depict his
remarkable faith in Jesus Christ:
Advice of Asael Smith to His Family
“And first to you, my dear wife,” he wrote, “I do with
all the strength and power that is in me, thank you for your kindness and
faithfulness to me, beseeching God who is the husband of the widow, to
take care of you and not to leave you nor forsake you, or suffer you to
leave nor forsake him, nor his ways. Put your whole trust solely in him,
he never did nor never will forsake any that trust in him. . .
. And now my dear children, let me pour out my heart to you and
speak first of immortality in your souls. Trifle not in this point; the
soul is immortal; you have to deal with an infinite Majesty; you go upon
life and death, therefore in this point be serious. Do all to God in a
serious manner; when you think of him, speak of him, pray to him, or in
any way make your addresses to his great Majesty, be in good earnest.
Trifle not with his name or with his attributes, nor call him to witness
to any thing but is absolute truth, nor then, but when sound reason or
serious consideration requires it. And as to religion, I would not wish to
point out any particular way for you; but first I would wish you to search
the scriptures and consult sound reason and see if they (which I take to
be two witnesses that stand by the God of the whole earth) are not
sufficient to evince to you that religion is a necessary theme. .
. .
“For the public.—Bless God that you live in a land
of liberty and bear yourselves dutifully and conscionably towards the
authority under which you live. See God’s providence in the appointment of
the Federal Constitution and hold union and order precious jewels.”
Prediction of Asael Smith
In the spring of 1791 he moved from Topsfield to
Tunbridge, Vermont, where he made his home for several years. As old age
came on and his health became impaired he removed to Stockholm, St.
Lawrence County, New York, and made his home with his son Silas. Here he
died, October 31, 1830, at the advanced age of more than 86 years. In
stature he was tall, his body was well proportioned and possessed of
unusual strength. At times the spirit of inspiration rested upon him. One
one occasion he said: “It has been borne in upon my soul that one of my
descendants will promulgate a work to revolutionize the world of religious
faith.” Perhaps he did not expect to live to see that day, but such proved
to be the case. The first summer after the organization of the Church, his
son Joseph and grandson Don Carlos Smith paid him a visit and presented
him with a copy of the Book of Mormon. At the time he was in feeble
health, but he diligently read the book, or most of it, and said he was
convinced that the work of his grandson, Joseph Smith, was of divine
origin. He was not baptized, due to his weakened physical condition, and
died shortly after this visit. His wife, Mary Duty Smith, later moved to
Kirtland where she died in 1836, firm in the faith of the restored Gospel.
John Mack of Connecticut
On his maternal side, Joseph Smith was descended from
John Mack, who was born in Inverness, Scotland, March 6, 1653. John Mack
came to America about 1669, and resided, first in Salisbury,
Massachusetts. He married Sarah, daughter of Orlando and Sarah Bagley, and
moved to Lyme, Connecticut, where eight or more of their twelve children
were born. He was the founder of the Mack family of Connecticut. He died
Feb. 24, 1721.
Ebenezer, son of John Mack, was born in Lyme, Conn.,
Dec. 8, 1697. He was a man of thrift and was well respected by the people
of Lyme, where he served for many years as minister of the Second
Congregational Church. He married Hannah, daughter of Aaron Huntly, an
honored citizen of Lyme. At one time Ebenezer Mack possessed considerable
property and “lived in good style commanding all the attention and respect
which are ever shown to those who live in fine circumstances, and habits
of strict morality.”1 Reverses came, however, and he was reduced,
in his declining years, to poverty. He was the father of nine children.
Maternal Grandparents of Joseph Smith
Solomon, son of Ebenezer Mack, was born in Lyme, Conn.,
Sept. 26, 1735. At the age of twenty-one years he enlisted in the services
of his country under the command of Captain Henry, and the regiment of
Col. Whiting. He was engaged in the king’s service with two teams carrying
supplies to Fort Edwards. In 1748 he enlisted under Major Spenser and was
engaged in several bloody engagements in which his life was spared
miraculously. He served until the spring of 1759, when he received his
honorable discharge at Crown Point. That same year he met a young school
teacher, Lydia Gates, daughter of Nathan Gates, a wealthy citizen of East
Haddam, Connecticut. The friendship of these young people ripened and they
were married after a short acquaintance. In 1761 Solomon and his young
wife moved to Marlow where they took up their residence in a wilderness.
Only four other families resided within forty miles of them. It was while
here he learned to fully appreciate the excellent virtues of his wife,
“For,” he writes, “as our children were deprived of schools she assumed
charge of their education, and performed the duties of instructoress as
none, save a mother, is capable of. Precepts, accompanied with examples
such as theirs, were calculated to make impressions on the minds of the
young, never to be forgotten. She, besides instructing them in the various
branches of an ordinary education, was in the habit of calling them
together both morning and evening, and teaching them to pray, meanwhile
urging upon them the necessity of love towards each other as well as
devotional feelings towards Him who made them.”
In this manner their children became confirmed in the
virtues and were established in faith in their Redeemer.
Patriotic Service of Solomon Mack
In 1776, Solomon Mack enlisted in the American army. For
some time he served in the land forces and later was transferred to the
navy. With his two sons, Jason and Stephen, he was engaged in a
privateering expedition commanded by Captain Havens. In this service they
passed through some thrilling experiences, but escaped without great harm.
His service in the war covered a period of about four years. After his
discharge he went to Gilsum, New Hampshire, to make his home. Owing to the
rigorous campaigns through two wars, he became broken in health and
suffered considerably in his declining years. His son Stephen moved to
Vermont and later to Detroit, where he engaged in mercantile pursuits and
was one of the founders of Detroit. During the war of 1812 Stephen again
entered the services of his country. He held the commission of a captain
at the time of the siege of Detroit and was ordered by his superior
officer to surrender, which he boldly refused to do. Breaking his sword
across his knee he threw the parts into the lake and said he would not
submit to such a disgraceful compromise while the blood of an American ran
in his veins.
Such is the character of the forebears of Joseph Smith.
Notes
History of the Prophet Joseph, by Lucy Mack
Smith.
Chapter 6
The Birth of Joseph Smith, the Prophet
Joseph Smith, son of Asael, was born in Topsfield, July
12, 1771. Near the close of the eighteenth century he was residing in
Tunbridge, Vermont, where he owned a good farm and engaged in tilling the
soil. It was here he met Lucy Mack, daughter of Solomon Mack, of Gilsum,
who later became his wife. She was visiting in Tunbridge with her brother
Stephen, who at that time was a resident of Tunbridge. Joseph Smith, after
his marriage, continued to reside in Tunbridge for about six years. In
1802 he rented his farm and moved to Randolph, to engage in the mercantile
business. Later he sold his farm in Tunbridge and moved to Royalton, then
to Sharon, Windsor County, where their son Joseph was born, Dec. 23, 1805.
In 1811 the Smith family moved from Vermont to Lebanon, New Hampshire,
just over the border line, where they intended to settle down “and began
to contemplate, with joy and satisfaction” the prosperity which had
attended their exertions. They were desirous, as most parents are, to
provide comfortably for their children and give them the advantages of an
education. Of this desire the Joseph Smith mother writes:
Early Struggles of the Smiths
“As our children had, in a great measure, been debarred
from the privilege of schools, we began to make every arrangement to
attend to this important duty. We established our second son, Hyrum, in an
academy at Hanover; and the rest, that were of sufficient age, we were
sending to a common school that was quite convenient; meanwhile myself and
companion were doing all that our abilities would admit of for the future
welfare and advantage of the family; and were greatly blessed in our
labors.”
These desires, however, were rudely shattered, for an
epidemic of typhus fever passed over the land and all the Smith children
were sorely afflicted. The oldest daughter, Sophronia, lay for a long time
nigh unto death, and was saved only by Divine providence in answer to
prayer. Joseph recovered from the fever after an illness of two weeks, but
was left suffering with extreme pain in his shoulder which was first
treated as the result of a sprain, but later developments proved it to be
from another cause. A bag of pus had formed which had to be lanced. The
description of his suffering is very vividly told by his mother in the
following words:
Serious Affliction of Joseph Smith
“As soon as the sore had discharged itself, the pain
left it, and shot like lightning (using his own terms) down his side into
the marrow of the bone of his leg, and soon became very severe. My poor
boy, at this, was almost in despair, and he cried out, ‘Oh, father, the
pain is so severe, how can I bear it!’
“His leg soon began to swell, and he continued to suffer
the greatest agony for the space of two weeks longer. During this period I
carried him much of the time in my arms in order to mitigate his suffering
as much as possible; in consequence of which I was taken very ill myself.
The anxiety of mind that I experienced, together with physical
over-exertion, was too much for my constitution, and my nature sank under
it.
Tenderness of Hyrum Smith
“Hyrum who was rather remarkable for his tenderness and
sympathy, now desired that he might take my place, as he was a good,
trusty boy we let him do so; and, in order to make the task as easy for
him as possible, we laid Joseph upon a low bed, and Hyrum sat beside him,
almost day and night, for some considerable length of time, holding the
affected part of his leg in his hands, and pressing it between them so
that his afflicted brother might be enabled to endure the pain, which was
so excruciating that he was scarcely able to bear it.
Surgical Aid Sought
“At the end of three weeks, we thought it advisable to
send again for the surgeon. When he came, he made an incision of eight
inches on the front side of the leg, between the knee and ankle. This
relieved the pain in a great measure, and the patient was quite
comfortable until the wound began to heal, when the pain became as violent
as ever.
“The surgeon was called again, and he this time enlarged
the wound, cutting the leg even to the bone. It commenced healing the
second time, and as soon as it began to heal, it also began to swell
again, which swelling continued to rise till we deemed it wisdom to call a
council of surgeons; and when they met in consultation, they decided that
amputation was the only remedy.
A Council Held
“Soon after coming to this conclusion, they rode up to
the door, and were invited into a room, apart from the one in which Joseph
lay. They being seated, I addressed them thus: ‘Gentlemen, what can you do
to save my boy’s leg?’ They answered, ‘We can do nothing; we have cut it
open to the bone, and find it so affected that we consider his leg
incurable, and that amputation is absolutely necessary in order to save
his life.’
“This was like a thunderbolt to me. I appealed to the
principal surgeon, saying, ‘Dr. Stone, can you not make another trial? Can
you not, by cutting around the bone, take out the diseased part, and
perhaps that which is sound will heal over, and by this means you will
save his leg? You will not, you must not, take off his leg until you try
once more. I will not consent to let you enter his room until you make me
this promise.’
“After consulting a short time with each other, they
agreed to do as I had requested, then went to see my suffering son. One of
the doctors, on approaching his bed, said, ‘My poor boy, we have come
again.’ ‘Yes,’ said Joseph, ‘I see you have; but you have not come to take
off my leg, have you, sir?’ ‘No,’ replied the surgeon, ‘It is your
mother’s request that we make one more effort, and that is what we have
now come for.’
“The principal surgeon, after a moment’s conversation,
ordered cords to be brought to bind Joseph fast to the bedstead; but to
this Joseph objected. The doctor, however, insisted that he must be
confined, upon which Joseph said very decidedly, ‘No, doctor, I will not
be bound, for I can bear the operation much better if I have my liberty.’
‘Then,’ said Dr. Stone, ‘will you drink some brandy?’
“‘No,’ said Joseph, ‘not one drop.’
“‘Will you take some wine?’ rejoined the doctor. ‘You
must take something, or you can never endure the severe operation to which
you must be subjected.’
“‘No,’ exclaimed Joseph, ‘I will not touch one particle
of liquor, neither will I be tied down; but I will tell you what I will do
—I will have my father sit on the bed and hold me in his arms, and
then I will do whatever is necessary in order to have the bone taken out.’
Looking at me, he said, ‘Mother, I want you to leave the room, for I know
you cannot bear to see me suffer so; father can stand it, but you have
carried me so much, and watched over me so long, you are almost worn out.’
Then looking up into my face, his eyes swimming in tears, he continued,
‘Now, mother, promise me that you will not stay, will you? The Lord will
help me, and I shall get through with it.’
“To this request I consented, and getting a number of
folded sheets, and laying them under his leg, I retired, going several
hundred yards from the house in order to be out of hearing.
The Operation
“The surgeons commenced operating by boring into the
bone of his leg, first on one side of the bone where it was affected, then
on the other side, after which they broke it off with a pair of forceps or
pincers. They thus took away large pieces of the bone. When they broke off
the first piece, Joseph screamed out so loudly, that I could not forbear
running to him. On my entering the room, he cried out, ‘Oh, mother, go
back, go back; I do not want you to come in—I will try to tough it
out, if you will go away.’ . . .
“I was immediately forced from the room, and detained
until the operation was complete; but when the act was accomplished,
Joseph put upon a clean bed, the room cleaned of every appearance of
blood, and the instruments which were used in the operation removed, I was
permitted again to enter.
He is Healed
“Joseph immediately commenced getting better, and from
this onward continued to mend until he became strong and healthy. When he
had so far recovered as to be able to travel, he went with his uncle,
Jesse Smith, to Salem, for the benefit of his health, hoping the sea
breezes would be of service to him, and in this he was not disappointed.”
Removal to New York
Continued sickness pursued the family for a year; this,
together with three successive years of crop failure, placed the family in
rather straitened circumstances. So discouraged did they become that the
decision was reached to move to the milder climate and more fertile region
of western New York, where there would be a better opportunity to retrieve
their fortunes.
As soon as arrangements could be made and obligations
settled, Joseph Smith and family moved to Palmyra, New York, a distance of
about three hundred miles from their home in New Hampshire. The members of
the family now counseled together relative to the course they should
adopt. It was finally decided to purchase about one hundred acres of land,
situated about two miles south of Palmyra on the border of Manchester
township. It should be remembered that western New York, at that time, was
sparsely settled. Ohio, Michigan and Illinois were still largely in a
state of wilderness, and beyond the great “Father of Waters” lay a vast
country scarcely known. More than ten years later Missouri was spoken of
by the Lord to Joseph Smith, in a revelation as being on the “borders of
the Lamanites.”1
The Purchase of a Home
At the time of the removal to Palmyra, two of the boys,
Alvin and Hyrum, were able to be of material assistance in making their
new home. With their father they set to work clearing the newly acquired
land from a heavy growth of timber, a condition which generally prevailed
in that country one hundred years ago. During the first year they cleared
about thirty acres—no small task in itself—besides engaging in
a day’s labor now and again, as opportunity afforded, in order to raise
means to meet their obligations. Thus, during the first year, they were
able to meet most of their first payment on the land, which during that
year was not in a condition to be farmed. The mother, through her untiring
industry, took upon herself the task to provide the household necessities,
which she did through the sale of hand-painted oil-cloth table covers, a
work in which she was quite skilled, and in which she met with fair
success.
Removal to Manchester
About four years after the arrival of the Smith family
in Palmyra, they moved to the farm where they built a four-room log house,
which was later increased by the addition of sleeping rooms on the rear.
It was while living in this house that Joseph received his glorious
visions. The building of a more commodious home was contemplated under the
direction of Alvin, the oldest son, who much desired to see his parents
comfortably located. “I am going to have,” he said, “a nice, pleasant room
for father and mother to sit in, and everything arranged for their
comfort, and they shall not work any more as they have done.” This was
indeed a noble thought and desire, for his parents had toiled and labored
much in the midst of trials and tribulations that had reduced them to a
state of poverty.
Death of Alvin Smith
Alvin did not live to realize the blessing thus
contemplated and to see the fulfilment of his dream. The frame of the new
house was raised and the necessary material procured to complete the
structure in the fall of 1824; but in November of that year Alvin was
stricken. He died on the 19th day of that month in the twenty-seventh year
of his age. He lived to know of the visitation of the Father and the Son,
and of the coming of Moroni, and was convinced that these things were
true. He died with a prayer on his lips for his younger brother Joseph,
and admonished him to be true to the great work entrusted to his care.
Alvin is spoken of as a “youth of singular goodness and disposition, kind
and amiable.”
The Hand of Providence
While hard to bear, the many misfortunes of the Smiths
were all overruled by the providence of the Lord, for their good. Had they
remained in Vermont, or New Hampshire, the purposes of the Lord could not
as well have been accomplished. He had a great work for the youthful
Joseph to perform, and it was necessary that the family should move to the
field of his activities. Therefore, through the valley of tribulation they
were led by the hand of the Lord to the place he had prepared for them.
Notes
Doc. and Cov. 54:8.
Chapter 7
Joseph Smith’s Own Story
Never has the story of the wonderful vision of the
Father and the Son to Joseph Smith been told so effectively and clearly as
by Joseph Smith, himself, as he has related it in complete simplicity.
Therefore it is repeated here:
“Some time in the second year after our removal to
Manchester, there was in the place where we lived an unusual excitement on
the subject of religion. It commenced with the Methodists, but soon became
general among all the sects in that region of country. Indeed, the whole
district of country seemed affected by it, and great multitudes united
themselves to the different religious parties, which created no small stir
and division amongst the people, some crying, ‘Lo, here!’ and others, ‘Lo,
there!’ Some were contending for the Methodist faith, some for the
Presbyterian, and some for the Baptist. For notwithstanding the great love
which the converts to these different faiths expressed at the time of
their conversion, and the great zeal manifested by the respective clergy,
who were active in getting up and promoting this extraordinary scene of
religious feeling, in order to have everybody converted as they were
pleased to call it, let them join what sect they pleased—yet when
the converts began to file off, some to one party and some to another, it
was seen that the seemingly good feelings of both the priests and the
converts were more pretended than real; for a scene of great confusion and
bad feeling ensued; priest contending against priest, and convert against
convert; so that all their good feelings one for another, if they ever had
any, were entirely lost in a strife of words and a contest about opinions.
“I was at this time in my fifteenth year. My father’s
family was proselyted to the Presbyterian faith, and four of them joined
that church, namely—my mother Lucy; my brothers Hyrum and Samuel
Harrison; and my sister Sophronia.
A Time of Religious Excitement
“During this time of great excitement, my mind was
called up to serious reflection and great uneasiness; but though my
feelings were deep and often poignant, still I kept myself aloof from all
these parties, though I attended their several meetings as often as
occasion would permit. In process of time my mind became somewhat partial
to the Methodist sect, and I felt some desire to be united with them; but
so great were the confusion and strife among the different denominations,
that it was impossible for a person young as I was, and so unacquainted
with men and things, to come to any certain conclusion who was right and
who was wrong. My mind at times was greatly excited, the cry and tumult
were so great and incessant. The Presbyterians were most decided against
the Baptists and Methodists, and used all the powers of either reason or
sophistry to prove their errors, or, at least to make the people think
they were in error. On the other hand, the Baptists and Methodists in
their turn were equally zealous in endeavoring to establish their own
tenets and disprove all others.
The Promise of James Tested
“In the midst of this war of words and tumult of
opinions, I often said to myself, What is to be done? Who of all these
parties are right; or, are they all wrong together? If any one of them be
right, which is it, and how shall I know it? While I was laboring under
the extreme difficulties caused by the contests of these parties of
religionists, I was one day reading the Epistle of James, first chapter
and fifth verse, which reads: If any of you lack
wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally, and
upbraideth not; and it shall be given him.
“Never did any passage of scripture come with more power
to the heart of man than this did at this time to mine. It seemed to enter
with great force into every feeling of my heart. I reflected on it again
and again, knowing that if any person needed wisdom from God, I did; for
how to act I did not know, and unless I could get more wisdom than I then
had, I would never know; for the teachers of religion of the different
sects understood the same passages of scripture so differently as to
destroy all confidence in settling the question by an appeal to the Bible.
At length I came to the conclusion that I must either remain in darkness
and confusion, or else I must do as James directs, that is, ask of God. I
at length came to the determination to ‘ask of God,’ concluding that if he
gave wisdom to them that lacked wisdom, and would give liberally and not
upbraid, I might venture. So, in accordance with this my determination to
ask of God, I retired to the woods to make the attempt. It was on the
morning of a beautiful clear day, early in the spring of eighteen hundred
and twenty. It was the first time in my life that I had made such an
attempt, for amidst all my anxieties I had never as yet made the attempt
to pray vocally.
The Vision
“After I had retired to the place where I had previously
designed to go, having looked around me, and finding myself alone, I
kneeled down and began to offer up the desires of my heart to God. I had
scarcely done so, when immediately I was seized upon by some power which
entirely overcame me, and had such an astonishing influence over me as to
bind my tongue so that I could not speak. Thick darkness gathered around
me, and it seemed to me for a time as if I were doomed to sudden
destruction.
“But, exerting all my powers to call upon God to deliver
me out of the power of this enemy which had seized upon me, and at the
very moment when I was ready to sink into despair and abandon myself to
destruction—not to an imaginary ruin, but to the power of some
actual being from the unseen world, who had such marvelous power as I had
never before felt in any being—just at this moment of great alarm, I
saw a pillar of light exactly over my head, above the brightness of the
sun, which descended gradually until it fell upon me.
“It no sooner appeared than I found myself delivered
from the enemy which held me bound. When the light rested upon me I saw
two personages, whose brightness and glory defy all description, standing
above me in the air. One of them spake unto me, calling me by name, and
said, pointing to the other—This is my beloved
Son, hear Him!
“My object in going to inquire of the Lord was to know
which of all the sects was right, that I might know which to join. No
sooner, therefore, did I get possession of myself, so as to be able to
speak, than I asked the personages who stood above me in the light, which
of all the sects was right—and which I should join. I was answered
that I must join none of them, for they were all wrong; and the personage
who addressed me said that all their creeds were an abomination in his
sight; that those professors were all corrupt; that ‘they draw near to me
with their lips, but their hearts are far from me; they teach for
doctrines the commandments of men, having a form of godliness but they
deny the power thereof.’ He again forbade me to join with any of them; and
many other things did he say unto me, which I cannot write at this time.
When I came to myself again I found myself lying on my back, looking up
into heaven.
“When the light had departed, I had no strength; but
soon recovering in some degree, I went home. And as I leaned up to the
fireplace, mother enquired what the matter was. I replied, ‘Never mind,
all is well—I am well enough off.’ I then said to my mother, ‘I have
learned for myself that Presbyterianism is not true.’
Sectarian Opposition
“It seems as though the adversary was aware, at a very
early period of my life, that I was destined to prove a disturber and an
annoyer of his kingdom; else why should the powers of darkness combine
against me? Why the opposition and persecution that arose against me
almost in my infancy?
“Some few days after I had this vision, I happened to be
in company with one of the Methodist preachers, who was very active in the
before-mentioned religious excitement; and, conversing with him on the
subject of religion, I took occasion to give him an account of the vision
which I had had. I was greatly surprised at his behavior; he treated my
communication not only lightly, but with great contempt, saying it was all
of the devil, that there were no such things as visions or revelations in
these days; that all such things had ceased with the apostles, and that
there would never be any more of them.
“I soon found, however, that my telling the story had
excited a great deal of prejudice against me among professors of religion,
and was the cause of great persecution, which continued to increase; and
though I was an obscure boy, only between fourteen and fifteen years of
age, and my circumstances in life such as to make a boy of no consequence
in the world, yet men of high standing would take notice sufficient to
excite the public mind against me, and create a bitter persecution; and
this was common among all the sects—all united to persecute me.
Joseph Smith’s Reflections
“It caused me serious reflection then, and often has
since, how very strange it was that an obscure boy, a little over fourteen
years of age and one, too, who was doomed to the necessity of obtaining a
scanty maintenance by his daily labor, should be thought a character of
sufficient importance to attract the attention of the great ones of the
most popular sects of the day, and in a manner to create in them a spirit
of the most bitter persecution and reviling. But strange or not, so it
was, and it was often the cause of great sorrow to myself. However, it was
nevertheless a fact that I had beheld a vision. I have thought since, that
I felt much like Paul, when he made his defense before King Agrippa, and
related the account of the vision he had when he saw a light and heard a
voice; but still there were but few who believed him; some said he was
dishonest, others said he was mad; and he was ridiculed and reviled. But
all this did not destroy the reality of his vision. He had seen a vision,
he knew he had, and all the persecution under heaven could not make it
otherwise; and though they should persecute him unto death, yet he knew,
and would know to his latest breath, that he had both seen a light and
heard a voice speaking unto him, and all the world could not make him
think or believe otherwise.
“So it was with me. I had actually seen a light, and in
the midst of that light I saw two personages, and they did in reality
speak to me; and though I was hated and persecuted for saying that I had
seen a vision, yet it was true; and while they were persecuting me,
reviling me, and speaking all manner of evil against me falsely for so
saying, I was led to say in my heart: Why persecute me for telling the
truth? I have actually seen a vision, and who am I that I can withstand
God, or why does the world think to make me deny what I have actually
seen? For I had seen a vision; I knew it, and I knew that God knew it, and
I could not deny it, neither dared I do it, at least I knew that by so
doing I would offend God, and come under condemnation.
“I had now got my mind satisfied so far as the sectarian
world was concerned; that it was not my duty to join with any of them, but
to continue as I was until further directed. I had found the testimony of
James to be true, that a man who lacked wisdom might ask of God, and
obtain, and not be upbraided.”
Joseph Smith’s Great Honor
There is no account in history or revelation extant,
where ever before both the Father and the Son appeared in the presence of
mortal man in glory. Most wonderful was the honor bestowed upon this
unsophisticated boy. Great was his faith—so great that he was able,
like the brother of Jared, to penetrate the veil and behold the glory of
these holy Beings, whose glory rested upon him. Without this power
overshadowing him, he could not have endured their presence, for their
brightness was far greater than the brightness of the noonday sun. It was
not, therefore, with the power of the natural eye that this great Vision
was beheld, but by the aid of the eye of the spirit. The natural man,
without the saving grace of the power of the Lord, could not behold his
presence in this manner, for he would be consumed. Joseph Smith, through
the power of the Lord, was able to behold the presence of the Great
Creator and his Glorified Son, for they deigned to honor him with their
presence and converse with him.
The Heavens No Longer Sealed
No longer were the heavens as brass. No more would man
be forced to stumble and grope in darkness. Salvation was made known and
the glad tidings were to sound forth, as with the blast of a mighty
trumpet, to the ends of the earth. Satan’s reign was nearing its end, and
the message of eternal peace was shortly to be proclaimed to every nation,
and kindred, and tongue and people.
The Vision Rejected by the World
No wonder Joseph Smith rejoiced, he now possessed
greater knowledge than all the professors and divines in all the world!
Naturally he desired that others should share his joy and partake of his
wonderful information. He would proclaim it to them with gladness, surely
they would be pleased to receive it and would rejoice with him! But great
disappointment awaited him, for with one accord his message was rejected.
Only the members of his household would believe. He was treated with scorn
by great men of learning, although he was but a boy. He was mocked and
shamed. Instead of the spirit of love and gratefulness following him for
revealing this glorious message of truth, it was the spirit of contempt
and hatred with which he had to contend. In sorrow he learned to hold his
peace and wait—wait for further light and inspiration which he had
been promised. Though all the world should mock and former friends deride,
he knew he had beheld the Vision. There was one Friend to whom he now
could go and pour out his soul in humble hope of encouragement and succor.
What did it matter though the whole world should laugh, if the Son of God
would hearken to his humble pleadings?
Not Strange that the Message Should be Rejected
Yet, when we stop to reflect, it is not strange that
this message of light and truth should be rejected by the world, for the
Lord had said long years before, “Men love darkness rather than light,
because their deeds are evil.” As for the priests, was not their craft in
danger? The message left with the youthful seer by the God of heaven was
most drastic. It had been declared in language that could be clearly
understood, that the creeds of men were not in accord with his Gospel.
This was not a message to please the religious teachers of the day.
Moreover, the Vision had shattered the traditions of the times. The
doctrines taught in the churches were emphatically contradicted and
disproved. The world was teaching and believing that the canon of
scripture was full; that there was not to be and could not be, more
revelation; that the visitation of angels had ceased with the early
Christian fathers, and such things as these had passed away forever.
Again, the doctrine was taught that the Father, Son and Holy Ghost were
incomprehensible, without body, parts and passions. A revelation of the
Father and the Son as separate persons, each with a body tangible and in
the form of the body of man, was destructive of this doctrine, as
revelation was of the doctrine of the closed heavens. The world had held
that perfection in religion and the organization of the Church of Christ
was not to be expected, but that men were led by their own human reason to
interpret the word of the Lord as set forth in the scriptures.
A Bold Denunciation of False Doctrine
A bold denunciation of all such false teachings and
traditions, although told in confiding simplicity by a humble youth,
fourteen years of age, was not likely to bring rejoicing and peace of mind
to those who thus believed and loved their old traditions dearly.
Nevertheless the story must be told; for in the world were thousands of
honest souls who were likewise praying that the light of the everlasting
Gospel would be restored, and the message of salvation again be proclaimed
as a witness before the end of unrighteousness should come.
Chapter 8
Life of Joseph Smith Between 1820–23
“I continued to pursue my common vocations in life until
the twenty-first of September, one thousand eight hundred and
twenty-three, all the time suffering severe persecution at the hands of
all classes of men, both religious and irreligious, because I continued to
affirm that I had seen a vision.
“During the space of time which intervened between the
time I had the vision and the year eighteen hundred and twenty-three—
having been forbidden to join any of the religious sects of the day, and
being of very tender years, and persecuted by those who ought to have been
my friends and to have treated me kindly, and if they supposed me to be
deluded to have endeavored in a proper and affectionate manner to have
reclaimed me—I was left to all kinds of temptations; and, mingling
with all kinds of society, I frequently fell into many foolish errors, and
displayed the weakness of youth, and the foibles of human nature; which, I
am sorry to say, led me into divers temptations, offensive in the sight of
God. In making this confession, no one need suppose me guilty of any great
or malignant sins. A disposition to commit such was never in my nature.
But I was guilty of levity, and sometimes associated with jovial company,
etc., not consistent with that character which ought to be maintained by
one who was called of God as I had been. But this will not seem very
strange to any one who recollects my youth, and is acquainted with my
native cheery temperament.
“In consequence of these things, I often felt condemned
for my weakness and imperfections; when, on the evening of the above
mentioned twenty-first of September, after I had retired to my bed for the
night. I betook myself to prayer and supplication to Almighty God for
forgiveness of all my sins and follies, and also for a manifestation to
me, that I might know of my state and standing before him; for I had full
confidence in obtaining a divine manifestation, as I previously had one.
The Appearing of Moroni
“While I was thus in the act of calling upon God, I
discovered a light appearing in my room, which continued to increase until
the room was lighter than at noon day, when immediately a personage
appeared at my bedside, standing in the air, for his feet did not touch
the floor. He had on a loose robe of most exquisite whiteness. It was a
whiteness beyond anything earthly I had ever seen; nor do I believe that
any earthly thing could be made to appear so exceedingly white and
brilliant. His hands were naked, and his arms also, a little above the
wrists; so, also, were his feet naked, as were his legs, a little above
the ankles. His head and neck were also bare. I could discover that he had
no other clothing on but this robe, as it was open, so that I could see
into his bosom. Not only was his robe exceedingly white, but his whole
person was glorious beyond description, and his countenance truly like
lightning. The room was exceedingly light, but not so very bright as
immediately around his person. When I first looked upon him, I was afraid;
but the fear soon left me.
The Book of Mormon Revealed
“He called me by name, and said unto me that he was a
messenger sent from the presence of God to me, and that his name was
Moroni; that God had a work for me to do; and that my name should be had
for good and evil among all nations, kindreds, and tongues, or that it
should be both good and evil spoken of among all people. He said there was
a book deposited, written upon gold plates, giving an account of the
former inhabitants of this continent, and the source from whence they
sprang. He also said that the fulness of the everlasting Gospel was
contained in it, as delivered by the Savior to the ancient inhabitants;
also, that there were two stones in silver bows—and these stones,
fastened to a breast plate, constituted what is called the Urim and Thummim
—deposited with the plates; and the possession and use of these
stones were what constituted seers in ancient or former times; and that
God had prepared them for the purpose of translating the book.
Moroni Quotes Ancient Prophets
“After telling me these things, he commenced quoting the
prophecies of the Old Testament. He first quoted part of the third chapter
of Malachi, and he quoted also the fourth or last chapter of the same
prophecy, though with a little variation from the way it reads in our
Bibles. Instead of quoting the first verse as it reads in our books, he
quoted it thus:
“For behold, the day cometh that
shall burn as an oven and all the proud, yea, and all that do wickedly,
shall burn as stubble; for they that come shall burn them, saith the Lord
of Hosts, that it shall leave them neither root nor branch.
“And again, he quoted the fifth verse thus: Behold, I will reveal unto you the Priesthood, by the hand of
Elijah the prophet, before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the
Lord.
“He also quoted the next verse differently: And he shall plant in the hearts of the children the promises
made to the fathers, and the hearts of the children shall turn to their
fathers; if it were not so, the whole earth would be utterly wasted at its
coming.
“In addition to these, he quoted the eleventh chapter of
Isaiah, saying that it was about to be fulfilled. He quoted also the third
chapter of Acts, twenty-second and twenty-third verses, precisely as they
stand in our New Testament. He said that that prophet was Christ; but the
day had not yet come when they who would not hear his voice should be cut
off from among the people, but soon would come. He also quoted the second
chapter of Joel, from the twenty-eighth verse to the last. He also said
that this was not yet fulfilled, but was soon to be. And he further stated
that the fulness of the Gentiles was soon to come in. He quoted many other
passages of scripture, and offered many explanations which cannot be
mentioned here.
Moroni’s Admonition
“Again, he told me, that when I got those plates of
which he had spoken—for the time that they should be obtained was
not yet fulfilled—I should not show them to any person; neither the
breastplate with the Urim and Thummim; only to those to whom I should be
commanded to show them; if I did I should be destroyed. While he was
conversing with me about the plates, the vision was opened to my mind that
I could see the place where the plates were deposited, and that so clearly
and distinctly that I knew the place again when I visited it.
“After this communication, I saw the light in the room
begin to gather immediately around the person of him who had been speaking
to me, and it continued to do so, until the room was again left dark,
except just around him, when instantly I saw, as it were, a conduit open
right up into heaven, and he ascended till he entirely disappeared, and
the room was left as it had been before this heavenly light had made its
appearance.
The Second Appearance of Moroni
“I lay musing on the singularity of the scene, and
marveling greatly at what had been told to me by this extraordinary
messenger; when, in the midst of my meditation, I suddenly discovered that
my room was again beginning to get lighted, and in an instant, as it were,
the same heavenly messenger was again by my bedside.
“He commenced, and again related the very same things
which he had done at his first visit, without the least variation; which
having done, he informed me of great judgments which were coming upon the
earth, with great desolations by famine, sword, and pestilence; and that
these grievous judgments would come on the earth in this generation.
Having related these things, he again ascended as he had done before.
The Third Appearance of Moroni
“By this time, so deep were the impressions made on my
mind, that sleep had fled from my eyes, and I lay overwhelmed in
astonishment at what I had both seen and heard. But what was my surprise
when again I beheld the same messenger at my bedside, and heard him
rehearse or repeat over again to me the same things as before; and added a
caution to me, telling me that Satan would try to tempt me (in consequence
of the indigent circumstances of my father’s family), to get the plates
for the purpose of getting rich. This he forbade me, saying that I must
have no other object in view in getting the plates but to glorify God, and
must not be influenced by any other motive than that of building His
kingdom; otherwise I could not get them. After this third visit, he again
ascended into heaven as before, and I was again left to ponder on the
strangeness of what I had just experienced; when almost immediately after
the heavenly messenger had ascended from me the third time, the cock
crowed, and I found that day was approaching, so that our interviews must
have occupied the whole of that night.
The Fourth Appearance of Moroni
“I shortly after arose from my bed, and, as usual, went
to the necessary labors of the day; but, in attempting to work as at other
times, I found my strength so exhausted as to render me entirely unable.
My father, who was laboring along with me, discovered something to be
wrong with me, and told me to go home. I started with the intention of
going to the house; but, in attempting to cross the fence out of the field
where we were, my strength entirely failed me, and I fell helpless on the
ground, and for a time was quite unconscious of anything. The first thing
that I can recollect was a voice speaking unto me, calling me by name. I
looked up, and beheld the same messenger standing over my head, surrounded
by light as before. He then again related unto me all that he had related
to me the previous night, and commanded me to go to my father and tell him
of the vision and commandments which I had received. I obeyed; I returned
to my father in the field, and rehearsed the whole matter to him. He
replied to me that it was of God, and told me to go and do as commanded by
the messenger. I left the field, and went to the place where the messenger
had told me the plates were deposited; and owing to the distinctness of
the vision which I had had concerning it, I knew the place the instant
that I arrived there.
The Hill Cumorah
“Convenient to the village of Manchester, Ontario
county, New York, stands a hill of considerable size, and the most
elevated of any in the neighborhood. On the west side of this hill, not
far from the top, under a stone of considerable size, lay the plates,
deposited in a stone box. This stone was thick and rounding in the middle
on the upper side, and thinner towards the edges, so that the middle part
of it was visible above the ground, but the edge all around was covered
with earth.
“Having removed the earth, I obtained a lever, which I
got fixed under the edge of the stone, and with a little exertion raised
it up. I looked in, and there indeed did I behold the plates, the Urim and
Thummim, and the breastplate, as stated by the messenger. The box in which
they lay was formed by laying stones together in some kind of cement. In
the bottom of the box were laid two stones crossways of the box, and on
these stones lay the plates and the other things with them.
“I made an attempt to take them out, but was forbidden
by the messenger, and was again informed that the time for bringing them
forth had not yet arrived, neither would it, until four years from that
time; but he told me that I should come to that place precisely in one
year from that time, and that he would there meet with me, and that I
should continue to do so until the time should come for obtaining the
plates.
The Four Annual Visits to the Hill
“Accordingly, as I had been commanded, I went at the end
of each year, and at each time I found the same messenger there, and
received instruction and intelligence from him at each of our interviews,
respecting what the Lord was going to do, and how and in what manner His
kingdom was to be conducted in the last days.
“As my father’s worldly circumstances were very limited,
we were under the necessity of laboring with our hands, hiring out by
day’s work and otherwise, as we could get opportunity. Sometimes we were
at home and sometimes abroad, and by continued labor, were enabled to get
a comfortable maintenance.”
Temptation of Joseph Smith
As Joseph Smith journeyed to the Hill Cumorah on that
memorable first visit, he was beset by many conflicting emotions. His
father’s family was poor and in financial distress. Creditors had been
bearing down heavily upon them. The adversary of all righteousness took
advantage of these conditions to sorely tempt the youth with all his
power. The plates of the book were made of gold and were of great
intrinsic value. Could they not be used to relieve the financial
embarrassment of the family? Or was there not some thing else deposited
with the plates that might be used for such purpose? Such were the
thoughts Satan put into his heart as he approached the hill, and the
admonition of the angel was temporarily forgotten.
He had no difficulty in locating the spot where the
records were hidden.1 It was the matter of but a moment to scrape
away the grass and dirt and with a lever pry loose the stone which served
as a covering to the box containing the sacred treasure. There before him,
lying on two stones which were crosswise of the box, he beheld the record.
With it were the Urim and Thummim, two transparent stones set in bows of
silver and attached to the breastplate—all as the angel had
described. He was enraptured. Putting forth his hand he attempted to
remove the plates, but received a shock, which in a measure deprived him
of his strength. After a moment’s hesitation he made a second attempt, but
received a greater shock than at first. The cause of this was unknown to
him, for he had supposed that physical strength and exertion were all that
were necessary for him to obtain the record. The third time he stretched
forth his hand to take the plates and again received a shock with
considerable violence, which sapped his strength and made him powerless.
In his great excitement and without meditation he exclaimed: “Why cannot I
obtain the book?” “Because you have not kept the commandments of the
Lord,” answered a voice near by him. Looking up he was astonished to
behold the heavenly messenger of his former visits.
Powers of Good and Evil Shown
In humble repentance he sought the Lord in prayer. His
vision was opened and the glory of the Lord shone round about him, and he
was made to feel the sweet influence of the power of righteousness. While
he was beholding this vision the angel said, “Look!” Joseph beheld the
prince of darkness surrounded by his innumerable train of associates in
all their diabolical fury. As the visions of evil passed before him the
angel said: “All this is shown, the good and the evil, the holy and
impure, the glory of God and the power of darkness, that you may know
hereafter the two powers and never be influenced or overcome by that
wicked one. Behold, whatever entices and leads to good and to do good, is
of God, and whatever does not is of that wicked one. It is he who fills
the hearts of men with evil, to walk in darkness and blaspheme God; and
you may learn from henceforth, that his ways are to destruction; but the
way of holiness is peace and rest.”2
Joseph was further informed that the record had been
deposited for the sake of the glory of the Lord, for they contained the
fulness of the Gospel as it was given to the ancient inhabitants of this
American continent, and was to be brought forth by the power of God; and
moreover that the translation would go forth to the Gentiles, many of whom
would believe—afterwards it should go to the house of Israel many of
whom should also be brought into the Church of Christ.
Value of the Prophet’s Lesson
The lesson taught to Joseph Smith on this occasion was
one of lasting benefit to him. Henceforth he understood the power of the
evil one and was prepared to resist temptation. Years afterwards, when
speaking of this event he said, “Ever afterwards I was willing to keep the
commandments of God.” Had the lesson not been taught in this manner, at a
later day he might have fallen into temptation when off his guard, with
results that would have brought disaster.
The Interval of Four Years
During the interval of four years, from 1823 to 1827,
Joseph Smith was under the necessity of aiding his father’s family in
paying their debts and procuring a living. At times he found employment at
home and at times abroad, as opportunity afforded. The death of his oldest
brother Alvin, in 1824, made it all the more needful that he exert himself
for the benefit of the family. In October, 1825, he entered the employ of
an aged gentleman named Josiah Stowel. Mr. Stowel had heard of some old
Spanish silver mines in Harmony, Pennsylvania, and employed his hired help
in searching for the hidden treasure. Joseph, after about one month of
fruitless search, persuaded this kindly gentleman to forsake the foolish
venture. From this employment came the cry that Joseph Smith, the “Mormon”
Prophet, was a “money-digger.”
The Prophet’s Marriage
While residing in Harmony and in the employment of Mr.
Stowel, Joseph boarded at the home of Mr. Isaac Hale. It was here, and
under these conditions, that he met Miss Emma Hale, daughter of Isaac
Hale. The friendship of these young people ripened into love, and they
were married about one year and three months later, January 18, 1827, by
Squire Tarbill, in South Bainbridge, New York.
Notes
1.
The following description of Cumorah is from the pen of Oliver Cowdery:
You are acquainted with the
mail road from Palmyra, Wayne County, to Canandaigua, Ontario County, New
York, and also, as you pass from the former to the latter place, before
arriving at the little village of Manchester, say from three to four, or
about four miles from Palmyra, you pass a large hill on the east side of
the road. Why I say large, is because it is as large, perhaps, as any in
that country. To a person acquainted with this road a description would be
unnecessary, as it is the largest and rises the highest of any on that
route. The north end rises quite sudden until it assumes a level with the
more southerly extremity, and I think I may say an elevation higher than
at the south a short distance, say half or three-fourths of a mile. As you
pass toward Canandaigua it lessens gradually until the surface assumes its
common level, or is broken by other smaller hills or ridges, water courses
and ravines. I think I am justified in saying that this is the highest
hill for some distance round, and I am certain that its appearance, as it
rises so suddenly from a plain on the north, must attract the notice of
the traveler as he passes by. —Messenger and
Advocate, 1834, page 158.
See Improvement Era, vol. 2, p. 807.
Chapter 9
Priesthood Restored
Joseph Receives the Record
Each year, on the twenty-second day of September,
between the years 1823 and 1827, Joseph went to the Hill Cumorah, as the
angel had instructed him, where he was taught in matters pertaining to his
sacred duties. At last the time arrived for the delivery of the plates,
the Urim and Thummim, and the breastplate. It was the 22nd day of
September, 1827. The Prophet went to the hill to keep the final
appointment with Moroni, before the record should be given into his hands.
Once more the angel instructed him in his duties and impressed upon his
mind the great responsibility now to be placed upon him, saying:
“Now you have got the record into your own hands, and
you are but a man, therefore you will have to be watchful and faithful
to your trust or you will be overpowered by wicked men; for they will
lay every plan and scheme that is possible to get it away from you, and
if you do not take heed continually, they will succeed. While it was in
my hands, I could keep it, and no man had power to take it away, but now
I give it up to you. Beware, and look well to your ways, and you shall
have power to retain it.”1
Moreover, he was told, if he let the record go out of
his hands or neglected his duty, he should be cut off, but through
faithfulness and perseverance he should be protected until the angel
should come for the record and again take it into his keeping.
Designs of the Wicked Frustrated
Joseph soon found that the warning of the angel was all
too true concerning the powers of darkness being arrayed against him, and
the desire of evil-disposed persons to destroy him and obtain the plates.
Scarcely was the record in his possession before strenuous exertions were
made by wicked persons to get them out of his hands. Every scheme and
invention which the powers of darkness could devise, were used. Conjurors,
diviners with peepstones and other means were employed. Mobs gathered and
searched the premises of the Smith home, even breaking into the house and
ransacking it. Under pretext of law searches were made. At times it became
necessary to hide the record in strange places. Once they were hidden in a
hollow log in the woods; again, under the hearthstone in the house, and
under the floor in a nearby shop. When the Prophet departed for
Pennsylvania he hid them in a barrel of beans, and when a search was made
they were not discovered. The Lord was with him in his labor and the
powers of darkness were overcome and of no avail.
Martin Harris
So intense and bitter became the opposition in
Manchester that the Prophet sought a place of refuge in another locality.
Having received an invitation from his wife’s parents to come to their
home in Harmony, Pennsylvania, he accepted the invitation and prepared to
go. Being very poor he experienced some difficulty in procuring the
necessary means to meet his obligations and make the journey. In this hour
of distress, and in the midst of persecution, he found a friend in Martin
Harris, of Palmyra, New York. Joseph, with his wife’s brother, Alva Hale,
had gone to Palmyra to transact some business, and while there he was
approached by Martin Harris, who said to him: “How do you do, Mr. Smith?
Here are fifty dollars. I give this to you to do the Lord’s work with; no,
I give it to the Lord for His own work.” Joseph offered to take the money
and give his note which Alva Hale also agreed to sign, but Martin Harris
refused to take the note. This money enabled the Prophet to make the
journey to Harmony where he found a haven of rest.
Removal to Pennsylvania
Shortly after this event Joseph moved to Harmony,
Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania, to the home of Isaac Hale. Later he
purchased from Mr. Hale a small farm, to which he removed. Here in
comparative peace he commenced to make a copy of the characters on the
plates, which consisted of the learning of the Jews and the language, in
hieroglyphics, of the Egyptians. He also, by Urim and Thummim, made a
translation of some of them. This was done between December, 1827, and the
February following. In the month of February, 1828, Martin Harris came to
Harmony to visit with Joseph Smith. He had been much impressed with the
Prophet’s story and desired to know more concerning the work.
The Prophecy of Isaiah Fulfilled
Martin Harris took the transcript that had been made
together with the partial translation, and departed for New York. Just
what his object was, and what he had in mind, is not made clear. That he
was led to do so by inspiration was later shown. He first submitted the
characters to Professor Charles Anthon of Columbia College with the
request that he examine them. He then took them to Dr. Samuel L. Mitchell,
also of New York. When Martin returned he made the following report:
“I went to the city of New York, and presented the
characters which had been translated, with the translation thereof, to
Professor Charles Anthon, a gentleman celebrated for his literary
attainments. Professor Anthon stated that the translation was correct,
more so than any he had before seen translated from the Egyptian. I then
showed him those which were not yet translated, and he said that they
were Egyptian, Chaldaic, Assyrian and Arabic; and he said they were true
characters. He gave me a certificate, certifying to the people of
Palmyra that they were true characters, and that the translation of such
of them as had been translated was also correct. I took the certificate
and put it into my pocket, and was just leaving the house when Mr.
Anthon called me back, and asked me how the young man found out that
there were gold plates in the place where he found them. I answered that
an angel of God had revealed it unto him.“He then said to me, ‘Let me see that certificate.’ I
accordingly took it out of my pocket and gave it to him, when he took it
and tore it to pieces, saying, that there was no such thing now as
ministering of angels, and that if I would bring the plates to him, he
would translate them. I informed him that part of the plates were
sealed, and that I was forbidden to bring them. He replied, ‘I cannot
read a sealed book.’ I left him and went to Mr. Mitchell, who sanctioned
what Professor Anthon had said respecting both the characters and the
translation.”
A number of years later, when he discovered the use to
which his testimony had been given, Professor Anthon denied the statement
of Martin Harris, although he did confess that such a person called to see
him with such characters, but he treated it as a hoax. There may be some
slight errors in the account of Martin Harris, but in the main his story
must be true for it is the fulfilment of an ancient prophecy of Isaiah2
almost word for word. It is not likely that Martin Harris was
familiar with the prophecy of Isaiah at that time and without question
Professor Anthon had no intention of fulfilling prophecy in making his
answer, but nevertheless such proved to be the case.
The Lost Manuscript
The impression made on the mind of Martin Harris by this
interview resulted in his removal to Harmony to give further aid to Joseph
Smith. He arrived about the 12th of April, 1828, and immediately commenced
to write as the Prophet dictated his translation of the record. Martin
continued in this work until the 14th of June, at which time one hundred
and sixteen pages of manuscript on foolscap paper had been prepared. Some
time after Martin Harris commenced to write he importuned the Prophet for
the privilege of taking the manuscript home and showing it to some
skeptical friends, who had sorely criticized him for the part he was
taking in the work. He was desirous of convincing them; and they had,
without doubt, pleaded with him to do this thing. Especially had his wife
implored him for a look at the manuscript.
The Prophet inquired by Urim and Thummim, and the
request of Martin was denied. However he was not satisfied and importuned
and pleaded with Joseph again to inquire of the Lord. This he did, but the
answer was the same as before. Still Martin implored, and so insistent and
prolonged were his pleadings that Joseph Smith again, the third time,
inquired of the Lord. This time the answer was favorable. The request was
granted on certain positive conditions. Martin was to show the manuscript
to his brother, Preserved Harris, his wife, his father and mother and his
wife’s sister, Mrs. Cobb. No other person was to see the writings. In a
most solemn covenant Martin bound himself to this agreement. When he
arrived home, and pressure was brought to bear upon him, he forgot his
solemn oath and permitted others to view the manuscript, with the result
that by stratagem it passed out of his hands.
The Lord was displeased with Joseph Smith for his
constant importuning, and took from him the Urim and Thummim after the
departure of Martin Harris with the partial translation from the plates.
When the fact was known that Martin had lost the manuscript, the Prophet
suffered the torments of the damned. He found no rest; there was no peace
of conscience. In the bitterness of his soul he feared to approach the
Lord. This condition continued for some time until one day the angel
appeared to him, and returned the Urim and Thummim, that he might through
them receive a revelation from the Lord. (Doc. & Cov. Sec. 3.) In this
revelation it was made known that the purposes of the Lord were not
frustrated, but the designs of men. Joseph was soundly rebuked and warned
against yielding to temptation. Nevertheless the mercy of the Lord was
extended to him because of his severe punishment and sore repentance.
After the revelation was received, both the Urim and Thummim and the
plates were taken from him, but in a few days were restored again. This
was the most bitter lesson Joseph Smith ever received. It seemed necessary
to prepare him for the great responsibilities yet before him.
A few days later Joseph received another revelation
(Doc. and Cov. Sec. 10) in which he was forbidden again to translate the
portion of the record which had been lost. Satan had put it into the
hearts of wicked men, the revelation declared, to alter the writing of the
manuscript and then, if Joseph Smith should translate again, they would
say that he could not do it twice alike, and thus they would catch him in
his words which he had pretended to translate.
What the Lost Record Contained
The lost manuscript contained the abridgment made by
Mormon of the record of Nephi, from the time Lehi left Jerusalem down to
the reign of King Benjamin, or to the words of Mormon, in the Book of
Mormon. When Mormon made his abridgment of the records of the Nephites,
the Lord directed him to attach also the small plates of Nephi, which
contained the record of the people covering the same period of time as the
abridgment down to the reign of King Benjamin. In this manner there were
two accounts of that history, the abridgment and the original. Now the
translation of the abridgment was lost; but the better account could still
be translated, and the designs of Satan be defeated. Thus the “wise
purpose” of the Lord, in directing Mormon to include Nephi’s plates, was
made known to Joseph Smith.
The Coming of Oliver Cowdery
Martin Harris was never permitted to act as scribe
again. For a time the Prophet was without assistance. For several months
he was under the necessity of “laboring with his hands” on his small farm
in Harmony and otherwise seeking employment. The work of the Lord was
lagging. He must be about his mission. He prayed to the Lord for help. On
the 6th of April, 1829, a young school teacher, Oliver Cowdery, came to
Harmony to inquire of Joseph Smith regarding his work. Oliver Cowdery had
been teaching school near the home of the Smiths in Manchester, and part
of the time boarded with that family. From them he learned of the
Prophet’s vision, the coming of Moroni, and of the plates. He had a
feeling that these stories were true and desired to investigate at close
quarters. He was convinced of the truth of Joseph’s story, and two days
after his arrival in Harmony commenced to write as the Prophet translated
from the record. Later in the month of April the Lord gave to Oliver a
revelation through Joseph Smith in which he was called to the work. In
that revelation things were revealed that only Oliver Cowdery knew. From
that time forth he continued to act as the amanuensis for Joseph Smith,
until the Book of Mormon was finished.
Restoration of the Aaronic Priesthood
While translating, Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery
discovered that the question of baptism for the remission of sins was
mentioned several times in the record. This caused them to marvel, for the
doctrine of baptism was misunderstood in the world. They concluded to
inquire of the Lord for light. On the 15th day of May, 1829, they retired
to the woods and prayed for instruction on this question. While thus
engaged in prayer a heavenly messenger descended in a cloud of light and
said that he was John, known as John the Baptist in the New Testament. He
said he acted under the direction of Peter, James and John, who held the
keys of the Melchizedek Priesthood, and had been sent to confer on Joseph
and Oliver the Aaronic Priesthood, which holds the keys of the temporal
Gospel. He laid his hands upon their heads and said:
“Upon you my fellow servants, in the name of Messiah,
I confer the Priesthood of Aaron, which holds the keys of the
ministering of angels, and of the Gospel of repentance, and of baptism
by immersion for the remission of sins; and this shall never be taken
again from the earth, until the sons of Levi do offer again an offering
unto the Lord in righteousness.”
He stated that the Melchizedek Priesthood would soon he
conferred upon them and that Joseph Smith should be called the first and
Oliver Cowdery the second elder of the Church.
Joseph and Oliver Baptized
This messenger, after conferring the Priesthood,
instructed Joseph and Oliver to go down into the water and baptize each
other. After which they were to lay hands upon each other and re-confer
the Priesthood which he had bestowed upon them. There are two reasons why
they should be commanded to do this thing. First, to confer the Priesthood
before baptism, is contrary to the order of the Organized Church,
therefore they were commanded to confer the Priesthood upon each other in
the regular way, after they were baptized. Second, the angel did for them
that which they could not do for themselves. There was no one living in
mortality who held the keys of this Priesthood, therefore it was necessary
that this messenger, who held the keys of the Aaronic Priesthood in the
Dispensation of the Meridian of Time, should be sent to confer this power.
It is contrary to the order of heaven for those who have passed beyond the
veil to officiate and labor for the living on the earth, only wherein
mortal man cannot act, and thereby it becomes necessary for those who have
passed through the resurrection to act for them. Otherwise John would have
followed the regular order, which is practiced in the Church, and would
have first baptized Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery and then conferred
upon them the Aaronic Priesthood.
As the angel had commanded them, they repaired to the
water where Joseph first baptized Oliver and then Oliver baptized Joseph.
Immediately after coming out of the water they experienced great and
glorious blessings, and being filled with the Holy Spirit, began to
prophesy of the coming forth of the Church and the establishment of the
great work of the Lord in the latter days. Their minds were now
enlightened and the scriptures were opened to their understandings. For
the first time in many centuries there now stood on the earth men with
power to officiate in baptism for the remission of sin.
The fear of opposition compelled them to keep secret the
matter of their ordination and baptism, except where they revealed it to a
few personal friends, whom they could trust.
Restoration of the Melchizedek Priesthood
In course of time, and very shortly after the coming of
John the Baptist, Joseph and Oliver received the Melchizedek Priesthood
from Peter, James and John. The date when this Priesthood was conferred is
unknown, but it was only a few days after the first ordination. In a
revelation given in 1842 (Doc. & Cov. Sec. 128) we are informed that
it was between Harmony, Pennsylvania, and Colesville, New York, on the
Susquehanna River, where it was conferred. In another revelation given in
September 1830, we are informed that the restoration was under the hands
of Peter, James and John, “whom I have sent unto you, by whom I have
ordained you and confirmed you to be apostles, and special witnesses of my
name” (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 27).
Help from Joseph Knight
While the work of translating was going on the Lord sent
a friend in time of need to give material assistance to Joseph Smith and
Oliver Cowdery. This was Joseph Knight, Sen., of Colesville, Broome
County, New York. Having heard of the manner in which Joseph and Oliver
were occupying their time, Mr. Knight brought them provisions from time to
time, a distance of some thirty miles, and thus enabled them to continue
their labor without interruption, which otherwise would have delayed the
work.
Joseph and Oliver Remove to Fayette
It was not destined that the work of translation should
go on in Harmony without interruption. Opposition finally made itself
manifest and became so strong that even Isaac Hale—a man who
believed in justice, law and order, but who did not express much faith in
the mission of Joseph Smith—became somewhat bitter in his feelings.
The necessity of a change of residence was apparent. Oliver Cowdery wrote
to a young friend, David Whitmer of Fayette, New York, with whom he had
previously corresponded regarding the coming forth of the Book of Mormon,
desiring that he would come and take Joseph and himself to the Whitmer
home in Fayette. This David Whitmer consented to do, and the removal was
made in June, 1829.
When David was on the journey to Harmony on this
mission, he was met some distance from the town of Harmony by Joseph and
Oliver. In referring to this circumstance some years later, David Whitmer
wrote: “Oliver told me that Joseph had informed him when I started from
home, where I stopped the first night, how I read the sign at the tavern,
where I stopped the next night, etc., and that I would be there that day
for dinner, and this is why they had come out to meet me. All of which was
exactly as Joseph had told Oliver, at which I was greatly astonished” (Millennial Star, vol. 40:769–774).
At the Whitmer Home
When they arrived in Fayette, they found Mr. Peter
Whitmer, father of David, ready to receive them and anxious to know more
concerning the work, Joseph and Oliver received their board free at the
Whitmer home, and other timely assistance was also given them by members
of the Whitmer family. David, John and Peter Whitmer, Jr., became very
zealous in the work. The Lord spoke to each of them by revelation, calling
them to cry repentance to their generation. The people of Seneca County,
in which Fayette was situated, were friendly, and many houses were opened
by those desiring to know more of the Prophet’s message. Many were
convinced and showed a willingness to obey the Gospel. Hyrum Smith, who
had come to Fayette, David Whitmer and Peter Whitmer, Jr., were baptized,
the first by the Prophet and the others by Oliver Cowdery. Samuel H.
Smith, younger brother of the Prophet, had been baptized while the Prophet
and Oliver were in Harmony, Pennsylvania. He was the third person baptized
in this dispensation, receiving the remission of his sins on the
twenty-fifth day of May, 1829, just ten days after the appearing of John
the Baptist; Oliver Cowdery baptizing him. Samuel had accompanied Oliver
from Manchester to Harmony early in April when Oliver came to inquire
concerning the Prophet and the record he claimed to have, and remained
with his brother Joseph during the spring. Samuel Smith had not taken to
the Prophet’s story as readily as other members of the family, and was
rather hard to convince that Joseph and Oliver had been ordained and
baptized. After much inquiry and explanation by Joseph and Oliver, Samuel
retired alone to the woods, and in secret prayer obtained a revelation for
himself. Now convinced, he was anxious to be baptized and to engage in the
work of establishing “the cause of Zion.”
Notes
History of the Prophet Joseph, p. 106, Lucy
Smith.
2. Isaiah’s prophecy is as follows: “And the vision
of all is become unto you as the words of a book that is sealed, which men
deliver to one that is learned, saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he
saith, I cannot; for it is sealed: And the book is delivered to him that
is not learned, saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I am not
learned. Wherefore the Lord said, Forasmuch as this people draw near me
with their mouth, and with their lips do honor me, but have removed their
heart far from me, and their fear toward me is taught by the precept of
men: Therefore behold, I will proceed to do a marvelous work among this
people, even a marvelous work and a wonder; for the wisdom of their wise
men shall perish, and the understanding of their prudent men shall be hid”
(Isa. 29:11–14).
For a discussion of this point see the History of the Mormon Church, by B. H. Roberts,
chapter 8. Also Orson Pratt’s Works, Chapter 6,
and the Book of Mormon, 2 Nephi, 27th chapter.
Chapter 10
The Witnesses Called
In due time, in June 1829, the Book of Mormon
translation was finished. Three special witnesses must now be chosen who
should behold the plates through divine favor and bear record to the
world. This was according to the predictions of the ancient prophets who
had kept the records of the Nephites. Nephi, son of Lehi, had prophesied:
“Wherefore at that day when the book shall be delivered unto the man of
whom I have spoken, the book shall be hid from the eyes of the world, that
the eyes of none shall behold it save it be that three witnesses shall
behold it, by the power of God, besides him to whom the book shall be
delivered; and they shall testify to the truth of the book and the things
therein. And there is none other which shall view it, save it be a few
according to the will of God, to bear testimony of his word unto the
children of men; for the Lord God hath said that the words of the faithful
should speak as if it were from the dead.”1
In a revelation given at the request of Martin Harris,
after his repentance, in March, 1829 (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 5), this
statement is reiterated, and Martin was told he might be granted this
great privilege of being one of the witnesses, if he would humble himself
sufficiently and overcome his pride in mighty prayer and sincerity of
heart, and acknowledge the things he had done which were wrong. It was
natural for Oliver Cowdery, the Prophet’s scribe, and David Whitmer, to
desire to be the two other witnesses of the special three.
When the translation was finished Joseph wrote to his
parents requesting them to come to him. This information they conveyed to
Martin Harris at Palmyra, who desired to accompany them. The next day
after the word was received they started on the journey. The evening of
their arrival at the Whitmer home was spent in reading the manuscript of
the Book of Mormon, which caused them all to rejoice exceedingly. They had
not previously realized the magnitude of the work of translation, nor had
they received a clear understanding of what the book contained.
When the time arrived for the manifestation of the power
of the Lord to the witnesses, as was the custom, early in the morning the
little group at the Whitmer home engaged in singing and prayer. At the
close of these services Joseph Smith arose and approaching Martin Harris
said: “Martin Harris, you have got to humble yourself before God this day,
that you may obtain a forgiveness of your sins. If you do, it is the will
of God that you should look upon the plates, in company with Oliver
Cowdery and David Whitmer.” Lucy Smith, the Prophet’s mother, who was
present, says this was spoken, “with a solemnity that thrills through and
through my veins to this day, when it occurs to my recollection.”
These three men earnestly sought for the privilege of
being the special witnesses, Joseph laid the matter before the Lord and
received a revelation by Urim and Thummim granting their petition. The
revelation is as follows:
Revelation to the Witnesses
“Behold, I say unto you, that you must rely upon my
word, which if you do with full purpose of heart, you shall have a view
of the plates, and also of the breastplate, the sword of Laban, the Urim
and Thummim, which were given to the brother of Jared upon the mount,
when he talked with the Lord face to face, and the miraculous directors
which were given to Lehi while in the wilderness, on the borders of the
Red Sea.“And it is by your faith that you shall obtain a view
of them, even by that faith which was had by the prophets of old.“And after that you have obtained faith, and have seen
them with your eyes, you shall testify of them, by the power of God;“And this you shall do that my servant Joseph Smith,
Jun., may not be destroyed, that I may bring about my righteous purposes
unto the children of men in this work.“And ye shall testify that you have seen them, even as
my servant Joseph Smith, Jun., has seen them, for it is by my power that
he has seen them, and it is because he had faith.“And he has translated the book, even that part which
I have commanded him, and as your Lord and your God liveth it is true.“Wherefore, you have received the same power, and the
same faith, and the same gift like unto him;“And if you do these last commandments of mine, which
I have given you, the gates of hell shall not prevail against you; for
my grace is sufficient for you, and you shall be lifted up at the last
day.“And I, Jesus Christ, your Lord and your God, have
spoken it unto you, that I might bring about my righteous purposes unto
the children of men. Amen” (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 17).
The Witnesses Behold the Plates
A short time after this revelation was given these four,
Joseph Smith, Oliver Cowdery, David Whitmer and Martin Harris, retired to
the woods and engaged in humble prayer. They asked the Lord to bestow upon
them the blessing of the promise. Each prayed in turn, according to
previous agreement. Joseph prayed first and after each had prayed and no
answer of divine favor was obtained, they again observed the same order of
prayer, but without result. Feeling it was because of his transgressions
that no answer was received, Martin Harris suggested that he would
withdraw from the others. After consultation this was agreed to, and
Martin withdrew. Again the three knelt in prayer. Presently they beheld
above them a light of great brilliancy, and an angel descended and stood
before them. In his hand he held the plates, and before them were the
other records and sacred things spoken of in the revelation. The angel
took the golden book and turning leaf by leaf exhibited to the witnesses
the engravings thereon. He then turned to David Whitmer and said, “David,
blessed is the Lord, and he that keeps his commandments.” Immediately
after this they heard a voice in the bright light which shone above them,
saying: “These plates have been revealed by the power of God, and they
have been translated by the power of God. The translation of them which
you have seen is correct, and I command you to bear record of what you now
see and hear.”
Joseph Smith now left Oliver and David and went in
search of Martin Harris. He found him at a considerable distance fervently
petitioning the Lord in prayer. With earnestness he pleaded with Joseph to
join him that he too might be blessed with a vision of the plates. Joseph
readily consented, and before they had prayed very long the same vision
burst upon their presence and they beheld the same messenger. The angel
again turned the leaves one by one and the same scene was re-enacted.
Martin Harris was overjoyed and cried out: “’Tis enough; ’tis enough; mine
eyes have beheld; mine eyes have beheld!” Jumping up he shouted hosannah
and praised the Lord.
When they returned from this interview it was between
three and four o’clock in the afternoon. The incident is related by the
Prophet’s mother in the following words:
“On coming in, Joseph threw himself down beside me,
and exclaimed, ‘Father, mother, you do not know how happy I am: the Lord
has now caused the plates to be shown to three more besides myself. They
have seen an angel, who has testified to them, and they will have to
bear witness to the truth of what I have said, for now they know for
themselves, that I do not go about to deceive the people, and I feel as
if I was relieved of a burden which was almost too heavy for me to bear;
and it rejoices my soul, that I am not any longer to be entirely alone
in the world. Upon this, Martin Harris came in; he seemed almost
overcome with joy, and testified boldly to what he had both seen and
heard. And so did David and Oliver, adding, that no tongue could express
the joy of their hearts, and the greatness of the things which they had
both seen and heard.”2
Testimony of the Three Witnesses
In accord with the instructions they received in the
revelation and by direct command from the voice of the Lord when they
viewed the plates, the three witnesses gave to the world their united
testimony in writing. This testimony, together with the testimony of eight
other witnesses who also beheld the plates, has been published in every
copy of the Book of Mormon as a witness to the unbelieving world. Their
testimony is as follows:
“Be it known unto all nations, kindreds, tongues, and
people, unto whom this work shall come: That we, through the grace of
God the Father, and our Lord Jesus Christ, have seen the plates which
contain this record, which is the record of the people of Nephi, and
also of the Lamanites, their brethren, and also of the people of Jared,
who came from the tower of which hath been spoken. And we also know that
they have been translated by the gift and power of God, for his voice
hath declared it unto us; wherefore we know of a surety that the work is
true. And we also testify that we have seen the engravings which are
upon the plates; and they have been shown unto us by the power of God,
and not of man. And we declare with words of soberness, that an angel of
God came down from heaven, and he brought and laid before our eyes, that
we beheld and saw the plates, and the engravings thereon; and we know
that it is by the grace of God the Father, and our Lord Jesus Christ,
that we beheld and bear record that these things are true. And it is
marvelous in our eyes. Nevertheless, the voice of the Lord commanded us
that we should bear record of it; wherefore, to be obedient unto the
commandments of God, we bear testimony of these things. And we know that
if we are faithful in Christ, we shall rid our garments of the blood of
all men, and be found spotless before the judgment seat of Christ, and
shall dwell with him eternally in the heavens. And the honor be to the
Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Ghost, which is one God. Amen.Oliver Cowdery,
David Whitmer,
Martin Harris.”
Testimony of the Eight Witnesses
In addition to the testimony of the three witnesses,
eight other witnesses were called to view the plates and to give testimony
to the world, and became the “few according to the will of God, to bear
testimony of his word unto the children of men.” These eight men did not
obtain the same privilege as the three special witnesses, for it was not
in the presence of an angel that they beheld the record, but they were
shown the plates by Joseph Smith by command of the Lord. Their testimony
is as follows:
“Be it known unto all nations, kindreds, tongues, and
people, unto whom this work shall come: That Joseph Smith, Jun., the
translator of this work, has shown unto us the plates of which hath been
spoken, which have the appearance of gold; and as many of the leaves as
the said Smith has translated we did handle with our hands; and we also
saw the engravings thereon, all of which has the appearance of ancient
work, and of curious workmanship. And this we bear record with words of
soberness, that the said Smith has shown unto us, for we have seen and
hefted, and know of a surety that the said Smith has got the plates of
which we have spoken. And we give our names unto the world, to witness
unto the world that which we have seen. And we lie not, God bearing
witness of it.Christian Whitmer,
Jacob Whitmer,
Peter Whitmer, Jun.,
John Whitmer,
Hiram Page,
Joseph Smith, Sen.,
Hyrum Smith,
Samuel H. Smith.”
Necessity of the Testimonies
In all ages of the world when the Lord has had a work to
be performed he has raised up witnesses. In this manner his works are
attested so that those who reject them will be left without an excuse. The
justice of the Lord demands that this shall be done. The Lord commanded
Moses, when in the wilderness, that no man should be condemned except it
be on the testimony of two or three witnesses. “One witness shall not rise
up against a man for any iniquity, or for any sin, in any sin that he
sinneth: at the mouth of two witnesses, or at the mouth of three
witnesses, shall the matter be established” (Deut. 19:15). The Savior
himself bore witness to the justice and validity of this law when he
contended with the Jews. Said He: “It is also written in your law, that
the testimony of two men is true. I am one that beareth witness of myself,
and the Father that sent me beareth witness of me.” In this manner he
condemned them for rejecting his testimony, which was attested by the
scriptures and had the approval of his Father.
If Joseph Smith had given no other testimony but his
own, then he might justly have been condemned, for his testimony would not
have been in keeping with the word of the Lord, but the testimony of three
other men should be sufficient. Reinforced as that testimony is by the
testimony of the eleven others, and by the witness which the book itself
affords, the testimony given by Joseph Smith becomes binding on the world.
All who reject it, the Lord said, shall be condemned, for the “testimony
of two men is true,” provide they are truthful witnesses. The Book of
Mormon declares that in “the mouth of three witnesses shall these things
be established; and the testimony of three, and this work, in the which
shall be shown forth the power of God and also his word, of which the
Father and the Son, and the Holy Ghost bear record—and all this
shall stand as a testimony against the world at the last day” (Ether 5:4).
Validity of the Testimonies
The witnesses of the Book of Mormon were true and
faithful to their testimony throughout their lives. The time came,
however, when all three of the special witnesses became estranged from
Joseph Smith and departed from the Church. Because of their spirit of
rebellion against the Prophet and the work, Oliver Cowdery and David
Whitmer were dealt with for their fellowship and excommunicated from the
Church. Martin Harris simply drifted away without action being taken
against him in an official way. While the Prophet lived, they retained
their bitterness of spirit and remained aloof, but during all those years,
and to the end of life, all three were steadfast in their testimony as
found in the Book of Mormon. In the year 1848, after the Church had been
driven from Nauvoo, Oliver Cowdery returned to the Church, at Kanesville
and humbly begged to be re-admitted as a member. Martin Harris also sought
again a place and standing in the Church and in the year 1870 he came to
Utah to make his home. He died in 1875, at Clarkston, Utah, at the age of
92 years. David Whitmer never came back to the Church, but shortly before
his death, in refutation of the statements that had gone forth that he had
denied his testimony, he published it again to the world, in which he
said: “It is recorded in the American Cyclopedia and the Encyclopedia
Britannica, that I, David Whitmer, have denied my testimony as one of the
Three Witnesses to the divinity of the Book of Mormon; and that the other
two witnesses, Oliver Cowdery and Martin Harris, denied their testimony to
that book. I will say once more to all mankind, that I have never at any
time denied that testimony or any part thereof. I also testify to the
world, that neither Oliver Cowdery nor Martin Harris ever at any time
denied their testimony. They both died reaffirming the truth of the divine
authenticity of the Book of Mormon.”3
Impossibility of Collusion
If there had been collusion between Joseph Smith and the
witnesses, then of necessity they would have had to hold together and tell
the same story. A disagreement on the part of any, or all of them, would
have meant destruction to their plan, if it were not true. The boldness
with which Joseph Smith and the Church met the situation, when these men
rebelled, and took action against them and severed them from the Church,
would never have been done if there had been fraud and collusion. The
Prophet and the high council would not have dared to do it. This fact
together with the other fact that after they were severed from the Church
and had become estranged, they all three bore the same testimony, and all
told the same story which they told when in the Church, precludes even the
remotest possibility that they had planned together to deceive. These
truths together with much more evidence which cannot be mentioned here, is
strong presumptive evidence of the authenticity of the solemn message
given by these witnesses to the world.
The Angel Receives the Plates
After the completion of the translation of the Book of
Mormon in 1829, the angel again appeared to Joseph Smith and received back
the plates into his keeping. Of this circumstance the Prophet wrote in
1838: “By the wisdom of God, they [the plates] remained safe in my hands,
until I had accomplished by them what was required at my hand. When,
according to arrangement, the messenger called for them, I delivered them
up to him, and he has them in his charge until this day.”
The Book of Mormon Printed
The question of printing the manuscript now confronted
Joseph Smith. Not only was he without the necessary means, but printers
were scarce and those who were approached were either prejudiced through
bigotry, or unwilling for fear of the opposition of customers. Martin
Harris, who possessed the means, came to the rescue with a promise to pay
for the printing of the book. Finally a contract was entered into with Mr.
Egbert B. Grandin, of Palmyra, who consented to print five thousand copies
of the Book of Mormon for three thousand dollars. In the meantime the
copyright to the book had been secured. The appearance of the words
“Author and Proprietor” which appear on the title page of the first
edition of the Book of Mormon, have caused some ridicule by enemies of
Joseph Smith. This expression was printed in the book in accord with the
law governing copyrights, and in no way detracts from the validity of the
story of the translation of the record.
Soon after the completion of the translation and the
securing of the copyright, the Lord commanded that Oliver Cowdery should
transcribe the entire manuscript, and that in furnishing copy to the
printer, the second copy should be used, and that only sheet by sheet, as
the type should be set up. It was further provided that in going to and
from the printing office, there should always be a guard to protect the
manuscript, and that a guard should be placed at the home constantly to
watch and protect the translation from evil disposed persons. These
precautions were necessary because of the malicious opposition which
prevailed in and about Palmyra, where the work was done. At times attempts
were made to get the manuscript from the possession of Joseph and those
who, with him, had the work in charge.
One man, named Cole, more cunning than the others who
opposed the work, devised the plan of anticipating the publication of the
book. Cole, an ex-justice of the peace, was printing a paper which he
called Dogberry Paper on Winter Hill. He had
announced to his subscribers that he would furnish them weekly
installments of the Book of Mormon in his paper. Having access to the
Grandin printing office, he commenced his publication by working on
Sundays when the office was closed. In this manner he was able to publish
a number of issues containing garbled extracts from the printed sheets of
the Book of Mormon. As the copyright was secured, he was warned and
finally stopped from this method of stealing. The work of printing the
book continued, but not without interruption, for great pressure was
brought to bear upon the printer who was threatened by enemies of the
latter-day work, with a withdrawal of trade that would ruin his business.
This came near to breaking the contract. However, after some delays, the
book was finished some time in the spring of 1830, and made ready to go
forth, as the Nephite prophets had foretold, to the Gentiles and then to
the house of Israel as a voice speaking out of the dust.
Notes
2 Nephi 27:12–13. Ether 5:2–4. Compare John 8:16–18.
History of the Prophet Joseph, p. 139. Lucy
Smith
An Address to All Believers in Christ, David
Whitmer. Compare Millennial Star, 43:301.
Chapter 11
Revelation to the Witnesses
Before the Church could be organized it was essential
that there be revealed such matters as pertained to the organization of
the Church. This was done between the time the witnesses viewed the plates
of the ancient record and the sixth of April, 1830. The first of these
(Doc. and Cov. Sec. 18) was given to Joseph Smith, Oliver Cowdery and
David Whitmer, at Fayette. It made known the calling of the Twelve
Apostles who should be chosen in this dispensation, although it was about
six years before they were called. It gave instructions “relative to the
building up of the Church of Christ according to the fulness of the
Gospel.” It was also stated that the Book of Mormon contained “all things
written concerning the foundation” of the Church and the Gospel. The
Church, when organized, should be built upon the foundation of the Gospel
and “the gates of hell shall not prevail” against it. Moreover, it was
declared that “the world is ripening in iniquity, and it must needs be
that the children of men are stirred up unto repentance, both the Gentiles
and also the house of Israel.” To Oliver Cowdery and David Whitmer, the
Lord said that all men were now called on to repent, for the Priesthood
was restored and the opportunity given for the remission of sins. These
men had been called as special witnesses, and therefore were under
obligation to warn the world. Until this time men had not been privileged
to be baptized, for there had been no authority in the earth to officiate
in gospel ordinances. The Lord said the worth of souls was great, for
Christ had suffered “the pains of all men that all might repent and come
unto him.” As many as would repent and be baptized in the name of Jesus
Christ and endure to the end, should be saved. It was made clear in this
revelation that all men must take upon them the name of Jesus Christ, for
in his name should “they be called in the last day.” Otherwise they
“cannot have a place in the kingdom” of the Father.
The Twelve Apostles
Not only were Joseph Smith and the witnesses to the Book
of Mormon to be called to testify, but there were to be twelve other
witnesses, who should be appointed to declare the Gospel to both Gentile
and Jew. The three witnesses to the Book of Mormon were designated to
search out these Twelve Apostles, who were to have charge of the preaching
of the Gospel in all the world.
Revelation Given to Martin Harris
The next great commandment (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 19) was
given to Martin Harris, in March, 1830, as one of the three special
witnesses. Martin was admonished and warned against his weaknesses, and
was commanded to preach the first principles of the Gospel and declare
“glad tidings” upon the mountains, and “every high place, and among the
people,” unto the end of his life. If he should fail, then misery should
he receive. He was further instructed to keep his contract with the
printer, and impart of his substance for the printing of the Book of
Mormon, which “contains the truth and the word of God.”
The Atonement and Eternal Punishment Explained
The most important teaching in this revelation was the
doctrine of the atonement and the explanation of the expression “eternal
punishment.” “I am Alpha and Omega,” said the Lord, “yea, even I am He,
the beginning and the end, the Redeemer of the world. I have accomplished
and finished the will of him whose I am, even the Father, concerning me
—having done this that I might subdue all things unto myself,
retaining all power, even to the destroying of Satan and his works at the
end of the world, and the last great day of judgment, which I shall pass
upon the inhabitants thereof, judging every man according to his works and
the deeds which he hath done.
“And surely every man must repent or suffer, for I, God,
am endless; wherefore, I revoke not the judgments which I shall pass, but
woes shall go forth, weeping, wailing and gnashing of teeth, yea, to those
who are found on my left hand. Nevertheless it is not written that there
shall be no end to this torment, but it is written endless torment. Again
it is written eternal damnation; wherefore it is more express than other
scriptures, that it might work upon the hearts of the children of men,
altogether for my name’s glory. Wherefore I will explain unto you this
mystery, for it is mete unto you to know even as mine apostles. .
. .
“For behold, the mystery of Godliness, how great is it?
for, behold, I am endless, and the punishment which is given from my hand,
is endless punishment, for Endless is my name; wherefore—
Eternal punishment is God’s punishment.
Endless punishment is God’s punishment.”
Then follows the statement that Jesus Christ “suffered
the pains for all, that they might not suffer if they would repent.” These
sufferings were most exquisite and sore, which caused him “the greatest of
all, to tremble because of pain, and to bleed at every pore, and to suffer
both body and spirit;” and would that he “might not drink the bitter cup
and shrink.” Nevertheless he partook of that cup and finished his work,
and this that men might not suffer if they would repent; but if they will
not repent then they must suffer even as he.
Revelation on Church Government
In April 1830, just before the organization of the
Church, another very important revelation (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 20) was
received on Church government. In it the date for the organization of the
Church was designated as April 6. The Church was to be “regularly
organized and established agreeable to the laws of our country” by the
will and commandment of the Lord. These commandments were given to Joseph
Smith and Oliver Cowdery, who had been called and ordained to be apostles,
or special witnesses for Christ. Joseph Smith was to be the first elder of
the Church and Oliver Cowdery the second elder, and they were to ordain
each other to these callings, according to the grace of Jesus Christ.
Other matters of great importance revealed are as follows:
Mention is made of the matter of translation of the Book
of Mormon, which is said to contain the record of a fallen people, and the
fulness of the Gospel to the Gentiles and also to the Jews. By the opening
of the heavens, and the inspiration given to men who are called to his
holy work, the Lord has shown that “he is the same God yesterday, today,
and forever, and does inspire men and call them to his work in this age
and generation, as well as in generations of old.
By these great witnesses the world shall be judged,
“even as many as shall come to a knowledge of this work.” Those who
receive it in righteousness shall receive a crown of eternal life, while
those who reject it shall be condemned. It is declared that the Lord has
spoken, and the elders of the Church have heard and bear witness so that
through their testimony man may know there is a God in heaven, who is
infinite and eternal, from everlasting to everlasting, the same
unchangeable Framer of heaven and earth and all things which are in them.
Man is created in the image of God, male and female, and is commanded to
love and serve him. Through transgression of his laws, man became fallen,
wherefore the Only Begotten Son was sent into the world to suffer
temptations—but gave no heed to them—was crucified, died, and
rose the third day and ascended into heaven to reign in power. All who
believe on him and are baptized and endure to the end, shall be saved, no
matter when they lived on the earth. Men everywhere must repent and
believe in Christ, worshiping the Father in the name of the Son and endure
in faith, or they cannot be saved. Justification through grace is true, as
also is sanctification, to all who love the Father with all their might,
mind and strength. The dangers of falling away from grace are pointed out,
with a warning to the members of the Church to “take heed and pray always
lest they fall into temptation.”
Manner of Baptism Explained
By way of commandment to the Church the manner of
Baptism is set forth as follows: “All those who humble themselves before
God, and desire to be baptized and come forth with broken hearts and
contrite spirits, and witness before the Church that they have truly
repented of all their sins, and are willing to take upon them the name of
Jesus Christ, having a determination to serve him to the end, and truly
manifest by their works that they have received of the Spirit of Christ
unto the remission of their sins, shall be received into his Church.” No
person can be received into the Church unless he has arrived unto the
years of accountability, which is eight years, for he must be capable of
repentance, which infants are not. Baptism is to be administered in the
following manner unto all who repent:
How Baptism is Performed
“The person who is called of God, and has authority from
Jesus Christ to baptize, shall go down into the water with the person who
has presented him or herself for baptism, and shall say, calling him or
her by name: Having been commissioned of Jesus Christ, I baptize you in
the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Amen. Then
shall he immerse him or her in the water, and come forth again out of the
water.”
Duties of Elders, Priests, Teachers, Deacons and
Members
An apostle is said to be an elder. His calling is to
baptize and ordain other officers in the Church. It should here be
explained that at the organization of the Church and for some time
thereafter, the officers mentioned here were all that were needed. As the
Church expanded the Lord revealed the duties of other officers in their
time. Elders are to baptize, confirm members, preach, expound the
scriptures, administer the sacrament and take charge of meetings which are
to be conducted “as they,” the elders “are led by the Holy Ghost,
according to the commandments and revelations.”
The priest is to teach, expound, baptize and administer
the sacrament. He may ordain other priests, teachers and deacons, but
cannot lay on hands for the gift of the Holy Ghost. He may take the lead
of meetings in the absence of higher authority. It is his duty to visit
the home of the members and exhort them to pray vocally and in secret and
to attend to all family duties. When called upon he is to assist the elder
in his duties.
The teacher is to be the guardian of the Church. He is
to see that there is no iniquity in the Church, neither lying, backbiting,
or evil speaking among the members, and to see that the Church meet
together often and that the members perform their duties. He is to take
the lead of meetings if there is no elder or priest present and may assist
them in their duties. He cannot baptize, confirm, or administer the
sacrament.
The deacon is to assist the teacher and other officers
in the Church, but he cannot baptize, confirm, or administer the sacrament.
Conferences of the Church
The elders of the Church are instructed to meet in
conference once in three months, or from time to time as they may
determine, to transact such business as may come before them. All who are
ordained are to receive certificates of ordination, and shall be accepted
as officers in the Church by the vote of the members.
Duties of Church Members
All members shall be received by baptism after they have
repented of their sins. They shall have sufficient time to be taught the
Gospel and Church government before they are confirmed and partake of the
sacrament. Children are to be brought to the elders of the Church, who
shall bless them. The members must meet together often to partake of the
sacrament in remembrance of the Lord Jesus Christ. The elder or priest who
shall administer the sacrament “shall kneel with the Church and call upon
the Father in solemn prayer,” repeating the words which the Lord Himself
has given.
Transgressors
Any member of the Church transgressing the commandments
of the Lord, or the rules of the Church, shall be dealt with as the
scriptures direct. If any are expelled their names are to be “blotted out”
and not kept on the records of the Church.
Recommendations of Members
Records of members are to be kept in a book, and the
members moving from one branch to another shall take a letter of
recommendation, or certificate, stating that they are in standing in the
Church. This shall be presented to the presiding officer in the branch
with which they desire to unite.
Summary
These commandments and instructions were given through
Joseph Smith, shortly before the organization of the Church, to guide him
and his companions in Church government. They are all important because
they deal with the fundamental principles of the Gospel and doctrines of
the Church. They set forth clearly many things which were familiarly known
in the primitive Church, but which were either lost or perverted during
the ages of apostasy and departure from the standards set by the Savior
and his disciples. Again they are restored in their simplicity, freed from
all mysticism and error, for the salvation of mankind.
Chapter 12
The Church Organized
It was made known, shortly after the bestowal of the
Melchizedek Priesthood, that the Church of Jesus Christ was to be
organized. It was after Joseph Smith and his companions had engaged in
solemn prayer that the word of the Lord came to them in the home of Father
Peter Whitmer, “commanding us,” the Prophet writes, “that I should ordain
Oliver Cowdery to be an elder in the Church of Jesus Christ; and that he
also should ordain me to the same office; and then to ordain others, as it
should be made known unto us from time to time. We were, however,
commanded to defer this our ordination until such times as it should be
practicable to have our brethren, who had been and who should be baptized,
assembled together, when we must have their sanction to our thus
proceeding to ordain each other, and have them decide by vote whether they
were willing to accept us as spiritual teachers or not; when also we were
commanded to bless bread and break it with them, and to take wine, bless
it, and drink it with them; afterward proceed to ordain each other
according to commandment; then call out such men as the Spirit should
indicate, and ordain them; and then attend to the laying on of hands for
the gift of the Holy Ghost, upon all those whom we had previously
baptized, doing all things in the name of the Lord.”
Fulfilment of the Promise
On the sixth day of April, 1830, the time for the
fulfilment of this promise arrived, Joseph and a few of those who had been
baptized met in the house of Peter Whitmer, Sen., and proceeded, as the
Lord had instructed them, to organize the Church. It was on a Tuesday, and
there were six in number, namely, Joseph Smith, Oliver Cowdery, Hyrum
Smith, Peter Whitmer, Jr., David Whitmer and Samuel H. Smith. The small,
but momentous meeting, was opened by solemn prayer. Those present then
proceeded to express their willingness, as instructed by divine
commandment, to accept Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery as their teachers
in the things of the kingdom of God. Then they were called upon to declare
whether or not they were willing to proceed to organize the Church of
Jesus Christ. To both propositions they consented with unanimous voice. “I
then laid my hands upon Oliver Cowdery,” says the Prophet, “and ordained
him an elder of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints; after
which he ordained me also to the office of elder of said Church. We then
took bread, blessed it, and brake it with them; and also wine, blessed,
and drank it with them. We then laid our hands on each individual member
of the Church present, that they might receive the gift of the Holy Ghost,
and be confirmed members of the Church of Christ. The Holy Ghost was
poured out upon us to a very marked degree, some prophesied, whilst we all
praised the Lord, and rejoiced exceedingly.”
All six of these young men—Hyrum Smith, the
oldest, was but 31 years of age—had been baptized previously to the
organization. They were all again baptized on that memorable day, April 6,
1830.
A Record to be Kept
While they were still in session in this meeting of
organization a revelation (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 21) was given to the Church
in which they were instructed to keep a record. In this record, Joseph
Smith was to be called “a seer, a translator, a prophet, an apostle of
Jesus Christ, and elder of the Church through the will of God the Father,
and the grace of your Lord Jesus Christ.” The Church was also commanded to
give heed unto all his words and commandments, “as he receiveth them, as
if from mine own mouth, in all patience and faith,” said the Lord. By
doing this “the gates of hell” should not prevail against them, for the
Lord would dispel the powers of darkness. The Prophet would no longer have
to mourn for Zion, for he should have inspiration to move the cause of
Zion in mighty power, for the days of her rejoicing were at hand. Oliver
Cowdery was appointed “the first preacher of the Church, unto the Church,
and before the world, yea, before the Gentiles and . . . to the
Jews also.”
Destiny of the Church
In the manner here described, there came into the world
a power, destined to grow and expand until it shall fill the earth, for it
is the “kingdom which shall never be destroyed . . . and it
shall stand forever.” At the time of the organization, however, its
influence and power appeared to be insignificant; yet it caused, even
then, consternation and fear in the hearts of the wicked, and strenuous
efforts were launched to bring it to destruction.
Others Called to the Ministry
Before the meeting closed Joseph and Oliver called out
others and ordained them to different offices in the Priesthood, as the
Spirit manifested unto them, presumably to the offices in the Aaronic
Priesthood. The Spirit of the Lord was poured out upon them in abundance,
and after a happy time spent in testimony and witnessing to each other the
blessings of the Lord, they dismissed the meeting, feeling that they were
now individually members of the Church of Jesus Christ, and acknowledged
as such of God. There were others present besides the six who formed the
organization of the Church. Six persons were required by law to properly
form a society or organization of the kind. Others who were present also
received of the Spirit of the Lord in the meeting and being convinced of
the truth came forward and desired to be united with the Church. Shortly
afterwards they were also baptized. Among these were the Prophet’s
parents, Joseph Smith, Sen., and Lucy Mack Smith; also Martin Harris and
Orrin Porter Rockwell.
Baptism a New and Everlasting Covenant
As stated, all six of the original members of the Church
were again baptized on the day of the organization. This action was due,
in part at least, to the fact that baptism is the doorway into the Church
as well as for the remission of sins. There had been a few others baptized
before the sixth of April (see Ch. 9). Some of those previously baptized
raised the question as to why they should again be baptized. In
consequence of their desire to unite with the Church without re-baptism,
the Prophet inquired of the Lord in relation to the matter and received
the following revelation:
“Behold, I say unto you, that all old covenants have I
caused to be done away in this thing, and this is a new and an
everlasting covenant, even that which was from the beginning.Wherefore, although a man should be baptized an
hundred times, it availeth him nothing, for you cannot enter in at the
strait gate by the law of Moses, neither by your dead works;For it is because of your dead works, that I have
caused this last covenant and this Church to be built up unto me, even
as in days of old.Wherefore, enter ye in at the gate, as I have
commanded, and seek not to counsel your God. Amen” (Doc. and Cov. sec.
22).
Chapter 13
The First Public Discourse
On Sunday, April 11, 1830, the work of proselyting was
publicly launched. The first discourse was preached by Oliver Cowdery. The
meeting was held by appointment at the home of “Father” Peter Whitmer,
where the meeting of organization had been held the Tuesday preceding. A
goodly number of members and investigators were present. The impression
made on the minds of those assembled was favorable, and the same day Hiram
Page, Katherine Page, Christian Whitmer, Anne Whitmer, Jacob Whitmer and
Elizabeth Whitmer, were baptized. One week later (April 18) Peter Whitmer,
Sen., Mary Whitmer, William Jolly, Elizabeth Jolly, Vincent Jolly, Richard
B. Preston and Elizabeth Ann Whitmer, were added to the Church.
The Ministry of Joseph Smith in Colesville
Later in the month of April Joseph Smith paid a visit to
the Knight family in Colesville, Broome County, N. Y. He had been on
very friendly terms with Joseph Knight, Sen., and had been materially
assisted by that gentleman from time to time, while translating the
plates. Mr. Knight and his family were Universalists, with broad, liberal
views. They were willing to reason in a friendly spirit with Joseph Smith
on the scriptures. Several public meetings were held in Colesville which
were attended by many friends and strangers. Newel Knight, son of Joseph
Knight, Sen., was a regular attendant at these meetings, and seemed to be
deeply impressed. He and the Prophet held many conversations on scriptural
subjects and the plan of salvation, in which a favorable impression was
made on the mind of Newel. He promised to assist Joseph in one of these
meetings by offering vocal prayer, but when the time came his courage
failed him. Later he expressed a desire to go out in the woods by himself
and there, where he could be alone, offer vocal prayer, a thing to which
he evidently was not accustomed. The following morning, in fulfilment of
his promise, he retired into the woods alone, with a troubled conscience
because of his failure to keep his promise on the previous occasion.
Kneeling in a secluded spot he attempted to offer vocal prayer, but his
lips were sealed. He could not pray. He began to feel uneasy and became
troubled in both mind and body. When he arrived home his wife was greatly
alarmed at his strange appearance. He requested her to send for Joseph,
which was done. When he came he found Newel suffering very much; his
visage was distorted, and his limbs were twisted out of shape in a
frightful manner. Presently he was caught up from the floor and tossed
about the room. The strange scene and excitement brought many of the
neighbors to the house, who witnessed his peculiar malady.
The First Miracle
After some difficulty Joseph succeeded in taking Newel
by the hand, and with great earnestness Newel pleaded with him to cast the
devil out of him, for he knew he was possessed. The Prophet said, “If you
know that I can, it shall be done.” Then, almost unconsciously, he rebuked
the evil spirit in the name of Jesus Christ and commanded him to depart.
Immediately Newel spoke, saying he saw the evil spirit leave him and
vanish from his sight. This was the first miracle performed in this
dispensation. As soon as the devil departed Newel became normal again, his
distortions of body ceased, and the Spirit of the Lord opened his vision
to a glorious manifestation of the heavens.
Those who were present were greatly astonished when they
saw the casting out of the devil, and the witness of the Spirit of the
Lord. Nearly all of those who were present later became members of the
Church.
The First Conference of the Church
Shortly after this event, Joseph returned to Fayette.
Newel Knight followed him and was baptized during the last week in May, by
David Whitmer. On the 9th of June the first conference of the Church was
held in Fayette. The Church at that time numbered twenty-seven souls.
There were many others present at the meetings, some of whom were friendly
and some who believed. At this conference the sacrament was administered
and those recently baptized were confirmed. Others were sustained by the
members to receive the Priesthood, and were ordained. The officers at the
commencement of the Conference were, Joseph Smith, Oliver Cowdery, David
Whitmer, Peter Whitmer and Ziba Peterson, each of whom held the office of
elder in the Church. During this conference Samuel H. Smith was ordained
to the office of an elder, Joseph Smith, Sen., Hyrum Smith and Martin
Harris were ordained priests, and Hiram Page and Christian Whitmer were
ordained teachers. At the close of this conference there were in the
Church seven ordained elders, three priests and two teachers. Oliver
Cowdery was appointed to keep the record of the Church and minutes of
meetings until the next conference. The Holy Spirit was poured out upon
them. Many of this little band composing the Church were given the spirit
of prophecy, while others beheld visions and remarkable manifestations
from the heavens. Newel Knight saw in vision the great work which would
yet be accomplished through the preaching of the Gospel and the
organization of the Church. He beheld the Redeemer and received the
assurance that he would be admitted into his presence to dwell in his
kingdom for ever.
“To find ourselves engaged in the very same order of
things,” said Joseph Smith, “as observed by the holy apostles of old; to
realize the importance and solemnity of such proceedings; and to witness
and feel with our own natural senses, the like glorious manifestations of
the powers of the Priesthood, the gift and blessing of the Holy Ghost, and
the goodness and condescension of a merciful God unto such as obey the
everlasting Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ, combined to create within us
sensations of rapturous gratitude, and inspire us with fresh zeal and
energy in the cause of truth.”
Eleven other converts were baptized at the close of this
conference, by David Whitmer, in Seneca Lake, where most of the other
baptisms were performed. Those added to the Church at this time were: John
Poorman, John Jolly, Julia Ann Jolly, Harriet Jolly, Jerusha Smith (the
wife of Hyrum Smith), William, Catherine and Don Carlos Smith; and Peter,
Caroline and Electa Rockwell.
Second Visit to Colesville
Joseph Smith again paid a visit to Colesville a short
time after this conference. Oliver Cowdery, John and David Whitmer
accompanied him. They found a number of persons anxiously awaiting them
and desiring baptism. A meeting was appointed for the Sabbath; on Saturday
a dam was constructed across a stream in preparation for the ordinance on
the following day. During the night the dam was maliciously destroyed. It
was later learned that this was the work of a mob, at the instigation of
sectarian priests. On Sunday the meeting was held as contemplated. Oliver
Cowdery was the principal speaker, but others also spoke. The first
principles of the Gospel were presented and witness to the divine message
of the Book of Mormon was borne. In the meeting were many who had helped
to form the mob, who, at the close, endeavored to destroy the influence of
the meeting, but were unsuccessful. Extreme bitterness was manifested on
the part of those who opposed. The sister of Newel Knight’s wife was
violently treated because she was kindly disposed, and against her will
was forced by a Rev. Shearer, to return to her father’s home, some
distance from her sister’s, where she was stopping. This man, a
Presbyterian minister, on false pretenses, obtained from the father a
power of attorney, by which he dragged her off. His labor was all in vain,
for she also was baptized.
Early Monday morning the dam was replaced and thirteen
persons were baptized by Oliver Cowdery. They were: Emma, wife of Joseph
Smith; Hezekiah Peck and wife, Joseph Knight, Sen., and wife, William
Stringham and wife, Joseph Knight, Jr., Aaron Culver and wife, Levi Hale,
Polly Knight and Julia Stringham.
Arrest of Joseph Smith
Before they were through with the ordinance the mob
began to gather. They surrounded the house of Joseph Knight, Sen.,
prepared to do violence, but through the blessings of the Lord the Saints
were protected, but were subjected to numerous insults and threatenings. A
meeting was called for that evening for the purpose of attending to the
confirmation of those baptized in the morning. When they met at the
appointed hour, they were all surprised at the appearance of a constable,
who, with a warrant, arrested Joseph on the charge of being “a disorderly
person, setting the country in an uproar by preaching the Book of Mormon.”
The constable frankly informed him that the arrest was for the purpose of
getting him into the hands of a mob, then lying in ambush for him, but he
would save him from their hands as he, the constable, had discovered that
Joseph was not the sort of person he had been led to believe. As Joseph
accompanied the constable in a wagon, they encountered the mob, not far
from the home of Joseph Knight. The mobbers waited for the prearranged
signal from the constable, but he, whipping up his horse, obtained a lead.
The mobbers followed as best they could. In the flight one of the wagon
wheels came off, and before it could be replaced the mobbers were again in
sight. However, the wheel was replaced in time and with renewed energy
Joseph was able to escape.
The constable took Joseph to South Bainbridge, Chenango
County, and lodged him in a tavern, where he kept guard all night. The
following day a court convened to investigate the charges. Great
excitement prevailed because of falsehoods which had been circulated
freely among the people. Joseph Knight, Sen., engaged the services of two
respectable farmers who were versed in the law, namely, James Davidson and
John Reid, and brought them to South Bainbridge to defend the Prophet.
The Trial at South Bainbridge
The enemies of Joseph Smith scoured the country for
witnesses who would testify against him. The justice of the peace who
heard the case, Joseph Chamberlain, was a man of fair mind and a lover of
justice. Many witnesses were heard, but among those who testified were
Josiah Stowel, Jonathan Thompson and the two daughters of Mr. Stowel, all
of whom gave evidence of his good character. Other testimony was proved to
be false. The trial lasted from ten o’clock in the morning until midnight,
when a verdict of “not guilty” was rendered.
The Second Arrest
No sooner was Joseph freed by the court than he was
again arrested on a second warrant from Broome County, a distance of about
fifteen miles. The constable who came for him forced him to leave that
night without permitting him to eat, although he had been in the court
room all day without nourishment. He took him to Colesville and lodged him
in a tavern. Then, calling in a number of rowdies, he began to abuse his
prisoner with the assistance of his rabble. Spitting upon him and pointing
their fingers at him they cried in fiendish glee, “Prophesy, prophesy!”
Being near his home, Joseph requested the constable to take him there for
the remainder of the night, but this was denied him. He asked for
something to eat and was given some crusts of bread and water.
The Trial at Colesville
The next day the trial began before three justices. The
most able help had been secured to prosecute the case while the defense
was again represented by Esquires Reid and Davidson. Many witnesses were
called who bore false and contradictory testimony. Newel Knight was placed
upon the stand and questioned in ridicule by one of the lawyers, named
Seymour, in relation to the casting out of a devil from his person, but
the testimony turned to the discomfiture of the prosecution.
At the close of the testimony the court deliberated for
about thirty minutes, although it was then nearly two o’clock a.m. and
they had been in session since the morning of the previous day. The
prisoner was brought before the court and the presiding justice said: “Mr.
Smith, we have had your case under consideration, examined the testimony
and find nothing to condemn you, and therefore you are discharged.” The
judges then proceeded to reprimand him severely, “Not because anything
derogatory to his character in any shape had been proved against him by
the host of witnesses that had testified during the trial,” said Mr. Reid,
“but merely to please those fiends in human shape who were engaged in the
unhallowed persecution of an innocent man, sheerly on account of his
religious opinions.”
Statement of Mr. Reid
Several years later, Mr. Reid visited Nauvoo, and in the
course of an address said, speaking of these trials:
“But, alas! the devil, not satisfied with his defeat
(at the first trial) stirred up a man not unlike himself, who was more
fit to dwell among the fiends of hell than to belong to the human
family, to go to Colesville and get another writ, and take him to Broome
County for another trial. They were sure they could send that boy to
hell, or to Texas, they did not care which; and in half an hour after he
was discharged by the court, he was arrested again, and on the way to
Colesville for another trial. I was again called upon by his friends to
defend him against his malignant persecutors, and clear him from the
false charges they had preferred against him. I made every reasonable
excuse I could, as I was nearly worn down through fatigue and want of
sleep, as I had been engaged in law suits for two days, and nearly the
whole of two nights. But I saw the persecution was great against him;
and here, let me say, Mr, Chairman, singular as it may seem, while Mr.
Knight was pleading with me to go, a peculiar impression, or thought
struck my mind, that I must go and defend him, for he was the Lord’s
anointed. I did not know what it meant, but thought I must go and clear
the Lord’s anointed. I said I would go, and started with as much faith
as the apostles had when they could remove mountains, accompanied by
Father Knight, who was like the old patriarchs that followed the ark of
God to the city of David. . . . We got him away that
night from the midst of three hundred people without his receiving any
injury; but I am well aware that we were assisted by some higher power
than man; for to look back on the scene, I cannot tell how we succeeded
in getting him away. I take no glory to myself; it was the Lord’s work
and marvelous in our eyes” (Times and Seasons
5:549–552).
Inspiration of the Attorneys
At the trial the Prophet’s lawyers, who were not members
of the Church, spoke with an inspiration that caused their enemies to
quake before them. So powerful were their words that many of the assembled
multitude were pricked in their hearts. The constable who had been so
vicious came forward and apologized for his ill-treatment and misbehavior,
and revealed the plans of the mob who were then prepared to tar and
feather the Prophet and ride him on a rail. By the aid of the constable,
Joseph was able to escape and make his way in safety to his sister’s home,
where he found his wife awaiting him.
The Mob Threatens Joseph and Oliver
A few days later Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery
returned to Colesville to confirm those whom they had been forced to
leave, at the time of Joseph’s arrest. Their presence was the signal for
the mobbers to again assemble. So sinister were their movements that
Joseph and Oliver departed from the town without waiting for refreshments.
Their enemies pursued them but through extreme diligence they were able to
make their escape. All night they traveled, except for a short period when
they sought some rest in sleep, each taking turn in watching. The next day
they arrived home, footsore and weary.
The spirit of opposition which took such decided form,
was the result of agitation on the part of professors of religion. The
Rev. Shearer, Cyrus McMaster, Dr. Boyington and a Mr. Benton, pillars in
the Presbyterian Church, incited the mobbers to do their work. Benton was
the man who signed the first warrant for Joseph Smith’s arrest as a
“disorderly person” for preaching the Book of Mormon. In this manner Satan
stirred up the hearts of the people to try and overthrow the work.
Missionary Journey of Samuel H. Smith
In the month of June, 1830, Samuel Harrison Smith was
set apart by the Prophet to take a missionary journey to the east. This
may be termed the first missionary journey in the Church. Taking with him
several copies of the Book of Mormon, he started on his way. The first day
he traveled twenty-five miles, and on the way attempted to sell copies of
the book, but without success. When night came on he went to an inn, faint
and hungry; approaching the proprietor he asked him if he did not want to
buy a book which contained the history of the Indians.
“I do not know,” the man replied, “how did you get hold
of it?”
“It was translated by my brother, from some plates of
gold, that he found buried in the earth,” was Samuel’s reply.
“You liar!” said the landlord, “get out of my house, you
shan’t stay one minute with your books.”
Samuel was discouraged, but continued on his journey.
That night he slept under an apple tree. In the morning he called at the
home of Rev. John P. Greene, a Methodist minister. Mr. Greene was just
leaving on a preaching tour, and like the others who had been approached,
he was not interested in the book. However, he manifested a friendly
spirit, and at the earnest solicitation of Samuel, consented to take a
subscription paper and try to sell copies of the book. Thereupon Samuel
left him a copy of the Book of Mormon with the understanding that he would
call again in about two weeks. At the appointed time Samuel returned and
was disappointed to learn that there had been no sale. On his way to the
home of Mr. Greene, Samuel again passed the tavern. On the door was a
small-pox sign. Making inquiry he learned that the tavern keeper had died
from the effects of the disease. He returned home after his labors were
finished, feeling that his work had proved to be fruitless. More out of
curiosity than desire, both Mr. Greene and his wife read the book and were
deeply impressed. The copy Samuel left with John P. Greene was placed by
the latter in the hands of members of the Young family, which was the
first direct information to Brigham Young and his brothers and some of
their friends, including Heber C. Kimball, of the restoration of the
Gospel.
Joseph Smith, Sen., Visits Potsdam
About this time Joseph Smith, Sen., and his youngest
son, Don Carlos, departed on a similar journey to Potsdam, N. Y.
Potsdam was the home of Asael Smith, father of Joseph Smith, Sen., and
several of his children. Joseph was more successful on this trip than his
son Samuel apparently had been, for his father Asael accepted the truth of
the everlasting Gospel, as also did most of his children. Jesse, the
oldest son of Asael, rejected the message of his brother Joseph and
manifested a very bitter spirit against the Gospel all his life.
Book of Moses Revealed
During the summer of 1830, the Lord revealed to the
Church a number of important revelations. In June, the Prophet received
the words of the Lord to Moses, at a time when Moses was caught up into a
high mountain where he talked with the Lord face to face. This revelation
was augmented later by more of the writings of Moses, which are found in
the Pearl of Great Price. Some of the important knowledge imparted in this
revelation is as follows: The works of the Lord are without end. No man
can behold all the works of the Father without partaking of his glory, and
that cannot be given in mortal life. Moses was created in the similitude,
or likeness, of the Only Begotten Son. The generations of men passed
before his view and he saw from the beginning to the end—all through
the spiritual eye, for the natural eye cannot behold the glory of the
Lord. After this vision had passed, Moses was left unto himself and it was
several hours before he gained his natural strength. Then Satan came,
tempting him and commanding him to worship him, but Moses said: “Who art
thou? For behold, I am a son of God, in the similitude of his Only
Begotten Son; and where is thy glory, that I should worship thee? For
behold, I could not look upon God, except his glory should come upon me,
and I were strengthened before him. But I can look upon thee in the
natural man.” Moreover, Moses said: “I will not cease to call upon God, I
have other things to inquire of him; for his glory has been upon me,
wherefore I can judge between him and thee. Depart hence, Satan.” When
Moses had said this Satan cried with a loud voice saying he was the Only
Begotten. Then Moses feared exceedingly but did not cease to call upon the
Lord and there was opened to his vision the bitterness of hell, and in the
strength of his power Moses again rebuked Satan, who with trembling and
gnashing of teeth, departed from him. Moses bore record of all these
things, but because of the wickedness of men it is not had among them.
The Work and Glory of the Lord
After this trying scene the Lord again spoke with Moses
who was commissioned to deliver the people of Israel from bondage. His
eyes were opened and he beheld many lands and their inhabitants without
number. The Lord taught him, and explained that there were many heavens
and many earths like this on which we stand. They are innumerable to man,
yet the Lord knows them all and they are numbered unto him. These earths
were peopled by his children, for his work and his glory are to bring to
pass the immortality and eternal life of man. Therefore, as one earth and
its accompanying heaven shall pass away, having filled the measure of its
creation, so shall others come. There is no end to the works and the words
of the Father, for in this there is eternal progression. However, our
knowledge, in the wisdom of the Lord, is, of necessity, limited to the
earth on which we dwell.
Other Important Revelations
The information contained in this ancient scripture
caused the hearts of the brethren to rejoice. The Lord continued to pour
out knowledge upon them, here a little, and there a little, as they were
able to receive it. Early in July (1830) another revelation was given to
Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery, in Harmony, Pennsylvania. They were
commanded to return to the Saints in Colesville, Manchester and Fayette,
and the members would support them. They should expound the scriptures and
devote their time exclusively to the cause of Zion, and if the members
should not support them in these labors, then would the Lord withdraw his
blessings. “Be patient in affliction,” said the Lord, “for thou shalt have
many: but endure them, for lo, I am with thee, even unto the end of thy
days.” The afflictions surely came, for Joseph Smith was called on to
suffer, as few men have had to suffer. He was to attend to his calling,
for the Lord would withhold his power in temporal things that he should
not have strength.
Oliver Cowdery was also commanded to continue in the
ministry and not suppose that he could say enough in the cause, and if he
would be faithful the Lord would open his mouth and he should have
strength such as is not known among men. This promise was fulfilled, for
the Lord blessed Oliver in preaching to that extent that those who heard
him were caused to quake and tremble.1 Power was given to
these men to bless or curse; those who received them they were to bless,
and from those who rejected them they were to withhold their blessing and
to wash their feet against them as a testimony. Should any lay violent
hands upon them, they should command them to be smitten, and the Lord
would smite them in his own due time. They were to take neither purse nor
scrip, neither two coats, as they went forth to prune the vineyard, with a
mighty pruning, “even for the last time.”
Emma Smith to Select Hymns
In the same month (July, 1830) the Lord gave a
revelation to Emma Smith, the wife of Joseph Smith, in which she was
commanded not to murmur because of the things which she had not seen. As
many other wives have thought, she could not understand why her husband
should withhold from her a view of sacred things. The Lord assured her
that it was for a wise purpose, in him, that these things were withheld,
except from the few who were called to be witnesses to the world. She was
called “an elect lady” whose duty it was to expound scripture, and exhort
the Church, as she was directed by the Spirit; but more especially was she
called to assist her husband in writing and to be his scribe, that Oliver
Cowdery might be relieved to attend to other duties. She was also chosen
to make a selection of sacred hymns for the Church, “for,” said the Lord,
“my soul delighteth in the song of the heart, yea, the song of the
righteous is a prayer unto me, and it shall be answered with a blessing
upon their heads.” If she would continue in meekness, and beware of pride,
and keep the commandments of the Lord, she should receive a crown of
righteousness; except she did this, where the Lord was she should not
come, which truth applied to all.
Notes
Statement of President Wilford Woodruff, Deseret
News, March 3, 1889.
Chapter 14
Oliver Cowdery’s Error
Another revelation given in July, 1830, instructed
Joseph Smith, Oliver Cowdery and John Whitmer, to devote their time to the
study of the scriptures, to preaching and confirming the Church in
Colesville, and performing such labors as should be required of them,
until after they should go to the west to hold conference. All things were
to be done in the Church by common consent, in prayer and faith. Oliver
Cowdery returned to Fayette and Joseph began to arrange the revelations
ready for recording. In this work he was assisted by John Whitmer. While
they were thus engaged a letter was received from Oliver Cowdery
commanding Joseph “in the name of God to erase” certain words from one of
the revelations, “that no priestcraft be amongst us.” Joseph immediately
answered by letter that he could not alter the revelations of the Lord. It
became necessary, however, for him to make a trip to Fayette to correct
the error in Oliver’s mind, for the latter had convinced several others
that the revelation was wrong. After some difficulty and earnest prayer,
they were all convinced that the words of the revelation were right, and
peace again prevailed.
Instructions on the Sacrament
In the month of August, Newel Knight and his wife came
to Harmony on a visit. As the wives of Newel Knight and Joseph Smith had
neither of them been confirmed, that matter was attended to at this time.
A meeting was held in which the four and John Whitmer participated, and
desiring to partake of the sacrament, Joseph set out to purchase some
wine. He had not proceeded far from his door when he was met by an angel
who gave him the following commandment:
“Listen to the voice of Jesus Christ, your Lord, your
God, and your Redeemer, whose word is quick and powerful. For behold, I
say unto you, that it mattereth not what ye shall eat, or what ye shall
drink, when ye partake of the sacrament, if it so be that ye do it with
an eye single to my glory; remembering unto the Father my body which was
laid down for you, and my blood which was shed for the remission of your
sins. Wherefore, a commandment I give unto you, that you shall not
purchase wine, neither strong drink of your enemies: Wherefore, you
shall partake of none, except it is made new among you; yea, in this my
Father’s kingdom which shall be built up on the earth.”
This is one of the many important revelations (Doc. and
Cov. Sec. 27) given to the Church. The knowledge that it matters not what
we eat or drink, if we partake of the sacrament in the Spirit of the Lord
and by divine authority, is the foundation for the present practice in the
Church of using water instead of wine, for so the Lord has commanded.
In September the Lord added to this revelation stating
that the time would come when he would “drink of the fruit of the vine” on
the earth with the ancient prophets and apostles, from Michael, or Adam,
the “ancient of days,” down to our own day, including all the faithful
whom the Father has given him out of the world.
In obedience to the above commandment, they prepared
wine of their own making and partook of the sacrament, confirming the two
sisters as members of the Church.
Joseph Moves to Fayette
The spirit of persecution became so strong in Harmony,
that Joseph Smith was forced to leave and take up his residence in
Fayette. Even his father-in-law, Isaac Hale, turned against him because of
the falsehoods which were circulated and the prejudice existing in the
neighborhood. This bitterness he retained throughout his life. In August,
Joseph and Hyrum Smith, with John and David Whitmer, went to Colesville
and visited the members of the Church residing there. They prayed that the
eyes of their enemies might be blinded, for the enmity in Colesville was
extreme. Their prayers were answered, and though they passed by a number
of the most bitter of the mobocrats, who looked intently upon them, yet
they were not recognized. In the evening of the day of their arrival—
a meeting was held and those who had been previously baptized were all
confirmed. They partook of the sacrament, sang and praised the Lord in
testimony without molestation. The next morning the brethren took leave of
the Saints in peace and in due time arrived home in safety.
Spurious Revelations of Hiram Page
Shortly after Joseph Smith made his home in Fayette,
Satan commenced a subtle attack upon the work within the Church. Hiram
Page, one of the eight witnesses, obtained a stone with which he was
receiving revelations purporting to be for the guidance of the Church; but
these revelations were at variance with those given to Joseph Smith, and
also with the teachings of the Savior and his apostles, as contained in
the New Testament. Oliver Cowdery and members of the Whitmer family were
deceived. Through the Prophet the Lord gave a revelation to Oliver Cowdery
in which the order of heaven, in regard to revelation, was pointed out for
the guidance of the Church. “Behold, verily, verily, I say unto thee,”
said the Lord, “no one shall be appointed to receive commandments and
revelations in this Church, excepting my servant Joseph Smith, Jun., for
he receiveth them even as Moses; and thou shalt be obedient unto the
things which I shall give unto him, even as Aaron, to declare faithfully
the commandments and the revelations, with power and authority in the
Church.” It was further stated that there should be none other appointed
to receive revelations, until the Lord should appoint another in his
stead, for he held the keys of this power. Oliver was instructed to take
Hiram Page, alone, and tell him that the revelations he had received were
not from the Lord, but were given through the power of Satan, who had
deceived him. Oliver was also instructed that he was to write by wisdom,
but he was not to command him who was at the head.
The Mission to the Lamanites
The Lord, in this revelation, appointed Oliver Cowdery
to take a mission to the Lamanites in the west, “and inasmuch as they
receive thy teachings,” it read, “thou shalt cause my Church to be
established among them.” There were other reasons for this mission, which
were not fully revealed. It is probable that in the spurious revelations
of Hiram Page some reference was made to the building of the city Zion. In
any case, the Lord explained that it was not revealed, and no man knew,
where the city Zion shall be built, “but it shall be given hereafter.
Behold, I say unto you, that it shall be on the borders of the Lamanites.”
This mission was not to be taken until after the conference which had been
appointed for the 26th of September. Oliver was also first to settle the
difficulty with Hiram Page, who was to be taught that he had not been
appointed to receive revelations for the Church.
The Doctrine of Gathering—Destruction of the
Wicked
Again the heavens were opened and the Lord made known
many of his purposes and decrees which were for these latter days. A
revelation (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 29) was given shortly before the second
conference of the Church, containing instruction which was helpful for the
guidance of the elders at that conference. They were taught the doctrine
of the gathering of the Saints. The decree had gone forth from the
mansions of the Father, that the Saints should be gathered into one place,
for they were chosen out of the world, and they were to prepare their
hearts against the day when tribulation and desolation would be sent forth
upon the wicked. The hour is nigh, the Lord declared, when the earth
should be ripe for destruction, for wickedness shall cease.
Because of the wickedness of the world, for the
inhabitants thereof will not repent, the Lord should send forth terrible
plagues to torment mankind. Great hailstorms should destroy the crops of
the earth; flies shall “take hold of the inhabitants” and eat their flesh;
their tongues shall be staid, and their flesh fall from their bones and
their eyes from their sockets. The beasts of the forests, and the fowls of
the air shall eat their bodies, and the great and abominable church, which
shall endure until the end of unrighteousness on the earth, shall be cast
down by devouring fire, as Ezekiel had said, for abomination must not
reign.
All these things were predicted by the apostles and must
be fulfilled; and the twelve who were with the Savior in his ministry
shall come in glory to judge the house of Israel who have been faithful,
“and none else.” The trump shall sound, the righteous dead will rise and
Christ reign on the earth with his Saints for a thousand years. After the
thousand years are ended, and men begin again to forsake the Lord, the
earth shall be spared but for a little season. The final resurrection
shall come; the righteous received in to eternal life and the wicked
banished to partake of the second death with the devil and his angels. The
second death is that same death which was first pronounced on Adam—
banishment from the presence of the Lord. Those who partake of it cannot
return, for they have no power. Then shall come the redemption of the
earth, for old things shall pass away and all things become new, yet not
“one hair, neither mote, shall be lost” for it is the workmanship of the
hands of the Lord.
The Second Conference of the Church
According to appointment, on the 26th of September, the
Church met in conference at Fayette. There were present eight elders, four
priests and two teachers when the conference convened. Thirty-five persons
had joined the Church, making a total of sixty-two in all. Joseph Smith
opened the meeting with prayer and then read the fifth chapter of Isaiah,
which speaks of the gathering, and made comments thereon. The matter of
Hiram Page’s “peepstone” was discussed and after considerable
investigation, Hiram Page and all who were present, renounced the stone,
and there was mutual satisfaction and happiness again. At this conference,
which continued for three days, the Spirit of the Lord was manifest; much
business was attended to, and those previously baptized were confirmed.
Special prayer was offered in behalf of Oliver Cowdery and Peter Whitmer,
Jr., who were called to go to the Lamanites. Peter Whitmer, Jr., was
called by revelation at this conference to that mission. When the
conference adjourned it was to meet January 1, 1831, and David Whitmer was
appointed to keep the record. There were some baptisms during the
conference and a number of the brethren were ordained.
The Call to Ziba Peterson and Parley P. Pratt
A great desire being made manifest on the part of others
to accompany Oliver Cowdery and Peter Whitmer, Jr., to the Lamanites, it
was made a matter of inquiry before the Lord. The result was that Ziba
Peterson and Parley P. Pratt were also appointed to go. Ziba Peterson was
among the first baptized and was an elder at the first conference of the
Church. Parley P. Pratt was a resident of the wilderness of Ohio not far
from the city of Cleveland. While on a missionary tour for the “Disciples”
or “Campbellites,” as they are called, and a visit to his former home in
Columbia County, New York, he first heard of the Book of Mormon through a
Baptist preacher by the name of Hamlin, who placed a copy in his hands.
After reading it partly through Parley changed his plans and went to
Manchester in search of the Prophet Joseph Smith. There he met Hyrum Smith
who taught him the Gospel and presented him with a copy of the Book of
Mormon which he again very carefully read. Late in August, with Hyrum
Smith, he journeyed to Fayette, where he was baptized by Oliver Cowdery
about the first of September. Shortly afterwards he was ordained an elder
and then continued on his journey to his father’s home. There he preached
the Gospel to his parents and many of his boyhood friends. His younger
brother, Orson, a youth 19 years of age, readily accepted his message and
became a member of the Church. Returning to Fayette, Parley P. Pratt was
appointed by revelation to take the missionary journey with Oliver Cowdery
to the borders of Missouri, among the Lamanites.
The Missionaries Depart
In the fall of 1830, these four missionaries started on
their journey to the west. On their way they preached the Gospel among the
people as opportunity would permit. Near Buffalo, New York, they visited
the Catteraugus Indians and left two copies of the Book of Mormon with
members of the tribe who could read, and then continued on their journey.
When they came to Kirtland, Ohio, near the home of Elder Pratt, they
tarried for some time. Parley P. Pratt was acquainted with Mr. Sidney
Rigdon, one of the leaders of the “Disciples,” who with Alexander Campbell
and Walter Scott, had been instrumental in the founding of that sect. They
believed in the doctrines of faith, repentance and baptism for the
remission of sins; but accepted the Bible as the only guide unto
salvation. Convinced that the religious world had gone astray, these men
had formed this organization with sincere desire to follow closely the
teachings of the early disciples of the Lord. Through his preaching Sidney
Rigdon had converted many souls unto this faith.
Parley P. Pratt, believing that many of the “Disciples”
would readily receive the truth, had persuaded his fellow missionaries to
spend some time among them in Ohio where they were located on what was
called the “Western Reserve.”
Sidney Rigdon
The first house at which they called, in Mentor, was the
home of Sidney Rigdon. After the usual greetings, they presented Mr.
Rigdon with a copy of the Book of Mormon, stating that it contained the
record of the ancient people of America, and that the Lord had again
established his Church in the earth with the authority of the Holy
Priesthood. This was the first time Sidney Rigdon had heard of the Book of
Mormon and of Joseph Smith. Replying to their statements, he said he had
the Bible, which he believed to be the word of God; as for the Book of
Mormon, he had considerable doubt of its divinity. He refused to argue
with them, but promised to read the book. At their earnest solicitation
Sidney Rigdon allowed the elders to hold meetings in his chapel. A large
congregation assembled and gave close attention to the remarks of the
elders. At the conclusion of the services Sidney Rigdon instructed the
people to consider carefully the remarkable things they had heard, lest it
should prove to be the truth. With deep and earnest study, he read the
contents of the Book of Mormon, praying for divine guidance, and in the
course of about two weeks, he received a manifestation so that he could
say, “Flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto me, but my Father, which
is in heaven.” He and his wife were then baptized and also many of his
congregation.
In Kirtland the elders were also successful. The people
besieged the missionaries both day and night, until they had very little
time for rest. The greater number heard the tidings gladly, but some,
there were, who came to dispute and oppose the work of the Lord. In a very
short time branches of the Church were established numbering in all about
one thousand souls.
The Journey Continued
The missionary elders continued on their journey after a
stay of two or three weeks in Kirtland, leaving a number of the new
converts to continue with the work. Sidney Rigdon, Frederick G. Williams,
Isaac Morley, John Murdock, Lyman Wight and Edward Partridge later became
members of the Church and were ordained to the Priesthood.
Having accomplished this great work, and leaving
watchmen for the tender flock, the missionaries took Dr. Frederick G.
Williams with them. About fifty miles west of Kirtland, they passed
through the country where Parley P. Pratt first made settlement in the
western country. Here, again, they made a stop and preached the Gospel.
The people were all excited over the things they had heard, for the
knowledge of the labors of the brethren had preceded them. Other converts
were made, including Simeon Carter, and although some opposition and
bitterness was manifest, in the course of a short time a branch was raised
up numbering about sixty souls. Arriving near the border of Ohio, the
missionaries spent some days among the Wyandots, who received them kindly
and rejoiced in the story of their fathers as they learned it from the
Book of Mormon. In the city of Cincinnati they spent several days, and
being disappointed in not being able to take boat, continued on their
journey afoot to St. Louis. In the midst of winter weather, and suffering
great hardships in a country little traveled by man, they pursued their
journey till they arrived at Independence, Jackson County, Missouri, at
that time scarcely more than a trading post on the borders of the United
States. They reached Independence early in the year 1831; their journey
had taken them a distance of nearly fifteen hundred miles, through a
wilderness, in the most inclement season of the year. Four months had they
been upon the journey, but during that time they had preached the Gospel
to many thousands of white people and two nations of Indians. Churches had
been built up and the work advanced along the route of their travels. This
was the first missionary journey west of the state of New York, and its
results were to be of incalculable benefit to the Church in years to come.
The Book of Mormon Taken to the Lamanites
In the land of the Lamanites, the elders preached the
Gospel to the Delawares, presenting them with the Book of Mormon which
they received with rejoicing. Oliver Cowdery explained to them in detail
the coming forth of the Book of Mormon. A Mr. Pool, who believed the
testimony of these elders, became their interpreter. Several of the
Indians could read, and to them they gave copies of the Book of Mormon.
The Indians answered them by saying: “We feel thankful to our white
friends who have come so far, and been at such pains to tell us good news,
and especially this new news concerning the book of our forefathers; it
makes us glad in here,” and the speaker for the tribe placed his hand on
his heart. This good labor, however, was not to last, for the excitement
reached the settlements in Missouri, and due to the efforts of sectarian
priests the Indian agents ordered the missionaries out of the Indian
country as disturbers of the peace, threatening to use military force in
case of non-compliance. With disappointment they withdrew and thus ended
the first mission to the Lamanites. From this time on they devoted their
labors to the white people in Jackson County. However, they had declared
the message of salvation to three great tribes, the Catteraugus, in New
York, the Wyandots of Ohio, and the Delawares, west of Missouri.
It was now decided that Parley P. Pratt should return to
Kirtland, and perhaps to New York to report their labors, visit the
branches they had organized on their journey, and procure more books. In
February he started on his journey, alone. In Kirtland he met the Prophet,
who had come to that place, and to him he made a report.
Part Three
The Ohio and Missouri Period
Chapter 15
“A Crooked Generation”
In October 1830, Ezra Thayer and Northrop Sweet were
called by revelation, as they had sought the will of the Lord, to preach
the Gospel unto “a crooked and perverse generation.” “My vineyard,”
declared the Lord, “has become corrupt every whit; and there is none which
doth good save it be a few; and they err in many instances because of
priestcrafts; all having corrupt minds. And verily, verily, I say unto
you, that this Church have I established and called forth out of the
wilderness: and even so will I gather mine elect from the four quarters of
the earth, even as many as will believe in me, and hearken unto my voice.”
Call of Edward Partridge and Orson Pratt
In November Orson Pratt, the younger brother of Parley
P. Pratt, who had been baptized by his brother Parley a few weeks earlier
in Canaan, Columbia County, N. Y., came to Fayette to learn the will
of the Lord concerning himself. In the following December Sidney Rigdon
came from Ohio on a similar visit, bringing with him a young man named
Edward Partridge, who was not a member of the Church. Edward Partridge,
the day after his arrival, satisfied with what he had seen and heard, was
baptized by Joseph Smith and later was confirmed by Sidney Rigdon. Both of
these young men, Orson Pratt and Edward Partridge, were called to labor in
the ministry and received the commendation and blessing of the Lord for
their faith and desire to serve him. “And this commandment,” said the
Lord, “shall be given unto the elders of my Church, that every man which
will embrace it with singleness of heart, may be ordained and sent forth,
even as I have spoken.”
Sidney Rigdon to Write
Sidney Rigdon was commanded to be a companion to Joseph
Smith and to “forsake him not;” moreover, he was to write for him, “and
the scriptures shall be given, even as they are in mine own bosom, to the
salvation of mine elect,” was the word of the Lord to him.
Lost Scriptures Restored
By commandment of the Lord, a revision of the scriptures
by inspiration had already commenced. Much conjecture frequently occurred
among the Saints regarding scripture mentioned in the Bible that could not
be found. They had learned in the reading of the Book of Mormon, “that
many plain and precious things” had been taken away from the Bible as it
went forth among the Gentiles. Many of these the Lord promised to restore.
From time to time, as their labors would permit, the Prophet received by
revelation these scriptures which, were lost, and Sidney Rigdon wrote for
him. Shortly after the coming of Sidney Rigdon to Fayette, the Lord
revealed the writings of Enoch, spoken of by Jude, which caused much
rejoicing among the Saints. These revelations now form a part of the Book
of Moses, in the Pearl of Great Price.
Command to Go to Ohio
Soon after the restoration of the words of Enoch, the
Lord commanded that the correction of the scriptures should cease until
Joseph Smith and companions could remove to Ohio. Such a step was
necessary, the Lord declared, “because of the enemy and for your sakes.”
However, they were not to go in haste, but first to strengthen the several
branches of the Church in New York; especially that at Colesville, where
the members exercised much faith. Not only were Joseph and the brethren
with him to go to Ohio, but the Lord instructed all the Saints in New York
also to journey there, “against the time” when Oliver Cowdery should
return from the Lamanites.
Conference of January, 1831
In January, 1831, a conference was held in Fayette.
Ordinary business was transacted and a revelation given in which the Lord
made known the reason for the removal of the Church to the West (Doc. and
Cov. Sec. 38). “All eternity is pained,” the revelation read, “and the
angels are waiting the great command to reap down the earth, to gather the
tares that they may be burned.” This was because “all flesh is corrupted”
and the powers of darkness prevail. The Lord revealed that the wicked were
plotting in secret chambers the destruction of Joseph Smith and the
Church. However, he would lead the Saints, to a land of promise, and they
and their children after them should possess it forever, if they would
seek it with all their hearts as an inheritance. This reference was to
Zion, the location of which the Lord had not yet revealed. They were
commanded to assemble in Ohio, and there he would give unto them his law
and these things should be made known. They were to dispose of their
property as best they could; farms that could not be sold should be
rented, and men of wisdom were to be appointed to look after the interests
of the poor and needy and send them forth to the place the Lord commanded
them.
In the latter part of January, Joseph Smith and his
wife, accompanied by Sidney Rigdon and Edward Partridge, moved to
Kirtland. They were welcomed there by Newel K. Whitney, and Joseph and his
wife remained in the Whitney home for several weeks receiving every
kindness and attention which could be shown in Christian love.
The Branch in Kirtland
The branch of the Church in Kirtland had been living
according to a plan called “common stock” or the holding of all property
in common. This arrangement had been in practice before they joined the
Church, but false spirits crept in among them causing them to receive
strange notions in variance with the Gospel plan. With a little caution
and exercise of wisdom, the Prophet persuaded them to abandon this plan
and their difficulties were removed.
The Law Given to Govern the Church
On the fourth of February, the Lord gave direction by
revelation that the elders of the Church should assemble together to agree
on his word; for he would give them his law by which the Church was to be
governed. Instructions were also given that Joseph Smith should have a
house built wherein he could live and translate, and receive the ancient
scriptures from the Lord. Edward Partridge was to receive the office of
bishop in the Church and to spend all his time in that ministry, leaving
his merchandise, to labor in the interests of the members of the Church.
At Kirtland, on the 9th of February, in the presence of
twelve elders, the Lord revealed his law by which the Church was to be
governed, according to the promise given in Fayette. This important
revelation (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 42) may be termed a code of laws for the
government and guidance of the members of the Church. Their attitude
towards the law of the land as well as the moral law was clearly
established. As members of the Church they were to keep the Church
covenants and articles, and the Lord would reveal unto them, from time to
time, other covenants sufficient to establish them in Ohio and later in
the New Jerusalem, or city of Zion, the site of which would presently be
revealed. The duties of the bishop and other officers in the Church were
defined. Idlers were condemned; for, said the Lord, “the idler shall not
eat the bread nor wear the garments of the laborer.” The Bible and the
Book or Mormon were to be the standards on doctrine, and they who have not
the Spirit were not to teach. The manner of administering to the sick was
explained, and the Saints instructed to live together in love. This is one
of the very important revelations given to the Church.
A Woman’s “Revelation”
Soon after this revelation was given a woman named
Hubble came among the people pretending to have revelations, and
professing to be a prophetess of the Lord. By declaring that the Book of
Mormon was the word of the Lord, and appearing to be very righteous, she
deceived some of the Saints.
For the benefit of the members a revelation was received
by Joseph Smith in which the Church was instructed to hearken to him, for
there was none other appointed to receive revelations for the Church, and
none other should be appointed while he lived, if he remained true to his
trust. This commandment had previously been given, when Hiram Page was led
into error; but it seemed the Lord must speak again on this point before
the Saints could understand. The members of the Church were instructed to
purge themselves from all iniquity, and the Lord would give them
knowledge, even the mysteries of his kingdom would be revealed, if they
would sustain and assist Joseph Smith. The elders were instructed to go
forth and preach the Gospel, laboring in the vineyard for the last time,
for the Lord would shortly come upon the earth in judgment.
Important Revelations to The Church
During the spring and summer of 1831, a number of
important revelations were received. On March 7, the Lord made known many
things (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 45) pertaining to his second coming and the
signs of the times. After revealing in clearness the teachings given to
his disciples in Jerusalem, relative to the destruction of the temple, the
scattering of the Jews, and the signs which should precede his second
coming, he made known many things which should take place in the day in
which we live. He spoke of the signs and wonders; of the gathering of the
Jews; the darkening of the sun and the bathing of the moon in blood; of
his second coming and his judgments upon the nations; the redemption of
the Jews, who shall look upon him whom they have pierced; the binding of
Satan; the millennial reign, and the redemption of heathen nations and
those who knew no law.
Zion a Place of Refuge
Zion, the New Jerusalem, shall be built and there the
righteous shall come to Zion from among all nations, singing songs of
everlasting joy. They will be the only people who will not be at war, and
every man who will not take up his sword against his neighbor, must flee
to Zion for safety. Such is to be the condition of the world before the
coming of the Lord.
John Whitmer, Historian
In another revelation John Whitmer was appointed to keep
the records of the Church, and assist Joseph Smith in transcribing all
things given for the history.
“For,” said the revelation, “Oliver Cowdery I have
appointed to another office. Wherefore it shall be given him (Whitmer) in
as much as he is faithful, by the Comforter, to write these things.”
The Purchase of Lands
As the Saints in New York had been commanded to settle
in Ohio, the residents in that place were instructed to impart of their
lands, as they were able to do, for the benefit of their brethren from the
east for it was needful that they should remain in Ohio for a time.
Eventually, however, it was expected that they would move farther
westward, and the members of the Church were to save their money for the
purpose of buying lands for an inheritance in the city Zion, when the
location of that place should be revealed. This information should be made
known when the brethren arrived from the east, for to them it was to be
revealed. “And they shall be appointed to purchase the lands, and to make
a commencement to lay the foundation of the city, and then shall you begin
to be gathered with your families, every man according to his family—
as is appointed to him by the presidency and the bishop of the Church.”
Equality Among the Families
In the month of May the Saints from New York commenced
to arrive in Ohio, and it fell to the lot of Bishop Partridge to assign to
them their lands. They were to be made equal according to their families
and their needs. The head of each family was to receive a certificate to
secure him and his portion and inheritance in the Church. Should a man
transgress, after receiving his portion and standing, he was not to have
power to claim that portion which had been consecrated to the bishop for
the use of the poor and needy of the Church; but he could retain that
portion which was deeded to him. A storehouse was to be provided and the
substance of the people, more than needful for individual use, was to be
placed therein, for the wants of the people, to be kept by the bishop, who
was to distribute it as the necessities of the people should demand. In
this manner the doctrine of consecration was partially put into practice,
as a preparatory step before the members of the Church should go to Zion
—for in Zion the law of the united order, or consecration of
properties, was the law upon which that city should be built. “And thus I
grant unto this people,” the Lord declared, with reference to the New York
Saints, “a privilege of organizing themselves according to my laws; and I
consecrate unto them this land for a little season, until I, the Lord,
shall provide for them otherwise, and command them to go hence.”
The Important Conference of June 1831
In the month of February the Lord had commanded that
word be sent out to the elders of the Church calling them from the east
and from the west; from the north and from the south; to meet in
conference and receive instruction. Accordingly, a conference was set for
June 3, which convened at Kirtland and continued until the sixth. The
Spirit of the Lord was displayed in a marvelous way, and the power of the
evil one, which was made manifest in opposition to the work, was
successfully rebuked.
The First High Priests Ordained
At this conference the first high priests in this
dispensation were ordained. Lyman Wight, John Murdock, Reynolds Cahoon,
Harvey Whitlock and Hyrum Smith, were ordained to the office of high
priest, by Joseph Smith the Prophet; Joseph Smith, Sen., Joseph Smith the
Prophet, Parley P. Pratt, Thomas B. Marsh, Isaac Morley, Edward Partridge,
Joseph Wakefield, Martin Harris, Ezra Thayer, Ezra Booth, John Corrill,
Samuel H. Smith, John Whitmer and Sidney Rigdon, were ordained to the
office of high priest, under the hands of Lyman Wight. Edward Partridge,
the bishop of the Church, then blessed those who had been ordained. John
Corrill and Isaac Morley were then sustained and ordained as assistants,
or counselors, to Bishop Whitney, under the hands of Lyman Wight. All this
was done by commandment from the Lord.
The Mission of John
During the conference, Joseph Smith the Prophet was led
to say, “that John the Revelator was then among the ten tribes of Israel
who had been led away by Shalmaneser, king of Assyria, to prepare them for
their return from their long dispersion.”
The Elders Called to Missouri
The spirit of prophecy was abundantly manifest and
during the sessions of this conference a number of revelations were
received. Many of the elders were called to take their journey through the
western country, going two by two, preaching the Gospel, and were to
assemble again in Jackson County, Missouri, where the next conference was
to be held. The Lord said to them: “And thus, even as I have said if ye
are faithful, ye shall assemble yourselves together to rejoice upon the
land of Missouri, which is the land of your inheritance, which is now the
land of your enemies. But, behold, I the Lord, will hasten the city in its
time, and will crown the faithful with joy and with rejoicing.”
The Thompson Branch
The members of the Church from Colesville, New York, on
their arrival in Ohio, were located at a place called Thompson, about
sixteen miles northwest of Kirtland. Here, as we have learned, they were
directed to live according to the Lord’s law, that is, the order of
stewardship and consecration of properties. Among these people there
resided a man named Leman Copley, who was a member of the “Shaking
Quakers” before he joined the Church. He owned a large tract of land which
he agreed to turn over to the Colesville branch to occupy in this manner
of stewardship, agreeable with the revelation they had received. It
appears that Copley had not been fully converted to the Gospel and he,
with some others, later rebelled and broke the covenant of consecration.
This caused confusion among the Colesville Saints and placed them at the
mercy of their enemies, as well as in jeopardy before the Lord. In their
distress they sent Newel Knight, who was in charge of the branch at
Thompson, to the Prophet to learn what they should do. The Lord spoke unto
them saying that their covenant had been broken and therefore was of no
effect, and it would have been better for the one who was responsible for
the offense, “had he been drowned in the depth of the sea.” The members of
the branch were now commanded to journey to Missouri, “unto the borders of
the Lamanites,” and there they were to seek “a living like unto men,”
until the Lord might prepare a place for them. Almost immediately they
took their departure under the guidance of Newel Knight, for Missouri.
A Letter from Missouri
A few days following the conference a letter was
received from Oliver Cowdery, dated May 7, giving an account of the labors
of himself and companions in Missouri. He spoke of their labors among the
Lamanites, and of a tribe of “Navashoes” farther to the west, near Santa
Fe. Almost the whole country where he and his fellow laborers were
located, he declared, consisted of “Universalists, Atheists,
Presbyterians, Methodists, Baptists, and other professing Christians,
priests and people; with all the devils from the infernal pit, united and
foaming out their shame,” against the elders of the Church. Then he adds:
“God forbid that I should bring a railing accusation against them, for
vengeance belongs to him who is able to pay.” His expressed opinion of
these inhabitants of the border land was all too true, as events
immediately to follow will attest.
The Mission to the West
About the middle of June (1831) the elders who were
appointed at the conference, commenced their journey westward, traveling
two by two. Ezra Thayer, the companion chosen for Thomas B. Marsh, failed
to go. Selah J. Griffin was appointed to go in his stead. On the 19th of
June, Joseph Smith, Sidney Rigdon, Martin Harris, Edward Partridge,
William W. Phelps, Joseph Coe, and Algernon Sidney Gilbert, took up their
journey for Missouri. All these missionaries, and others not here
mentioned, commenced their travels with great anticipation of what the
result would be. Their destination was the “land of their inheritance,”
where Zion—the New Jerusalem—should be built. The Lord had
promised that the site for this holy city should be revealed to them at
their journey’s end.
Chapter 16
Character of Inhabitants
About the middle of July, 1831, the missionaries
commenced to arrive in western Missouri, and were met with tears of joy by
their brethren there. Here, on the borders of the United States, had
gathered renegades from the east; lawless and vile outcasts, who had been
forced to flee to the west for safety. “How natural it was,” wrote the
Prophet, “to observe the degradation, leanness of intellect, ferocity, and
jealousy, of a people that were nearly a century behind the times.”
First Sabbath in Zion
The first Sabbath (July 17, 1831), the elders spent in
Jackson County, William W. Phelps preached a public discourse. His
congregation was composed of “specimens of all the families of the earth.”
After this meeting two persons, who had previously believed, were baptized.
Arrival of the Colesville Branch
A few days later the members of the Colesville branch,
from Thompson, Ohio, arrived in Missouri and were located on lands in Kaw
township, where a portion of Kansas City is now built.
Assignment of Labors
The duty devolved on the Prophet to assign the labors to
the several elders who were to remain in the Land. Some of them were
called by revelation to make their permanent settlement in Missouri, while
others were instructed to return to the eastern lands, after their mission
in the west was finished. William W. Phelps, who joined the Church at the
time the little band of missionaries were leaving Ohio for Missouri, had
previously been instructed by the Lord (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 55) to engage
with Oliver Cowdery, in the work of printing and selecting and writing
books for schools in the Church, that “little children also may receive
instruction” which would be pleasing to the Lord. Upon his arrival in
Jackson County, this commandment was repeated.
Algernon Sidney Gilbert was appointed to act as agent
for the Church in receiving moneys and buying lands on which the Saints
might locate. Edward Partridge was to act in his calling as bishop of the
Church. His great duty was to divide the inheritances of the members,
severally, according to their needs. In this manner duties were assigned
to each of those expected to remain as a nucleus for the building up of
Zion (Doc. and Cov. Sections 57–58).
Location of the City Revealed
As the Lord had promised, he now fulfilled. In answer to
the questions: “When will the wilderness blossom as the rose? When will
Zion be built up in her glory, and where will thy temple stand, unto which
all nations shall come in the last days?” the Lord gave the following:
“Hearken, O ye elders of my Church, saith the Lord
your God, who have assembled yourselves together, according to my
commandments, in this land, which is the land of Missouri, which is the
land which I have appointed and consecrated for the gathering of the
Saints: wherefore this is the land of promise, and the place for the
city of Zion. And thus saith the Lord your God, if you will receive
wisdom, here is wisdom: behold, the place which is now called
Independence, is the center place, and the spot for the temple is lying
westward, upon a lot which is not far from the court house. Wherefore it
is wisdom that the land should be purchased by the Saints; and also
every tract lying westward even unto the line running directly between
Jew and Gentile. And also every tract bordering by the prairies,
inasmuch as my disciples are enabled to buy lands. Behold, this is
wisdom, that they may obtain it for an everlasting inheritance” (Doc.
and Cov. Sec. 57).
The Saints to Keep the Law
In another revelation (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 58) given at
this time, the members of the Church were commanded to keep the law the
Lord had given them, as well as to observe the laws of the land. “Let no
man think he is ruler,” it read, “but let God rule him that judgeth,
according to the counsel of his own will; or, in other words, him that
counseleth or sitteth upon the judgment seat. Let no man break the laws of
the land, for he that keepeth the laws of God hath no need to break the
laws of the land: wherefore, be subject to the powers that be, until he
reigns whose right it is to reign, and subdues all enemies under his feet.”
After Much Tribulation, the Blessings
That Zion was to be established and the city built at
once, was evidently the idea possessed by some of the Saints; moreover,
that they were at liberty to establish their own laws, independent of all
else. Hence the instructions as here given by the Lord regarding the
keeping of the law. The Lord had warned them previously and given
instruction in regard to their duties and requirements in that land. That
the city was not to be built at that time is indicated in his word: “Ye
cannot behold with your natural eyes, for the present time, the design of
your God concerning those things which shall come hereafter, and the glory
which shall follow after much tribulation. For after much tribulation
cometh the blessings. Wherefore the day cometh that ye shall be crowned
with much glory; the hour is not yet, but is nigh at hand. Remember this,
which I tell you before, that you may lay it to heart, and receive that
which shall follow. Behold, verily I say unto you, for this cause I have
sent you that you might be obedient, and that your hearts might be
prepared to bear testimony of the things which are to come and also that
you might be honored of laying the foundation, and of bearing record of
the land upon which the Zion of God shall stand” (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 58).
From this we see that the glory and greatness of the
city Zion was reserved for the future; although in the scriptural sense,
the time “is nigh at hand.” These early settlers were to lay the
foundation, and prepare the way for the Saints, who were yet to come,
after the preaching of the Gospel “to the uttermost parts of the earth;”
for the elders were to “push the people together from the ends of the
earth.” It was a great honor conferred upon the first laborers in the
vineyard, if they would be faithful to every command.
Dedication of the Land
The Colesville Saints were located in Kaw township. The
Prophet assisted them in laying the first log, “for a house, as a
foundation of Zion” in that place. The log was carried by twelve men
representing the twelve tribes of Israel. At the same time it was made
manifest through prayer that the land should be consecrated and dedicated
by Sidney Rigdon. “It was a season of joy,” the Prophet said, “to those
present, and afforded a glimpse of the future, which time will yet unfold
to the satisfaction of the faithful.” All this took place on the second
day of August, 1831.
Sidney Rigdon, according to his appointment, stood up
and asked:
“Do you receive this land for the land of your
inheritance, with thankful hearts, from the Lord?”
“We do.”
“Do you pledge yourselves to keep the law of God on this
land, which you never have kept in your own lands?”
“We do.”
“Do you pledge yourselves to see that others of your
brethren who shall come hither do keep the laws of God?”
“We do.”
After prayer, Elder Rigdon arose and said: “I now
pronounce this land consecrated and dedicated unto the Lord for a
possession and inheritance for the Saints, and for all the faithful
servants of the Lord, to the uttermost ages of time, in the name of Jesus
Christ, having authority from him. Amen” (Documentary
History of the Church, vol. 1:196).
Description of the Land
In addition to the appointment to dedicate the land,
Sidney Rigdon was also called by revelation to write a description of it,
to be sent “unto all the churches.” One object of this description was to
stir up the Saints to donate for the purchase of the lands, by placing in
the hands of the bishop money for that purpose. Those who would do this
should be given an inheritance, for Zion was to be built by purchase;
otherwise they could not obtain it except by the shedding of blood, which
was forbidden. The first description written was rejected by the Lord, and
Sidney Rigdon was commanded to write another.
The Future Glory of Zion
Many of the ancient prophets spoke of Zion and her
glory. Isaiah declared that in the latter days “out of Zion shall go forth
the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem,” in that day when swords
will be made into plowshares, and spears into pruning-hooks.”1
Moreover, again he prophesied, saying:
“For the nation and kingdom that will not serve thee
shall perish; yea, those nations shall be utterly wasted. The glory of
Lebanon shall come unto thee, the fir tree, the pine tree, and the box
together, to beautify the place of my sanctuary; and I will make the
place of my feet glorious. The sons also of them that afflicted thee
shall come bending unto thee; and all they that despised thee shall bow
themselves down at the soles of thy feet; and they shall call thee, The
city of the Lord, The Zion of the Holy one of Israel. Whereas thou hast
been forsaken and hated, so that no man went through thee, I will make
thee an eternal excellency, a joy of many generations. . .
. For brass I will bring gold, and for iron I will bring silver,
and for wood brass, and for stones iron: I will also make thy officers
peace, and thine exactors righteousness. Violence shall no more be heard
in thy land, wasting nor destruction within thy borders; but thou shall
call thy walls Salvation, and thy gates Praise. The sun shall be no more
thy light by day; neither for brightness shall the moon give light unto
thee; but the Lord shall be unto thee an everlasting light, and thy God
thy glory. Thy son shall no more go down; neither shall thy moon
withdraw itself; for the Lord shall be thine everlasting light, and the
days of thy mourning shall be ended. Thy people also shall be all
righteous; they shall inherit the land forever, the branch of my
planting, the work of my hands, that I may be glorified. A little one
shall become a thousand, and a small one a strong nation: I the Lord
will hasten it in his time.”2
Dedication of the Temple Site
On the 3rd day of August, Joseph Smith, Oliver Cowdery,
Sidney Rigdon, Edward Partridge, William W. Phelps, Martin Harris and
Joseph Coe, met on a spot a little west of the Independence court house,
and there they dedicated the site for the great temple of the latter days.
The 87th Psalm was read, and the scene was most impressive; for here the
house of the Lord was to be reared in the holy city Zion, which had been
spoken of by ancient seers, from whence should go forth the law to the
ends of the earth.
First Conference in Zion
On the 4th day of August (1831) the first conference in
that land was held at the home of Joshua Lewis, in Kaw township. The
members of the Colesville branch formed the greater part of the
congregation—a total of thirty-one souls. The Spirit of the Lord was
with them and they rejoiced. Sidney Rigdon preached and exhorted the
Saints “to obedience to the requisition of heaven,” that they might be
planted in their inheritances in Zion. Ziba Peterson, who had been
silenced for wrongdoing, humbled himself and made confession; by unanimous
vote he was reinstated. Joseph Smith addressed the conference and
admonished the people to be true to their covenants that they might
receive the blessings.
A Commandment and a Promised Blessing
On the 7th, Polly Knight wife of Joseph Knight, Sen.,
died; she had been in failing health while on the westward journey. The
same day the Prophet received a revelation of commandment and blessing to
the Saints, in which they were admonished again to keep the commandments
of the Lord. Their course of action was pointed out for them with a
statement that all who had come up to the land to keep the commandments
should be blessed; if they lived they should inherit the earth; if they
died they should rest in the mansions of the Father. On the Lord’s day
they were to rest from all labor and assemble in the house of prayer to
partake of the sacrament and confess their sins (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 59).
The Return to Kirtland
On the 9th day of August Joseph Smith and the elders who
were to return, started on their journey back to Kirtland. They traveled
down the Missouri River towards St. Louis. On the third day out they
encountered some of the dangers common on these waters. At a place called
McIlwaine’s Bend, William W. Phelps, in open vision, saw the destroyer in
his power, riding upon the waters. The next morning the Prophet Joseph
received a revelation in confirmation of the vision of Elder Phelps.
Dangers on the Waters
The Lord revealed (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 61) to Joseph
Smith the great dangers that would be upon the waters in these latter
days. “Behold, I, the Lord, in the beginning blessed the waters, but in
the last days, by the mouth of my servant John, I cursed the waters.
Wherefore, the days will come that no flesh shall be safe upon the waters.
. . . I, the Lord, have decreed, and the destroyer rideth
upon the face thereof, and I revoke not the decree.” It was further stated
that the time would come when none would dare go upon the waters but those
who were pure in heart, and the elders were counseled to travel by other
means than by the rivers, that their faith fail not.
Object of the Mission to Zion
On the 27th day of August Joseph Smith, Oliver Cowdery
and Sidney Rigdon arrived in Kirtland; others of the elders had previously
arrived. Their mission had been fulfilled. They had gone to Missouri for
the purpose of receiving definite knowledge concerning the location of the
land and site for the future city of Zion; to dedicate the land as the
“inheritance of the Saints,” also to choose and dedicate a spot for the
building of the temple. Those who were to remain were instructed in their
duties and given commandments by which they were to be governed in that
land and upon which their inheritances, and those of the Saints who should
follow after, might be made secure.
Notes
Isaiah 2:1–4.
2. Isaiah 60:12–22. The following reference
to Zion or the New Jerusalem, is from the prophecy of Ether; Book of
Mormon, Ether, 13th chapter:
“Behold, Ether saw the day
of Christ, and he spake concerning a New Jerusalem upon this land. And he
spake also concerning the house of Israel, and the Jerusalem from whence
Lehi should come—after it should be destroyed it should be built up
again, a holy city unto the Lord; wherefore, it could not be a new
Jerusalem for it had been in a time of old; but it should be built up
again, and become a holy city of the Lord; and it should be built unto the
house of Israel—And that a New Jerusalem should be built upon this
land, unto the remnant of the seed of Joseph, for which things there has
been a type. For as Joseph brought his father down into the land of Egypt,
even so he died there; wherefore, the Lord brought a remnant of the seed
of Joseph out of the land of Jerusalem, that he might be merciful unto the
seed of Joseph that they should perish not, even as he was merciful unto
the father of Joseph that he should perish not. Wherefore, the remnant of
the house of Joseph shall be built upon this land; and it shall be a land
of their inheritance; and they shall build up a holy city unto the Lord,
like unto the Jerusalem of old; and they shall no more be confounded,
until the end come when the earth shall pass away. And there shall be a
new heaven and a new earth; and they shall be like unto the old save the
old have passed away, and all things have become new. And then cometh the
New Jerusalem; and blessed are they who dwell therein, for it is they
whose garments are white through the blood of the Lamb; and they are they
who are numbered among the remnant of the seed of Joseph, who were of the
house of Israel.”
Chapter 17
Glories—The Hiram Mobbing
Desire of the Saints for Knowledge of Zion
August 28, the day after the return of the brethren from
Missouri, fell on Sunday. An inspirational meeting was held at which the
brethren reported their labors. Among the business transacted was the
ordination of Oliver Cowdery to the office of high priest “by the voice of
the Church and the command of God, under the hand of Sidney Rigdon,” says
the record. Oliver Cowdery was in Missouri when the conference in June was
held, at which the first high priests were ordained.
As the Saints were very anxious to know more in relation
to Zion, the purchasing of lands there and their inheritances, the Prophet
inquired of the Lord, and received a revelation (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 63) in
which the difficulties and persecutions of the Saints in that land were
fore-shadowed. Again the people were cautioned and reproved wherein they
had not kept the commandments of the Lord. Among other things the Lord
declared the following:
“And now, verily, I say unto you, that as I said that
I would make known my will unto you, behold I will make it known unto
you, not by the way of commandment, for there are many who observe not
to keep my commandments; but unto him that keepeth my commandments, I
will give the mysteries of my kingdom, and the same shall be in him a
well of living water, springing up unto everlasting life. And now,
behold, this is the will of the Lord your God concerning his Saints,
that they should assemble themselves together unto the land of Zion, not
in haste, lest there should be confusion, which bringeth pestilence.
Behold, the land of Zion, I, the Lord, holdeth it in mine own hands;
nevertheless, I, the Lord, render unto Caesar the things which are
Caesar’s. Wherefore, I, the Lord, will that you should purchase the
lands that you may have advantage of the world, that you may have claim
on the world, that they may not be stirred up unto anger; for Satan
putteth it into their hearts to anger against you, and to the shedding
of blood. Wherefore the land of Zion shall not be obtained but by
purchase or by blood, otherwise there is none inheritance for you. And
if by purchase, behold you are blessed; and if by blood, as you are
forbidden to shed blood, lo, your enemies are upon you, and ye shall be
scourged from city to city, and from synagogue to synagogue, and but few
shall stand to receive an inheritance. I, the Lord, am angry with the
wicked; I am holding my Spirit from the inhabitants of the earth.”
Apostasy of Ezra Booth
In September Joseph Smith moved with his family to
Hiram, in Portage County, Ohio, about thirty miles southeast of Kirtland,
and commenced living at the home of John Johnson. About this time Ezra
Booth left the Church. He had been ordained a high priest, and had taken
the trip to Missouri, but had been rebellious. Before coming into the
Church he was a Methodist priest; but through the performance of a miracle
he was baptized, and from that time he desired to make men believe by the
performance of miracles, even by smiting them, or with forcible means.
After leaving the Church he wrote a number of articles against the truth
which were afterwards published in an anti-“Mormon” book.
Purchase of a Printing Press
As Oliver Cowdery and William W. Phelps had been called
to print and publish books and writings for the Church, it was necessary
that a printing press be purchased. William W. Phelps was instructed,
therefore, to call at Cincinnati on his return to Missouri, and purchase a
press for this purpose. This press was to be taken to Independence, where
they were to print a monthly paper to be called the
Evening and Morning Star. This was the first publication in the
Church.
Revision of the Bible
While residing at Hiram, Joseph Smith was engaged in the
revision of the Bible, which work was commenced in Fayette, but had been
delayed by command of the Lord until this time because of other duties
Sidney Rigdon, who also had located in Hiram, continued to write for him.
In course of time the Prophet went through the Bible, topic by topic,
revising as he was led by revelation. The work was never fully completed,
for he had intended, while at Nauvoo, a number of years later, to finish
the work, but was cut off by his enemies. Nevertheless, many plain and
precious things were revealed which throw great light upon many subjects.
Special Conference of November
As Oliver Cowdery and John Whitmer were appointed to go
to Missouri to attend to duties there, which had been assigned to them, a
special conference was called for November 1, 1831, to consider such
matters as might need attention before their departure.
Preparation for Publication of Commandments
At this special conference, which was held at Hiram, the
matter of publishing the revelations and commandments given through Joseph
Smith, was considered. This was the will of the Lord, for during that
conference he gave the revelation—one of the most important in the
Doctrine and Covenants—which he called “my preface unto the book of
my commandments, which I have given them to publish unto you, O
inhabitants of the earth” (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 1). These inhabitants were
commanded, as well as were the Saints, to “search these commandments, for
they are true and faithful, and the prophecies and promises which are in
them shall all be fulfilled.” The Lord was willing, “to make these things
known unto all flesh, for I am no respecter of persons,” he said, “and
will that all men shall know that the day speedily cometh; the hour is not
yet, but is nigh at hand, when peace shall be taken from the earth, and
the devil shall have power over his own dominion; and also the Lord shall
have power over his Saints, and shall reign in their midst, and shall come
down in judgment upon Idumea, or the world.”
Endorsement of the Revelations
It was decided that an edition of ten thousand copies of
the Book of Commandments should be published. However, at a later date
(May 1, 1832) this was changed to three thousand copies. Joseph Smith
addressed the elders and said, inasmuch as the Lord had bestowed a great
blessing upon them in giving commandments and revelations, he would ask
the conference what testimony they were willing to give regarding these
commandments which should shortly be sent to the world. After the reading
of the Lord’s preface, a number of the brethren arose and bore witness to
the truth of the revelations, which were to be published in the Book of
Commandments. The conference lasted two days and much other business was
transacted.
Criticism of the Revelations
Not all of those present at the conference fully
endorsed these revelations; there was one at least, who questioned their
language. This was William E. McLellin, who had but recently joined the
Church. The Prophet thereupon received a commandment from the Lord (Doc.
and Cov. Sec. 67) in which he was directed to invite the “most wise among
you” to choose out of the revelations the least, and attempt to make one
like unto it; and if this “wise” individual could duplicate the least of
the revelations, then the elders might be justified in saying they did not
“know that they are true.” If this proved to be a failure, then they would
be “under condemnation” if they did not bear record that they are true.
William E. McLellin’s Folly
William E. McLellin, as the wisest man, accepted the
challenge from the Lord. His attempt was a humiliating failure, to the
convincing of the elders present, who unitedly signified their willingness
to bear testimony to all the world, of the truth of the revelations given
to Joseph Smith.
Other Important Revelations
At the conclusion of this conference the Lord gave
another commandment (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 68) for the benefit of Orson Hyde,
Luke Johnson, Lyman E. Johnson and William E. McLellin, who had inquired
concerning themselves. In addition to the advice and commandments given to
these men there was much counsel and commandment for the inhabitants in
Zion, for there were idlers among them, the Lord declared, and they were
to keep the Sabbath day, to remember their prayers, to teach their
children the principles of the Gospel and have them baptized when eight
years old, for these things they were failing to do; therefore the Lord
was not pleased with them. Instructions were also given regarding the
Priesthood and its powers, for the guidance of the Church. This
information Oliver Cowdery was to carry on his return to Zion.
On the 3rd of November, the Lord gave the great
revelation known as the Appendix, to the Book of Commandments, which
appears as Section 133 in the book of Doctrine and Covenants.
Arrangement of the Revelations
It was decided that Oliver Cowdery should carry the
revelations to Missouri, where they should be printed. Joseph Smith was
therefore kept busy during the days intervening, as Oliver expected to
leave about the 15th of November. The Prophet writes: “My time was
occupied closely in reviewing the commandments and sitting in conference,
for nearly two weeks; for from the first to the twelfth of November, we
held four special conferences.”
Worth of the Revelations
At the last of these conferences, held in Hiram, at the
home of John Johnson, the members voted, after deliberate consideration of
the revelations, “that they prize the revelations to be worth to the
Church the riches of the whole earth, speaking temporally.” The benefits
to the Church and to the world, which come from the Book of Mormon and the
revelations to Joseph Smith, were also considered, and the expression of
the conference was to the effect that the infinite wisdom of the Lord, in
granting for their salvation and the salvation of the world, these sacred
things, should be fully appreciated.
Commandments Dedicated
It was voted that Joseph Smith be appointed to dedicate
and consecrate these brethren, Oliver Cowdery and John Whitmer, and the
sacred writings entrusted to their care, to the Lord. Moreover, it was
also voted that, in consequence of the diligence of Joseph Smith, Oliver
Cowdery, John Whitmer and Sidney Rigdon, “in bringing to light, by the
grace of God, these sacred things, they be appointed to manage them
according to the laws of the Church, and that their families as well as
the families of Hyrum Smith, Christian Whitmer, Peter Whitmer, Jacob
Whitmer, Hiram Page and David Whitmer, also Samuel Smith, William Smith
and Don Carlos Smith, be remembered to the bishop of Zion as worthy of
inheritances in the land of Zion.” In accord with this motion regarding
the dedication of the revelations and those who should carry them, this
action was taken at this time by Joseph Smith. Shortly after this
conference, Oliver Cowdery and John Whitmer departed on their journey.
Labors Among the Enemy
On the 1st of December, Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon
were commanded to take “a mission for a season” and call upon the
inhabitants of the earth, and, said the Lord, “confound your enemies; call
upon them to meet you, both in public and in private; and inasmuch as ye
are faithful, their shame shall be made manifest. Wherefore let them bring
forth their strong reason against the Lord.” The reason for this
commandment was due to the activities of the apostate Ezra Booth, who was
publishing in Ravenna, Ohio, many falsehoods against the Church. According
to this call Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon left on the 3rd of December
for Kirtland, to fulfil this revelation. For some time they spoke in
Kirtland, Shalersville, Ravenna, and other places, vindicating the cause
and confounding their enemies. They were blessed with the Spirit of the
Lord, and witnessed the fulfilment of the promises made to them; for they
were able to allay much of the excitement and change false impressions
which had grown out of scandalous articles in the
“Ohio Star” at Ravenna.
The Amherst Conference
On the 15th day of January, 1832, a conference was held
at Amherst, Loraine County, Ohio. At this conference much business was
transacted in harmony and in the spirit of fellowship. Joseph Smith was
sustained as President of the High Priesthood. The revelation known as
Section 75 in the Doctrine and Covenants was also given in which a number
of elders were called to take missions, two by two, in several directions
throughout the land.
The Vision of the Glories
At the close of this conference, Joseph Smith and Sidney
Rigdon again took up their work of revising the scriptures. While doing
so, “it appeared self-evident,” they declared, “from what truths were
left, that if God rewarded every one according to the deeds done in the
body, the term ‘Heaven’ is intended for the Saints’ eternal home, must
include more kingdoms than one.” Accordingly on the 16th of February,
1832, while revising St. John’s Gospel, and in answer to their prayer,
they saw the heavens opened and beheld the Father and the Son. The account
of this vision, as it is given in Section 76 of the Doctrine and
Covenants, is one of the choicest bits of literature, and one of the
greatest revelations ever given to man. It throws a flood of light upon
eternity and the destiny of the human race and teaches the mercy of a
loving Father, who saves all the workmanship of his hands, save it be the
sons of perdition, who sin against the light and crucify their Redeemer
again unto themselves. That every man shall be rewarded according to his
works, and that a place has been prepared for each individual somewhere in
the mansion of the Father, after he is purged from sin, is a glorious and
merciful provision in the plan of salvation, which this vision declares,
as it was provided before the world began. It would be folly to attempt to
comment on this most wonderful revelation of the power and loving kindness
of the Lord, which the words of man cannot adequately express.
The Prophet’s Views on the Vision
The words of Joseph Smith pertaining to this opening of
the heavens, are well expressed. “Nothing,” he has written, “could be more
pleasing to the Saints upon the order of the kingdom of the Lord, than the
light which burst upon the world through the foregoing vision. Every law,
every commandment, every promise, every truth, and every point touching
the destiny of man, from Genesis to Revelation, where the purity of the
scriptures remains unsullied by the folly of men, go to show the
perfection of the theory [of different degrees of glory in the future
life] and witness the fact that that document is a transcript from the
records of the eternal world. The sublimity of the ideas; the purity of
the language; the scope for action; the continued duration for completion,
in order that the heirs of salvation may confess the Lord and bow the
knee; the rewards for faithfulness, and the punishments for sins, are so
much beyond the narrow-mindedness of men, that every honest man is
constrained to exclaim: “It came from God!” Joseph Smith or any other man
guided by the inspiration of man’s power could not have written it.
Mob Violence in Hiram
Before going to Hiram, Ohio, to live, Joseph Smith and
his wife adopted two children (twins) of Elder John Murdock’s. Their
mother died at their birth, and Emma Smith, having lost twins of her own
which were born the same day, took the Murdock twins to raise. In March,
1832, when these children were about eleven months old, they took the
measles, and their care caused both the Prophet and his wife to lose much
rest. On the night of the 24th, after the family had retired, a mob
surrounded the house, broke open the door and dragged the Prophet into the
open. On the way he managed to get one foot loose with which he kicked one
of the ruffians and knocked him down. At this, with blasphemous oath, the
fiends swore they would kill the Prophet if he made further resistance.
They then choked him until he was unconscious. When he came too, he
discovered Sidney Rigdon, whom they had also taken from his home and
dragged by his heels so that his head struck at every step on the frozen
earth. He was unconscious on the ground. About sixty rods from the house
the mob held a council to decide what further action they might take. Some
were ready to kill the Prophet, but returning to him they attempted to
force a vial of acid in his mouth, but the vial was broken against his
teeth. An attempt was also made to fill his mouth with tar; failing in
this they tore from him his clothes, and applied the tar with feathers to
his body. After shamefully beating him they left him helpless on the
ground. Joseph attempted to rise, but fell to the ground again. After a
while he began to recover his strength, and made his way with difficulty
to his home.
Sidney received similar treatment, which left him
delirious for several days. The Prophet’s friends spent the night cleaning
the tar from his body, and the following day, it being the Sabbath, he met
with the people at the regular hour, and addressed them. Several of the
members of the mob were present, including Simonds Ryder, an apostate, and
leader of the mob; a Mr. McClentic and Felatiah Allen, who had provided
the mob with a barrel of whisky to raise their spirits and make them
“brave” to do the deed. During the mobbing one of the twins became
exposed, contracted a severe cold, and a few days later, died.
Second Visit to Missouri
The first of April, Joseph Smith, with Newel K. Whitney
and Jesse Gause, left for Missouri to fulfil the provisions of a
revelation (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 78) in respect to regulating and
establishing the affairs of the store house for the poor, and the
consecration of properties. They were later joined by Sidney Rigdon. On
the way they purchased paper, at Wheeling, Virginia, for the press in
Zion, and arrived in Independence on the 24th of April. Two days later at
a general council of the Church, Joseph Smith was acknowledged by the
Saints in Zion as President of the High Priesthood, ratifying the action
of the Amherst conference, held January 25, 1832.
Zion and Her Stakes
During this conference a revelation was given commanding
the elders to bind themselves in a covenant of consecration, which could
not be broken. Kirtland was to become a “stake of Zion.”1
“For I have consecrated the land of Shinehah (Kirtland), in mine own due
time,” said the Lord, “for the benefit of the Saints of the Most High, and
for a stake of Zion. For Zion must increase in beauty, and in holiness;
her borders must be enlarged; her stakes must be strengthened; yea, verily
I say unto you, Zion must arise and put on her beautiful garments.
Therefore I give unto you this commandment, that ye bind yourselves by
this covenant, and it shall be done according to the laws of the Lord.”
Return to Kirtland
Joseph and the brethren visited the Colesville Saints in
Kaw township, who rejoiced greatly to see them. It was agreed in a council
held on the first of May to print but three thousand copies of the Book of
Commandments, and that the revelations should be reviewed and prepared by
Oliver Cowdery, William W. Phelps and John Whitmer; and that the hymns
selected by Emma Smith be prepared for printing. After the transaction of
other necessary business, Joseph Smith and his companions, Rigdon and
Whitney, returned to Kirtland. On this journey Joseph was poisoned and
Bishop Whitney met with an accident breaking his leg and foot in several
places; both were healed by the power of the Lord.
Notes
1. The term “Stake of Zion,” which was first used
in a revelation given in November, 1831 (Sec. 68) is a comparison to the
stakes which bind a tent. Isaiah says: “Look upon Zion, the city of our
solemnities; thine eyes shall see Jerusalem a quiet habitation, a
tabernacle that shall not be taken down; not one of the stakes thereof
shall ever be removed, neither shall any of the cords thereof be broken”
(Ch. 33:20). Again: “Enlarge the place of thy tent and let them stretch
forth the curtains” of thine habitations: spare not, lengthen thy cords,
and strengthen thy stakes.” (Ch. 54:2)
Zion is the tent, the settlements surrounding her, are
the cords and stakes. It is as improper to speak of Zion in Missouri as
the “center stake of Zion,” as it would be to call a tent a stake.
Chapter 18
Revelations
Important Revelations
In the fall of 1832 and continuing through the winter
and spring of 1833, a number of remarkable revelations were given for the
edification and guidance of the Church. Great principles of science and
philosophy, as well as of doctrine and spiritual truth, were revealed.
On the 22nd and 23rd of September, at the inquiry of a
number of elders of the Church, the history and power of the Priesthood
were revealed (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 84); the responsibilities taken by those
who are ordained, were explained; the promises made to those who are
faithful that they shall receive the fulness of the blessings of the
father’s kingdom—for he had declared it “with an oath and covenant,
which belongeth to the Priesthood,” with the penalty attached that “whoso
breaketh this covenant . . . and altogether turneth therefrom,
shall not have forgiveness of sins in this world, nor in the word to come”
—were clearly defined; the place of the great temple, and when it
shall be built, and many other things dealing with the gathering of the
Saints, the building of Zion and its redemption, were set forth.
November 27 the Lord stated that he would send one
mighty and strong to arrange the inheritances of the Saints in Zion (Doc.
and Cov. Sec. 85). December 6, the parable of the wheat and the tares was
explained (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 86). On Christmas day the prophecy on war,
which has so far been fulfilled, was given (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 87). Two
days later the remarkable revelation on scientific and doctrinal truth,
known as the “Olive Leaf” (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 88), was presented to the
Church. In this wonderful communication from the heavens, the following
eternal principles, among many others, were revealed:
The light of Christ is the light of truth and is the
light of the sun, the planets, the stars, and the power by which they were
made; it is the light which quickeneth the intelligence of man; it is the
life and light of all things, and is the law by which they are governed;
it fills the immensity of space; to every kingdom there is given laws
which have their bounds and conditions; there is no space in which there
is no kingdom, great or small; the worlds in space are peopled with the
children of our Father; the earth on which we dwell is a living body and
shall die, but shall be raised again a celestial body and shall become the
abode of celestial beings; the inhabitants of the earth who are unfaithful
must inherit another kingdom in eternity; he who cannot abide the law of
the celestial kingdom, cannot abide a celestial glory; every man in the
resurrection is quickened by the glory of the kingdom to which he has
attained: the spirit and the body is the soul of man, and the redemption
of the soul is through the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ; after
the testimonies of the elders will come the testimonies of judgments; the
order of the signs preceding the coming of the Savior, are made known; the
redemption of the just; the destruction of the “great and abominable
church;” and the fate of the wicked, are declared among the great truths
contained in this revelation.
In February, 1833, the Lord gave to Joseph Smith the
“Word of Wisdom” (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 89), for the temporal salvation of
mankind. March 15, 1833, the doctrines of the eternity of matter; the
glory of God is Intelligence; the innocence of man in the beginning; and
many other things were received (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 93).
The School of the Prophets
In the revelation of December 27, 1833 (Doc. and Cov.
Sec. 88), the elders of the Church were also commanded to “teach one
another the doctrines of the kingdom.” They were to be instructed “more
perfectly in theory, in principle, in doctrine, in the law of the Gospel,
in all things that pertain unto the kingdom of God,” that were expedient
for them to understand. They were to tarry in Kirtland for this
instruction, before they should “go forth, among the Gentiles for the last
time, as many as the mouth of the Lord shall name, to bind up the law and
seal up the testimony, and to prepare the Saints for the hour of judgment
which is to come.” They were to seek diligently out of the best books,
words of wisdom and learning “even by study and also by faith.” That this
should be accomplished, they were to prepare a house of prayer, learning
and faith, even a house of glory—a house of God. In it they were to
call their solemn assemblies; one should be appointed as teacher, and not
all speak at once. While one speaks, all others should give attention. In
this manner there was to be perfect order in the School of the Prophets
—for so it should be called. Moreover, the Lord declared: “And this
shall be the order of the house of the presidency of the school: He that
is appointed to be president, or teacher, shall be found standing in his
place, in the house which shall be prepared for him. Therefore, he shall
be first in the house of God, in a place that the congregation in the
house may hear his words carefully and distinctly, not with loud speech.”
Those who were entitled to attend should be the officers of the Church who
are called to the ministry, “beginning at the high priests, even down to
the deacons.” They were to greet each other in fellowship, with proper
salutations. They should be men who were clean from the blood of this
generation, sober-minded and full of faith. Further, the Lord stated: “And
ye are called to do this by prayer and thanksgiving as the Spirit shall
give utterance in all your doings in the house of the Lord, in the School
of the Prophets, that it may become a sanctuary, a tabernacle of the Holy
Spirit to your edification.”
The Coming of Brigham Young and Others
September 10, George Albert Smith, son of John Smith and
cousin to the Prophet, was baptized in Potsdam, New York. He was a youth
fifteen years of age, who in later years was to play an important part in
the work of these latter days. About the 8th of November, Joseph Young,
Brigham Young, Heber C. Kimball and John P. Greene, came from Mendon,
Monroe County, New York. This was the first meeting of Joseph Smith and
these brethren. They remained in Kirtland for a number of days and were
privileged to meet with the Prophet on several occasions. In one of their
meetings, Brigham Young and John P. Greene spoke in tongues, as did also
the Prophet Joseph Smith. These brethren had received the Gospel in
Mendon. It had first been brought to their attention in the summer or fall
of 1831, through the labors of Samuel H. Smith, who had left a copy of the
Book of Mormon with John P. Greene. Later, through the preaching of Elders
Alpheus Gifford, Elial Strong and others they were persuaded to receive
the truth. Brigham Young was baptized by Elder Eleazer Miller, April 14,
1832; was ordained an elder and at once entered the ministry and assisted
in raising up several branches in the vicinity of Mendon, New York.
The Prophet’s Labors in Kirtland
The winter of 1832–3 was spent by Joseph Smith in
revision of the scriptures; in the School of the Prophets, which had just
been organized by commandment (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 88); and in the holding
of conferences from time to time. In January a number of meetings of the
elders were held, in which the ordinances of washing of feet, as spoken of
in the 13th chapter of John, was attended to, as commanded by the Lord
(Doc. and Cov. Sec. 88). On the 2nd of February the Prophet finished the
revision of the New Testament, as far as he was directed to revise it at
that time, and sealed it up not to be opened until it arrived in Zion.
Several epistles were written to the Saints, and much correspondence
passed between the elders in Zion and those in Kirtland in relation to
their work.
Organization of the First Presidency
March 18, 1833, the First Presidency of the Church was
organized, with Joseph Smith, president, and Sidney Rigdon and Frederick
G. Williams, counselors. This was in fulfilment of the commandment given
in a revelation (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 90) on the 8th of that month, wherein
the Lord said to Joseph Smith: “And again, verily I say unto thy brethren,
Sidney Rigdon and Frederick G. Williams, their sins are forgiven them
also, and they are accounted as equal with thee in holding the keys of the
kingdom.” One year before, in March, 1832, the Lord had called Frederick
G. Williams to this position by revelation (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 81), and to
hold “the keys of the kingdom, which belongeth always unto the Presidency
of the High Priesthood.” Joseph Smith laid his hands on the heads of each
of these men and ordained them to take part with him in this great
responsibility. Thus another step in the organization of the Church was
completed.
Kirtland a Stake of Zion
March 23, 1833, a council of the elders was called for
the purpose of appointing a committee to purchase lands in Kirtland, upon
which the Saints might build a stake of Zion. After some deliberations a
committee was appointed consisting of Ezra Thayer and Joseph Coe. Later
the property was purchased for this purpose, and many of the elders
commenced to labor in various ways for the building of a city for the
Saints at Kirtland.
First Gathering of the Mob in Zion
In April, 1833, the first gathering of the mob in
Jackson County took place. About three hundred men came together to decide
upon a plan of campaign for the removal of the members of the Church in
Jackson County. At the same time the elders in Jackson County met in
solemn prayer and petitioned the Lord that the efforts of their enemies
might fail. They had reason to meet and pray, for the wickedness of their
enemies was extreme. Nor were the Saints free from guilt before the Lord.
They had failed to keep strictly the commandments of the Lord which had
been given them for the building up of Zion. Jealousies had arisen and
murmurings were heard; even the Prophet, as well as others of the leading
brethren, had been criticized. Some of the members had failed to observe
the law of consecration, which had been given for the building of Zion,
and their humility, in some respects, had been forgotten. However, on this
occasion the deliberations of their enemies came to nothing. The Lord had
heard the prayers of the Saints.
A House of the Lord in Kirtland
At a conference of high priests held May 4, 1833, a
committee was appointed to obtain subscriptions for the building of a
house for a school, in compliance with the revelations of December 27,
1832, and March 8, 1833, where the elders might receive instructions
before going out to warn the world. Hyrum Smith, Jared Carter and Reynolds
Cahoon, were appointed as that committee. May 6, Joseph Smith received
another revelation in which the Church was commanded to “commence a work
of laying out and preparing a beginning and foundation of a stake of
Zion,” in Kirtland. A house was also to be built for the work of printing,
translating, and “all things whatsoever the Lord should command them.” The
committee immediately went to work to gather means by subscriptions for
this purpose. They had previously been commanded to build a house unto the
Lord, to be a house of prayer and fasting, to be a temple unto His name.
Commencement of the Kirtland Temple
By the first of June the preparations for the building
of the Kirtland Temple were under way. A circular letter was sent out by
the building committee to the various branches of the Church. June 1, the
Prophet received the word of the Lord, in relation to the building of the
temple, in which the Saints were commanded to hasten the work, and the
necessity for such a building was made known. “Ye have sinned against me a
very grievous sin, in that ye have not considered the great commandment in
all things, that I have given unto you concerning the building of mine
house,” said the Lord. Then He states the reason, in part—for the
full purpose for such a house was not at that time made known—to be
as follows: “For the preparation wherewith I design to prepare mine
apostles to prune my vineyard for the last time, that I may bring to pass
my strange act, that I may pour out my Spirit upon all flesh. . .
. Yea, verily I say unto you, I give you a commandment that you
should build an house, in the which I design to endow those whom I have
chosen, with power from on high. For this is the promise of the Father
unto you, therefore I command you to tarry, even as mine apostles at
Jerusalem.”
From this it is discovered that there were certain
endowments and blessings to be given to the elders, before they could go
forth fully prepared to preach the Gospel in the world, which could only
be obtained in the temple of the Lord. For this cause the Lord commanded
that the temple be built at once, for the preaching of the Gospel was
urgent, and the laborers were few. The Saints therefore, went to work
diligently in the midst of many difficulties, both within, as well as
without, the Church, to build the house of the Lord.
The First Work on the Temple
On the 5th of June, George A. Smith hauled the first
load of stone, and Hyrum Smith and Reynolds Cahoon, two of the building
committee, commenced to dig the trench for the foundation, which they
later finished with their own hands. Others also volunteered, and by these
means the work progressed.
The Case of “Doctor” Hurlbut
On the 3rd of June a charge was preferred against
Philastus Hurlbut, who was accused of unchristian conduct while on a
mission to the east. On investigation his elder’s licence was taken from
him. On the 21st he appealed his case and on making confession of his
improper conduct and a seeming show of repentance, he was reinstated. Two
days later, however, his sincerity was called in question, and on the
testimony of witnesses who had heard him say that he had not repented and
had deceived “Joseph Smith’s God,” he was excommunicated from the Church.
He later manifested a bitter spirit and in April, 1834, was bound by the
court to keep the peace, “with good and sufficient security in the sum of
two hundred dollars,” for threats against the life of Joseph Smith.1
Notes
1. Any reference to “Dr.” Hurlbut might be
considered insignificant but for one thing which developed after his
apostasy and excommunication, which may be mentioned briefly here. He was
not a doctor, but was so called because he was the seventh son. He had
been a Methodist, but had been expelled from that body for immoral
conduct, before he joined the Church. While engaged in missionary work in
Pennsylvania he heard of a manuscript that had been written by one Solomon
Spaulding, which dealt with the subject of the American Indian. Hurlbut
had an evil thought. If he could make it appear that the Book of Mormon
was taken, or plagiarized, from the Spaulding Manuscript, it would prove
to be an irreparable injury to “Mormonism.” Others became interested in
the scheme and a book was produced by E. D. Howe, entitled Mormonism Unveiled. Of course the Spaulding story was lost
so that no comparison was possible. For many years the publication of E.
D. Howe was made to do mighty service against the Book of Mormon. As
time went on, however, the manuscript of Mr. Spaulding was found, and, is
now in the archives of Oberlin College, in Ohio. A comparison with the
Book of Mormon proved that the two productions were no more alike than the
Bible is like the story of Gulliver’s Travels. Since that day the
Hurlbut-Howe theory of the origin of the Book of Mormon has been dead.
For a thorough account of this question the reader is
referred to The Myth of the Manuscript Found, by
Elder George Reynolds; and New Witness for God,
vol. 3, page 354, by Elder B. H. Roberts.
Chapter 19
The Prophet’s Warning
The impending storm about to break over the heads of the
Saints in Missouri was foreseen by the Prophet Joseph Smith. In January,
1833, he wrote to William W. Phelps as follows: “The Lord will have a
place whence his word will go forth in these last days in purity; for if
Zion will not purify herself so as to be approved of in all things in his
sight, he will seek another people; for his work will go on until Israel
is gathered, and they who will not hear his voice must expect to feel his
wrath. . . . Our hearts are greatly grieved at the spirit
which is breathed both in your letter and that of Brother Gilbert’s, the
very spirit which is wasting the strength of Zion like a pestilence; and
if it is not detected and driven from you, it will ripen Zion for the
threatened judgments of God. . . . This from your brother
who trembles for Zion, and for the wrath of heaven, which awaits her if
she repent not.” These fears were also expressed in an epistle written the
same day from a conference of high priests in Kirtland to their brethren
in Zion. “We feel more like weeping for Zion than we do like rejoicing
over her, for we know that the judgments of God hang over her, and will
fall upon her except she repent,” was their message.
Rise of Mob Force in Jackson
Almost as soon as the members of the Church commenced
settling in Jackson County, opposition began to show itself. The settlers
were incited to violence by their ministers, who started a campaign of
abuse and falsehood. They received ready aid from others of the citizens,
which ultimately resulted in the expulsion of the Latter-day Saints from
the state. The Rev. Finis Ewing publicly distributed the report that “the
‘Mormons’ were the common enemies of mankind,” while the Rev. Pixley
circulated falsehoods among the religious papers of the east, and used his
influence among both the Indians and the whites for the destruction of the
Church in Jackson County.
Nearly all the Latter-day Saints were from the Eastern
States, while the Missourians were from the South. The Missourians feared
that the “Mormons” would increase and take from them their political
domination. The question of slavery, even in that day, was quite keen, and
the Missourians were determined to keep the state within the control of
the slave holders. Above all else, however, was their extreme hatred for
the “Mormons” because of their industry and belief. Some of the latter had
also failed to show the proper discretion and wisdom, for they openly
stated that the Lord had given them the land for their eternal
inheritance, and although they were to purchase the lands, yet in time
there the city Zion would be built, unto which none but the faithful would
be privileged to come. Such expressions aroused the Missourians to fever
heat, for they naturally hated the doctrines of the Church, and to be
informed that the lands would ultimately be taken from them, was adding
fuel to the flame.
As early as the spring of 1832, the mob resorted to
violence. In the still hours of the night, windows in many of the houses
of the Saints were broken, and other damage done by their enemies, who
naturally performed their deeds in the dark; but this was only the
beginning of sorrow.
The Mob Council
July 20, 1833, a council of all Missourians who were
opposed to the Latter-day Saints was called to meet in the Independence
Court house. Between four and five hundred men assembled and chose Richard
Simpson, chairman, and Samuel D. Lucas and J. H. Flournoy,
secretaries. They then proceeded to discuss means for the ejection of the
members of the Church from Jackson County, “peaceably if we can,” they
said, “forcibly if we must.” After deliberating for some time, they
concluded that “the arm of the civil law does not afford a guarantee,” or
at least a sufficient one, against the “evils” which were inflicted upon
them. These “evils” were such that “no one could have foreseen,” and
“therefore, unprovided for by the laws;” and the “delays incident to
legislation would put the mischief beyond remedy.” They must because of
this take into their own hands the matter of expulsion of hundreds of
citizens from their homes.
Some of the “evils” of the “Mormons” were stated to be
as follows: The declaration that miracles have been performed and
supernatural cures achieved among the sick; a belief in heavenly
manifestations and that they have held converse with God and his angels;
possession and exercise of the gifts of divination and unknown tongues;
and “fired with the prospect of obtaining inheritance without money and
without price.” Yet they were well aware that the “Mormons” had never made
the attempt to obtain lands except by purchase, as the Lord had commanded
them. Nevertheless all these “crimes” must be punished; for against such
evils “self preservation, good society and public morals,” made demands
that the “Mormons” should be expelled. The following articles were drawn
up and unanimously approved, to be submitted to the elders of the Church.
Declaration of the Mob
(1). “That no Mormon shall in future move and settle in
this county.
(2). “That those now here, who shall give a definite
pledge of their intention within reasonable time to remove out of the
county, shall be allowed to remain unmolested until they have sufficient
time to sell their property, and close their business, without any
material sacrifice.
(3). “That the editor of the Star
be required forthwith to close his office and discontinue the
business of printing in this county; and as to all other stores and shops
belonging to the sect, their owners must in every case strictly comply
with the terms of the second article of this declaration; and upon
failure, prompt and efficient measures will be taken to close the same.
(4). “That the Mormon leaders here are required to use
their influence in preventing any further emigration of their distant
brethren to this county, and to counsel and advise their brethren here to
comply with the above requisitions.
(5). “That those who fail to comply with these
requisitions be referred to those of their brethren who have the gifts of
divination, and of unknown tongues, to inform them of the lot that awaits
them.”
This address was read and after approval a committee
consisting of twelve men was appointed to wait upon the presiding elders
of the Church. They were instructed to “see that the foregoing
requisitions are strictly complied with by them; and upon their refusal,
that said committee do, as the organ of this county, inform them that it
is our unwavering purpose and fixed determination, after the fullest
consideration of all the consequences and responsibilities under which we
act, to use such means as shall insure full and complete adoption.” Such
was the ungodly manifesto of the mob.
The Enemy’s Demands
A recess was taken for two hours in which the committee
was to carry this message of unrighteous demands to the elders of the
Church, and then make report. Naturally these brethren desired time to
consider these drastic terms. They had come into the land by command of
the Lord, to receive their inheritance; it was here the great city of the
New Jerusalem was to be built; they had hoped for a peaceful possession of
their property, and as they had not interfered with the privileges of
others they justly felt that they were entitled to maintain their rights.
They asked for three months for consideration of these evil terms; but
were denied. They then asked for ten days; but were informed that fifteen
minutes was time enough. If immediate answer was not forthcoming an
unfavorable report would be returned, with consequences of serious
character speedily to follow. A refusal of these demands was evidently the
desire of the unlawful gathering at the court house, which sought a
pretext to vent their anger upon the Saints violently.
The Committee’s Report
The committee returned and made their report.
“Whereupon,” their minutes read, “it was unanimously resolved by the
meeting, that the Star printing office should be
razed to the ground; the type and press secured.” With the understanding
that they would meet again three days later, the horde of wretches started
forth on their mission of destruction. They did not overlook the
opportunity to advertise their deliberations “that the Mormon brethren may
know at a distance that the gates of Zion are closed against them—
that their interests will be best promoted by remaining among those who
know and appreciate their merits.”
Vengeance of the Mob
With the utmost fury these human fiends proceeded to the
office of the Evening and Morning Star and razed
it to the ground. The office was a part of the dwelling occupied by
William W. Phelps. Mrs. Phelps and her children, including a sick infant,
were thrown out of doors amidst the furniture which was destroyed. They
then proceeded to the store of Gilbert, Whitney and Co., bent on further
destruction; but Elder Gilbert assuring them that the goods would be
packed by the 23rd of that month, and no more would be sold, they left him
and the store and turned their attention to personal violence. They took
Bishop Edward Partridge and Charles Allen, stripped them and applied a
coat of tar which had been mixed with acid which burned into their flesh,
and then coated them with feathers. Others of the brethren were scourged,
amidst horrid yells and blasphemous oaths, while others in the excitement,
for all their captors were intent upon the “sport,” were able to make
their escape from similar treatment by the mob.
Second Gathering of the Mob
On the morning of July 23, 1833, the mob, to the number
of about five hundred, again approached Independence, carrying a red flag
—the emblem of lawlessness—and armed with all manner of
weapons of war. They rode through the streets, giving vent to hideous
yells and blasphemous oaths, searching for the presiding elders of the
Church. They threatened to whip any “Mormon” whom they captured, with from
fifty to five hundred lashes each, demolish their dwellings, and turn
negroes loose to destroy their fields.
Offer of Ransom for the Church
Elders John Corrill, John Whitmer, William W. Phelps,
Algernon S. Gilbert, Edward Partridge and Isaac Morley, the leading
elders, made no resistance, but offered themselves a ransom for the
Church. They were willing to be scourged and even die, if that would
appease the wrath of the mob. The Missourians, with blasphemous oaths,
assured them that every man, woman and child would be whipped and scourged
even to death if they did not leave Jackson County. “The Mormons,” said
the mobbers, “must leave the county, or they or the Mormons must die.” The
brethren mentioned, knowing that resistance was useless and to save the
Saints and avoid the shedding of blood, entered into an agreement with the
mob to leave the county within a reasonable time.
The Forced Agreement of the Mob
The terms forced by the mob upon the Saints were as
follows: Oliver Cowdery, William W. Phelps, William E. McLellin, Edward
Partridge, Lyman Wight, Simeon Carter, Harvey Whitlock and the two
Whitmers, Peter and John, were to remove their families from the county on
or before the first day of January, 1834; they were to use all their
influence to induce all other members of the Church to remove as soon as
possible, one half by January first, and the rest by the first of April
following; and to do all in their power to stop others of their brethren
from moving into Jackson County; John Corrill and Algernon S. Gilbert were
allowed to remain as general agents to wind up the business, Gilbert to
sell the merchandise on hand but to buy no more; the
Star was not to be published nor a press set up; Edward Partridge and
William W. Phelps were to remove their families, but they would be
permitted to come and go to wind up the affairs of the Church. The mob
pledged themselves to use no violence so long as the brethren complied
with the terms presented. To this the names of the elders and the members
of the second committee appointed by the mob were subscribed.
The Contract Broken by the Mob
Since there is no honor among knaves, the mob failed to
keep their agreement. Constantly they sallied forth, breaking windows in
the homes of the members of the Church and offering abuse when occasion
afforded. These attacks, however, did not pass unnoticed by the better
class of citizens in the state. The Western Monitor
, a paper published in Fayette, Missouri, first showed a friendly
spirit toward the mob, but later censured them for their conduct and
advised the “Mormons” to seek redress for their wrongs. Other papers
adopted a similar view, whereupon the members of the mob declared that if
any “Mormon” attempted “to seek redress by law or otherwise, for
character, person, or property, they should die.”
Appeal to Governor Dunklin
When hostilities broke out the brethren in Missouri sent
Oliver Cowdery to Kirtland to make report and consult the First Presidency
in respect to future action. In sorrow for the afflicted members in
Missouri the presidency sent Orson Hyde and John Gould with instructions
for their brethren in that land. Shortly after their arrival, necessary
preparations having been made, Elders William W. Phelps and Orson Hyde,
were sent to Jefferson City with a petition, under date of September 28,
1833, to Governor Daniel Dunklin. In their petition the wrongs of the
Latter-day Saints were clearly set forth, and it was signed by nearly all
the members of the Church in Missouri.
The Governor’s Reply
On the 19th of October, Governor Dunklin made reply to
the memorial of the members of the Church and advised them to take their
grievances before the courts, for, said he: “No citizen, nor number of
citizens, have a right to take the redress of their grievances, whether
real or imaginary, into their own hands. Such conduct strikes at the very
existence of society, and subverts the foundation on which it is based.
. . . The judge of your circuit is a conservator of the
peace: if an affidavit is made before him by any of you, that your lives
are threatened, and you believe them in danger, it would be his duty to
have the offenders apprehended, and bind them to keep the peace.” He could
not “permit himself to doubt that the courts were open to” the Saints.
Futility of the Advice
Under ordinary circumstances the governor’s advice might
have been of some worth. The conditions, however, were of no ordinary
nature. The leaders of the mob were Samuel D. Lucas, judge of the county
court; Samuel C. Owens, county clerk; John Smith, justice of the peace;
Samuel Weston, justice of the peace; William Brown, constable; Thomas
Pitcher, deputy constable; James H. Flournoy, postmaster, and Lilburn W.
Boggs, lieutenant governor of the state, the latter, however, keeping in
the background and aiding and abetting the others in their evil work. For
the “Mormon” people to accept the governor’s advice, would mean their
trial would be conducted before their avowed and open enemies, if they
were permitted a trial at all.
Counsel Employed by the Saints
Nevertheless, accepting the governor’s advice, attorneys
were engaged to fight the case. They were William T. Wood, Amos Reese,
Alexander W. Doniphan and David R. Atchison, who agreed to plant suits and
carry them through for one thousand dollars. Notes for that amount were
given by William W. Phelps and Bishop Partridge and endorsed by Gilbert,
Whitney and Co. However, very little benefit was ever derived by the
members of the Church, from this action.
Continued Activities of the Mob
As soon as it was known that the “Mormons” would appeal
to the courts, the mobbers began to prepare for war. On the night of
October 31, a band of about fifty marauders proceeded against a branch of
the Church west of the Big Blue River, not far from Independence. There
they unroofed and partly demolished a number of houses, whipped in a
savage manner several men and frightened the women and children, who were
forced to flee for safety. On the first of November, another attack was
made on a branch on the prairie, fourteen miles from Independence. The
same night another party raided the homes of the Saints in Independence,
where a number of houses were demolished and the goods in the store of
Gilbert, Whitney and Co., were scattered in the street. One Richard
McCarty was caught in the act of breaking into the store and demolishing
property and was taken before Samuel Weston, justice of the peace, where a
complaint was made against him; Judge Weston, however, refused to consider
the complaint, and turned McCarty loose. The next day McCarty caused the
arrest of the witnesses who had captured him in this unlawful act, and had
them tried for false imprisonment. The same justice, on the testimony of
this fellow alone, found the witnesses, Gilbert, Morley and Corrill,
guilty and committed them to jail. “Although we could not obtain a warrant
against him for breaking open the store,” said John Corrill, “yet he had
gotten one for us for catching him at it.”
The Battle of the Blue
These attacks upon the Saints were repeatedly continued;
attempts were made to obtain peace warrants, but no justice would issue
them for fear of the mob. Monday, November 4, 1833, a band of mobbers
gathered at the Big Blue River and commenced to destroy property. Nineteen
men, members of the Church, gathered in defense, but discovering the
superior number of the mob, turned back. Their enemies, learning of this
attempt, immediately went in pursuit of the “Mormons” who fled in various
directions for safety. About thirty more of the brethren from the prairie
armed with seventeen guns approached and a battle commenced. The mobbers
soon fled leaving two of their number, Hugh L. Brazeale and Thomas
Linville, dead on the ground. Among the “Mormons” Andrew Barber received a
mortal wound and died the following day. Philo Dibble also received a
severe wound, but was almost instantly healed by the laying on of hands by
Elder Newel Knight.
The Mob Militia
Following the battle of the Blue, excitement ran high.
November 5, 1833, at the instigation of Lieutenant Governor Lilburn W.
Boggs, the militia was called out under command of Colonel Thomas Pitcher,
one of the leaders of the mob of July 23. It was stated that the militia
had been called for the protection of the Saints, but it had every
appearance of a mob and in its ranks were many of the most bitter enemies
of the Church. Colonel Pitcher demanded that the Saints surrender their
arms. This they refused to do unless their enemies should also be
disarmed. Colonel Pitcher readily agreed to this proposition to which
Lieutenant Governor Boggs also pledged his honor. Another demand was that
certain brethren who had been engaged in the battle the day before were to
be surrendered and tried for murder. Both of these demands were complied
with by the Saints.
Misplaced Confidence
Having confidence in the pledge of the lieutenant
governor, the Saints returned to their homes feeling somewhat secure from
further attacks. Their confidence, however, had been misplaced, for it was
a cunning scheme of this state official, and the other leaders of the mob,
to place the members of the Church in a defenseless position and then
drive them from the county; which, forthwith, they proceeded to do. The
arms were never taken from the members of the mob, but those taken from
the Saints were distributed among their enemies to be used against them.”
1
The following day gangs of men, numbering sixty or more, went
from house to house whipping the men, driving the women and children from
their homes at the muzzles of their guns, and setting fire to their
houses, to make sure their owners would not return. More than two hundred
houses were destroyed in the several raids of the mob. The men who
surrendered themselves under the charge of murder, were detained for one
day and a night and sorely abused; then they were taken out into a
cornfield by this same Colonel Pitcher and told to “clear!” meaning they
were to leave immediately for parts unknown.
The Saints in Exile
These attacks continued for several days and among those
directing the forces of the mob were several “reverend” gentlemen who took
pleasure in these wicked deeds. By the 7th of November, the banks of the
Missouri River were lined with refugees who had gathered in the utmost
confusion, so hasty had been their flight. Twelve hundred souls were thus
forced to seek shelter, the best they could, in the dead of winter, and in
the midst of storms. Many died from exposure and the abuse otherwise
heaped upon them and the fleeing multitude left, in the frozen stubble, a
trail of blood from their lacerated feet. The exiled Saints sought refuge
in the neighboring counties, but from some of these they were again forced
to flee before the inhospitable inhabitants among whom they found
themselves. In Clay County, just across the river north of Jackson, they
were received temporarily with some degree of kindness.
An Attempt to Seek Redress
Through their attorneys, and by direct petition to
Governor Daniel Dunklin, the Saints sought to repossess their property in
Jackson County. The governor acknowledged the justice of their claims and
expressed a willingness to furnish an “adequate force” to effect that
object; but he declared he had no power to protect them after they were
once returned to their lands. He was also willing, so it was declared by
Attorney General R. W. Wells, to organize them in companies of
militia that they might aid in their restoration. The Saints knew that
such a thing would only arouse their enemies to greater fury, and as no
protection was guaranteed them when once restored, such an offer could not
be accepted.
Farcical Effort to Enforce the Law
It may have been the intention of the state officials,
at the first, to restore the exiles to their lands, but they evidently
lacked the courage to cope with the lawless, but determined, enemies of
the Saints. A number of leading elders were subpoenaed in behalf of the
state to appear at the February (1834) term of court to be held at
Independence. On the 23rd of that month, under the protection of Captain
Atchison’s company of “Liberty Blues”—nearly fifty rank and file
—these witnesses crossed the Missouri River bound for Independence.
That night they camped in the woods. Captain Atchison, becoming alarmed at
the appearance of the enemy, sent an express to Colonel Allen for two
hundred drafted militia, and to Liberty for more ammunition. Early the
next morning this company marched to Independence, and after breakfast
they were visited by District Attorney Ames Reese and Attorney General R.
W. Wells, who informed the witnesses that all hopes of criminal
prosecution were at an end. Mr. Wells had been sent by the governor to
investigate the Jackson County outrages, but the bold front of the mob
evidently intimidated the state officials who were willing to appease the
wrath of the mob rather than to maintain the majesty of the law.
As soon as Captain Atchison was informed that his
services were no longer needed, he took his witnesses and marched them out
of town, to the tune of Yankee Doodle, quick time, and soon returned to
camp. One of the witnesses, Elder William W. Phelps, wrote of this
farcical proceeding as follows: “This order was issued by the court,
apparently on the speedy gathering of the old mob, or citizens of Jackson
County, and their assuming such a boisterous and mobocratic appearance.
Much credit is due to Captain Atchison for his gallantry and hospitality,
and I think I can say of the officers and company, that their conduct as
soldiers and men, is highly reputable; so much the more, knowing as I do,
the fatal results of the trial had the militia come or not come. .
. . Thus ended all hopes of redress, even with a guard ordered
by the governor for the protection of the court and witnesses.”
Notes
In the spring of 1834, Governor Dunklin issued a requisition to
Colonel S. D. Lucas to return the arms to the “Mormons” which were
taken from them in November, 1833; but Lucas had resigned his commission
and moved to Lexington, Missouri. A second requisition to Colonel Pitcher
was contemptuously ignored. The arms were distributed among the mob and
they boasted that they would not return them, notwithstanding the order of
the governor of the state; and the arms were never returned.
Chapter 20
The Patriarchal Priesthood
December 18, 1833, a number of elders assembled in the
printing office in Kirtland and dedicated the printing press, with all
that pertained thereunto, unto the service of the Lord. The first sheets
of the re-printed Evening and Morning Star were
struck off, it having been decided to continue that periodical in Kirtland
until the press could be restored in Independence.1 While the elders
were assembled in the printing office on this occasion the Prophet gave
the first patriarchal blessings in this dispensation. It was his privilege
to do this, for he held the keys of all the authority in the Church, and
was spoken of as the first patriarch in the Church because of this fact,
in the minutes which were kept at that time. Those who received blessings
under his hands on this occasion were: Oliver Cowdery, the father and
mother of the Prophet, and three of his brothers, Hyrum, Samuel and
William Smith. Oliver Cowdery, who held the keys of Priesthood with the
Prophet, also gave a number of patriarchal blessings. Joseph Smith, Sen.,
was ordained to the Patriarchal Priesthood, to hold the keys of blessing
on the heads of all the members of the Church, the Lord revealing that it
was his right to hold this authority. He was also set apart as an
assistant counselor to the Prophet Joseph in the presidency, and at a
later day Hyrum Smith, the Prophet’s brother, and John Smith, his uncle,
were set apart to this same calling.
Organization of the First High Council
The first high council in this dispensation was
organized at the home of Joseph Smith in Kirtland, February 17, 1834. The
First Presidency presided in this council and the following brethren were
chosen as its members: Joseph Smith, Sen., John Smith, Joseph Coe, John
Johnson, Martin Harris, John S. Carter, Jared Carter, Oliver Cowdery,
Samuel H. Smith, Orson Hyde, Sylvester Smith and Luke S. Johnson.2
Several days before this action was taken the Prophet had explained the
manner in which councils should be conducted. “No man,” said he, “is
capable of judging a matter in council unless his own heart is pure.”
Ancient councils were conducted with strict propriety; no one was
permitted to whisper, leave the room, or think of anything but the matter
before them for consideration. If the presiding officer could stay, others
were expected to do the same, until the Spirit was obtained and a
righteous decision was reached.
There were a number of cases awaiting the action of the
high council as soon as it was organized, and within a day or two several
trials were held and matters of discipline passed upon. One question
considered was as follows: “Whether disobedience to the word of wisdom was
a transgression sufficient to deprive an official member from holding
office in the Church, after having it sufficiently taught him?” After a
free and full discussion Joseph Smith, who presided, gave his decision as
follows: “No official member in this Church is worthy to hold an office
after having the word of wisdom properly taught him; and he, the official
member, neglecting to comply with or obey it.” This decision was confirmed
by unanimous vote.
Zion Shall Not be Removed
A revelation was given to Joseph Smith December 16,
1833, giving the reason for the expulsion of the members of the Church
from Jackson County (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 101). Nevertheless the Lord
declared that Zion should “not be moved out of her place, notwithstanding
her children are scattered.” In his own due time he would redeem Zion, and
let fall the sword of his indignation in behalf of his people. The cup of
his wrath was to be poured out without measure upon all nations, when the
cup of their iniquity is full. The Saints were instructed to “Importune
for redress and redemption” before the judge, and if he should fail, then
before the governor, and if they could not obtain redress from him they
were to importune the president of the United States, and if he heeded
them not, then the Lord would “vex the nation.” The Church was instructed
to purchase lands in Jackson and neighboring counties, for inheritances
for the Saints. Moreover, they were instructed in a parable to gather
together the strength of the Lord’s house, “My young men and they that are
middle aged also among all my servants, who are the strength of mine
house, save those only whom I have appointed to tarry,” said the Lord,
“and go straightway unto the land of my vineyard, and redeem my vineyard,
for it is mine, I have bought it with money.” February 24, 1834, the Lord
further declared that if his Saints would, from that time forth, repent
and keep his commandments, they should “begin to prevail” against his
enemies from that very hour; but if they polluted their inheritances they
were to be thrown down, for he would not spare them if they polluted their
inheritances. “The redemption of Zion must needs come by power,” he
declared, therefore the Saints were to collect money and purchase lands,
as they had been commanded, and the young and middle aged were to gather
to Zion and seek its redemption.
Zion’s Camp
According to this instruction, a call went forth asking
for volunteers to go to Zion. Five hundred men were wanted; yet, said the
Lord: “If you cannot obtain five hundred, seek diligently that
peradventure ye may obtain one hundred;” for with less than one hundred
they were not to go. The first of May (1834) a part of these volunteers
left Kirtland, and on the fifth Joseph Smith and the remainder took up
their journey. At West Portage, about fifty miles west of Kirtland, they
met and were organized in companies for the journey. Each company was
divided as follows: a captain, two cooks, two firemen, two tent-men, two
water-men, one runner, two wagoners and horsemen, and one commissary,
twelve men in all. Every night before retiring, at the sound of the bugle
they bowed before the Lord in prayer in their several tents, and every
morning, at the trumpet’s call about four o’clock, every man again knelt
in prayer, imploring the blessings of the Lord for the day. As they
traveled they endeavored to keep their identity unknown so as not to
arouse opposition in the country through which they passed. As it was they
were followed by enemies and spies, and delegations approached them from
time to time to learn the meaning of their journey. The following
questions were frequently put and answered in this manner:
“Where are you from?”
“From the East.”
“Where are you going?”
“To the West.”
“What for?”
“To see where we can get land cheapest and best.”
“Who leads the camp?”
“Sometimes one and sometimes another.”
Their journey took them through Dayton, Indianapolis,
Springfield and Jacksonville, Illinois, and across the Mississippi River
into Missouri. It was near the banks of the Illinois River, west of
Jacksonville, where the bones of Zelph3 the white Lamanite,
were dug up and mounds, or ancient altars, were discovered. This was about
the first of June, and on the third, while still camped on the banks of
the river refreshing themselves, the Prophet Joseph got up on a wagon and
uttered this prophecy: “I said the Lord had revealed to me that a scourge
would come upon the camp in consequence of the fractious and unruly
spirits that appeared among them, and they should die like sheep with the
rot; still, if they would repent and humble themselves before the Lord,
the scourge in great measure might be turned away; but as the Lord lives,
the members of this camp will suffer for giving way to their unruly
temper.” Even this warning did not prevent some of the members of the camp
from murmuring and finding fault against their brethren.
Message to Governor Dunklin
Acting on the commandment in the revelations the
brethren in Missouri did not cease to importune the judge and the governor
of the state, May 29, 1834, and again June 5, the Saints in Clay County
petitioned the governor, and on the 6th, he wrote to Colonel J. Thornton
acknowledging the just cause of the Saints in this demand made of him,
stating:
“Uncommitted as I am to either party, I shall feel no
embarrassment in doing my duty—though it may be done with the most
extreme regret. My duty in the relation which I now stand to the
parties, is plain and straight forward. . . . A more
clear and indisputable right does not exist than that of the Mormon
people, who were expelled from their homes in Jackson County, to return
and live on their lands; and if they cannot be persuaded, as a matter of
policy, to give up that right, or to qualify it, my course as the chief
executive of the State, is a plain one. The constitution of the United
States declares that, ‘The citizens of each state shall be entitled to
all the privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states.’”
He then suggested to Colonel Thornton, which proposition
he also presented to the Saints, that they sell out and move from their
possessions; or, to attempt to peaceably settle their difficulties, and he
would attempt to get the citizens to “rescind their illegal resolves”
against the “Mormons” and agree to conform to the laws. If all this should
fail, and they could not agree to divide their lands, then he would have
to conform his action to that end, indicating that in justice he would be
bound to assist the exiles to regain their property.
All such expressions led the members of the Church to
hope for redress. Acting on this thought, about the 8th of June, a
delegation from Zion’s Camp was sent to Jefferson City to ascertain from
the governor if he was ready to reinstate the Latter-day Saints on their
lands in Jackson County, and leave them there to defend themselves, as he
had previously indicated that he would. If so, they were ready, by command
of the Lord, to take that course.
In the meantime the camp continued on its journey. To
accept the governor’s proposition to sell their lands, was out of the
question; as soon would they expect to sell their children, for the Lord
had commanded them to retain their possessions, or inheritances in that
land. On the 15th of June, 1834, Orson Hyde and Parley P. Pratt, the
delegates, returned from Jefferson City and reported that the governor
refused to fulfil his promise. For some reason, which is not explained but
which may be guessed, he had received a change of heart, although his
reason was stated to be on the ground of “impracticability.” Such a
lamentable failure on the part of the governor to do his duty, was a
severe blow to the Saints.
Threats of the Mob
On the morning of June 19, 1834, as the camp was passing
through Richmond, Missouri, they were informed by a friendly farmer who
entertained them and gave them refreshments, that they had many enemies
about, and that a mob from Jackson and other counties was intending to
intercept them before they could reach their brethren in Clay County. This
was later confirmed. Their progress, by act of divine providence, was
impeded which forced them to camp between the Little and Big Fishing
rivers that night. As they were making camp five men rode up and told them
they would “see hell before morning.” They stated that an armed force from
Ray and Clay counties was to join a Jackson County force at the Fishing
River ford bent on the utter destruction of the camp. While these five men
were in the camp, cursing and swearing vengeance, signs of an approaching
storm were seen. No sooner had these men left the camp than the storm
burst in all its fury. Hailstones so large that they cut limbs from the
trees fell all around the camp, while the trees were twisted from their
roots by the force of the wind. The earth trembled and quaked, the streams
became raging torrents, and the mobbers dispersed seeking shelter that
could not be found. One mobber was killed by lightning and another had his
hand torn off by a fractious horse, and in fear they dispersed, saying, if
that was the way God fought for the “Mormons” they would go about their
business. On the morning of June 21, Colonel Sconce with two companions
visited the camp to learn what the intention of the members were. He said:
“I see there is an almighty power that protects this people, for I started
from Richmond, Ray County, with a company of armed men, having a fixed
determination to destroy you, but was kept back by the storm. The Prophet
related to these men the sufferings of the Saints, and they left the camp
offering to use their influence to allay the excitement which prevailed.
During all this storm the members of the camp were protected from its fury.
Judge Ryland’s Proposition
Evidently with the best of intentions, Judge John F.
Ryland, on the 10th of June 1834, wrote to Algernon S. Gilbert offering to
call a meeting in Liberty on the 16th, for the purpose of allaying the
“disturbances between the Mormons and the citizens of Jackson County.” A
similar communication was sent to prominent citizens of Jackson County. In
their answer Elders John Corrill and A. S. Gilbert expressed a
willingness to meet, but declared that under no condition would the Saints
sell their property in Jackson County. On the 16th, the proposed meeting
was held. A deputation from Jackson County was present and made a
proposition to this effect: They would buy all the lands that the
“Mormons” own in Jackson County, and also all improvements, the value of
said land to be determined by three disinterested parties; twelve of the
“Mormons” would be permitted to go into Jackson County, to show their
lands and improvements; the purchase was to be made within thirty days
after the decision was reached, and one hundred per cent would be added to
the appraisement. On the other hand, the “Mormons” were offered all the
lands of the citizens of Jackson on the same terms. This proposition was
signed by ten men who stated they were authorized to take this action.
After the reading of the proposition Samuel C. Owens,
one of the Jackson committee, made a war speech and was followed by Rev.
Riley who declared that “the Mormons have lived long enough in Clay
County; and they must clear out, or be cleared out.” The moderator of the
meeting. Mr. Turnham, replied: “Let us be republicans; let us honor our
country, and not disgrace it like Jackson County; don’t disfranchise or
drive away the Mormons. They are better citizens than many of the old
inhabitants.” General A. W. Doniphan arose and said: “That’s a fact,
and as the Mormons have armed themselves, if they don’t fight they are
cowards. I love to hear that they have brethren coming to their
assistance. Greater love can no man show, than he who lays down his life
for his brethren.” At this instant pistols and knives were drawn and the
cry was raised at the door that a man was stabbed. The mass instantly
rushed out to see what had happened, and the meeting broke up in confusion.
Unfairness of the Proposition
Reflecting on the proposition offered by the mob
committee from Jackson, the Prophet Joseph writes: “It may be thought, at
first view, that the mob committee made a fair proposition to the Saints,
in offering to buy their lands at a price fixed by disinterested
arbitrators, and one hundred per centum added thereto, payment to be made
in thirty days, and offering theirs on the same terms; but when it is
understood that the mob held possession of a much larger quantity of land
than the Saints, and that they only offered thirty days for the payment,
having previously robbed the Saints of nearly everything, it will be
readily seen that they were only making a sham to cover their previous
unlawful conduct.” To meet this proposition, which was not made in
sincerity, the Saints would have been under the necessity of raising in
thirty days approximately six hundred thousand dollars, a thing out of
reason, which the mobbers knew. Moreover, they were well aware of the fact
that the Saints would not sell although ten times the value of the land
were offered, for the Lord had commanded them to hold to their
inheritances.
Counter Proposition of the Saints
Some time later a counter proposition was made by the
Saints to the Missourians. They offered to buy out all those who were
unwilling to dwell in Jackson County with them in peace, on such terms as
had been offered except that the payment would be made in one year. A
committee of twelve, six from each side were to determine the value of the
lands. It is needless to say that the proposition was not received very
kindly by these hypocrites and deceivers.
Word of the Lord at Fishing River
While the camp was on Fishing River the word of the Lord
came to Joseph Smith (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 105) stating that it was not
required of the camp to continue the journey for the redemption of Zion.
The camp had been brought to the borders of Jackson County, “for a trial
of their faith.” However, if it had not been for transgression of the
people, the Lord declared, “they might have been redeemed even now. But
behold, they have not learned to be obedient to the things which I
required at their hands, but are full of all manner of evil, and do not
impart of their substance, as becometh saints, to the poor and afflicted
among them, and are not united according to the union required by the law
of the celestial kingdom. And Zion cannot be built up unless it is by the
principles of the law of the celestial kingdom, otherwise I cannot receive
her unto myself; and my people must needs be chastened until they learn
obedience, if it must needs be by the things which they suffer. I speak
not concerning those who are appointed to lead my people, who are the
first elders of my church, for they are not all under this condemnation;
but I speak concerning my churches abroad—there are many who will
say, Where is their God? Behold, he will deliver them in time of trouble,
otherwise we will not go up unto Zion, and will keep our moneys.
Therefore, in consequence of the transgression of my people, it is
expedient in me that mine elders should wait for a little season for the
redemption of Zion.”4 The elders were to be endowed with power
from on high in the house of the Lord at Kirtland, and be taught more
perfectly in doctrine and have experience and a better knowledge of their
duties, before Zion could be redeemed. This was one reason for the
building of the temple in Kirtland.
Disbanding of the Camp
On the 23rd of June (1834), the camp continued its march
and the next day arrived near the home of Algernon Sidney Gilbert on Rush
Creek, where, on the morning of the 25th, in compliance with the
revelation of the 22nd, the camp was separated into small groups to quiet
the feelings of the people, and dispersed among the brethren who were
residing in Clay County.
The Prophecy Fulfilled
As soon as the camp arrived on Rush Creek, the cholera
broke out among the members and continued for several days. The victims
were seized suddenly and so powerful was the disease that within a few
minutes some of the brethren were dead. About sixty-eight members were
attacked and fourteen died. Among the number who succumbed was Algernon
Sidney Gilbert, keeper of the Lord’s storehouse in Zion, and one of the
stalwart leaders who had stood in defense of the liberty and lives of the
Saints in Jackson County.
Organization of the High Council in Missouri
The day after the revelation was given regarding the
endowments (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 105), a council of high priests met and
called a number of individuals to receive these blessings in the house of
the Lord; and on the 3rd of July, 1834, the high priests assembled and a
high council for the Church in Missouri was organized agreeable to the
revelation and pattern given in Kirtland. Six days later the Prophet
started back for Kirtland with a number of the brethren.
What the Camp Accomplished
While the object for which Zion’s Camp was organized and
for which they made the journey, as understood by the members, was not
attained, yet without question they did accomplish all that the Lord
expected of them. So he stated in the Fishing River revelation. Their
faith was tried; experience had been gained by which men were to be chosen
for responsible positions in the Church in days to come, and the work of
the Lord advanced; but in addition to all this the Lord was preparing men
through this experience for the responsibility of moving the entire
people, of the Latter-day Saints in the great exodus to the West, which
was later to come. The purposes of the Lord do not fail and all things are
turned to his advantage.
Notes
At a meeting held in Kirtland Sept. 11, 1833, it was decided that a
press should be established in that place and a paper published to be
called the Messenger and Advocate, and that the Evening and Morning Star, formerly published in
Independence, be continued in Kirtland until it could again be published
in Zion, which the brethren thought would be but a short time. All the
numbers of the Star published in Independence were republished in quarto
size. The first number of the Star was issued in June, 1832, and the last
in July, 1833, the month the press was destroyed by the mob. In December,
1833, the first number in Kirtland (No. 15) was issued, it continued until
September 1834, when it was succeeded by the “Messenger and Advocate.”
See Doc. and Cov. Sec. 102, for procedure in High Councils and
minutes of this organization.
See Documentary History of the Church, vol.
2:79, for this interesting incident.
In a letter to the high council in Zion the Prophet said: “Now, my
beloved brethren, you will learn by this we have a great work to do, and
but little time to do it in; and if we do not exert ourselves to the
utmost in gathering up the strength of the Lord’s house that this thing
may be accomplished, behold there remaineth a scourge for the Church, even
that they shall be driven from city to city, and but few shall remain to
receive an inheritance.” This had reference to preparations “against the
time” when the Lord should call them again to the redemption of Zion.
Chapter 21
of the Kirtland Temple
Charges Against the Prophet
As already stated, there was some dissension in Zion’s
Camp on the way to Missouri. One of the chief offenders on that trip was
Sylvester Smith, and when he returned to Kirtland he repeated many of his
grievances against the Prophet Joseph Smith. This resulted in a trial
before the Bishop, Newel K. Whitney, and the high priests, and after a
full investigation, the Prophet was vindicated and Sylvester Smith after
much persuasion made confession of his wrongdoing, and repented of his sin.
The Law of Tithing
Up to this time the Saints had donated of their means
according to their disposition for the support of the Church. In Zion and
Kirtland the law of consecration had been given; but it had not been
generally practiced, and since the driving of the Saints from their homes,
they were compelled to seek a living individually after the manner of the
world. In the fall of 1834, Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery set an example
for the Church by covenanting with the Lord that they would give one-tenth
of all he should give them, to be bestowed upon the poor, as Jacob had
covenanted centuries before. This was nearly four years before this law of
tithing was given to the Church (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 119).
Oliver Cowdery Assistant President
December 5, 1834, Oliver Cowdery was ordained by Joseph
Smith by the command of the Lord, an Assistant President of the High
Priesthood, to hold the keys of presidency with Joseph Smith in this
ministry. This was in harmony with the ordinations he received under the
hands of John the Baptist and other holy messengers in 1829.1
Temporary Peace
Notwithstanding the Saints in Missouri were not
permitted to return to their possessions, the spirit of opposition began
to subside for a season, and the elders commenced going forth two by two,
preaching the Gospel throughout the land, and many were added to the
Church daily. The year 1834 came to a close with the Saints laboring
diligently to build the house of the Lord in Kirtland, and in preparing
for the School of the Elders which was to be held during the winter
months. In January, 1835, the School of the Elders commenced. Lectures on
theology were given and the study of the scriptures and other subjects
were considered for the benefit of the members of the Church, in keeping
with the revelations of the Lord.
Twelve Apostles Chosen
On the 14th of February, 1835, Brigham Young and his
brother Joseph came to the house of President Joseph Smith and sang for
him. While they were visiting with the Prophet on this occasion he told
them that he desired to call together all those who were members of Zion’s
Camp, for he had a blessing for them. At this meeting he conversed with
these two brethren on the scenes of their memorable journey and said:
“Brethren, I have seen those men who died of the cholera in our camp; and
the Lord knows, if I get a mansion as bright as theirs, I ask no more.” At
this he wept and could not speak for some time. He then said the Lord had
called Brigham Young to be one of the twelve special witnesses, and Joseph
Young to be a president of the seventies.
A meeting was called for the 14th of February, and on
that day all the members of Zion’s Camp that could be called together
assembled to receive such blessings as the Lord had promised them.
President Joseph Smith then stated that the object of the meeting was to
choose men for important positions in the ministry to go forth and prune
the vineyard for the last time. He had been commanded by the Lord to
prepare for the calling of Twelve Apostles, in fulfilment of the
revelation given before the organization of the Church (Doc. and Cov. Sec.
18). These twelve men were to be chosen from among those who went up in
Zion’s Camp, and the three special witnesses to the Book of Mormon were to
select and ordain them. After the usual opening exercises and appropriate
instructions a recess was taken for one hour. When the meeting was later
called to order the three witnesses were blessed by the laying on of hands
by the presidency; they then united in prayer and proceeded to make choice
of the Twelve Apostles. Their names in the order in which they were chosen
are as follows:2
- Lyman E. Johnson
- Brigham Young
- Heber C. Kimball
- Orson Hyde
- David W. Patten
- Luke S. Johnson
- William E. McLellin
- John F. Boynton
- Orson Pratt
- William Smith
- Thomas B. Marsh
- Parley P. Pratt
The witnesses then proceeded to ordain these brethren,
and the first three were ordained at that meeting. The following day all
the others except Parley P. Pratt, who was absent, Thomas B. Marsh and
Orson Pratt, who were on a mission, were ordained. Parley P. Pratt was
ordained February 21; Thomas B. Marsh on April 25 and Orson Pratt the
following day.
A charge was given to these brethren by President Oliver
Cowdery, and items of valuable instruction were imparted by President
Joseph Smith. In this way another important step in the development of the
Priesthood and the organization of the Church was accomplished.
The Seventy
On the 28th of February, 1835, another meeting was
called and selection was made from those who went to Missouri in Zion’s
Camp to create the first quorum of seventy. Hazen Aldrich, Joseph Young,
Levi W. Hancock, Leonard Rich, Zebedee Coltrin, Lyman Sherman and
Sylvester Smith were called to the office of presidents of this quorum of
seventy. These brethren and those appointed to form the quorum3
were ordained under the hands of the First Presidency. This was another
step toward the completion of the ministry and perfect development of the
latter day work. Each step came in its turn, and in like manner the
doctrines of the kingdom were unfolded, here a little and there a little,
until the perfect organization was established on the earth.
Blessings of Those Who Built the Temple
Another conference was called March 7, for the purpose
of blessing those who had assisted, by labor or other means, in the
building of the Kirtland Temple, which was nearing completion. This
conference continued during the 8th, and all those who were available were
blessed with special blessings who had assisted in this necessary work
preparatory to the receiving of the promised endowment.
The Great Revelation on Priesthood
The Twelve Apostles met in council, March 12, 1835, and
were appointed by the presidency to a mission through the Eastern States,
visiting the branches and regulating the affairs of the Church therein.
March 28, as they were about ready to depart, they sought the Prophet for
a blessing by revelation from the Lord. “We have unitedly asked God our
heavenly Father to grant unto us,” they said, “through his seer a
revelation of his mind and will concerning our duty the coming season,
even a great revelation, that will enlarge our hearts, comfort us in
adversity, and brighten our hopes amidst the powers of darkness.” They
were not disappointed, for the Lord gave unto them a great revelation on
Priesthood (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 107) in which the various offices, and the
powers pertaining thereto, were fully defined. It was explained that there
are two Priesthoods in the Church, “namely, the Melchizedek and the
Aaronic, including the Levitical Priesthood. Why the first is called the
Melchizedek Priesthood, is because Melchizedek was such a great High
Priest. Before his day it was called The Holy
Priesthood after the Order of the Son of God; but out of respect or
reverence to the name of the Supreme Being, to avoid the too frequent
repetition of his name, they, the Church in ancient days, called that
Priesthood after Melchizedek, or the Melchizedek Priesthood. All other
authorities or offices in the Church are appendages to this Priesthood.”
4
Immediately following the giving of this revelation which sets
forth the duties of the twelve, the apostles started on their first
missionary journey as they had been appointed.
The Book of Abraham
On the 3rd of July, 1835, Michael H. Chandler, came to
Kirtland exhibiting four mummies and some rolls of papyrus covered with
hieroglyphic figures. Mr. Chandler had been directed to the Prophet Joseph
Smith as one who could translate the characters for him. At his request
Joseph Smith gave a translation of a few of them which Mr. Chandler stated
agreed with the decipherings of learned men who had examined them. He gave
the Prophet a certificate to this effect. Shortly after this interview
some of the Saints in Kirtland purchased the mummies and the manuscripts,
and, with Oliver Cowdery and Wm. W. Phelps as scribes, the Prophet
commenced to translate these records. To their great joy they discovered
that one of these rolls contained writings of Abraham, or instructions
given to him in Egypt from the Lord. The other contained writings of
Joseph, son of Jacob. During the summer the Prophet prepared for the
complete translation of the Book of Abraham, as it is called, which now
appears in the Pearl of Great Price,5 one of the accepted
standard works of the Church.
The Doctrine and Covenants
A general assembly of the Church was held in Kirtland,
August 17, 1835, to consider the labors, of a committee appointed by a
general assembly of the Church, September 24, 1834, for the purpose of
arranging the items of doctrine and the revelations for publication. This
committee was composed of the following: Joseph Smith, Oliver Cowdery,
Sidney Rigdon and Frederick G. Williams. The committee having finished
their work they called a general assembly on the above date to consider
their labors. It should be understood that the printing of the revelations
according to the action of the conference of the Church, on a previous
date in 1831, had miscarried, due to the destruction of the printing press
in Independence in July, 1833, and the destruction of most of the forms
which had been issued up to that time. At this general assembly Oliver
Cowdery and Sidney Rigdon, of the presidency, were in charge; the Prophet
and Frederick G. Williams were at the time on a visit in Michigan. All the
quorums of the Priesthood were arranged in order; Thomas Burdick, Warren
Parrish and Sylvester Smith were appointed clerks. The usual procedure at
conferences of the Church was followed, and the morning session was
devoted to ordinations and the transaction of other important business. In
the afternoon Oliver Cowdery introduced the “Book of Doctrine and
Covenants of the Church” in behalf of the committee. Sidney Rigdon
followed with instructions pertaining to the manner of voting, by which
they intended to obtain the voice of the assembly for or against the book.
Each of the councils and quorums of the Priesthood then by separate vote
acknowledged the revelations which had been selected for a place in the
book, as from the Lord, and the doctrine and covenants of their faith. A
written acknowledgment from the Twelve Apostles, which had evidently been
prepared before their departure for their mission, was read. It is as
follows:
Testimony of the Twelve Apostles to the Truth of the
Book of Doctrine and Covenants
“The testimony of the Witnesses
to the Book of the Lord’s Commandments, which commandments he gave to
his Church through Joseph Smith, Jr., who was appointed, by the voice of
the Church, for this purpose.“We therefore feel willing to bear testimony to all
the world of mankind, to every creature upon the face of all the earth,
that the Lord has borne record to our souls through the Holy Ghost shed
forth upon us, that these commandments were given by inspiration of God,
and are profitable for all men, and are verily true. We give this
testimony unto the world, the Lord being our helper; and it is through
the grace of God the Father, and His Son Jesus Christ, that we are
permitted to have this privilege of bearing this testimony unto the
world, in the which we rejoice exceedingly, praying the Lord always that
the children of men may be profited thereby.Thomas B. Marsh,
David W. Patten,
Brigham Young,
Heber C. Kimball,
Orson Hyde,
William E. McLellin,
Parley P. Pratt,
Luke S. Johnson,
William Smith,
Orson Pratt,
John F. Boynton,
Lyman E. Johnson.”
To the revelations were added by vote of this assembly,
the Lectures on Faith, which had been given in the School of the Elders
(Prophets) earlier in the year, and an article on Government and Laws in
General; also one on Marriage. These lectures and the two articles
mentioned were not received, however, as doctrine and binding on the
Church, as were the revelations. The minutes of this gathering were signed
by Oliver Cowdery and Sidney Rigdon as Presidents, and by the three
clerks. They were published in the book when printed, with a preface
signed by the presidency, with date of February 17, 1835.
Close of the Year 1835
The close of the year 1835 found the Prophet busy
working on the Book of Abraham, which, among other great truths, revealed
principles pertaining to astronomy as taught to Abraham. Many council
meetings were held, and the twelve were instructed that they were to take
their families and move to Missouri the following summer with the
presidency, after the endowment in the temple was received. The School of
the Elders was continued, and the study of grammar and Hebrew, under a
competent instructor, became an important part of their work. The elders
were preparing for the solemn assembly which was soon to convene in the
Kirtland Temple, now nearly completed. Peace and tranquility prevailed,
which permitted the Prophet and the Saints to accomplish many things
essential to the welfare of the Church. The one thing that marred the
peace which was granted for a season was the rebellious spirit manifested
by William Smith against the Prophet, which nearly cost William his
standing in the Church. Charges were made against him before the high
council, but on his show of repentance he was forgiven. Christian Whitmer,
one of the eight witnesses to the Book of Mormon, died in Clay County,
Missouri, November 27, 1835, firm in the faith. He was one of the members
of the high council in Missouri.
Anointing and Blessings in the Temple
Much time was spent in January and February, 1836, in
council meetings and the filling of vacancies in the various organizations
of the Priesthood. Professor Seixas, a thorough Hebrew scholar, was
employed to teach the Hebrew language, in the stead of Dr. Piexotto, who
had failed to live up to his contract. Thursday, January 21, the first of
a number of meetings in the temple was held. These gatherings continued
through several days, in which the faithful elders of the Church received
blessings by the laying on of hands and anointing with oil.
At this first meeting the presidency met, and Father
Joseph Smith, the patriarch, was anointed and blessed. He then anointed
and blessed each of the brethren of the presidency, beginning with the
oldest, pronouncing such blessings upon them as the Spirit of the Lord
revealed, and many prophecies were uttered by each of them.
A Vision
While thus engaged the heavens were opened and the
Prophet received the following vision:
“I beheld the celestial kingdom of God, and the glory
thereof, whether in the body or out I cannot tell. I saw the
transcendent beauty of the gate through which the heirs of that kingdom
will enter, which was like unto circling flames of fire; also the
blazing throne of God, whereon was seated the Father and the Son. I saw
the beautiful streets of that kingdom, which had the appearance of being
paved with gold. I saw Fathers Adam and Abraham, and my father and
mother, my brother, Alvin, that has long since slept, and marveled how
it was that he had obtained an inheritance in the kingdom, seeing that
he had departed this life before the Lord had set his hand to gather
Israel the second time and had not been baptized for the remission of
sins.“Thus came the voice of the Lord to me, saying—
“‘All who have died without a knowledge of this
Gospel, who would have received it if they had been permitted to tarry,
shall be heirs of the celestial kingdom of God; also all that shall die
henceforth without a knowledge of it, who would have received it with
all their hearts, shall be heirs of that kingdom; for I, the Lord, will
judge all men according to their works; according to the desire of their
hearts.’“And I also beheld that all children who die before
they arrive at the years of accountability are saved in the celestial
kingdom of heaven.”
Many other wonderful manifestations they beheld, and
angels ministered to them; the power of the Lord rested upon them and the
house was filled with the glory of God. The Prophet’s scribe, Warren
Parrish, saw the armies of heaven, and visions of the redemption of Zion.
At this and succeeding meetings the various councils and
presiding officers in the several quorums, each in turn, received
blessings by the anointing of oil and laying on of hands, such as the
patriarch and presidency had received, and the visions of heaven were
opened to their view with wonderful manifestations of the glory and power
of God, and they shouted, “Hosanna to God and the Lamb.”
The Solemn Assembly
In the city of Kirtland on Sunday, March 27, 1836, the
members of the Church realized their hopes, long anticipated, when they
gathered in the temple in solemn assembly. As early as 1832, the Lord had
given commandment for the building of a house to his name, for such a
place was not to be found on the earth; nor had there been for many
centuries. The ground was broken for this building, June 5, 1833; the
corner stones were laid on the 23rd of the following month—the same
day the Saints in Jackson County were forced by mob violence from their
homes. Now the house was finished; a monument to the faith and industry of
the little band of Latterly Saints who had constructed it in their
poverty, amidst the threatened violence of enemies. It is a building of no
mean proportions; built of stone; eighty feet in length, sixty in width,
fifty feet to the square, with a tower one hundred ten feet from the
ground. The 27th of March, 1836, was a solemn and momentous occasion. Long
before the appointed hour the building was thronged with eager and
interested people, many were turned away for lack of room. At nine o’clock
the session was called to order by President Sidney Rigdon, who, in the
midst of breathless silence, read the 96th and the 24th psalms. The choir
then sang: “Ere long the veil will rend in twain”—which declaration
was to be fulfilled earlier than the congregation realized. After prayer
and another song appropriate remarks were made, and then the various
officers of the Church were sustained by separate vote, which procedure
was interspersed with singing.
The Prayer of Dedication
The prayer of dedication which had been given by
revelation (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 109) was offered and the house was
presented to the Lord.6 Following the prayer, the congregation sang
the hymn Hosanna7 which had been written for this occasion,
and then shouted “Hosanna, hosanna, hosanna, to God and the Lamb,” sealing
it with “Amen, Amen, and Amen.” Angels were present and the Holy Spirit,
like the sound of a mighty rushing wind, filled the house and rested upon
the assembly. The people of the neighborhood came running together hearing
a strange sound and seeing a bright light resting on the temple. The house
had been accepted by the Lord.
Endowments Given
As soon as the Temple was dedicated, ordinance work for
the elders was commenced. The ordinance of washing of feet—which the
Prophet said was never intended but for the official members of the Church
8
—was attended to in behalf of the leading quorums, and
other ordinances were performed. The Savior appeared to several of the
brethren and angels ministered to others in these meetings. It was indeed
a time of Pentecost to the Saints.
The Coming of Moses, Elias and Elijah
After the administering of the Sacrament in the temple
at the meeting held Sunday, April 3, 1836, Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery
retired to the pulpit, the veils9 being dropped, and
there bowed in silent prayer. After rising from their knees the Savior
appeared to them standing on the breast-work of the pulpit and blessed
them, accepting the building in his name. After this vision closed, the
heavens were again opened, and Moses appeared committing to them the keys
of the gathering of Israel; Elias, who lived in the days of Abraham, then
appeared, and committed to them the keys of the dispensation of the Gospel
of Abraham. Then another glorious vision burst upon them and Elijah
appeared and committed to them the keys, in fulfilment of the prediction
of Malachi, of the turning of the hearts of the fathers to the children,
and the hearts of the children to the fathers, which was to be done before
the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord.10
The Elders Prepared to Teach
In the revelation given on Fishing River (Doc. and Cov.
Sec. 105) the Lord had said the elders must be endowed with power from on
high before they would be fully prepared to go forth to build up the
Church and “prune” his vineyard. This endowment having now been received,
and the various keys of different dispensations having now been restored,
the elders were prepared for their ministry among the nations of the
earth. Following these blessings they began to go forth spreading abroad
in all parts of the land, preaching the word in power as they had never
experienced it before, and many received their testimony and were numbered
among the people of the Lord.
Notes
1. The record which gives an account of this
ordination has this to say: “The office of Assistant President is to
assist in presiding over the whole Church, and to officiate in the absence
of the President, according to his rank and appointment, viz.; President
Cowdery, first; President Rigdon, second, and President Williams, third,
as they were severally called. The office of this Priesthood is also to
act as spokesman, taking Aaron for an example. The virtue of the above
Priesthood is to hold, the keys of the kingdom of heaven or the Church
militant” (MS. History of the Church Book A,
Chapter 1).
The account of Oliver’s ordination is given in the same
record as follows: “After addressing the throne of mercy, President Smith
laid hands upon High Counselor Cowdery, and ordained him to the Presidency
of the High Priesthood in the Church, saying: ‘Brother, in the name of
Jesus Christ of Nazareth, who was crucified for the sins of the world,
that we through the virtue of his blood might come to the Father, I lay my
hands upon thy head, and ordain thee a President of the High and Holy
Priesthood, to assist in presiding over the Church, and bearing the keys
of this kingdom—which Priesthood is after the order of Melchizedek
—which is after the order of the Son of God.’”
2. Later they were arranged in order of precedence
according to age as follows:
- Thomas B. Marsh
- David W. Patten
- Brigham Young
- Heber C. Kimball
- Orson Hyde
- William E. McLellin
- Parley P. Pratt
- Luke S. Johnson
- William Smith
- Orson Pratt
- John F. Boynton
- Lyman E. Johnson
For the names of those who formed this quorum of seventy see the Documentary History of the Church, vol. 2:203; and
for the names of the members of Zion’s Camp see the same volume, pages 183
–5.
This important revelation should receive careful study for few
revelations have been given containing greater instruction for the Church.
This Book of Abraham, like the Book of Moses, which also appears in
the Pearl of Great Price, is another addition to our collection of lost
scripture which the Lord, through his wisdom, has restored. These records
contain many important revelations, and should be carefully read. The
history of the discovery of these rolls of papyrus, and the guiding hand
of the Lord which placed them in the hands of Joseph Smith is set forth in
the Documentary History of the Church, vol. 2:348
–51. See also Messenger and Advocate, Dec.
1835.
These ceremonies were repeated for the benefit of those who could not
gain admittance at the first session.
“The Spirit of God like a fire is burning.”
Documentary History of the Church, vol. 2:309.
There were four veils in the temple arranged crosswise, so that they
could be lowered and divide the assembly room into four parts.
See Doc. and Cov. Sec. 110, for an account of these visions.
Chapter 22
Sorrow
Dishonorable Action of Governor Dunklin
Governor Daniel Dunklin, of Missouri, who showed some
sense of honor and willingness to enforce the law at the beginning of the
trouble in Jackson County, later manifested a spirit of fellowship with
the stronger side, against right and justice—a trait common with
many politicians. In a communication to William W. Phelps and others,
bearing date of July 18, 1836, he cravenly insinuated that the mobbings
and expulsion of the Latter-day Saints from Jackson County, was due to
faults of their own; the people would not have united against them,
without some reason, and while they had some friends at first even these
had forsaken them. Whether his conclusion was right or wrong, he
maintained it to be the duty of the Saints to convince their enemies of
their innocence and worthiness. “If you cannot do this,” he wrote, “all I
can say to you is that in this Republic the vox populi is the vox Dei.”
Such was the contemptible answer of the governor of a sovereign state, to
an innocent people, driven from their homes and smitten by their enemies,
because of their faith in the Gospel of our Redeemer.
Clay County Rejects the Saints
When the exiled Saints were driven from Jackson County,
they found a place of refuge in Clay County, just over the Missouri River
to the north. Here the people were hospitable and kindly disposed. The
Saints had no intention of remaining in Clay County, for they fully
expected to be restored to their former homes. After exhausting every
source of redress, even to an appeal to the President of the United
States, they prepared to make permanent settlement by purchasing lands. As
time passed and the indication pointed to the gathering of the Latter-day
Saints in that county, the citizens became alarmed. The people from
Jackson were constantly menacing the Saints, even though they were
peacefully minding their business in their new homes, but wrong begets
wrong, and the deep-seated hatred of these mobbers had no end. Finally the
citizens of Clay County decided to do the wrong thing, to their
everlasting injury, and rid themselves, once and for all, from the danger
which they felt confronted them by harboring the “Mormons” in their midst.
That there was a danger of conflict there can be no question, with the
menacing influence on the south, and growing hatred, because of
association of the mobbers with many of the residents of the county to the
north. However, these Clay County citizens preferred to expel the Saints
in a gentle way if it could be done. A mass meeting was held June 29,
1836, for the purpose of presenting, with united front, a petition to the
undesirable exiles, kindly requesting them to move to some part of the
country where they could be entirely by themselves. The new country of
Wisconsin was suggested as a suitable place. A report of conditions as
they understood them and resolutions embodying their request, were
unanimously approved. They did not fail to call attention to their great
hospitality and kindness in 1833, when they received the exiles among
them; and endeavored to impress upon the Saints the thought that they were
devoid of “one spark of gratitude” if they refused to accept the
suggestions offered to depart in peace to a more congenial locality. Yet
they frankly admitted, “we do not contend that we have the least right to
expel them by force,” but if they would not go they were sure it would
lead to civil war, “bearing ruin, woe, and desolation, in its course.”
Some of the reasons why the “Mormons” had become
“objects of the deepest hatred and detestation” to many of the citizens
were declared in the petition to be as follows:
“They are eastern men, whose manners, habits, customs,
and even dialect, are essentially different from our own. They are
non-slave-holders, and opposed to slavery, which in this peculiar
period, when Abolitionism has reared its deformed and haggard visage in
our land, is well calculated to excite deep and abiding prejudices in
any community where slavery is tolerated and protected.“In addition to all this, they are charged, as they
have hitherto been, with keeping up a constant communication with our
Indian tribes on our frontiers, with declaring, even from the pulpit,
that the Indians are a part of God’s chosen people and are destined by
heaven to inherit this land, in common with themselves. We do not vouch
for the correctness of these statements; but whether they are true or
false, their effect has been the same in exciting our community. In
times of greater tranquility, such ridiculous remarks might well be
regarded as the offspring of frenzied fanaticism; but at this time, our
defenseless situation on the frontier, the bloody disasters of our
fellow citizens in Florida, and other parts of the South, all tend to
make a portion of our citizens regard such sentiments with horror if not
alarm. These and many other causes have combined to raise a prejudice
against them; and a feeling of hostility, that the first spark may, and
we deeply fear will, ignite into all the horrors and desolations of a
civil war, the worst evil that can befall any country.”
For these real and fancied “wrongs” this people must
move again, for their presence was obnoxious. These foolish citizens,
acting as they thought in their own best interests, rejected the
everlasting Gospel against themselves, as well as the people who
proclaimed it.
The Saints’ Reply
Three days later (July 1, 1836), the Saints met in
council and formulated their reply. They accepted the requisitions of the
citizens of Clay County, notwithstanding the added loss of property that
would be entailed. They also thanked these citizens for their hospitality
during the period of the sojourn among them, which covered a period of
more than two and one half years. Let it be said that many of these
citizens sympathized with the “Mormons” and proffered material help to aid
them in the removal from the county; but in this drastic action they were
acting, as they sincerely thought, in the best interests of their
communities.
When the First Presidency heard of this ultimatum they
fully endorsed the action taken by the Missouri Saints, and in a
communication to the Clay County committee notified them of the fact. They
also took occasion to inform the committee of many other things, in
humility, which should have appealed to their sense of justice and touched
their hearts.1
Caldwell County Organized
In pursuance of this action the Saints began to move
from Clay County as soon as circumstances would permit, and located on
Shoal Creek, in an uninhabited section in the north part of Ray County.
The property of the few settlers in that part, they purchased, and
commenced to build their homes. By December, 1836, a goodly number had
taken up their residence there and a petition was sent to the governor
asking for a county organization. This petition was granted about the
middle of that month. This organization, and the prospect of a peaceful
habitation, gave impetus to the growth of the “Mormon” colonies, and the
County of Caldwell, as it was called, “grew like Jonah’s gourd.”2
The Kirtland Safety Society
Affairs in Kirtland had been progressing smoothly for
some time, and many blessings were bestowed upon the people. Such a
condition, however, was not to last. On the 2nd of November, 1836,
articles of agreement were prepared for the organization of the “Kirtland
Safety Society Bank.” The State of Ohio, through prejudice, refused to
grant a charter, so the matter rested until January, 1837, when a society
was organized within the provisions of the law. Stock was subscribed for
and the business commenced. During this year (1837) speculation was at
high ebb throughout the entire nation. The Latter-day Saints in Kirtland
partook of that spirit; several business ventures had failed to come up to
expectations, and many of the members of the Church were financially
involved. The authorities of the Church, with others of the leading
brethren who had subscribed for stock in the Kirtland Safety Society,
pledged themselves to be responsible for the redemption of all the notes
of the institution, in proportion to the amount of stock subscribed. Since
they had no charter, other banking institutions refused their notes. The
cashier of this society, at one time the Prophet’s clerk and a faithful
elder in the Church, was found guilty of immoral conduct. He was forgiven
on a show of repentance and confession, and retained his standing in the
Church; but he never regained the spirit and shortly after became
disaffected. He misappropriated the funds of the society to the extent of
over twenty-five thousand dollars, which placed the institution in a
precarious condition. Seeing how matters were being conducted, the Prophet
gave a warning which was not heeded; therefore, early in the summer of
1837, he withdrew from the concern, resigned his office and disposed of
all his interests therein, stating that he was satisfied after five
months’ experience, “that no institution of the kind, established upon
just and righteous principles for a blessing not only to the Church, but
to the whole nation, would be suffered to continue its operations in such
an age of darkness, speculation and wickedness.”
The Financial Panic of 1837
At this time the panic of 1837, swept over the United
States. During the months of March and April, the failures in the City of
New York amounted to over $100,000,000 and hundreds of institutions were
driven to the wall. It was only natural that the Kirtland Safety Society,
so improperly managed, should share in the general condition of failure.
Other Causes of Embarrassment
Other causes for the financial stress among the Saints,
which also weighed heavily upon the heads of the Church, were the
afflictions undergone at the hands of enemies, and the expenses attached
to the erection of the Kirtland Temple. Moreover, the poor, destitute and
needy, who had received the Gospel came to Kirtland seeking assistance and
necessary homes. Large contracts for land were entered into for the
benefit of these poor, that they might obtain homes to call their own; but
those concerned were not always prompt in the payment of their dues—
a common failure of mankind.
Apostasy and Sorrow
As the fruit of this condition, an apostasy followed
rapidly, and it seemed, said the Prophet, “as though all the powers of
earth and hell were combining their influence in an especial manner to
overthrow the Church at once, and make a final end.” Enemies abroad, aided
by apostates within, united in various schemes to overthrow the Prophet as
if he had been the sole cause of all the evils, not only in the
communities of the Church, but throughout the entire land. Most of this
evil which befell the Church might have been avoided if the Prophet’s
counsel had been accepted by the Saints. Apostasy developed within all the
councils of the Church, and many of the leading brethren, who previously
had been true and faithful, were involved.
The Pure in Heart Able to Withstand
It is strange to think of this dire condition, when just
one brief year before, the glorious manifestations in the temple had been
given to many of these men, who now possessed such bitterness of spirit.
They seemed to have forgotten their many blessings, and the wonderful
visions, and the great promises made them by the Lord, if they would be
true and faithful in their ministry. The spirit of speculation and desire
for wealth, during the brief spell of peace and harmony, had beclouded the
minds of many, and their souls were filled with deadly hatred against
their former brethren. Joseph Smith was called a fallen prophet by those
whom he had cherished and loved, and whose love for him had been
pronounced. Some, in their bitterness and darkness of mind, sought his
life. Those who sought his welfare and spoke in his defense, were
ridiculed and treated with great contempt. It was a time when the souls of
men were tested, and only those who kept themselves pure and unspotted
from the sins of the world, were able to withstand the trial. Every
influence was brought to bear upon the members of the Church to get them
to renounce the Prophet. Many good men were dragged into the net; others
barely escaped, and only through their deep humility and great repentance,
were they spared the awful fate which carried so many to destruction. It
was during this time at disaffection that Brigham Young, Heber C. Kimball,
Wilford Woodruff, and others, including John Taylor and Willard Richards,
who had but recently joined the Church, stood nobly in defense of the
Prophet Joseph, in the face of a murderous spirit of opposition.
The Prophet’s Visit to Missouri
In September, 1837, Presidents Joseph Smith and Sidney
Rigdon went to Missouri to assist the Saints in that land in establishing
places of gathering. Other brethren from Kirtland accompanied them. They
arrived about the first of November in Caldwell County and immediately
went into council with the elders there, regarding locations for the
Saints. Those who met in council were Joseph Smith, Sidney Rigdon, Hyrum
Smith, Thomas B. Marsh, William E. McLellin, Lyman E. Johnson and William
Smith from Ohio, and the high council of the Church in Far West, with
William W. Phelps at their head. It was decided that there was room in
that land to make it desirable to invite the Saints from other parts to
locate there. The city Far West, which had been laid out and incorporated,
was chosen as a central gathering place. It was decided to postpone the
building of the Lord’s house in Far West, which had been decided on, until
the Lord should reveal his will to have it commenced.
Death of Jerusha Smith
A sad event occurred while Hyrum Smith was engaged in
Far West assisting the Saints to locate, in the death of his wife Jerusha
Barden Smith, October 3, 1837. “Tell your father when he comes that the
Lord has taken your mother home and left you for him to take care of,” was
her dying statement to her five little children.
Attempt to Depose the Prophet
Presidents Smith and Rigdon returned to Kirtland from
Missouri, on the 10th of December. They discovered that during their
absence, Warren Parrish, John F. Boynton, Luke S. Johnson, Joseph Coe,
Sylvester Smith, and other of the leading councils had united to overthrow
the Church. Some of these men had earlier in the year shown a spirit of
opposition, but on a show of repentance had been reinstated; but the evils
were not fully eradicated from their minds. Warren Parrish was a seventy,
who a few short months before shared the Prophet’s fullest confidence, as
one of his closest and dearest friends. Now, through transgression, he
became one of the Prophet’s bitterest enemies and the leader of a movement
to depose him and install David Whitmer in his stead. Meetings had been
held by this clique in the temple, which they claimed as their own, and
they resorted to violence to maintain their contention. In this manner the
Kirtland Temple, so recently accepted by the Lord, was desecrated and
defiled so that it ceased to be a sacred edifice to his holy name.
The British Mission
During these sad days of trial and tribulation, the word
of the Lord came to Joseph Smith stating that something must be done for
the salvation of the Church. The solution was the carrying of the Gospel
to Great Britain. On Sunday, the 4th day of June, the Prophet approached
Elder Heber C. Kimball in the Kirtland Temple and whispered to him,
saying: “Brother Heber, the Spirit of the Lord has whispered to me: ‘Let
my servant Heber go to England and proclaim my Gospel, and open the door
of salvation to that nation.’” Brother Kimball, feeling his weakness,
asked if Elder Brigham Young could not go with him. The Prophet answered
that the Lord had something else for Brigham Young to do. Following this
conversation Elder Kimball was set apart for this great work in the
British Isles, which was to be the first foreign mission of the Church.
While the First Presidency were setting Elder Kimball apart, Orson Hyde,
of the council of the twelve came in, and listening to the blessing being
given to his fellow laborer asked that he also might have the privilege of
assisting in that work. Elder Hyde had been among those disturbed because
of speculation. His heart melted within him and he now acknowledged his
faults, and sought a blessing. His offering was accepted and he was set
apart for the British labor.
The Work in Canada
The movement to send elders to Great Britain was the
outgrowth of the work in Canada. Several of the elders had taken trips to
Canada and had preached the Gospel there. Elder Orson Pratt was the first
to carry the message into Canada in the year 1833. In the fall of that
same year the Prophet and Sidney Rigdon went on a brief mission to Upper
Canada and made a number of converts. In 1836, Elder Parley P. Pratt went
to the City of Toronto and surrounding country and preached with wonderful
success. It was here at this time that Elder John Taylor, afterwards of
the council of the twelve and later President of the Church, received the
Gospel. It was also here, and due to the preaching of Elder Pratt, that
Joseph Fielding and his two sisters, Mary—who a few months later
became the wife of Hyrum Smith—and Mercy R., were baptized. Others
who received the Gospel in Canada were John Goodson, John Snyder and Isaac
Russell. All of these people were in correspondence with relatives and
friends in Great Britain whom they informed of the rise and progress of
the Church, thus preparing them for events to come.
Departure for Great Britain
Elder Willard Richards, having requested the privilege
of going to Great Britain, was set apart by Sidney Rigdon and Hyrum Smith,
on the 12th of June, 1837. The following day Elders Heber C. Kimball,
Orson Hyde, Willard Richards, and Joseph Fielding, a priest, who came from
Honeydon, England, left Kirtland on their mission to the British Isles.
They were accompanied on their journey as far as Fairport by Elder Brigham
Young and others. This little band of missionaries was later augmented by
the addition of Isaac Russell, John Goodson and John Snyder, and on the
23rd of June, 1837, they engaged passage on the merchant ship Garrick, for Liverpool. On the morning of the 20th of
July, the Garrick anchored in the River Mersey.
As soon as these brethren landed they went to Preston, about thirty miles
from Liverpool. It was election day for members of Parliament, and Queen
Victoria, who had recently come to the throne, was about to organize her
cabinet. As the missionaries alighted from their coach, they saw in
letters of gold on a banner above their heads an inscription, “Truth will
prevail,” which they accepted as a favorable omen.
Elder Joseph Fielding had a brother Rev. James Fielding,
who resided in Preston, and the brethren went to hear him preach on
Sunday, July 23, 1837. At the service Rev. Fielding unexpectedly announced
that there were present some ministers from America and they would occupy
his pulpit in the afternoon. The invitation was joyfully accepted and
President Kimball gave a brief address followed by Elder Hyde. That
evening Mr. Fielding again offered his pulpit to the brethren and Elder
Goodson and Brother Fielding preached. This was the opening of the door
for the Gospel in England.3
The following Wednesday (July 26, 1837) another meeting
was held in Rev. James Fielding’s chapel. Elders Hyde and Richards
preached and much interest was manifested by the congregation, many were
convinced and sought baptism. Fearing that he would lose his entire flock
the Rev. Fielding closed the doors of his chapel against the elders and
from that time opposed the work with all his power. However, the work was
started, a foothold had been gained, and the brethren received many
invitations to preach in private homes. The work spread rapidly throughout
the nation, many branches were organized and many souls sought salvation
through the remission of their sins.
Revelation to the Twelve
The same day that the Gospel was first preached in
England (July 23, 1837) the Lord gave a revelation through Joseph Smith to
Thomas B. Marsh and the twelve. They were commanded to gird up their
loins, take up their cross and follow the Savior and feed his sheep.
“Exalt not yourselves,” said the Lord, “rebel not against my servant
Joseph Smith, for verily I say unto you, I am with him, and my hand shall
be over him; and the keys which I have given unto him, and also to
youward, shall not be taken from him till I come.”
This was a timely warning, for even then some of the
members of that council were in secret collusion with enemies of the
Church. Their actions later developed, and before the close of the year
they were in open rebellion as previously indicated.
Frederick G. Williams Removed
A conference of the elders held in Far West, November 7,
1837, refused to sustain Frederick G. Williams as a counselor to President
Joseph Smith, and Hyrum Smith was appointed in his place. President
Williams, Lyman E. Johnson, Parley P. Pratt and Warren Parrish had
previously been cited to appear before a council of the Church, charges
having been preferred against them, but the council being improperly
organized, no action was taken at that time. President Williams became
disaffected with many others, due to speculations and financial troubles
in the fore part of the year 1837, and permitted himself to become
estranged from the work.
Flight of Brigham Young
The feeling of opposition against the Prophet became so
intense near the close of the year 1837, that it was with danger that
anyone in Kirtland could speak in his defense. On the morning of December
22, 1837, Elder Brigham Young left Kirtland because of the fury of the
enemies of the Church. Apostates had threatened to destroy him because he
continued to proclaim publicly that Joseph Smith was a prophet of the Most
High and had not transgressed and fallen, as the apostates declared.
This was the condition of affairs in Kirtland at the
close of the year 1837.
Notes
The minutes of these meetings and the communications involved in the
question of the removal of the Saints are found in full in the Documentary History of the Church, vol. 2:448–462.
The Missourians were willing—feeling that the section chosen by
the “Mormons” was of little value.
The inspiration of the Prophet Joseph to send elders to Great Britain
for the salvation of the Church, was fully attested, for members were
baptized by the thousands in the course of a few months following. Many of
them emigrated and became stalwarts in the Church, and branches of great
magnitude were raised up in various parts of England.
Chapter 23
Excommunication of Oliver Cowdery and Others
Lowering Clouds
Threatening and sinister were the clouds which hung over
the Church at the beginning of the year 1838. Apostasy had broken into the
ranks, and many of the former faithful defenders of the truth had fallen
by the wayside. Satan rejoiced, and the enemies of the Saints gained great
power, which was later to be made manifest with extreme bitterness.
Flight of Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon
So bitter became the spirit of opposition in Kirtland
that Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon were forced to seek safety in flight.
They departed from that place January 12, 1838, on horseback, and
journeyed towards Far West. Unjust and vexatious law suits had been
planted against them by their enemies. Several times Joseph had been cited
to appear before the courts on trivial charges, from which he was cleared,
which action did not tend to lessen the ugly feelings of his enemies. Some
sixty miles west of Kirtland they tarried at Norton, where they were
joined by their families. On the 16th, the journey was resumed, Elder
Brigham Young accompanying them. At Dublin, in Indiana, the Prophet sought
employment, cutting and sawing wood, to relieve his necessities. Here,
through the aid of Elder Young, a Brother Tomlinson sold some property,
and gave the Prophet three hundred dollars to help him on his way.
The weather was extremely cold and the fleeing brethren
were forced because of enemies, to secrete themselves in their wagons
without sufficient means to keep warm. Their adversaries followed them for
more than two hundred miles from Kirtland, with guns and knives, seeking
their lives. “They,” wrote the Prophet, “frequently crossed our track;
twice they were in the houses where we stopped, and once we tarried all
night in the same house with them, with only a partition between us and
them; and we heard their oaths and imprecations, and threats concerning
us, if they could catch us; and late in the evening they came into our
room and examined us, but decided we were not the men. At other times we
passed them in the streets, and gazed on them, and they on us, but they
knew us not.” About two hundred and twenty miles from Far West a number of
brethren met the Prophet, and assisted him with teams to that place, where
he arrived, March 14, 1838. He was welcomed by the Saints with open arms.
President Rigdon did not arrive in Far West until the 4th of April, having
been detained by sickness in his family.
Rejection of the Missouri Presidency
The spirit of darkness spread from Kirtland to Missouri,
and some of the leading brethren became affected. Martin Harris was
dropped from the high council in Kirtland, with three others, September 3,
1837, and Oliver Cowdery, who had been in transgression, was retained in
his calling on condition that he would repent; and should he fail to
repent, the Prophet said, “the Church will soon be under the necessity of
raising their hands against him; therefore pray for him.” These men, and
others in Kirtland, influenced some of the brethren in Missouri, and the
spirit of disaffection in Caldwell County commenced to grow. A general
assembly of the Saints was held in Far West, February 4, 1838, and the
members withdrew the hand of fellowship from their presiding officers,
David Whitmer, William W. Phelps and John Whitmer. Similar action was
taken on the succeeding days in Carter’s settlement, Durphy’s home, and
Haun’s Mill.
The charges against two of them, William W. Phelps and
John Whitmer, were that they had sold their possessions in Jackson County,
contrary to the revelations of the Lord, which was paramount to a denial
of the faith; and for the misappropriation of funds borrowed for the use
of the Church. The Lord, in a revelation, had rebuked these men for their
transgression and warned them, but they did not heed the warning. David
Whitmer was likewise charged with improper conduct and neglect of duty,
and with the violation of the word of wisdom, in the persistent use of
tea, coffee and tobacco, and the Church had gone on record by vote that
they would not sustain any officer who indulged in such things. Thomas B.
Marsh and David W. Patten were sustained as presiding officers in
Missouri, until the coming of Presidents Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon.
The three accused men persisted in showing contempt for the decision of
these conferences of the Church, in which action they were joined by
Oliver and Marcellus F. Cowdery; therefore they were cited to appear
before the high council, March 10, 1838, and William W. Phelps and John
Whitmer were excommunicated. Marcellus F. Cowdery was disfellowshipped and
the case of David Whitmer and Oliver Cowdery was held over for future
investigation.
Political Motto of the Church
Shortly after the arrival of Presidents Smith and Rigdon
in Far West the following political motto was adopted:
“The Constitution of our country formed by the fathers
of liberty. Peace and good order in society. Love to God, and good will
to man. All good and wholesome laws, virtue and truth above all things,
and aristarchy, live forever! But woe to tyrants, mobs, aristocracy,
anarchy, and toryism, and all those who invent or seek out unrighteous
and vexatious law suits, under the pretext and color of law, or office,
either religious or political. Exalt the standard of democracy; down
with that of priestcraft, and let all the people say, Amen! that the
blood of our fathers may not cry from the ground against us. Sacred is
the memory of the blood which bought for us our liberty.”
First General Conference at Far West
April 6, 1838, the first general conference of the
Church in Missouri was held at Far West. John Corrill and Elias Higbee
were chosen historians and George W. Robinson general church recorder and
clerk of the First Presidency. Thomas B. Marsh, David W. Patten and
Brigham Young were sustained as the presidency of the Church in Zion. The
following day, David W. Patten, in reporting the labors of the council of
the twelve, said he could not recommend William E. McLellin, Luke S.
Johnson, Lyman E. Johnson, John F. Boynton, and was doubtful of William
Smith. The other brethren were faithfully discharging their duties.
John Whitmer Withholds the Church Record
A demand by letter was made, by sanction of the
conference, of John Whitmer, the former historian, calling for the record
of the Church in his keeping. This he refused to deliver and retained it
until the day of his death. A copy of it is now in the archives of the
Church.
Oliver Cowdery, David Whitmer and Others
Excommunicated
Wednesday, April 11, 1838, Seymour Brunson preferred
nine charges against Oliver Cowdery who was cited to appear for trial the
following day. Oliver refused to appear, but sent a letter, written in a
very bitter spirit, and defiant attitude, in which he boasted of his
“personal liberty,” and with injured demeanor denied the right of any
church tribunal to control him in his temporal interests, which was
contrary to his constitutional privileges. Therefore he would voluntarily
“withdraw from a society assuming they have such right.” Two of the
charges when presented to the council were rejected and one was withdrawn,
the other six were sustained. There was no other course for the council to
take than to excommunicate the rebellious Assistant President of the
Church, who had turned so bitter in his feelings against his former
associates.
On the 9th, five charges were also preferred against
David Whitmer, who was cited to appear for trial on the 13th. David also
replied by letter, in which he refused to recognize the authority of the
general assemblies of the Church and the action taken against him; nor
would he recognize the authority of the present council which had been
called to try his case. And, since the council would pursue its “unlawful
course at all hazards,” he preferred to withdraw from their “fellowship
and communion—choosing to seek a place among the meek and humble,
where the revelations of heaven will be observed, and the rights of men
regarded.” Action was therefore taken against David Whitmer and thus
another of the special witnesses, was cut off from the Church.1
Lyman E. Johnson and William E. McLellin
The same day charges were preferred against Lyman E.
Johnson; these were sustained, and he was cut off from the Church. One
month later, May 11, 1838, William E. McLellin was handled for his
fellowship, and he also lost his standing in the Church. About this time
Jacob Whitmer and Hiram Page also left the Church having partaken of the
spirit of apostasy.
A Day of Sadness
This was a day of sadness for Joseph Smith. To see the
witnesses who were associated with him in the incipiency of the Church
fall by the wayside, touched his heart. Yet right must prevail, and
righteousness triumph, even though it should cause wounds which could not
be healed. To their credit, be it said, that none of the witnesses who had
beheld angels and the plates from which the Book of Mormon was translated,
ever denied their testimony concerning these things, notwithstanding the
extreme bitterness of heart they manifested against Joseph Smith the
Prophet.2
Return of Elders Kimball and Hyde
April 1, 1838, a conference of the Church was held in
Preston, England, in Temperance Hall (the “Cock Pit”), for the purpose of
setting in order the branches in that mission. Joseph Fielding was
sustained as President of the British Mission, to succeed Heber C.
Kimball, and Willard Richards and William Clayton, an English convert,
were chosen as his counselors. These men were ordained high priests. On
the 20th of April, 1838, Elders Kimball and Hyde sailed from Liverpool for
the United States, in the same ship which had carried them to England, the
Garrick. They arrived in Kirtland, May 21, 1838,
and immediately notified the Prophet, at Far West, of their good feeling
and firmness in the faith.
Far West—The House of the Lord
In a revelation given April 26, 1838, the Lord accepted
Far West as a central gathering place for the Saints in Missouri, and a
place of refuge, which should be holy and consecrated to him. There a
house was to be built to his name, and the beginning should be made on the
4th of July following, then the Saints were to continue their labors
diligently until the house was finished. However, the presidency, Joseph
Smith, Sidney Rigdon and Hyrum Smith, the latter having taken the place of
Frederick G. Williams, were not to get into debt. Other settlements in the
region round about besides Far West, were to be selected as gathering
places for the Saints, and stakes of Zion were to be established.
Stakes of Zion
In accordance with the revelation, about the middle of
May, 1838, Presidents Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon with a number of
other elders, including David W. Patten and Bishop Edward Partridge, took
a trip in the wilderness north of Far West for the purpose of locating
sites for settlements and the laying off of stakes of Zion. They pursued
their course up Grand River, some twenty-five miles to a place they called
Tower Hill, because they found ruins of an old Nephite tower there. Here
Elder Lyman Wight had his home, and here they camped May 20, which was the
Sabbath day. In the afternoon Presidents Smith and Rigdon, with their
clerk, George W. Robinson, went up the river about one half mile, to
Wight’s ferry, for the purpose of selecting and laying claim to a city
plat. This was in Daviess County, township 60, ranges 27 and 28, which the
brethren called “Spring Hill,” but by the mouth of the Lord, the record
states, “it was named Adam-ondi-Ahman, because, said he, it is the place
where Adam shall come to visit his people, or the Ancient of Days shall
sit, as spoken of by Daniel the Prophet.”3 We are also informed
that this is the place where Adam assembled his posterity three years
before his death, and there bestowed upon them his blessing. On that
occasion the Lord appeared to them, and the posterity of Adam rose up and
blessed him, and called him Michael, the Prince, the Arch-angel; and the
Lord administered comfort to Adam, and said unto him: “I have set thee to
be at the head—a multitude of nations shall come of thee, and thou
art a prince over them forever.”4 The name of this place
was first revealed as early as March, 1832, but it is evident that the
Saints did not know where Adam-ondi-Ahman was until this visit of these
brethren. Adam-ondi-Ahman is located on the north side of Grand River, in
Daviess County, Missouri, about twenty-five miles north of Far West. It is
situated on an elevation, which, said the Prophet, “renders the place as
healthful as any part of the United States.” It overlooks the river in a
wonderfully beautiful location.
Other Sites Chosen
Other territory, which was unoccupied, was also selected
for the gathering of the Saints, as the Lord had commanded by revelation.
The history gives the following account of the selection of these lands:
“Monday 21. This morning, after making some locations
in this place, which is in township 61, ranges 27 and 28, we returned to
Robinson’s Grove, about two miles, to secure some land near Grand River,
which we passed the day previous; and finding a mistake in the former
survey, I sent the surveyor south five or six miles to obtain a correct
line, while some of us tarried to obtain water for the camp. In the
evening I called a council of the brethren to know whether it was wisdom
to go immediately into the north country, or tarry here and hereabouts,
to secure land on Grand River. The brethren spoke their minds freely on
the subject, when I stated to the council that I felt impressed to tarry
and secure all the land near by, that is not secured between this and
Far West, especially on Grand River. President Rigdon concurred, and the
council voted unanimously to secure the land on Grand River, and between
this and Far West.”
For many days following, the brethren spent their time
surveying, selecting sites for settlements, building houses and preparing
for the gathering of the Saints who were rapidly coming to these parts. In
their travels they, at times, came across antiquities in the form of
mounds, which were erected by the ancestors of the Indians.
Independence Day at Far West
July 4, 1838, was spent by the Saints in celebrating
Independence Day. A declaration of independence from all mobs and
persecutors was declared, and after a parade the people assembled at the
excavation made for the building of the Lord’s house, and the corner
stones of the proposed temple were laid, agreeable with the commandment of
April 26, 1838.5 The southeast corner stone was laid by
Bishop Edward Partridge, assisted by twelve men; and the northeast corner
stone was laid by the teachers, assisted by twelve men. The building was
to be one hundred and ten feet long and eighty feet wide.
Sidney Rigdon was the orator of the day, and at the
close of these services, the assembly shouted hosanna, and after singing
they adjourned.
The Law of Tithing
The law of tithing, which was given as a substitute law
for consecration, and to act as a “school-master” to train the Saints, was
given July 8, 1838, at Far West, by revelation. Earlier, as we have
discovered, Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery made a covenant that they
would give one tenth of all they received, for the support of the poor.
Now the Prophet inquired of the Lord to know what course should be taken
by the Saints, and received the following revelation:
“Verily, thus saith the Lord, I require all their
surplus property to be put into the hands of the Bishop of my Church of
Zion, for the building of mine house, and for the laying of the
foundation of Zion and for the Priesthood, and for the debts of the
Presidency of my Church. And this shall be the beginning of the tithing
of my people; and after that, those who have thus been tithed, shall pay
one-tenth of all their interest annually; and this shall be a standing
law unto them forever, for my holy Priesthood, saith the Lord.“Verily, I say unto you, it shall come to pass, that
all those who gather unto the land of Zion shall be tithed of their
surplus properties and shall observe this law, or they shall not be
found worthy to abide among you.“And I say unto you, if my people observe not this
law, to keep it holy, and by this law sanctify the land of Zion unto me,
that my statutes and my judgments may be kept thereon, that it may be
most holy, behold, verily I say unto you, it shall not be a land of Zion
unto you; and this shall be an ensample unto all the stakes of Zion;
even so, Amen.”
It was also made known that the tithing should be
disposed of by a council composed of the First Presidency, Twelve Apostles
and Presiding Bishopric.6
The Mission of the Twelve
On the same day the revelation on tithing was received
the Lord also gave a revelation to the council of the apostles, calling
them to the foreign field in Europe. They were to take their departure
from the Saints in Far West on the 26th day of April, 1839, from the
building spot of the Lord’s house. How this revelation was fulfilled at
that date, in the midst of murderous opposition will later be shown. John
Taylor, John E. Page, Wilford Woodruff and Willard Richards, the latter at
the time acting as one of the presidency of the British Mission, were
called to the apostleship, to take the places of William E. McLellin, Luke
S. Johnson, John F. Boynton and Lyman E. Johnson, who had fallen.
Elders Heber C. Kimball and Orson Hyde, who had recently
returned from England, spoke at the meeting in Far West, Sunday, July 29,
1838, relating their remarkable experiences in that foreign field. On the
5th of August, at the meeting, Frederick G. Williams was re-confirmed a
member of the Church, he having been recently re-baptized. He had partaken
of the spirit of bitterness and opposition in Kirtland and through it lost
his place as one of the First Presidency, but had come to Far West seeking
fellowship in the Church.
The Kirtland Camp
A meeting of all the seventies in Kirtland was held in
the temple, March 6, 1838, to consider the removal of the Saints to
Missouri. The matter was left in the hands of the presidents and a meeting
called for the 10th instant. At this meeting the presidents reported; they
stated that it was doubtful that the journey could be taken in a body
because of the extreme poverty of the people. The effort of the high
council and high priests to get means and remove the Saints had failed,
and they, the seventies, felt that perhaps it would be better for the
journey to be taken as individuals. However, while they were in this
meeting the Spirit of the Lord rested upon them, and it was made known
that they should journey as a body to Zion, according to the commandments
and revelations, pitching their tents by the way, and by doing this they
should not want for any necessity while on their travels.
This action having been decided, a constitution for
their government on the journey was drawn up under the supervision of
President Hyrum Smith, and adopted. They were to travel under the
direction of the seven presidents, but organized in companies and
divisions, for their guidance and convenience. On the 6th day of July,
1838, the journey was commenced. There were in the camp 529 souls, 256
males, and 273 females, consisting of 105 families. A few others joined
them on the way. In this manner one of the most remarkable migrations
covering a distance of approximately nine hundred miles was undertaken by
these afflicted Saints. The Lord blessed them abundantly on their way.
Their provisions, like the widow’s meal and cruse of oil, were not
diminished, and they were fed miraculously during their journey. As might
be expected, there were among them some who complained, and a few were
expelled from the camp to travel alone because of the infraction of the
rules; but the great majority traveled in humility and obedience. A few
died, which brought sorrow to the camp; some obtained employment among the
people of the various settlements through which they passed, and in this
way means were obtained to help them on the way. After enduring various
trials and afflictions, incident to a journey of this proportion, they
arrived at their destination, Far West, October 2, 1838. There they
received a joyful salutation from their brethren. On the 3rd, they
continued their march to Ambrosial Creek and on the 4th near sunset
pitched their tents at the public square of Adam-ondi-Ahman. Thus the
Saints from Kirtland and those scattered abroad began to gather to the
settlements in Missouri: but their peace and happiness were not to remain
undisturbed, for the threatening clouds of mobocracy were already
gathering.
Notes
For full account of these trials see Documentary
History of the Church, vol. 3:16–20.
During these days of darkness all three of the special witnesses of
the Book of Mormon left the Church. So also did three of the eight
witnesses, viz. Jacob Whitmer, John Whitmer and Hiram Page. Christian
Whitmer died in full fellowship and with a strong conviction of the truth,
in Missouri, Nov. 27, 1835, and his brother Peter Whitmer Jr., died
September 22, 1836, also firm in the faith and fellowship of the Saints.
Later Oliver Cowdery and Martin Harris returned to the Church and died in
full fellowship, also Luke S. Johnson and many others who became
disaffected during these days of tribulation.
Doc. and Cov. Sec. 116. Daniel 7th chapter.
Doc. and Cov. Sec. 107: 53–55.
Doc. and Cov. Sec. 115.
See Doc. and Cov. Sec. 119 and 120.
Chapter 24
of Extermination
Election Day at Gallatin
At the election held at Gallatin, Daviess County,
Missouri, August 6, 1838, hostilities between the Missourians and the
“Mormons” broke out. This was the kindling of the flame which was to
result in the expulsion of the Latter-day Saints from that state. The
Saints had been warned two weeks before by Judge Morin, candidate for the
state senate, that an attempt would be made to prevent them from voting;
however, they paid little attention to the warning, hoping for better
things. On that day, as a number of the brethren approached the polls,
Col. William P. Peniston, who had led a mob against the Saints in Clay
County, mounted a barrel and harangued the crowd, which he had gathered
for the purpose, against the “Mormons.” He accused their leaders of
various vicious crimes and called the members “dupes, and not too good to
take a false oath . . . they would steal, and he did not
consider property safe where they were; that he opposed their settling in
Daviess County, and if they suffered the “Mormons” to vote, the people
would soon lose their suffrage.” Peniston was a candidate for the
legislature, and knowing the brethren would not vote for him, he was
determined to prevent them forcibly from casting their ballots.
The result was that a premeditated attack was made upon
the little band of voters. These “Mormons,” about twelve in number, held
their ground against a force of over one hundred. Many heads were broken
in the conflict. Elder John L. Butler, filled with righteous rage, seized
a club and knocked men down right and left. The mobbers disbursed swearing
vengeance and threatening to get fire arms and return. The brethren were
persuaded by the election officials to depart to save further conflict,
since this was a prearranged attack, and their enemies came fully
intending to create trouble. The brethren returned to their homes,
collected their families and concealed them in the thickets, while they
stood guard over their homes during the night.
The Prophet’s Investigation
The next day the report having reached Far West that two
or three of the brethren had been killed and the Missourians would not
permit their bodies to be removed, or interred, Joseph Smith and about
fifteen others armed themselves and started for Gallatin. At Colonel Lyman
Wight’s home they learned the correct status of the affair. On the 8th,
some of the brethren called at the home of Adam Black, justice of the
peace and judge elect for Daviess County, and had some conversation with
him in which they asked him if he was their friend or enemy. While he said
some very bitter things against the “Mormons,” he assured them that he was
not in sympathy with the mob, and would not aid them. He was asked if he
would make such a statement in writing, and willingly did so in the
following unique document:
“I, Adam Black, a justice of the Peace of Daviess
County do hereby Sertify to the people coled Mormin, that he is bound to
support the Constitution of this State and of the United States and he
is not attached to any mob, or will he attach himself to any such
people, and so long as they will not molest me, I will not molest them.
This the 8th day of August, 1838.“Adam Black.”
Peniston’s Affidavit
Two days after the interview with Adam Black, William P.
Peniston, William Bowman and others, made affidavit before Judge Austin A.
King, stating that the “Mormons,” to the number of about five hundred men,
were armed and collected in Daviess County, for the purpose, they verily
believed, of committing great violence to the citizens, and to take
vengeance for some injuries, or imaginary injuries, done to some of their
friends, and to intimidate and drive from the country all the old
citizens, and possess themselves of their lands, or to force such as do
not leave, to come into their measures and submit to their dictation. They
also stated that about one hundred and twenty men did commit violence on
Adam Black, “by surrounding his house and taking him in a violent manner,
and subjecting him to great indignities, by forcing him, under threats of
immediate death, to sign a paper writing of a very disgraceful character.”
Adam Black made affidavit of similar nature on August
28, 1838,1 in this manner maliciously falsifying and
breaking his promise made to the brethren.
Effect of These Falsehoods
These emissaries of evil knew the effect of their
falsehoods would be to stir the Missourians, who needed very little
provocation, to acts of violence against the “Mormons.” They also hoped,
with apparent reason, to win the sympathy of the officers of the state,
especially Governor Lilburn W. Boggs. In fact it is not so clear that the
governor was not secretly aiding them. He had been elected to the highest
office in the state since the disgraceful expulsion of the Saints from
Jackson County, in which he took a very prominent part.
Mob Gatherings
These evil reports soon spread through other counties,
and the people were informed by many rumors that the “Mormons” were
preparing to commit acts of violence against the older citizens, in other
parts of the state. Every conceivable plan was adopted to provoke the
members of the Church to acts of violence. Their enemies captured
prisoners and punished them: then circulated the report in the “Mormon”
settlements that these prisoners had been tortured to death. Thus they
hoped to stir the Saints up to anger, trusting they would seek revenge
that occasion might be found against them as the aggressors; but the Lord
revealed the evil intent of their adversaries.
Arrest of Joseph Smith and Lyman Wight
Based on these falsehoods of Peniston, Black, et al.,
charges were preferred against Joseph Smith and Lyman Wight. At first they
objected to being tried in Daviess County, where the writ was issued,
because of the enmity of the citizens there. After consulting with their
attorneys, Atchison and Doniphan, they volunteered to be tried in Daviess
County, before Judge Austin A. King. When the trial was held, Adam Black
was the only witness who appeared against them, and William P. Peniston
was the prosecutor. Several witnesses, both non-members and members of the
Church, testified in their defense. However, the judge, who manifested a
bitter spirit, bound them over in the sum of five hundred dollars. At the
close of the trial he admitted to some of the witnesses that there was no
evidence to warrant his action, but the people demanded it.
Proclamation of Governor Boggs
These rumors and false affidavits reached the governor,
as their authors intended they should. On the pretext that the “Mormons”
had entered into an alliance with the Indians and were in rebellion,
Governor Boggs issued an order, through Adjutant General B. M. Lisle,
to General Atchison and six other commanders of the militia, that as a
“precautionary measure,” an effective force of the militia be held in
readiness to meet either contingency (i.e., the rising of the Indians or
the “Mormons”). This force was to consist of four hundred men from each of
seven divisions, mounted, armed, and equipped as infantry or riflemen, and
formed into companies according to law, thus making a force of 2,800 men.
During all this excitement armed forces of the mob were
collecting at various points and making threats against the Saints. Under
the direction of the civil authorities, some of the brethren who were
members of the state militia, intercepted a wagon load of arms and
ammunition on the way to a camp of mobbers. These brethren from Far West
took the guns and supplies, arrested three men who appeared to be in
charge, and carried them to Far West. Here the men were examined before
Albert Petty, justice of the peace, and held in bail to appear at the next
term of the circuit court. Judge King was informed of the action taken and
he replied that the prisoners should be turned loose and treated kindly.
What disposition to make of the guns he did not seem to know, but said
they belonged to the militia. Because of this statement, the brethren kept
the guns and distributed them; but later, on the order of General
Doniphan, they were gathered and delivered up to him.
Austin’s Mob Force at Diahman
False accusations continued to spread and great
excitement was manifest on every hand. The militia, according to the order
of Governor Boggs, was mustered into service. In their ranks were many of
the most bitter enemies of the Saints. Near Diahman a large mob force had
gathered under the command of Dr. Austin, armed and in a threatening mood.
General Doniphan, with an equal force of militia ordered them to disperse.
They claimed that they had gathered in self defense, yet they were
besieging the small settlement of “Mormons” at Diahman. Lyman Wight, who
was a colonel in the state militia, had gathered such force as he could to
protect the Saints. At the request of Doniphan he showed a willingness to
disperse, but demanded that the force under Austin do the same. This,
however, the force under Austin refused to do. General Doniphan took up a
position between the mob and the people at Diahman, hoping that in a few
days they would all disband.
Siege of De Witt
When Austin saw that his purpose to destroy Diahman was
foiled he moved his force to De Witt, in Carroll County, with the
determination of expelling the “Mormons” from that place. The citizens
here attempted to defend themselves the best they could, and Austin
thereupon laid siege to the town, firing upon the inhabitants from time to
time, and threatening their extermination or removal from the state. In
the meantime both Atchison and Doniphan, as well as a committee of
citizens from Chariton County, who had come to investigate the situation,
reported to the governor that the “Mormons” were very much alarmed and
entirely on the defensive in this unequal conflict. General Atchison
writing to the governor said: “Things are not so bad in that county as
represented by rumor, and in fact, from affidavits I have no doubt your
Excellency has been deceived by the exaggerated statements of designing or
half crazy men. I have found there is no cause of alarm on account of the
‘Mormons;’ they are not to be feared; they are very much alarmed.” When
the governor received these reports he seemed very much elated, and
replied: “The quarrel is between the ‘Mormons’ and the mob, and they can
fight it out.” Nevertheless, when he discovered that the “Mormons” were
determined to fight it out and maintain their legal and constitutional
rights against such overwhelming odds, he was much incensed, which later
events will show.
Defense of De Witt
The forces of the Saints at De Witt, under Lieutenant
Colonel George M. Hinkle, who held a commission in the state militia,
prepared to defend themselves against their foes, who had come upon them
without warrant or provocation. The mob forces under Dr. Austin first
threatened De Witt, September 21, 1838, in defiance of all law, and
ordered the inhabitants to leave the country by October first. If they
were not gone by that time they were to be exterminated, “without regard
to age or sex.” The following day the citizens of the town petitioned
Governor Boggs for relief against the mob. The governor turned a deaf ear
to all appeals from the Saints, and seemingly failed to heed the
expressions of any but their enemies. The siege of De Witt continued until
the 11th of October, in the presence of state troops, under General Parks
and Captain Bogart, a Methodist preacher, who looked on, but made no
effort to interfere.
The Prophet Visits De Witt
When Joseph Smith learned of the distress of his
brethren in De Witt, he paid a visit to that place. Although the town was
under siege by the mob, he risked his life and slipped past the guards. He
found the poor Saints in dire distress; their provisions were gone, and
they had no prospect of obtaining more; their cattle had been driven off
and consumed by their enemies. Again an appeal was made to the governor,
through the services of a number of gentlemen, not members of the Church,
but who understood the situation. This appeal was unheeded. On the 11th of
October the Saints accepted the proposition of the mob, to vacate De Witt,
with the understanding that they were to be recompensed for the loss of
their property. That afternoon they started for Far West, destitute,
hungry and cold. They were emaciated by their long siege; many had died
from this abuse; several more died on the march to Far West, a distance of
fifty miles. That they failed to receive compensation as they were
promised, need hardly be mentioned.
Other Attacks by the Mob
Very much elated over their success at De Witt, the
mobbers sought other fields of conquest. The Rev. Sachiel Woods, a
Presbyterian, called the mob together and informed them that the land
sales were coming on, and if they could get the “Mormons” driven out, they
could get all the lands entitled to preemptions, and to hasten to Daviess
County in order to accomplish their object. Moreover, that the lands
purchased by the “Mormons” would again come into their hands, and they
could have both the lands and the money the “Mormons” had paid for them.
Cornelius Gilliam was also busy in Platte and Clinton Counties raising a
mob to aid Woods in this wicked scheme. These mobbers commenced to burn
the houses of the Saints and drive them from their doors, in the midst of
a snow storm on the 17th and 18th of October, 1838. Among those who were
thus deprived of shelter, was Agnes M. Smith, wife of Don Carlos Smith who
was in the mission field. She was forced to wade Grand River carrying two
small children, in the midst of inclement winter weather.
General Doniphan Orders a Defense
General Doniphan ordered out an officer with a force to
march to the scene of trouble at Adam-ondi-Ahman, but these troops were in
sympathy with the mob, and so were sent back by Doniphan, who said they
were “damned rotten hearted.” He then commanded Lieutenant Colonel George
M. Hinkle, to organize a force at Far West, and march them to Diahman,
while he would raise a force in Clay and other counties for the same
purpose. At the same time General Parks commanded Col. Lyman Wight, who
held a commission in the 59th regiment, under Parks, to collect his force
at Diahman, which was done. When the mobbers learned of the action of
these troops, they broke their camp and fled. What they could not
accomplish by force, they now hoped to gain by stratagem; therefore they
moved the goods from several of their log huts at Millport and Gallatin
and set them on fire. Then they spread the report in the country round
about that the “Mormons” had “riz” and were burning all before them.2
This action had the desired effect, and mob forces commenced to gather in
various parts of upper Missouri, and prepared for war. This evil action
was augmented by the cunning falsehoods of Samuel Bogart, Col. William P.
Peniston, Dr. Samuel Venable, and many others, who circulated affidavits
of an inflammatory nature, accusing the “Mormons” of all the wicked deeds
committed by the mob. Because of this the Saints in the various
settlements were forced to flee to Far West, seeking protection.
Battle of Crooked River
Captain Bogart, although a member of the state militia,
continued his depredations against the Saints. On the night of the 24th of
October, 1838, this reverend captain with his force went to the home of
Nathan Pinkham and took him and two other brethren prisoners, together
with some horses and arms. The word reached Far West, and Judge Elias
Higbee, the first judge of the County of Caldwell, ordered Lieutenant
Colonel Hinkle, the highest officer in the militia at Far West, to send
out a company to disperse the mobbers and release the prisoners. The
trumpet sounded in the public square about midnight and the brethren
assembled. Captain David W. Patten, was given command of a company and
ordered to go on horseback to the scene of the difficulty. The history of
what occurred is given as follows:
“Fifteen of the company were detached from the main
body while sixty continued their march till they arrived near the ford
of Crooked River, where they dismounted, tied their horses and leaving
four or five men to guard them, proceeded towards the ford, not knowing
the location of the encampment. It was just at the dawning of light in
the east, when they were marching quietly along the road, and near the
top of the hill which descends to the river, that the report of a gun
was heard, and young Patrick O’Banion reeled out of the ranks and fell
mortally wounded. Thus the work of death commenced, when Captain Patten
ordered a charge and rushed down the hill on a fast trot, and when
within about fifty yards of the camp formed a line. The mob formed a
line under the bank of the river, below their tents. It was yet so dark
that little could be seen by looking at the west, while the mob looking
towards the dawning light, could see Patten and his men, when they fired
a broadside, and three or four of the brethren fell. Captain Patten
ordered the fire returned, which was instantly obeyed, to great
disadvantage in the darkness which yet continued. The fire was repeated
by the mob, and returned by Captain Patten’s company, who gave the
watchword, ‘God and Liberty.’ Captain Patten then ordered a charge,
which was instantly obeyed. The parties immediately came in contact,
with their swords, and the mob were soon put to flight, crossing the
river at the ford, and such places as they could get a chance. In the
pursuit, one of the mob fled from behind a tree, wheeled and shot
Captain Patten who instantly fell, mortally wounded, having received a
large ball in his bowels.“The ground was soon cleared, and the brethren
gathered up a wagon or two, and making beds therein of tents, etc., took
their wounded and retreated towards Far West. Three brethren were
wounded in the bowels, one in the neck, one in the shoulder, one through
the hips, one through both thighs, one in the arm, all by musket shot.
One had his arm broken by a sword. Brother Gideon Carter was shot in the
head, and left dead on the ground so defaced that the brethren did not
know him. Bogart reported that he had lost one man. The three prisoners
were released and returned with the brethren to Far West. Captain Patten
was carried some of the way in a litter, but it caused so much distress
that he begged to be left by the way side. He was carried into Brother
Winchester’s, three miles from the city of Far West, where he died that
night. Patrick O’Banion died soon after, and Brother Carter’s body was
also brought from Crooked River, when it was discovered who he was.”3
The result of this conflict brought sorrow to the Church
at Far West. Joseph and Hyrum Smith and Lyman Wight met the brethren on
their return, at Log Creek, where they did all that could be done for
Captain Patten before his death. “Brother Patten,” said the Prophet, “was
a very worthy man, beloved by all good men who knew him. He was one of the
Twelve Apostles, and died as he had lived, a man of God, and strong in the
faith of a glorious resurrection, in a world where mobs will have no power
or place. One of his last expressions to his wife was—‘what ever you
do else, O do not deny the faith.’ How different his fate to that of the
apostate, Thomas B. Marsh, who this day vented all the lying spleen and
malice of his heart towards the work of God, in a letter to Brother and
Sister Abbot, to which was annexed an addendum by Orson Hyde.” The funeral
of Brothers Patten and O’Banion was held at Far West, Saturday, October
27, 1838. On that occasion the Prophet said of Elder Patten: “There lies a
man that has done just as he said he would—he has laid down his life
for his friends.”
Apostasy of Thomas B. Marsh
Thomas B. Marsh, President of the council of the Twelve
Apostles, suddenly left Far West in October, 1838, and went to Richmond in
an ugly mood. He had been offended over a trivial matter and thereupon
left the Church and made false accusations against his former brethren.
Orson Hyde, in the same spirit, followed him on the 18th of October. On
the 24th, Marsh went before Henry Jacobs, justice of the peace at
Richmond, and made an affidavit the gist of which is as follows:
“They have among them a company, considered true
‘Mormons,’ called the Danites, who have taken an oath to support the
heads of the Church in all things that they say or do, whether right or
wrong. Many, however, of this band are much dissatisfied with this oath,
as being against moral and religious principles. On Saturday last, I am
informed by the ‘Mormons,’ that they had a meeting at Far West at which
they appointed a company of twelve, by the name of the ‘Destruction
Company,’ for the purpose of burning and destroying, and that if the
people of Buncombe came to do mischief upon the people of Caldwell, and
committed depredations upon the ‘Mormons,’ they were to burn Buncombe;
and if the people of Clay and Ray made any movement against them, this
destroying company were to burn Liberty and Richmond. . .
. The Prophet inculcates the notion, and it is believed by every true
‘Mormon,’ that Smith’s prophecies are superior to the laws of the land.
I have heard the Prophet say that he would yet tread down his enemies,
and walk over their dead bodies; and if he was not let alone, he would
be a second Mohammed to this generation, and that he would make it one
gore of blood from the Rocky Mountains to the Atlantic Ocean; that like
Mohammed, whose motto in treating for peace was, ‘the Alcoran or the
Sword;’ so should it be eventually with us, ‘Joseph Smith or the Sword.’
These last statements were made during the last summer. The number of
armed men at Adam-ondi-Ahman was between three and four hundred.“Thomas B. Marsh.”
“Sworn to and subscribed before me, the day herein
written.“Henry Jacobs, J. P.,
“Ray County, Missouri.”
“Richmond, Missouri, October 24, 1838.”
“Affidavit of Orson Hyde”
“The most of the statements in the foregoing
disclosure I know to be true; the remainder I believe to be true.“Orson Hyde.”
“Richmond, October 24, 1838.”
“Sworn to and subscribed before me, on the day above
written.“Henry Jacobs, J. P.”4
General Atchison’s Report to Boggs
After the expulsion of the Saints from DeWitt, General
Atchison reported the condition to Governor Boggs. He informed him that
the mob was on the way to Daviess County to continue their ravages, “where
it is thought,” said the general in his communication, “the same lawless
game is to be played over, and the ‘Mormons’ to be driven from that
county, and probably from Caldwell County. Nothing, in my opinion, but the
strongest measures within the power of the executive, will put down this
spirit of mobocracy.” Again, showing the spirit of disapproval of the
course taken by the officials in the state, he wrote the governor and
said: “I do not feel disposed to disgrace myself, or permit the troops
under my command to disgrace the state and themselves by acting the part
of a mob. If the ‘Mormons’ are to be driven from their homes, let it be
done without any color of law, and in open defiance thereof; let it be
done by volunteers acting upon their own responsibilities!” This was
evidently intended as a rebuke, but it and other reports of like character
were entirely ignored by Governor Boggs, who remained true to his colors
as the advocate of mob rule.
Evil Reports
Governor Boggs preferred to believe—or more
correctly, accepted contrary to his knowledge—the evil reports which
flooded his office from the enemies of the Saints. In reporting to the
governor the siege of DeWitt, General Samuel D. Lucas, referred to the
Saints as “base and degraded beings,” who would be exterminated if they
dared to kill one of the mobbers besieging them; for such was the hatred
of the people. Lucas was one of the most bitter of the enemies of the
Church. Reverend Sashiel Woods and Joseph Dickson, October 24, 1838,
reported to the governor that “Captain Bogart and all his company,
amounting to between fifty and sixty men, were massacred by the ‘Mormons’
at Buncombe, twelve miles north of Richmond, except three.” This false
report was made about the time of the battle of Crooked River; and they
added that it might be relied on as being true that the “Mormons” expected
to lay Richmond in ashes that very morning. Their fiendish appeal ended
with these words: “We know not the hour or minute we will be laid in ashes
—our country is ruined—for God’s sake give us assistance as
quick as possible!” This was sent from Carrolton. Similar reports were
sent by Amos Rees, formerly attorney for the Church in the Jackson
trouble, and Wiley C. Williams, mobocrat, in a communication to Judge
Ryland. Judge Ryland answered and said:
“Since Mr. Morehead left Richmond, one of the company
(Bogart’s) has come in and reported that there were ten of his comrades
killed, and the remainder were taken prisoners, after many of them had
been severely wounded; he stated further that Richmond would be sacked
and burned by the “Mormon” banditti tonight. Nothing can exceed the
consternation which this news gave rise to. The women and children are
flying from Richmond in every direction. . . . My
impression is, that you had better send one of your number to Howard,
Cooper and Boone counties, in order that volunteers may be getting ready.
. . . They must make haste and put a stop to the
devastation which is menaced by these infuriated fanatics, and they must
go prepared and with the full determination to exterminate or expel them
from the state en masse. Nothing but this can
give tranquility to the public mind, and re-establish the supremacy of
the laws. There must be no further delaying with this question anywhere.
The ‘Mormons’ must leave the state, or we will, one and all, and to this
complexion it must come at last” (Documentary
History of the Church, vol. 3:172).
The Saints had no thought of making any attack on
Richmond or any other place. This Judge Ryland must have known; but he
evidently had become drunken with the bitter spirit of the times. His very
letter refutes the falsehoods contained therein.
Atchison’s False Report
Even General David R. Atchison, who previously had shown
a spirit of justice and fair play, was overcome by the lying spirits
abroad in the land. He permitted himself, under date of October 28, 1838,
after the battle of Crooked River, to join that evil genius, Samuel D.
Lucas, in a false report to Governor Boggs, as follows:
“Sir: From late outrages committed by the Mormons,
civil war is inevitable. They have set the laws of the country at
defiance, and are in open rebellion. We have about two thousand men
under arms to keep them in check. The presence of the commander-in-chief
is deemed absolutely necessary, and we most respectfully urge that your
excellency be at the seat of war as soon as possible.”“Your most obedient servants,”
“David R. Atchison, M. G. 3rd Div.”
“Samuel D. Lucas, M. G. 4th Div.”
The surprising thing is that General Atchison would
permit his name to be attached to such a document as this, which both
these officers knew perfectly well was not true. But good men are at times
overcome. Apparently he could not stand the pressure of the consolidated
effort against the Saints, who were seeking merely to defend themselves
and their rights against the aggressions of mobocracy. Nevertheless it
appeared to be a capital offense for a weak and practically defenseless
people to resist such invasion. For doing so they were guilty of causing a
state of civil war!
General Atchison’s conscience must have troubled him for
thus yielding to the mob spirit, for, later, because he manifested a
spirit of fairness towards the Saints, he was “dismounted” by the
governor, and relieved of his command.
Boggs’ Order to Clark
October 25, 1838, the Governor issued orders to General
John B. Clark to raise sufficient troops to reinstate the inhabitants of
Daviess County on their possessions, for, said he: “they [the “Mormons”]
have burnt to ashes the towns of Gallatin and Millport in said county; the
former being the county seat of said county, and including the clerk’s
office and all the public records of the county, and that there is not now
a civil officer within said county.” Two thousand men were to be raised,
in addition to those already under arms, to “restore” these people, who
had not been molested, in these towns.
The Order of Extermination
This first order to General Clark was followed by
another the following day, the report of the battle of Crooked River
having reached the ear of the governor. When he discovered that the
“Mormons” were attempting to “fight it out,” he had a great change of
heart and issued his disgraceful “exterminating order,” the greatest blot
on the escutcheon of the state of Missouri. Others among the mob, and even
officers of lesser dignity, had hinted at such a thing; but it remained
for Lilburn W. Boggs, governor of the state of Missouri, without
provocation or due investigation, to issue by authority of the great
office which he held, to the militia of that commonwealth, an order to
exterminate or drive from Missouri twelve thousand defenseless citizens
who had done no wrong. And the execution of this shameful and wicked order
was to be carried out in the dead of winter, which would bring to pass
exposure and death of delicate women and innocent children, against whom
there could have been no charge.5
A Match to the Flame
The Governor’s order soon became generally known and the
mobbers looked upon it, as well they might, as an approval of their
unlawful course. Great excitement prevailed, and mobs assembled on every
side. Marauders sallied forth, burning houses, driving off cattle,
destroying property, ravishing women and threatening with death any who
dared resist their fiendish deeds.
Notes
These houses really belonged to the Latter-day Saints who had purchased
them but had not taken possession.
4. Orson Hyde returned to the body of the Church in
June, 1839, at Commerce (Nauvoo) Illinois, and on the 27th of that month
was reinstated in the council of the twelve. He was repentant, and in
tears of humility begged forgiveness from his brethren for the unfortunate
part he had taken in this lying report with Thomas B. Marsh. He had been
overcome by the spirit of darkness and had borne false witness against his
brethren while under that influence. After his return to the Church, he
faithfully performed his part to the end. It was Orson Hyde, who, in the
life time of Joseph Smith, was intrusted with the important mission of
dedicating the land of Palestine for the return of the Jews. The
consciousness of his guilt in this unfortunate act in Missouri, preyed
upon his mind all his life, and many were the days he shed bitter tears
because that chapter in his history could not be blotted out.
Thomas B. Marsh, at a later day (1857), also returned to
the Church. On the 4th of September, 1857, he arrived in Salt Lake City
with the immigrants of William Walker’s company. He had crossed the plains
from Harrison County, Mo. Two days after his arrival he addressed a
congregation in the tabernacle and in his remarks said: “I can say, in
reference to the quorum of the twelve, to which I belonged, that I did not
consider myself a whit behind any of them, and I suppose that others had
the same opinion; but let no one feel too secure; for before you think of
it, your steps will slide. You will not then think nor feel for a moment
as you did before you lost the Spirit of Christ; for when men apostatize,
they are left to grovel in the dark. . . . But let me tell
you, my brethren and friends, if you do not want to suffer in body and
mind, as I have done; if there are any of you that have the seeds of
apostasy in you, do not let them make their appearance, but nip that
spirit in the bud; for it is misery and affliction in this world, and
destruction in the world to come” (Deseret News,
Sept. 16, 1857). He was a broken man in health and spirit and showed that
the hand of affliction had been over him. “If you want to see the fruits
of apostasy,” he would say, “look at me!” He was later ordained a high
priest.
The shadow of color for the report made by Thomas B.
Marsh and Orson Hyde, was in the fact that a Dr. Sampson Avard, who had
shortly before joined the Church, did organize a band which he called
“Danites.” These Danites did subscribe to some oath of vengeance on their
enemies. However, as soon as Joseph Smith discovered what was going on, he
put a stop to it and Avard was excommunicated.
5. The exterminating order of Governor Boggs to
General Clark is as follows:
“Sir: Since the order of
the morning to you, directing you to cause four hundred mounted men to be
raised within your division, I have received by Amos Rees, Esq., and Wiley
C. Williams, Esq., one of my aids, information of the most appalling
character, which changes the whole face of things, and places the Mormons
in the attitude of open and avowed defiance of the laws, and of having
made open war upon the people of this state. Your orders are, therefore,
to hasten your operations and endeavor to reach Richmond, in Ray County,
with all possible speed. The Mormons must be treated as enemies and must
be exterminated or driven from the state, if necessary for the public
good. Their outrages are beyond all description. If you can increase your
force, you are authorized to do so, to any extent you may think necessary.
I have just issued orders to Major-General Wallock, of Marion County, to
raise five hundred men, and to march them to the northern part of Daviess
and there to unite with General Doniphan, of Clay, who has been ordered
with five hundred men to proceed to the same point for the purpose of
intercepting the retreat of the Mormons to the north. They have been
directed to communicate with you by express; and you can also communicate
with them if you find it necessary. Instead, therefore, of proceeding as
at first directed, to reinstate the citizens of Daviess in their homes,
you will proceed immediately to Richmond, and there operate against the
Mormons. Brigadier-General Parks, of Ray, has been ordered to have four
hundred men of his brigade in readiness to join you at Richmond. The whole
force will be placed under your command.
“L. W. Boggs,”
“Governor and Commander-in-Chief.”
“To General Clark.”
Chapter 25
Clark’s Fitness for His Job
General John B. Clark was a resident of Jackson County.
So was General Samuel D. Lucas. Both assisted in driving the “Mormons”
from that county in 1833. Governor Lilburn W. Boggs was also from Jackson,
and aided in that expulsion. At that time he was lieutenant governor, and
worked secretly. These three men hated the Latter-day Saints with a mortal
hate. General Clark was not the ranking officer in the state militia in
1838, but Boggs knew, from former experiences, whom to depend upon to
execute his dastardly job. Few of the other generals, though several of
them disliked the “Mormons,” could debase themselves enough to reach the
level required to execute the governor’s inhuman decree. Clark, who
received the command, and Lucas who assisted him, were the two most fitted
to carry out the order of extermination.
The Haun’s Mill Massacre
There were a great many petty officers, and some
sectarian priests, who could descend to any level. Human butchery, if
“Mormons” were the victims, was to them but a recreation. Such a man was
Col. William O. Jennings, of the state militia. Another was Captain
Nehemiah Comstock, who served under Jennings. These “brave” men with an
armed force of characters like themselves—all from the state troops
—were assembled, at the close of the month of October, 1838, near a
small settlement of the Saints at Haun’s Mill, on Shoal Creek, about
twelve miles due east of Far West. On the 28th day of that month, a
Sunday, Jennings approached the settlement and proposed a treaty of peace.
The members of the Church located there, who were quietly minding their
own business, knew not, when they were at peace, why they should be called
on to enter into such an agreement. However, knowing the status of affairs
throughout upper Missouri, they gladly entered into such a treaty, and
continued with their domestic affairs, feeling perfectly secure. In the
meantime Col. Ashley had informed Col. Jennings of the governor’s order of
extermination. Thereupon Jennings and Nehemiah Comstock gathered their
forces, about two hundred and forty men, and immediately started for
Haun’s Mill.
Monday, October 29, 1838, passed in peace and quiet.
Tuesday the 30th was clear and pleasant, an Indian summer day. In the
afternoon, the Saints were engaged in their daily pursuits, the men in the
fields and the shops; the women attending to domestic duties, and the
children playing on the banks of the creek. Suddenly Jennings and his
force approached at full speed, riding upon the settlement. David Evans,
perceiving their evil intentions, raised his hands as a sign of peace; but
they heeded him not. Continuing their advance, they commenced to fire. The
stricken people fled, seeking shelter and endeavoring to escape. Some fled
into the thickets near their homes, and by this means escaped. For lack of
time and want of a better protection, several of the men and boys rushed
into the blacksmith shop. The cracks between the logs of the shop were so
wide that the fiends on the outside could see their victims within.
Surrounding the place, they poured volley after volley through the cracks
with deadly effect. Several intended victims rushed from the shop amidst
the fire of the mob; some escaped to the thicket; others were shot. Miss
Mary Steadwell, while fleeing, was shot in the hand and fainted; falling
over a log she remained protected by it. After the work of destruction was
over, more than twenty musket balls were discovered in the log. Yet the
executioners were principally seeking for the men, and let most of the
women escape.
After completing all the execution possible on the
outside of the shop, the ruffians pushed through the door and finished
their bloody work. The terrible scene enacted there was one of the utmost
brutality. It is told in the “History of Caldwell County,” Missouri, with
such excuses for the attack as the writers of such a history could employ.
Nevertheless the diabolical deeds of these members of the state militia,
are partly related as follows:
“Esq. Thomas McBride was an old soldier of the
Revolution. He was lying wounded and helpless, his gun by his side. A
militiaman named Rogers came up to him and demanded it. “Take it,” said
McBride. Rogers picked up the weapon, and finding that it was loaded,
deliberately discharged it into the old man’s breast. He then cut and
hacked the old veteran’s body with a rude sword, or corn knife, until it
was frightfully mangled. Wm. Reynolds, a Livingston County man, killed
the little boy Sardius Smith, 10 years of age. The lad had run into the
blacksmith shop and crawled under the bellows for safety. Upon entering
the shop the cruel militiaman discovered the cowering, trembling little
fellow, and without even demanding his surrender, fired upon and killed
him, and afterwards boasted of the atrocious deed to Charles R. Ross and
others. He described, with fiendish glee, how the poor boy struggled in
his dying agony, and justified his savage and inhuman conduct in killing
a mere child by saying, ‘Nits will make lice, and if he had lived he
would have been a Mormon.’”
The names of those killed are as follows: Thomas
McBride, Levi N. Merrick, Elias Benner, Josiah Fuller, Benjamin Lewis,
Alexander Campbell, Warren Smith, George S. Richards, William Napier,
Austin Hammer, Simeon Cox, Hiram Abbott, John York, John Lee, John Byers,
Sardius Smith and Charles Merrick. Some of these were mere children. Many
others were severely wounded but managed to escape with their lives, among
them a boy, Alma Smith, who had the flesh of his hip shot away. He had the
presence of mind to lie perfectly still and the fiends thought he was
dead. Alma was miraculously healed through prayer and faith.
After this terrible work the murderers proceeded to rob
the houses, wagons and tents, and left the widows and children who escaped
destitute of the necessities of life. They even stripped the bodies of the
slain, and carried off their booty, shouting in fiendish glee and boasting
of their deeds of blood, as though they were deeds of valor, worthy of the
greatest praise and honor.
Gathering of the Mob-Militia
The same day of the massacre at Haun’s Mill, General
Samuel D. Lucas, in command of two thousand men, arrived at Far West. With
him were Brigadier Generals Doniphan, Parks, Graham and Wilson, the latter
another ruffian. General Clark was at Chariton, under a forced march, with
the governor’s exterminating order and a force of about one thousand men.
As the troops approached Far West towards the evening of
that day, they formed in double file about one half mile from the city.
With a flag of truce they sent messengers to the city. They were met by
Captain Morey, with a few other individuals, who desired to know what the
gathering of the large armed force could mean, for as yet the “Mormon”
people had not learned of the Boggs exterminating order. To their horror
they were told that the body of troops were state militia, ordered there
by the governor, to exterminate the people and burn the place. They
demanded three persons in Far West, Adam Lightner, a non-“Mormon,” John
Cleminson, who had lost the faith, and his wife, to be brought to them.
When these three came out, the messengers told them to leave Far West at
once and save their lives, for they would be protected. The determination
of the force of militia was to destroy Far West and kill the inhabitants.
All three nobly said if the people were to be destroyed they would return
and die with them. The officers immediately returned to the camp.
Charles C. Rich was then dispatched with a flag of truce
toward the camp of militia to have an interview with Generals Atchison and
Doniphan, who in the past had shown some sympathy for the “Mormons.” On
his way he was fired at by Captain Bogart. Nevertheless, he continued on
his way and was granted the interview with Doniphan, who informed him that
General Atchison had been “dismounted” a few miles back, by order of the
governor, for being too merciful to the “Mormons.” He then plead with
Doniphan to use his influence to protect the city from an attack, at least
until the following morning. Doniphan replied that the governor had
ordered the extermination of the “Mormons,” but his order had not arrived,
and until it did there would be no attack upon the Saints. However, he
could not vouch for the action of Cornelius Gilliam’s company, which had
just arrived, painted and decorated as Indians; their commander styling
himself the “Delaware Chief.” These savages spent the night in making
hideous yells and other disturbances. When Charles C. Rich returned to Far
West and reported, Col. George M. Hinkle, who commanded the forces at Far
West, sent another messenger to the mob-militia to plead for the lives of
the people. He returned without a satisfactory answer and reported that he
had learned that several members of the Church had been captured by some
of the troops, and had been brutally murdered, with no one to raise a
voice in protest.
During the night the Saints made such temporary
fortification as they were able and with grim determination prepared to
fight the best they could to the last, being outnumbered more than five to
one. Recruits were hourly joining the forces of their enemies. Among these
came Col. Jennings and his band, fresh from the great “victory” at Haun’s
Mill. The Saints spent an anxious night in solemn supplication to the
Lord. The women gathered such few loose articles as might be carried, and
prepared for flight if the chance was offered them. Lyman Wight, with a
small force, came from Adam-ondi-Ahman and succeeded in gaining Far West
during the night.
The Siege of Far West
Early on the morning of the 31st, Col. Hinkle sent
another messenger to General Doniphan. When he returned he stated that
Doniphan had said that the governor’s order had arrived and Lucas was
preparing to carry it out. “He would be damned, if he would obey the
order,” was the report, “but Lucas could do as he pleased.”
The army, while encamped, permitted no person to go out
or come in the city. Those who attempted it were shot at. Corn fields were
destroyed and cattle, sheep and hogs wantonly killed by members of the
mob-militia.
Colonel Hinkle’s Treachery
About eight o’clock Col. Hinkle sought another
interview, this time with General Lucas, to learn if some compromise could
not be arranged to avoid a battle. Lucas promised to meet him with a flag
of truce at two o’clock. At the time appointed the interview was held.
Hinkle, John Corrill, who had within the past few weeks become
disaffected, William W. Phelps and a Captain Morrison, met with Lucas and
his aids when the following propositions were presented to Col. Hinkle for
acceptance in behalf of the “Mormons:”
“To give up their leaders to be
tried and punished.“To make an appropriation of their
property, all who had taken up arms, to the payment of their debts and
indemnity for damage done by them.“That the balance should leave the
state, and be protected out by the militia, but to be permitted to remain
under protection until further orders were received from the
Commander-in-Chief.“To give up the arms of every
description, to be receipted for.”
At least, these were the terms according to the report
Lucas made to Governor Boggs. What else he may have said is not on record.
To these terms Col. Hinkle agreed, but asked to be given until the next
day to comply with them. Lucas consented to this on the condition that
Joseph Smith, Sidney Rigdon, Lyman Wight, Parley P. Pratt and George W.
Robinson be turned over to the camp of the militia as hostages. If in the
morning Hinkle failed to comply with the terms, these men would be
returned to Far West, and the attack should commence on the city. If he
did comply, then these brethren, among others, should be retained as
prisoners to be tried. Hinkle returned to Far West and reported to Joseph
Smith that the officers of the state militia desired an interview with the
brethren mentioned, hoping that the difficulties might be settled without
carrying out the exterminating order. Said Parley P. Pratt: “We had no
confidence in the word of a murderer and robber; but there was no
alternative, but to put ourselves into the hands of such monsters, or to
have the city sacked, and men, women and children massacred. We therefore
commended ourselves to the Lord, and voluntarily surrendered.” As they
approached the camp in compliance with this order, General Lucas, with a
guard of several hundred men, rode up, and with a haughty air ordered his
men to surround the brethren. Colonel Hinkle was heard to say: “General,
these are the prisoners I agreed to deliver up.” The prisoners were then
marched into the camp surrounded by several thousand savage looking
soldiers. “These all set up a constant yell,” says Brother Pratt, “like so
many bloodhounds let loose upon their prey. . . . If the
vision of the infernal regions could suddenly be opened to the mind, with
thousands of malicious fiends, all clamoring, exulting, deriding,
blaspheming, mocking, railing, raging and foaming like a troubled sea,
then could some idea be formed of the hell which we had entered.”
The prisoners were placed under a strong guard and
forced to remain without shelter during the night in inclement winter
weather. The guard blasphemed; mocked the Savior; demanded miracles and
said: “Come, Smith, show us an angel; give us one of your revelations;
show us a miracle; come, there is one of your brethren in camp whom we
took prisoner yesterday in his own house, and knocked his brains out with
his own rifle, which we found hanging over his fire place; he lies
speechless and dying;1 speak the word and heal him, and then we
will all believe; or, if you are apostles or men of God deliver
yourselves, and then we will be “Mormons.”2
Condemned to be Shot
Thursday morning, November 1, 1838, Hyrum Smith and
Amasa Lyman were brought by Col. Hinkle into the camp. That night a court
martial was held, at which, besides the commanding officers of the
mob-militia, Col. Hinkle, Judge Austin A. King, District Attorney Birch,
and the Reverends Sashiel Woods, Bogart and several other priests, played
a part. The prisoners were sentenced to be shot on the public square in
Far West, Friday morning at 9 o’clock. This was, let it be said to their
honor, over the protest of Generals Doniphan and Graham, and perhaps a few
others. General Doniphan was given the order to carry out the execution.
It was a most fortunate thing that he was selected, for he refused to obey
the command. The order given him was as follows:
“Brigadier General Doniphan:
“Sir: You will take Joseph
Smith and the other prisoners into the public square of Far West, and
shoot them at 9 o’clock tomorrow morning.”“Samuel D. Lucas,”
“Major General Commanding.”
General Doniphan replied to this order by saying to his
superior:
“It is cold blooded murder. I will not obey your
order. My brigade shall march for Liberty tomorrow morning at 8 o’clock;
and if you execute these men, I will hold you responsible before an
earthly tribunal, so help me God.”“A. W. Doniphan,”
“Brigadier General.”
Although this was an act of insubordination, it
frightened the criminal general and his willing aids. No charge was ever
made against Doniphan, for they dared not make one.
Plundering of the Militia
Col. Hinkle, according to his agreement, marched the
militia companies at Far West out of the city and grounded their arms,
which were the private property of the men who held them. Then the mob
force was let loose. They entered the city without restraint, on pretext
of searching the homes for additional arms. They tore up floors; ruined
furniture; destroyed property; whipped the men and forced them to sign
deeds to their property at the point of the bayonet; and violated the
chastity of women, until their victims died. About eighty men were taken
prisoners and the people were ordered to leave the state, and were
forbidden, under threat of death, to assemble more than three in a place.
Notwithstanding all this, General Lucas reported to the governor how
orderly and decorous were his troops.
Prisoners Taken to Independence
The prisoners after an earnest appeal, were permitted to
visit their homes, under a strong guard, to obtain a change of clothing.
They were, however, given strict command not to speak, or enter into
conversation with the members of their families. When the Prophet visited
his home the children clung to his garments. He requested the privilege of
a private interview with his family, which was denied him. Hyrum Smith,
whose wife less than two weeks later was confined,3 drew attention
to the condition in his home; but received in answer only gibes and
insults. Parley P. Pratt underwent a similar scene, and in the anguish of
his soul appealed to General Moses Wilson, who answered him with an
exultant laugh, and a taunting reproach.
After these painful scenes, the prisoners were started
for Independence, under a strong guard commanded by Generals Lucas and
Wilson. On the way orders came from General Clark to have the prisoners
sent to him, but this General Lucas was not willing to do. Clark, without
question, wanted the honor of putting the prisoners to death. Through his
vanity, Lucas wanted to exhibit them before their enemies in Jackson
County, and pose as a great hero in triumph. Between the rivalry of the
two, not forgetting the hand of the Lord which was over them, their lives
were spared.4
Prisoners in Richmond
On the 3rd of November, 1838, the prisoners arrived in
Jackson County and the next day were taken by order of General Lucas, to
Independence. General Clark, however, would not permit them to stay,
desiring to gain possession of them himself. Therefore, he sent Col.
Sterling Price with instructions to have them removed immediately to
Richmond, Ray County. They arrived in Richmond on the 9th, and were
imprisoned in a vacant house. On their way they met General Clark, and
asked him why they had been carried from their homes and what the charges
were against them. Clark said he was not then able to determine, but would
be prepared to tell in a short time. When they were confined Clark sent
Price with two chains and padlocks and had the prisoners fastened
together. The windows were then nailed down; the prisoners were searched
and the only weapons they had (their pocket knives) were taken away. While
this was going on armed guards stood with cocked guns pointed at them.
Here the brethren were kept many days awaiting trial.
Rebuking the Guards
While incarcerated in this prison, the brethren were
guarded by some of the vilest wretches that could be found, who spent
their time in the presence of their prisoners relating their horrible
deeds of wickedness. This thing continued for some time, when the Prophet,
unable to stand it any longer, arose and rebuked them. The occurrence is
graphically related by Elder Parley P. Pratt in the following words:
“During this time Elder Rigdon was taken very sick,
from hardship and exposure, and finally lost his reason; but still he
was kept in a miserable, noisy and cold room, and compelled to sleep on
the floor with a chain and padlock round his ankle, and fastened to six
others. Here he endured the constant noise and confusion of an unruly
guard, the officer of which was Colonel Sterling Price, since governor
of the State.“These guards were composed generally of the most
noisy, foul-mouthed, vulgar, disgraceful rabble that ever defiled the
earth. . . . Mrs. Robinson, a young and delicate female,
with her infant, came down to see her husband [George W. Robinson], and
to comfort and take care of her father [Sidney Rigdon] in his sickness.
When she first entered the room, amid the clank of chains and the rattle
of weapons, and cast her eyes on her sick and dejected parent and
sorrow-worn husband, she was speechless, and only gave vent to her
feelings in a flood of tears. This faithful lady, with her little
infant, continued by the side of her father till he recovered from his
sickness, and till his fevered and disordered mind resumed its wonted
powers.“In one of those tedious nights we had lain as if in
sleep till the hour of midnight had passed, and our ears and hearts had
been pained, while we had listened for hours to the obscene jests, the
horrid oaths, the dreadful blasphemies and filthy language of our
guards, Colonel Price at their head, as they recounted to each other
their deeds of rapine, murder, robbery, etc., which they had committed
among the ‘Mormons’ while at Far West and vicinity. They even boasted of
defiling by force wives, daughters, and virgins, and of shooting or
dashing out the brains of men, women and children.“I had listened till I became so disgusted, shocked,
horrified, and so filled with the spirit of indignant justice that I
could scarcely refrain from rising upon my feet and rebuking the guards;
but had said nothing to Joseph, or any one else, although I lay next to
him and knew he was awake. On a sudden he arose to his feet, and spoke
in a voice of thunder, or as the roaring lion, uttering, as near as I
can recollect, the following words:“SILENCE, ye fiends of the
infernal pit. In the name of Jesus Christ I rebuke you, and command you
to be still. I will not live another minute and hear such language.
Cease such talk, or you or I die THIS INSTANT!
Majesty in Chains
“He ceased to speak. He stood erect in terrible
majesty. Chained, and without a weapon; calm, unruffled and dignified as
an angel, he looked upon the quailing guards; whose weapons were lowered
or dropped to the ground, whose knees smote together, and who, shrinking
into a corner, or crouching at his feet, begged his pardon, and remained
quiet till a change of guards.“I have seen the ministers of justice, clothed in
magisterial robes, and criminals arraigned before them, while life was
suspended on a breath, in the courts of England; I have witnessed a
Congress in solemn session to give laws to nations; I have tried to
conceive of kings, of royal courts, of thrones and crowns; and of
emperors assembled to decide the fate of kingdoms; but dignity and
majesty have I seen but once, as it stood in chains, at midnight, in a
dungeon in an obscure village of Missouri.”5
General Clark at Far West
In the meantime (November 4), General Clark arrived at
Far West with 1600 men, and 500 more on the outskirts of the city. He
ordered General Lucas to send to Adam-ondi-Ahman and there take all the
“Mormon” men prisoners and secure their property, till the best means
could be adopted for paying damages due to the mob troubles. On the 5th,
Clark ordered all the men at Far West to form in line, when the names of
fifty-six were called and they were made prisoners to await trial for
something which was not defined. On the 6th, he again gathered the male
portion of the population and read to them a written address which he had
prepared.
His Harangue
Feeling safe in the presence of so many helpless men,
and flanked by his troops, he made bold to impress upon the brethren the
enormity of their crimes. He read to them a number of stipulations to
which they must comply. The first, second and third, to the effect that
they must surrender their leading men, deliver their arms, and sign over
their properties to defray expenses of the “war.” This, he said, they had
done. The fourth is here repeated:
“Another article yet remains for you to comply with,
and that is, that you leave the state forthwith; and whatever may be
your feelings concerning this, or whatever your innocence, it is nothing
to me; General Lucas, who is equal in authority with me, has made this
treaty with you—I approve of it—I should have done the same
had I been here. I am therefore determined to see it fulfilled. The
character of this state has suffered almost beyond redemption, from the
character, conduct and influence that you have exerted, and we deem it
an act of justice to restore her character to its former standing among
the states, by every proper means.“The orders of the governor to me were that you should
be exterminated, and not allowed to remain in the state, and had your
leaders not been given up, and the terms of the treaty complied with,
before this, you and your families would have been destroyed and your
houses in ashes.“There is a discretionary power vested in my hands
which I shall exercise in your favor for a season; for this lenity you
are indebted to my clemency. I do not say that you shall go now, but you
must not think of staying here another season or of putting in crops,
for the moment you do this the citizens will be upon you. If I am called
here again, in case of a non-compliance of a treaty made, do not think
that I shall act any more as I have done—you need not expect any
mercy, but extermination, for I am determined the governor’s order shall
be executed. As for your leaders, do not once think—do not imagine
for a moment—do not let it enter your mind that they will be
delivered, or that you will see their faces again, for their fate is fixed—their die is cast—their doom is
sealed.”
He then very graciously pleaded with them, and invoked
the “Great Spirit, the unknown God,” to make them sufficiently intelligent
to break the chains of superstition, that they no longer worship man, and
never again organize with bishops, presidents, etc., but to become like
other men.
Trial in Daviess County
About this time Governor Boggs wrote General Clark to
hold a military court in Daviess County, and try those “guilty of the late
outrages, committed towards the inhabitants of said county.” He was
desirous of having the whole matter “settled completely, if possible”
before the forces should be disbanded. “If the ‘Mormons’ are disposed,”
said Boggs, “voluntarily to leave the state, of course it would be
advisable in you to promote that object, in any way deemed proper. The
ringleaders of this rebellion, though, ought by no means to be permitted
to escape the punishment they merit.” General Robert Wilson was detailed
to Daviess County to take possession of the prisoners. All the men in the
town of Adam-ondi-Ahman were placed under arrest, and a court of inquiry
instituted with the mobber Adam Black on the bench. Notwithstanding this,
after three days of examination, Black acquitted them all. No one knew
better than he of their innocence.
The Charges Against Joseph Smith and Companions
General Clark spent some time searching the laws to find
some authority by which the Prophet and companions could be tried for
treason by court martial. He even sent to Fort Leavenworth seeking such
information, which could not be found. It caused him extreme annoyance
that no law could be invoked to try private citizens by military code when
there was no war. He knew some charges would have to be preferred against
the accused, so he wrote the governor saying he had, on November 10, 1838,
made out charges against the prisoners and had called Judge Austin A. King
to try them as a committing court. He also suggested that they be tried by
court martial, especially, said he, should Joseph Smith be so tried, but
he could not discover authority for such procedure, and requested the
opinion of the attorney general on that point. “There being no civil
officers in Caldwell,” he said, “I have to use the military to get
witnesses from there, which I do without reserve.” The civil officers in
Caldwell, being “Mormons” had all been cast into jail, and of course were
not available. He closed his epistle by saying the accused brethren were
guilty of “treason, murder, arson, burglary, robbery, larceny, and
perjury.” The reply he received was to turn the prisoners over to the
civil law, which order hurt him very much, for he hoped to have the
pleasure of attending to their execution, after a military trial. In fact,
he and Lucas had on several occasions set the date of execution, but the
hand of the Lord was always over the afflicted brethren.
The Trial
Monday, November 12, 1838, Judge King sent out armed men
to obtain witnesses, some of whom came and testified willingly to
falsehoods; others came reluctantly. Among the witnesses who testified
against the brethren were: Dr. Sampson Avard, originator of the “Danites,”
who, later, was excommunicated from the Church for the offense; John
Corrill, George M. Hinkle, Reed Peck, John Cleminson, Burr Riggs, William
W. Phelps, John Whitmer, and others who formerly belonged to the Church.
The testimony of the prosecution continued until the 18th. Then the court
called for witnesses for the defense; forty or more names were given, and
the Reverend-Captain Rogart was dispatched with a company of militia to
get them. He got them and brought them, not to the court, but to prison,
and confined them there. During the week, the judge taunted the brethren
because no witnesses appeared in their defense. Other names were given,
and the same reverend-captain was sent for them. He did not find many, for
the witnesses, learning what had happened to their fellows, could not be
found. The few he did discover he also brought and cast behind the bars.
In this manner the mock trial proceeded from day to day. On the 24th,
twenty-three of the defendants were released, and by the 28th all the
others were acquitted or admitted to bail, excepting the following: Joseph
Smith, Sidney Rigdon, Hyrum Smith, Lyman Wight, Caleb Baldwin and
Alexander McRae, who were ordered to be taken to Liberty, Clay County, and
there committed to stand trial on the various charges named; Parley P.
Pratt, Morris Phelps, Luman Gibbs, Darwin Chase and Norman Shearer, who
were taken to Richmond Jail, there also to await trial for the same
“crimes.”
Nature of the Testimony
Some of the witnesses testified that the Church was a
temporal kingdom, which would, according to the teachings of its leaders,
eventually “fill the whole earth and subdue all other kingdoms.” The
seventh chapter of Daniel was referred to several times. The brethren were
asked by the judge if they believed in Daniel’s prophecy and when they
answered in the affirmative, Judge King turning to his clerk said: “Write
that down; it is a strong point for treason.” The defendants’ attorneys,
Doniphan and Rees, protested saying, “Judge, you had better make the Bible
treason.” These attorneys advised their clients not to make any defense or
attempt to furnish other witnesses, for it was useless. Doniphan observed
that if a cohort of angels were to come down, and declare the prisoners
innocent, it would all be the same, for Judge King had determined from the
beginning to cast them into prison.
Malinda Porter, Delia F. Pine, Nancy Rigdon, Jonathan W.
Barlow, Thoret Parson, Ezra Chipman and Arza Judd, Jr., volunteered to
testify for the defense, but were prevented from giving testimony
favorable to the accused at the point of the bayonet.
November 29, 1838, Joseph Smith and fellow prisoners
were committed to the keeping of the sheriff of Clay County, who took them
to Liberty and cast them in prison. Parley P. Pratt and fellows were
likewise retained in Richmond, and thus ended this “trial” before Judge
King.
Notes
This was a brother named Carey, who had been beaten over the head
until his brains oozed out. He died shortly afterwards, having been
exposed in that condition without shelter, all afternoon and night.
Autobiography of Parley P. Pratt, p. 204.
During these trying scenes, November 13, 1838, while Hyrum Smith,
with the Prophet and the other prisoners, were incarcerated, Joseph
Fielding Smith, who afterwards became President of the Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter-day Saints, was born at Far West. When he was but a few
days old, members of this mob-militia entered the home, ransacked it, and
turned the bedding, on which the infant lay, upside down, smothering him
until his life was apparently gone when he was discovered.
Parley P. Pratt declared that General Wilson made the following
statement: “It was repeatedly insinuated, by the other officers and
troops, that we should hang you prisoners on the first tree we came to on
the way to Independence. But I’ll be d—d if anybody shall hurt you.
We just intend to exhibit you in Independence, and let the people look at
you, and see what a d—d set of fine fellows you are. And, more
particularly, to keep you from that old bigot of a general, Clark, and his
troops, from down county, who are so stuffed with lies and prejudice, that
they would shoot you down in a moment.”
Autobiography of Parley P. Pratt, pages 228
–9.
Chapter 26
The Case Before the Legislature
In December, 1838, the Legislature of Missouri met.
Governor Boggs laid before that body the information in his hands relative
to the difficulty with the Latter-day Saints. This information was
woefully lacking in the matter of the petitions and documents sent to him
in defense of the Saints. On the 10th of that month Brigham Young, Heber
C. Kimball, John Taylor and other brethren petitioned the legislature,
setting forth their side of the case. This petition was presented to David
R. Atchison and others, December 17. The following day Mr. Turner, from a
joint committee, presented before the senate a report of findings, based
on the governor’s information. This report stated that the evidence was
“not authenticated,” and was confined chiefly to investigation of criminal
charges against individuals under arrest; the evidence was ex parte; and without aid of further evidence, the
committee could not form a satisfactory opinion in relation to the
material points. For these reasons, and because “it would be a direct
interference with the administration of justice, the committee reported
that this document ought not to be published, with the sanction of the
legislature.” December 19, the petition of the brethren was presented by
John Corrill, who had but recently departed from the Church. It was read
in profound silence, but at the close of the reading, the house was in an
uproar. A Mr. Childs, of Jackson County, denounced the petition saying
there was not a word of truth in it. Mr. Ashley, of Livingstone County,
denounced the “Mormons” as did also Mr. Young, of Lafayette. Ashley was
one of the murderers at Haun’s Mill, and even boasted of that slaughter
before the house. Mr. Redman, of Howard County, and Mr. Gyer, of St.
Louis, and a few other members, demanded a full investigation, for they
believed there was truth in the petition, and the actions of those members
in opposing an investigation was because they feared their evil deeds
might be brought to light. The result of it all was that the petition was
laid on the table, “until the 4th day of July next,”—Independence
day. January 16, 1839, Mr. Turner introduced in the senate a bill “to
provide for the investigation of the late disturbances in this state.” The
bill passed the senate, but when it came to the house (Feb. 4) it followed
the petition and was laid on the table, also to be taken up on
Independence day. Many considered this an approval of the wrongs committed
on the “Mormons” in Missouri. David R. Atchison and a few others
vigorously protested against such criminal action, but found themselves in
the minority, for the motion prevailed by a majority of eleven votes.
Legislative Appropriations
In December, the legislature of Missouri appropriated
two thousand dollars “to be distributed among the people of Daviess and
Caldwell Counties.” The “good” people of Daviess were very “generous” and
felt that they could do without their portion of this appropriation, and
let it be given to the people of Caldwell. They could well afford to do
such a thing, for they had robbed the “Mormon” people of nearly all they
possessed. They had ransacked their homes and carried off their household
furniture and goods, and otherwise enriched themselves at the expense of
the Saints who had dwelt among them. This sum, so it was pretended, was
distributed among the people in Caldwell. Judge Cameron and others
attended to the “distribution.” The way they did it was to drive off the
hogs belonging to the “Mormons” and shoot them, and without further
bleeding, cut them up and deliver them to the Saints, at four or five
cents a pound. They also “gave them a few calicos,” and the “sweepings of
an old store,” charging them an extra price for the goods, and thus was
the “munificient” sum of two thousand dollars distributed among the
“Mormons.” Later the same legislature appropriated two hundred thousand
dollars to pay the troops for their work in driving the “Mormons” from the
state. In this manner were law and justice administered in Missouri in the
years 1838 and 1839.
Extent of “Mormon” Losses
The total value of the property destroyed in Missouri,
which belonged to the Saints, is beyond our knowledge. It was estimated to
be not less than two million dollars, from the time they first settled in
that state until their expulsion. About twelve hundred members of the
Church were driven from Jackson County in 1833, and all their property was
lost to them. When again they were forced to leave Clay County, though
they went peaceably at the request of the other citizens, they left behind
them a vast amount of property for which no remuneration was ever
received. When they were expelled from the state in the winter of 1838
–9, the Saints numbered between twelve and fifteen thousand souls.
All their property, except the little they were able to gather hastily and
carry with them, was either destroyed or stolen by their enemies. In the
appeal made to Congress and the President of the United States, in 1839,
the amount of their losses was estimated at two million dollars. Claims
against Missouri for the losses were presented to Congress in the sum of
$1,381,044.00, and this represented only 491 individuals; many others who
lost property, entered no claims for damages against that state.
In addition to this loss of property, the Prophet Joseph
paid in lawyers’ fees, for the defense of the people and himself, against
the unhallowed persecutions of their enemies, about fifty thousand
dollars; with very little benefit in return. And for all this, the
generous state of Missouri, for a show before the world of their charity
and kindness toward the people they had robbed, could afford to
appropriate the magnificent sum of two thousand dollars! And what of the
blood of men, women and children which had been shed by these human fiends?
In Liberty Prison
After the mock trial in Richmond, Joseph Smith and his
five companions were imprisoned in Liberty, Clay County, for a period of
six months. Here they suffered, during that time, many untold hardships.
Much of the time they were bound in chains. Their food was often not fit
to eat, and never wholesome or prepared with the thought of proper
nourishment. Several times poison was administered to them in their food,
which made them sick nigh unto death, and only the promised blessings of
the Lord saved them. Their bed was on the floor, or on the flat side of a
hewn white oak log, and in this manner they were forced to suffer. Is it
any wonder that they cried in the anguish of their souls unto the Lord,
for relief from such inhuman treatment?
Epistles From Prison
The Lord did not forsake them. While they were confined,
the brethren wrote a number of communications to the Saints. Occasionally
their friends were privileged to visit them, but always in the presence of
a strong and heavily armed guard. Letters with words of comfort were
occasionally received, and in this way their spirits were buoyed up, which
enabled them to stand their trials. On March 25, 1839, an epistle of
special import was written from the prison to the Saints scattered abroad,
and to the bishop, Edward Partridge, in particular. This epistle portrayed
many of their grievances and expressed their love and fellowship for the
Saints. Above all this, however, they poured out their souls to the Lord
asking for relief, and wondering why they were so severely punished. The
Lord gave them answer which comforted them and built them up in hope. They
also received encouragement, and assurance of their delivery from bonds,
which was soon to come to pass.1
Release of Sidney Rigdon
The Prophet wrote in his Journal that January 1, 1839,
“dawned upon us as prisoners of hope, but not as sons of liberty. O
Columbia, Columbia! How thou art fallen! ‘The land of the free, the home
of the brave!’ ‘The asylum of the oppressed’—oppressing thy noblest
sons, in a loathsome dungeon, without any provocation, only that they have
claimed to worship the God of their fathers according to his own word, and
the dictates of their own consciences.” Elder Parley P. Pratt and his
companions in tribulation were still held in bondage in their doleful
prison in Richmond. The brethren appealed to the supreme court in Missouri
for a writ of habeas corpus. Twice their petition was denied. They also
petitioned the judges of the county for like privileges, and sent a
memorial to the legislature asking that they be granted a fair and
impartial trial before an unprejudiced judge in some other circuit, where
they might have hope of justice, which could not be obtained from Judge
King. Finally, in the latter part of February, 1839, they prevailed on
Judge Turnham, one of the county judges, who granted their request after
some reluctance. The judge was afraid of the mob, for the threats were
made by the members of the banditti, that if any judge, jury or court of
any kind, should free the prisoners they would be killed. Great
threatenings were made at the time of this trial, and the brethren would
have been liberated, only for the blundering, wilfully or ignorantly, of
their lawyers. Sidney Rigdon, who had suffered terribly because of
exposure and the ill-treatment he had received, he being much older and
less able to endure than the other brethren, was released by the action of
the judge, at this time. Through a kindness on the part of the sheriff,
Samuel Hadley, and the jailer, Samuel Tillery, he was let out of prison in
the night, for fear of the mob, and told to make his way out of the state
as soon as he could. Even as it was, he was pursued by a body of armed
men; but having a good start made his way to Quincy, Illinois.
Departure for Daviess
The refusal on the part of the courts and officials to
grant a final trial—for it should be remembered the brethren were
being held on a preliminary hearing all these months—and the
threatenings of numerous enemies caused the brethren to determine on
making their escape if possible. Once they tried and failed. Again the
opportunity presented itself, and the Lord indicated to them that if they
were united they could gain their freedom, but the stubbornness of Lyman
Wight defeated their purpose. The latter part of March, Elders Heber C.
Kimball and Theodore Turley went to Jefferson City with necessary papers,
to see the governor, but he was absent. However, they saw the secretary of
state, who appeared astonished at the action of Judge King, and who wrote
the judge a letter. They also saw the supreme court judges, but due to the
blundering of their attorney, Doniphan, they were unable to obtain a writ
of habeas corpus. They returned to Liberty on the 30th of March. April 4,
they had an interview with Judge Austin A. King, who was angry to think
they had been to see the governor. King said he could have done all that
they desired, and would have signed their petition if he had been
approached, for all the prisoners, but Joseph Smith, “and he was not fit
to live.” Fearing that the brethren might obtain a change of venue, Judge
King hurried off with them, April 6, 1839, to Daviess County, where he
hoped to continue his persecution. Perhaps he hoped they would be
murdered, for a band of fifty men in Daviess County, on learning that the
prisoners were coming, took an oath that they would neither eat nor drink
until they had murdered the Prophet. The prisoners arrived at Gallatin,
April 8, and the following day the examination of witnesses commenced
before the grand jury, over which Judge King acted as the presiding judge.
Judge Birch, the county judge, who previously assisted in the prosecution
of the brethren, was associated with him. Both judges and jury were drunk
while the case proceeded, and the men of the jury were members of the
raiding party of Haun’s Mill. They served on the jury during the day and
as guards at night, and in their drunken debauchery boasted of their many
crimes. On the 11th of April, they brought in a “true bill” against the
prisoners for “murder, treason, burglary, arson, larceny, theft and
stealing.”
A Change of Venue
On April 15, 1839, the brethren obtained from Judge
Birch a change of venue from Daviess to Boone County, and a mittimus was
made out by him without date, name or place. The prisoners were fitted out
with a two-horse wagon, necessary horses, and four men besides the
sheriff, to guard them to Boone County. The prisoners numbered five, as
follows: Joseph Smith, Hyrum Smith, Lyman Wight, Caleb Baldwin, and
Alexander McRae. They started from Gallatin in the afternoon and went as
far as Diahman, where they camped for the night at Judge Morin’s. The next
day they went about twenty miles where a jug of whiskey was procured, and
all of the guards, save one, got drank and went to bed. The sheriff showed
the prisoners the mittimus and said to them that Judge Birch told him
never to carry them to Boone County, and never to show the mittimus, and,
the sheriff said: “I shall take a good drink of whiskey and go to bed, and
you may do as you are a mind to.”
The Escape
The prisoners bought from the guards two of the horses,
paying for one with clothing, and giving their note for the other. After
four of the guards had retired and were asleep in drunken slumber, the
fifth helped them to saddle the horses and started them on their way. Two
of the brethren mounted and three went on foot, changing places from time
to time. Said Hyrum Smith, “we took our change of venue for the state of
Illinois, and in the course of nine or ten days arrived at Quincy, Adams
County.” They found their families in good health, but in a state of
poverty due to their persecutions and expulsion from Missouri’s soil.
A “Concocted Plan”
Samuel Tillery, the jailer at Liberty, told the
prisoners that the persecutions against the Saints was a “concocted plan,”
framed by the various officers who took part in it, from the governor
down. It was first planned in the fore part of the year 1838, but was not
fully carried out until the militia was sent down against the Saints in
Caldwell and Daviess Counties. “But,” said Tillery, shortly before the
removal of the brethren to Daviess County from Liberty Prison, “you need
not be concerned, for the governor has laid a plan for your release.” He
also said that the governor was now ashamed enough of the whole
transaction, and would be glad to set the prisoners at liberty, if he
dared to do it. Without question the conspirators became alarmed. They did
not plan the escape of the Prophet and associates because of any
repentance, or remorse of conscience, but because of the fear of public
sentiment, without as well as within the state. Knowledge of the dastardly
actions of the officers of Missouri, who were pledged by oath to uphold
and honor their constitution, which grants liberty to all citizens2
in their religious worship, spread abroad into other
commonwealths. The citizens of western Illinois received the exiled Saints
with open arms, and invited them to make their homes among them. The
governor of Iowa, Robert Lucas, wrote and spoke in a vehement manner in
opposition to the treatment the “Mormon” people received in Missouri. He
invited the Saints to make their homes within the borders of the territory
of Iowa. All these things had their effect on the assassins in Missouri,
and caused them to fear and tremble. Governor Boggs, himself, became sick
of the reproach brought upon the state, and reached the point where he
would have gladly released Joseph Smith and his fellow prisoners, but
feared that such an action would properly be interpreted as an
acknowledgment of his unlawful course. He preferred to have it so arranged
that they could escape and appear before the world as fugitives from
justice.
Escape of Parley P. Pratt
At the time Joseph Smith and his companions were sent to
Liberty, Elders Parley P. Pratt, Morris Phelps, Luman Gibbs, Norman
Shearer and Darwin Chase, were sent to Richmond, to await trial on the
same charges. Here they suffered many untold hardships and deprivations in
their dungeon, until April 24, 1839, a period of six months, when they
were taken before the grand jury in Ray County, for a hearing of their
case. The same notorious Judge Austin A. King presided at the
deliberations of this body. Norman Shearer and Darwin Chase, who were only
boys, were released, and King Follett, an aged man, was added to the list
of prisoners. A change of venue having been granted them, the brethren
were taken to Columbia, Boone County, and again cast into prison. In the
meantime Luman Gibbs apostatized, hoping to gain his liberty, but the
crafty officers, although they treated him with improved consideration,
still kept him in prison to act as a spy on his former brethren. July 4,
1839, Elders Pratt, Phelps and Follett, assisted on the outside by Orson
Pratt and a young man named John W. Clark, a brother-in-law of Elder
Phelps, escaped in a very thrilling and novel manner. Elder Follett was
re-captured, but the other two made their way, after many hardships and
difficulties, to Illinois and the presence of their families. Elder
Follett was again cast into prison and bound in chains, but in course of a
month or two was dismissed, no charge having been proved against him.
Departure of the Exiles
With all three members of the First Presidency in
prison, the burden of removing the Saints from Missouri was placed on the
shoulders of President Brigham Young, of the council of the apostles. A
public meeting was held at Far West, January 26, 1839, and a committee
composed of the following brethren was selected to draft resolutions and
consider means for the removal of the Saints from Missouri: Brigham Young,
Heber C. Kimball, John Taylor, Alanson Ripley, Theodore Turley, John Smith
and Don Carlos Smith. This committee went to work gathering such means as
could be obtained, and devising plans for the removal of the poor. Later a
committee on removal was appointed with the following members: William
Huntington, chairman; Charles Bird, Alanson Ripley, Theodore Turley,
Daniel Shearer, Shadrack Roundy and Jonathan H. Hale. During the winter
months the exodus began, and many of the Saints gathered at Quincy,
Illinois, where they received a kindly welcome. Due to their extreme
poverty—for they had been robbed and plundered—many of the
members of the Church were unable to get away before the spring of 1839.
April arrived, and the vicious mobocrats met in council on the 6th, and
determined that all the “Mormons” should be out of Caldwell County by the
12th of that month. All available teams were secured, and help was
solicited from the members of the Church who were already in Illinois, and
the remaining Saints at Far West began their journey from Missouri. Thirty
families were removed into Tenney’s Grove, twenty-five miles from Far
West, by the 14th of April, on their way to Quincy. Most of the committee
remained at Far West until the last. President Brigham Young was forced to
leave about the middle of February, to save his life from the angry
Missourians who sought it. From the Illinois side he directed the location
of the Saints.
Thursday, April 18, 1839, Elder Heber C. Kimball
notified the members of the committee on removal to wind up their affairs
at once, and be off, for their lives were in grave danger. An armed force
went to the home of Theodore Turley to shoot him; similar action was taken
against other members of the committee, and a number of mobbers tried to
kill Heber C. Kimball in the streets of Far West. The members of the
Church had now departed; many went by way of Richmond and the Missouri
River to Quincy. The members of the committee who still remained, were
given one hour to get out of the place. Hurriedly gathering up such
articles as they could take with them, they departed. The mobbers then
commenced to loot the homes, which had not already been looted of all they
contained.
Governor Boggs and his aids had gained a great victory;
the Latter-day Saints had either been exterminated, or driven from the
borders of Missouri, according to his order. Only those remained who were
incarcerated, and the day of their deliverance was near at hand.
Fulfilment of Prophecy
A revelation was given July 8, 1838, calling John
Taylor, John E. Page, Wilford Woodruff and Willard Richards to the
apostleship. John Taylor and John E. Page were ordained under the hands of
Brigham Young and Heber C. Kimball at a meeting held in Far West, December
19, 1838. In this revelation (Doc. and Cov., Sec. 118) the apostles were
commanded to take their leave of the Saints from the temple lot in Far
West on the 26th day of April, 1839. April had arrived and the Saints were
scattered, likewise the members of the council of the apostles. On the 5th
day of April, Samuel Bogart, the mobber, with John Whitmer and a few other
apostates, came to the room occupied by the committee on removal and read
this revelation to Theodore Turley. With much laughter and assurance that
it could not be fulfilled, they called on him to renounce Joseph Smith,
which now he must do as a rational man. The apostates said: “The twelve
are now scattered all over creation; let them come here if they dare; if
they do, they will be murdered. As that revelation cannot be fulfilled,
you will now give up your faith.” Turley jumped up and said: “In the name
of God that revelation will be fulfilled.” They laughed him to scorn. John
Whitmer hung his head in shame. In the course of the conversation Turley
asked John Whitmer if his testimony regarding the Book of Mormon was true,
and Whitmer answered: “I now say, I handled those plates; there were fine
engravings on both sides. I handled them;” and he then described how they
were hung, and then he said, “They were shown to me by a supernatural
power.”
The 26th day of April arrived, and so also did the
apostles at the temple lot in Far West. Early that morning, these brethren
and a few of the Saints assembled at the temple lot, and proceeded to
transact the business of their mission as they were commanded, according
to the following minutes:
“At a conference held at Far West by the twelve, high
priests, elders, and priests, on the 26th day of April, 1839, the
following resolution was adopted:“Resolved: That the following persons be no more
fellowshiped in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, but
excommunicated from the same, viz.: Isaac Russell, Mary Russell, John
Goodson and wife, Jacob Scott, Sen., and wife, Isaac Scott, Jacob Scott,
Jun., Ann Scott, Sister Walton, Robert Walton, Sister Cavanaugh, Ann
Wanless, William Dawson, Jun., William Dawson, Sen., and wife, George
Nelson, Joseph Nelson, and wife, and mother, William Warnock and wife,
Jonathan Maynard, Nelson Maynard, George Miller, John Griggs and wife,
Luman Gibbs, Simeon Gardner, and Freeborn Gardner.3“The council then proceeded to the building spot of
the Lord’s House; when the following business was transacted: Part of a
hymn was sung, on the mission of the twelve.“Elder Alpheus Cutler, the master workman of the
house, then recommenced laying the foundation of the Lord’s House,
agreeably to the revelation, by rolling up a large stone near the
southeast corner.“The following of the twelve were present: Brigham
Young, Heber C. Kimball, Orson Pratt, John E. Page, and John Taylor, who
proceeded to ordain Wilford Woodruff and George A. Smith, who had been
previously nominated by the First Presidency, accepted by the twelve,
and acknowledged by the Church, to the office of apostles and members of
the quorum of the twelve, to fill the places of those who had fallen.
Darwin Chase and Norman Shearer, who had just been liberated from
Richmond prison, where they had been confined for the cause of Jesus
Christ, were then ordained to the office of the seventies.”
After vocal prayer by each of the members of the council
of the twelve, and singing, the apostles took their leave of the Saints
there assembled, and departed for Illinois, and later for their mission to
Great Britain. And thus closed the history of the Latter-day Saints in
Missouri until some future day.
Notes
The prayer and the answer the Lord gave the Prophet are found in
sections 121, 122, 123, of the Doctrine and Covenants.
2. The Constitution of Missouri read as follows:
Article 4. That all men
have a natural and indefeasible right to worship Almighty God according to
the dictates of their own consciences; and that no man can be compelled to
erect, support, or attend any place of worship, or to maintain any
minister of the Gospel, or teacher of religion; that no human authority
can control or interfere with the rights of conscience; that no person can
ever be hurt, molested, or restrained in his religious professions, or
sentiments, if he do not disturb others in their religious worship.
Article 5. That no person,
on account of his religious opinions, can be rendered ineligible to any
office of trust or profit under this state; that no preference can ever be
given by law, to any sect or mode of worship.
At a conference held in Quincy, Illinois, March 17, 1839, George M.
Hinkle, Sampson Avard, John Corrill, Reed Peck, Frederick G. Williams,
Thomas B. Marsh, Burr Riggs and several others were excommunicated from
the Church.
Part Four
The Nauvoo Period
Chapter 27
Seeking a New Home
In January, 1839, the threats of the mob, and their
violence, became so severe that the Saints at Far West were forced to flee
from Missouri. In November, 1838, those members of the Church residing at
Adam-ondi-Ahman had been driven from their homes, and General Clark, in
his abusive harangue at Far West, told the people they must not think of
remaining another season. Should they attempt to put in crops he would
extend no mercy, and extermination at his hands would be their doom.
The exodus was carried on as rapidly as circumstances
would permit. Even in the inclement weather of the winter months the
vanguard made their way eastward as far as Quincy, Illinois. Here they
were met with a kindly welcome by the citizens of that place. Just where
the Saints would locate was an indefinite problem, and the Prophet, still
held in prison, could give them very little help. He advised them to
locate in some friendly territory between Far West and Kirtland, where
they might dwell in peace. It is likely that many of the refugees from
Missouri, who started on their eastward journey expected to work their way
back to the former settlements of the Saints in Ohio; but the hospitable
treatment they received and the suggestions from the people of western
Illinois, caused them to stop at Quincy. In fact, they could do little
else in their stricken condition, and a kind word and a hand outstretched
with relief, were most welcome. In Quincy an organization known as the
Democratic Association extended every kindness to the exiles, and
proffered to help them in their distress. Several meetings of this society
were held, in which other citizens of Quincy took a part, in February and
March of 1839. Sympathy was expressed for the “Mormons” and steps were
taken to allay the prejudice of the misguided residents of Quincy, who
felt an opposition to the Saints. At one of these meetings the “Mormons”
were invited to attend, and Sidney Rigdon and others related the
persecutions in Missouri, which account fell on sympathetic ears. Through
this organization material assistance was given the Saints, and employment
for many was provided. The organization voiced its disapproval of the evil
treatment accorded the exiles while in Missouri, in the following
resolutions:
“Resolved, that we regard the rights of conscience as
natural and inalienable, and the most sacred guaranteed by the
Constitution of our free government.“Resolved, that we regard the acts of all mobs as
flagrant violations of law; and those who compose them, individually
responsible, both to the laws of God and man, for every depredation
committed upon the property, rights, or life of any citizen.“Resolved, that the inhabitants upon the western
frontier of the state of Missouri, in their late persecutions of the
class of people denominated ‘Mormons,’ have violated the sacred rights
of conscience, and every law of justice and humanity.“Resolved, that the governor of Missouri, in refusing
protection to this class of people, when pressed upon by a heartless
mob, and turning upon them a band of unprincipled militia, with orders
encouraging their extermination, has brought a lasting disgrace upon the
state over which he presides.”
The Saints also were kindly received by Governor Thomas
Carlin and United States Senator Richard M. Young, and many other
prominent citizens of western Illinois.
In a communication to the Quincy
Argus, Elder John Taylor expressed the gratitude of the “Mormon”
people, and said they felt under peculiar obligations to the citizens of
Quincy; but he warned them against imposition on the part of any who may
pretend to belong to the community of Latter-day Saints, but who were not
—either those who never belonged to the Church, or those who, for
cause, had been expelled.
While the sympathies of these good people were, without
question, given in sincerity, nevertheless there was more or less
selfishness connected with their action. It is quite evident, from events
to follow, that they expected to obtain some political and business
advantages, out of the kindness extended to these destitute and stricken
refugees, who sought a haven of peace and rest within the borders of the
state. The expulsion from Missouri occurred shortly before one of the most
intense presidential elections, and a residence within the State of
Illinois for six months gave the citizens a right to vote. The politicians
on both sides lost no opportunity to seek the advantage which the “Mormon”
vote would bring; and the “Mormons,” too heavily engaged with thoughts of
recent persecutions, and hopes of building communities where they could
dwell in perfect peace, failed to comprehend the situation in which they
were being placed. By siding with one faction, it was bound to alienate
the other, and thus cause bitterness of feeling which might not be
overcome. In course of time such proved to be the case.
Committee to Locate Lands
While the Saints were gathering at Quincy, committees
were appointed to seek out suitable places for permanent settlement. A
meeting was held in February, 1839, to consider the proposition of
purchasing about twenty thousand acres, at two dollars an acre, between
the Des Moines and Missouri Rivers, on what were called half-breed lands.
Other sites were also considered from time to time, but no definite action
was taken until the arrival of Joseph Smith at Quincy, from his long
confinement in Liberty prison. Elder Israel Barlow, on his flight from
Missouri, made his way to the northeast and arrived in a destitute
condition near the mouth of the Des Moines River. There he was kindly
received and related the sad experiences of the Latter-day Saints. He made
the acquaintance of Dr. Isaac Galland, who owned considerable property
both in Iowa and Illinois, a short distance farther north. Mr. Galland
resided at a place called Commerce, in Hancock County, Illinois, about
fifty miles up the Mississippi from Quincy and lying on the bank of the
river.
Commerce
Mr. Galland in a communication to David W. Rodgers,
suggested that the Saints locate in Iowa, which was a territory; for he
thought they would be more likely to receive protection from mobs under
the jurisdiction of the United States, than they would in a state of the
Union, “where murder, rapine and robbery are admirable (!) traits in the
character of a demagogue; and where the greatest villains often reach the
highest offices.” He also wrote to Governor Robert Lucas of Iowa, who had
known the “Mormon” people in Ohio, and who spoke very highly of them as
good citizens. However, when the Prophet arrived at Quincy in April, he
purchased from Hugh White a farm of one hundred and thirty-five acres, for
the sum of five thousand dollars; also another farm from Dr. Isaac Galland
lying west of the White purchase, for nine thousand dollars. This
property, which was located in the vicinity of Commerce was secured on
long time notes. To these farms the destitute Saints commenced to gather,
also to the little town of Montrose on the Iowa side of the river.
Joseph Smith Moves to Commerce
Friday, May 10, 1839, President Joseph Smith took up his
residence in a small log house on the bank of the Mississippi, on the
White purchase, one mile south of Commerce. The first house built by any
of the Saints in that part was raised by Theodore Turley, in June, 1839.
When the purchase was made of the White and Galland property, Commerce
consisted of one stone house, three frame and two block houses, three of
which were log cabins. Between Commerce and David Hibbard’s place on the
south front of the river there were four houses, three of which were log
cabins, and into one of these the Prophet moved. The place was virtually a
wilderness. The land was covered with trees and bushes, and much of it, in
the lower parts near the river, was so wet that travel by team was
impossible, and on foot, most difficult. Notwithstanding the unhealthful
condition, the Prophet felt that by draining the land, and through the
blessing of the Lord, the place could be made a pleasant habitation for
the Saints, and he decided to build a city there. There was inspiration in
this decision, for this was an excellent site for the building of a city,
when the unfavorable conditions of the lowlands were removed. The
Mississippi makes a half circle around the place, giving three fronts on
the river. The ground gradually rises from the river front for a distance
of about one mile to the common level of the prairie lands which extend
beyond. A more beautiful site could not be imagined.
The City of Nauvoo
The name “Commerce” was soon changed to “The City of
Nauvoo.” This word is of Hebrew origin, and “signifies a beautiful
situation, or place,” says the Prophet, “carrying with it, also, the idea
of rest; and is truly descriptive of the most delightful location. It is
situated on the east bank of the Mississippi River, at the head of the Des
Moines Rapids, in Hancock County, bounded on the east by an extensive
prairie of surpassing beauty, and on the north, west and south, by the
Mississippi.” Nauvoo is about one hundred and ninety miles up the river
from St. Louis, and nearly the same distance from Chicago, towards the
west.
Other Sites Chosen
Other lands were also purchased, for the gathering of
the Saints, all on easy terms. Additional property adjoining that obtained
from White and Galland was obtained from David Hibbard, Daniel H. Wells,
Hiram Kimball, Horace R. Hotchkiss and others, which later became a
portion of the city of Nauvoo. Across the river on the Iowa side,
extensive holdings also were obtained. The village of Nashville, in Lee
County, with twenty thousand acres adjoining, were purchased; also other
lands opposite Nauvoo. Here the Prophet instructed the Saints that a city
should be built, to be called Zarahemla. A number of members of the Church
had located here when the Saints were driven from Missouri, and it
appeared to be a suitable location for a permanent settlement of the
people.
Stakes of Zion Organized
At the general conference held at Commerce, October 5
–7, 1839, two stakes of Zion were organized, one at Commerce, with
William Marks as president, and one in Iowa, with John Smith as president.
Later a number of other stakes were organized in Quincy, Lima, Columbus
and Geneva, Illinois, but they did not continue very long.1
The idea seemed to be that the Latter-day Saints should spread out over
considerable territory, and form organizations in various parts of the
country, but this plan was abandoned, and the Saints scattered abroad were
commanded by revelation in January, 1841, to gather to Hancock County,
Illinois, and to Lee County, Iowa, and to build up the settlements in
these parts occupied by the members of the Church. This was, the
presidency wrote, “agreeable to the order of heaven.” Consequently, the
Saints began to immigrate to Nauvoo, and the city grew rapidly by such
additions. About one year after the location of the site, Nauvoo had a
population of over three thousand souls, and six years later, at the time
of the great western exodus, about twenty thousand. The stake at Zarahemla
was later discontinued, but John Smith remained there to preside over the
Saints in Iowa.
Miraculous Healing of the Sick
Due to the unhealthful condition of the place when the
people first arrived at Commerce, many were taken sick with malaria fever,
and were nigh unto death. Some of the refugees were sheltered only by
tents and wagon covers, for there had been little time, and less means, by
which houses, even of logs, could be built. On the morning of July 22,
1839, the Prophet arose from his own bed of sickness and being filled with
the Spirit of the Lord, he went forth along the river bank healing all who
were afflicted. Among the number were Henry G. Sherwood and Benjamin
Brown, who appeared in a dying condition. He later crossed over the river
to Montrose and healed Brigham Young and a number of other brethren of the
twelve, and took them along with him to assist him in this ministry. What
took place in Iowa is thus related by Elder Wilford Woodruff:
“After healing all the sick upon the bank of the river
as far as the stone house, he called upon Elder Kimball and some others
to accompany him across the river to visit the sick at Montrose. Many of
the Saints were living at the old military barracks. Among the number
were several of the twelve. On his arrival, the first house he visited
was that occupied by Elder Brigham Young, the president of the quorum of
the twelve, who lay sick. Joseph healed him, then he arose and
accompanied the Prophet on his visit to others who were in the same
condition. They visited Elder W. Woodruff, also Elders Orson Pratt and
John Taylor, all of whom were living in Montrose. They also accompanied
him. The next place they visited was the home of Elijah Fordham, who was
supposed to be about breathing his last. When the company entered the
room the Prophet of God walked up to the dying man, and took hold of his
right hand and spoke to him; but Brother Fordham was unable to speak,
his eyes were set in his head like glass, and he seemed entirely
unconscious of all around him. Joseph held his hand and looked into his
eyes in silence for a length of time. A change in the countenance of
Brother Fordham was soon perceptible to all present. His sight returned,
and upon Joseph asking him if he knew him, he, in a low whisper,
answered, ‘Yes.’ Joseph asked him if he had faith to be healed. He
answered, ‘I fear it is too late; if you had come sooner I think I would
have been healed.’ The Prophet said, ‘Do you believe in Jesus Christ?’
He answered in a feeble voice, ‘I do.’ Joseph then stood erect, still
holding his hand in silence several moments; then he spoke in a very
loud voice, saying: ‘Brother Fordham, I command you in the name of Jesus
Christ to arise from this bed and be made whole.’ His voice was like the
voice of God, and not of man. It seemed as though the house shook to its
very foundations. Brother Fordham arose from his bed and was immediately
made whole. His feet were bound in poultices, which he kicked off, then
putting on his clothes, he ate a bowl of bread and milk, and followed
the Prophet into the street.”
In this manner the Prophet and the brethren passed from
house to house, healing the sick and recalling them from the mouth of the
tomb. It was on this occasion that a man, not a member of the Church,
seeing the mighty miracles which were performed, begged the Prophet to go
with him and heal two of his children who were very sick. The Prophet
could not go, but said he would send some one to heal them. Taking from
his pocket a silk handkerchief he handed it to Elder Wilford Woodruff and
requested him to go and heal the children. He told Elder Woodruff to wipe
the faces of the children with the handkerchief, and they should be
healed. This he did and they were healed. “As long as you keep that
handkerchief,” said Joseph to Brother Woodruff, as he sent him on his way,
“it shall remain a league between you and me.”
Incorporation of the City of Nauvoo
Nauvoo was incorporated in December, 1840. On the 16th
day of that month Governor Thomas Carlin signed the bill. Stephen A.
Douglas was secretary of state; and Abraham Lincoln, a member of the
legislature, had favored the bill. The boundaries of the city were
defined, with ample provision for expansion. The city council was to
consist of a mayor, four aldermen and nine councilors. The election was to
take place on the first Monday in February, 1841.
A Liberal Charter
The charter of the city was one of most liberal powers.
It was all—yes, even more—than the Saints, so long harassed by
mobs, had hoped to receive. It contained twenty-eight sections and was
bounded in its limitations only by the Constitution of the United States
and that of the state of Illinois. All the powers “conferred on the city
council of the city of Springfield” were granted to the city of Nauvoo.
The Mayor and Aldermen were given all the powers of justices of the peace,
both in civil and criminal cases, arising under the laws of the state. A
municipal court was provided composed of the mayor as chief justice, and
the aldermen as associates. This court had power to grant writs of habeas
corpus under all cases arising under the ordinances of the city council,
and trial by jury was guaranteed before twelve men.
The University of Nauvoo
The city council was authorized to establish and
organize the “University of the City of Nauvoo,” for “the teaching of the
arts, sciences and learned professions.” This institution was to be under
the management of a board of trustees, consisting of a chancellor,
registrar and twenty-three regents. These trustees were to be appointed by
the city council, and they were empowered with all the “privileges for the
advancement of the cause of education which appertain to the trustees of
any other college or university of this state.”
The Nauvoo Legion
Another provision granted the city council the power to
“organize the inhabitants of said city, subject to military duty, into a
body of independent military men, to be called the ‘Nauvoo Legion,’ the
court martial of which shall be composed of the commissioned officers of
said legion, and constitute the law-making department, with full power and
authority to make, ordain, establish, and execute all such laws and
ordinances as may be considered necessary for the benefit, government, and
regulation of said legion; provided said court martial shall pass no law
or act, repugnant to, or inconsistent with the Constitution of the United
States, or of this State; and provided also that the officers of the
legion shall be commissioned by the governor of the State.” This legion
was to perform the same amount of military duty as other bodies of the
regular militia, and to be subject to the call of the mayor in executing
the laws and ordinances of the city, and the governor for public defense.
Election of Municipal Officers
On the day appointed the election was held and John C.
Bennett, who had taken a most active part in the securing of the charter,
was elected mayor. The aldermen were William Marks, president of the
stake, Samuel H. Smith, Newel K. Whitney and Daniel H. Wells, the latter
at that time, not a member of the Church. The counselors were, Joseph
Smith, Hyrum Smith, Sidney Rigdon, Charles C. Rich, John T. Barnett,
Wilson Law, John P. Greene, Don Carlos Smith, and Vinson Knight. The
council appointed Henry G. Sherwood, marshall; James Sloan, recorder;
Robert B. Thompson, treasurer; James Robinson, assessor; and Austin
Cowles, supervisor of streets. When the Nauvoo Legion was organized,
Joseph Smith was elected lieutenant general, which position he held until
his death.
Character of the Mayor
John C. Bennett, the first mayor of Nauvoo, came to that
place near the close of the year 1840. He was born in Massachusetts in
1804; practiced medicine in Ohio and later in Illinois. He first heard of
the Latter-day Saints during their persecutions in Missouri, and in the
summer of 1840 corresponded with the Prophet, expressing great sympathy
for the Saints, and disapproval of the evil treatment they had received.
At the time of his writing he was quartermaster-general of the state of
Illinois, and had previously served as “brigadier general of the
Invincible Dragoons,” in the state militia. After coming to Nauvoo he
joined the Church and was the most active agent in securing the city
charter. He was a man of some ability, with many human weaknesses, and was
bombastic and self-important. We must give him credit for sincerity of
purpose in joining the Church although, without question, he was seeking
worldly fame; but through later immoral conduct he became most bitter in
his feelings, and an arch-traitor to the cause. His inaugural address,
delivered February 3, 1841, contains many worthy sentiments, but expressed
in a spirit of pedantry which spoiled much of the good effect.
Freedom for All
The first act passed by the city council of Nauvoo, was
a resolution presented by Joseph Smith thanking the governor, the council
of revision and the legislature of the state of Illinois, “for their
unparalleled liberality” for the powers which the charter conferred.
Later, but among the first ordinances introduced, was one assuring
protection to Catholics, Presbyterians, Methodists, Baptists, Latter-day
Saints, and all other religious organizations. As the ordinance read, they
were to have, “free toleration and equal privileges in this city, and
should any person be guilty of ridiculing and abusing, or otherwise
deprecating another, in consequence of his religion, or of disturbing or
interrupting any religious meeting within the limits of this city, he
shall, on conviction before the mayor or municipal court, be considered a
disturber of the public peace, and fined in any sum not to exceed five
hundred dollars, or imprisonment not exceeding six months.” In various
other ways were the liberties and personal rights of the citizens
safeguarded against the acts of rowdies, mobbers, and disturbers of the
peace.
Notes
See table of stakes in appendix.
Chapter 28
The Foreign Mission of the Twelve
On the 26th day of April, 1839, a majority of the
apostles took their leave of the Saints at Far West—then a hostile
land—to go forth and declare the everlasting Gospel “over the great
waters” as they had been commanded. The families of these brave men had
been recently and ruthlessly banished from their homes, and were on their
journey seeking shelter and a friendly habitation. It required the
greatest courage and the highest quality of faith for men to go forth
across the ocean to a foreign country to preach the Gospel without purse
or scrip, leaving their families in poverty, homeless, destitute, and ill.
Yet this was the test to which these brethren were put at this time. They
did not fail, but manfully and nobly took up their cross and started on
their missions. Other brethren, of the seventies, just as faithful,
accompanied them on their journey to the foreign field.
No sooner was the main body of the Saints located in
Iowa and Illinois, out of the reach of mobs, than most of the members of
the council of the twelve started on their way to the British Isles. On
the 2nd day of July, 1839, the presidency met with the apostles, and some
others who were to accompany them, and gave them instructions pertaining
to their labors. On this occasion many important items on doctrine, the
Priesthood, and the deportment of missionaries in the field, were
discussed. In the course of his instructions President Joseph Smith taught
them to beware of self-sufficiency, and to observe charity and wisdom and
to exercise the principle of mercy; for if we forgive our brother, or even
an enemy, before he repent or ask forgiveness, our heavenly Father will be
equally merciful unto us. He further instructed them that they were not
sent out to be taught, but to teach, and to be honest, open and frank, in
all intercourse with mankind. He closed his instructions with the
following words:
“I will give you one of the keys of the mysteries of
the kingdom. It is an eternal principle, that has existed with God from
all eternity: That man who rises up to condemn others, finding fault
with the Church, saying they are out of the way, while he himself is
righteous, then know assuredly, that that man is in the high road to
apostasy and if he does not repent will apostatize, as God lives. The
principle is as correct as the one that Jesus put forth in saying that
he who seeketh a sign is an adulterous person; and that principle is
eternal, undeviating, and firm as the pillars of heaven; for whenever
you see a man seeking after a sign, you may set it down that he is an
adulterous man.”
Items on Priesthood
About this time he also instructed the brethren on
various matters of Priesthood, from which the following excerpts are taken:
“The Priesthood was first given to Adam; he obtained
the First Presidency, and held the keys of it from generation to
generation. He obtained it in the creation, before the world was formed.
. . . He is Michael the Archangel, spoken of in the
scriptures. Then to Noah, who is Gabriel; he stands next in authority to
Adam in the Priesthood; he was called of God to this office, and was the
father of all living in his day, and to him was given the dominion.
These men held keys first on earth, and then in heaven.“The Priesthood is an everlasting principle, and
existed with God from eternity, and will to eternity, without beginning
of days or end of years. The keys have to be brought from heaven
whenever the Gospel is sent. When they are revealed from heaven, it is
by Adam’s authority.“Daniel in his seventh chapter speaks of the Ancient
of Days; he means the oldest man, our father, Adam, Michael; he will
call his children together and hold a council with them to prepare them
for the coming of the Son of Man. He (Adam) is the father of the human
family, and presides over the spirits of all men and all that have had
the keys must stand before him in this grand council. This may take
place before some of us leave this stage of action. The Son of Man
stands before him, and there is given him glory and dominion. Adam
delivers up his stewardship to Christ, that which was delivered to him
as holding the keys of the universe, but retains his standing as head of
the human family. . . .“The keys were first given to him and by him to
others. He will have to give an account of his stewardship, and they to
him.“The Priesthood is everlasting. The Savior, Moses, and
Elias, gave the keys to Peter, James and John, on the mount, when they
were transfigured before him. . . .“Christ is the Great High Priest, Adam next.”1
Epistle of the Twelve
After receiving their charge from the First Presidency,
before their departure for their fields of labor, the members of the
council of the twelve, wrote an epistle to the elders of the Church, the
churches scattered abroad, and all the Saints, giving them instruction:
and encouragement in their afflictions. To the Saints they said:
“We wish to stimulate all the brethren to
faithfulness; you have been, tried, you are now being tried; and those
trials, if you are not watchful, will corrode the minds, and produce
unpleasant feelings; but recollect that now is the time of trial; soon
the victory will be ours. Now may be a day of lamentation—then
will be a day of rejoicing. Now may be a day of sorrow—but by and
by we shall see the Lord; our sorrow will be turned into joy, and our
joy no man taketh from us.”
To the elders they said:
“God has called you to an important office. He has
laid upon you an onerous duty. He has called you to an holy calling,
even to be the priests of the Most High God, messengers to the nations
of the earth; and upon your diligence, your perseverance and
faithfulness, the soundness of the doctrines which you preach, the moral
precepts that you advance and practice, and upon the sound principles
that you inculcate, while you hold that Priesthood, hang the destinies
of the human family. You are the men that God has called to spread forth
his kingdom. He has committed the care of souls to your charge, and when
you received this Priesthood, you became the legates of heaven; and the
Great God demands it of you, that you should be faithful; and inasmuch
as you are not, you will not be chosen; but it will be said unto you,
‘Stand by and let a more honorable man than thou art take thy place and
receive thy crown.’”
The Missionaries Depart
At a meeting held in Commerce, Sunday, July 7, 1839,
Elders Brigham Young, John Taylor, John E. Page, Wilford Woodruff and
Orson Hyde, made their farewell remarks before their departure on their
foreign mission. The following day Elders Taylor and Woodruff took up
their journey toward their field of labor. Sunday, July 28, Elder Parley
P. Pratt, who had arrived in Commerce on the 10th from his long
confinement in Missouri prisons, made his farewell talk; so also did his
brother Orson, who had assisted Parley in his escape. August 29, Elders
Parley P. Pratt, Orson Pratt and Hiram Clark left Commerce on their
missionary journey, and they were followed September 18, by President
Brigham Young and Elder Heber C. Kimball. Elders George A. Smith, Reuben
Hedlock and Theodore Turley, left three days later. William Smith, of the
council of the twelve, failed to go. Willard Richards, not yet ordained an
apostle, was in England where he had remained since the opening of the
mission. Elders Orson Hyde and John E. Page were shortly afterwards set
apart for a mission to Palestine to dedicate the land for the return of
the Jews, and there was one vacancy in the council caused by the death of
David W. Patten, which was not filled until April, 1841, when Lyman Wight
was chosen.
Circumstances under which these brethren departed were
extremely distressing, as may be well imagined. Elder Heber C. Kimball
thus reports the departure of President Brigham Young and himself on their
missionary journey:
“September 14, President Brigham Young left his home
at Montrose to start on the mission to England. He was so sick that he
was unable to go to the Mississippi, a distance of thirty rods, without
assistance. After he had crossed the river he rode behind Israel Barlow
on his horse to my house, where he continued sick until the 18th. He
left his wife sick with a babe only three weeks old, and all his other
children were sick and unable to wait upon each other. Not one soul of
them was able to go to the well for a pail of water, and they were
without a second suit to their backs, for the mob in Missouri had taken
nearly all he had. On the 17th Sister Mary Ann Young got a boy to carry
her up in his wagon to my house, that she might nurse and comfort
Brother Brigham to the hour of starting.“September 18, Charles Hubbard sent his boy with a
wagon and a span of horses to my house; our trunks were put into the
wagon by some brethren; I went to my bed and shook hands with my wife
who was then shaking with a chill, having two children lying sick by her
side; I embraced her and my children, and bade them farewell. My only
well child was little Heber P., and it was with difficulty he could
carry a couple of quarts of water at a time, to assist in quenching
their thirst.“It was with difficulty we got into the wagon, and
started down the hill about ten rods; it appeared to me as though my
very inmost parts would melt within me at leaving my family in such a
condition, as it were almost in the arms of death. I felt as though I
could not endure it. I asked the teamster to stop, and said to Brother
Brigham, ‘This is pretty tough, isn’t it; let’s rise up and give them a
cheer.’ We arose, and swinging our hats three times over our heads,
shouted: ‘Hurrah, Hurrah for Israel.’ Vilate, hearing the noise, arose
from her bed and came to the door. She had a smile on her face. Vilate
and Mary Ann Young cried out to us: ‘Goodby, God bless you.’ We returned
the compliment, and then told the driver to go ahead. After this I felt
a spirit of joy and gratitude, having had the satisfaction of seeing my
wife standing upon her feet, instead of leaving her in bed, knowing well
that I should not see them again for two or three years” (“Life of Heber C. Kimball,” p. 275).
The conditions of some of the other brethren were little
better. Elders George A. Smith and companions upset their wagons in the
soft ground before they got out of sight of the village of Commerce, and
Elders Smith and Turley were so weak they could not get up, and Brother
Hedlock had to lift them into the wagon again. Soon after, as they were on
their way, some gentlemen passing them asked who had been robbing the
burying ground; so miserable did they appear.2 After passing
through many hardships, traveling without purse or scrip, the Lord coming
to their assistance many times in a miraculous way, these brethren finally
reached their destination. Elders John Taylor, Wilford Woodruff and
Theodore Turley arrived in Liverpool, January 11, 1840, and were followed
by President Brigham Young, Heber C. Kimball, Parley P. Pratt, Orson
Pratt, George A. Smith and Reuben Hedlock, who arrived April 6, after a
stormy passage of twenty-eight days. At the time of sailing, President
Young and Elder Kimball were still in poor health, and Elder George A.
Smith was suffering extremely with ague. It was impossible for the
brethren journeying on this mission to go together in a body, and
inadvisable. Due to sickness they were detained many days, yet they
pursued their course as rapidly as circumstances would permit. As
President Young and party left the New York harbor, the shore resounded by
the voices of the assembled Saints who had come to bid them farewell on
their journey. They unitedly sang: “The Gallant Ship is under Way,”
composed by Elder William W. Phelps.
Ordination of Willard Richards
The first council meeting of the apostles on foreign
soil was held in Preston, England, April 14, 1840, at the house of Elder
Willard Richards, who on this occasion was ordained to the apostleship by
President Brigham Young, and under the hands of all the brethren of the
council who were present. Other business was transacted and the brethren
assigned to fields of labor. On this occasion Brigham Young was also
unanimously sustained by the brethren of the twelve as the president of
that council. There were present: President Brigham Young, Heber C.
Kimball, Parley P. Pratt, Orson Pratt, John Taylor, Wilford Woodruff,
George A. Smith and Willard Richards.
The Millennial Star
A general conference of all the Saints in the British
Isles was held in Preston the following day, April 15, 1840, at which
there were present, or represented, the following: elders, 36; priests,
45; teachers, 36: deacons, 11; members, 1686, all contained in 34 branches
which had been raised up since the opening of that mission by Elder
Kimball and companions in 1837. At this conference it was decided to
publish a hymn book, and a monthly periodical under the direction and
superintendency of the twelve, for the benefit and information of the
members of the Church. The next day, in a council meeting of the apostles,
Parley P. Pratt was chosen to edit the monthly periodical which was to be
called “The Latter-day Saints’ Millennial Star,”
which soon made its appearance and has been issued continuously ever
since. The committee selected to prepare for printing a book of hymns was
Brigham Young, Parley P. Pratt and John Taylor.
British Copyright of the Book of Mormon
It was also decided, agreeable to the counsel of the
First Presidency previously obtained, that copyright of the Book of Mormon
and of the Doctrine and Covenants be secured in England; and that editions
of these books be printed. The first number of the
Millennial Star was issued in Manchester, in pamphlet form of
twenty-four pages, Wednesday, May 27, 1840. Later the place of publication
was transferred to Liverpool, which became the headquarters for most of
the publications of the Church, until comparatively recent years.
The First Patriarch in England
Under the labors of the twelve and their missionary
companions, branches of the Church had sprung up in various parts of
England, and the population of the Church was now growing rapidly. At
another council meeting of the twelve, held April 16, 1840, it was decided
that a patriarch be ordained, and the honor fell to the lot of Elder Peter
Melling, a most worthy man, who was ordained in Preston the following day.
Early in 1841, John Albiston was also ordained to this sacred calling.
Individual Labors of the Twelve
Elders John Taylor, Wilford Woodruff and-Theodore
Turley, the first of the missionaries to arrive in England, met in a
special council Friday, January 17, 1840, with Joseph Fielding and Willard
Richards of the presidency of the British Mission, and decided on their
fields of labor. It was agreed that Elders Taylor and Fielding should go
to Liverpool; Elder Hiram Clark, to Manchester, with Elder William
Clayton; and Brother Richards to labor where the Spirit should direct. In
Liverpool Elders Taylor and Fielding raised up a branch of about thirty
members before the arrival from America of the other brethren of the
twelve. This number rapidly increased and at the beginning of the year
1841, numbered more than two hundred souls. In March, 1842, the
headquarters of the mission were transferred to Liverpool.
In Herefordshire
In the Potteries of Staffordshire, Elders Woodruff and
Turley found a fruitful field. Elder Woodruff labored in Burslem, Hanley,
Stoke, Lane End and the Potteries from the 22nd of January, 1840, to the
2nd of March, preaching every night in the week, and two or three times on
the Sabbath day, and the people flocked to hear his words and many were
baptized. While preaching on the Sabbath, March 1, which was the
anniversary of his birth, the Lord manifested to him that he was to leave
that part of the country and go to the south. Acting on the impression
from the Spirit, he left on the 3rd of March and continued his journey to
the farming communities of Herefordshire and stopped at the home of Mr.
John Benbow, at Castle Frome, Ledbury. Mr. Benbow was a wealthy farmer,
cultivating some three hundred acres of land. Elder Woodruff presented
himself to this gentleman as a missionary from America and an elder of the
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, who had been sent to preach
the Gospel to him and his household and all the inhabitants of the land.
Mr. Benbow rejoiced in the statements of Elder Woodruff, and informed him
that there were in that place six hundred persons and more, who had broken
off from the Methodists and had taken the name of “United Brethren.” They
had forty-five preachers and a number of meeting houses that were duly
licensed according to the law of the land. They were searching for light
and truth. Losing no time, on the morning of the 5th, Brother Woodruff
stated he would like to begin his labors by preaching to the people. There
was a large hall in the mansion of Mr. Benbow, which was available for
that purpose, and the people were invited to come and hear the new
message, from the new world across the sea. The people of the neighborhood
deserted their ministers and came to hear this strange preacher, who, in
the course of a short time, baptized over six hundred persons in that
place. At the meeting held on March 8, a constable, sent through complaint
of the parish rector, came to arrest him for “preaching to the people.”
Elder Woodruff said he had a license to preach as well as the rector, and
if the constable would take a chair and sit beside him until the close of
the meeting he would be at his service. He then launched forth on a
discourse treating the first principles of the Gospel, and at the close of
the meeting opened the door for baptism, and several came forward to be
baptized; among the number were four preachers and the constable, who
said, “Mr. Woodruff, I would like to be baptized.” The constable went to
the rector and told him that if he wanted Mr. Woodruff arrested, he must
go himself and serve the writ, for he had heard him preach the only true
Gospel sermon he had ever heard. The rector then sent two clerks of the
Church of England as spies, and they were both baptized. The ministers and
rectors of the Church of England then sent a petition to the Archbishop of
Canterbury, to request Parliament to pass a law prohibiting the “Mormons”
from preaching in the British nation, stating that they had baptized
fifteen hundred persons, many of whom were members of the Church of
England. But the Archbishop, knowing well that the laws of England
permitted religious freedom, replied that the petitioners, if they had the
worth of souls at heart as much as they valued ground where hares, foxes
and hounds ran, they would not lose so many of their flock.
The other brethren also met with remarkable success. The
field was ripe, ready for the harvest, and thousands of the house of
Israel were soon gathered into the fold. At a conference of the Church in
the British Isles held in October, 1840, there was reported a Church
membership of about 4,000 souls, and in the meantime a number had
emigrated to the United States.
The First Emigration to the United States
In June, 1840, a company of forty Saints sailed in the
ship Britannia from Liverpool for New York,
being the first Saints to leave England for Zion.
The Mission to Palestine
At the general conference of the Church held in Nauvoo,
Hancock County, April 6–8, 1840, Elder Orson Hyde, who had not
departed for England with the other apostles, was appointed to take a
mission to Palestine to dedicate there the land for the gathering of the
Jews. Elder John E. Page, who had also tarried at home, was called to
accompany him. While addressing the congregation on the 6th, Elder Hyde
remarked that it had been prophesied, some years before, that he had a
great work to perform among the Jews; and that he had recently been moved
by the Spirit of the Lord to visit that people, and gather all the
information he could find respecting their movements, hopes and
aspirations, and communicate them to the Church. He expressed the desire
to visit the Jews in New York, London and Amsterdam, on his way to the
field of his appointment. It was moved and carried that he proceed at once
on his mission and that Elder John E. Page be given proper credentials and
accompany him. On the 15th of April, Elder Hyde left Nauvoo for Jerusalem.
Working his way across the country to New York, he sailed, after some
delays, for Liverpool, on his way to Palestine, Saturday, February 13,
1841. He traveled alone, as Elder John E. Page had failed to make the
journey.
Other Missionary Appointments
Other missionary appointments to foreign fields were
made in these early days. In July, 1840, William Barrett, a boy seventeen
years of age, was ordained an elder by Elders George A. Smith and Alfred
Cordon, in Hanley, Staffordshire, England, and set apart to take a mission
to Australia, to be the first missionary to that country. In August,
following, Elder William Donaldson, of the British army, having been
assigned to the field in India, was also blessed and set apart to labor
for the Church in that land. The following year, at the conference of the
Church, Elder Harrison Sagers was called to go to Jamaica; Elder Joseph
Ball, to South America; Elder Simeon Carter to Germany; and Elder Arza
Adams to Canada, where the Gospel had previously been preached.
The Return of the Apostles
On the 20th day of April, 1841, President Brigham Young
and Elders Heber C. Kimball, Orson Pratt, John Taylor, Wilford Woodruff,
George A. Smith and Willard Richards, with a company of Saints left
Liverpool on the ship Rochester, for New York.
Parley P. Pratt continued in England to edit the
Millennial Star and preside over the mission. After a period of one
month upon the water they arrived safely in New York, and continuing their
journey arrived in Nauvoo, July 1, 1841. Some eighteen or twenty months
before, these brethren had left Nauvoo, poverty-stricken, afflicted and
sorrowful of heart. Now they returned rejoicing and with gladness of
heart, bearing the fruit of their labors. They started on their way
without money, and returned with none. Yet, during their labors abroad,
they had published an edition of five thousand copies of the Book of
Mormon; and an edition of three thousand copies of the Hymn Book; over
fifty thousand tracts and pamphlets; had established a permanent magazine,
the Millennial Star; organized an emigration
agency for the gathering of the Saints to Zion, and had been instrumental
in the hands of the Lord in bringing thousands of the children of the
House of Israel to a knowledge of the everlasting Gospel. Truly it was a
marvelous work, worthy of all commendation.
The Prophet’s Comments
Commenting on the labors of these members of the council
of the apostles, the Prophet said:
“All the quorum of the Twelve Apostles who were
expected here this season, with the exception of Elders Willard Richards
and Wilford Woodruff, have arrived. We have listened to the accounts
which they give of their success, and the prosperity of the work of the
Lord in Great Britain with pleasure. They certainly have been the
instruments in the hands of God of accomplishing much, and must have the
satisfaction of knowing that they have done their duty. Perhaps no men
ever undertook such an important mission under such peculiarly
distressing and unpropitious circumstances. Most of them when they left
this place, nearly two years ago, were worn down with sickness and
disease, or were taken sick on the road. Several of their families were
also afflicted and needed their aid and support. But, knowing that they
had been called by the God of Heaven to preach the Gospel to other
nations, they conferred not with flesh and blood, but obedient to the
heavenly mandate, without purse or scrip, they commenced a journey of
five thousand miles entirely dependent on the providence of that God who
had called them to such a holy calling. While journeying to the seaboard
they were brought into many trying circumstances; after a short recovery
from severe sickness, they would be taken with a relapse, and have to
stop among strangers, without money and without friends. Their lives
were several times despaired of, and they have taken each other by the
hand, expecting it would be the last time they should behold one another
in the flesh. However, notwithstanding their afflictions and trials, the
Lord always interposed in their behalf, and did not suffer them to sink
in the arms of death. Some way or other was made for their escape—
friends rose up when they most needed them and relieved their
necessities; and thus they were enabled to pursue their journey and
rejoice in the Holy One of Israel. They truly ‘went forth weeping,
bearing precious seed,’ but have returned with rejoicing, bearing their
sheaves with them” (Documentary History of the
Church, vol. 4: 390).
Notes
Documentary History of the Church, vol. 3:385
–8.
2. Another incident worthy to relate is the
following statement by Elder Wilford Woodruff:
“Inasmuch as the devil had
been thwarted in a measure by the twelve going to Far West and returning
without harm, it seemed as though the destroyer was determined to make
some other attempt upon us to hinder us from performing our missions; for
as soon as any one of the apostles began to prepare for starting he was
smitten with chills and fever, or sickness of some kind. . .
.
“On the 25th of July, I was
attacked with chills and fever, for the first time in my life; this I had
every other day, and whenever attacked I was laid prostrate. My wife,
Phoebe, was also taken down with the chills and fever, as were quite a
number of the twelve. . . .
“Although feeble, I walked
to the banks of the Mississippi River; there President Young took me in a
canoe and paddled me across the river. When we landed, I lay down on a
side of sole leather, by the post office, to rest. Brother Joseph, the
Prophet of God, came along and looked at me. ‘Well, Brother Woodruff,’
said he, ‘you have started upon your mission.’ ‘Yes,’ said I, ‘but I feel
and look more like a subject for the dissecting room than a missionary.’
Joseph replied: ‘What did you say that for? Get up, and go along; all will
be right with you. . . .
“Soon a brother came along
with a wagon, and took us (Elders Taylor and Woodruff) in. As we were
driving through the place, we came to Parley P. Pratt, who was stripped to
his shirt and pants, with his head and feet bare. He was hewing a log,
preparatory to building a cabin. He said: ‘Brother Woodruff, I have no
money, but I have an empty purse, which I will give you.’ He brought it to
me, and I thanked him for it. We went a few rods further and met Brother
Heber C. Kimball, in the same condition, also hewing a log to build a
cabin. He said: ‘As Parley has given you a purse, I have got a dollar I
will give you to put in it.’ He gave me both a dollar and a blessing” (Wilford Woodruff—His Life and Labors, p. 108).
Chapter 29
Missouri Persecutions
Importuning for Redress
Having appealed in vain to the courts, the governor and
the legislature of Missouri, the Saints now determined to “importune for
redress and redemption at the feet of the President.” This course the Lord
commanded them to take. It was his will that the national government
should have the privilege of correcting the wrongs of the Latter-day
Saints, or share in the responsibility of their persecutions, should they
also turn a deaf ear to the appeal of thousands of citizens, who had been
banished from their homes.1 The Constitution guarantees that “the
citizens of each state shall be entitled to all the privileges and
immunities of citizens of the several states.” This great privilege had
been denied the Latter-day Saints by the officers of the State of Missouri.
President Sidney Rigdon arrived in Quincy, Illinois,
after his release from prison, in March, 1839, and was at that time very
zealous for the punishment of Missouri for the violation of the
constitutional rights of the Saints while in that state. He devised a
plan, on an elaborate scale, for the impeachment of Missouri before the
other states and the general government. He proposed to have the governors
of the several states present before their respective legislative bodies
the matter of Missouri’s abdication of republican government, and at the
same time have presented to the President of the United States and
Congress a petition for redress of the wrongs inflicted upon the Saints.
Governor Carlin of Illinois encouraged him in this desire and promised to
aid in the work. Governor Robert Lucas of Iowa also lent some assistance
to the plan. The latter issued letters of introduction to President Martin
Van Buren and Governor Shannon of Ohio, conveying the information that
President Rigdon expected to visit Washington as the representative of the
“Mormon” people to seek an investigation into the causes for the expulsion
of the Saints from Missouri. However, nothing came of this rather
impractical plan.
The Prophet’s Appeal to the People
About this same time (April, 1839) the Prophet made an
appeal to the citizens of the United States in the following language:
“I ask the citizens of this Republic whether such a
state of things is to be suffered to pass unnoticed, and the hearts of
widows, orphans, and patriots to be broken, and their wrongs left
without redress? No! I invoke the genius of our Constitution. I appeal
to the patriotism of Americans to stop this unlawful and unholy
procedure; and pray that God may defend this nation from the dreadful
effects of such outrages.“Is there no virtue in the body politic? Will not the
people rise up in their majesty, and with that promptitude and zeal
which are so characteristic of them, discountenance such proceedings, by
bringing the offenders to that punishment which they so richly deserve,
and save the nation from that disgrace and ultimate ruin, which
otherwise must inevitably fall upon it?”2
A Delegation Appointed to Visit Washington
At a conference of the Church held in Quincy in May,
1839, President Rigdon was formally appointed to carry the message of
grievances to Washington, and Elder Lyman Wight was appointed to collect
the necessary affidavits from those injured, to be presented at
Washington. President Rigdon made no great effort to get away on this
mission, and as time passed his ardor cooled and his desire to fill his
appointment lessened. At the October Conference, held at Commerce,
President Joseph Smith, who had arrived in Illinois during the summer, and
Judge Elias Higbee were also chosen to go to Washington as well as Sidney
Rigdon, to importune for redress. On the 29th of October, these three
delegates left Commerce in a carriage driven by Orrin Porter Rockwell,
with the intention of laying before Congress the grievances of the Saints
while in Missouri. At Quincy they were joined by Dr. Robert D. Foster who
accompanied them on their way to administer to Sidney Rigdon, who was ill.
At Springfield Judge James Adams took the Prophet to his home and treated
him with every consideration as though he had been his own son. After an
eventful journey the Prophet and Judge Higbee arrived in Washington,
November 28, 1839. They did considerable preaching on the way and were
forced to leave Sidney Rigdon in Ohio because of his sickness; Orrin P.
Rockwell and Dr. Robert D. Foster remained with him.
Interview with the President
The first step taken by the Prophet and Judge Higbee
after securing a boarding place was to call on the President of the United
States, Martin Van Buren. This was the following day, November 29. They
proceeded to the house of the President, which they state they found to be
a very large and splendid palace, decorated with all the fineries and
elegance of this world. After some preliminary arrangements they were
ushered into the presence of Mr. Van Buren. They handed him some of their
letters of introduction which stated the object of their visit and as soon
as the President read one of them, he looked up with a frown and said:
“What can I do? I can do nothing for you! If I do anything, I shall come
in contact with the whole state of Missouri.” The delegates were not to be
denied a hearing without some effort, so they pressed the matter of their
case with considerable vigor. The result was that President Van Buren
promised to reconsider what he had said, and expressed deep sympathy with
the Saints on account of their suffering.
The Petition before Congress
Following the interview with the President the brethren
spent some time hunting up senators and representatives with whom they
might converse and receive a hearing. They found the delegation from
Illinois friendly, and were able to make a number of friends among the
honorable gentlemen in Washington. A meeting was held with the
congressional delegation from Illinois, for the purpose of considering the
best means for getting their business before Congress. Mr. Robinson, of
the delegation, offered some opposition against the Saints presenting any
claims against Missouri to be liquidated by the United States, on the
ground that the Saints should make their appeal to the judiciary of
Missouri and the state officials, where the wrongs were committed. The
Prophet opposed such a stand with great vigor, explaining that every
effort had already been made to get the governor of Missouri and the
courts to consider their claims, but without result. Mr. Robinson then
said this was his first impression of the matter, but he would take it
under consideration. The following day another meeting was held and it was
decided that a petition should be drawn up to be presented to Congress,
and Senator Richard M. Young, of Illinois, promised to present it in the
United States Senate. They were advised that all facts presented should be
authenticated by affidavits, so word was sent to the Saints in Illinois to
prepare immediately such necessary information as would be required.3
The petition was duly presented to the judiciary committee. It
covered the outrages against the members of the Church from the expulsion
from Jackson County, in 1833, to the banishment from the state in 1838
–39. The dastardly course of Governor Boggs in aiding the enemies of
the Saints and his exterminating order received proper consideration. The
concluding paragraphs of this petition are as follows:
“For these wrongs, the ‘Mormons’ ought to have some
redress: yet how and where shall they seek and obtain it? Your
constitution guarantees to every citizen, even the humblest, the
enjoyment of life, liberty, and property. It promises to all, religious
freedom, the right to all to worship God beneath their own vine and fig
tree, according to the dictates of their conscience. It guarantees to
all the citizens of the several states the right to become citizens of
any one of the states, and to enjoy all the rights and immunities of the
citizens of the state of his adoption. Yet of all these rights have the
‘Mormons’ been deprived. They have, without a cause, without a trial,
been deprived of life, liberty and property. They have been persecuted
for their religious opinions. They have been driven from the state of
Missouri, at the point of the bayonet, and prevented from enjoying and
exercising the rights of citizens of the state of Missouri. It is the
theory of our laws, that for the protection of every legal right, there
is provided a legal remedy. What then, we would respectfully ask, is the
remedy of the ‘Mormons’? Shall they apply to the legislature of the
state of Missouri for redress? They have done so. They have petitioned,
and these petitions have been treated with silence and contempt. Shall
they apply to the federal courts? They were, at the time of the injury,
citizens of the state of Missouri. Shall they apply to the court of the
state of Missouri? Whom shall they sue? The order for their destruction,
then extermination, was granted by the executive of the state of
Missouri. Is not this a plea of justification for the loss of
individuals, done in pursuance of that order? If not, before whom shall
the ‘Mormons’ institute a trial? Shall they summon a jury of the
individuals who composed the mob? An appeal to them were in vain. They
dare not go to Missouri to institute a suit; their lives would be in
danger.“For ourselves we see no redress, unless it is awarded
by the Congress of the United States. And here we make our appeal as American Citizens, as
Christians, and as Men—believing
that the high sense of justice which exists in your honorable body, will
not allow such oppression to be practiced upon any portion of the
citizens of this vast republic with impunity; but that some measures
which your wisdom may dictate, may be taken, so that the great body of
people who have been thus abused, may have redress for the wrongs which
they have suffered. And to your decision they look with confidence;
hoping it may be such as shall tend to dry up the tears of the widow and
orphan, and again place in situations of peace, those who have been
driven from their homes, and have had to wade through scenes of sorrow
and distress.“And your Memorialists, as in duty bound, will ever
pray.”
The Prophet’s Interview with President Van Buren
While the Prophet was waiting for the action of
Congress, he visited several branches of the Church in Pennsylvania, New
Jersey and other parts, returning to Washington the fore part of February.
During this time he had another interview with President Martin Van Buren
and one with John C. Calhoun, and he records the following in his journal:
“During my stay I had an interview with Martin Van
Buren, the President, who treated me very insolently, and it was with
great reluctance he listened to our message, which, when he had heard,
he said: ‘Gentlemen, your cause is just, but I can do nothing for you;’
and ‘If I take up for you I shall lose the vote of Missouri.’ His whole
course went to show that he was an office-seeker, that
self-aggrandizement was his ruling passion, and that justice and
righteousness were no part of his composition. I found him such a man as
I could not conscientiously support at the head of our noble Republic. I
also had an interview with Mr. John C. Calhoun, whose conduct towards me
very ill became his station. I became satisfied there was little use for
me to tarry, to press the just claims of the Saints on the consideration
of the President and Congress, and stayed but a few days, taking passage
in company with Porter Rockwell and Dr. Foster on the railroad and
stages back to Dayton, Ohio” (Documentary History
of the Church, vol. 4:80).
The Action of Congress
Judge Elias Higbee remained in Washington during the
time the petition was before Congress. He met on several occasions with
the judiciary committee, which had the matter in hand. The members from
Missouri offered considerable opposition, as naturally might be supposed,
to the charges made against the officials of that state. They did all in
their power to prevent any consideration of the petition. Many false
statements and charges were made which Judge Higbee was able to refute. On
the 26th of February, he wrote the Prophet as follows: “I am just informed
by General Wall (the chairman of the committee), before whom, or to whom,
our business is referred, that the decision is against us, or in other
words unfavorable, that they believe redress can only be had in Missouri,
the courts and the legislature.” On the 4th of March, 1840, President
Joseph Smith arrived in Nauvoo. The same day the senate committee made its
report. After setting forth some of the items in the petition the
committee said:
“The petition is drawn up at great length, and sets
forth, with feeling and eloquence, the wrongs of which they complain;
justifies their own conduct, and aggravates that of those whom they call
their persecutors, and concludes by saying they see no redress, unless
it be obtained of the Congress of the United States, to whom they make
their solemn, last appeal, as American citizens, as Christians, and as
men; to which decision they say they will submit.“The committee have examined the case presented by the
petition, and heard the views urged by their agent, with care and
attention; and after full examination and consideration, unanimously
concur in the opinion—“That the case presented for their investigation is
not such a one as will justify or authorize any interposition by this
government.“The wrongs complained of are not alleged to be
committed by any of the officers of the United States, or under the
authority of its government in any manner whatever. The allegations in
the petition relate to the acts of its citizens, and inhabitants and
authorities of the State of Missouri, of which state the petitioners
were at the time citizens, or inhabitants.“The grievances complained of in the petition are
alleged to have been done within the territory of the State of Missouri.
The committee, under these circumstances, have not considered themselves
justified in inquiring into the truth or falsehood of the facts charged
in the petition. If they are true, the petitioners must seek relief in
the courts of judication of the State of Missouri, or of the United
States, which has the appropriate jurisdiction to administer full and
adequate redress for the wrongs complained of, and doubtless will do so
fairly and impartially; or the petitioners may, if they see proper,
apply to the justice and magnanimity of the State of Missouri—an
appeal which the committee feel justified in believing will never be
made in vain by the injured or oppressed.“It can never be presumed that a state either wants
the power or lacks the disposition to redress the wrongs of its own
citizens, committed within her own territory, whether they proceed from
the lawless acts of her officers or of any other persons. The committee
therefore report that they recommend the passage of the following
resolution:“Resolved, That the
committee on the judiciary be discharged from further consideration of
the memorial in this case; and that the memorialists have leave to
withdraw the papers which accompany their memorial” (Documentary History of the Church, vol. 4:90–2).
Compliance with the Word of the Lord
The Senate, of course, adopted this resolution, and this
brought to an end the appeal of the Latter-day Saints for redress of their
wrongs while in Missouri.4 The Saints had the satisfaction of
knowing they had complied with the command of the Lord, wherein he
instructed them to appeal for redress, first at the feet of the judge,
then the governor and then the President of the United States. The matter
was now to be left in the hand of the Great Judge who had promised, under
the circumstances as they had developed, to “come forth out of his hiding
place, and in his fury vex the nation” (Doc. and Cov. 101:89).
The Resolutions of the April Conference
At the general conference of the Church held April 6
–8, 1840, a set of resolutions were adopted approving of the labors
of the Church committee who visited Washington, and condemning the action
of the senate in the rejection of the consideration of the wrongs of the
Saints. Some of the items in which the resolutions disagree with the
action of Congress are as follows: The failure to consider the petition
was subversive to the rights of a free people, and justly called for the
disapprobation of all the supporters and lovers of good government. The
judiciary committee stated in their report, “that our memorial aggravates
the case of our oppressors,” and at the same time they said they had “not
examined into the truth or falsehood of the facts mentioned.” This was
deemed by the petitioners a great insult to their “good sense, better
judgment and intelligence,” when numerous affidavits were laid before the
committee to prove that the Saints could go into the State of Missouri
only in opposition to the exterminating order of the governor, and at the
risk of their lives. Moreover, that exterminating order was before the
committee for consideration, it was a direct infraction of the
Constitution of the United States. The failure of the committee to
investigate the actions of the governor and other officers of Missouri,
was “turning a deaf ear to the cries of widows, orphans, and innocent
blood, which had been shed,” and was “no less than seconding the
proceedings of that murderous clan, whose deeds are recorded in heaven,
and justly call down upon their heads the righteous judgments of an
offended God.” The thanks of the Saints were extended to Governors Lucas
of Iowa, and Carlin of Illinois, for their sympathy and aid, also to the
citizens of Illinois for their kind, liberal and generous conduct. The
delegates were instructed to continue their endeavors to obtain redress,
and the resolutions closed with the following appeal: “And if all hopes of
obtaining satisfaction for the injuries done us be entirely blasted, that
they (the delegates) then appeal our case to the Court of Heaven,
believing that the Great Jehovah, who rules over the destiny of nations,
and who notices the falling sparrows, will undoubtedly redress our wrongs,
and ere long avenge us of our adversaries.”5
Return of the Prodigals
At the general conference held in April, 1840, Frederick
G. Williams, who had been excommunicated by the action of the conference
of the Church at Quincy, March 17, 1839, along with Thomas B. Marsh,
George M. Hinkle and others, presented himself on the stand, and humbly
asked forgiveness for his conduct while in Missouri. He expressed his
determination to do the will of the Lord in the future, for he had a
knowledge of the divinity of the work. His case was presented to the
people by President Hyrum Smith, and he was received back into fellowship
by the unanimous vote of the conference. From this time on he remained
true to the Church and his brethren, until his death in Quincy October 10,
1842.
In the following June William W. Phelps wrote to the
Prophet from Dayton, Ohio, confessing his sins and begging for
reinstatement in the Church. “I am,” said he, “as the prodigal son, though
I never doubt or disbelieve the fulness of the Gospel. I have been greatly
abused and humbled, and I blessed the God of Israel when I lately read
your prophetic blessing on my head, as follows: ‘The Lord will chasten him
because he taketh honor to himself, and when his soul is greatly humbled
he will forsake the evil. Then shall the light of the Lord break forth
upon him as at noonday and in him shall be no darkness.’ I have seen the
folly of my way, and I tremble at the gulf I have passed. So it is, and
why I know not. I prayed, and God answered; but what could I do? Says I,
‘I will repent and live and ask my old brethren to forgive me, and though
they chasten me to death, yet I will die with them, for their God is my
God. . . . I have not walked along with my friends
according to my holy anointing. I ask forgiveness in the name of Jesus
Christ of all the Saints, for I will do right, God helping me.’”
The Prophet answered him saying his case had been
presented to the Saints and an expression of their feelings was
unanimously given that he should be received back into the Church.
Death of Bishop Partridge
Bishop Edward Partridge died Wednesday, May 27, 1840, in
Nauvoo, in the forty-sixth year of his age. He was the first bishop of the
Church, having been called to that position by revelation in 1831. He was
born in Berkshire County, Massachusetts, August 27, 1793. His daughter
Harriet Pamela, aged nineteen years, preceded her father to the grave by
eleven days. They were victims of the Missouri persecutions, and were
among those who suffered privations and exposure in the mobbings and
expulsion in the winter of 1838–9. Others who likewise laid down
their lives about this time were John Young, father of President Brigham
Young, Seymour Brunson and James Mulholland, the Prophet’s secretary. Each
of these brethren died shortly after the settlement of the Saints in
Illinois. John Young was a veteran of the Revolution. He had been driven
from his home in Missouri and died in his seventy-seventh year, a martyr
to his religion, for his death was caused by his sufferings in the cruel
persecution. Seymour Brunson died August 10, 1840. He was a man of strong
character, and had taken an active part in the Church almost from the
beginning, serving in various councils. He it was who entered charges
against Oliver Cowdery and David Whitmer at the time of their
excommunication. He died in his forty-first year and was at the time a
member of the high council in the Nauvoo Stake. James Mulholland died in
November, 1839, aged thirty-five years. He was a man of excellent
education and was a faithful elder in the Church.
Death of Patriarch Joseph Smith
Another victim of Missouri persecution was the Patriarch
Joseph Smith, who died in Nauvoo, September 14, 1840. He was the first
person who received the Prophet’s testimony after the appearance of the
angel, and was always true to the mission of his son. He moved to Kirtland
in 1831, where he was ordained patriarch and an assistant counselor to the
Prophet in the Presidency of the High Priesthood, December 18, 1833. He
served as a member of the first high council in 1834. During the
persecutions in Kirtland, in 1837, he was made a prisoner by the apostate
enemies of the Church, but gained his liberty and made his way to Far West
in 1838. From here he was again driven by enemies under the exterminating
order of the infamous Lilburn W. Boggs. In midwinter he made his way to
Quincy, and later in the spring of 1839, to Commerce, where he made his
home. He was six feet two inches tall, and well proportioned. His ordinary
weight was about two hundred pounds. He was a very strong, active man, but
the exposure he suffered during the expulsion from Missouri, brought on
consumption, from which he died. His funeral services were held September
15, 1840, Elder Robert B. Thompson delivering the discourse.
More Trouble from Missouri
The action of Congress and the President of the United
States, in refusing to consider the complaint, had its effect for evil on
the Missourians. Their hatred, great as it was against the Latter-day
Saints, was augmented by the presentation of the petition of the Saints to
the general government. They seemed to chafe under the exposures to the
world of their evil deeds. The action of Congress also made them bold in
their desire to continue their persecutions of the Saints. If the
President of the United States could refuse to give ear to the appeal of
the thousands who had been so wilfully and maliciously wronged; and if
Congress could advise that the proper place for redress was back in
Missouri, and that, too, at the hands of the very officials who had so
wickedly and unconstitutionally expelled, robbed, and murdered the Saints,
what was there for Missourians to fear? Was not this evidence that the
“Mormons,” everywhere hated, were the common prey of their mortal enemies?
It is true they had driven the Saints to the confines of another state,
but it was a matter of little moment to cross that border and drag them
back again for further abuse. Especially so, if they could enter into
collusion with the officers of the other states which they hoped to do,
and which they did.
Kidnapping of Alanson Brown and Others
On the 7th day of July, 1840, Alanson Brown, Benjamin
Boyce, Noah Rodgers and James Allred, were surrounded by an armed force of
mobbers, in Hancock County, Illinois, who asked them if they were
“Mormons.” When they said they were, the mobbers with many vile oaths
declared that they were sworn to kill “all the damned ‘Mormons’ that they
could find.” The brethren were forced across the river to a small town in
Lewis County, Missouri, called Tully, where they were kept under guard
until about eleven o’clock at night. Then Alanson Brown and Benjamin Boyce
were taken out to the woods with ropes around their necks. Boyce inquired
what they intended to do and was answered by the mobbers that they were
going to kill them and “make catfish bait” of them. The two brethren were
then separated. Boyce was stripped and tied to a tree and whipped with
gads until his body was mangled from his shoulders to his knees. In the
meantime Brown had been hung by the neck until life appeared to be gone,
then the ruffians cut him down, revived him, and returned to Tully with
them both. They then placed ropes on the necks of Allred and Rodgers and
took them out to the woods, where they stripped them of their clothing and
made many threats against their lives. Rodgers was badly beaten, as Boyce
had been, but for some reason the fiends refrained from whipping Allred.
These brethren were then returned to Tully and confined in the same room
with the other two brethren. Brown and Allred were liberated some days
later, but Boyce and Rodgers were confined in irons until the 21st day of
August, when, through the blessings of the Lord, they made their escape.
Memorial to Governor Carlin
A mass meeting of the citizens of Nauvoo was held July
13, 1840, at which a committee consisting of Isaac Galland, Robert B.
Thompson, Sidney Rigdon and Daniel H. Wells, drew up resolutions of
protest against the treatment accorded the four men who were kidnapped,
which were adopted. The citizens then memorialized Governor Carlin,
petitioning him to take steps to have released the four men who were then
held prisoners in Missouri, and have punished the perpetrators of the
crime. Daniel H. Wells and George Miller waited upon the governor and laid
the case before him. As they recited the story of the cruelties, the
governor’s wife, who was present, was moved to tears, and the governor
promised to take the matter in hand. However, his friendship for the
Saints had greatly cooled and no action was ever taken by Governor Carlin
to release the prisoners, or to bring to justice the perpetrators of the
crime.
Missouri’s Requisition for the Prophet
The next move on the part of Missouri was a requisition
made on Governor Carlin of Illinois, by Governor Lilburn W. Boggs, of
Missouri, in September, 1840, for Joseph Smith, Sidney Rigdon, Lyman
Wight, Parley P. Pratt, Caleb Baldwin and Alanson Brown, as fugitives from
justice. This came after a silence of nearly two years, and was the
outgrowth of the action taken by Congress. Governor Carlin complied with
this unnatural, illegal and absurd request. When the sheriff came to serve
his papers none of the brethren were found at home. Thus matters rested
until the summer of 1841. On the 4th day of June, 1841, the Prophet called
at the residence of Governor Carlin and had an interview with him and was
treated very kindly. A few hours after his departure the governor sent the
sheriff of Adams County, Thomas King, with a posse, and an officer from
Missouri, to arrest him and deliver him up to the authorities of Missouri.
They found the Prophet about twenty-eight miles south of Nauvoo. Some of
the posse, on discovering the spirit of the officer from Missouri,
returned to their homes in disgust. The party returned to Quincy where the
Prophet obtained a writ of habeas corpus, and Judge Stephen A. Douglas,
who providentially happened to be in Quincy, promised to give a hearing at
Monmouth, Warren County, the following week. The news of the Prophet’s
arrest soon spread and a rescuing party was formed to prevent the Prophet
being carried to Missouri, if that attempt should be made. He returned to
Nauvoo in the custody of the sheriff, whom he entertained at his own house
and waited on him, the sheriff, being sick. June 7, Sheriff King and the
Prophet, accompanied by a number of citizens from Nauvoo, left for
Monmouth, seventy-five miles distant, where the trial commenced on the
9th, and concluded the following day. Attorney O. H. Browning, of the
defense, made an eloquent plea closing his remarks in the following words:
“Yes, my eyes have beheld the blood-stained traces of
innocent women and children, in the dreary winter, who had traveled
hundreds of miles barefoot, through frost and snow, to seek a refuge
from their savage pursuers. ’Twas a scene of horror sufficient to enlist
sympathy from an adamantine heart. And shall this unfortunate man, whom
their fury has seen proper to select for sacrifice, be driven into such
a savage land and none dare to enlist in the cause of justice? If there
was no other voice under heaven ever to be heard in this cause, gladly
would I stand alone, and proudly spend my last breath in defense of an
oppressed American citizen.”
The Decision of Judge Douglas
Judge Douglas gave the following decision: That the
writ, being once returned to the executive by the sheriff of Hancock
County, was dead, and stood in the same relationship as any other writ
which might issue from the circuit court, and consequently the defendant
could not be held in custody on that writ. On the question whether or not
evidence was admissible, he would not pass, but would take under
advisement, but on the other point, the defendant must be dismissed. Once
again the Prophet Joseph had been freed from the clutches of the inhuman
officials of Missouri.
Notes
Doc. and Cov. 101:76–89.
Documentary History of the Church, vol. 3:332.
The Saints’ petition to Congress is found on pages 24–38 of the
Documentary History of the Church, vol. 4. The
affidavits are also found in the same volume, pages 52–73. These
should be carefully considered.
For the reason why the Saints did not accept the advice of the
committee and appeal to the Federal Courts, see article by Elder B.
H. Roberts, in the introduction to the Documentary
History of the Church, vol. 4, under the caption “The Appeal of the
Church to the National Government for Redress of Wrongs Suffered in
Missouri.”
The day of retribution came, at least in part, during the Civil War.
For this account see the introduction of Documentary
History of the Church, vol. 3, under the caption “Retribution,” by B.
H. Roberts.
Chapter 30
Important Events
The House of the Lord
In the various gathering places of the Saints from the
days of Kirtland the Lord commanded that temples to his name should be
built. In Jackson County and Far West, they were prevented from building
temples by their enemies, who drove them from their homes. At the
conference of the Church held in October, 1840, President Joseph Smith
spoke of the necessity of building a “house of the Lord” in Nauvoo.
Reynolds Cahoon, Elias Higbee and Alpheus Cutler were appointed a
committee to build such a house. On motion it was also resolved that a
commencement be made ten days from that date (Oct. 3, 1840) “and that
every tenth day he appropriated for the building of the temple.” Early in
January, 1841, the First Presidency issued a proclamation to the Saints
scattered abroad, in which they stated that “the temple of the Lord is in
progress of erection here, where the Saints will come to worship the God
of their fathers, according to the order of his house and the powers of
the Holy Priesthood, and will be so constructed as to enable all the
functions of the Priesthood to be duly exercised, and where instructions
from the Most High will be received.”
The Revelation of January 19, 1841
A very important revelation was received January 19,
1841, dealing with various subjects, but particularly with the building of
the temple and the ordinances to be performed therein. The Lord declared
that the prayers of the Prophet were acceptable to him, and he was called
upon to make a solemn proclamation of the Gospel to “all the kings of the
world, to the four corners thereof; to the honorable President-elect, and
the high-minded governors of the nation . . . and to all the
nations of the earth.” It was to be written in the spirit of meekness, yet
of warning, for he was “about to call on them to give heed to the light
and glory of Zion, for the set time has come to favor her.” The Lord would
visit the mighty and the rulers of the earth in the day of his visitation.
Therefore, said he, “Awake, O kings of the earth! Come ye, O, come ye,
with your gold and your silver, to the help of my people, to the house of
the daughters of Zion.”
The Saints to Come from Afar
The Saints were also commanded to come from afar.
Messengers were to be chosen and sent unto them saying: “Come ye, with all
your gold, and your silver, and your precious stones, and with all your
antiquities; and with all who have knowledge of antiquities, that will
come, may come, and bring the box tree, and the fir tree, and the pine
tree, together with all the precious trees of the earth; and with iron,
with copper, and with brass, and with zinc, and your precious things of
the earth, and build a house to my name for the Most High to dwell
therein.”
Fulness of the Priesthood
“For there is not a place,” said the Lord, “found on
earth where he may come and restore again that which was lost unto you, or
which he hath taken away, even the fulness of the Priesthood,” which
fulness can only be obtained in the house of the Lord.
The Kirtland Temple and its Mission
This declaration from the Lord would indicate that the
purpose for which the Kirtland Temple was erected was now fulfilled, and
its mission completed; and this was indeed the case. The Kirtland Temple
served temporarily only. It was built because a house was necessary where
the Lord could come and restore the various keys of former dispensations,
that the Dispensation of the Fulness of Times might be made complete. In
the Kirtland Temple the Lord gave a partial endowment, but not in the
fulness, that the apostles and others might be endowed with necessary
power to go forth “to prune the vineyard for the last time.” But the great
object was the restoration of the keys of former dispensations. When these
were bestowed, then greater light was revealed, and the full purpose of
temples and ordinance work therein was made known. It then became
necessary that a house of the Lord should be built that would be perfect
in all its parts, which was not the case in the structure of the Kirtland
Temple. That edifice, although one of the most important ever erected by
the Church, was not a complete structure as temples are understood through
increased revelation. In it there were no provisions for the salvation of
the dead; it had not a baptismal font—a fundamental part of the
perfect temple—and therefore, since it had filled the measure of its
creation, the Lord declared in the revelation of January, 1841, that there
was not a house on the earth where he could come to bestow the fulness of
the Priesthood and introduce the essential ordinances for the salvation of
both the living and the dead. Moroni, John the Baptist, Peter, James and
John, all came before there was a temple; but their coming was necessary
that the foundation might be laid and the Church established. The Lord has
made provision that in the sacred grove, the forest, and on the mountain
top, such keys may be bestowed, when there is no temple erected to his
name, and in the poverty of the people. Otherwise such keys are to be
received only in the temple reared to his holy name.
Baptism for the Dead
The doctrine of baptism for the dead was first made
known to the Saints in a discourse by the Prophet at the funeral of Elder
Seymour Brunson, August 10, 1840. This doctrine was not understood by him
until after the restoration of the keys and the Priesthood of Elijah in
the Kirtland Temple, although it had been referred to since the night of
the first appearance of Moroni. In this revelation of January, 1841, the
Lord revealed greater light regarding this wonderful principle. It was
here made known that this ordinance was to be performed in the temple of
the Lord. A baptismal font for this purpose was to be placed in the
basement of the temple, “as a simile of the grave,” and was commanded to
be in a place underneath where the living are wont to assemble, to show
forth the living and the dead; and that all things may have their
likeness, and that they may accord one with another; that which is earthly
conforming to that which is heavenly” (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 128:13).
In an epistle to the Twelve Apostles, who were at the
time in Europe, President Joseph Smith, October 19, 1840, made the
following statement:
“I presume the doctrine of ‘baptism for the dead’ has
ere this reached your ears, and may have raised some inquiries in your
minds respecting the same. I cannot in this letter give you all the
information you may desire on the subject; but aside from knowledge
independent of the Bible, I would say that it was certainly practiced by
the ancient churches; and St. Paul endeavors to prove the doctrine of
the resurrection from the same, and says, ‘Else what shall they do which
are baptized for the dead, if the dead rise not at all? Why are they
then baptized for the dead?’“I first mentioned the doctrine in public when
preaching the funeral sermon of Brother Seymour Brunson; and have since
then given general instructions in the Church on the subject. The Saints
have the privilege of being baptized for those of their relatives who
are dead, whom they believe would have embraced the Gospel, if they had
been privileged with hearing it, and who have received the Gospel in the
spirit, through the instrumentality of those who have been commissioned
to preach to them while in prison.”
The Rite Performed in the River
After this doctrine was revealed the Lord granted the
Saints the privilege of performing the ordinance of baptism for the dead
in the Mississippi River, until such time as a font could be prepared in
the basement of the temple. When a temporary font was prepared, and long
before the temple was completed, this privilege of baptizing for the dead
in any other place than the temple was discontinued by commandment of the
Lord. So important was this work in behalf of the salvation of the worthy
dead, that the Lord declared that the living could not be made perfect
without them, and, when the opportunity presented itself, should the
members of the Church fail to perform the ordinance for their dead, the
Lord said he would reject them, for the dead were to be saved by the same
principles which would save the living.
Things Hid from the Foundation of the World
Not only was the ordinance of baptism for the dead to be
performed in the temple, but the Lord promised to reveal many things
“which have been kept hid from before the foundation of the world, things
that pertain to the Dispensation of the Fulness of Times.” Here the keys
of the Holy Priesthood were to be received, for such were ordained to be
obtained in temples that the Saints may receive honor and glory, both the
living and, by proxy, the dead, even those blessings by which they should
be crowned with honor, immortality and eternal life.
The Nauvoo House
Another house was also to be built in Nauvoo. This was
the Nauvoo House, a place for the boarding of strangers. Joseph Smith,
Sidney Rigdon, Hyrum Smith, and many others were called upon to “pay
stock” for themselves and their seed after them “from generation to
generation,” in this house. It was to be a place where the “weary traveler
may find health and safety while he shall contemplate the word of the
Lord; and the corner stone [stake] I have appointed for Zion,” said the
Lord. Those who took stock were not to pay less than fifty dollars, and
not more than fifteen thousand dollars for any one man.
The Calling of Hyrum Smith
Another important commandment in this revelation was the
appointment of Hyrum Smith, to act as patriarch in the office which had
been held by his father, and also his ordination to be a “prophet, seer
and revelator” unto the Church, as well as Joseph Smith. The Lord had
pointed out several years before, when Joseph Smith, Sen., was called to
be the patriarch of the Church, that this office was his by right of
lineage, and descended from father to son, and was the right based on
faithfulness of the first born. At the time of Hyrum Smith’s call, he was
serving as second counselor in the First Presidency, a place he was called
to occupy after the transgression of Frederick G. Williams. The revelation
relating to this appointment reads as follows:
“And again, verily I say unto you, let my servant
William [Law] be appointed, ordained, and anointed, as a counselor unto
my servant Joseph [Smith] in the room of my servant Hyrum, that my
servant Hyrum may take the office of Priesthood and Patriarch, which was
appointed unto him by his father, by blessing and also by right.“That from henceforth he shall hold the keys of the
patriarchal blessing upon the heads of all my people;“That whoever he blesses shall be blessed, and whoever
he curses shall be cursed; that whatsoever he shall bind on earth shall
be bound in heaven; and whatsoever he shall loose on earth shall be
loosed in heaven.“And from this time forth I appoint unto him that he
may be a prophet, and a seer and a revelator unto my Church, as well as
my servant Joseph.“That he may act in concert also with my servant
Joseph, and that he shall receive counsel from my servant Joseph, who
shall show unto him the keys whereby he may ask and receive, and be
crowned with the same blessing, and glory, and honor, and Priesthood,
and gifts of the Priesthood, that once were put upon him that was my
servant Oliver Cowdery;“That my servant Hyrum may bear record of the things
which I shall show unto him, that his name may be had in honorable
remembrance from generation to generation, forever and ever.”
Oliver Cowdery’s Blessing Transferred to Hyrum Smith
Oliver Cowdery, as we have learned, stood with the
Prophet Joseph Smith in holding the keys of the kingdom. He was associated
with Joseph Smith in all his ordinations and in the bestowal of keys from
the heavens from the beginning. It was Oliver Cowdery, not Sidney Rigdon
or Frederick G. Williams, who knelt with the Prophet Joseph at the altar
in the Kirtland Temple, April 3, 1836, when the Savior, Moses, Elias,
Elijah, and perhaps other ancient prophets, came and conferred with them,
bestowing keys, Priesthood and authority of former dispensations that all
things might be complete and perfect in the Dispensation of the Fulness of
Times. All these blessings Oliver Cowdery would have held throughout
eternity, if he had remained faithful and true to his calling; but he fell
away, and therefore the Lord bestowed these gifts, blessings, and powers
of presidency, upon the head of Hyrum Smith, the faithful brother of the
Prophet Joseph, of whom the Lord also said in this revelation: “And again,
verily I say unto you, blessed is my servant Hyrum Smith, for I, the Lord,
love him because of the integrity of his heart, and because he loveth that
which is right before me.”
Sunday, January 24, 1841, Hyrum Smith received the
ordination to these holy callings under the hands of President Joseph
Smith. On the same occasion George Miller was ordained a bishop in the
place of Edward Partridge, deceased.
Laying Corner Stones of the Temple
April 6, 1841, which was the eleventh anniversary of the
organization of the Church, the corner stones of the Nauvoo Temple were
laid. Early in the morning fourteen companies of the Nauvoo Legion, and
two military companies from across the river in Iowa, assembled and were
conducted to the grounds assigned for the general review. During the
forenoon, various military maneuvers were conducted. It was an impressive
scene. At twelve o’clock the procession arrived at the temple grounds and
the ceremonies of laying the corner stones were commenced. President
Sidney Rigdon addressed the assembly at some length after which the
architects, under the direction of the First Presidency, lowered the
south-east corner stone to its place, and the Prophet said:
“This principal corner stone in representation of the
First Presidency, is now duly laid in honor of the Great God; and may it
there remain until the whole fabric is completed; and may the same be
accomplished speedily; that the Saints may have a place to worship God,
and the Son of Man have where to lay his head.”
Adjournment was taken for one hour and after the people
reassembled the three other corner stones were laid in the following
order: the south-west, the north-west and the north-east, after which the
services were closed.
Order of Temple Building
The Prophet later gave instructions pertaining to the
order of the laying of corner stones of temples as follows:
“If the strict order of the Priesthood were carried
out in the building of Temples, the first stone would be laid at the
south-east corner, by the First Presidency of the Church. The south-west
corner should be laid next; the third, or north-west corner, next; and
the fourth, or northeast corner, last. The First Presidency should lay
the southeast corner stone and dictate who are the proper persons to lay
the other corner stones.“If a temple is built at a distance, and the First
Presidency are not present, then the quorum of the Twelve Apostles are
the persons to dictate the order for that temple; and in the absence of
the Twelve Apostles, then the presidency of the stake will lay the
south-east corner stone; the Melchizedek Priesthood laying the corner
stones on the east side of the temple, and the Lesser Priesthood those
on the west side.”
Baptisms in the River Discontinued
At the conference of the Church held in Nauvoo, October
2nd to 5th, 1841, the Prophet made this announcement: “There shall be no
more baptisms for the dead, until the ordinance can be attended to in the
Lord’s House; and the Church shall not hold another General Conference,
until they can meet in said house. For thus saith the
Lord!” The reason for this announcement was that the temple had
progressed so far that the font in the basement had been prepared for this
ordinance, therefore, baptisms for the dead could no longer be performed
in the river.
Dedication of the Font in the Temple
One month later, November 8, 1841, the baptismal font in
the temple was dedicated. President Brigham Young was spokesman. The font
is described as being situated in the center of the basement room, under
the main hall of the temple. It was constructed of pine timber, and put
together of staves tongued and grooved, oval shaped, sixteen feet long
east and west, and twelve feet wide, seven feet high from the foundation,
the basin four feet deep, the moulding of the cap and base were formed of
beautiful carved work. It stood upon twelve oxen, four on each side, and
two at each end, their heads, shoulders, and fore legs projecting out from
under the font. The oxen and ornamental mouldings were carved by Elder
Elijah Fordham, which took him eight months to finish. This font was
replaced later by a permanent font which was more durable.
First Baptisms in the Temple
Sunday, November 21, 1841, the twelve met in council at
President Brigham Young’s house, and at four o’clock they repaired to the
baptismal font in the temple, where President Brigham Young, Elders Heber
C. Kimball and John Taylor baptized about forty persons for their dead.
Elders Willard Richards, Wilford Woodruff and George A. Smith, confirmed
them. These were the first baptisms for the dead in the font in the Lord’s
House. From this time forth, as long as the Saints remained in Nauvoo,
baptisms for the dead were performed in the temple.
Death of Don Carlos Smith
Sunday, August 7, 1841, Don Carlos Smith, the youngest
brother of the Prophet, died in Nauvoo. He was only twenty-six years of
age, and was one of the first to receive the testimony of the Prophet. He
received the Priesthood when but fourteen years of age, and in 1836 was
made president of the high priests’ quorum. He was on a mission in
Tennessee and Kentucky in 1838. During his absence in the midst of winter
his wife was driven from her home which was burned, and she was forced to
wade Grand River with her two little children. In Kirtland he labored in
the office of Oliver Cowdery and learned the art of printing. In the
flight of his father’s family from Missouri in the winter of 1839, he took
charge, and saw them removed to Quincy, Illinois. In June, 1839, he
commenced making preparations for printing the Times
and Seasons, a periodical published in Nauvoo. The press and type had
been rescued by Elias Smith, Hyrum Clark and others, from Dawson’s yard in
Far West, where it had been buried the night that place was besieged by
the mob-militia under General Lucas. The Times and
Seasons was issued by Don Carlos Smith and Ebenezer Robinson, the
first number appearing in November, 1839. At the time of his death the
editors were Don Carlos Smith and Robert B. Thompson. Don Carlos was six
feet four inches tall, was very straight, strong and active. The Prophet
said of him: “I never knew any fault in him; I never saw the first immoral
act, or the first irreligious or ignoble disposition in the child from the
time he was born until the time of his death. He was a lovely, a
good-natured, a kind-hearted, and a virtuous and faithful, upright child;
and where his soul goes, let mine go also.”
Death of Robert B. Thompson
Three weeks later, Robert Brashel Thompson, general
Church recorder, died at his residence in Nauvoo, in the thirtieth year of
his age. As already stated, he was associate editor of the Times and Seasons, and had been engaged in writing for the
Prophet and for the Church, and was a colonel in the Nauvoo Legion. In
1837, he married Mercy Rachel Fielding, sister of Mary Fielding Smith,
wife of the Patriarch Hyrum Smith. He and his associate Don Carlos Smith,
both fell victims to the unhealthful conditions which prevailed in Nauvoo
at the time of its settlement.
Dedication of Palestine
Early Sunday morning, October 24, 1841, Elder Orson
Hyde, of the council of the twelve, ascended the Mount of Olives and
dedicated by prayer the land of Palestine for the gathering of the Jews.
He was appointed to this mission at the April conference in 1840. Elder
John E. Page was also appointed to go with him, but lost the spirit of his
mission before he reached the eastern border of the United States, and
failed to cross the water, leaving Elder Hyde to make the journey alone.
After passing through many difficulties and privations Elder Hyde arrived
in Jerusalem in October, 1841. He prayed “for the gathering together of
Judah’s scattered remnants,” according to the predictions of the holy
prophets; for the building of Jerusalem again after it has been trodden
down by the Gentiles so long; and for rearing a temple to the name of the
Lord. “Grant, therefore,” he prayed, “O Lord, in the name of thy
well-beloved Son, Jesus Christ, to remove the barrenness and sterility of
this land, and let springs of living water break forth to water its
thirsty soil. Let the vine and olive produce in their strength, and the
fig tree bloom and flourish. Let the land become abundantly fruitful and
possessed by its rightful heirs; let it again flow with plenty to feed the
returning prodigals who come home with a spirit of grace and supplication.
Upon it let the clouds distill virtue and richness, and let the fields
smile with plenty. Let the flocks and the herds greatly increase and
multiply upon the mountains and the hills; and let thy great kindness
conquer and subdue the unbelief of thy people. Do thou take from them
their stony heart, and give them a heart of flesh; and may the sun of thy
favor dispel the cold mists of darkness which have beclouded their
atmosphere. Incline them to gather in upon this land according to thy
word. Let them come like clouds and like doves to their windows. Let the
large ships of the nations bring them from the distant isles; and let
kings become their nursing fathers, and queens with motherly fondness wipe
the tear of sorrow from their eye.”
In this manner Elder Hyde prayed upon the Mount of
Olives, dedicating the land for the return of the remnant of Judah from
the four corners of the earth. He also erected a pile of stones as a
witness according to the ancient custom, on the top of the Mount of
Olives, and another on the top of Mount Moriah, where the ancient temple
stood.
Orson Hyde of the House of Judah
Elder Orson Hyde was of the house of Judah. It was
therefore very proper that he, as one of the apostles of the Lord in this
last dispensation, should be sent to bless the land for the gathering of
the Jews. At one time, nearly ten years before, the following blessing was
pronounced upon him: “In due time thou shalt go to Jerusalem, the land of
thy fathers, and be a watchman unto the house of Israel; and by thy hand
shall the Most High do a work, which shall prepare the way and greatly
facilitate the gathering of that people.”1
The Book of Abraham
During the month of March the Prophet prepared for
publication his translation of the Book of Abraham, which he commenced to
translate while residing at Kirtland. Due to the persecutions and drivings
of the Saints this matter could not be attended to before this time, but
the manuscript had been carefully preserved, and was now published for the
benefit of the Church and all the world. This work together with the Book
of Moses, has since been received among the standard works of the Church.
The Wentworth Letter
At the request of Mr. John Wentworth, editor of the
Chicago Democrat, the Prophet prepared an article for publication giving a
brief history of the Church. This history was published in the Times and Seasons, March 1, 1842. Mr. Wentworth stated
that he wished to furnish the information to a Mr. Bastow who was writing
a history of New Hampshire. This article is one of the earliest documents
giving a consecutive account of the history of the Church. It is concise
and comprehensive, yet covers only a few pages. The most important feature
in this paper is the publication therein, for the first time, of the
Articles of Faith. These articles, thirteen in number, were given by
inspiration, and form a simple, comprehensive declaration of many
doctrines of the Church, which have since been accepted by the vote of the
Church as a standard epitome of belief. They are as follows:
“We believe in God the Eternal Father, and in His Son
Jesus Christ, and in the Holy Ghost.“We believe that men will be punished for their own
sins, and not for Adam’s transgression.“We believe that through the atonement of Christ all
mankind may be saved by obedience to the laws and ordinances of the
gospel.“We believe that these ordinances are 1st: Faith in
the Lord Jesus Christ; 2nd: Repentance; 3rd: Baptism by immersion for
the remission of sins; 4th: Laying on of hands for the gift of the Holy
Ghost.“We believe that a man must be called of God by
‘prophecy and by the laying on of hands’ by those who are in authority,
to preach the gospel and administer in the ordinances thereof.“We believe in the same organization that existed in
the primitive church, namely, Apostles, Prophets, Pastors, Teachers,
Evangelists, etc.“We believe in the gift of tongues, prophecy,
revelations, visions, healing, interpretations of tongues, etc.“We believe the Bible to be the word of God as far as
it is translated correctly; we also believe the Book of Mormon to be the
word of God.“We believe all that God has revealed, all that He
does now reveal, and we believe that He will yet reveal many great and
important things pertaining to the kingdom of God.“We believe in the literal gathering of Israel and in
the restoration of the Ten Tribes; that Zion will be built upon this
continent; that Christ will reign personally upon the earth, and that
the earth will be renewed and receive its paradisiacal glory.“We claim the privilege of worshiping Almighty God
according to the dictates of our own conscience, and allow all men the
same privilege, let them worship how, where or what they may.“We believe in being subject to kings, presidents,
rulers and magistrates, in obeying, honoring and sustaining the law.“We believe in being honest, true, chaste, benevolent,
virtuous, and in doing good to all men; indeed we may say that we follow
the admonition of Paul, ‘We believe all things, we hope all things,’ we
have endured many things, and hope to be able to endure all things. If
there is anything virtuous, lovely or of good report, or praiseworthy,
we seek after these things.”
Organization of the Relief Society
March 17, 1842, “The Female Relief Society of Nauvoo”
was organized by the Prophet Joseph Smith. Emma Smith was chosen president
with Elizabeth Ann Whitney and Sarah M. Cleveland, as counselors. The
purpose of the society is to furnish the sisters of the Church an
organization through which they could actively foster the welfare of the
members. The duty of the society was stated to be to aid the poor, nurse
the sick and afflicted, and in a general way, under the direction and
guidance of the bishop, to engage in true charitable work in behalf of all
whose necessities require assistance. This was the first organization of
women in the world, so far as history records. It is in keeping with the
genius of the Gospel, for the Lord provides duties and labors for all the
members of the Church, both men and women, wherein service may be rendered
for the temporal as well as the spiritual salvation of mankind.
Inauguration of Endowments
In the revelation of January 19, 1841, the Lord promised
to reveal to Joseph Smith all things pertaining to the temple and the
Priesthood thereof, which revelation and knowledge were necessary before
the temple was erected. Wednesday, May 4, 1842, the Prophet met with his
brother, Patriarch Hyrum Smith, President Brigham Young, Elders Heber C.
Kimball, Willard Richards, James Adams of Springfield, Bishops Newel K.
Whitney and George Miller, and instructed them in the principles and
orders of the Priesthood that belong to the temple of the Lord. He made
known to them the doctrines of washings and anointings and communications
spoken of in the revelation. In this council, which was held in the upper
room over his store, Joseph Smith also instructed these brethren in “all
those plans and principles by which any one is enabled to secure the
fulness of those blessings which have been prepared for the Church of the
First Born.” These same blessings, the Prophet stated, would in due time
be given in the temple to all the Saints who were worthy to receive them.
This was the introduction of the temple ceremonies in their fulness in
this dispensation, as they apply to the living and to the dead. From time
to time after this, these instructions (Documentary
History of the Church, vol. 5:1–2) were repeated and the other
members of the council of the twelve and their wives, and a few others,
received their endowments under the direction of the Prophet Joseph Smith,
as he was commanded to make these things known. The members of the Church
at large, however, were required to wait until such time as these
ordinances could be performed in the temple, the place designated by the
Lord for such instructions and ordinance work to be given.
Notes
1. The evidence of the divine power accompanying
the dedication of the land of Palestine is seen in the wonderful changes
which have come over that land in recent years, and also in the changed
attitude of the Jews, in relation to their return and also their belief in
Jesus Christ. Nephi prophesied as follows regarding the restoration of the
Jews: “And it shall come to pass that the Jews which are scattered also
shall begin to believe in Christ; and they shall begin to gather in upon
the face of the land; and as many as shall believe in Christ shall also
become a delightsome people” (2 Nephi 30:7). The Savior also referred to
this in his instruction to the Nephites: “And I will remember the covenant
which I have made with my people; and I have covenanted with them that I
would gather them together in mine own due time, that I would give unto
them again the land of their fathers for their inheritance, which is the
land of Jerusalem, which is the promised land unto them forever, saith the
Father. And it shall come to pass that the time cometh, when the fulness
of my gospel shall be preached unto them: and they shall believe in me,
that I am Jesus Christ, the Son of God, and shall pray unto the Father in
my name.” (3 Nephi 20:29–30).
At the time of the dedication of Palestine the feeling
expressed by the Jews towards Jesus Christ was most bitter. This condition
is stated by Dr. Isadore Singer, as follows: “When I was a boy, had my
father who was a very pious man, heard the name of Jesus uttered from the
pulpit of our synagogue, he and every other man in the congregation would
have left the building and the rabbi would have been dismissed at once.
“Now it is not strange in many synagogues to hear
sermons preached eulogistic of this Jesus, and nobody thinks of protesting
—in fact, we are all glad to claim Jesus as one of our people.”
Compare the letter of Rabbi Landau, Documentary
History of the Church, vol. 3:356.
In 1891, Baron Maurice de Hirch founded the Jewish
Colonization Association. The “Lovers of Zion” Association was commenced
about 1878, and was supported by Baron Edmund de Rothschild. The Zionist
Federation was organized in 1896, and was strongly promulgated by Theodore
Herzl of Vienna, Baron de Rothschild and many other renowned Jews. All of
these organizations were formed to aid in the colonization of the Jews in
Palestine. The first congress of the Zionist Federation was held in Basel,
Switzerland, in 1897, where the old nationalistic sentiment was revived,
and organizations were established for the gathering of the Jews.
At the Zionist Congress held in London in 1901,
Professor R. Gothell, president of the federation, said: “It is time the
nations understood our motives. Our purpose is gradually to colonize
Palestine. We political Zionists desire a charter from the Sultan
authorizing us to settle in our Holy Land, and we ask the powers to
approve and protect this charter.”
A few years ago the firm of Funk and Wagnalls published
an edition of Dr. George Croley’s work: “Tarry Thou Till I Come,” and in
the introduction Dr. Funk said: “It has been believed by many from the
earliest ages of the Christian era that among the signs of Christ’s coming
would be the recognition of him by the Jews as one sent of the Father; and
that they would then be restored to the Father’s favor.” Dr. Funk also
collected a number of expressions from leading Jews, their belief in
regard to the Savior, which were published in Dr. Croley’s work. Some of
them are as follows:
Rabbi Henry Berkowits: “This
Jew, Jesus, is the greatest, noblest rabbi of them all.”
Morris Jastrow: “From the
historic point of view, Jesus is to be regarded as a direct successor of
the Hebrew prophets. His teachings are synonymous with the highest
spiritual aspirations of the human race.”
Jacob H. Schiff: “We Jews honor
and revere Jesus of Nazareth as we do our own prophets who preceded him.”
The Savior said to his disciples in relation to the
destruction of Jerusalem: “And they shall fall by the edge of the sword,
and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be
trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be
fulfilled” (Luke 21:24). The indication that this time of restitution is
at hand is seen in the results coming out of the capture of Palestine by
General Allenby in December, 1917, during the Great War. Since that time
the Holy Land has been under the control of the British nation, and Dr.
Herbert Samuel, an orthodox Jew, has been sent there as governor of the
land. This is the first time since before the fall of Jerusalem (70
A. D.), which was predicted by the Savior, that a ruler from the house of
Judah has presided in that land. It is an event of great significance.
Chapter 31
Perfidy of John C. Bennett
Doctor John C. Bennett came to Nauvoo in August, 1841,
and joined the Church. Through his zealous activity in assisting to
procure the Nauvoo Charter, he was honored by the citizens in the first
election, by being chosen mayor of Nauvoo. He also rose to prominence in
the councils of the Church, and appeared to be a firm believer in the
Gospel, and a staunch friend to President Joseph Smith. Not many months
later, however, through immoral conduct, he lost the spirit of the Gospel,
and likewise his love for President Joseph Smith. His case is an
illustration of the truth, that the Spirit of the Lord will not dwell in
an unholy tabernacle. When men transgress the Holy Spirit withdraws, and
the light in them turns to darkness. The first intimation that all was not
well with Dr. Bennett was made manifest to the Prophet May 7, 1842, after
a drill and sham battle by the Nauvoo Legion. This event had been under
preparation since the previous January, and it was the intention of all to
make it a grand success. In the forenoon of that day there was a parade of
the legion, some twenty-six companies, comprising about two thousand
troops. Judge Stephen A. Douglas, who was holding court at Carthage,
adjourned, and with some leading attorneys, went to Nauvoo to witness the
military maneuvers of the legion. While there he was the guest of
President Joseph Smith. The day passed harmoniously without confusion. A
large company of spectators and distinguished strangers had assembled to
witness the sham battle.
Dr. Bennett who was major general of the legion
requested President Smith as lieutenant general to take command of the
first cohort during the sham battle. But this the Prophet declined to do.
Bennett next requested him to take his station in the rear of the cavalry
without his staff, while the engagement was going on; but Captain Albert
P. Rockwood of the Prophet’s body guard would not consent, and kept close
by his leader’s side, who chose his own position. The Spirit of the Lord
whispered to Joseph Smith that all was not well, and after the day’s
celebration was over he said, “If General Bennett’s true feelings toward
me are not made manifest to the world in a very short time, then it may be
possible that the gentle breathings of that Spirit which whispered to me
on parade, that there was mischief concealed in that sham battle, were
false; a short time will determine the point. Let John C. Bennett answer
at the day of judgment: Why did you request me to command one of the
cohorts, and also to take my position without my staff, during the sham
battle, on the 7th of May, 1842, where my life might have been the
forfeit, and no man have known who did the deed?”
Bennett’s Resignation
Ten days later, Dr. Bennett resigned his office as mayor
of Nauvoo having been accused of immorality. The same day he went before
Alderman Daniel H. Wells, who was not a member of the Church, and made
affidavit to the effect that he had never been taught anything in the
least contrary to the principles of the Gospel, and the strictest morality
in both word and deed, by Joseph Smith. On the 19th, the city council met
and elected Joseph Smith to fill Bennett’s unexpired term as mayor of
Nauvoo. Before the council on this occasion, Bennett was accused with
having said Joseph Smith taught him to practice immorality. He replied,
that “those who made such a statement were infernal liars,” for Joseph
Smith had always taught him to be virtuous. He then pled to be forgiven of
his wrong doing, and said he hoped yet to prove by repentance his
worthiness to fellowship in the Church. For the sake of his mother, he
prayed that his evil practices might not be exposed. In this apparently
repentant spirit he appeared before nearly one hundred brethren and cried
like a child, stating, “that he was worthy of the severest chastisement.”
The brethren thought him sincere and the Prophet in mercy pled in his
behalf. In a very short time, it was discovered that not only had Bennett
been guilty of immoral practices, but he had taught others to be like
himself, placing the responsibility for such teachings on the shoulders of
the Prophet. The result was that others had to be handled for their
fellowship. For this cause, and a defiant spirit, Chauncey L. Higbee, was
excommunicated. Others, on confession of their wrong doing, and
repentance, were forgiven.
J. C. Bennett Leaves Nauvoo
Notwithstanding the mercy extended to Bennett by the
brethren some time during the month of June, he left Nauvoo, breathing out
threatenings against the Prophet and the Church. He made the statement
“that he had withdrawn from the fellowship of the Saints because they were
not worthy of his society.” He then entered into correspondence with the
enemies of Joseph Smith in Missouri, endeavoring to stir them up to
continue their persecutions against him. This made it necessary that a
public statement be made in regard to the immoral practices of Dr.
Bennett. This document which was signed by the Prophet contained a
supporting affidavit, bearing the signatures of the aldermen and
councilors of the city of Nauvoo. Bennett later published a book, The History of the Saints, which represented to be an
exposé of “Mormonism.” The work was so filled with corrupt expressions,
such as would naturally come from so vile a source, that it only created a
spirit of disgust in those who read it, and it proved to be a failure.
Shooting of Ex-Governor Boggs
On the 6th day of May, 1842, ex-Governor Lilburn W.
Boggs was shot while sitting alone in a room of his residence in
Independence. He was badly wounded and for several days his life was in
the balance, but he soon recovered.
President Smith Accused as an Accessory
July 20, 1842, Boggs went before Samuel Weston, justice
of the peace in Independence, and made affidavit that Orrin Porter
Rockwell, a resident of Illinois, had done the shooting. He applied to
Governor Carlin in his affidavit, for the surrender of Rockwell “according
to law.” Subsequently he made another affidavit in which he said he had
“good reason to believe, from evidence and information now in his
possession, that Joseph Smith, commonly called ‘the “Mormon” Prophet,’ was
accessory before the fact of the intended murder, and that the said Joseph
Smith is a citizen or resident of the state of Illinois.” He applied to
Governor Thomas Reynolds of Missouri, for a demand on Governor Carlin of
Illinois, to deliver up Joseph Smith, to be dealt with according to law.
Governor Reynolds very willingly granted the request, and appointed Edward
R. Ford agent to receive the Prophet. In the requisition, Governor
Reynolds stated “Joseph Smith is a fugitive from justice, charged with
being accessory before the fact, to an assault with the intent to kill,
made by one O. P. Rockwell, on Lilburn W. Boggs, in this state
(Missouri) and is represented to the executive department of this state as
having fled to the state of Illinois.” He therefore demanded the surrender
of the Prophet on these grounds. Boggs had not accused Joseph Smith of
being a fugitive, or with fleeing from Missouri; this charge was added by
Reynolds. No doubt his reason was that he knew Missouri could have no
claim upon Joseph Smith without making it appear that he had committed the
alleged crime within Missouri and fled from her borders.
The foundation for this accusation was perhaps based on
the rumor circulated at the time, and printed in the Quincy Whig, that Joseph Smith had prophesied that Boggs would
die a violent death. As soon as the Prophet heard of this rumor he took
occasion to deny it publicly saying that he had made no such statement.
Nevertheless, it gave occasion for an accusation, and it appears evident
that Boggs and his fellow conspirators thought it an opportunity, and an
excuse, to get the Prophet within their clutches, where they might kill
him “according to law.”
Governor Carlin’s Action
Governor Carlin of Illinois, appeared to be a party to
this conspiracy. He had, at least, become embittered against President
Joseph Smith, and was very willing to accede to the demand from Missouri.
He was thoroughly acquainted with the law and knew perfectly well that the
Prophet was in Nauvoo on the 6th day of May, 1842, consequently was not
subject to the requisition of Governor Reynolds of Missouri. He knew that
President Smith was not a fugitive from justice; and, even if the false
and malicious charge had been true, he knew the Prophet was entitled to a
fair and legal trial in Illinois, not Missouri. Yet he would yield to this
unlawful and unrighteous demand against his knowledge of these facts.
The Rocky Mountain Prophecy
On Saturday, August 6, 1842, President Joseph Smith
passed over the river to Montrose, in company with General James Adams,
Colonel Brewer, Hyrum Smith and a number of others, and witnessed the
installation of the officers of the Rising Sun Lodge of Masons, by General
Adams, deputy grand master of Illinois. While General Adams was giving
instructions to the master-elect, Joseph Smith had a conversation with a
number of the brethren who were resting in the shade of the building. His
topic was the persecutions of the Saints in Missouri, and the constant
annoyance which had followed them since coming to Illinois and Iowa. In
the course of his conversation the Prophet uttered a prophecy which he
recorded in his journal as follows:
“I prophesied that the Saints would continue to suffer
much affliction and would be driven to the Rocky Mountains, many would
apostatize, others would be put to death by our persecutors, or lose
their lives in consequence of exposure or disease, and some of them
would live to go and assist in making settlements and build cities and
see the Saints become a mighty people in the midst of the Rocky
Mountains.”
Arrest of President Smith
The governor of Illinois honored the demand of the
Missourians, and on the 8th day of August, 1842, President Joseph Smith
and Orrin P. Rockwell were both taken into custody by the deputy sheriff
of Adams County, on a warrant issued by the governor. The prisoners
demanded the right of habeas corpus, and the court of Nauvoo issued a writ
demanding that the bodies of the two accused men be brought before that
court. The deputy sheriff and his aids refused to recognize the
jurisdiction of the court, and returned to Governor Carlin for further
instructions, leaving the Prophet and Rockwell in the hands of the marshal
of Nauvoo. The marshal had no papers by which they could be held, so
permitted them to go about their business.
The Prophet’s Comments on His Arrest
Commenting on his arrest, the Prophet said:
“I have yet to learn by what rule of right I was
arrested to be transported to Missouri for a trial of the kind stated.
‘An accessory to an assault with intent to kill,’ does not come under
the provision of the fugitive act, when the person charged has not been
out of Illinois. An accessory before the fact to manslaughter is
something of an anomaly. The isolated affidavit of ex-Governor Boggs is
no more than any other man’s, and the constitution says, that no person
shall be liable to be transported out of the state for an offense
committed within the same. The whole is another Missouri farce.”
Expecting the return of the deputy sheriff, President
Smith secured a writ of habeas corpus from the master in chancery for the
district of Illinois, fearing that the court of Nauvoo might be deemed
without jurisdiction or authority. Two days later when the officers
returned, President Smith and Rockwell were not at home. The deputy
sheriff made many threats and tried to intimidate the brethren at Nauvoo,
but failing in this, when questioned, he admitted that the course the
governor had taken was unjustifiable and illegal.
President Joseph Smith in Retirement
Because of the excitement which prevailed and the fear
that they would be unlawfully dragged to Missouri, Joseph and O. P.
Rockwell retired to seclusion. While in retirement the Prophet kept in
touch with affairs in Nauvoo and wrote to the Saints from time to time. It
was while thus confined that he wrote the important letters which now
appear as sections 127 and 128 in the Doctrine and Covenants, on baptism
for the dead.
Threats of Mob Vengeance
When the officers failed to find President Smith and
Orrin Porter Rockwell, they were enraged and threatened to return with a
sufficient force to search every house in Nauvoo. Ford, the officer from
Missouri, declared that he would come with a mob from Missouri and take
the Prophet by force. Hearing of these reports, President Smith wrote to
Wilson Law, major general of the Nauvoo Legion, advising him to take
necessary steps to protect the citizens of Nauvoo against any such attack.
In his communication he said he had come to the conclusion that he would
never suffer himself to fall into the hands of the Missourians alive, if
he could help it. To surrender to the officers of Illinois meant the same
thing, for Governor Carlin had joined hands with Missouri, taking unlawful
steps to send him to that state. “I am determined, therefore,” the Prophet
said, “to keep out of their hands, and thwart their designs, if possible.”
Emma Smith Appeals to Governor Carlin
August 17, 1842, Emma Smith wrote a pathetic appeal to
Governor Carlin pleading the cause of her husband and the Latter-day
Saints, and requesting that he rescind his order to turn President Smith
over to his enemies in Missouri. She set forth in a clear, logical manner
the fact that the decision to deliver him to the authorities in Missouri
was contrary to law. That if he had been guilty of any crime it must have
been committed in Illinois, and the pursuit of President Smith was a
continuation of the old mob spirit and persecution which had followed the
Saints during all the years of their sojourn in Missouri. Others also
appealed to the governor, reminding him of the many threats that were made
against the citizens of Nauvoo, by John C. Bennett, Edward R. Ford and
others. His reply to all of these was that he could not conceive of an
attack of violence upon the citizens, and there was “no excitement
anywhere but in Nauvoo, amongst the Mormons themselves.” There was no
apprehension of trouble in other places, so far as he was able to
ascertain. At the same time he confessed in conversation, that “persons
were offering their services every day, either in person or by letter, and
held themselves in readiness to go against the Mormons” whenever he should
call upon them. Judge Ralston, who was present when the governor read Emma
Smith’s letter, asked him how he thought Mr. Smith could go through the
midst of his enemies, without violence being used towards him; and, if
acquitted, how was he to get back? The governor was unable to make
satisfactory reply.
Answering Emma Smith’s letter, the governor said he had
been “prompted by a strict sense of duty,” and in discharge of that duty,
had “studiously pursued that course least likely to produce excitement and
alarm.” He hoped that Joseph Smith would submit to the laws and that
justice might be done. At the same time he said the Constitution and the
laws of the United States required him to take the course he did regarding
Joseph Smith as a fugitive from justice. Yet he was perfectly aware that
President Smith was not a fugitive in any sense of the term. He further
suggested that if “he is innocent of any crime, and the proceedings are
illegal, it would be the more easy for him to procure an acquittal,” and
he felt that Missouri would grant the “utmost latitude” in his defense. It
was clear that he had no friendly disposition towards the President of the
Church.
A Ruse to Capture President Smith
In the meantime President Joseph Smith returned to
Nauvoo and in a meeting of a special conference August 29, addressed the
Saints. Some of the Saints thought he had gone to Washington, others that
he had gone to Europe, however, he had been in Nauvoo most of the time.
Sunday, October 2, 1842, word came from Quincy, that Governor Carlin had
offered a reward of two hundred dollars for the capture of Joseph Smith
and the same amount for O. P. Rockwell. The Quincy Whig also stated that Governor Reynolds of Missouri, had
offered a reward of three hundred dollars for each of the brethren.
President Sidney Rigdon, who had been in conversation at Carthage with
Judge Stephen A. Douglas, concerning Governor Carlin’s proceedings,
informed William Clayton that he had learned that the governor had
purposely issued an illegal writ, expecting President Joseph Smith would
be drawn by it to Carthage to be acquitted before Judge Douglas on habeas
corpus proceedings. As soon as this was done a legal writ would be served
and he would be carried away to Missouri. Elder Elias Higbee confirmed
President Rigdon’s report, adding thereto that many Missourians were
coming to unite with the militia of Illinois, voluntarily, at their own
expense. If President Smith should fail to go to Carthage they would come
in force to Nauvoo and search the city. Receiving this knowledge, the
Prophet concluded again to leave home for a season, and thus defeat the
plans of Governor Carlin and his aids.
Justin Butterfield’s Legal Opinion
While all these trials and tribulations were going on,
the case of President Joseph Smith had been presented to United States
District Attorney Justin Butterfield, of Chicago, by the master in
chancery, Major Warren. Mr. Butterfield wrote to Sidney Rigdon, October
10, 1842, an elaborate opinion on the case. The salient points in his
opinion are as follows: If it could be proved that Joseph Smith had not fled from Missouri since the commission of the
crime of which he was accused, and that he was not in that state at that
time, then the governor of Illinois had no power to surrender him to
Missouri. According to the Constitution, a man to be a fugitive, “must be
a person who shall flee from justice and be found in another state.” The
defendant has the right to show that the process upon which he was
arrested was obtained by false pretense, that it is untrue that he fled
from Missouri to evade being brought to justice there, for the crime of
which he is charged. The affidavit of Boggs is not conclusive and may be
rebutted; the defendant has the right to show the affidavit false. The
affidavit of Boggs “on its face was not sufficient to authorize the arrest
of Smith.” The opinion concluded with the following advice:
“I would advise that Mr. Smith procure respectable and
sufficient affidavits to prove beyond all question, that he was in the
state (Illinois) and not in Missouri, at the time the crime with which
he is charged was committed, and upon these affidavits, apply to the
governor to countermand the warrant he has issued for his arrest.“If he should refuse to do so, I am clearly of the
opinion that, upon the above state of facts, the supreme court will
discharge him upon habeas corpus.”
Governor Carlin’s attitude being unfavorable, no further
action was taken until December, when the term of Carlin expired. On the
8th of that month Thomas Ford was inaugurated as the chief executive of
Illinois. Immediately affidavits were obtained to prove beyond controversy
that President Joseph Smith was in the state of Illinois on the 6th day of
May, 1842, the day of the shooting of ex-Governor Boggs, but Governor Ford
refused to interfere with the action of his predecessor. The supreme court
being in session, he passed the case with all the papers up to them for a
decision. The judges held that the writ was illegal, but were divided as
to whether or not Ford should interfere. The governor thereupon addressed
President Joseph Smith, December 17, 1842, stating that he had submitted
the case to the supreme court of Illinois. The governor then said:
“I can only advise that you submit to the laws and
have a judicial investigation of your rights. If it should become
necessary, for this purpose, to repair to Springfield, I do not believe
that there will be a disposition to use illegal violence towards you;
and I would feel it my duty in your case, as in the case of any other
person, to protect you with any necessary amount of force from mob
violence whilst asserting your rights before the courts, going to and
returning.”
The Prophet Receives Advice
Justin Butterfield, in a letter from Springfield of the
same date, advised the Prophet to accept the suggestion of Governor Ford.
He said the judges of the supreme court were unanimous in the opinion that
he would be entitled to a discharge under a habeas corpus writ. Therefore
he advised President Smith to go to Springfield without delay, for he had
the right to bring the case before the United States court, which was then
in session. “I will stand by you,” he said, “and see you safely delivered
from your arrest.”
Another letter was received from Judge James Adams, who
greatly loved the Prophet. He said:
“My Son: It is useless for me to detail facts that the
bearer can tell. But I will say that it appears to my judgment that you
had best make no delay in coming before the court at this place for a
discharge under a habeas corpus.”
Joseph Smith Surrenders for Trial
Acting on this advice, President Smith prepared to go to
Springfield. December 26, he was arrested by General Wilson Law on the
proclamation of Governor Carlin. The next day in the custody of Wilson Law
and a number of his closest friends, he commenced his journey. On the way
they obtained a writ of habeas corpus from the master in chancery at
Carthage. On the 30th, he arrived at the home of Judge James Adams, in
Springfield. The next day, to save delay, and possible legal
complications, Governor Ford was petitioned for another writ that the case
might be tried thereon and it was issued. At half-past eleven President
Smith went before Judge Pope, where Mr. Butterfield presented all the
papers in the case and asked for habeas corpus, because the accusation was
false, which was granted. The Prophet was then placed under bail in the
sum of four thousand dollars. Judge Adams and Wilson Law went bail for
him, and his case was set for Monday morning, January 2, 1843.
The Trial
A postponement of the trial was taken until the
following Wednesday. When the case came before the court, the attorney
general, Josiah Lamborn, moved to dismiss the proceedings, objecting to
the jurisdiction of the court. He was overruled and the trial proceeded.
On the 5th day of January, 1843, Judge Pope rendered a lengthy decision,
1
discharging the Prophet on the grounds that he was entitled to
his discharge for defect in the affidavit on which the demand for his
surrender to Missouri was made. “To authorize the arrest in this case,”
the opinion said, “the affidavit should have stated distinctly—1st,
that Smith had committed a crime; 2nd, that he committed it in Missouri.
It must appear that he fled from Missouri to authorize the governor of
Missouri to demand him, as none other than the governor of the state from
which he fled can make the demand. He could not have fled from justice
unless he committed a crime, which does not appear. It must appear that
the crime was committed in Missouri, to warrant the governor of Illinois
in ordering him to be sent to Missouri for trial.”
On these grounds an order was entered discharging the
prisoner from arrest. Once again Missouri, persecutor of saints and
prophets, was defeated; but her thirst for their blood was not satisfied.
Bennett’s Letter to Sidney Rigdon and Orson Pratt
January 10, 1843, John C. Bennett sent a communication
from Springfield to Sidney Rigdon, and addressed to Rigdon and Orson
Pratt, in which he states that he was leaving for Missouri to confer with
the messenger charged with the arrest of Joseph Smith, Hyrum Smith, Lyman
Wight, and others, who would be demanded in a few days on the old charge
of “murder, burglary, treason, etc.” This was on the new indictments found
by the grand jury and based on the original evidence. He said: “We shall
try Smith on the Boggs case, when we get him into Missouri. The war goes
bravely on; and although Smith thinks he is now safe, the enemy is near,
even at the door.” Moreover, he stated that they had the assurance that
the governor of Illinois would acknowledge the new demand. “There is but
one opinion on the case,” he wrote, “and that is, nothing can save Joe on
a new requisition and demand predicated on the old charges on the
institution of new writs. He must go to Missouri; but he shall not be
harmed if he is not guilty; but he is a murderer, and must suffer the
penalty of the law.” A postscript requested that Sidney Rigdon hand the
letter to Orson Pratt. After reading it, Sidney Rigdon did as he was
requested, but Orson Pratt immediately took the letter to President Joseph
Smith and informed him that he was not in league with such a character as
Bennett. Bennett wrote to these men knowing that at the time they were
both lukewarm towards the work, and that Orson Pratt, for disobedience,
had been handled for his fellowship. Following this episode, Orson Pratt
was received back in the fellowship of the Church. For some time previous
to this incident, Sidney Rigdon had failed to magnify his calling and had
gone contrary to counsel. When confronted with the letter from Bennett he
denied having had any correspondence with him.
Rejoicing in Nauvoo
When President Smith returned to Nauvoo, from his trial,
there was great rejoicing. Tuesday, January 17, 1843, was set apart by the
apostles as a “day of humiliation, fasting, praise, prayer and
thanksgiving” before the Lord. Many public meetings were held throughout
the city. One public gathering of this kind was held at the home of
President Joseph Smith. The following day a party of invited guests
assembled at his home to celebrate his deliverance from his enemies. The
day passed very pleasantly; many interesting anecdotes were related, and
what added interest to the occasion was the fact that it was the fifteenth
anniversary of the Prophet’s wedding day.
Notes
For the full decision, which should be read see
Documentary History of the Church, vol. 5:223–231. See also
pages 233–244 for papers on the trial.
Chapter 32
A Brief Period of Peace
At the beginning of the year 1843, peace reigned in
Nauvoo; for a time the Saints remained undisturbed, and the Prophet had a
breathing spell of freedom. Yet there were ripples on the surface of the
water. President Joseph Smith had been delivered from his enemies in
Missouri. The persecutors of the Church had been defeated; but were still
determined to pursue their evil course. The Missourians were in league
with the enemies of the Prophet in Illinois, with a relentless
determination to bring him to his death.
This brief period of peace gave the Prophet an
opportunity to instruct the Saints in various duties and doctrines and
more fully to establish the order and authority of the Priesthood. The
building of the temple progressed; increased light was thrown on the
subject of salvation for the dead, and the Saints were impressed with the
wonderful importance and responsibility connected with their obligations
in relation to their fathers. Important revelations were received. The
number of inhabitants in Nauvoo rapidly increased, and there was a time of
prosperity and general rejoicing. But such a condition was not destined to
continue very long. The clouds of malicious hatred were to be seen in the
distance, and soon the storm of bitter persecution was to break forth once
again in redoubled fury. Traitors within, and enemies without, were to
join hands for the destruction of the Prophet.
President Joseph Smith’s Intimation of Death
President Smith evidently understood that this spell of
peace and prosperity would not last. With constant pleading he urged the
Saints to increase their labors on the temple, and they responded with
hearty good will. In his prophecy, August 6, 1842, he declared to his
brethren that he was not destined to go with them to the Rocky Mountains;
yet they failed to comprehend his meaning. On several occasions he
intimated in his remarks that his enemies would not be satisfied with
anything short of his life, and then they would pursue others. He spoke to
the Saints at a meeting in the unfinished temple, January 22, 1843, taking
for his text, “The Setting up of the Kingdom of God.” In the course of his
discourse he said: “I shall not be sacrificed until my time comes; then I
shall be offered freely. All flesh is as grass, and a governor is no
better than other men; when he dies he is a bag of dust. I thank God for
preserving me from my enemies. I have no enemies but for the truth’s sake.
I have no desire but to do all men good. I feel to pray for all men. We
don’t ask any people to throw away any good they have got; we only ask
them to come and get more. They would then see eye to eye, and the
blessings of God would be poured out upon the people, which is the desire
of my whole soul. Amen.”
Doctrinal Development
Early in January, 1843, in discoursing on the kingdom of
God, the Prophet said: “Some say the kingdom of God was not set up on the
earth until the day of Pentecost, and John the Baptist did not preach the
baptism for repentance for the remission of sins. But I say, in the name
of the Lord, that the kingdom of God was set up on the earth from the days
of Adam to the present time. . . . Where there is no
kingdom of God, there is no salvation. What constitutes the kingdom of
God? Where there is a prophet, a priest, or a righteous man unto whom God
gives his oracles, there is the kingdom of God; and where the oracles of
God are not, there the kingdom of God is not.” In relation to the Gospel
and baptism preached by John, he said: “John came preaching the Gospel for
the remission of sins. He had his authority from God, and the oracles of
God were with him.” Speaking of the sign of the Holy Ghost, he stated:
“The Holy Ghost is a personage, and in the form of a personage. It does
not confine itself to the form of a dove, but in the sign of a dove. The
Holy Ghost cannot be transformed into the form of a dove; but the sign of
a dove was given to John to signify the truth of the deed [baptism of
Christ], as the dove is an emblem or token of truth and innocence.” In
February he received a revelation embodying the following principle: There
are two kinds of beings in heaven; angels, who are resurrected personages,
having bodies of flesh and bones; and spirits of just men made perfect who
are not yet resurrected, but inherit the same glory. In April, 1843, he
gave instructions at Ramus, as follows: “When the Savior shall appear, we
shall see him as he is. We shall see that he is a man like ourselves and
that same sociality which exists among us here will exist among us there,
only it will be coupled with eternal glory, which glory we do not now
enjoy.” The reckoning of God’s time, angel’s time and man’s time is
according to the planet on which they reside. All angels who minister on
this earth, have belonged to it. Angels reside in the presence of God on a
globe like a sea of glass and fire, where all things for their glory are
manifest. The place where God dwells is a great Urim and Thummim. This
earth, in its sanctified and immortal state, will be like unto crystal and
will be a Urim and Thummim to the inhabitants who dwell thereon, whereby
all things pertaining to an inferior kingdom, or all kingdoms of a lower
order, will be manifest to those who dwell on it. The white stone
mentioned in Revelation 2:17 will become a Urim and Thummim to each
individual who receives one, through which things of a higher order will
be made known. Again, he taught that all principles of intelligence we
attain unto in this life, will rise with us in the resurrection. The
Father has a body of flesh and bones as has the Son, Jesus Christ, also,
but the Holy Ghost is a personage of Spirit. During the time of the trial
at Springfield, in answer to questions, he said: “Christ and the
resurrected Saints will reign over the earth during the thousand years.
They will not probably dwell upon the earth, but will visit it when they
please, or when it is necessary to govern it. There will be wicked men on
the earth during the thousand years. The heathen nations who will not come
up to worship will be visited with the judgments of God.” In this manner,
in conversations, discourses and writings, the Prophet taught the people.
Attempt to Repeal the Nauvoo Charter
When Governor Thomas Ford delivered his inaugural
address in December, 1842, he recommended modification of the Nauvoo
charter, on the grounds that many objections had been raised because of
exceptional powers, which had been granted. Yet these powers had proved
beneficial to the Saints, and where righteous government was administered,
as it was in Nauvoo, such a charter proved to be a blessing. In the hands
of despots such privileges might have been abused. When the charter was
granted, the prophet said: “The city charter of Nauvoo is of my own plan
and device. I concocted it for the salvation of the Church, and on
principles so broad, that every honest man might dwell secure under its
protective influence without distinction of sect or party.” A bill was
presented in the legislature to repeal certain sections of the charter
shortly after that body convened. The enemies of the Saints endeavored to
repeal much more than had at first been contemplated, and take from the
charter many provisions like those found in the charters of the other
cities in Illinois. This attempt was made purposely to hurt the “Mormons,”
by restricting their rights. The bill passed the house in March with a
vote of 58 to 33. When it reached the senate it was tabled. The time for
the repeal had not arrived.
A General Missionary Call
At the conference of the Church in April, 1843, a
general missionary movement was contemplated. President Joseph Smith, in
the course of his remarks, advised that the elders when they went forth as
missionaries, should preach repentance and the things they were sent to
preach. “Declare the first principles,” he said, “and let mysteries alone,
lest you be overthrown. Never meddle with the visions of beasts and
subjects you do not understand.” Following the general conference a
special conference convened April 10, and continued through the 12th,
presided over by the apostles. At this conference elders were chosen and
their appointments given for various mission fields in Canada and the
several states, excepting blighted Missouri. On the 11th of May,
following, Addison Pratt, Noah Rogers, Benjamin B. Grouard and Knowlton F.
Hanks, were selected to go on missions to the Pacific isles; Dan Jones, to
Wales; James Sloan, to Ireland; John Cairnes and Samuel James to England,
with Reuben Hedlock, who was appointed to preside in Great Britain with
Hiram Clark and Thomas Ward, who were in England, as his assistants.
Eternity of the Marriage Covenant
While at Ramus, May 16 and 17, 1843, the Prophet made
the following declaration:
“In the celestial glory there are three heavens or
degrees; and in order to obtain the highest, a man must enter in to this
order of the Priesthood (meaning the new and everlasting covenant of
marriage); and if he does not, he cannot obtain it.“He may enter into the other, but that is the end of
his kingdom; he cannot have an increase.“Salvation means a man’s being placed beyond the power
of all his enemies.“The more sure word of prophecy (mentioned by Peter)
means a man’s knowing that he is sealed up unto eternal life, by
revelation and the spirit of prophecy, through the power of the Holy
Priesthood.“It is impossible for a man to be saved in ignorance.
“There is no such thing as immaterial matter. All
spirit is matter, but it is more fine or pure, and can only be discerned
by purer eyes.“We cannot see it; but when our bodies are purified we
shall see that it is all matter.”
The New and Everlasting Covenant
A revelation dealing with the subject of marriage for
eternity, or celestial marriage as it is known, was reduced to writing
July 12, 1843 (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 132). It had been revealed to the
Prophet a long time before this date, but had not been recorded or
publicly announced. In it the Lord defines the “new and everlasting
covenant.” In a number of revelations previously given the new and
everlasting covenant is mentioned, and various principles of the Gospel
are spoken of as new and everlasting covenants. Thus, in the Lord’s
Preface to the Book of Doctrine and Covenants, he says he gave
commandments to Joseph Smith, that his “everlasting covenant might be
established; that the fulness of the Gospel might be proclaimed.”
Immediately after the organization of the Church, he declared that baptism
is a “new and an everlasting covenant, even that which was from the
beginning,” and in a revelation given October 25, 1831 (Doc. and Cov. Sec.
66), the everlasting covenant is defined as the fulness of the Gospel,
“sent forth unto the children of men, that they might have life and be
made partakers of the glories which are to be revealed.” But the full
meaning and significance of the “new and everlasting covenant,” was not
revealed until the Prophet received this revelation (Doc. and Cov. Sec.
132), in which it is defined as follows:
“For behold, I reveal unto you a new and an
everlasting covenant; and if ye abide not that covenant, then are ye
damned; for no one can reject this covenant and be permitted to enter
into my glory. For all who will have a blessing at my hands shall abide
the law which was appointed for that blessing, and the conditions
thereof, as were instituted from before the foundation of the world.”
This reference has bearing on the new covenant of
celestial marriage, or marriage for eternity, spoken of by President
Joseph Smith at Ramus in May, 1843. Then the Lord defines the law of the
new and everlasting covenant, which embraces all other covenants and
principles belonging to the Gospel:
“And as pertaining to the new and everlasting
covenant, it was instituted for the fulness of my glory; and he that
receiveth a fulness thereof must and shall abide the law, or he shall be
damned, saith the Lord God.“And verily I say unto you, that the conditions of
this law are these: All covenants, contracts, bonds, obligations, oaths,
vows, performances, connections, associations, or expectations, that are
not made and entered into and sealed by the Holy Spirit of promise, of
him who is anointed, both as well for time and for all eternity, and
that too most holy, by revelation and commandment through the medium of
mine anointed, whom I have appointed on the earth to hold this power
(and I have appointed unto my servant Joseph to hold this power in the
last days, and there is never but one on the earth at a time on whom
this power and the keys of this priesthood are conferred), are of no
efficacy, virtue, or force in and after the resurrection from the dead;
for all contracts that are not made unto this end have an end when men
are dead.”
Conversely, then, all contracts entered into in this
life, and sealed by this authority, are binding and of force after the
resurrection, as the revelation further on declares:
“Behold, mine house is a house of order, saith the
Lord, and not a house of confusion. Will I accept of an offering, saith
the Lord, that is not made in my name? Or will I receive at your hands
that which I have not appointed? And will I appoint unto you, saith the
Lord, except it be by law, even as I and my Father ordained unto you,
before the world was? I am the Lord thy God; and I give unto you this
commandment—that no man shall come unto the Father but by me or by
my word, which is my law, saith the Lord. And everything that is in the
world, whether it be ordained of men, by thrones, or principalities, or
powers, or things of name, whatsoever they may be, that are not by me or
by my word, saith the Lord, shall be thrown down, and shall not remain
after men are dead, neither in nor after the resurrection, saith the
Lord your God. For whatsoever things remain are by me; and whatsoever
things are not by me shall be shaken and destroyed.”
Revealed by Elijah
The keys of this wonderful and impressive doctrine were
restored when Elijah conferred his Priesthood. The mission of Elijah in
this dispensation, as prophesied of by Malachi, was to restore the
sealing, or binding power, through which covenants and contracts, as here
described by the Lord, are approved and ratified in the heavens. Referring
to this subject, President Joseph Smith remarked in one of his discourses:
“Elijah was the last prophet that held the keys of the
Priesthood. . . . It is true that the Savior had
authority and power to bestow this blessing; but the sons of Levi were
too prejudiced. ‘And I will send Elijah the Prophet before the great and
terrible day of the Lord,’ etc. Why send Elijah? Because he holds the
keys of the authority to administer in all the ordinances of the
Priesthood; and without the authority is given, the ordinances could not
be administered in righteousness.”
Again:
“The spirit, power, and calling of Elijah is, that ye
have power to hold the key of the revelation, ordinances, oracles,
powers and endowments of the fulness of the Melchizedek Priesthood and
of the kingdom of God on the earth; and to receive, obtain and perform
all the ordinances belonging to the kingdom of God, even unto the
turning of the hearts of the fathers unto the children, and the hearts
of the children unto the fathers, even those who are in heaven. .
. . What is this office and work of Elijah? It is one of the
greatest and most important subjects that God has revealed. He should
send Elijah to seal the children to the fathers, and the fathers to the
children.”
In the Temple these Blessings are Obtained
In the temple of the Lord these sealing blessings may be
obtained. Only in the days of poverty, when there is no temple, can they
be received elsewhere. The Prophet added further instruction to this
subject in a discourse, Sunday, June 11, 1843, wherein he said:
“One of the ordinances of the house of the Lord is
baptism for the dead. God decreed before the foundation of the world
that that ordinance should be administered in a font prepared for that
purpose in the house of the Lord.“If a man gets a fulness of the Priesthood of God, he
has to get it in the same way that Jesus Christ obtained it, and that
was by keeping all the commandments and obeying all the ordinances of
the house of the Lord. . . .“All men who become heirs of God and joint-heirs with
Jesus Christ, will have to receive the fulness of the ordinances of his
kingdom; and those who will not receive all the ordinances will come
short of the fulness of that glory, if they do not lose the whole” (Documentary History of the Church, vol. 5:423).
Plural Marriage
This revelation, dated July 12, 1843, also contains the
doctrine of plural wives. This doctrine was made known to the Prophet as
early as the summer of 1831, and by him was taught to a few others, but it
was not practiced until the Lord commanded it. Secrecy was imposed by the
Lord until such time as he saw fit for its introduction. When the Prophet
was commanded to practice this principle, he hesitated and deferred taking
action for some time. To do so was one of the greatest trials of his life.
He knew the doctrine was in conflict with the traditions and teachings of
the world and would arouse increased persecution; moreover, his own
prejudices were in opposition to the doctrine. However, the Lord had
commanded him and he must act.
In Nauvoo the doctrine was revealed to many of the
leading brethren, and wives were sealed to some of them by President
Joseph Smith, and to others, under his direction. However, it was not
until 1852, after the Saints had come to Utah, that the revelation was
published to the world.
The Douglas Prophecy
On the return from Ramus, where the doctrine of the
eternity of marriage was taught to a number of brethren, President Joseph
Smith and his scribe, William Clayton, paid a visit to Judge Stephen A.
Douglas, at Carthage, where he was holding court. On invitation they dined
with Judge Douglas, and after dinner he requested President Smith to
relate the history of the persecutions of the Saints while in Missouri.
This he did in some detail, covering a period of about three hours. He
also gave an account of his visit to Washington, with Judge Elias Higbee
and Sidney Rigdon, in 1839, and their treatment by President Martin Van
Buren, Henry Clay, John C. Calhoun and others. Judge Douglas listened with
the closest attention and deprecated the conduct of Governor Boggs and his
aides in Missouri. He said that any people who would do as the Missourians
had done to the Latter-day Saints ought to be brought to judgment and
punished.
President Smith, in concluding the conversation, uttered
the following prophecy which was recorded in the journal of his secretary,
William Clayton, under date of the event, May 18, 1843:
“Judge, you will aspire to the presidency of the
United States; and if ever you turn your hand against me or the
Latter-day Saints, you will feel the weight of the hand of the Almighty
upon you; and you will live to see and know that I have testified the
truth to you; for the conversation of this day will stick to you through
life.”1
Notes
1. Stephen A. Douglas lived to see the fulfilment
of this prophecy. He did aspire to the presidency of the United States. He
did raise his voice against the Latter-day Saints in a speech delivered in
Springfield, Illinois, June 12, 1857. The speech was published in the
“Missouri Republican.” While Mr. Douglas had more reason to expect to be
elected than any other candidate, he was overwhelmingly defeated, and
Abraham Lincoln was elected President of the United States.
For full particulars in relation to this subject, the
reader is referred to the History of the Mormon Church
, chapter 46, by Elder B. H. Roberts.
Chapter 33
Conspiracy Against Joseph Smith
When John C. Bennett wrote to Sidney Rigdon and Orson
Pratt, saying he was on his way to Missouri to obtain a new requisition
for Joseph Smith and others, it was not an idle threat. Not many weeks had
passed before reports reached Nauvoo that new indictments had been found
against President Smith, based on the old Missouri charges, and that John
C. Bennett was making desperate threats. Moreover, Bennett must have had
some definite information which caused him to say that Governor Ford would
acknowledge the new requisition. A conspiracy, evidently, was on foot, in
which the governors of the two states were to play their parts. Further
evidence that Governor Ford was a party to the conspiracy is discovered in
a communication dated June 10, 1843, from Sam C. Owens of Independence, to
the governor of Illinois. Owens, one of the bitterest persecutors of the
Saints in Missouri, stated in his letter that John C. Bennett had
authorized him to write to Governor Ford, “without hesitation” in regard
to the charges against Joseph Smith. “At the last term of the circuit
court of Daviess County,” he wrote, “an indictment was found by the grand
jury against Joseph Smith for treason against the state,” and necessary
papers were on the way to Governor Thomas Reynolds, who, on receipt
thereof, would issue a requisition, and Mr. Joseph H. Reynolds would be
sent as a special agent “to attend to the business.” Owens also said that
“Dr. Bennett further writes that he has made an agreement with Harmon T.
Wilson, of Hancock County (Carthage seat of justice), in whose hands he
wishes the writ that shall be issued by you to be put. From the tenor of
his letter I am induced to believe that he has made the same suggestion to
you.”
A Warrant for His Arrest
June 13, 1843, Governor Reynolds issued the requisition
and Joseph H. Reynolds was dispatched to Illinois. Governor Ford lost no
time in issuing the warrant for the arrest and placed it in the hands of
Harmon T. Wilson, who, with Reynolds, immediately started for their
prisoner. The night before the warrant was issued Governor Ford
incidentally remarked to Judge James Adams that the next day he would
issue such a writ. Judge Adams sent an express at once to Nauvoo to warn
the Prophet of impending danger. His message arrived in the evening of
Sunday, June 18, but President Smith was not at home. On the 13th, he and
his family had gone north to visit with Mrs. Wasson, sister of Emma Smith,
who resided near Dixon, Lee County, Illinois. Hyrum Smith sent William
Clayton and Stephen Markham on horse back with all speed to warn his
brother Joseph. They arrived at Wasson’s on the afternoon of Wednesday,
June 21, a distance of two hundred and twelve miles. Hearing their report,
Joseph said: “I have no fear. I shall not leave here; I shall find
friends, and Missourians cannot hurt me, I tell you in the name of the
Lord.” He cancelled an appointment to preach in Dixon, and concluded to
remain with the Wassons, fearing that if he started for home he might fall
into the hands of his enemies where he had no friends.
His Arrest by Reynolds and Wilson
From some source Reynolds and Wilson learned that Joseph
was at Dixon and thither they went with haste. On the way to Wasson’s they
passed William Clayton, who had been sent to spy out the land, but as they
were disguised, Clayton did not know them. Arriving at their destination
the sheriffs represented themselves to be “Mormon” elders and were
directed to the Wasson home. President Smith was in the yard when they
arrived. Springing upon him like fiends, and without showing any papers
for his arrest, they pointed cocked pistols at his head and with many vile
oaths, threatened to shoot him if he stirred. They repeatedly jabbed the
muzzles of their pistols in his ribs, and were for hurrying him off to
Dixon without giving him a chance to say farewell to his family or
friends, or obtain his hat and coat. Stephen Markham grabbed the horses by
the bits and held them saying: “There is no law on earth that requires a
sheriff to take a prisoner without his clothes.” They threatened to shoot
him, but he paid no heed to their threats, and Emma Smith brought her
husband his hat and coat. As the wagon rolled away, Joseph called to
Markham to go to Dixon and secure a writ of habeas corpus. On the way the
officers repeatedly thrust their pistols in the Prophet’s sides with
accompanying oaths of blasphemy, and did not desist until shortly before
reaching Dixon, when Markham, who had overtaken them, upbraided them for
their cowardice and brutal treatment of their prisoner, who was
defenseless.
Arriving at Dixon, the officers placed their prisoner in
a room of the tavern, and ordered fresh horses to be ready in five
minutes. Joseph asked them if he could interview counsel, but was cruelly
treated for his request. A man passed the window and the Prophet shouted
to him to secure him a lawyer, for he was falsely imprisoned. Attorney
Edward Southwick came to the door, but it was shut in his face, with a
threat. Shepherd G. Patrick, another attorney, also came and was insulted
in like manner. The neighborhood was soon aroused, and Mr. Dixon, owner of
the house, with some friends surrounded the door and threatened violence
to the inhuman sheriffs if they did not alter their brutal course. This
had a sobering effect upon them, and lawyers Southwick and Patrick came
into the room. President Smith showed them his bruised sides, and asked
them to obtain a writ of habeas corpus. A messenger was sent by Mr. Dixon
to Mr. Chamberlain, master-in-chancery, who lived some six miles away, and
another messenger was sent for Attorney Cyrus Walker, who happened to be
campaigning near that place. Walker, Whig candidate for Congress, said he
would come provided Joseph Smith would promise to vote for him, which the
latter said he would do. This promise, Walker thought, would give him the
united vote of the “Mormon” people, which would insure his election. About
eight o’clock the master-in-chancery arrived and issued a writ of habeas
corpus returnable before Judge John D. Caton, of the ninth judicial
district, at Ottawa, which was served on Reynolds and Wilson. The same day
William Clayton was sent by the Prophet to notify his brother Hyrum, and
get assistance.
Reynolds and Wilson Under Arrest
Stephen Markham went before a justice of the peace and
obtained a warrant for Reynolds and Wilson for threatening his life. He
later obtained other warrants from the circuit court of Lee County against
them for threatening the life of Joseph Smith, and for false imprisonment,
claiming ten thousand dollars damages, on the ground that the writ issued
by Governor Ford was a void writ in law. As they could not obtain bondsmen
outside of Missouri, they were taken into custody by Sheriff Campbell of
Lee County. They also obtained a writ of habeas corpus and under these
circumstances the entire party, including the lawyers and Mr. Dixon,
started for Ottawa.
President Joseph Smith’s Discourse at Pawpaw Grove
Saturday night, June 24, they arrived at Pawpaw Grove,
thirty-two miles distant from Dixon, and the following morning the people
assembled at the hotel and requested that the Prophet preach. To this
Reynolds objected, saying that Joseph Smith was his prisoner, and the
people must disperse. They had witnessed his abuse of his prisoner, and a
Mr. David Town, an aged gentleman, who was lame, advanced and gave
Reynolds to understand that he could not interrupt gentlemen. Bringing his
heavy walking stick down with a thud, he said:
“You—Infernal puke, we’ll learn you to come here
and interrupt gentlemen. Sit down there (pointing to a very low chair),
and sit still. Don’t open your head till General Smith gets through
talking. If you never learned manners in Missouri, we’ll teach you that
gentlemen are not to be imposed upon by a nigger-driver. You cannot
kidnap men here, if you do in Missouri; and if you attempt it here,
there’s a committee in this grove that will sit on your case; and, sir,
it is the highest tribunal in the United States, as
from its decision there is no appeal!”
Reynolds very meekly and in fear took the seat while
President Smith addressed the people for one hour and a half.
The Issuing of New Writs
It was learned that Judge Caton was in New York, so they
all returned to Dixon, where new writs were obtained, made returnable
before the nearest tribunal in the fifth judicial district, at Markham’s
request. Provision was now made to go to Quincy, where Judge Stephen A.
Douglas was holding court. Twice on the way Reynolds and Wilson engaged in
plots to raise mobs and carry Joseph Smith to the mouth of Rock River
where there was a company from Missouri waiting to receive him; but each
time the plans were discovered and foiled.
On the way Joseph convinced Sheriff Campbell and the
attorneys that the court of Nauvoo was nearer than that of Quincy, and had
full power to try his case, and hither they bent their way. Reynolds and
Wilson endeavored to get Sheriff Campbell, who had them in custody, to go
by way of Rock River, to Quincy, not knowing that their plots were
discovered, saying that they would never go through Nauvoo alive. Joseph
Smith pledged his word of honor that they would not be molested, and the
journey was resumed by land in the direction of Nauvoo.
A Party to the Rescue
William Clayton arrived in Nauvoo on Sunday, June 25,
1843, and at the afternoon meeting in the temple Hyrum Smith requested to
see all the brethren. He informed them of his brother Joseph’s arrest, and
called for volunteers to go to his assistance. That evening a company of
about one hundred and seventy-five men left on horseback. Wilson Law
refused to go unless his expenses could be met, whereupon President
Brigham Young went to work and raised seven hundred dollars by
subscription. About seventy-five men on board the
Maid of Iowa, under Captain Dan Jones, went down the Mississippi to
the mouth of the Illinois River, thence up that river toward Peoria, to
examine the steamboats, suspecting the Prophet might be forced on one of
them to be carried down the river to Missouri.
Shortly after the party with the Prophet left Geneseo on
the 27th, the advance guard of the brethren, nine in all, from Nauvoo came
up, and Reynolds and Wilson began to tremble fearing for their lives.
Reynolds asked if “Jim” Flack was in the crowd. When he was informed that
he would be present the next day, the criminal sheriff replied: “Then I am
a dead man; for I know him of old.” When Stephen Markham, who had gone to
locate the brethren from Nauvoo, rode up, Reynolds said, “Do I meet you as
a friend? I expected to be a dead man when I met you again,” but he was
assured that he would not be hurt. Thursday, June 29, James Flack with
others of the brethren met the company a short distance south of Monmouth.
President Joseph Smith took Flack to one side and charged him not to harm
Reynolds, for he had given his word of honor that he would not be injured.
This Flack promised to do although he had cause for vengeance.
Arrival at Nauvoo
Other bodies of men from Nauvoo joined the company from
time to time and when they reached that place there were about one hundred
and forty riding on horse back, who were joined by the populace in
procession and thus they marched into the town. President Smith was
greeted with cheers and the firing of cannon. He was still a prisoner in
the hands of Reynolds and Wilson, and they in turn were prisoners in the
hands of Sheriff Campbell. The Prophet took them to his house and placed
Reynolds and Wilson at the head of the table, where about fifty persons
were served. This was a very different reception from the one he had
received from these men when they took him prisoner in Lee County, at the
Wasson home.
The Trial Before the Municipal Court
The same day they arrived in Nauvoo the municipal court
convened, and a requisition was made on Reynolds to return the writ, but
he refused to recognize the summons, whereupon the Prophet petitioned the
court for a writ of habeas corpus to be directed to Reynolds, commanding
him to bring his prisoner before the court. The summons was issued and
Reynolds complied with the attachment and delivered the Prophet into the
hands of the marshal of the city. That afternoon President Smith addressed
the people at great length, declaring that he would not peacefully submit
again to such ill-treatment. While he was speaking Reynolds and Wilson
with a lawyer named Davis, of Carthage, left for that place threatening to
raise the militia and come again and take President Smith out of Nauvoo.
Saturday, July 1, 1843, the court convened to examine
the writ of habeas corpus. Messrs. Cyrus Walker, Shepherd G. Patrick,
Edward Southwick and a Mr. Backman defended Joseph Smith while Attorney
Mason was counselor for Reynolds. Witnesses were examined and the case
tried on its merits, Hyrum Smith, Parley P. Pratt, Brigham Young, George
W. Pitkin, Lyman Wight and Sidney Rigdon giving testimony, at the
conclusion of which the prisoner was discharged.
The Citizens of Lee County Thanked
July 1, 1843, a mass meeting of the citizens of Nauvoo
was held in the assembly hall and it was “unanimously resolved that
Messrs. Sager and Dixon, of the town of Dixon, and the citizens of Dixon,
Pawpaw Grove, and Lee County, receive the warmest thanks for the firm
patriotism, bold and decided stand taken against lawless outrage and the
spirit of mobocracy, as manifested in the arrest or capture of General
Joseph Smith, while on a visit to his friends in that district of country.”
Reynolds’ Further Attempt to Obtain Joseph Smith
The proceedings of the municipal court of Nauvoo in this
case were promptly forwarded to Governor Ford, with affidavits from the
attorneys and others bearing upon the case and the kindly treatment
Reynolds and Wilson had received in Nauvoo. Judge James Adams came from
Carthage with the information that Reynolds and Wilson were exciting the
people there to mobocracy, and petitioning the governor for a posse
forcibly to take Joseph Smith, on the grounds that he had been unlawfully
taken out of their hands. A remonstrance against the Carthage proceedings
was prepared and forwarded to Carthage by Messrs. Southwick and Patrick,
and a petition was sent to Governor Ford praying him not to issue any more
writs.
Governor Ford refused to comply with the request of
Sheriff Reynolds, and subsequently, when Governor Reynolds of Missouri
requested him to call out the militia—a method they had of doing in
Missouri—to retake Joseph Smith, Governor Ford replied that Joseph
Smith had been tried before the municipal court of Nauvoo on a writ of
habeas corpus, and discharged from arrest. He, as governor, had fully
executed the duty which the laws imposed, and had not “been resisted
either in the writ issued for the arrest of Smith or in the person of the
officer appointed to apprehend him,” and the constitution would not permit
him to take such action, as the Missouri official proposed.
The Case of O. P. Rockwell
Orrin Porter Rockwell, who was accused as the principal
in the shooting of ex-Governor Boggs, went into retirement with the
Prophet when Governor Ford issued papers for his extradition. He traveled
east as far as New Jersey where he remained for some time. Following the
discharge of President Joseph Smith by Judge Pope, Rockwell concluded to
return to Nauvoo, evidently by way of the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers. In
St. Louis he was recognized by Elias Parker who had him placed under
arrest, March 4, 1843. They carried him to Independence in chains, where
he was placed under bonds in the sum of five thousand dollars, which they
knew he could not raise, as no person outside of Missouri would be
accepted by the court as bondsman. In the custody of the notorious Joseph
H. Reynolds, sheriff of Jackson County, he was cast into prison bound hand
and foot. Here he remained a prisoner for eight months. March 15, 1843,
the Prophet wrote: “I prophesied in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ,
that Orrin Porter Rockwell would get away honorably from the Missourians.”
On Christmas evening, 1843—the last Christmas day
Joseph and Hyrum Smith celebrated on earth—a large party assembled
at the Prophet’s home, and spent the time in music, dancing and a social
visit. During the festivities, a man with long shaggy hair, apparently
drunk, came in and acted like a Missourian. A scuffle ensued and the
Prophet had an opportunity to see the stranger’s face. To his great
surprise and joy he discovered his “long-tried, warm, but cruelly
persecuted friend, Orrin Porter Rockwell.” The party came to order while
Rockwell related in detail his experiences and sufferings while in
Missouri.
Orrin P. Rockwell’s Story
The story is too long to tell in full at this point. It
is sufficient to relate the following incidents. When he arrived in
Independence a large crowd had gathered and suggested hanging him at once,
but he was placed in jail. In two or three days he underwent a mock trial,
where false witnesses testified against him. The magistrate said he found
no evidence against him, but placed him in prison for safe keeping, where
Sheriff Reynolds chained him hand and foot. One time he was able to
escape, but was recaptured and only by the providence of the Lord was
saved from being hanged. About the time that President Smith was demanded
by the governor of Missouri, Reynolds, the sheriff, came to Rockwell and
said that he had discovered from letters that Joseph Smith had unlimited
confidence in Rockwell, and if Rockwell would only “tote him out by riding
or any other way,” so that the Missourians might apprehend him, Rockwell
might please himself whether he stayed in Illinois or returned to
Missouri, they would protect him, and any pile that he would name the
citizens of Jackson County, would club together and raise. “You only
deliver Joe Smith into our hands, and name your pile.” Rockwell replied:
“I will see you all damned first, and then I won’t.”
The time of further trial was continually delayed, but
on the 13th of December, he was taken before the court and tried—not
on the charge of shooting Boggs, but for breaking jail! He was found
guilty and sentenced to “five minutes’ imprisonment in the county jail,”
but was kept there five hours, while his enemies tried to think of some
other charge to make against him. He was finally released and with great
difficulty made his way to Nauvoo, where he arrived that Christmas night.
Chapter 34
Conspiracy
Threats of the Mob
Following the unsuccessful attempt to carry President
Joseph Smith into Missouri, the hatred of his enemies became intense.
Lying accusations were published in anti-“Mormon” papers and circulated
against the Saints. Threats were made, both in Missouri and Illinois, of
mob attacks and the legion was kept in readiness to withstand any mob
assault. The governor was apprised of these conditions from time to time,
and petitioned for protection, but refused to give credence to the rumors,
or take any measures to repel any proposed invasion. This attitude
increased the boldness of the enemies of the Saints, who declared, in
reference to the governor, should he attempt to protect the “Mormons” in
their rights: “If he opens his head we will punch a hole through him! He
dare not speak! We will serve him the same sauce we will the ‘Mormons!’”
Growth of Nauvoo
Through the gathering of converts from Great Britain as
well as from various parts of the United States, Nauvoo had become the
foremost city of Illinois. It had risen from a swamp and wilderness in
1839, to a commonwealth of some twenty thousand souls. The people were
frugal, industrious and law-abiding. Many factories had been established,
and measures were on foot, at the suggestion of President Smith, to dam
the Mississippi for water power purposes. He also suggested that Congress
be petitioned to build a canal around the Des Moines rapids to admit of
the passage of boats for commercial purposes.1 He instructed the
Saints to be producers and to manufacture from the raw materials, rather
than to be consumers only, and under his direction and inspiration the
city prospered.
Jealousy of Other Towns
All this augmented the jealousy and hatred of the
neighboring towns, where thrift and unity were lacking. Another thing that
increased the opposition, especially of the politicians, was the fact that
the Saints usually voted as a unit. It was this tendency which caused
Cyrus Walker to seek the favor of Joseph Smith in the summer of 1843.
However, the voting of the “Mormons” in this manner was not due to
instruction from the leading councils of the Church, but from necessity
and for self-preservation. Both the Whig and the Democratic office-seekers
sought the support of the Saints, and when it was not forthcoming, hatred
filled their breasts, and vengeance was threatened. The constant arrival
of immigrants, who were instructed to gather at Nauvoo, was also looked
upon as an attempt to lay plans to control the state. So strong were the
Latter-day Saints that they held the balance of power in the elections and
naturally threw their support to those most friendly to them, which
aroused the animosities of their opponents to a murderous degree.
In the August (1843) election Robert D. Foster and
George W. Thatcher were elected to county offices. They went to Carthage
to give bonds and take their oaths and were threatened by Harmon T. Wilson
and some fifteen or twenty others, who were armed with knives and pistols.
The bonds, however, were accepted, and the mob gave notice of a meeting of
anti-“Mormons” to consider the question of the “Mormons” holding office.
At their meeting they made all manner of accusations and threats, stating
that they “pledge themselves in the most determined manner” to aid
Missouri should another demand be made for Joseph Smith, which gave
encouragement to the enemies of the Saints within that state.
Near the close of the year 1843, they openly resorted to
mob violence. Daniel Avery and his son Philander, were kidnapped and
delivered to the Missourians. On false accusations they were imprisoned
and brutally treated for some time. The son finally made his escape and
the father was later released on habeas corpus proceedings.
Joseph Smith and the Presidency of the United States
From the time of the organization of the Church the
Saints had suffered most cruelly at the hands of enemies. Governors and
lesser state dignitaries, had aided in the persecutions. No redress, even
from the government of the United States, could be obtained. Mobs still
menaced them, and their chances for protection by lawful means were not
the best, for the governor of Illinois was intimidated by mob threats. It
was agreed, therefore, to inquire of the various candidates for the
presidency of the United States what their feelings would be, if elected,
towards the Latter-day Saints, and their course of action in relation to
the cruel oppression the Saints had suffered. Accordingly letters were
sent to the leading candidates. Only two, Henry Clay and John C. Calhoun,
deigned to make reply. Their answers were so unsatisfactory that the
“Mormon” people decided they could vote for neither of them. Clay replied
that if he ever entered that high office he must go into it free and
unfettered, with no guarantees but such as were to be drawn from his whole
life, character and conduct, although he had sympathized with the Saints
in their sufferings under injustice. Calhoun was more frank, stating that
the case of the Saints in Missouri, candor compelled him to say, “did not
come within the jurisdiction of the Federal Government, which is one of
limited and specific powers.”
Under these conditions the citizens of Nauvoo felt that
the only consistent step they could take was to place their own candidate
in the field. Consequently, at a political convention held in Nauvoo,
January 29, 1844, Joseph Smith was nominated as a candidate for the
presidency of the United States, and on May 17, a state convention was
held in Nauvoo where his nomination was sustained. There was no thought on
the part of President Joseph Smith or the Saints that he would be elected,
but it gave to them an opportunity to express their feelings, and to
sustain a candidate who would advocate their rights against oppression. In
the Times and Seasons (Feb. 15) an editorial was
published entitled: “Who Shall be our Next President?” in which the
reasons for selecting their own candidate were clearly and emphatically
stated by the editor (John Taylor) in behalf of the Latter-day Saints.
James Arlington Bennett, of New York, was asked to
become their candidate for the vice-presidency, but as he was born in
Ireland, was not eligible. Sidney Rigdon, who had moved from Nauvoo to
Pittsburgh—contrary to revelation and to the feelings of the Prophet
—was selected for that place.
Views on the Powers and Policy of the Government
In February, 1844, Joseph Smith published to the world
his “Views on the Powers and Policy of the Government of the United
States.” After speaking of the greatness and glory of the United States
under the early presidents he says that “‘since the fathers have fallen
asleep,’ wicked and designing men have unrobed the government of its
glory.” He advocated the reduction of the number of congressmen by
two-thirds; the pardoning of prisoners in state prisons; the making of
laws to provide for useful employment of prisoners on roads, public works
or elsewhere, where they may be taught more wisdom and more virtue, and
only murderers should be confined or put to death. He would turn the
prisons into seminaries of learning; and petition the inhabitants of the
slave states to abolish slavery by 1850, or before, “and save the
abolitionist from reproach and ruin, infamy and shame.” This should be
done by Congress paying every man a reasonable price for his slaves out of
the revenue from the sale of public lands, and deducted pay from members
of Congress, that liberty may be granted to all men. He would abolish the
practice of trying men by court martial for desertion, and if a man
deserts send him his pay with instructions that his country will never
trust him more and that he has forfeited his honor. Make honor the
standard with all men; render good for evil, “and the whole nation, like a
kingdom of kings and priests, will rise up in righteousness.” He advocated
more economy; less taxes; greater equality, and less distinction among the
people. Also the establishment of a national bank, with branches in each
state and territory, the net revenue therefrom to be applied to government
interests. The president should have full power to send an army to
suppress mobs, and there should be a repeal of the requirement for
governors to petition the president for troops in cases of invasion or
rebellion. A governor himself may be a mobber and power should be given
the president to protect citizens in such an event. Oregon, by right, and
with the consent of the Indian, should belong to the United States, and he
would invite Texas, Canada, Mexico, to join the sons of liberty, and let
the Union spread.
Such, in brief, is the platform of Joseph Smith, and
when it was circulated throughout the United States, it created much
commotion and favorable comment for its direct and fearless advocacy of
principles which other candidates, for policy’s sake, dared not express.
The Contemplated Expedition to the West
The rising tide of persecution portended a repetition of
the cruel Missouri scenes. President Joseph Smith knew full well, even in
the face of continued urging of the Saints to build Nauvoo and make her
towers glorious, that the time would come when they would have to seek a
new home in the wilderness. The prophecy of August 6, 1842, had stamped
this fact upon the minds of others, and the Prophet had referred to it
from time to time. He records in his history under date of February 20,
1844, the following:
“I instructed the Twelve Apostles to send out a
delegation and investigate the locations of California and Oregon, and
hunt out a good location, where we can remove to after the temple is
completed, and where we can build a city in a day, and have a government
of our own, get up into the mountains, where the devil cannot dig us
out, and live in a healthful climate, where we can live as old as we
have a mind to.”
The next day another meeting was held in the mayor’s
office, in Nauvoo, most of the twelve were present, and Jonathan Dunham,
Phineas H. Young, David D. Yearsley, and David Fullmer, volunteered to go.
Alphonzo Young, James Emmett, George D. Watt and Daniel Spencer were
requested to go, and another meeting was called to meet on February 23, to
further discuss matters pertaining to this expedition. On that date
President Smith and the twelve met again. Patriarch Hyrum Smith and Sidney
Rigdon were also present. The Prophet instructed them saying he wanted an
exploration of all the mountain country. Perhaps it would be best for them
to go by way of Santa Fe. “Send twenty-five men,” he said, “let them
preach the Gospel wherever they go. Let that man go that can raise $500, a
good horse and mule, a double-barrel gun, one barrel rifle and the other
smooth bore, a saddle and bridle, a pair of revolving pistols,
bowie-knife, and a good sabre. Appoint a leader and let them beat up for
volunteers. I want every man that goes to be a king and a priest. When he
gets on the mountains he may want to talk with his God; when with the
savage nations, have power to govern. If we don’t get volunteers, wait
till after the election.” On this occasion, Samuel Bent, Joseph A.
Kelting, Samuel Rolf, Daniel Avery and Samuel W. Richards were added to
the expedition and others joined from time to time. Sunday, February 25,
the Prophet predicted that within five years the Saints would be out of
the power of their old enemies, whether they were apostate or of the
world, and commanded the brethren to write it down “that when it comes to
pass they need not say they had forgotten the saying.”
Memorial to Congress
March 26, 1844, a memorial was prepared by President
Joseph Smith asking Congress to pass an ordinance for the protection of
citizens of the United States emigrating to the territories and that
indefinite country known as California and Oregon. He asked for
authorization to raise a company of one hundred thousand volunteers, at
such times and places as he might find necessary for this purpose. At this
time Oregon was a disputed territory, unsettled, and held by the United
States and Great Britain jointly by treaty. Texas was asking for admission
into the United States, but had been denied. Orson Pratt and John E. Page
and later Orson Hyde, were sent to Washington to urge the consideration of
the scheme. Most of the Illinois delegation favored it. For political
reasons no official action was ever taken, but the general sentiment of
the politicians, who were afraid to act openly, was in favor of the
proposition.
Traitors From Within
It was not so much from Missouri and among the mobocrats
of Illinois, that the Prophet had cause to fear, but from traitors within
the councils of the Church. In the highest quorums, men were found who
secretly plotted against his life. He remarked in a discourse in October
of 1843: “This generation is as corrupt as the generation of the Jews that
crucified Christ; and if he were here today, and should preach the same
doctrine he did to them they would put him to death. I defy all the world
to destroy the work of God; and I prophesy they never will have power to
kill me till my work is accomplished, and I am ready
to die.” In January, 1844, it became necessary to increase the police
force for the protection of the city. Joseph Smith, as mayor, addressed
these newly appointed officers of the peace, and instructed them in their
duties. In the course of his remarks he said:
“I am exposed to far greater danger from traitors
among ourselves than from enemies without, although my life has been
sought for many years by the civil and military authorities, priests,
and people of Missouri; and if I can escape from the ungrateful
treachery of assassins, I can live as Caesar might have lived, were it
not for a right-hand Brutus. I have had pretended friends betray me. All
the enemies upon the face of the earth may roar and exert all their
power to bring about my death, but they can accomplish nothing, unless
some who are among us and enjoy our society, have been with us in our
councils, participated in our confidence, taken us by the hand, called
us brother, saluted us with a kiss, join with our enemies, turn our
virtues into faults, and, by falsehood and deceit, stir up their wrath
and indignation against us, and bring their united vengeance upon our
heads. All the hue-and-cry of the chief priests and elders against the
Savior, could not bring down the wrath of the Jewish nation upon his
head, and thereby cause the crucifixion of the Son of God, until Judas
said unto them, ‘Whomsoever I shall kiss, he is the man; hold him fast.’
Judas was one of the Twelve Apostles, even their treasurer, and dipt
with their Master in the dish, and through his treachery, the
crucifixion was brought about; and we have a Judas
in our midst.”
“The Wicked Flee”
These remarks gave offense to William and Wilson Law,
William Marks, Leonard Soby, Dr. Foster and others. William Law was the
Prophet’s second counselor, and his brother had been honored with the
position of major general of the Nauvoo Legion, and was also prominent in
the Church. William Marks was president of the Nauvoo Stake of Zion.
Commenting on their fears, President Joseph Smith stated: “What can be the
matter with these men? Is it that the wicked flee when no man pursueth .
. . or that Presidents Law and Marks are absolutely traitors to
the Church, that my remarks should produce such excitement in their minds?
Can it be possible that the traitor whom Porter Rockwell reports to me as
being in correspondence with my Missouri enemies is one of my quorum?2
The people in the town are astonished, almost every man saying
to his neighbor, “Is it possible that Brother Law or Marks is a traitor,
and would deliver Brother Joseph into the hands of his enemies in
Missouri? If not what can be the meaning of all this? The righteous are
bold as a lion.”
Councils of Apostates
It soon developed that some of these men were secretly
plotting the death of the Prophet and the destruction of the Church,
claiming that he had fallen from his high and holy calling. Among them
were those who had been tinctured by the wickedness of John C. Bennett,
from which they did not recover. Others had been guilty of immoral conduct
within more recent months and had been exposed. Their vengeance was
directed against President Joseph Smith towards whom they now entertained
a murderous spirit.
Experience of Scott and Harris
In the spring of 1844, a number of secret meetings were
held by these conspirators, to which all whom they could trust among the
disaffected spirits, were invited. Two young men, Denison L. Harris and
Robert Scott, the latter living with the family of William Law, were
invited to attend. Young Harris was also asked to invite his father, Emer
Harris. The boys pondered over the invitation and then consulted with Emer
Harris, who concluded to lay the matter before President Joseph Smith.
After hearing the story the Prophet advised the father to stay away, but
said he would like to have the boys attend, but they must first receive
some advice from him. As they were instructed, they attended the first two
meetings and each time made their report to the Prophet. These gatherings
were given over to abuse and falsehood affecting President Smith, and the
discussion of future plans. When the young men reported the second time,
Joseph was in doubt whether they should go again and asked them to visit
him for further instructions just before the third meeting, which, like
the others, was to be held on the Sabbath day. When the time came he said
to them: “This will be the last time that they will admit you into their
councils. They will come to some determination, but be sure that you make
no covenant, nor enter into any obligations whatever with them.” Arriving
at the place of meeting the young men were astonished to see it guarded by
men with muskets, and after due scrutiny they were admitted. In the
meeting the Prophet and his brother Hyrum and others were accused of the
most wicked acts. Joseph was called a fallen prophet, and his death was
said to be necessary to save the Church. An oath had been prepared which
each member present was required to take. The candidate would step forward
to the table, where Francis M. Higbee, a justice of the peace, was
stationed, and he would ask: “Are you ready?” Receiving a favorable reply
he administered the following oath:
“You solemnly swear, before God and all holy angels, and
these your brethren by whom you are surrounded that you will give your
life, your liberty, your influence, your all, for the destruction of
Joseph Smith and his party, so help you God!”
The person being sworn would then say “I do,” after
which he would lay down the Bible on which the oath was taken, and sign
his name to a written copy of the oath in a book, which would then be
acknowledged by the justice of the peace.
The boys sat in amazement wondering how these men,
formerly faithful in the councils of the Church, could fall so low. In
this manner the oath was administered to about two hundred, among whom
were three women, heavily veiled.
Their Lives Threatened
Presently the turn for the two youths came to take the
pledge, and they both manfully refused, stating that Joseph Smith had done
them no harm and they were too young to understand these things. This
aroused the anger of the conspirators, and when coaxing and argument
failed, they threatened them with death. “Come boys,” they said, “do as we
have done. You are young, and will not have anything to do in the affair,
but we want you should keep it a secret, and act with us; that’s all.”
“No,” they replied, “we cannot take an oath like that against any man who
has never done us any injury.” They tried to pass out, but one of the band
stopped them saying: “No, not by a—! You know all our plans and
arrangements, and we don’t propose that you should leave in that style.
You’ve got to take the oath, or you’ll never leave here alive.” The boys
were surrounded by these evil conspirators, who with drawn swords and
knives, were determined to take their lives. The leaders, no less
determined, concluded that the deed of blood could not be committed there,
as the house was too near the street. So the young men were taken to the
cellar and preparations were made for their murder. At this point,
however, as if by an act of Providence, someone spoke up and said it was
evidently known by the parents of these boys that they were there, and if
they did not return a search would be put on foot that might prove to be
very dangerous to the plotters. The result was that after some
consultation they were released, with a strict injunction, and many
threats, not to reveal to any one what they had heard, or they would be
killed, and under a guard they were permitted to depart. They immediately
took their course towards the river in the opposite direction from their
homes, conveying the impression to their enemies by word and act, that
they would keep their secret. On the river bank they met the Prophet and
an elder brother of Robert Scott, and to them they told their story (Contributor, vol. 5:25).
On the 27th day of March, 1844, Abiathar B. Williams and
M. G. Eaton, each made affidavit before Daniel H. Wells, justice of
the peace, confirming the story of these young men, and implicating
Chauncy L. Higbee, Robert D. Foster, Joseph H. Jackson and Wilson and
William Law, as the leaders among the plotters. Shortly afterwards (April
18, 1844) the two Laws and Robert D. Foster, were excommunicated from the
Church. Others prominent in this conspiracy were Austin Cowles, Francis M.
Higbee, Charles Ivins and Charles A. Foster.
Apostates Attempt to Organize a Church
An attempt was made by these apostates to organize a
church of their own, patterned after the Church of Christ, with William
Law at the head. Their following was small and the attempt was a failure.
They soon joined hands openly with the most bitter enemies of the Saints
and aided them in all their anti-“Mormon” persecutions. They advocated the
repeal of the Nauvoo Charter; insulted the officers of the city and
maliciously violated the ordinances, endeavoring to bring the city into
ill-repute. Their evil deeds they laid at the door of others, and with
lying tongues made brutal accusations against the innocent, and openly
threatened the life of the Prophet.
Plot to Kill Joseph Smith
May 25, 1844, William Law, Robert D. Foster and Joseph
H. Jackson, had Joseph Smith indicted at Carthage on the charge of
polygamy and perjury. Two days later Joseph left for Carthage, accompanied
by a number of his friends, and voluntarily gave himself up for trial. He
secured legal assistance and endeavored to have his case tried, but the
opposition insisted on the case going over until the next term of court.
On the way to Carthage, Charles A. Foster overtook the Prophet and his
company, and had some conversation. When they reached their destination
Foster called Joseph Smith aside and informed him of a conspiracy against
his life. His brother Robert D., with tears in his eyes, also said there
were persons there who had planned to kill the Prophet before he left that
town. The spark of repentance kindled in their breasts, however, soon died
out, and these two men again banded with the conspirators in Nauvoo, to
bring to pass the death of Joseph and Hyrum Smith.
The “Nauvoo Expositor”
To better advance their malicious course, the
conspirators of Nauvoo procured a press and proposed the publishing of a
paper to be called the Nauvoo Expositor. The
object of the paper, as set forth in the prospectus was, to advocate “the unconditional repeal of the Nauvoo City Charter,
to restrain and correct the abuses of the unit power
, to ward off the iron rod which is held over the devoted heads of
the citizens of Nauvoo . . . to advocate an
unmitigated disobedience to political revelations, and to censure and
decry gross moral imperfections wherever found, either in plebeian,
patrician or self-constituted Monarch—to
advocate the pure principles of morality.” In plain words to attack the
Church and destroy the protection of the Saints guaranteed by the Charter
of Nauvoo.
The first and only number of the
Expositor appeared June 7, 1844, filled with vile and malicious
slanders against the Prophet and the leading citizens of Nauvoo. In
attacking the charter, these wicked conspirators knew they were taking a
course which would gain them the sympathy and aid of all the enemies of
the Church, as nothing else could do. The charter, with its liberal
provisions, had aroused the hatred of anti-“Mormons” because it prevented
their sinister and diabolical designs. These same evil actors had lived
under the charter from the beginning, and had been loud in its praise and
defense, until Satan entered their hearts and their minds became darkened.
They knew that the Latter-day Saints, without the charter would be a prey
to their enemies, and at the mercy of their apostate persecutors, the
small minority of the population, who could wreak vengeance upon their
former brethren without restraint.
The circulation of the first number of this paper filled
the hearts of the people with righteous indignation. Their liberty was
attacked, their lives threatened, and the prospect, from the circulation
of falsehoods within their city, and bitter hatred without, was another
expulsion from their homes. Were they to submit peaceably to such attacks?
The Expositor Declared a Nuisance
At a meeting of the city council held June 10, after
full consideration, the Expositor was declared a
public nuisance and was ordered to be abated. The city marshal John P.
Greene was instructed to proceed to the printing office and carry out the
order of the council. Taking with him a few men he proceeded to inform the
proprietors of his mission and demanded entrance into the building which
was denied. With little effort he opened the door, pied the type, carried
out the press and burned the printed papers that were found. He then
reported to the mayor who immediately forwarded an account of the
proceeding to the governor of Illinois.
In a rage the conspirators set fire to the building and
hastened to Carthage, stating that their lives were in danger and they had
been driven from their homes. The fire was discovered and extinguished
before any damage had been done, but the falsehoods circulated aroused the
people of Carthage and other towns. Indignation meetings were held and
mobs began to gather under arms.
Notes
Such a canal was built, and completed in 1877, at a cost to the
government of more than four million dollars.
It was later discovered that William Law was in league with the
Missourians.
Chapter 35
Charge of Francis M. Higbee
June 11, 1844, Francis M. Higbee made complaint before
Thomas Morrison, a justice of the peace at Carthage, charging Joseph Smith
and the members of the Nauvoo city council with riot committed in
destroying the press of the Expositor. The
warrant was served by Constable David Bettisworth the following day. It
required that the accused should go before the justice issuing the
warrant, “or some other justice of the peace, for trial.” The Prophet
expressed his willingness to go before some other justice, as he had
lawful right to do, but was not willing to be taken to Carthage to be
tried before his mobocratic enemies. Bettisworth, in anger, declared that
he would take him to Carthage. His attention was called to the nature of
the warrant and that his actions were contrary to law, and with righteous
indignation Joseph Smith obtained a writ of habeas corpus and was legally
tried before the municipal court of Nauvoo and discharged. Each of the
members of the city council did the same, and were likewise discharged.
Anger of the Mob
When Bettisworth returned to Carthage without his
prisoners, the disappointment of the mobocrats was intense, and they
threatened to go against Nauvoo in force. Indignation meetings were held
in Warsaw and Carthage, and inflammatory speeches were made against the
Saints. The assembled mobbers in each place adopted resolutions in which
they said, “We hold ourselves at all times in readiness to co-operate with
our fellow-citizens in this state, Missouri and Iowa, to exterminate,
utterly exterminate, the wicked and abominable ‘Mormon’ leaders, the
authors of our troubles.” All members of the Church, or sympathizers with
Joseph Smith, were warned to leave these townships on pain of instant
vengeance. A deputation was sent by them to the governor, stating that
Joseph Smith and others had refused to obey the mandate of the writ, and
with other falsehoods they attempted to prejudice him in their favor. The
minutes of these unlawful and wicked proceedings were published in the
Warsaw Signal and other papers of the state.
The Saints Threatened
The Saints also sent messengers to the governor with
full and correct accounts of the proceedings at Nauvoo, and asking for
protection. In the meantime, without waiting for the governor’s reply, the
mob forces commenced their brutal attacks upon the Saints residing outside
of Nauvoo, threatening them with destruction unless they immediately
accepted one of the following propositions: Deny Joseph Smith as a Prophet
of God and join the mob in securing his arrest; gather up their effects
and move to Nauvoo; or give up their arms and remain quiet until the
affair was over. Runners were dispatched to Missouri for aid from the
mobbers there, and the whole country was inflamed by the spread of
diabolical falsehoods.
Advice of Judge Thomas
The Prophet did everything in his power to allay
excitement and kept the governor posted with numerous affidavits and
documents regarding the state of affairs. Judge Jesse B. Thomas, of the
circuit court, advised the Prophet to go before some justice of the peace
in the county and have an examination on the writ issued by Morrison,
which action would take away all excuse of the mob, and then he could take
steps to have them bound to keep the peace. For his pains, Judge Thomas
was threatened by the mob with a coat of tar and feathers. The Prophet
accepted his advice and was tried before Justice Daniel H. Wells, a
non-“Mormon,” and after a full investigation was discharged. His enemies
knew that this trial was lawful, as the previous one had been; but they
were determined not to be thwarted in their wicked purpose. They thirsted
for the blood of the Prophet and were determined to drag him to Carthage,
with or without process of law, there to slay him. A mass meeting was held
in Nauvoo, pacific resolutions were adopted, and messengers chosen to go
forth in the surrounding country to declare the truth and allay
excitement; but the prejudice was too great and little was accomplished.
Nauvoo Under Martial Law
Because of threats of mob vengeance from both Missouri
and Illinois information was sent to President Tyler of the United States,
acquainting him with the danger and asking for protection. Nauvoo was
placed under martial law, and the legion mustered into service in
self-defense. The Prophet stood before them in his uniform as
lieutenant-general and addressed them at length, in defense of their
liberties. In the course of his remarks he said:
“It is thought by some that our enemies would be
satisfied by my destruction, but I tell you as soon as they have shed my
blood, they will thirst for the blood of every man in whose heart dwells a
single spark of the spirit of the fulness of the Gospel. The opposition of
these men is moved by the spirit of the adversary of all righteousness. It
is not only to destroy me, but every man and woman who dares believe the
doctrines that God hath inspired me to teach to this generation.”
Appeal to the Governor for Protection
On June 16, Joseph wrote Governor Ford, calling his
attention to the mob meetings at Carthage and Warsaw, and the threats made
to exterminate the Saints. He requested the governor to come to Nauvoo to
make further investigation, and to quell insurrection. Instead of going to
Nauvoo, Governor Ford went to Carthage, and sent word to Nauvoo that he
was there in the interest of peace, and asked that well-informed and
discreet persons be sent to him. Elders John Taylor and Dr. John M.
Bernhisel were immediately sent to Carthage; but to their surprise and
disappointment they found the governor surrounded by some of the worst
element in Illinois. The Laws, Fosters and Higbees, with Joseph H.
Jackson, an adventurer and murderer, the publishers of the Expositor, had his ear. Elders Taylor and Bernhisel could
not get an interview with the governor except in the presence of these
vicious enemies who had pledged themselves to bring to pass the death of
Joseph and Hyrum Smith. As they told their side of the story they were
constantly interrupted by this rabble with, “that’s a — —
lie,” and other unseemly epithets of like character. The governor treated
them very rudely, showing that he was under the influence of the mob. He
stated that Joseph Smith and the members of the city council should come
to Carthage to be tried on the original writ as nothing short of that
would satisfy the people. When the messengers protested because of the
murderous spirit of the mob, the governor strenuously advised that they
come without arms and pledged his faith that they should be protected. He
also sent a written communication to Joseph Smith, in which he said the
city council, in destroying the Expositor press,
had committed a gross outrage upon the laws and liberty of the people. He
ignored the trial before the municipal court and also that before Daniel
H. Wells, justice of the peace, demanding that all who were accused should
submit themselves “to be arrested by the same constable, by virtue of the
same warrant, and be tried before the same magistrate whose authority has
heretofore been resisted. Nothing short of this can vindicate the dignity
of violated law and allay the just excitement of the people.” Governor
Ford must have blushed with shame when he penned these lines, for he knew
he was violating his oath of office and declaring an untruth, for the sake
of finding favor with the mob. If his demand was not complied with he
threatened to come with sufficient force to execute his order. “You know
the excitement of the public mind,” he said. “Do not tempt it too far. A
very little matter may do a very great injury; and if you are disposed to
continue the causes of excitement and render a force necessary to coerce
submission, I would say that your city was built, as it were, upon a keg
of powder which a very little spark may explode.”
“And I will,” he continued, “also guarantee the
safety of all such persons as may thus be brought to this place from
Nauvoo either for trial or as witnesses for the accused.”
The same day (June 22) the Prophet respectfully replied
to this cravenly penned communication, defending his course and denying
the false accusations contained in the governor’s letter. He called
attention to the promises made in Missouri, but when witnesses came they
were cast into prison, and since “a burnt child dreads the fire,” they
were not to be blamed if they refused to place themselves in the hands of
a blood-thirsty mob openly making threats to take their lives. The Prophet
expressed a willingness to go before any other justice in the state,
except at Carthage, or before the circuit court, but did not feel legally
bound to go to Carthage to be butchered.
The governor’s letter to Joseph Smith caused no small
surprise among the Saints. It was evident that they could not look to him
for help, for he had joined himself entirely with their enemies. He had
ignored the law; refused to recognize the legality of the courts, and the
right of a fair and impartial trial before an unprejudiced judge and jury.
Hyrum Refuses to Leave his Brother
So serious had the matter become that a letter was sent
to President Brigham Young and the apostles who were in the mission field,
instructing them to return to Nauvoo at once. The Prophet had previously
(June 20) advised his brother Hyrum to take his family and go at once by
steamboat to Cincinnati. Hyrum replied: “Joseph, I can’t leave you,”
whereupon Joseph remarked to his brethren, “I wish I could get Hyrum out
of the way, so that he may live to avenge my blood, and I will stay with
you and see it out.”
The Proposed Journey to the West
In the afternoon of June 22, Joseph was in consultation
with Hyrum Smith, John Taylor, Willard Richards and Dr. John M. Bernhisel,
when it was decided that he should go to Washington and lay the whole
difficulty before President Tyler. At dusk another consultation was held,
when the Prophet called these same brethren and William W. Phelps, Abraham
C. Hodge, John L. Butler, Alpheus Cutler and William Marks, to his office
in his upper room. The governor’s letter was read and the Prophet said,
“There is no mercy—no mercy here.” Hyrum said, “No; just as sure as
we fall into their hands we are dead men.” Joseph replied, “Yes: what
shall we do, Brother Hyrum?” Hyrum replied, “I don’t know.” All at once
the Prophet’s countenance brightened up and he said, “The way is open. It
is clear to my mind what to do. All they want is Hyrum and myself; then
tell everybody to go about their business, and not to collect in groups,
but to scatter about. There is no doubt they will come here and search for
us. Let them search; they will not harm you in person or property, and not
even a hair of your head. We will cross the river tonight, and go away to
the West.” On this date Joseph wrote: “I told Stephen Markham that if
Hyrum and I were ever taken again we should be massacred, or I was not a
prophet of God. I want Hyrum to live to avenge my blood, but he is
determined not to leave me.”
Between nine and ten o’clock Hyrum Smith came out of the
Mansion House and gave his hand to Reynolds Cahoon, saying, “A company of
men are seeking to kill my brother Joseph, and the Lord has warned him to
flee to the Rocky Mountains to save his life. Good-bye, Brother Cahoon, we
shall see you again.” A few minutes later, as Joseph, Hyrum and Willard
Richards were waiting on the river bank, William W. Phelps was instructed
to take the families of the Prophet and Patriarch to Cincinnati. About
midnight the three brethren were rowed across the river by Orrin P.
Rockwell, who returned with instructions to obtain horses and pass them
over the river the next night secretly, and be ready to start for the
Great Basin in the Rocky Mountains.
The Governor’s Threat
At ten o’clock on the morning of the 23rd the governor’s
posse arrived in Nauvoo to arrest the Prophet, but not finding him they
returned, leaving one of their number to watch for him. This posse said
that if Joseph and Hyrum Smith were not given up the governor was
determined to send his troops into the city and guard it until they were
found, if it took three years.
Joseph Smith Accused of Cowardice
At one p.m. Emma Smith sent Orrin P. Rockwell to entreat
the Prophet to come back. Reynolds Cahoon accompanied him with a letter to
the same effect. Reynolds Cahoon, Lorenzo D. Wasson and Hiram Kimball
accused Joseph of cowardice for wishing to leave the people, saying that
their property would be destroyed, and they would be left without house or
home. Like the fable, when the wolves came the shepherd ran from the flock.
The Return to Nauvoo
The persecutions of enemies were easy to bear, but when
he was thus accused by those who should have been his dearest friends, the
Prophet was stung to the quick. It was not for himself he sought safety,
but for his people. If this was all they cared, he would not seek to save
himself. He replied: “If my life is of no value to my friends, it is of
none to myself.” Turning to Rockwell he said, “What shall I do?” Rockwell
answered: “You are the oldest and ought to know best; and as you make your
bed, I will lie with you.” Joseph then turned to Hyrum and said: “Brother
Hyrum, you are the oldest, what shall we do?” Hyrum said, “Let us go back
and give ourselves up, and see the thing out.” The Prophet remained in
deep reflection for some time, and then remarked: “If you go back I will
go with you, but we shall be butchered.” Hyrum said, “No, no; let us go
back and put our trust in God, and we shall not be harmed. The Lord is in
it. If we live or have to die, we will be reconciled to our fate.”
They then returned, and the first thing the Prophet did
was to notify Governor Ford, by the hands of Theodore Turley and Jedediah
M. Grant, that he would be ready to go to Carthage on the morrow. The
governor promised to send a posse to protect him on the way, but through
the influence of the Nauvoo conspirators, he changed his mind and ordered
the Prophet and Patriarch to come to Carthage without escort.
The Start for Carthage
Early on the morning of the 24th of June, Joseph and
Hyrum with the accused members of the city council and a few tried
friends, left Nauvoo for Carthage. On the way the Prophet hesitated, and
looked back with admiration upon the city, the temple, and his farm. “This
is the loveliest place, and the best people under the heavens,” he said;
“little do they know the trials that await them!” They passed the home of
Esq. Daniel H. Wells, who was unwell. The Prophet stopped and called on
him, and as he parted, he said: “Squire Wells, I wish you to cherish my
memory, and not think me the worst man in the world either.”
The Governor’s Demand for Arms
About four miles from Carthage, they met Captain Dunn
with a company of about sixty mounted militia, who presented the Prophet
with an order from the governor for delivery of all the state arms in
possession of the Nauvoo Legion, which Joseph promptly countersigned. It
was not enough for the governor to demand the presence of the Prophet and
Patriarch at Carthage to be murdered, but the people in Nauvoo were to be
left defenseless against their enemies. This order for the delivery of the
state arms was evidently intended to exasperate the Saints to commit some
overt act, which might be construed as treason. Fearing that the
inhabitants of Nauvoo would show resistance, Captain Dunn requested that
the whole company return with him to Nauvoo, and pledged to protect them
even with his life. A messenger was sent to the governor explaining the
reason for the return to Nauvoo. Notwithstanding the many threats, which
the governor constantly had heard against the lives of Joseph and Hyrum
Smith, no action was taken to disarm the mob, who were mustered into the
governor’s service. It appeared very much like a repetition of the
Missouri scenes, in making the Saints defenseless while in a peaceful
attitude, and arming their murderous enemies with state arms.
A Lamb to the Slaughter
When the company met Captain Dunn, the Prophet said:
“I am going like a lamb to the slaughter, but I am as
calm as a summer’s morning. I have a conscience void of offense toward
God and toward all men. If they take my life I shall die an innocent
man, and my blood shall cry from the ground for vengeance, and it shall
be said of me, ‘He was murdered in cold blood!’”
When the work of Captain Dunn was accomplished, he
thanked the people for their peaceful compliance and promised them
protection. Late that afternoon the journey to Carthage was commenced
again. It was midnight when the company arrived at that town, and while
passing the public square many of the troops of the Carthage Greys made
murderous threats. “Stand away, you McDonough boys,” they yelled, “and let
us shoot the damned ‘Mormons’” “—— you, old Joe, we’ve got you
now. Clear the way and let us have a view of Joe Smith, the prophet of
God. He has seen the last of Nauvoo. We’ll use him up now, and kill all
the damned Mormons.”
Governor Ford’s Promise to the Mob-Militia
On hearing these threats Governor Ford put his head out
of a window and said, “I know your great anxiety to see Mr. Smith, which
is natural enough, but it is quite too late tonight for you to have the
opportunity; but I assure you, gentlemen, you shall have that privilege
tomorrow morning, as I will cause him to pass before the troops upon the
square, and I now wish you, with this assurance, quietly and peaceably to
return to your quarters.” With a faint “Hurrah for Tom Ford,” they
complied with his wish.
The Charge of Treason
Early on the morning of the 25th the prisoners
voluntarily surrendered themselves to Constable Bettisworth. Shortly
afterwards Joseph and Hyrum were again arrested by Bettisworth on the
charge of “treason” against the state of Illinois, on complaint of
Augustine Spencer and Henry O. Norton.
The Governor’s Inflammatory Speech
Shortly after eight o’clock Governor Ford called all the
troops together and formed them in a hollow square. He then addressed them
in a most inflammatory manner against the Prophet Joseph and the Patriarch
Hyrum Smith. They needed little encouragement, as he well knew, for they
even then were inflamed to a murderous degree. At the close of his speech
he fulfilled his promise to the troops as they were drawn up in file, by
taking Joseph and Hyrum Smith before them, and introduced them as Generals
Joseph and Hyrum Smith. The Carthage Greys refused to receive them by such
title, and made threats against their lives, to which the governor paid
little heed.
His Lack of Sincerity
When Joseph Smith reported to Governor Ford that he had
been before Daniel H. Wells, a justice of the peace, and had been tried,
the governor replied that no other justice would do to try the case but
the one who had issued the writ, therefore they must be tried before
Justice Morrison. His lack of sincerity is shown in the fact that they
were now taken before Justice Robert F. Smith, captain of the Carthage
Greys and a most bitter mobocrat. The governor’s object was to drag them
to Carthage to their enemies, and there was no thought of justice or right
in making his demand. The accused brethren were bound over to appear at
the next term of the circuit court. It was evident that the magistrate
intended to place their bail at a figure which could not be met, in order
to cast them into jail, but the bond was given, and Justice Smith left the
court house without calling on the two prisoners, Joseph and Hyrum Smith,
to answer to the charge of treason.
False Imprisonment
About eight p.m. Constable Bettisworth appeared at their
lodgings at the Hamilton House and insisted on Joseph and Hyrum going to
jail. They demanded to see the copy of the mittimus, which was refused.
Their counsel, Messrs. H. T. Reid and J. W. Woods, informed the
constable that they were entitled to a hearing before a justice, whereupon
the constable produced a mittimus which falsely stated that they had been
brought before Justice Robert F. Smith and the trial had been postponed by
reason of the absence of material witnesses. They vigorously protested
against such false and outrageous proceedings. Justice Smith asked the
governor for advice, since his mittimus was illegal, and therefore this
was a false committal, when Governor Ford replied, “You have the Carthage
Greys at your command!” The hint was sufficient, and
Captain Robert F. Smith thereupon commanded his “Greys” to execute
the illegal action of Justice Robert F. Smith,
and the Prophet Joseph and Patriarch Hyrum Smith were thrust into jail in
defiance of all law. Elder John Taylor protested to the governor, but was
answered by that craven individual that he had no power to interfere, and
the law must take its course.
The Governor’s Broken Pledge
On the morning of June 26, Joseph requested an interview
with Governor Ford, which had been denied him the day before. This time it
was granted and the whole cause of the trouble was reviewed. Governor Ford
contemplated going to Nauvoo the following day to investigate certain
charges of counterfeiting, and the Prophet said he considered himself
unsafe in Carthage and requested to be taken to Nauvoo. The governor gave
his word of honor that he would take him when he went, but failed to keep
his promise.
The Illegal Summons
In the afternoon, Frank Worrell appeared before the jail
with the Carthage Greys and demanded that the prisoners be delivered up to
the constable to be taken before Justice R. F. Smith for trial. The
jailer, who had been instructed to keep them in custody “until discharged
by due course of law,” protested such proceedings; but by threats Worrell
compelled the jailer to surrender the prisoners. They were taken before
Justice Smith, where their counsel, who had been given no notice of a
trial, asked for a continuance that they might obtain witnesses. A
continuance was granted until noon the following day. A new mittimus was
made out and the prisoners committed again to prison, and without
consultation on their part the time of trial was changed until the
twenty-ninth.
Threats of the Mob
It was common conversation on the camp ground and at the
hotel, in the presence of Governor Ford, that “The law is too short for
these men, but they must not be suffered to go at large;” and “if the law
will not reach them, powder and ball must.” Previously the governor had
said, in order to quiet the impatience of the Carthage Greys, that they
should have “full satisfaction.”
The Night in Jail
The evening of the 26th of June was spent by the
prisoners and a number of friends, viz., John Taylor, Willard Richards,
John S. Fullmer, Stephen Markham and Dan Jones, in conversing on the
scriptures, Hyrum Smith occupying most of the time. They all retired to
bed late, except Dr. Willard Richards who sat up writing until his last
candle burned out. The Prophet and Patriarch occupied the bed, while the
other brethren slept on a mattress on the floor. The report of a gun
caused Joseph to arise from the bed, and going over to the mattress, he
lay down on the floor between Dan Jones and John S. Fullmer. Stretching
out his right arm he said to John S. Fullmer, “Lay your head on my arm for
a pillow, Brother John.” He then conversed with Brother Fullmer on many
topics and gave expression to the presentiment he had from the beginning
that he was to die. “I would like to see my family again,” he said, and “I
would to God that I could preach to the Saints in Nauvoo once more.” After
air was quiet he turned to Dan Jones and whispered, “Are you afraid to
die?” Dan said, “Has that time come, think you? Engaged in such a cause I
do not think that death would have many terrors.” The Prophet replied,
“You will yet see Wales and fulfil the mission appointed you before you
die.”
The Plotting by the Mob
Early on the morning of the 27th, John P. Greene and
William W. Phelps called at the jail, and the Prophet sent Dan Jones out
to inquire what the firing of a gun in the night near the jail was for.
Frank Worrell, of the Carthage Greys, and officer of the guard, replied,
“We have had too much trouble to bring Old Joe here to let him ever escape
alive, and unless you want to die with him you had better leave before
sundown; and you are not a damned bit better than him for taking his part.
And you’ll see that I can prophesy better than Old Joe, for neither he nor
his brother, nor anyone who will remain with them will see the sun set
today.” Dan Jones reported to the Prophet who directed him to go to the
governor and tell him what had taken place. On his way he overheard an
officer making a speech, in which he said, “Our troops will be discharged
this morning in obedience to orders, and for a sham we will leave the
town; but when the governor and the McDonough troops have left for Nauvoo
this afternoon, we will return and kill these men, if we have to tear the
jail down.” This was greeted by three cheers from the troops.
The Governor Warned
Jones immediately reported to the governor what he had
heard. Governor Ford replied: “You are unnecessarily alarmed for the
safety of your friends, sir, the people are not that cruel.” Irritated by
this remark, Jones urged the necessity of placing better men to guard the
jail, and he said: “The Messrs. Smith are American citizens, and have
surrendered themselves to your Excellency upon your pledging your honor
for their safety; they are also Master Masons, and as such I demand of you
protection of their lives.”
Governor Ford’s face turned pale, and Jones continued:
“If you do not do this, I have but one more desire, and that is, if you
leave their lives in the hands of those men to be sacrificed—”
“What is that, sir?” Ford asked in a hurried tone.
“It is,” said Jones, “that the Almighty will preserve my
life to a proper time and place, that I may testify that you have been
timely warned of their danger.”
Jones then returned to the prison, but the guards drove
him away. Going to the hotel he witnessed the discharge of the troops, as
the officer had predicted, and shortly afterwards Governor Ford with the
McDonough militia, the most friendly to the Saints, departed for Nauvoo,
leaving the Carthage Greys, the most blood-thirsty of the troops, to guard
the jail. The plot was working admirably without a hitch in the
proceedings.
“A Poor Wayfaring Man of Grief”
John S. Fullmer and Stephen Markham, who had gone forth
on errands, were also refused admittance again to the jail, while John
Taylor and Willard Richards remained with their leaders. The day passed
on, the prisoners and their two friends spent the time in bearing
testimony to the truth of the Gospel, the divinity of the Book of Mormon,
and in writing to their friends. Almon W. Babbitt called at the jail in
the forenoon with a letter from Oliver Cowdery. Shortly after three
o’clock there was excitement among the guards.
At this hour Elder John Taylor sang the hymn “A Poor
Wayfaring Man of Grief.” When he had finished, the Prophet asked him to
sing it through once more, which he did. At four o’clock the guard was
changed. At five o’clock the jailer, Mr. Stigall, suggested that the
prisoners retire to the cell below, where they would be safer.
The Martyrdom
Shortly after five o’clock there was a rustling at the
outer door of the jail and a cry of surrender, and the discharge of three
or four firearms. Dr. Richards glanced out of the window and saw about one
hundred armed men around the door. Many of them had their faces blackened.
It is said the guard elevated their guns and boisterously threatened the
mob, but took good care to fire over their heads. The mob encircled the
building and some of them rushed past the guard up the flight of stairs,
burst open the door and began their work of death, while others fired
through the windows. Joseph, Hyrum and Elder Taylor had their coats off.
The Prophet sprang for his coat to get a six barreled pistol which Cyrus
Wheelock had given him, and Hyrum reached for a single barrel pistol that
had been left by John S. Fullmer. They all then braced themselves against
the door, Elder Taylor armed with a heavy walking stick of Elder Markham’s
and Dr. Richards with Elder Taylor’s cane. In an instant a ball whistled
up the stairway, and Joseph Smith, John Taylor and Willard Richards sprang
to the left of the door, and tried to knock aside the guns of the
ruffians. Hyrum Smith retreated back and in front of the door, snapping
his pistol, when a ball struck him on the left side of the nose. He fell
on his back saying: “I am a dead man!” As he fell on the floor another
ball from the outside entered his left side, and passed through his body
with such force that it completely broke to pieces the watch he wore in
his vest pocket. At the same instant another ball grazed his breast,
entered his throat, and passed into his head, while another was fired into
his leg. A shower of bullets was pouring into the room. Joseph reached
around the door casing and discharged his six shooter into the passage,
some barrels missing fire, while Elders Taylor and Richards continued to
parry the muskets which were sticking through the door. When Hyrum fell,
the Prophet said: “Oh, dear brother Hyrum!” Seeing there was no safety in
the room, and without doubt thinking to spare his other companions, he
turned calmly from the door, dropped his pistol on the floor, and sprang
into the window. Two balls pierced him from the door, and one entered his
right breast from without. He fell outward into the hands of his
murderers, exclaiming: “O Lord, my God!” With a cry that he had jumped
from the window, the assassins who were in the building rushed down the
stairs. Elder Taylor was also severely wounded; four balls piercing his
body, one ball struck his watch as he attempted to jump from the window,
throwing him back into the room.
When the ruffians left the building, Elder Richards who
had miraculously escaped, except that a ball grazed his ear, started for
the door. Elder Taylor called to him; he returned and carried the wounded
man upstairs into the “dungeon” and stretched him on the floor. Covering
him with a bed, he said: “This is a hard case to lay you on the floor, but
if your wounds are not fatal, I want you to live to tell the story.” He
then returned to the room below, expecting the next moment to be shot.
Terror of the Mob
After accomplishing their deed of blood, terror seized
the hearts of the assassins who fled from the scene of their diabolical
crime in utmost confusion. Governor Ford, three miles out of Nauvoo, on
his way to Carthage, met George D. Grant and Constable Bettisworth
hastening to Nauvoo with the news of the martyrdom. With terror on his
countenance, he carried them back to Carthage, that they might not spread
the awful tale, until he should be at a distance beyond the vengeance
which he feared. Arriving at Carthage, he advised the citizens to flee for
their lives before the infuriated “Mormons” came to burn their town, and
suiting action to his words he fled with his posse towards Quincy.
Conscience-stricken and with the blood of prophets on his hands, he did
not stop until he arrived at Augusta, eighteen miles away.
Sorrow of the Saints
In the meantime word of the horrible tragedy was sent by
Dr. Willard Richards to Nauvoo. He said he had pledged his word to the
frightened citizens of Carthage, that no violence or vengeance would be
attempted by the Saints, and for the Saints to keep the peace and be
prepared for an attack from Missouri. Indeed, there was no thought of
summary vengeance by the Saints. With heads bowed down and hearts filled
with grief—for the greatest sorrow in all their history had come
upon them—they silently wept and prayed, leaving vengeance to Him
who said, “Vengeance is mine; I will repay!”
The Burial
The next day, June 28, 1844, the bodies of the martyred
prophets were taken to Nauvoo by Dr. Willard Richards, Samuel H. Smith and
a guard of eight soldiers sent by General Deming. On the 29th, they were
interred amidst the deep mourning of a stricken people.
Chapter 36
Preparation to Leave Nauvoo
A Crisis in the Church
The martyrdom of Joseph and Hyrum Smith came as a
terrible shock to the members of the Church. The thought that the Prophet
was to be taken from them had not entered their minds, notwithstanding the
many predictions he had made regarding his approaching death. He was only
in his thirty-ninth year. His constitution was strong and he was possessed
of exceptional vitality. The Lord had saved him so many times from perils
and threatened death, that the Saints fully expected the same power to
shield him always.
His death brought about a crisis in the Church, for it
was the first disorganization of the presiding quorum of the Priesthood.
Very little thought had been given to the subject of succession in the
Presidency, even by the leading brethren, for such a contingency seemed to
them to be very remote. The revelations were clear on that point, but
there had been no occasion for consideration of the subject. In the
revelation on Priesthood, given to the apostles in 1835 (Doc. and Cov.
Sec. 107), the Lord said that the council of the apostles was equal in
authority with the First Presidency, and Joseph Smith stated that its
place was second only to the presidency of the Church, and where there was
no First Presidency, the apostles would preside. When the Saints were left
without the guiding hand of the Prophet, they were in confusion, not fully
understanding this order of the Priesthood. Sidney Rigdon, first counselor
to President Joseph Smith, had lost the spirit of the work. Contrary to
the direct command of the Lord in a revelation (Doc. and Cov. Sec. 124:108
–9) he moved his residence to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, where he was
of little assistance as a counselor in the presidency. For many months
before his death, Joseph Smith had suspected Sidney Rigdon of being in
league with his enemies. The Prophet openly accused Sidney of being guilty
of such treacherous action, from which accusation he was not entirely
cleared. He had manifested much sympathy for John C. Bennett, the
arch-traitor, although he denied any direct communication with him. At the
October conference, 1843, the Prophet refused to sustain Sidney Rigdon as
a counselor, but through the merciful pleadings of Hyrum Smith and others,
he was sustained. On that occasion the Prophet said: “I have thrown him
off my shoulders, and you have put him on me; you may carry him, but I
will not.” Amasa M. Lyman had been chosen to act as a counselor in his
stead. William Law, Joseph’s second counselor, had been excommunicated for
apostasy, and was one of those who brought to pass the martyrdom.
Sidney Rigdon’s Attempt to be “Guardian to the Church”
Most of the apostles were in the Eastern States on
missions at the time of the martyrdom. Only two were at Nauvoo, and one of
them seriously wounded. As soon as Sidney Rigdon heard of the death of
Joseph and Hyrum Smith, he hastened to Nauvoo, where he arrived Saturday,
August 3, 1844. Elders Parley P. Pratt and George A. Smith had arrived a
few days before. The apostles invited Sidney Rigdon to meet with them the
following morning, at eight o’clock at the home of John Taylor, where they
might discuss the affairs of the Church, which Sidney Rigdon promised to
do. Instead of doing so he met with William Marks and a few others, and
endeavored to lay plans for the appointment of a trustee-in-trust and a
“guardian” for the Church, before others of the apostles could arrive. At
ten o’clock a public meeting was held and Sidney Rigdon preached declaring
that a “guardian” must be appointed, “to build up the Church unto Joseph,”
and stating that he, Sidney, was the identical man spoken of by the
ancient prophets to do the work they had spoken of in prophecy. Another
meeting was held in the afternoon, at which Elder William Marks, president
of the Nauvoo Stake, announced that there would be a special meeting of
the Church on Thursday, August 8th, “for the purpose of choosing a
guardian.” Sidney Rigdon had requested that the meeting be held on the
6th, but William Marks announced it for the 8th, which was providential,
for President Brigham Young and most of the other apostles arrived in
Nauvoo on the evening of the 6th. The next morning the apostles held a
council meeting at the home of Elder Taylor. At four o’clock the apostles
met with the high council of Nauvoo and the high priests. Sidney Rigdon
was invited to express his views. He spoke at some length, relating a
vision he claimed to have had, and stating that there could be no
successor to Joseph Smith, but that the Church must be built up to him.
He, Sidney, had been called to be a spokesman to Joseph Smith, and he
proposed to be a guardian to the Church, if the people would receive him.
President Young’s Remarks
President Brigham Young said he did not care who
presided over the Church, but one thing he would have to know and that was
what the Lord said about it. “Joseph conferred upon our heads,” he said,
“all the keys and powers belonging to the apostleship which he himself
held before he was taken away, and no man or set of men can get between
Joseph and the twelve in this world or in the world to come. How often has
Joseph said to the twelve: ‘I have laid the foundation and you must build
thereon, for upon your shoulders the kingdom rests.’”
The Special Meeting of Thursday, the 8th of August
Thursday, August 8, 1844, the special meeting called by
William Marks in behalf of Sidney Rigdon was held at 10 o’clock. Sidney
Rigdon, from a position in a wagon in front of the stand in the grove,
addressed the vast assembly for about one hour and a half. He presented
himself to them as a “guardian” for the Church, that it might be built up
unto Joseph Smith. The longer he talked, the more the people were
convinced that he was without the inspiration of the Lord, and they left
the meeting feeling that his was not the voice of the true shepherd.
Transfiguration of Brigham Young
At the close of the morning meeting, President Brigham
Young, made a few remarks and announced that there would be another
meeting at 2 o’clock. At the appointed time a great multitude of Saints
assembled. The various quorums of the Priesthood were arranged in order
before the stand, and after the opening exercises President Brigham Young
addressed the congregation. He spoke with great power and the people were
convinced that the authority and power of presidency was with the
apostles. When he first arose to speak the people were greatly astonished,
for President Young stood transfigured before them and they beheld the
Prophet Joseph Smith and heard his voice as naturally as ever they did
when he was living. It was a manifestation to the Saints that they might
recognize the correct authority. Following his remarks in the afternoon,
Amasa M. Lyman, William W. Phelps and Parley P. Pratt each spoke endorsing
the remarks of President Young.
The Apostles are Sustained
After the other brethren had spoken President Young
arose and was about to put the question to the assembly whether or not
they wanted Sidney Rigdon for a leader and to be a “guardian” for the
Church, but at the request of Elder Rigdon the question of supporting the
apostles as the presiding quorum of the Church was presented first by
President Young as follows:
“I will ask you as quorums: Do you want Brother Rigdon
to stand forward as your leader, your guide, your spokesman? President
Rigdon wants me to bring up the other question first, and that is: Does
the Church want, and is it their only desire to sustain the twelve as
the First Presidency of this people?“Here are the apostles, the Bible, the Book of Mormon,
the Doctrine and Covenants—they are written on the tablet of my
heart. If the Church want the twelve to stand as the head, the First
Presidency of the Church, and at the head of this kingdom in all the
world, stand next to Joseph, walk up into their calling, and hold the
keys of this kingdom, every man, every woman, every quorum is now put in
order, and you are now the sole controllers of it.“All that are in favor of this, in all the
congregation of the Saints manifest it by holding up the right hand.”
There was a universal vote, after which President Young
called for the negative as follows:
“If there are any of the contrary mind, every man and
every woman who does not want the twelve to preside, lift up your hands
in like manner.”
There were no hands raised, and President Young then
remarked that since the vote was unanimous it superseded the other
question of presenting Sidney Rigdon as “guardian” and also trying the
vote by quorums. In this manner the apostles, who were the rightful
authorities according to the revelations of the Lord, were sustained by
the vote of the people and by common consent, as the Lord had commanded
that all things should be done. The matter of succession was properly and
rightfully decided, and was now binding on the members of the Church. At
the close of the services the Saints returned to their homes, their minds
at rest, for they were, with very few exceptions, no longer in doubt
regarding the authority of the Priesthood and the presidency of the Church.
Excommunication of Sidney Rigdon
Manifesting a bitter spirit and great disappointment,
Sidney Rigdon returned to Pittsburgh. However, before he left Nauvoo he
gave expression to his feelings declaring that the Church had not been led
by the Spirit of the Lord for a long time, and he refused to sustain the
apostles in their calling. A charge was made against him and his case was
presented before the high council, with Bishop Newel K. Whitney presiding.
After a lengthy hearing he was cut off the Church by the unanimous vote of
the council. His case was then presented to the congregation of the
Saints, and they sustained the action of the high council, only ten
persons voting in the negative. After his return to Pittsburgh, he
organized a church with officers after the order of the Church of Jesus
Christ. He published a paper and prophesied that all who followed the
apostles would go with them to destruction. He gathered around him a few
of the disaffected spirits from Nauvoo, but his organization did not
prosper and soon came to an end.
Action Against William Marks
At the October conference, 1844, the apostles were again
sustained as the presiding quorum of the Church by a united vote of the
members. When the name of William Marks, president of the Nauvoo Stake,
was presented, objection was raised and he was rejected, only two persons
voting to sustain him. He had favored the claim of Sidney Rigdon, although
he supported the apostles, but his spirit was no longer in the work and he
was found in rebellion. He later left the Church and followed James J.
Strang1 and others, and was excommunicated.
Trial of the Murderers of Joseph and Hyrum Smith
In October, 1844, a grand jury selected by the Hancock
County circuit court, brought into court two bills of indictment against
nine individuals for the murder of Joseph and Hyrum Smith. The trial took
place in May, 1845, but proved to be nothing but a farce. The sentiment
throughout the country was so bitter against the Saints that no attempt
was made to obtain justice, which the governor had faithfully promised
them. The jurors were instructed by the court to bring in a verdict of
“not guilty,” which was accordingly done. Yet every man in the place,
including the court and jury, knew that the defendants were among those
who committed the murder. The blood of the martyrs was left unavenged to
cry from the ground against their enemies, and with the blood of all the
martyrs, shall continue to cry until the Son of Man shall come “red in his
apparel” to take vengeance upon the ungodly.
Growth of the Work
After the question of the presiding quorum was decided,
the Saints settled down to their usual duties, and the progress of the
Church continued with greater strides than ever before. At the October
conference in 1844, a great deal of important business was transacted. At
that time and subsequently many brethren were ordained to the ministry, a
number of quorums of seventy were organized, and missionaries were called
to go to various parts of the United States and abroad with the message of
salvation. The building of the temple was continued with renewed
diligence, and prosperity was manifest in the settlements of the Saints.
On the 6th of December 1844, the last of the thirty capitals on the temple
was erected, and the following April, the capstone was laid amidst solemn
and enthusiastic services. Each room was dedicated separately as it was
finished, and ordinance work for the Saints, as well as baptisms for the
dead, were performed.
Mob Activities Renewed
The enemies of the Latter-day Saints thought that the
murder of Joseph and Hyrum Smith would be the end of “Mormonism.” They
rejoiced in the accomplishment of their frightful deed of blood, and
boasted of the downfall of the Church. To their great surprise the blood
of the martyrs was the seed of the Church. The object they hoped to gain
was not attained; therefore their anger was rekindled against the Church.
Other leaders had arisen and the progress of the work was steady and
onward. Those who had caused the death of the Prophet and the Patriarch
now turned their attention to the destruction of the entire “Mormon”
people. Through their papers, the Warsaw Signal,
Alton Telegraph, Quincy Whig
and others, they circulated all manner of false reports. They
accused the Saints of theft and every other abominable crime in order to
stir up the populace against them. Schemes were launched to provoke the
“Mormons” to commit some overt act, that it might be seized upon as a
pretext to gain the aid of the officials of the state under color of law;
yet by the anti-“Mormons” the laws were constantly broken without
restraint. Their malicious and murderous threats passed unnoticed so far
as any check upon such actions was concerned.
Attitude of Governor Ford
During all the trouble Governor Thomas Ford went out of
his way to inform the Saints that they were bitterly hated, and that the
great majority of the citizens of the state rejoiced in the death of
Joseph and Hyrum Smith. Notwithstanding his bitterness, he made an
investigation of the charges circulated against the Saints and reported
that—
“On my late visit to Hancock County I was informed by
some of their (the ‘Mormons’) violent enemies, that their larcenies had
become unusually numerous and insufferable. They indeed admitted that
but little had been done in this way in their immediate vicinity. But
they insisted that sixteen horses had been stolen by the Mormons in one
night, near Lima, in the County of Adams. At the close of the
expedition, I called at this same town of Lima, and upon inquiry, was
told that no horses had been stolen in that neighborhood, but that
sixteen horses had been stolen in one night in Hancock County. This last
informant being told of the Hancock County story, again changed the
venue to another distant settlement in the northern edge of Adams
County.”
In his message to the legislature he said in reference
to this subject:
“Justice, however, requires me to say, that I have
investigated the charge of promiscuous stealing, and find it to be
greatly exaggerated. I could not ascertain that there were a greater
proportion of thieves in that community, than in any other of the same
number of inhabitants; and perhaps if the city of Nauvoo were compared
with St. Louis, or any other western city, the proportion would not be
so great.”
The leaven of opposition, however, was at work, and the
citizens were aroused. Nothing but the departure of the “Mormon” people
from the state would satisfy their unjust and iniquitous demands. They
appealed to the governor to aid them in expelling the people who had done
nothing to provoke opposition, but who were unpopular because of their
faith. While the governor informed them he could take no legal action
warranting such expulsion, yet he privately advised the Saints to depart
peaceably towards the West, as the Prophet Joseph Smith had contemplated
doing, and there, said he, they could set up an independent government of
their own. So lacking was he in the disposition to enforce the law and
protect the innocent, that the enemies of the Church were encouraged in
their unlawful course.
Repeal of the Nauvoo Charter
The city charter of Nauvoo had proved a protection to
the Saints, and guaranteed safety against the plottings of the wicked. It
was the aim of the Nauvoo conspirators to cause its repeal. The first
attempt to do this, as we have learned, failed. Now, however, the
opposition had become so strong that the enemies of the Latter-day Saints
accomplished their purpose. The charter was repealed by the legislature in
January, 1845. Some of the murderers of Joseph and Hyrum Smith sat in that
body and violently denounced the “Mormons,” although it was well known
that their hands were stained with innocent blood. After the repeal of the
charter, and without hope of protection from the officers of the state,
the Saints were at the mercy of their enemies. The prediction of the
Prophet Joseph that after they had shed his blood they would seek the
lives of every soul in whom was found the testimony of the Gospel, was
literally fulfilled. The plots of the wicked were now turned against
President Brigham Young and the leading brethren, who were forced to go
into hiding from time to time.
Attacks Upon the Saints
In September, 1845, the scattered families of Saints
were sorely persecuted. Many were driven from their homes, which were
burned. Sheriff J. B. Backenstos endeavored to perform his duty, and
took a determined stand against mob law. For his pains he was arrested on
the charge of murder, as a mobber had been killed, but violence against
the “Mormons” was permitted to go unchecked. Governor Ford had promised
and pledged his word, that the murderers of the Prophet and Patriarch
should be brought to justice. When he appealed to the citizens of Warsaw
to sustain him in this pledge, they positively informed him that they
would do nothing of the kind. Similar answers were given by other
citizens, who not only took a stand in opposition to the trial of the
murderers, but brazenly appealed to the governor to give his aid in
expelling the “Mormons” from the state. That weak and pusillanimous
individual, by his subsequent actions, acknowledged his defeat and the
abdication of government in Illinois.
The Quincy Mass Meeting
September 22, 1845, a mass meeting was held in Quincy to
take action against the Saints. Their removal from Illinois was advocated.
Those who assembled fully understood that the Prophet Joseph Smith had
contemplated a removal to the West, and that plans were on foot early in
1844 to send an exploring expedition out to locate a site for a new home
in the Rocky Mountains. A committee was appointed by this mass meeting to
wait upon the authorities of the Church and ascertain their intentions
regarding a removal from the state of Illinois, and to impress upon the
brethren that such a move was determined upon by the citizens. Following
the meeting the Quincy Whig made this statement
in this boasted land of liberty:
“It is a settled thing that the public sentiment of
the State is against the ‘Mormons,’ and it will be in vain for them to
contend against it; and to prevent bloodshed, and the sacrifice of many
lives on both sides, it is their duty to obey the public will and leave
the State as speedily as possible. That they will do this we have a
confident hope and that too, before the next extreme is resorted to
—that of force.”
The Reply of the Saints
The committee appointed waited upon President Brigham
Young and the apostles, and acquainted them with the action of the mass
meeting and desired a reply. On the 24th, the reply was given in a written
communication. The persecutions of the Saints were mentioned and the
statement made that the “Mormons” had endeavored to live in peace and
desired to do so with all men. In relation to their removal they answered
as follows:
“We would say to the committee above mentioned and to
the Governor, and all the authorities, and people of Illinois, and the
surrounding states and territories, that we propose to leave this
country next spring, for some point so remote that there will not need
to be any difficulty with the people and ourselves, provided certain
propositions necessary for the accomplishment of our removal shall be
observed, as follows, to wit:“That the citizens of this and surrounding counties,
and all men, will use their influence and exertion to help us to sell or
rent our properties, so as to get means enough that we can help the
widow, the fatherless and the destitute to remove with us.“That all men will let us alone with their vexatious
lawsuits so that we may have time, for we have broken no law; and help
us to cash, dry goods, groceries, good oxen, beef-cattle, sheep, wagons,
mules, horses, harness, etc. in exchange for our property, at a fair
price, and deeds given at payment, that we may have means to accomplish
a removal without the suffering of the destitute to an extent beyond the
endurance of human nature.“That all exchanges of property shall be conducted by
a committee, or by committees of both parties; so that all the business
may be transacted honorably and speedily.“That we will use all lawful means, in connection with
others, to preserve the public peace while we tarry; and shall expect,
decidedly, that we be no more molested with house-burning, or any other
depredations, to waste our property and time, and hinder our business.“That it is a mistaken idea, that we have proposed to
remove in six months, for that would be so early in the spring that
grass might not grow nor water run; both of which would be necessary for
our removal. But we propose to use our influence to have no more seed
time and harvest among our people in this country after gathering our
present crops; and that all communications to us be made in writing.“By order of the Council,”
“Brigham Young,”
“President.”“W. Richards.”
“Clerk.”
Decision of the Quincy Citizens
The Quincy citizens accepted the proposition of the
Church authorities to move, but very graciously declined to make any
promise to buy or to assist in the purchase of the abandoned property of
the Saints. Why should they put themselves out to do such a thing, when
the property would naturally fall into their hands when it was abandoned?
2
The Carthage Convention
On the 1st and 2nd of October another convention of
citizens from nine counties adjacent to Hancock, was held at Carthage.
Resolutions were adopted in which the “Mormons” were accused of
depredations upon the persons and property of the other citizens of
Hancock County, and adjudged guilty, in spite of the personal
investigation of the governor, himself unfriendly to the Latter-day
Saints. Much bitterness of spirit was manifested at this meeting, which
decided that it was too late to settle any difficulties between the
“Mormons” and the other inhabitants, and only one thing would suffice and
that was the removal of the “Mormons” from the state. They declared that
the “Mormons” were not being persecuted, but were suffering for their
dishonest acts; at the same time they declared that from “long
acquaintance with the old citizens of Hancock County,” they could vouch
for their “honor, integrity, and strict observance of the laws of their
country,” notwithstanding it was universally known that these same
citizens had taken part in the assassination of Joseph and Hyrum Smith by
mob force and contrary to law; moreover, that these same law-abiding
citizens within the past few weeks had driven “Mormons” from their homes
and burned their houses to the ground; had forced them from their fields
where they had gone to gather crops; had whipped their men and stolen
their cattle without any protest. It appeared that the old citizens, like
the king, could do no wrong, if their depredations were committed against
the Latter-day Saints. A most regrettable feature in connection with these
troubles is the fact that O. H. Browning, Stephen A. Douglas and
others, who had defended the Prophet Joseph Smith, now gave their
influence to the mob and assisted in bringing to pass the expulsion of the
“Mormon” people from Illinois. Bitter feelings against the Saints
increased. Judges were intimidated, and even the officials of the state
dared not raise a voice in protest above a whisper, or invoke the majesty
of the law.
Duplicity of Governor Ford
The anti-“Mormons” of Illinois became impatient for the
removal of their enemies before spring arrived. Their agreements were
violated, and the Saints were not permitted to dwell in peace. Vexatious
lawsuits, based on falsehoods, were planted against the apostles to
embarrass them and hinder the progress of their work. Even Governor Ford,
fearing that the Saints would not leave the state within the stipulated
time, resorted to duplicity to force them from the borders of Illinois.
December 29, 1845, he wrote to Sheriff Backenstos stating that indictments
in the United States Court had been found against the leading “Mormons”
which would bring them for the first time in collision with the United
States. “If the ‘Mormons’ remain in the state,” he wrote, “a strong force
will be ordered to Nauvoo by the Secretary of War,” and he thought the
government at Washington would interfere and prevent the “Mormons” from
going west of the Rocky Mountains, as many intelligent persons believed
that they would there join the British, and “be more trouble than ever.”
He thought that this consideration was likely to influence the government.
He later sent word by Sheriff Backenstos that he had turned against the
Saints and Major Warren was making calculations to prevent their going
away. In his History of Illinois, Governor Ford
admitted that he had resorted to deceit to make the “Mormons” believe that
they would be prevented from going west, in order to hasten their
departure.
President Young’s Reply
Commenting on the governor’s letter to the sheriff,
President Young remarked:
“Should Governor Ford’s speculations and suppositions
in relation to U. S. troops prove correct, and the government send
a regular force to arrest us, we will run no risks of being murdered by
them as our leaders have been; and as to fearing a trial before the
courts, it is all gammon, for our danger consists only in being held
still by the authorities while mobs massacre us, as Governor Ford held
Joseph and Hyrum Smith, while they were butchered.”
Loyalty to the Government
Answering the charge that when they got away from the
borders of the United States, the Latter-day Saints would join the forces
of some other nation which might be at war with the American Government
—a thought which rightfully might have been entertained after the
treatment the “Mormon” people had received within the borders of that land
—the high council and authorities of the Church replied:
“We also further declare for the satisfaction of some
who have concluded that our grievances have alienated us from our
country, that our patriotism has not been overcome by fire, by sword, by
daylight nor by midnight assassinations which we have endured; neither
have they alienated us from the institutions of our country.“Should hostilities arise between the Government of
the United States and any other power, in relation to the right of
possessing the territory of Oregon, we are on hand to sustain the claim
of the United States Government to that country. It is geographically
ours, and of right; no foreign power should hold dominion there; and if
our services are required to prevent it, these services will be
cheerfully rendered according to our ability. We feel the injuries that
we have sustained, and are not insensible of the wrongs we have
suffered; still we are American.”
Preparations to Leave Nauvoo
During the fall and winter months preparations went
steadily on for the removal of the entire body of the Latter-day Saints in
the spring. Work on the temple continued with increased diligence, as if
there was no thought of a removal, until that structure was completed.
January 1, 1846, the work of finishing the assembly room for dedication
was nearing completion. The general conference of the Church was held in
the building in October, 1845, according to the commandment of the Lord
through Joseph Smith in October, 1841. In December, the ordinance work in
the temple was commenced, and thereafter the building was occupied both
day and night to afford the Saints the opportunity to receive their
endowments. This continued until most all of the Saints had departed on
their westward journey. May 1, 1846, after the majority of the people had
departed from the city, the temple was publicly dedicated in the presence
of about three hundred persons.
In the meantime every available building in Nauvoo had
been converted into a shop where wagons, harness and other necessary
articles could be manufactured for the journey. The timber for the wagons
was cut and brought to Nauvoo, where it was prepared and boiled in salt
and water or kiln dried. Teams were sent to various parts of the country
to procure iron; and blacksmiths, wheelwrights, carpenters and other
workmen were kept busy night and day. There was very little sale of
property because of the opposition of the citizens of the country, who
used their influence to discourage sales by making threats against the new
settlers as well as harassing the Saints.
Notes
James J. Strang, a man of some ability and commanding presence,
joined the Church shortly before the martyrdom. After the death of the
Prophet and Patriarch he claimed to have been chosen and appointed by
Joseph Smith as his successor. He exhibited a letter which purported to
have been written by the Prophet, in which such appointment was claimed to
be set forth. He gathered quite a following of the discontented element at
Nauvoo and established himself on Beaver Island, in Lake Michigan, where
later he was crowned “king.” He was shot and killed by one of his
followers, and his organization soon afterwards crumbled to pieces. Out of
its fragments some years later there arose another organization known as
the “Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints,” unto which
there were gathered the majority of those who had become disaffected and
had been excommunicated from the Church.
2. Dr. Conyers, in his Hancock
County Mob, makes the following comment on the action of the Quincy
citizens:
“The first one [resolution]
in our opinion, is unique. They accepted and recommended to the people of
the surrounding counties to accept an unconditional proposition to remove.
But understand, Mr. Mormon, though we accept it and recommend the
surrounding counties to do so likewise, [reprobate you, unconditionally]
we do not intend to bring ourselves under any obligation to purchase your
property, or to furnish purchasers; but we will be very kind and obliging,
and will in no way hinder or obstruct you in your efforts to sell,
provided, nevertheless this shall not be so construed as to prevent us
from running off the purchaser. But we expect this small favor of you,
viz., that you must dispose of your property and leave at the appointed
time.”
Part Five
The Settlement in the Rocky Mountains
Chapter 37
The Abandonment of Nauvoo
Wednesday, February 4, 1846, the first of the Saints
left Nauvoo and crossed the Mississippi River on the journey to the West.
1
On the 6th of February Bishop George Miller and a company with
six wagons crossed the river, and a few days later the work of ferrying
the Saints to the Iowa side was kept up day and night. Elder Parley P.
Pratt left Nauvoo on the 14th of February, and the following day President
Brigham Young, Willard Richards and George A. Smith with a large company
of Saints crossed the Mississippi on the ice and continued their journey
about nine miles to Sugar Creek, in Lee County, where a temporary camp was
formed for the exiles fleeing from Nauvoo.2 President Young spent
the 16th in organizing the camp into companies and Elder Heber C. Kimball
with another company arrived on the 17th. On the 18th President Young and
some of the brethren returned to Nauvoo to transact some necessary
business and give instruction to those who were left there in command.
Elder Joseph Young, president of the seventies, had been left at Nauvoo to
preside over the Saints who still remained. The exiles tarried on Sugar
Creek for some time where a number of council meetings were held and the
needs of the people were duly considered.
At the October conference in 1845, the members of the
Church, on suggestion of President Brigham Young, unanimously covenanted
as follows: “That we take all the Saints with us, to the extent of our
ability, that is, our influence and property.” After the motion was
carried, President Young remarked: “If you will be faithful to your
covenant, I will prophesy that the Great God will shower down means upon
this people to accomplish it to the very letter.” The members of the
Church had been constantly instructed to prepare for the journey by laying
up stores of provisions for many months. It was discovered that many who
had come to Sugar Creek were without supplies to last them more than a few
days, and this caused serious reflection and some anxiety among the
leading brethren. It was winter time and supplies could not readily be
obtained in the wilderness. However, those who had, shared with those who
were destitute, and the Lord blessed them in their substance.
Conspiracy in Washington
While camped on Sugar Creek a letter was received by
President Young from Samuel Brannan, in which there was presented a
proposition from Amos Kendell, formerly Postmaster-General, A. G.
Benson and others, to use the Church authorities as their tools to secure
land in California. They represented to Brannan that there was a movement
on foot to disarm the Saints and prevent their movement towards the West.
However, they declared, the power was in their hands to avert the
calamity, which they would do on certain terms. Their terms were that when
the Saints arrived in California they would secure the lands and that
every alternate section should be deeded to this combination of
conspirators. They falsely represented that the President, James K. Polk,
was a party to the scheme. For their service these men promised that the
Saints should be permitted to travel to their destination without
molestation, and with the protection of the government. With righteous
indignation President Young and the Apostles refused to make reply.
Petition to the Governor of Iowa
On the 28th of February a petition was addressed to the
governor of Iowa, imploring his protection and influence in behalf of the
Saints while they passed through that territory, or remained temporarily
within its borders, to raise crops and to render assistance to those who
would follow after. No reply to this petition was received and the Saints
continued without aid or interference.
The Journey Resumed
March 1, 1846, camp was broken and the journey was
resumed. The weather was extremely cold and stormy, and a great number of
the people were without proper clothing and necessary shelter. Many of the
wagons were without covers, and others had covers which would not shed the
rain. Several members of the camps died from exposure and lack of proper
care. The roads were almost impassable because of the constant storms.3
At this time there were some four hundred wagons on the road,
heavily laden and without sufficient teams to permit of rapid travel. In
this condition the exiles continued their toilsome journey over the plains
of Iowa. By the latter part of April the great body of the Latter-day
Saints had left Nauvoo and were slowly wending their way seeking a haven
in the west.
Organization of the Camps
While encamped near the Chariton River on the east fork
of Shoal Creek, the organization of the camps was reduced to a more
systematic order. They were divided into companies of hundreds, fifties
and tens, with officers appointed to preside over each. The apostles were
appointed to take charge of divisions, and the camps were divided into two
grand divisions. Over one of these President Brigham Young had command. He
was also sustained as “president over all the camps of Israel.” Elder
Heber C. Kimball was appointed to the command of the other grand division.
In addition to these officers there were appointed a contracting
commissary and a distributing commissary for each fifty. The duties of the
former were to agree on terms, prices, etc., concerning the purchase of
provisions and necessities for the camp. The latter were to distribute
among the camps the grain and provisions furnished for that purpose,
judiciously and with singleness of heart. This organization led to better
discipline. The companies were more susceptible to advice and counsel, and
the principle of obedience was more fully understood. Less selfishness was
manifested among the people, and a better spirit prevailed. Of necessity
the regulations in the camps were strict, yet the freedom and rightful
privileges of the Saints were safely guaranteed. Much of the dross had
been left behind, and the “fair weather friends,” as they were called by
Col. Thomas L. Kane, had forsaken the tents of Israel and had sought the
tents of ease. In this manner the camps were purged of those who were not
faithful enough to face the perils and deprivations of the eventful
journey. Although there were difficulties and differences to be settled
from time to time, President Young was led to declare that he doubted if
there had ever been a body of people, since the days of Enoch, who had
done so little grumbling under such unpleasant and trying circumstances.
Garden Grove
At the beginning of the journey about one hundred men,
under command of Colonel Stephen Markham, were selected as pioneers, to
travel in advance of the companies to build and repair the roads; also to
seek out temporary places for shelter where fields could be cultivated and
homes—humble though they, of necessity, would have to be—might
be provided for the exiles. The advance companies arrived at a place on
the east fork of Grand River, some one hundred and forty-five miles west
of Nauvoo, April 24, 1846. Here a temporary settlement was selected which
they named Garden Grove. Two days later a council meeting was held and
three hundred and fifty-nine laboring men were reported in the camp. From
these one hundred were selected to cut trees and make rails; ten to build
fences; forty-eight to build houses; twelve to dig wells and ten to build
bridges. The remainder were employed in clearing land and preparing it for
cultivation. Every one was busy, and in a few days a respectable village,
magic like, had risen in the wilderness. A temporary organization was
effected with Samuel Bent as president, and Aaron Johnson and David
Fullmer as counselors. At this point President Young addressed the Saints
saying it would be necessary to leave some of their number here, because
they could not continue the journey, while the main body would push on and
“lengthen the cords and build a few more stakes,” and so continue on until
they could all gather at the place appointed, and “build the house of the
Lord in the tops of the mountains.”
Proposition to Explore the West
It was the intention of President Young and the apostles
to fit out a strong company of able-bodied men, unencumbered with
families, and send them to the Rocky Mountains, there to build houses and
plant crops, and prepare for the coming of the people as they were able to
gather from year to year. “Were matters to be so conducted,” he said,
“none would be found crying for bread or destitute of clothing, but all
would be provided for, as designed by the Almighty. But instead of taking
this course the Saints have crowded on us all the while, and have
completely tied our hands by importuning and saying, ‘Do not leave us
behind. Wherever you go, we want to go, and be with you;’ and thus our
hands and feet have been bound, which has caused our delay to the present
time. And now hundreds at Nauvoo are continually praying and importuning
with the Lord that they may overtake us, and be with us.” An estimate of
what would be required for a company of pioneers to take such a journey
was made and the project was considered, but subsequent events prevented
the undertaking until the following year.
Mount Pisgah
On the 18th of May President Young and several of the
apostles reached the middle fork of Grand River, some twenty-seven miles
west of Garden Grove. Here Parley P. Pratt with a company was found
encamped. He had called the place Mount Pisgah, and here it was decided to
make another settlement for the Saints. Several thousand acres of land
were fenced for cultivation, after the manner of the settlement at Garden
Grove, and this place became a resting place for the weary exiles for
several years while crossing the plains. Elder William Huntington was
chosen to preside with Elders Ezra T. Benson and Charles C. Rich as
counselors. The camps were now traveling through an Indian country, where
there were no roads, no settlements and only Indian trails. The spring
rains having ceased, however, greater progress was made although a road
had to be prepared all the way, and bridges built over all the streams.
At the Missouri River
On the 14th of June, President Young, Heber C. Kimball,
Parley P. Pratt and others arrived on the banks of the Missouri, not far
from Council Bluffs, with their respective companies. The next day a
council meeting was held and it was decided to move back on to the bluffs
where spring water could be obtained, and they would be protected from
Indians. The Pottawattamie Indians were very friendly, and their chiefs
showed the Saints some favor. A ferry boat was built and on the 29th the
companies commenced crossing the river. About this time Elder Wilford
Woodruff, who had just returned from presiding over the British Mission,
and Elder Orson Hyde, who had been laboring in Nauvoo, joined the camp.
President Young was still very anxious to send an
exploring company to the Rocky Mountains in advance. The camps were called
together, there being about five hundred wagons on the ground and others
on the way, and President Young addressed them advising them of his desire
to get a company off for the Rocky Mountains. He feared, he said, that
something would happen to stop the movement, and was impressed that
“everything that men and hell could invent would be hatched up to prevent
the camp from making any progress.” He spoke plainly on the subject and
said if the members of the Church should be blown to the four winds, and
never gathered again, he wished them to remember that he had told them
when and where to gather, and if they failed to do so to remember and bear
him witness in the day of judgment, that they had received such
information and advice.
A Call From the Government
June 26, 1846, Captain James Allen, of the United States
army, arrived at Mount Pisgah and had an interview with the brethren
there. He was the bearer of a message to the “Mormon” people making a
requisition on the camps for four or five companies of men, to serve as
volunteers in the war with Mexico, which had recently been declared. The
brethren at Mount Pisgah did not feel authorized to take any action, and
therefore advised Captain Allen to visit President Young and the apostles
at Council Bluffs. Captain Allen arrived at Council Bluffs on the 30th day
of June, and the following day met with the Church authorities and
presented his credentials for raising five hundred men. Such a demand
caused some surprise and a little dismay among the camps. However,
President Brigham Young declared that the volunteers would be forthcoming.
It was moved by Heber C. Kimball and seconded by Willard Richards, that a
battalion of five hundred men be raised, which was carried unanimously at
a meeting of the brethren of the camp who were called together to consider
the requisition. Consequently President Young and Elder Kimball returned
to Mount Pisgah to raise volunteers, while letters were sent to Garden
Grove and to Nauvoo bearing on the subject. Monday, July 13, 1846, in
obedience to the call of the authorities, the camps of the Saints met on
Mosquito Creek, where they were addressed by President Young, Captain
Allen and Colonel Thomas L. Kane, who had arrived in the camp to be of
service to the people. Four companies of the battalion were raised on that
and the following day, and the fifth company a few days later.
An Important Council Meeting
July 16, a council meeting was held at the bluffs and
Ezra T. Benson was ordained an apostle in the stead of John E. Page, who
had been excommunicated. Elders Orson Hyde, Parley P. Pratt and John
Taylor were appointed to go to England to take charge of the affairs of
the Church in that land and set them in order. Reuben Hedlock and Thomas
Ward, who had been in charge, had been guilty of misconduct in the use of
funds and had been disfellowshipped. The same day four companies of the
battalion were mustered into service by their respective captains, and on
the 20th left for Fort Leavenworth in the service of the United States.
The fifth company left the following day, and the entire body arrived at
their destination August 1, 1846, numbering at the time five hundred and
forty-nine men.
President Young’s Instructions to the Battalion
In giving instructions to the members of the battalion
before their departure, President Young requested that they prove
themselves to be the best soldiers in the service of the United States. He
instructed the captains to be fathers to their companies, and to manage
the officers and men by the power of the Priesthood. They should keep neat
and clean; teach chastity, gentility, and civility. No swearing should be
indulged in; no man was to be insulted, and they should avoid contentions
with Missourians, or any other class of people. They were to take their
Bibles and Books of Mormon with them, but were not to impose their belief
on others. They were advised to avoid card playing and if they had any
cards with them to burn them. If they would follow the instructions given
they would not be called on to shed the blood of their fellow men, and
after their labors were over, they probably would be discharged within
eight hundred miles of the proposed settlement of the Saints in the Great
Basin, where the next temple would be built in a stronghold free from mobs.
Reasons for the Call for Troops
January 20, 1846, while the high council of Nauvoo was
considering the abandonment of that place and journeying to the Rocky
Mountains, the subject of sending an advance company was discussed. There
had been some talk of the government building block houses and forts along
the road to Oregon, and the matter was then before Congress. It was
decided at this meeting that “In the event of the President’s
recommendation to build block houses and stockade forts on the route to
Oregon becoming a law, we have encouragement of having that work to do,
and under our peculiar circumstances, we can do it with less expense to
the government than any other people.” Six days later Elder Jesse C.
Little was appointed to preside in the Eastern States, and was furnished a
letter of appointment in which the following occurs:
“If our government shall offer any facilities for
emigrating to the western coast, embrace those facilities, if possible.
As a wise and faithful man, take every honorable advantage of the times
you can. Be thou a savior and a deliverer of that people, and let
virtue, integrity and truth be your motto—salvation and glory the
prize for which you contend.”
Acting on this advice Elder Little wrote an appeal to
President Polk in behalf of the Latter-day Saints, and afterwards called
upon him and also the vice-President and members of the cabinet. At the
time of his interview, June 1, 1846, word of the commencement of
hostilities between Mexico and the United States had reached Washington,
and those governments were in a state of war. The authorities in
Washington accepted the suggestion of Elder Little, thinking it might be
opportune to call upon the “Mormons” for volunteers. This was a very
different action than that hoped for by the authorities of the Church, as
they were looking for the opportunity to labor along the road toward
Oregon over which they were destined to travel. Nevertheless they had
asked for aid and now they were determined to carry through the
proposition of the government, hoping thereby that a blessing would be
obtained and some benefit accrue to them. In complying with the order from
the government over five hundred of their most vigorous young men were
taken from their camps to travel westward by another route thus greatly
weakening the camps.
Winter Quarters
The call of these able-bodied men for the battalion made
it impossible for the Saints in their weakened condition, to continue
their journey towards the West. It became necessary, therefore, for them
to seek quarters where they could prepare for the coming winter. Captain
James Allen secured from the chiefs representing the Pottawattamie tribes
their voluntary consent for the Saints to make the Indian lands an abiding
place as long as they should remain in that country. He also wrote an open
letter stating what he had done in this matter. The Indian sub-agent also
endorsed the letter which Colonel Thomas L. Kane forwarded with a
communication of his own, to the President of the United States. Measures
were taken to gather to this place all the scattered Saints who were on
the plains. Twelve men were chosen to form a high council, and a site was
chosen on the west bank of the Missouri River for their settlement. A
committee of twelve men was appointed to arrange the temporary city into
wards, over which bishops were chosen to preside. During the summer hay
was cut in sufficient quantities to provide for their stock in the winter.
Every family labored diligently to construct some kind of a house in which
they could find shelter, although many of these were merely dugouts built
in the side of the hill. The place was named Winter Quarters and was laid
out regularly into streets. The Indians gave some trouble and it became
necessary to build a stockade around the town. Through kind treatment,
President Young and the Saints obtained the good will of most of the
Indians, so that they lived in comparative peace.
Major Harvey’s Opposition
Major H. M. Harvey, the superintendent of Indian
affairs and some others, made trouble for the Saints. Mr. Harvey called on
President Young in November, and stated that he wished the Saints to move
from the lands belonging to the Indians, and complained that the people
were burning the Indians’ wood. He said he had instructions from the
government to permit no settlers on the lands without authority from
Washington. President Young explained that the reason for the encampment
was due to the sudden demand of the United States for troops, and if the
government prevented them from continuing their journey, some
consideration and protection in return should be offered. Later
developments indicated that the opposition was instigated by the enemies
of the Saints. Through the intercession of J. K. Kane, father of
Colonel Thomas L. Kane, the government gave permission for the exiles to
remain where they were through the winter. Colonel Kane proved himself a
faithful friend to the Latter-day Saints, and was yet to perform valiant
service. He wrote to Elder Willard Richards, the camp historian, stating
that he was intending to secure a lease from the government of the Omaha
lands, on which some of the Saints had located. “Trust me,” he said, “it
is not fated that my forces shall depart before I have righted you at the
seat of government, and have at least assured to you a beginning of
justice besides an end of wrong.”
Activities at Winter Quarters
A gristmill was built at Winter Quarters; also a council
house, where meetings could be held. This was done as much for the sake of
keeping the people employed as it was for their convenience. During the
winter they suffered greatly. The scurvy broke out among them and
continued until potatoes were obtained from Missouri, and horse-radish was
discovered in an abandoned fort near the camp. Meetings were regularly
held and the spiritual as well as the temporal welfare of the refugees was
not neglected. Much of the time of the leading brethren was spent in
giving employment to the Saints and in devising means for the continuance
of the journey when the time should come in the spring for them to move.
Mob Uprisings at Nauvoo
In the summer of 1846, hostilities were renewed against
the members of the Church who still remained in Nauvoo. The great body of
the Saints had left and only a remnant remained, composed of the poor,
sick and afflicted, who had been unable to get away. They were all anxious
to depart and were exerting all their energies to obtain means for that
purpose. President Young and the apostles also were doing all in their
power to aid them to depart. Notwithstanding their straitened
circumstances and their inability to move—which was due mainly to
mob violence they had suffered—their enemies became impatient at
their delay and continued their vicious persecution. The new citizens, who
had purchased property from the Saints, also came in for a share of the
bitterness of the mob.
Major Warren’s Proclamation
Major W. B. Warren, who had been stationed in
Hancock County with a small force, took up his quarters at Nauvoo by order
of the governor and published a proclamation to the citizens of Hancock
County attempting to quiet their opposition, in which, in part, he said:
“I have been in Nauvoo with my detachment a week, and
can say to you with perfect assurance, that the demonstrations made by
the ‘Mormon’ population, are unequivocal. They are leaving the state,
and preparing to leave, with every means that God and nature has placed
in their hands. Five ferry boats are running at this place night and
day, and many are crossing at Nashville and Fort Madison. This ought to
be satisfactory.“The anti-‘Mormons’ desire the removal of the
‘Mormons;’ this is being effected peaceably, and with all possible
dispatch. All aggressive movements, therefore, against them at this
time, must be actuated by a wanton desire to shed blood, or to plunder.
This course, I know, is deprecated by three-fourths of the anti-‘Mormon’
population, and must not be indulged in. I therefore exhort all good
citizens to stay at home, with an assurance that they shall be duly
advised of all movements which may take place, in which they feel
interested.“A man near sixty years of age, living about seven
miles from this place, was taken from his house a few nights since,
stripped of his clothing, and his back cut to pieces with a whip, for no
other reason than because he was a ‘Mormon,’ and too old to make
successful resistance. Conduct of this kind would disgrace a horde of
savages.”
A proclamation of this kind, issued by one who was
himself none too friendly to the “Mormon” people, was without effect. At
the time he wrote, John McAuley and Levi Williams—the latter a
Baptist preacher, and one of the mob who took part in the murder of Joseph
and Hyrum Smith—with a strong force were preparing to gather under
arms, contrary to the proclamation of the governor to the effect that not
more than four persons with arms should assemble together, other than the
state troops. Though his force was small, Major Warren notified these
mobbers that he had law and moral force on his side and was able to meet
successfully any mob which could assemble in that county. He advised the
“Mormons” to go on with their preparations to cross the river, as speedily
as they could, and leave the fighting to him; if he should be overpowered,
then they could recross the river and defend themselves and property.
Kidnapping of Phineas H. Young and Others
On the 11th day of July, eight of the citizens of Nauvoo
went into the country about eleven miles from Nauvoo, to harvest wheat.
While engaged in their work they were surrounded by a mob who ransacked
their wagons, seized their weapons, and then took them one at a time and
brutally beat them with hickory goads. Several of the mobbers engaged in
this were recognized, and two, John McAuley and a man named Brattle, were
arrested. While they were under arrest, a second party of five “Mormons,”
Phineas H. Young, Brigham H. Young, Richard Ballantyne, James Standing and
James Herring, were waylaid and taken prisoners. When they asked why they
were treated in that manner the answer was given that they had committed
no offense, but they were “Mormons,” and were to be held as hostages for
the safety of McAuley and Brattle. They were held by their persecutors for
fourteen days, several times facing guns expecting to be shot, from which
they were saved only by interposition of Divine power. Attempts were made
to poison them, and they were most inhumanely treated. Finally they made
their escape and returned to Nauvoo.
The “Resistance of Law”
When the two mobbers were arrested a gun was found in
the possession of McAuley belonging to one of the harvesters. It was
recognized and seized by William Pickett, a non-“Mormon.” For this action
Pickett and two others were arrested by the mobbers on a “warrant” for
“stealing.” Pickett had incurred the hatred of the mob, and knowing that
the charge against him was only a trick to get him into their hands, he
was not inclined to yield. When John Carlin came from Carthage to arrest
him, Pickett asked if he would be guaranteed safety. Carlin answered no;
whereupon Pickett resisted arrest. Though later he went before the
magistrate at Green Plains, who issued the warrant, and was released.
The “resistance” by Pickett was the thing most desired
by the mob, who only wanted a pretext to attack Nauvoo. Now there had been
a defiance of law. “Nauvoo was in rebellion,” and Carlin issued a
proclamation calling upon the citizens to come as a
posse comitatus, and assist him in executing the law. The citizens of
Nauvoo petitioned the governor for protection, for the mob forces were
collecting under command of James W. Singleton, assisted by J. B.
Chittenden, N. Montgomery, James King, J. H. Sherman and Thomas S.
Brockman. The governor very graciously sent Major Parker with a force of
ten men, and authorized him to take command of such forces as he could
raise from volunteers, and defend the city against mob attacks. There were
very few members of the Church in Nauvoo at the time, less than one
hundred and fifty men who were available for defense.
Counter Proclamations
Parker issued a proclamation calling upon the mobs in
the name of the state and by virtue of his authority, to disperse. Carlin
and his crowd answered by a counter proclamation, stating that they would
consider the government forces as a mob. Parker wrote to Singleton
desiring a compromise without shedding blood. Articles of agreement
requiring all the Saints to leave Nauvoo within sixty days, were drawn up
and signed by Singleton and Chittenden for the mob, and Major Parker and
three others for the government forces. In this manner Parker treated the
mobbers as his equals and agreed to their terms.
Threats Against the Saints
It appears that the object for which the mob forces were
ostensibly raised was entirely forgotten, and no more was heard of the
resistance of the officers by Pickett, but the attacking forces now
determined that all the “Mormons” should go. Singleton in his
communication to Parker said: “When I say to you, the ‘Mormons’ must go, I
speak the mind of the camp and the country. They can leave without force
or injury to themselves or their property, but I say to you sir, with all
candor, they shall go—they may fix the time within sixty days, or I
will fix it for them.”
Attack Upon Nauvoo
These terms did not satisfy the mob. Sixty days was too
long a time for them to wait for the departure of the remnant of the
“Mormons” that they might plunder and rob, and besides they thirsted for
blood. Singleton and Chittenden withdrew from the command of the mob
forces, and wrote to Parker saying that the mob had rejected their treaty,
which they considered reasonable enough. Carlin, the constable, thereupon
placed Thomas S. Brockman in command, and gave orders for the mob to
march. Parker also withdrew from service and Major Benjamin Clifford, Jr.,
took command of the government forces at Nauvoo by a commission from
Governor Ford. September 10, Brockman and his mob approached Nauvoo. Many
of the new citizens, seeing the danger they were in, fled from the city,
leaving but a small force of volunteers to aid Major Clifford in the
defense of Nauvoo. The defenders converted some steamboat shafts into
cannon and threw up some fortifications on the north side of Mulholland
street facing the mob. This small force made a determined stand, although
outnumbered two or three to one. On the 10th, 11th and 12th, there was
desultory firing on both sides. On Saturday the 12th Brockman sent a
communication “to the commander of the ‘Mormon’ forces in Nauvoo,”
demanding a surrender and the delivery of arms, to be returned as soon as
the “Mormons” had crossed the river and were out of the state. The same
day Major Clifford replied stating that there was no “commander of
‘Mormon’ forces” in that place; that he was there “by order of the
governor and commander-in-chief of the Illinois militia to disperse your
(Brockman’s) forces in the name of the people of Illinois.” The reply
continued: “So far I have acted on the defensive, and for the sake of
humanity; if for no other purpose, I hope you will at once see the
propriety and justice of dispersing your forces. The armed force under
your command is not necessary for any lawful purpose in this city or
county.”
The Battle of Nauvoo
Upon receiving this reply, Brockman advanced upon
Nauvoo, endeavoring to gain entrance at the head of Mulholland street, the
main street of the city. He was driven back after a determined resistance
by the defenders of the place. The cowardly mob forces were somewhat
disconcerted at the sound of cannon in Nauvoo, for they thought the
besieged citizens were poorly armed, and that to enter the city would be
an easy thing to do. During the battle three of the defenders lost their
lives, namely, Captain William Anderson, his son, August L., a lad fifteen
years of age, and David Norris. Several others were wounded. It cannot be
ascertained how many were killed on the side of the mob, but a large
number were wounded. The fighting continued until the 16th, and the mob
was repulsed four times. On the latter day a treaty of surrender was
entered into, through the agency of a committee of citizens from Quincy,
who were in sympathy with the mob. This treaty which was signed by Andrew
Johnson for the Quincy Committee, Thomas Brockman and John Carlin for the
mob, and A. W. Babbitt, J. L. Heywood and J. S. Fullmer for
the Latter-day Saints, stipulated that the city of Nauvoo should surrender
September 17, at three o’clock p.m. The arms of the besieged were to be
delivered up to the “Quincy Committee,” to be returned at the crossing of
the river. The citizens and property were to be protected from all
violence. The sick and helpless were to be protected and treated with
humanity, and the “Mormon” population was to leave the state as soon as
they could cross the river. There were provisions of minor importance, one
of which was that five men—including the trustees of the Church
—were to be permitted to remain in the city to dispose of property,
free from all molestation and violence. However, William Pickett, the man
so much wanted according to the first reports of the mob for resisting the
law, and on whose account the mob had gathered, was not to be one of this
committee, nor was he to remain in the city.
Valiant Defenders
Among those who took valiant part in the battles during
the siege of Nauvoo were the two Andersons, father and son, and David
Norris, who lost their lives. They belonged to a company known as the
“Spartan Band,” because of the perilous situation in which they were
stationed in the defense of the city. Also “Squire” Daniel H. Wells,
Captain Andrew L. Lamereaux, William L. Cutler, Alexander McRae, Almon
Fullmer, Benjamin Whitehead, John E. Campbell and Curtis E. Bolton. In
fact the entire band of noble defenders are worthy of special mention, and
their names should be recorded among the true sons of liberty.4
The Violation of the Treaty
According to the agreement, the mob forces entered
Nauvoo on the 17th, and in keeping with the usual mob spirit, failed to
regard their agreement. Immediately they commenced to drive the Saints
from the city, and treated some of the men in a most brutal manner. They
commenced their diabolical deeds by searching the wagons on the bank of
the river waiting to be ferried across, and ransacked their contents
taking all firearms and scattering the goods over the ground. Families of
the poor were ordered from the city at the point of the bayonet. The sick
were sorely abused, and even those who were engaged in the burying of
their dead were molested. They entered the temple, ascended the tower and
rung the bell, shouting and yelling, and giving vent to filthy oaths in a
fiendish manner. They plundered the homes of the people, irrespective of
whether they were members of the Church or not. Colonel C. M. Johnson
was sentenced to death, but his persecutors could not agree on the manner
of his execution and he escaped. With such inhuman treatment, the members
of the Church remaining in Nauvoo, were forced across the Mississippi
River in their poverty and distress. Their condition was pitiable, but it
could not move the hearts of the mobs of Illinois. These outcasts camped
on the bank of the river for several days, where the Lord in his mercy fed
them, as he did the children of Israel, with a supply of quails, until
help arrived from the camps of Israel in the wilderness. As soon as they
could leave they bid farewell to the inhospitable boundaries of
“civilization” and took up their journey toward the west, there to build a
city of refuge, and find a haven of rest among the more tender-hearted
savages of the desert.
Notes
The same day two hundred and thirty-five members of the Church, from
branches in the New England and the Atlantic States, under the direction
of Samuel Brannan, sailed from New York for California. They had chartered
the ship “Brooklyn” at twelve hundred dollars per month, the lessee to pay
the port charges. They carried with them farming implements of all kinds,
blacksmith, carpenter and wheelwright tools and fixtures, the necessary
parts for two gristmills and sawmill irons. They also carried text books
on various subjects and many other volumes. The press and type on which
the Prophet—a paper published by the Church
in New York—was printed, and sufficient paper and other things as
would be needed to establish a new colony in their distant home. They
arrived at Yerba Buena, now San Francisco, Wednesday, July 29, 1846,
having gone around Cape Horn and touched at the Hawaiian Islands. On their
arrival they found the American flag waving over the fort the guns of
which had saluted them on their entrance into the bay. Three weeks earlier
the United States Flag had been raised and the country occupied in the
name of the government. In January, 1847, Samuel Brannan commenced
publishing a newspaper at Yerba Buena called the
California Star, the first English paper published in California.
2. On the first night of the encampment of Sugar
Creek nine infants were born. The weather was inclement and extremely cold
and the people without proper shelter. Writing of these conditions, Eliza
R. Snow, the poetess, has said: “As we journeyed onward, mothers gave
birth to offspring under almost every variety of circumstances imaginable,
except those to which they had been accustomed; some in tents, others in
wagons—in rainstorms and in snowstorms. I heard of one birth which
occurred under the rude shelter of a hut, the sides of which were formed
of blankets fastened to poles stuck in the ground, with a bark roof
through which the rain was dripping. Kind sisters stood holding dishes to
catch the water as it fell, thus protecting the newcomer and its mother
from a showerbath as the little innocent first entered on the stage of
human life; and through faith in the Great Ruler of events, no harm
resulted to either.
“Let it be remembered that the mothers of these
wilderness-born babies were not savages, accustomed to roam the forest and
brave the storm and tempest—those who had never known the comforts
and delicacies of civilization and refinement. They were not those who, in
the wilds of nature, nursed their offspring amid reeds and rushes, or in
the recesses of rocky caverns; most of them were born and educated in the
Eastern States—had there embraced the Gospel as taught by Jesus and
his apostles, and, for the sake of their religion, had gathered with the
Saints, and under trying circumstances had assisted, by their faith,
patience and energies, in making Nauvoo what its name indicates, “the
beautiful.” They had lovely homes, decorated with flowers and enriched
with choice fruit trees, just beginning to yield plentifully.
“To these homes, without lease or sale, they had just
bade a final adieu, and with what little of their substance could be
packed into one, two, and in some instances three wagons, had started out,
desertward, for—where? To this question the only response at that
time was, God knows” (Women of Mormondom,
Tullidge, ch. 32).
It was not the intention of the Saints to leave Nauvoo until the
springtime had fully arrived. But the human fiends, who hated the religion
of the Saints and coveted their substance and property, were not willing
for them to wait. What cared they for the suffering and exposure of an
innocent people, driven from their homes and sheltered by the broad canopy
of heaven in the midst of winter? “We could have remained sheltered in our
homes,” said President Brigham Young, “had it not been for the threats and
hostile demonstrations of our enemies, who, notwithstanding their solemn
agreements, had thrown every obstacle in our way, not respecting either
life, or liberty, or property; so much so that our only means of avoiding
a rupture was by starting in mid-winter. Our homes, gardens, orchards,
farms, streets, bridges, mills, public halls, magnificent temple, and
other public improvements we leave as a monument of our patriotism,
industry, economy, uprightness of purpose, and integrity of heart; and as
a living testimony of the falsehood and wickedness of those who charge us
with disloyalty to the Constitution of our country, idleness and
dishonesty” (Manuscript History of the Church).
4. Daniel H. Wells, who had joined the Church August
9, 1846, after the departure of most of the members of the Church, but who
had always been a true friend to the Prophet Joseph and Patriarch Hyrum
Smith, addressed the remaining members of the Church, while they were in
the hands of their enemies, as follows:
“There is no use in the
small handful of volunteers trying to defend the city against such an
overwhelming force. What interest have the Saints to expect from its
defense? Our interests are not identified with it but in getting away from
it. Who could urge the propriety of exposing life to defend a place for
the purpose of vacating it? I have been in the councils of Joseph and
Hyrum and the twelve, and I know they were desirous that the Saints should
leave the state and go westward. Have not the twelve and most of the
Church gone, and is not their counsel for us to follow? Have not they told
us that our safety was not in Nauvoo, but in our removal westward?
“The trustees have no means
with which to carry on the defense; they are already involved. Major
Parker, who was sent by the governor to aid us, when he left, promised to
raise men and return immediately to our assistance, but he has forsaken
us, and is it not well known that the Quincy Committee was prepared to
join the mob, if a treaty was not effected? Under these circumstances, I
have thrown in my influence with the trustees for the surrender of Nauvoo
upon the best terms we could get, and as being the best and only wise
policy left for us to pursue.
“Brethren, reflect, we have
nothing to gain in defending Nauvoo, but everything to lose; not only
property, but life also, is hourly in peril.”
Chapter 38
Captain Allen’s Circular
When Captain James Allen arrived in the Camps of the
Saints, he issued a “Circular to the ‘Mormons,’” which read as follows:
“I have come among you, instructed by Colonel S.
W. Kearny, of the U. S. Army, now commanding the Army of the West,
to visit the ‘Mormon’ Camp, and accept the services for twelve months of
four or five companies of ‘Mormon’ men who may be willing to serve their
country for that period in our present war with Mexico; this force to
unite with the Army of the West at Santa Fe, and be marched thence to
California, where they will be discharged.“They will receive pay and rations, and other
allowances, such as other volunteers or regular soldiers receive, from
the day they shall be mustered into the service, and will be entitled to
all comforts and benefits of regular soldiers of the Army, and when
discharged, as contemplated, at California, they will be given gratis
their arms and accoutrements, with which they will be fully equipped at
Fort Leavenworth. Thus is offered to the ‘Mormon’ people now—this
year—an opportunity of sending a portion of their young and
intelligent men to the ultimate destination of their whole people, and
entirely at the expense of the United States, and this advance party can
thus pave the way and look out the land for their brethren to come after
them.“The pay of a private volunteer is seven dollars per
month, and the allowance for clothing is the cost price of clothing of a
regular soldier.“Those of the ‘Mormons’ who are desirous of serving
their country on the conditions here enumerated, are requested to meet
me without delay at their principal camp at the Council Bluffs, whither
I am now going to consult with their principal men, and to receive and
organize the force contemplated to be raised.“I will receive all healthy, able men of from eighteen
to forty-five years of age.“J. Allen, Captain 1st Dragoons.”
“Camp of the ‘Mormons,’ at Mount Pisgah, one hundred
and thirty miles east of Council Bluffs, June 26th, 1846.”
Scarcity of Able-Bodied Men
When this call came a great part of the young men of the
ages required were scattered over the plains. Many had gone to St. Louis
and other points for employment to obtain means to help them carry their
families to the west. All of the Saints were poor, and some in dire want.
Those who were able to travel were under the necessity of helping along
the weak, the aged and infirm, who could not be left behind. Among the
teamsters were found mere children, who had been forced into such service
because of the limited number of men.
The Equipment of the Battalion
At Fort Leavenworth the battalion was equipped.1
They received one tent for every six privates and were provided with
flint-lock muskets, a few cap-lock yauger rifles for sharp-shooting and
hunting, and other camp accoutrements. July 5, they drew their check for
clothing, forty-two dollars each, paid one year in advance. A goodly
portion of this money was sent back for the support of their families and
the gathering of the poor from Nauvoo. They also contributed to help
Elders Orson Hyde, Parley P. Pratt and John Taylor on their way to Great
Britain and Elder Jesse C. Little to return to his field in the Eastern
States. The paymaster was much surprised to see every man of the battalion
able to sign his name to the roll, whereas only about one out of every
three of the Missouri volunteers, who previously had received their pay,
could put his signature to the document.
Death of Colonel Allen
Captain James Allen, the recruiting officer for the
battalion, was selected by General Stephen W. Kearny, to take command of
the “Mormon” troops, with the rank of lieutenant-colonel of volunteers. At
Fort Leavenworth Colonel Allen was taken ill, and on the 12th of August,
ordered the battalion to take up its march while he remained for a few
days to recuperate, but on the 23rd, he died. He was much lamented by the
battalion members, for they had learned to love him for his kindness.
Lieutenant Smith in Command
After the death of Colonel Allen, the command devolved
upon Captain Jefferson Hunt, of Company “A.” The promise had been made to
President Young, by Colonel Allen, that no officers would be chosen for
the battalion, except himself, outside of their ranks. On what authority
the promise was made, does not appear. However, shortly afterwards
Lieutenant A. J. Smith, of the regular army, was given command,
contrary to the wishes of the men. With Lieutenant Smith there came Dr.
George B. Sanderson, whom Colonel Allen had appointed to serve with the
battalion as surgeon. According to the journals of the men, they were
caused to suffer considerably because of the “arrogance, inefficiency and
petty oppressions” of these two officers. Sanderson was from Missouri, and
perhaps was none too friendly towards the troops; however, the enforcement
of discipline, to which they were not accustomed, may have magnified the
ill-treatment in their eyes to some extent. The heat of the summer was
excessive, their rations were reduced, and through the drinking of
brackish water, many were taken with malaria. They had already become
weakened from their long marches across the plains of Iowa, in inclement
weather, without proper food and shelter, so that they were more
susceptible to disease. Dr. Sanderson prescribed calomel and arsenic,
refusing to permit the men to resort to their own simple remedies, and
evincing skepticism in the laying on of hands and their exercise of faith.
The Line of March
Their line of march from Fort Leavenworth had taken them
across the Kansas River and then westward to the Arkansas, which they
followed upstream for about one hundred miles. From that point they
journeyed southwest to the Cimarron River and passed near what is now the
junction of the states of Kansas, Colorado and Oklahoma, on a
southwesterly course to the old Spanish town of Santa Fe. From Santa Fe
their route was by way of the Rio Grande, southward near the present city
of El Paso, and thence to the west, through the city of Tucson—which
was deserted by its garrison as the battalion approached—across the
Gila and Colorado to San Diego.
The Families Ordered to Pueblo
As the battalion was leaving the Arkansas River, the
commanding officer gave orders that a number of families which had
accompanied the troops to that point, should be detached and sent to
Pueblo, a Mexican town situated at the eastern base of the Rocky
Mountains. There was some protest because it was contrary to a promise
given at the beginning of the march; but it was really a necessary action.
For the families of members of the battalion to travel with the companies
was a hindrance to the rapid progress they were called upon to make.
Captain Nelson Higgins and a guard of ten men were detailed to make the
journey to Pueblo. They departed September 16, 1846, and on the way one of
their number, Norman Sharp, was accidentally killed.
Colonel Cooke Takes Command
Leaving the Arkansas the battalion resumed its journey
to Santa Fe. On the 2nd of October they crossed Red River where they were
divided into two divisions the following day. The strongest and most
able-bodied men pushed on with all speed and arrived at Santa Fe on the
9th of that month. Here they were received with a salute of one hundred
guns by Colonel Alexander Doniphan, the post commander. On October 12, the
second division arrived, and immediately afterward Captain Phillip St.
George Cooke, an officer of dragoons, succeeded to the command with the
rank of lieutenant-colonel, by appointment of General Kearny. The
appointment of Col. Cooke was another disappointment to the men, who still
hoped for the appointment of Captain Hunt; but they learned to respect and
honor this rugged officer who was a thorough soldier and just and
honorable. Lieutenant A. J. Smith remained with the battalion as
acting commissary, and Dr. Sanderson continued to administer his calomel
and arsenic to the men.
The Sick Sent to Pueblo
At Santa Fe a council of officers was held with Colonels
Doniphan and Cooke, and it was decided to send all the sick together with
the remaining women and children in the camp, to Pueblo for the winter,
with the privilege of journeying towards the main body of pioneers in the
spring, at government expense. Colonel Cooke detailed Captain James Brown
and Lieutenant Elam Luddington to take charge of this company on the march
to Pueblo. October 18, 1846, Captain Brown left Santa Fe with nearly
ninety men reported as incapable of undertaking the journey to California
because of physical ailments. Accompanying them were a number of women and
children. Sanderson, the physician, discharged some of these men without
pay or means to procure conveyance to the states, whereupon Colonel
Doniphan, in charge of the post, went to Col. Cooke and countermanded the
order with the statement that General Kearny would never discharge a man
under circumstances of that kind, and ordered the men with the laundresses
and others, to be sent to Pueblo and to draw their pay. Their journey took
them over a rough country a distance of some two hundred miles. Several
died on the way and others succumbed after Pueblo was reached. They
arrived November 17 and selected a place for winter quarters near the
encampment of Captain Higgins and a company of Saints who had previously
arrived in Pueblo from Mississippi, on their way to the Rocky Mountains.
November 10, 1846, Lieutenant William W. Willis was also ordered back to
Pueblo with another company of sick—fifty-six men—from a point
about one hundred miles out from Santa Fe. They commenced their journey
with one wagon, four yoke of oxen, and rations barely sufficient to last
them five days, on a march of three hundred miles. After a most severe and
toilsome journey, in which they all suffered many privations and some laid
down their lives, the company arrived in Pueblo, in an emaciated
condition, December 24, 1846.
The March From Santa Fe
The march of the battalion from Santa Fe was taken up
October 19, 1846. They had not traveled very far before they were reduced
to the extremity of using their poor oxen, which were barely skin and
bones, for food. Even their raw hides were cut in small pieces and made
into soup. At times they crossed deserts where water could not be found to
quench their thirst, and their tongues became swollen and their lips
parched until their strength failed them.
Colonel Cooke’s Comment
Writing of the condition of the battalion when he took
command, Colonel Cooke made a report in the following words:
“Everything conspired to discourage the extraordinary
undertaking of marching this battalion eleven hundred miles, for the
much greater part through an unknown wilderness, without road or trail,
and with a wagon train.“It was enlisted too much by families; some were too
old—some feeble, and some too young; it was embarrassed by many
women; it was undisciplined; it was much worn by traveling on foot, and
marching from Nauvoo, Illinois; their clothing was very scant; there was
no money to pay them, or clothing to issue; their mules were utterly
broken down; the quartermaster department was without funds, and its
credit bad; mules were scarce. Those procured were very inferior, and
were deteriorating every hour for lack of forage or grazing. .
. .“With every effort, the quartermaster could only
undertake to furnish rations for sixty days; and, in fact, full rations,
of only flour, sugar, coffee and salt; salt pork only for thirty days,
and soap for twenty. To venture without pack-saddles would be grossly
imprudent, and so that burden was added.”2
A Battle with Wild Bulls
A short distance northwest of the site of the present
city of El Paso the course of the march was towards the west. On the San
Pedro River they encountered herds of wild cattle, and were viciously
attacked by ferocious bulls. The troops had been ordered to travel with
unloaded guns, but now they were hastily forced to load without waiting
the command. These vicious animals, as if resenting the encroachment on
their domain, made a charge upon the camp. This constituted the only
fighting the troops were called upon to do on their long and toilsome
march. When the battle was over the casualties revealed a number of gored
mules and overturned wagons, and among the “enemy” perhaps some sixty of
the charging animals were killed. Resuming their journey they camped on
the 16th of December, near the Mexican pueblo of Tucson. On their way they
met three Mexican soldiers bringing a message from the governor of Tucson
to Colonel Cooke, informing him that he must pass around the town, or else
he would have to fight. Colonel Cooke was not to be frightened by such an
order. His route would take him through the village, and hither he resumed
his march. The following day he passed through Tucson without meeting
opposition, as the soldiers and a great many of the citizens had fled on
his approach. Before arriving at that place he instructed his men that
they came not to make war on Sonora, and less still to destroy an
important outpost of defense against Indians. “But,” said he, “we will
take the straight road before us and overcome all resistance, but shall I
remind you that the American soldier ever shows justice and kindness to
the unarmed and unresisting? The property of individuals you will hold
sacred: the people of Sonora are not our enemies.”
The Journey From Tucson
Leaving Tucson, the battalion crossed an extensive
desert, where, for seventy-five miles, they were without water for their
mules. By hard marching they reached the Gila River and intersected
General Kearny’s trail, which they had left 474 miles behind in the valley
of the Rio Grande. They were now in the land of the Pima and Maricopa
Indians who inhabited a fertile territory. These were a superior race of
Indians with peaceful tendencies, who spent their time tilling the soil,
and in weaving rather than bearing arms. While passing through these
villages Colonel Cooke remarked to Captain Jefferson Hunt that this might
be a good place for the settlement of the “Mormon” people. Hunt proposed
such a thing to the natives who received it favorably, and this may have
lent its weight to the colonizing of these valleys by the Latter-day
Saints in later years.
At this point they were met by pilots sent back by
General Kearny to conduct them to the Pacific coast. Most of the distance
on the remaining journey was over deserts with alternating stretches of
deep sand and miry clay. January 9, 1847, they crossed the Colorado, near
the junction of the Gila, and continued their march under great
difficulties over the coast range down the Pacific slope. January 27,
1847, they passed San Luis Rey, and two days later arrived at the San
Diego Mission where they located one mile below the Catholic mission, and
about five miles from the seaport town of San Diego, where General Kearny
had his quarters.
“Orders No. 1”
On the day after their arrival at San Diego, Colonel
Cooke issued the following orders, which were read to the men:
“Headquarters ‘Mormon’ Battalion,
“Mission of San Diego,
“January 30, 1847.”“(Orders No. 1.)
“The Lieutenant-Colonel commanding, congratulates the
battalion on their safe arrival on the shore of the Pacific Ocean, and
the conclusion of their march of over two thousand miles.“History may be searched in vain for an equal march of
infantry. Half of it has been through a wilderness where nothing but
savages and wild beasts are found, or deserts where, for want of water,
there is no living creature. There, with almost hopeless labor, we have
dug deep wells, which the future traveler will enjoy. Without a guide
who had traversed them we have ventured into trackless table-lands where
water was not found for several marches. With crowbar and pick and axe
in hand, we have worked our way over mountains, which seemed to defy
aught save the wild goat, and hewed a passage through a chasm of living
rock more narrow than our wagons. To bring these first wagons to the
Pacific, we have preserved the strength of our mules by herding them
over large tracts, which you have laboriously guarded without loss. The
garrison of four presidios of Sonora concentrated within the walls of
Tucson, gave us no pause. We drove them out, with their artillery, but
our intercourse with the citizens was unmarked by a single act of
injustice. Thus, marching half naked and half fed, and living upon wild
animals, we have discovered and made a road of great value to our
country.“Arrived at the first settlement of California, after
a single day’s rest, you cheerfully turned off from the route to this
point of promised repose, to enter upon a campaign, and meet, as we
supposed, the approach of the enemy; and this, too, without even salt to
season your sole subsistence of fresh meat.“Lieutenants A. J. Smith and George Stoneman, of
the First Dragoons, have shared and given invaluable aid in all these
labors.“Thus, volunteers, you have exhibited some high and
essential qualities of veterans. But much remains undone. Soon you will
turn your attention to the drill, to system and order, to forms also,
which are all necessary to the soldier.“By order,
“Lieut. Col. P. St. George Cooke,
“P. C. Merrill, Adjutant.”
Duties on the Coast
For some time the battalion performed garrison duty at
San Diego, San Luis Rey and Los Angeles. While stationed at the latter
place they were called upon to guard the Cajon Pass, in the Sierra Nevada
mountains, against hostile Indians. At San Diego they were employed
digging wells, making brick and building houses. Their frugality and
industry won the admiration of the other troops, except the Missourians of
General Fremont’s command, who endeavored to create prejudice against them.
The Discharge of the Battalion—Stevenson’s
Insult
July 16, 1847, all of the battalion at Los Angeles were
mustered out of service by Captain Smith. The time of their enlistment had
expired and the prophecy of President Brigham Young that they would not be
called upon to fight, had been fulfilled. Some of the men, at the request
of Colonel Stevenson, of the New York Volunteers, re-enlisted for six
months. Others might have done so, but he insulted them by saying: “Your
patriotism and obedience to your officers have done much towards removing
the prejudice of the government and the community at large, and I am
satisfied that another year’s service would place you on a level with
other communities.”
The Journey to Salt Lake Valley
On the 20th of July most of the members of the
battalion, who did not enlist, organized preparatory to going to the Rocky
Mountains to the gathering place of the Saints. They went by way of
Sutter’s Fort and the Sacramento River, intending to follow Fremont’s
trail across the Sierras. Near Lake Tahoe, they met Samuel Brannan and
Captain Brown of the Pueblo detachment who were on the way to California,
and learned that the pioneers had entered the Salt Lake Valley. Captain
Brown carried with him an epistle from the apostles advising all members
of the battalion who had no means, to remain in California for the winter,
and journey to the Salt Lake Valley in the spring. Acting on this advice
about one half of the members obtained employment at Sutter’s Fort, where
they were employed at the time of the discovery of gold. The others pushed
on to the Salt Lake Valley where they arrived October 16, 1847.
Notes
The five companies of the battalion were commanded respectively as
follows: Company A, Jefferson Hunt; Company B, Jesse D. Hunter; Company C,
James Brown; Company D, Nelson Higgins; Company E, Daniel C. Davis. Before
they left Winter Quarters, a farewell ball was given them in “Father
Taylor’s Bowery,” where the afternoon was spent in dancing and such
merriment as the sadness of the approaching parting would admit.
Conquest of New Mexico and California, by P.
St. George Cooke, p. 91–2.
Chapter 39
Revelation to President Brigham Young
January 14, 1847, the word of the Lord came to President
Brigham Young, at Winter Quarters, giving instructions for the guidance of
the camps of Israel on their journeyings to the west. The Saints were to
be organized into companies, with captains over hundreds, fifties and
tens, as the case had been while journeying across Iowa. These companies
were to be presided over by a president and two counselors, under the
direction of the Twelve Apostles, who were at the head of all the camps of
Israel. The Saints were to enter into a covenant “to keep all the
commandments and statutes of the Lord,” and each company was to bear an
equal proportion of the responsibility in the care of the widows, the
fatherless, and the families of those who had gone into the army. Every
man was commanded to use his influence and property to remove the body of
the people to the place the Lord had designated as a stake of Zion; and if
they would do this they were to be blessed abundantly in their substance
and in their families. Moreover, they were to prepare houses and fields
for those who were to remain behind that season, that they might prepare
also for the journey.
Cheerfulness Commanded
“If thou art merry,” the revelation read (Doc. and Cov.
Sec. 136), “praise the Lord with singing, with music, with dancing, and
with prayer of praise and thanksgiving. If thou art sorrowful, call on the
Lord thy God with supplication, that your souls may be joyful.” During
their travels in the wilderness the exiled Saints had many hardships to
endure. The lack of necessary food, of clothing and other substance, was
lamentable. Yet, in the midst of poverty and distress, they were happy for
they were free from enemies and the persecutions of mobs. They were going
to a land of promise where they could dwell in peace, and worship the Lord
without fear of men. The Lord desired that they should be cheerful and
promised to bless them with his Spirit, in the hour of their sorrow, if
they would call upon him. That they might be light of heart and filled
with joy, the Lord commended music, singing and dancing, if done in the
spirit of reverence and prayer. It was the custom, at the close of the
day’s journey, for the Saints to assemble in the dance, or to have an
informal concert; to relate reminiscences and otherwise employ their time,
that the cares and hardships of their travel might be forgotten, and their
burdens lessened which they were forced to bear.1 At the sound of
the bugle, night and morning, all assembled for prayer. The Sabbath day
was strictly kept, and undue levity was discountenanced in all the camps.
They were commanded to be honest, sober, unselfish and to “contend not one
with another,” but always speak with edifying words.
The Pioneers
It was commanded in the revelation that a company be
organized to depart early in the spring, composed of a sufficient number
of able-bodied and experienced men, with teams, seeds and farming
utensils, to prepare for the planting of spring crops. As spring
approached preparations were under way for the departure of this pioneer
band, and for other companies, as the Saints were able, to follow after.
February 26, 1847, President Brigham Young met in council with the members
of the twelve who were at Winter Quarters and Bishop Newel K. Whitney,
William Clayton and Jedediah M. Grant. The object of this meeting was to
consider the appointment of a pioneer company and their requirements for
the journey. The matter of constructing boats, the carrying of seeds,
scientific investigations, the location of a site for a city, the
irrigation, cultivation and seeding of the land, were all fully discussed.
This is the first reference, so far as the records show, of the discussion
of irrigation, which President Young and the brethren felt would be
necessary for their sustenance in their new home.
The Departure for the West
Elder Heber C. Kimball, under instructions from
President Brigham Young, moved out of Winter Quarters, April 5, 1847, with
six wagons, which he had equipped as a part of the pioneer company. They
traveled about six miles and camped, awaiting the arrival of the rest of
the company. On the 6th of April, the general conference was held in
Winter Quarters, and the following day President Young, with about
twenty-five wagons, traveled some ten miles and camped. From this point
the company which had assembled, continued their journey to the Elkhorn
River, where the information reached them that Elder Parley P. Pratt had
arrived at Winter Quarters from his mission to England, and that Elder
John Taylor was on the way. President Young decided to return, with other
members of the twelve, to receive Elder Pratt’s report of conditions in
that foreign field.2 A few days later Elder John Taylor also
arrived, bringing with him two thousand dollars in gold, contributed by
the Saints in Great Britain, to help the exiles on their westward journey.
He also had with him a number of scientific instruments of great value,
including two sextants, one circle of reflection, two artificial horizons,
and a number of barometers, thermometers and telescopes.
Organization of the Pioneer Camp
Leaving Elders Pratt and Taylor—and later Orson
Hyde who joined them from England—in charge of the Saints at Winter
Quarters, President Young, with the other apostles, returned to the
pioneer camp, which had journeyed to a position twelve miles west of the
Elkhorn, and some forty-seven miles west of Winter Quarters. President
Young’s departure from Winter Quarters was on the morning of April 14,
1847, and on the 16th, the pioneer camp was organized with captains of
hundreds, fifties and tens, as follows:
Captains of Hundreds: Stephen Markham and Albert P.
Rockwood.
Captains of Fifties: Addison Everett, Tarlton Lewis,
James Case, John Pack, Shadrack Roundy.
Captains of Tens: Wilford Woodruff, Ezra T. Benson,
Phineas H. Young, Luke S. Johnson,3 Stephen G. Goddard,
Charles Shumway, James Case, Seth Taft, Howard Egan, Appleton M. Harmon,
John S. Higbee, Norton Jacobs, John Brown, and Joseph Matthews.
The total number of souls in the camp was one hundred
and forty-eight, of whom three were women and two were children. The women
were: Harriet Page Wheeler Young, wife of Lorenzo D. Young; Clarissa
Decker Young, wife of Brigham Young; and Ellen Saunders Kimball, wife of
Heber C. Kimball. Three of the company were colored: Hark Lay, Oscar
Crosby and Green Flake, who had come west with the emigrants from
Mississippi, under command of John Brown in the summer of 1846. Originally
the pioneer company was composed of one hundred and forty-four men, but
one, Ellis Ames, was taken sick and returned to Winter Quarters soon after
the start. Two of the pioneers were not members of the Church.
Military Organization
In addition to the organization mentioned, on April 17,
they were also organized into a military camp with President Brigham Young
as lieutenant-general; Stephen Markham, colonel; John Pack and Shadrack
Roundy, majors; and the captains of tens, as formerly organized, to hold
similar rank in the military organization. Thomas Bullock was appointed
clerk of the camp, with some assistants, and Thomas Tanner, captain of the
cannon, with the privilege of choosing eight men to assist him.
Division of the Watch
The captains of tens selected forty-eight men for a
constant night guard. They were divided into four watches to serve half a
night at a time. President Young and others of the twelve were among the
members of this guard. As there was danger of Indian raids, orders were
given that every man should keep by the side of his wagon and not leave it
except by permission, and he should carry a loaded gun always ready for
instant use.
Regulations of the Camp
Sunday, April 18, 1847, in the afternoon, President
Young met with the captains of the camp and decided on the details for the
government of the camp as follows:
“At 5 o’clock in the morning the bugle is to be
sounded as a signal for every man to arise and attend prayers before he
leaves his wagon. Then the people will engage in cooking, eating,
feeding teams, etc., until 7 o’clock, at which time the train is to move
at the sound of the bugle. Each teamster is to keep beside his team with
loaded gun in hand or within easy reach, while the extra men, observing
the same rule regarding their weapons, are to walk by the side of their
particular wagons to which they belong; and no man may leave his post
without permission of his officer. In case of an attack or any hostile
demonstration by Indians, the wagons will travel in double file—
the order of encampment to be in a circle, with the mouth of each wagon
to the outside and the horses and cattle tied inside the circle. At 8:30
p.m., the bugles are to be sounded again, upon which signal all will
hold prayers in their wagons, and be retired to rest by 9 o’clock.”
The Route of Travel
The line of travel taken by the pioneers was along the
north bank of the Platte River to Fort Laramie, and from there they
crossed the river, and continued over the Oregon trail up the Sweetwater
and over the Continental divide through the South Pass across Green River
to Fort Bridger. They then traveled to the southwest through Echo Canyon,
and East Canyon over Big and Little Mountain into Emigration Canyon, and
then to the valley of the Great Salt Lake.
On the south side of the Platte was the Oregon trail,
but the pioneers remained on the north bank where there was no trail, for
reasons expressed by Elder Wilford Woodruff as follows:
“We were convinced that it would be better for us as a
company to cross the river and take the old traveled road to Laramie as
there was good grass all the way on that side, while the Indians were
burning it all off on the north of the river where we were traveling. But
when we took into consideration the situation of the next company, and the
thousands that would follow, and as we were the Pioneers and had not our
wives and children with us—we thought it best to keep on the north
side of the river and brave the difficulties of burning prairies to make a
road that should stand as a permanent route for the Saints, independent of
the then immigrant road, and let the river separate the emigrating
companies that they need not quarrel for wood, grass, or water; and when
our next company came along, the grass would be much better for them than
it would be on the south side, as it would grow up by the time they would
get along; and the vote was called and it was unanimous to go on the north
side of the river; so the camp again moved on.”
Measuring the Distance
The pioneers were anxious to know the distance of each
day’s travel and the length of the entire journey. In order to obtain this
information they first resorted to guesswork, but this proved
unsatisfactory. They then tied a piece of cloth to a wheel of one of the
wagons and a man was placed on duty to count the revolutions. However,
this was tedious though accurate if the count was correctly kept. April 19
William Clayton suggested to Orson Pratt that a set of wooden cog wheels
might be attached to the wheel of a wagon to record the distance
automatically. The result was that an odometer was constructed on “the
principle of the endless screw” and was installed during the month of May,
after they were well along on the journey.
Dangers on the Way
The pioneers were under the necessity of keeping
constantly on the alert to protect themselves from attacks by Indians.
They had considerable anxiety while passing through the Pawnee tribes. At
times the brethren were fired upon. The Indians made several attempts at
night to creep into the camp, evidently to plunder and steal animals. At
one time before the camp was organized for the night they were successful
in stealing two of the best horses belonging to Dr. Willard Richards and
Jesse C. Little. The following day, April 27, a party was sent out to
search for the missing animals. They encountered a number of Indians who
endeavored to decoy them to a point where the brethren would be in their
power, but they were on the alert and well armed, so the Indians dared not
make an attack. As the brethren prepared to return to camp the Indians
fired upon them, whereupon the searching party turned upon their foe, and
the Indians hastily fled.
Not all of the Indians, however, were hostile. Generally
they showed a friendly spirit, but were ever ready to commit theft. The
brethren at times gave them a few articles such as powder, lead, flour and
salt.
Correspondence on the Plains
On the 4th of May, after the camp had proceeded about
two miles on their way, they were met by a Frenchman, Charles Beaumont, a
trapper and fur trader, who was traveling eastward over the Oregon road
with a camp consisting of three wagons and nine men. He crossed the river
to find out who the pioneers were. During his interview he cheerfully
consented to carry letters back to the Saints, so the brethren wrote some
fifty or sixty letters and left them in his care. Other means of
communication with the later companies on the plains were adopted. Posts
were placed at prominent points along the road with writing on them and
letters were placed in improvised boxes with a notice on the box. At other
times they used whitened skulls of the buffalo. Over a portion of the
journey, especially from Fort Laramie, the pioneers planted mile posts
every ten miles as the distance was measured by their odometer.
Scientific Observations
Astronomical observations were constantly taken. The
temperature was recorded daily, also the altitude as shown by barometrical
pressure. This was done under the able direction of Elder Orson Pratt, one
of the great scientists of his time.
Crossing of the Platte
At Fort Laramie the pioneers were forced to cross the
Platte owing to the fact that the north side of the river was impassable.
They hired a flatboat from a Frenchman, Mr. James Bordeaux, who was in
charge of the post. They paid him fifteen dollars for the accommodation.
Mr. Bordeaux treated the brethren very kindly, and informed them that
Lilburn W. Boggs, with a company of Missourians en route to Oregon, left
the fort but a short time before. These emigrants had endeavored to
embitter him against the “Mormons.” The Missourians, he said, were
constantly quarreling and were great thieves. Bordeaux gave the pioneers
information regarding the route before them and said the Crow Indians were
troublesome and had lately run off all the horses and mules from the fort.
The Mississippi Emigrants
Soon after the pioneers arrived at Fort Laramie they
were joined by a company of seventeen emigrants of the Mississippi Saints
who had wintered at Pueblo, where the sick detachments of the Mormon
Battalion, under command of Captains Brown and Higgins, were also
stationed. They had been at the fort two weeks awaiting the arrival of the
pioneers. These emigrants consisted of the members of the Crow and
Therlkill families, others being Archibald Little, James Chesney and Lewis
B. Myers. They had five wagons, one cart, eleven horses, twenty-four oxen,
twenty-two cows, three bulls and seven calves. From these Mississippi
Saints the pioneers obtained their first knowledge in many months, of the
battalion. Four of the pioneers, Amasa M. Lyman, Thomas Woolsey, John H.
Tippits, and Roswell Stevens, were sent to Pueblo on horse-back and with
mules, to take charge of the remaining body of the Mississippians and
conduct them to the Salt Lake Valley.
The Ferry at the Black Hills
From Winter Quarters to Fort Laramie the Pioneers had
broken a new road over the plains, which was destined to be traveled by
the emigrating Saints for many years. Subsequently the Union Pacific
Railroad was built along a great portion of the trail. Continuing their
journey, the pioneers arrived, Saturday, June 12, 1847, at the Black
Hills, where the Oregon road crossed the Platte, some one hundred and
forty-two miles from Fort Laramie. Here they overtook the Oregon
emigrants, including the Missourians. The pioneers had sent an advance
company three days before to prepare for the crossing of the river, with a
sole-leather skiff capable of carrying eighteen hundred pounds. These
brethren were employed in ferrying the emigrants over the river at the
rate of $1.50 for each wagon load, receiving their pay in flour, meal and
bacon, at Missouri prices. Their stock of provisions at this time was in
need of replenishing, and to have the privilege of ferrying their old
enemies from Missouri over the river at this price, gave them some
satisfaction. “It looked as much of a miracle to me,” said Elder Wilford
Woodruff, “to see our flour and meal bags replenished in the Black Hills,
as it did to have the children of Israel fed with manna in the wilderness.
But the Lord has been truly with us on our journey, and has wonderfully
blessed and preserved us.” The Missourians kept on their way, quarreling,
cursing and fighting among themselves, while the brethren camped, as was
their custom, on the Sabbath day. Monday, June 14, they commenced crossing
the river, taking their wagons on light rafts made of poles. It was
concluded to leave several brethren at this ferry, to help the oncoming
emigrant trains for Oregon, in the hope of earning enough to supply the
pioneer company with provisions. For this purpose Thomas Grover, John S.
Higbee, Luke S. Johnson, Appleton M. Harmon, Edmund Ellsworth, Francis M.
Pomeroy, William Empey, James Davenport and Benjamin F. Stewart, were
detailed to remain.
Discouraging Reports
In this region of the country the pioneers were
constantly meeting with trappers and traders who were familiar with the
Salt Lake Valley. They all gave discouraging reports of that region and
advised the Saints to locate elsewhere. They spoke more favorably of the
Cache, the Bear and other valleys to the north. Among those giving this
adverse advice were Major Moses Harris, Thomas L. Smith and Colonel James
Bridger. The latter informed President Young that he deemed it unwise to
bring a large colony into the Great Basin until it was demonstrated that
it would be possible to raise grain there. He stated that he would give a
thousand dollars if he knew an ear of corn could ripen in Salt Lake
Valley. Undaunted by these unfavorable reports President Young with his
band of pioneers pushed on with great vigor.
The Meeting with Samuel Brannan
Wednesday, June 30, 1847, the pioneers arrived at the
Green River. The water was very high, with a swift current. After dinner
the brethren commenced making two rafts with which to cross the stream.
While they were at work Samuel Brannan came into the camp, having come
from San Francisco. He had traveled around Cape Horn, from New York to
California, with a company of emigrating Saints in the year 1846. Brannan
and two others had braved the dangers of the mountains through deep snows
to reach the camp of the pioneers, having left on the 4th of April. He
brought with him several numbers of his paper, The
California Star, and the latest news of the Mormon Battalion. He
labored diligently to get President Young to continue on to California and
not remain in the barren wastes of the Rocky Mountains. President Young,
however, was following the inspiration of the Lord, and not the wisdom of
man. The Lord had pointed out to him—as he had to the Prophet Joseph
Smith in 1842—that the place of settlement for the Latter-day Saints
was in the “midst of the Rocky Mountains.”
An Uninviting Country
It should be remembered that in 1847, the Salt Lake
Valley was desolate and uninviting. There was little vegetation save the
stubby growth of salt-grass, grease-wood and sage that covered the valley,
and the few willows and cottonwood trees that stood on the banks of the
canyon streams. At that time the Rocky Mountain region and a large part of
the plains to the east were little known. The few emigrants who had passed
through the Great Basin had made haste to get beyond and into the more
inviting parts on the Pacific coast. This vast inter-mountain country was
the haunt of the trapper and the hunter, to whom the possibilities and
resources of the arid west were not even a dream. The valleys of the
mountains had been occupied for upwards of twenty years by these nomads of
the desert, who wandered from place to place hunting and trapping, content
in the belief that the wild and primitive condition which then prevailed
must so remain forever.
As late as 1843, two years before the exodus, the
opinion held by the majority in the United States was that the whole
territory of the Rocky Mountains was not worth a “pinch of snuff.” Such
was the expression made by Senator George H. McDuffie, of South Carolina,
in the senate that year. Discussing the settlement of Oregon, he said:
“Who are to go there, along the line of military posts, and take
possession of the only part of the territory fit to occupy—that part
upon the sea coast, a strip less than one hundred miles in width. Why,
sir, of what use will this be for agricultural purposes? I would not for
that purpose give a pinch of snuff for the whole territory. I wish to God
we did not own it.”4
The inspiration which came to the Prophet Joseph Smith
in 1842—and even earlier and which was converted into reality by
Brigham Young—shines forth with increased lustre when placed in
contrast with the united opinions of all those who were familiar with the
land in the year 1847.
Arrival of the Battalion Members from Pueblo
July 1, 1847, the men commenced ferrying over Green
River which was continued until Saturday the 3rd. In the evening of
Saturday, the camp was called together and the men who desired to journey
back to meet their families who were on the plains and supposed to be
several hundred miles in the rear, were given that privilege. Five
volunteered to return. President Young, Heber C. Kimball and Willard
Richards accompanied the five brethren back to the ferry on Green River.
Here they saw a group of thirteen men, with horses and baggage on the
opposite side of the river ready to be ferried across. They were members
of the Mormon Battalion journeying from Pueblo. They were given three
cheers and President Young “led out in exclaiming Hosannah! Hosannah! Give
glory to God and the Lamb, Amen!” These men were in pursuit of horse
thieves who had stolen several of the battalion horses, of which they had
recovered all but one or two. They reported to President Young that the
Pueblo detachment of the battalion was within seven days’ march of the
Green River. It was decided that as the members of the battalion had not
been discharged nor had they received their pay, Samuel Brannan and Thomas
S. Williams should return with them to California to pilot them on the
way. Brannan was greatly disappointed at the decision of President Young
to locate in the Salt Lake Valley.
President Young and companions returned to the pioneer
camp with twelve of the members of the battalion, Sunday afternoon, July
4. One of the soldiers, William Walker, had decided to accompany the five
brethren back to the camps of the Saints. Sunday was spent by the pioneers
in religious service under the direction of the bishops.
Orson Pratt’s Vanguard
Monday, July 5, 1847, the company took up their march
and arrived at Fort Bridger on the 7th, where they camped. Here they
repaired the wagons and shod their horses, preparatory for the rough
mountain travel which would lead them to the end of their journey. July 9,
they continued on to the head of Echo Canyon, which was reached on the
12th. At this place President Young was taken ill with mountain fever. He
ordered Elder Orson Pratt to take a company and precede the main body of
pioneers into the Salt Lake Valley. This advance company, consisting of
twenty-five wagons and forty-two men, traveled down Echo Canyon, with
instructions to look for the trail of the Reed-Donner party.5
This they found after some difficulty, for it was almost obliterated. It
was necessary for a detachment with proper tools to go on ahead and
construct a road for the wagons. From this point on to their destination,
they encountered the most difficult portion of the road over which they
traveled. They passed down into East Canyon and over Big and Little
Mountains into Emigration Canyon, which they named “Last Creek.” July 21,
President Brigham Young sent Erastus Snow to meet Orson Pratt with a
message for him to bear northward after entering the valley, and select
the first convenient place for plowing and planting seed. The reason for
this apparent haste was that the season was well advanced and every moment
counted in the growing of their seed. Elder Snow overtook Orson Pratt on
the afternoon of the 21st and together they entered the valley, with one
horse between them. Seeing what looked like a field of waving grain to the
south, they first journeyed in that direction only to find that they saw
canes growing near the banks of what is known today as Mill Creek.
Remembering the words of President Young, they retraced their steps and
passed on to the north. When near the mouth of Emigration Canyon, Erastus
Snow discovered he had lost his coat which was thrown over the saddle and
he went back to find it, while Orson Pratt continued on to the north to
the present site of Salt Lake City. The following day others of the
advance company entered the valley.
The Land Dedicated
July 23, they moved north and camped on what was
subsequently known as the Eighth ward square, now occupied by the Salt
Lake City and County Building. Orson Pratt called the camp together,
dedicated the land and invoked a blessing on the seed they were about to
plant. The ground was found so hard that the first attempt to plow was
unsuccessful, and several plow-points were broken. By placing a dam in the
stream (City Creek) they soaked the ground and in the course of a few days
several acres were plowed and planted. The season being so late nothing
came of their planting, save the garnering of potatoes about the size of a
pea or a walnut, which served for seed the following year and produced a
good crop.
“This is the Place”
On the 24th of July, 1847, President Brigham Young with
the main body of the pioneers, entered the valley. He was resting in a
carriage driven by Elder Wilford Woodruff and as they emerged from the
canyon and pulled up onto a ridge President Young, who was ill, requested
Elder Woodruff to turn his carriage around so that he could look upon the
valley. This was done, and President Young gazed in silence for a few
moments. Then with an expression of satisfaction, he said, “This is the
place, drive on.” They entered into the valley and camped with the members
who had preceded them. They had found the promised land and a resting
place for their weary feet, where they could fulfil the predictions of the
Prophet Joseph Smith, and become a mighty people in the midst of the Rocky
Mountains.
Notes
1. Outcasts from “civilization,” with little to eat
and little to wear; with few expressions of sympathy, and less help
extended in their direction, it was only natural that the Saints on the
plains at times would be despondent. President Young constantly labored to
cheer and strengthen them. Shortly before the departure of the Pioneer
band, he requested Elder William Clayton to write something that would
encourage the people. Within two hours Elder Clayton had written the
following remarkable hymn, and set it to the music of “All is Well,” an
old English tune:
Come, come, ye Saints, no toil nor labor fear;
But with joy wend your way.
Though hard to you this journey may appear,
Grace shall be as your day.
’Tis better far for us to strive
Our useless cares from us to drive;
Do this, and joy your hearts will swell—
All is well! All is well!
. . .
And should we die before our journey’s through,
Happy day! All is well!
We then are free from toil and sorrow, too;
With the just we shall dwell!
But if our lives are spared again
To see the Saints their rest obtain,
Oh, how we’ll make this chorus swell—
All is well! All is well!
Elders Orson Hyde, Parley P. Pratt and John Taylor had been sent to
England, after the exodus from Nauvoo, to set the British Mission in
order. Elders Reuben Hedlock and Thomas Ward, who were in charge, had
misappropriated the funds of “The Joint Stock Company,” an organization
which had been formed for the purpose of assisting the Saints of the
British Isles to emigrate. The three apostles took charge of affairs and
soon had the mission again in a flourishing condition. Early in 1847, they
again returned to the United States, Elders Pratt and Taylor preceding
Elder Hyde, who remained to install Elder Orson Spencer as president of
that mission. Elder Orson Spencer, a man of culture and superior
education, performed an excellent work and under his ministry the mission
flourished.
Luke S. Johnson, formerly of the council of the apostles, came to
Nauvoo in 1846 in a repentant spirit, and asked to be reinstated in the
Church. He was baptized and was forced to leave that place with the body
of the Saints. He was chosen as one of the pioneer band to come in advance
to the Salt Lake Valley. In the year 1858, he settled at St. Johns, Tooele
County, where he was ordained a bishop. He died in Salt Lake City,
December 9, 1861.
Congressional Globe, 27th Congress, 3rd Session, pp. 198–201.
The Reed-Donner party, comprised seventy-eight men, women and
children, under the direction of James F. Reed and George Donner, who left
Independence in May, 1846, for California. They came via Fort Bridger,
Echo and East Canyons through Emigration and westward through the Salt
Lake and Tooele Valleys, around the south end of Salt Lake. Delayed by
many misfortunes, they were caught in the snows in the Sierras in the
winter of 1846, where many of them perished. Near the close of that year
several of the ill-fated party put on snowshoes and crossed to the
Sacramento Valley for relief. A relief expedition was sent back and found
that the survivors had been living for weeks on the flesh of their dead,
like cannibals. Thirty-nine of the original company had perished.
Chapter 40
The First Sabbath in the Valley
July 25, 1847, was the Sabbath. It was a pleasant day,
and at ten o’clock the pioneers met in worship in the circle of their
encampment. Elders George A. Smith, Heber C. Kimball and Ezra T. Benson
were the speakers. They expressed gratitude for the blessings of the Lord
during their travels to this promised land. Not a soul had died on the
toilsome journey. In the afternoon another service was held and the
sacrament was administered. Elders Wilford Woodruff, Orson Pratt and
Willard Richards were the speakers at this service. The principal address
was given by Elder Pratt who took for his text Isaiah 52:7–8: “How
beautiful upon the mountains are the feet of him that bringeth good
tidings; that publisheth peace,” etc. He stated that the predictions of
the prophets were now being fulfilled.
President Young’s Advice
President Young was too feeble to make any extended
remarks, but near the close of the services he gave some very important
advice. Elder Wilford Woodruff made a synopsis of his remarks as follows:
“He told the brethren that they must not work on Sunday; that they would
lose five times as much as they would gain by it. None were to hunt on
that day; and there should not any man dwell among us who would not
observe these rules. They might go and dwell where they pleased, but
should not dwell with us. He also said that no man who came here should
buy any land; that he had none to sell, but every man should have his land
measured out to him for city and farming purposes. He might till it as he
pleased, but he must be industrious and take care of it.” Later,
instructions were given that there should be no private ownership of the
streams, and only dead timber should be used for fuel, as trees were none
too plentiful and should be conserved. These regulations were adopted by
the community in justice to all, for it was expected that within a very
short time the Saints who were then on the plains—the exiles from
Nauvoo, some twenty thousand in number—and others coming from
various states and from Europe, would be gathered to the Rocky Mountains.
Explorations of the Valley
Naturally the pioneers were impatient to explore the
surrounding country. Their first duty was to plant the seed they brought
with them. Plowing began on the 23rd and continued during the 24th. Monday
morning, July 26th, a number of exploring companies were sent out,
including the eight apostles in the camp and Elders Albert Carrington,
William Clayton, John Brown and Joseph Matthews. The two latter crossed
the river, which was called the Utah Outlet and later the Western Jordan,
and ascended the mountains on the west of the valley. They reported, on
their return, that the land on that side of the valley was not as good as
the land on the east side. Some of the brethren penetrated some of the
canyons where they found timber of good quality. President Young, Wilford
Woodruff and others of the brethren visited the hot and also the warm
springs at the north end of the valley, and made some observations. Their
explorations continued for several days. On the 27th of July, they
explored the Tooele Valley. On the way they had a bath in the lake and
were much surprised at the buoyancy of the water. That night they camped
at Black Rock and the following day they traveled about ten miles south
along the eastern base of the Oquirrh Mountains, where, in the main, they
found a barren country and very little water. Orson Pratt ascended the
mountain where he obtained a view of Utah Lake, which he judged to be
about twenty miles away. Striking eastward across the valley they returned
to camp. On this trip they saw about one hundred goats, sheep and
antelope. They returned satisfied that the spot where the pioneers had
camped was the best on which their city could be built.
A Place for an Ensign
On the 26th, they also ascended the mountain above the
hot springs to get a better view of the surrounding country, and by aid of
their glasses were able to discern the Utah Outlet at the point of the
mountain, where it enters the Salt Lake Valley on the south. A number of
streams were also seen flowing from the mountains into the valley. As they
stood upon the mountain President Young remarked that it would be a good
place to lift up an ensign, referring to Isaiah’s prophecy; so they named
it “Ensign Peak,” by which name it has since been known. In later years a
flagstaff was placed upon it.
The Building of a City
After returning from their explorations on the 28th, a
council was held in the evening and it was decided to build a city. Some
of the brethren suggested that they explore further before deciding on a
site for a settlement. President Young replied that he was willing that
they should explore until they were satisfied, but every time a party went
out and returned he believed they would agree that this was the spot on
which they should locate.
It was decided that the city should be laid out in
blocks of ten acres each with streets eight rods wide running at right
angles. The blocks were to be divided into lots containing one and
one-quarter acres each, with exceptions in certain parts where the lay of
the land would be inconvenient for such arrangement. The houses were to be
of uniform distance from the street and only one house to a lot. “Upon
every alternate block four houses were to be built on the east, and four
on the west side of the square, but none on the north and south sides. But
the blocks intervening were to have four houses on the north and four on
the south, but none on the east and west sides. In this plan there will be
no houses fronting each other on the opposite sides of the streets, while
those on the same side will be about eight rods apart, having gardens
running back twenty rods to the center of the block.” Such was their
description. There were to be four public squares of ten acres each in
various parts of the city. “Let every man,” said President Young,
“cultivate his own lot and set out every kind of fruit and shade tree and
beautify the city.” This plan was laid before the camp and approved
unanimously.
The Place for the Temple
During the westward journey the building of a temple was
a constant theme. On the evening of the 28th of July, President Young and
the apostles with Thomas Bullock, the clerk, walked from their camp
northward to a spot between the forks of City Creek, and there President
Young designated a site for the building of a temple. Waving his hand he
said: “Here is the forty acres for the temple, and the city can be laid
out perfectly square north and south, east and west.”
Orson Pratt’s Survey
The survey of the city was made by Orson Pratt. His line
was on the southeast corner of the Temple Block. Beginning at that point
the city was marked out into blocks of ten acres each. It was decided by
the brethren that instead of using forty acres for the site it would be
better to have that block conform in size with the others. According to
Orson Pratt’s calculations, the latitude of the north boundary of the
Temple Block was 40 degrees, 35 minutes and 34 seconds. The longitude was
111 degrees, 26 minutes and 34 seconds west of Greenwich. The altitude was
4,300 feet above sea level. Later government observations varied from
these of Elder Pratt but slightly.
Arrival of the Battalion and Mississippi Members
In addition to the twelve members of the battalion and
the advance company of Mississippi Saints who came into the valley with
the pioneers,1 the detachments of the battalion who
wintered at Pueblo under the command of Captain James Brown and Nelson
Higgins, together with the main body of the Mississippi Saints, entered
the Salt Lake Valley, under direction of Captain James Brown, July 29,
1847. This increased the number in the camp to about four hundred souls.
They brought with them about sixty wagons, one hundred head of horses and
mules and three hundred head of cattle.
Immediately after their arrival the battalion members
built a bowery, the first structure in the valley in which public meetings
could be held with some degree of comfort, and the worshipers receive
protection from the excessive heat of the sun.
Renewal of Covenants
Having been unable to live in peace in former
habitations because of persecutions of wicked men, the Saints now rejoiced
at the prospect before them. It was proposed by President Young and the
apostles that they renew their covenants with the Lord and solemnly
promise that they would henceforth keep his commandments in this land
where they were free from religious persecution. In the humility and
thankfulness of their hearts for their deliverance, the apostles set the
example. August 6, President Young was baptized, and each of the apostles
were likewise baptized in turn. This was not done as an acknowledgment
that their former baptism was not efficacious, or that they had broken
covenants formerly received, but as an acknowledgment before the Lord of
their willingness to serve him henceforth and forever. To this proposition
all the camp of Israel said Amen, and the ordinance of baptism was
administered to all.
The First Births and Death in the Colony
The first birth in the pioneer camp was that of a
daughter to John and Catharine Campbell Steele, August 9, 1847. The father
was a member of the battalion and he and his wife had arrived in the camp
but a few days before. The child was named Young Elizabeth Steele, in
honor of President Brigham Young and Queen Elizabeth. Two days later the
colony was called upon to mourn because of the death of Milton H.
Therlkill, three years old, and son of George W. and Jane Therlkill, of
the Mississippi company. The child had wandered from the camp and was
drowned in City Creek. A few days later (August 15th) a daughter was born
to these same parents. This was the second birth in the colony.
The “Old Fort”
Three days after the Pioneers arrived in the valley,
Indians of the Ute and Shoshone tribes commenced visiting the camp,
begging and endeavoring to trade for guns and ammunition, and incidentally
to steal when opportunity afforded. On one occasion a fight ensued and the
Shoshones killed a Ute who had stolen one of their horses. President Young
instructed the Saints that they should trade no more with the Indians, who
were manifesting a spirit of jealousy because the pioneers treated one
tribe the same as the other.
As a means of protection against Indian raids and
thefts, it was decided to build a fort, or stockade, on one of the city
ten-acre squares. The site chosen is now known as Pioneer Park, three
blocks south and three west of the Temple Block. At a meeting held August
1, 1847, it was decided that the enclosure should be built of logs and
sundried bricks (adobes). The brethren immediately went to work preparing
the timbers and adobes for this purpose. August 10, work started on the
stockade. The walls were twenty-seven inches thick and nine feet high on
the outer side. It was built as a continuation of huts joined together in
rectangular form around the outside of the ten acres on which it stood.
The east side was built of logs, and the three other sides of adobe walls.
The roofs slanted but slightly inward, and were made of brush covered with
earth. Each house had a loop-hole facing the outside and a door and
windows facing the interior. The main entrances, which were on the east
and west sides of the stockade, were carefully guarded by heavy gates
which were locked at night. In the winter and spring months the snow and
rain caused the mud to leak through the roofs, to the great discomfort of
the inhabitants. Wagon covers, and other articles which would shed
moisture, were utilized, to protect beds and bedding. Notwithstanding the
discomforts and inconveniences of life under such conditions, the Saints
spent many pleasant hours within the walls of their temporary homes. Two
additional blocks were joined to the original fort, one on the north and
one on the south, to accommodate later arrivals in the valley. These were
designated as the North Fort and the South Fort, and were similar in
construction to the first, or Old Fort, as it was called. During the first
winter, schools were taught in the fort by Julian Moses and Miss Mary Ann
Dillworth.
Captain Brown’s Journey to the Coast
A question had arisen regarding the Pueblo detachment of
the Mormon Battalion. They were under orders to march to the Pacific
coast, but the term of their enlistment had expired. Should they go to the
coast to be mustered out of service, or should that duty be performed by
their company officers? After some deliberation it was decided that they
should be mustered out of service, and that Captain James Brown with a
small company should go to California and report to the army officers
there, and with a power of attorney from each of the men, draw their pay.
Captain Brown, with several members of the battalion, departed for San
Francisco, August 9, piloted by Samuel Brannan. Brannan returned to
California greatly disappointed because President Young would not hearken
to his counsel and continue on to the coast, where he thought conditions
for permanent settlement were more favorable than the desolate valleys of
the mountains. Captain Brown carried with him a message from President
Young to the battalion members on the coast, advising all who had no
families to remain in California through the winter and obtain work, and
in the spring come to the Salt Lake Valley with their earnings. Captain
Brown’s company went by way of the northern route and were accompanied as
far as Fort Hall, by Jesse C. Little, Joseph Matthews, John Brown and
others, who explored the Cache and Weber valleys. These brethren returned
with favorable reports.
Special Conference in the Valley
Sunday, August 22, 1847, a special conference was held
in the Salt Lake Valley. It was agreed to fence the city, and such
portions of adjacent lands as might be deemed proper for cultivation, thus
affording protection from cattle. “By this means,” said President Young,
“we can raise thousands of bushels of grain next season for ourselves and
also some to sustain those who shall come after us. I would rather fence a
block of ten acres, and have a crop, than plant a hundred acres for the
cattle to destroy.”
It was decided that a presidency and a high council be
appointed to preside over the Saints in the valley. Elder John Smith,
uncle of the Prophet Joseph Smith, who was at the time on the plains, was
chosen as president. President Young moved that “we call this place ‘The
Great Salt Lake City, of the Great Basin of North America,’” and that the
post office be called “The Great Basin Post Office.” Elder Heber C.
Kimball moved that the river running west of the settlement be called “The
Western Jordan.” Some of the creeks were also named as follows: City
Creek, Red Butte Creek, Canyon Creek (afterwards Emigration Creek) and Big
Canyon Creek (Parley’s Creek). Those streams farther to the south were not
named at that time.
At the close of the services Elder Heber C. Kimball
remarked: “This is a paradise to me, and one of the loveliest places I
ever beheld. I hope none of us will be left alive to pollute this land. I
would rather die than act as inconsistent as many have in times past.”
The Return of the Pioneers
President Young felt great anxiety for the companies of
Saints who were on the plains wending their way to the valley. There was
much to be done in order to care properly for those who had already
arrived, protect them from hostile Indians and prepare for the coming
winter season. This labor required his attention and that of the leading
brethren for some days. However, it was deemed necessary that a company
start back at once to meet the oncoming immigrants. Monday, August 2,
1847, it was decided in a council meeting, that Elder Ezra T. Benson with
a company of horsemen should start back immediately. About noon on that
day this company departed. They carried instructions from President Young
to obtain the names of all who were in the several camps, together with
the number of wagons, horses, oxen and other animals; also to ascertain
the condition of the health and needs of the immigrants, so that
assistance might be rendered where necessary. August 16 and 17, a company
selected from the original pioneers and battalion started back for this
purpose. This company consisted of seventy-one men, with thirty-three
wagons, fourteen mules and ninety-two yoke of oxen. It was divided into
two divisions with Tunis Rappleyee and Shadrach Roundy as captains. August
26, President Young and the apostles started on their return to Winter
Quarters. This company consisted of one hundred and eight men, thirty-six
wagons, seventy-one horses and forty-nine mules. They passed a number of
trains on the way to the valley, totaling more than fifteen hundred men,
women and children, with five hundred and sixty wagons and five thousand
head of stock. Among these immigrants were Elders Parley P. Pratt and John
Taylor of the council of the apostles, who were in charge of the companies.
President Young’s Instructions and Blessing
President Young arrived at Winter Quarters, October 31,
after an eventful journey back across the plains. When the company arrived
within a mile of Winter Quarters, President Young called them together and
made the following remarks:
“Brethren, I will say to the pioneers, I wish you
would receive my thanks for your kindness and willingness to obey
orders. I am satisfied with you; you have done well. We have
accomplished more than we expected. The one hundred and forty-three men
who started, some of them sick, are all well. Not a man has died; and we
have not lost a horse, mule or ox, except through carelessness. The
blessings of the Lord have been with us. If the brethren are satisfied
with me and the Twelve, please signify it with uplifted hands. (All
hands were raised.) I feel to bless you in the name of the Lord God of
Israel. You are dismissed to go to your homes.”
The company then drove into the town of Winter Quarters
in order, arriving about one hour before sunset. The streets of the town
were filled with eager people and the weary pioneers rejoiced once more to
behold their wives, children and friends.
Organization of a Stake of Zion
Sunday, October 3, 1847, the Saints in the Salt Lake
Valley met in conference and transacted business which had been proposed
by President Young and the apostles before their departure. “Uncle” John
Smith, who had been chosen before his arrival, was sustained as president
of the Salt Lake Stake of Zion, with Charles C. Rich and John Young as his
counselors. Members of the high council were also chosen as follows: Henry
G. Sherwood, Thomas Grover, Levi Jackman, John Murdock, Daniel Spencer,
Lewis Abbot, Ira Eldredge, Edson Whipple, Shadrach Roundy, John Vance,
Willard Snow and Abraham O. Smoot.
Charles C. Rich was also selected as chief military
commander under the direction of the stake authorities. Albert Carrington
was selected to act as clerk and historian of the city, and John Van Cott
as marshal.
Population at the Close of 1847
The last company to enter the valley in 1847 arrived in
October. The several companies were listed by Thomas Bullock as follows:
President Young’s pioneer company, 148; the Mississippi company, 47;
Mormon Battalion, 210; Daniel Spencer’s company, 204; Parley P. Pratt’s
company, 198; Abraham O. Smoot’s company, 139; Charles C. Rich’s company,
130; George B. Wallace’s company, 198; Edward Hunter’s company, 155;
Joseph Home’s company, 197; Joseph B. Noble’s company, 171; W. Snow’s
company, 148; and Jedediah M. Grant’s company, the last of the season,
150. The total being 2,095 souls for the year.
Notes
It is quite generally understood that there were three women who
entered the Salt Lake Valley with the pioneers in July, 1847. The fact has
been overlooked by many that there were other noble women, besides these
three who accompanied President Young across the plains, who braved the
dangers and hardships of the journey to the west. Among the Mississippi
Saints who met the pioneers at Fort Laramie and journeyed with them from
that point into the Salt Lake Valley, were the following: Elizabeth Crow,
Harriet Crow, Elizabeth J. Crow, Ira Vinda Exene Crow, Irmaninda Almarene
Crow and Marilla Jane Therlkill.
Chapter 41
Activities
Activities on the Missouri
As soon as the apostles arrived at Winter Quarters they
held council meetings almost daily, which continued during the months of
November and December, for there was much to be done. The Saints had been
greatly blessed in their crops and a good and abundant harvest had been
gathered. Instructions were given that all the Church records should be
gathered and prepared for removal to the Salt Lake Valley. The poor among
the Saints were also to be gathered, and instructions were given to the
people at Garden Grove to move to Winter Quarters in the spring. Elder
Jesse C. Little was called again to preside in the Eastern States and
Elder John Brown, who had led the Mississippi Saints to Pueblo, and later
was one of the pioneers, was called to take charge of the work in the
Southern States. November 8, it was decided to vacate Winter Quarters and
move to the east bank of the Missouri, and there make a settlement for the
members of the Church who were not able to continue to the west. All who
could leave in the spring for the west would be called upon to do so.
Elder Hyde, who had been presiding at Winter Quarters, reported that
action had been taken against Bishop George Miller and James Emmett, who,
contrary to counsel, had moved to Texas instead of continuing on to the
Rocky Mountains. This action was approved by the council of the twelve.
Elder Orson Pratt was chosen to go to England and preside in the British
Mission and Elder Wilford Woodruff to Canada. Some twenty-seven elders
were called to various mission fields. November 22, the brethren wrote a
letter to Oliver Cowdery, whose heart had softened, exhorting him to be
baptized.
Organization of the First Presidency
From the martyrdom of the Prophet Joseph and Patriarch
Hyrum Smith in 1844, until December, 1847, the Twelve Apostles, with
President Brigham Young at their head, were sustained as the presiding
council of the Church. On the return journey to Winter Quarters from the
Salt Lake Valley, the apostles conversed on the subject of reorganizing
the First Presidency. December 5, 1847, they met in council at the home of
Orson Hyde, on the east bank of the Missouri River, when this and other
important matters were considered. There were present at this meeting:
President Brigham Young, and Elders Heber C. Kimball, Orson Hyde, Orson
Pratt, Willard Richards, Wilford Woodruff, George A. Smith, Amasa M. Lyman
and Ezra T. Benson. Elders Parley P. Pratt and John Taylor were in the
Salt Lake Valley, and Lyman Wight, who had failed to accompany the Church
to the West, was in Texas. Elders Lyman and Benson had been called into
the council of the twelve to succeed William Smith and John E. Page, who
had been excommunicated because of insubordination and rebellion against
authority. Each of the brethren present expressed his views in turn in
relation to the matter of the First Presidency, after which, on motion of
Elder Orson Hyde, Brigham Young was unanimously sustained as President of
the Church “with authority to nominate” his two counselors. He chose Elder
Heber C. Kimball, as his first and Willard Richards, as his second
counselor. The choosing of Heber C. Kimball, was the fulfilment of a
prediction by the Patriarch Hyrum Smith. In a patriarchal blessing given
to Elder Kimball March 9, 1842, Hyrum Smith said: “You shall be blessed
with a fulness and shall be not one whit behind the chiefest; as an
apostle you shall stand in the presence of God to judge the people; and as
a prophet you shall attain to the honor of the three.” The following day
they selected “Uncle” John Smith to be “the Patriarch over the whole
Church.” Elders Orson Hyde and Ezra T. Benson were appointed to go east
and Amasa M. Lyman to the north to procure means to help the Saints to
emigrate the next season. The apostles also ordained Luke S. Johnson an
elder.
The Sustaining Vote of the Saints
A general conference of the Church on the Missouri was
held December 24 to 27, 1847, on the Iowa side of the Missouri River. A
large log tabernacle had been constructed which would seat nearly one
thousand persons. On the last day of this conference the First Presidency,
Brigham Young, Heber C. Kimball and Willard Richards, chosen by the
apostles on the 4th of the month, were unanimously sustained by the vote
of the Saints. John Smith was also sustained as the “Patriarch over all
the Church.” The action of this conference was subsequently ratified by
the members of the Church in Iowa and in the Salt Lake Valley, at
conferences held in April, 1848; and in the British Isles at a conference
held in Manchester, August 14, 1848.
The day before the conference convened (Dec. 23), a
general epistle was issued by the apostles to all the members of the
Church, “dispersed throughout the earth.” This was a very important
epistle portraying the movements of the Church since the exodus from
Nauvoo, and declaring the intentions and prospects of the people for the
immediate future. All the members of the Church who had been driven from
their homes were instructed to gather to the site selected for their
settlement in the Great Basin. Others in the United States, Canada and
Great Britain, were likewise counseled to gather, as circumstances would
permit. They were to bring with them seeds of every kind—“everything
that grows upon the face of the whole earth that will please the eye,
gladden the heart, or cheer the soul of man.” They were also to bring “the
best stock of beasts, birds and fowl,” and tools of every kind. Advice in
relation to the building of Zion; the preaching of the Gospel; the duties
of parents; the building of the temple, and other matters of grave concern
to the members of the Church, were also set forth, for their comfort and
guidance, during those days of reconstruction and great trial.
Kanesville—Pottawattamie County
Following the advice of President Young, the Saints
residing at Winter Quarters moved across the Missouri River to the Bluffs
on the Iowa side. This country was called the “Pottawattamie country,”
because it was inhabited by a tribe of Indians by that name. These Indians
had been removed by the government, a few months before, to another part,
leaving the Saints in sole occupancy of the land. There were no
settlements within many miles of the Latter-day Saints. President Young
deemed it wise that the Saints should hold these lands for some time, in
the interests of immigration, and therefore many who were not prepared to
go west, and some who preferred to remain, made this place their home.
The settlement established by them was in what was
called “Miller’s Hollow.” They named it “Kanesville,” in honor of Colonel
Thomas L. Kane, who had been instrumental in securing for them privileges
from the government, and who had shown his friendship on many occasions.
Elder Orson Hyde, who was left in charge after the departure of President
Young and the majority of the Saints, published a paper, the Frontier Guardian, which continued under his editorship
for three years. When the Saints residing there were instructed to join
the main body of the Latter-day Saints in the West, the paper was sold and
the members of the Church left their holdings for other people.
The Iowa Legislature in 1847, provided for the creation
of counties in the Pottawattamie country, whenever the judge of that
district “should decree that the public good required it.” The Saints
petitioned for a county organization, and learned that the judge had
already taken steps in that direction. The County of Pottawattamie was
therefore organized, and was officered by members of the Church. Other
settlers began to arrive, after the Saints had made of the place a
pleasant habitation. When the call came for the members of the Church to
“arise and come home” in 1852, they deserted Kanesville and the name was
soon changed to Council Bluffs, by which name it has since been known.
President Young’s Second Trip Across the Plains
During the month of May, 1848, preparations were made
for the departure of the main body of the Saints on the Missouri River. On
the 9th of that month the first company of twenty-two wagons departed and
camped on the Elkhorn. On the 26th, President Young left Winter Quarters
and took command of the camps and led them across the plains. This was to
be his last trip, for his duties henceforth were to be among the
settlements in the Rocky Mountains. During the month of June Presidents
Young and Kimball commenced their journey at the head of camps consisting
of over six hundred wagons and nearly two thousand souls, with their
accompanying goods and chattels. President Willard Richards followed in
the month of July with another camp of one hundred and sixty-nine wagons
and over five hundred souls. These camps traveled in accordance with the
regulations adopted at the beginning among the pioneers. From this time
forth, for many years, companies of Latter-day Saints might be seen
crossing the plains, coming from Europe and the various states of the
Union. Presidents Young and Kimball arrived in the valley in September,
and President Richards arrived early in October, 1848.
Plague of the Crickets
The season was so far advanced when the pioneers arrived
in the summer of 1847 that little resulted from the planting, except to
obtain some seed potatoes. Their salvation depended on the success of
their crops in 1848. They had built three saw mills in the mountains and
one grist mill. Their planted fields consisted of five thousand one
hundred and thirty-three acres, of which nearly nine hundred acres were
planted in winter wheat. With the aid of irrigation all things looked
favorable, and it appeared that there would be a fruitful harvest. The
Saints were happy and their prospects were bright. They gave thanks to the
Lord and in humility desired to serve him. In the months of May and June
they were menaced by a danger as bad as the persecution of mobs. Myriads
of crickets came down the mountain sides into the valley, like a vast army
marshalled for battle, and began to destroy the fields. From one they
would pass on to another, and in a few moments leave a field as barren as
a desert waste. Something had to be done, or the inhabitants must perish.
The community was aroused and every soul entered the unequal conflict.
Trenches were dug around the fields and filled with water, in the hope of
stopping the ravages of the pest, but without result. Fire was equally
unavailing. The attempt was made to beat them back with clubs, brooms and
other improvised weapons, but nothing that man could do was able to stop
the steady onward march of the voracious crickets. The settlers were
helpless before them.
The Miracle of the Gulls
When all seemed lost, and the Saints were giving up in
despair, the heavens became clouded with gulls, which hovered over the
fields, uttering their plaintive scream. Was this a new evil come upon
them? Such were the thoughts of some who expected that what the crickets
left the gulls would destroy; but not so, the gulls in countless
battalions descended and began to devour the crickets, waging a battle for
the preservation of the crops. They ate, they gorged upon the pest, and
then flying to the streams would drink and vomit and again return to the
battle front. This took place day by day until the crickets were
destroyed. The people gave thanks, for this was to them a miracle. Surely
the Lord was merciful and had sent the gulls as angels of mercy for their
salvation.1 Since that time the gull has been looked
upon by the Latter-day Saints almost as a sacred deliverer. Laws have been
passed for the protection of these birds, and the wanton killing of one
would be considered a crime of great magnitude.
The Feast of the Harvest
The first harvest in the valley was none too plentiful;
however, enough had been raised to tide over the season with the oncoming
and constantly increasing population. It is doubtful if ever since then a
harvest has filled the hearts of the people with such joy and
satisfaction. With thankful hearts, August 10, 1848, a public “harvest
feast” was celebrated in the valley. It had been demonstrated that
abundant crops could be raised with proper care and cultivation. Large
sheaves of wheat, rye, barley, and other products of the soil, were placed
on exhibition, and the people celebrated with music, song, speeches,
prayer and thanksgiving.
The Return of Oliver Cowdery
For some time the Spirit of the Lord had been striving
with Oliver Cowdery. Finally he decided to accept the admonition of the
apostles given November 22, 1847, and again unite with the Church. He came
to Kanesville with his family, in October, 1848, and asked to be received
as a member in the Church. He had been absent for over ten years. A
special conference was held October 21, 1848, at which Oliver Cowdery
arose and confessed the error of his ways and gave his testimony as
follows:
“Friends and Brethren: My name is Cowdery, Oliver
Cowdery. In the early history of this Church I stood identified with
her, and one in her councils. True it is that the gifts and callings of
God are without repentance; not because I was better than the rest of
mankind was I called; but, to fulfil the purposes of God, he called me
to a high and holy calling.“I wrote with my own pen the entire Book of Mormon
(save a few pages), as it fell from the lips of the Prophet Joseph
Smith, as he translated it by the gift and power of God, by the means of
the Urim and Thummim, or, as it is called by that book, ‘holy
interpreters.’ I beheld with my eyes, and handled with my hands, the
gold plates from which it was transcribed. I also saw with my eyes and
handled with my hands the ‘holy interpreters.’ That book is true. Sidney
Rigdon did not write it. Mr. Spaulding did not write it. I wrote it
myself as it fell from the lips of the Prophet. It contains the
everlasting Gospel, and came forth to the children of men in fulfilment
of the revelations of John, where he says he saw an angel come with the
everlasting Gospel to preach to every nation, kindred, tongue and
people. It contains principles of salvation; and if you, my hearers,
will walk by its light and obey its precepts, you will be saved with an
everlasting salvation in the kingdom of God on high. Brother Hyde has
just said that it is very important that we keep and walk in the true
channel, in order to avoid the sand-bars. This is true. The channel is
here. The Holy Priesthood is here.“I was present with Joseph when an holy angel from God
came down from heaven and conferred on us, or restored the lesser or
Aaronic Priesthood, and said to us at the same time, that it should
remain upon the earth while the earth stands.“I was also present with Joseph when the higher or
Melchizedek Priesthood was conferred by holy angels from on high. This
Priesthood we then conferred on each other, by the will and commandment
of God. This Priesthood, as was then declared, is also to remain upon
the earth until the last remnant of time. This Holy Priesthood, or
authority, we then conferred upon many, and is just as good and valid as
though God had done it in person.“I laid my hands upon that man—yes, I laid my
right hand upon his head (pointing to Brother Hyde), and I conferred
upon him the Priesthood, and he holds that Priesthood now. He was also
called through me, by the prayer of faith, an apostle of the Lord Jesus
Christ.”
A few days later Oliver Cowdery appeared before the high
council at Kanesville and requested that he be received into the Church.
His case was considered and on motion of Elder Orson Hyde, who presided at
Kanesville, he was received by baptism. When Oliver appeared before the
high council on this occasion he said:
“Brethren, for a number of years I have been separated
from you. I now desire to come back. I wish to come humbly and to be one
in your midst, I seek no station. I only wish to be identified with you.
I am out of the Church. I am not a member of the Church, but I wish to
become a member of it. I wish to come in at the door. I know the door. I
have not come here to seek precedence, I come humbly, and throw myself
upon the decisions of this body, knowing, as I do, that its decisions
are right, and should be obeyed.”
It was a sad occasion, yet a time of rejoicing to see
the former “Second Elder” of the Church with a contrite spirit desiring
fellowship in the Church, and the association of his former brethren.
After his baptism he desired to go to the Salt Lake Valley and then take a
mission to Great Britain. Before doing so he went to visit with relatives
in Missouri, and while there he was taken sick and died March 3, 1850. He
died a happy man with the assurance that his sins had been forgiven him.
The Beginning of New Settlements
Explorations of the surrounding valleys commenced as
soon as the pioneers entered the Salt Lake Valley, for the purpose of
discovering suitable sites for other gathering places. In the fall of
1847, Perrigrine Sessions, Samuel Brown and Hector C. Haight moved into
the valley north (Davis County) with herds of cattle. Sessions camped near
the spot where Bountiful was subsequently built, and there he lived during
the winter with part of his family, first in a wagon and then in a hut.
Later he built a permanent home which was the beginning of Bountiful,
formerly called Session’s Settlement. Hector C. Haight went a few miles
farther north and made his camp near the present site of Farmington, on
Big Creek. Later he moved about three miles north on Haight’s Creek, where
he built a cabin where he lived with one of his sons during the winter of
1847–48. In 1848, Daniel Miller, Thomas Grover, Jacob F. Secrist,
William Smith and many others moved to the north and became the first
settlers of Bountiful, Farmington and other towns in Davis County. Early
in the year 1848, Captain James Brown, who had returned from California,
entered into negotiations with Miles M. Goodyear, a trapper and trader,
for the purchase of lands where the present city of Ogden is built. There
he located, calling the place Brownsville. John S. Higbee and others
located in Utah valley in 1849. That same year John Rowberry led a company
to Tooele Valley, and Isaac Morley another to Sanpete Valley. In all these
places permanent settlements were established in that year. From this time
on colonization continued, under the direction of President Brigham Young,
and settlements began to spring up throughout the Rocky Mountains,
extending for hundreds of miles. The prophecy of Joseph Smith uttered
August 6, 1842, was realized.
Filling Vacancies in the Council of the Twelve
The organization of the First Presidency and the
disfellowshipment of Lyman Wight, left four vacancies in the council of
the twelve. February 11, 1849, the First Presidency and apostles met in
council at the homes of Elder George B. Wallace to consider the filling of
these vacancies. President Young nominated Elders Charles C. Rich, Lorenzo
Snow, Erastus Snow and Franklin D. Richards for these positions, which
nominations were approved by the apostles. The following day at the home
of Elder Wallace, they were ordained.
The Salt Lake Stake
In the fall of 1847, the Saints in the Salt Lake Valley
were organized into a stake. It became necessary in 1849, to perfect that
organization and make certain changes. A meeting was called, February 13,
1849, for that purpose. Elder Daniel Spencer was set apart as president of
the Salt Lake Stake, succeeding Patriarch John Smith, with David Fullmer
and Willard Snow as his counselors. A committee was appointed to lay the
city off into ecclesiastical wards, which later reported, and at another
meeting held on the 16th, the high council was organized and officers
chosen for quorums of the Priesthood. The following division of the valley
into wards was decided on: “South of the city and east of the Jordan
River, into four wards: Canyon Creek (Sugar House) Ward, embracing the
five-acre survey and all east of it; Mill Creek Ward, embracing the
ten-acre survey and all east of it; a third ward, embracing the country
between the ten-acre survey and the Cottonwood Creek; and a fourth,
embracing all south of the Cottonwood. West of the Jordan: Canaan Ward;
north of the city and east of the Jordan and the lake, three wards.” These
wards included the settlements as far north as Brownsville (Ogden). At
another meeting held on the 22nd of the month the city was divided into
nineteen wards of nine blocks each.
The Perpetual Emigration Fund
Business of great importance was considered at the
October general conference of the Church in 1849. It was decided that the
Church should establish a “Perpetual Emigrating Fund Company,” for the
gathering of the poor from the nations of the earth. The company was duly
incorporated and committees were appointed for the purpose of gathering
means for this fund, which were used in bringing great numbers of the
Latter-day Saints to the valleys of the mountains. This continued for many
years. Finally, in 1887, the Perpetual Emigrating Fund Company was
disincorporated by the passage of the Edmunds-Tucker bill, and the funds
escheated to the government for the benefit of the common schools of Utah.
It was intended that those who were aided by this fund should pay back
into it the means advanced for their transportation to the West, that
others might be helped also to emigrate. In this way it would be a
perpetual and self-sustaining fund. Five thousand dollars was the sum of
the original contributions, and by its aid as many as five hundred wagons
were furnished some seasons to help the Saints across the plains.
Increased Missionary Activity
At this same conference missionaries were called to go
to various parts of the earth as follows: Elder Charles C. Rich, to
Southern California (San Bernardino) to assist Amasa M. Lyman and to
succeed him in that field of labor; Addison Pratt, James Brown and Hyrum
H. Blackwell, to the Society Islands; Lorenzo Snow and Joseph Toronto, to
Italy; Erastus Snow and Peter O. Hansen, to Denmark; John Taylor, Curtis
E. Bolton and John Pack, to France; Franklin D. Richards, Joseph W.
Johnson, Joseph W. Young, Job Smith, Haden Church, George B. Wallace, John
S. Higbee and Jacob Gates, to England; and John E. Forsgren, to Sweden.
This was a wonderful undertaking and a remarkable trial of faith, in the
days of the poverty and adversity of the people, when the help of all was
needed to build up settlements and contend with the trials and hardships
of pioneer life in this western country. In the evening of the 6th of
October, the presidency set apart the brethren of the apostles for their
fields of labor, and the apostles set apart the elders who were also
called to various mission fields. In a very short time all were on their
way to carry the message of salvation to the world, a duty the Lord has
placed upon the elders of the Church, which is second to no other. The
inspiration of these calls is seen in the fruitful harvest of souls which
was gathered in England, Scandinavia and other lands.
An Unexpected Harvest
The harvest of 1848 was hardly adequate for the needs of
the Saints, for their numbers had been greatly increased by immigration.
The people therefore were under the necessity of conserving to make ends
meet. They were placed on rations and were forced also to resort to the
digging of sego roots, and making greens from thistles and weeds to eke
out an existence. Their clothing was scant, and most of the men dressed in
buckskins, and all materials were made to do extra service. During these
stringent times, President Heber C. Kimball delivered a discourse in which
he uttered a remarkable prophecy. He said that within a short time “states
goods” would be sold in Salt Lake City cheaper than they could be
purchased in St. Louis or New York, and that the people would be supplied
with both food and clothing. Few, if any, who heard these remarks,
believed him. Such a thing in the far west, over a thousand miles from the
nearest settlements, where all goods had to be freighted by team, seemed
an impossibility. Yet the prophecy was literally fulfilled.
In the summer of 1849, gold seekers on their way to
California, commenced arriving in the Salt Lake Valley. Their animals were
worn out by the long and strenuous journey, for in their haste for gold,
these travelers had sacrificed all things, that they might make haste to
their destination. Now they were anxious to obtain fresh animals for their
tired ones, that they might hurry on their journey. To do this they were
willing to dispose of their goods at a great sacrifice. They lightened
their loads in the interest of speed and disposed of their provisions,
clothing and other materials, at a price below the cost of the articles in
the states at the time they started on their westward journey.
Notes
September 13, 1913, a monument commemorating this event, was unveiled
on the Temple Block, Salt Lake City. The “Seagull Monument,” as it is
called, is the work of Mahonri M. Young, grandson of President Brigham
Young.
Chapter 42
A Provisional Government
When the first settlers arrived in the Salt Lake Valley,
they were directed exclusively by Church authority. However, the people
realized that civil government must be inaugurated in their several
settlements after they were founded. As early as the fall of 1847 some
municipal officers were appointed, although no city government was
effected at that time. Before leaving Nauvoo, the authorities of the
Church had expressed the desire of organizing a civil government under the
flag of the United States. While on the plains they wrote to President
James K. Polk, under date of August 6, 1846, and “resolved” that as soon
as they were settled in the Great Basin they would petition the United
States for a territorial government, “bounded on the north by the British,
and south by the Mexican dominions, and east and west by the summits of
the Rocky and Cascade Mountains.”
The First Political Convention
In February 1849, a call was issued for a political
convention. The people residing within the territory bounded by the Rocky
Mountains, the Republic of Mexico, the Sierra Nevada Mountains and the
Territory of Oregon, were invited to assemble at Great Salt Lake City,
March 5, 1849. On that date a convention was held, and Congress was
petitioned to organize the Territory of Deseret.1 A constitution
was adopted and a provisional government was set up.
The Territory of Utah
Other petitions were also sent to Washington, asking for
statehood, but the government was not willing to grant all that the
inhabitants of the Great Basin desired. Enemies and bitter apostates lent
their aid to defeat the project. In September 1850, Congress passed a bill
for the organization of the territory of Utah, which was approved by the
President. The people preferred the name “Deseret,”2 but gladly
accepted what was offered them.
Territorial Officers Appointed
In September 1850, President Millard Fillmore appointed
the federal officers for the territory of Utah. Brigham Young was
appointed governor, a position he had held in the “Provisional State of
Deseret.” Broughton D. Harris, of Vermont, was appointed secretary; Joseph
Buffington, of Pennsylvania, chief justice; Perry C. Brocchus, of Alabama,
and Zerubbabel Snow of Ohio—the latter a member of the Church—
associate justices; Seth M. Blair, attorney; and Joseph L. Heywood, United
States marshal. The two latter were residents of Utah. Judge Buffington
declined and Lemuel C. Brandebury, of Pennsylvania, was appointed in his
stead. In addition to these officers there were three Indian agents. Four
of these federal officers were members of the Church. The appointment of
President Young as governor, was due to the influence of Colonel Thomas L.
Kane, the staunch and faithful friend of the Latter-day Saints.
The “Run-Away Officials”
Three of these officials came to Utah filled with
prejudice, and one, at least (Judge Brocchus), hoped that he might be
elected to office and represent the territory in Congress. He had no
desire to stay in the West. Together with Chief Justice Brandebury and
Secretary Harris, he determined to leave again for the East, and
preparations were made toward that end. These men complained of the
smallness of their salaries, and Governor Young and other citizens
petitioned Washington in their behalf. Harris declared “that he had
private instructions designed for no eye but his own, to watch every
movement and not pay out any funds unless the same should be strictly
legal, and according to his own judgment.” When he decided to return to
the East he also determined to take with him the funds which he had
brought for territorial purposes. An attempt was made to prevent this
action by legislative enactment, but he was sustained by the two judges,
and carried the funds back to St. Louis, where he deposited them with the
assistant treasurer of the United States. It was in September, 1851, when
these officials left the territory.
Their Report to Washington
The three run-away officials reported in Washington that
they were compelled to leave Utah on account of the lawless acts and
seditious tendencies of Brigham Young and the majority of the residents.
3
They accused Governor Young with a waste of public funds—
which they had refused to let him have—and referred to the existence
of “polygamy” among the “Mormons.”
Governor Young’s Defense
Anticipating the accusations of these officials, because
of threats made before their departure, Governor Young wrote to President
Fillmore, September 29, 1851, setting forth his own course and the true
condition in the territory. This letter was augmented by others from
Jedediah M. Grant, mayor of Salt Lake City, who was then in the East, and
Col. Thomas L. Kane.4 Daniel Webster, secretary of state, ordered
these officials to return to their posts or resign; so resign they did.
Their Places Filled
The places of these men were later filled. Lazarus H.
Reed, of New York, was appointed chief justice for Utah; Leonidas Shaver,
associate justice, and Benjamin G. Ferris, secretary. Secretary Ferris did
not remain in the territory very long, but the two justices were respected
by the people who held them in high esteem.
The Deseret Evening News
In each of the settlements of the Latter-day Saints,
before coming to Utah, they had endeavored to publish magazines and
periodicals for the benefit of the Saints. In keeping with this custom a
small wrought-iron Ramage handpress, was purchased in Philadelphia and
brought across the plains by one of the early companies. In 1850, this
press was put to use, and the first newspaper published in the Rocky
Mountains made its appearance in Salt Lake City. This was the Deseret News, the first number of which was published June
15, 1850, with President Willard Richards as editor. It was a small
quarto, issued weekly, and has since grown into one of the influential
daily papers in the inter-mountain country.
Announcement of the Plural Marriage Doctrine
August 28 and 29, 1852, a special conference was held in
Salt Lake City. One hundred and six elders were called to go on missions
to various fields, including the countries of Europe, Russia, India,
China, South Africa, Australia, Hawaii, and other islands of the sea, as
well as the states of the Union. On the second day the first public
announcement of the doctrine of plural marriage was declared. The
revelation given to the Prophet Joseph Smith, dealing with the new and
everlasting covenant and including the doctrine of marriage for eternity
and “plural wives,” was read. Elder Orson Pratt delivered the first public
discourse on this principle, dealing with the subject from a scriptural
standpoint. He emphasized the fact that the practice of plural marriage
among the Latter-day Saints was not to “gratify the carnal lusts and
feelings of man,” but was to be practiced in all holiness. Moreover, that
there was but one who held the keys of this power, and there were “bounds
and restrictions” which the Lord had set, and all who obeyed this law
should be in harmony with the law, receiving the sanction of the one who
held the keys. Following the discourse of Elder Orson Pratt, President
Brigham Young made some remarks dealing with the history of the revelation.
Laying the Corner Stones of the Salt Lake Temple
In February, 1853, ground was broken for the foundation
of the Salt Lake Temple. Wednesday, April 6, the corner stones were laid
with solemn and impressive ceremonies. This was the beginning of the most
costly and imposing temple yet to be erected by the Church, and was to
take forty years in the building. Other temples had been built, but the
Saints had not been granted the privilege of enjoying blessings in them
for any length of time. In this far western country, they hoped to build
undisturbed, and have the opportunity of receiving their own blessings
therein and also labor for their dead. It was at first proposed to build
the temple of sandstone from Red Butte Canyon, and a wooden track was laid
from the city to the canyon for the purpose of hauling the rock. It was
finally decided to build of granite, which was found in abundance in
Little Cottonwood Canyon, some eighteen or twenty miles south-east of the
city.
A Solemn Assembly
On the morning of April 6, 1853, thousands of Latter-day
Saints assembled in conference. President Young made a few introductory
remarks saying that in a few years “we may have a place sufficiently large
to accommodate the Saints, although, twenty-three years ago, the Church
was organized with only six members.” The choir sang and prayer was
offered by Elder John Taylor. The procession then formed and moved to the
foundation of the temple. The general authorities of the Church and the
authorities of the Salt Lake Stake, took their places around the
foundation and the ceremonies of laying the corner stones proceeded.
Dedication of the Corner Stones
The First Presidency, with John Smith the patriarch laid
the first or south-east corner stone, according to the pattern given by
the Prophet Joseph Smith. Following this ceremony President Young
delivered an oration, and near the close he said:
“We dedicate the south-east corner stone of the temple
to the Most High God. May it remain in peace till it has done its work,
and until He who has inspired our hearts to fulfil the prophecies of his
holy prophets, that the house of the Lord should be reared in the ‘tops
of the mountains’ shall be satisfied, and say it is enough.”
President Kimball then offered the prayer of dedication,
and the assembly gathered at the south-west corner stone, which was laid
by the Presiding Bishopric, followed by an oration by Bishop Edward
Hunter, and a prayer of dedication by Bishop Alfred Cordon. The north-west
corner stone was laid by the presidency of the high priests, and President
John Young of that quorum, delivered the oration. Elder George B. Wallace
offered the prayer of dedication. The last, or north-east corner stone,
was laid by the council of the twelve. Elder Parley P. Pratt delivered an
oration and the prayer of dedication was offered by Elder Orson Hyde.
After benedictory remarks by President Young, the
procession returned to the Tabernacle and were dismissed.
President Young’s Vision
In the afternoon service of that day, President Young
spoke at length in relation to temple building. In the course of his
remarks he said:
“I scarcely ever say much about revelations, or
visions, but suffice it to say, five years ago last July [1847], I was
here and saw in the spirit the temple not ten feet from where we have
laid the chief corner stone. I have not inquired what kind of a temple
we should build. Why? Because it was represented before me. I never
looked upon that ground, but the vision of it was there. I see it as
plainly as if it was in reality before me. Wait until it is done. I will
say, however, that it will have six towers, to begin with, instead of
one. Now do not any of you apostatize because it will have six towers,
and Joseph only built one. It is easier for us to build sixteen, than it
was for him to build one. The time will come when there will be one in
the center of temples we shall build, and on the top, groves and fish
ponds.”5
Success in Foreign Mission Fields
The missionaries sent out to various parts of the earth
in 1849 and succeeding years, met with varied success. The Church
membership in the British Mission, before heavy emigration set in, was
about twenty-eight thousand souls. Outside of Great Britain perhaps the
greatest success in any foreign field fell to the lot of Erastus Snow and
his companions, who introduced the Gospel in Scandinavia. Many branches
were raised up, especially in Denmark, where Elders Snow, Peter O. Hansen,
George P. Dykes and John E. Forsgren were laboring. Elder Forsgren carried
the Gospel into Sweden and, later (1851) Hans F. Petersen and Hans Peter
Jensen, to Norway. In each of these countries the elders were successful,
although little headway was made in Sweden until 1853, Elder Forsgren
having been banished soon after his arrival there. In Denmark, persecution
raged, and several of the elders were brutally treated, while in Norway
they were cast into prison. Elders John Taylor and companions in France
were able to make some converts, but found it to be a hard field. Elders
Lorenzo Snow, Joseph Toronto and Thomas B. H. Stenhouse, in Italy,
found conditions similar to those the elders encountered in France.
Meeting with no success in Genoa, they moved to the Protestant valleys of
Piedmont, where a few were baptized. Finally Elder Stenhouse was sent into
Switzerland to open the door for the Gospel there, where many were waiting
to embrace the truth. The elders in India made a number of converts, but
principally among the English, and branches of the Church were organized
in that land. The message of salvation was also successfully carried into
Australia, by John Murdock and Charles W. Wandell; into South Africa, by
Elders Jesse Haven, Leonard I. Smith and William Walker; Hawaii, by Elder
George Q. Cannon and companions. In China the mission opened by Elders
Hosea Stout, James Lewis and Chapman Duncan, was a failure, and Elders
Parley P. Pratt and Rufus Allen returned from South America, they being
unable, because of political disturbances, to get a foothold there. Elders
Addison Pratt, Benjamin F. Grouard, James Brown and others, were banished
from the Society Islands, and the native Saints were sentenced to hard
labor for holding meetings. Elders Pratt and Grouard, with Noah Rodgers,
who died crossing the plains in 1846, had successfully introduced the
Gospel in those and other islands of the Pacific in the day of the Prophet
Joseph Smith.
The Foundation for Future Labors
These early missionaries laid the foundation for the
preaching of the Gospel in many foreign lands, which has been continued
since that time with wonderful results. Thousands of honest converts have
gladly received the message of salvation, and with the spirit of gathering
resting upon them, have come to Zion, as the prophets foretold, with songs
of everlasting joy.
The Hand-Cart Immigration
The early companies arriving in the Salt Lake Valley
came with oxen, mules and horses and heavy laden wagons. The people,
however, quite generally were under the necessity of walking across the
plains by the sides of their wagons. It became apparent that other and
cheaper methods would have to be employed to accommodate the increasing
immigration. As early as 1851, the First Presidency suggested the use of
handcarts as a means of making the journey from Iowa westward. In fact,
there were in the Salt Lake Valley at that time some who had crossed the
plains in that manner, with comparative comfort and safety, and this had
led to the suggestion of general travel in hand-cart companies. It was not
until about the year 1856, however, that the idea was impressed upon the
foreign Saints, and then after repeated suggestions. When they did take
hold of it they entered into the spirit of hand-cart transportation with
enthusiasm. Especially was this the case with the members of the Church in
the British Isles. With handcarts, the British Saints could make the
journey from Liverpool to Salt Lake City for about forty-five dollars,
coming by way of Boston or New York to Iowa City, where they were fitted
out to cross the plains. To those who were scarcely able to raise means,
or who did not care to be indebted to the Perpetual Emigration Fund
Company, this was a decided advantage.
The First Hand-Cart Companies
The first hand-cart companies to cross the plains were
led by Edmund Ellsworth and Daniel D. McArthur. Ellsworth’s company,
numbering 266 souls, left Iowa City, June 9, 1856. McArthur followed two
days later with a company of 220. A third and smaller company of Welsh
Saints, under command of Edward Bunker, left on the 23rd. The members of
these three companies pushed their hand-carts containing all their worldly
possessions, over the plains, the mountains, and through rivers and
streams, a distance of about thirteen hundred miles. A few deaths among
the aged and infirm occurred on the way, but these companies all arrived
in Salt Lake City in good condition and happy to be in Zion. The companies
of Ellsworth and McArthur arrived on the 26th of September, having been
delayed by the breaking down of hand-carts which were built of unseasoned
timber, and therefore could not stand the strain and the excessive heat of
the summer sun. They were met and welcomed by the First Presidency and a
large concourse of citizens, with a brass band, at the foot of Little
Mountain, in Emigration Canyon, and were escorted into the city where they
received a royal welcome. These two companies arrived with ninety-six
hand-carts, five wagons, twenty-four oxen, four mules, and twenty-five
tents. October 2, Captain Edward Bunker’s company arrived without having
had serious loss, and were also met with enthusiastic welcome.
The Willie and Martin Companies
Two other companies with hand-carts were fitted out in
the summer of 1856. The members of these companies were mainly from Great
Britain and Scandinavia. They arrived in Iowa City, the starting point,
near the end of June and in the fore part of July, where they discovered
that the tents and hand-carts for their use, were not provided.
Consequently they were delayed until these necessary articles could be
manufactured, or purchased. The delay was dangerous, for the season was
advancing, and the journey across the plains should not have been
undertaken as late as the middle of July, when the first company was
prepared to start. This company under the command of James G. Willie, left
Iowa City, July 15, and Florence [Winter Quarters], Nebraska, on the 19th
of August. They were followed by the second belated company, the fifth of
the season, under the command of Edward Martin, about two weeks later.
The Question of Traveling Considered
While at Florence, the question whether they should
pursue their journey from that point, or go into winter quarters, was
discussed. The majority were in favor of continuing on the way, although
there were dissenting voices, because of the lateness of the season and
the dangers the journey entailed.6 Nevertheless the
decision was reached and they determined to go on rather than remain on
the plains through the winter. They fully hoped to reach Salt Lake City
before the chilling blasts of winter should overtake them. This was a
fatal error, but one, of course, unexpected by most of the companies, for
the winter season set in much earlier than usual that year, and was most
severe.
The Babbitt and Margetts Tragedies
The fore part of this hand-cart journey passed
pleasantly enough for such a trip, except for the breaking down of carts
and feelings of anxiety because of Indian raids. The Cheyennes were on the
warpath and had made attacks on a number of preceding immigration trains.
In September, while the handcart companies were on the Platte, Almon W.
Babbitt, secretary of Utah, and a number of his camp who were in advance
were killed. They were on their way to Utah from Washington, with a train
of government property. A short time later Thomas Margetts and wife; James
Cody, wife and child, who were on their way to England, were killed by the
marauding Indians. News of these massacres did not tend to lighten the
hearts of the hand-cart immigrants, but it did serve to make them more
vigilant. Even then, they were deprived of many of their cattle, which
were stolen by the red men.
Disasters on the Way
Notwithstanding all the difficulties and dangers in
their path, these two companies pressed on with all possible speed. In the
fore part of their journey, they made favorable daily progress, but as
they continued, and the roads became more rough and repairs were
constantly necessary, their progress was delayed. Due to the lightness of
their hand-carts and the hasty manner in which they were constructed of
unseasoned wood, they began to fall to pieces before the companies were
well on the journey, and to repair them required time.
While they were on the Platte, in the middle of
September, the first frosts of the season were encountered, which
increased in severity day by day. September 30, Captain Willie’s company
arrived at Fort Laramie—five hundred miles east of their destination
—and the next day continued on their way. From this point on they
encountered the hardest part of their travel, and winter was fast
approaching. Their rations were growing less, and restrictions were placed
upon them. What was worse, due to the loss of conveyances and the heavy
grades they had to climb when they reached the mountains, they had to
discard a portion of their burdens. Articles of clothing and bedding had
to be left on the way, that progress might be made. Improperly clad and
with poor shelter, they were exposed to the piercing winds and bitter cold
of the early winter storms. This caused them severe suffering, and many of
the more delicate were placed in untimely graves along the way, without
proper ceremony and in compelling haste. Under such adverse conditions
they were forced to push on, and wait not for anything, for emergency
demanded haste, lest the grim and merciless winter embrace them in the
grasp of death.
The sufferings of the advance company were repeated, but
with greater severity, by the one which traveled in the rear. The Martin
camp was composed of a larger number of women and children, and the
inclement season, augmented by the many other difficulties encountered,
caused greater loss of life in their ranks.
Extreme Suffering on the Sweetwater
On the Sweetwater, these immigrants encountered extreme
winter weather and heavy snows. Death had occurred frequently during these
stages of the journey. After one of these severe storms fifteen members of
the camp died in one day, while others were severely injured.
A Party to the Rescue
Through reports from returning missionaries who passed
these hand-cart companies on the way, President Brigham Young learned that
they were on the plains. Fearing for their safety, he organized relief
parties and sent them out with provisions, clothing and bedding to help
them to reach the valley. An advance guard of two young men, Joseph A.
Young and Stephen Taylor, was sent in a light wagon to inform the weary
and stricken travelers that relief was on the way. As these young men
approached the hand-cart company led by Captain Willie, they appeared as
angels of mercy. “More welcome messengers never came from the courts of
glory,” said John Chislett, “than these two young men were to us. They
lost no time, after encouraging us all they could to press forward, but
sped on further to convey their glad news to Edward Martin and the fifth
hand-cart company, who had left Florence about two weeks after us, and who
it was feared, were even worse off than we were. As they went from our
view, many a hearty ‘God bless you,’ followed them.”
“Martin’s Ravine”
As the rescuers pressed on their way they discovered the
Martin company in a ravine, between the Platte and the Sweetwater. The
place has been designated “Martin’s Ravine,” and here the sufferers had
made their camp. They had about given up all hope and were ready to
succumb to the rigorous and persecuting winter, when word was received
that relief was coming. The joy that filled the hearts of the survivors
—for death had charged such heavy toll that the ravine was like an
overcrowded tomb—is beyond the power of mortal pen to write.
The Arrival in the Valley
With the help of the brethren, and the supplies from the
valley, the survivors of these two belated trains arrived in Salt Lake
City in November. Captain Willie’s company entered the city on the 9th,
and Captain Martin’s three weeks later. Out of Captain Willie’s company of
between four and five hundred souls, seventy-seven had perished. Of the
Martin company about one-fourth of the five hundred and seventy-six who
started found graves along the way.
Later Hand-Cart Immigration
Other companies with hand-carts crossed the plains in
subsequent years. And from the Salt Lake Valley missionaries employed
hand-carts to help them to their distant fields of labor. Never again,
however, was a condition permitted to arise such as that which overtook
the companies under Captains Willie and Martin in the fall of 1856.
The Passing of Prominent Men
During the period covered in this chapter, several
prominent elders of the Church passed away. Oliver Cowdery, who at the
incipiency of the work, stood with the Prophet Joseph Smith as the second
elder of the Church, and who, with the Prophet, held the keys of this
dispensation, as they were received from holy angels, passed away. He died
March 3, 1850, at Richmond, Missouri. Only a few months before his death
[See Chap. 41] he returned to the Church after an alienation of several
years. Presiding Bishop Newel K. Whitney, who was also among the first to
embrace the Gospel, died in Salt Lake City, October 13, 1850. He joined
the Church in Kirtland in 1831, and passed through the trying scenes of
Ohio, Missouri and Illinois. He was ordained to be the second bishop of
the Church, and after the death of Edward Partridge, was sustained as the
presiding bishop. In 1848 he led a company of immigrants to the Salt Lake
Valley. Two of his sons, Horace K. and Orson K., were members of the
pioneer band, but their father remained at Winter Quarters, where his
services were required during those trying times. He was succeeded as
presiding bishop by Edward Hunter in 1851.
March 11, 1854, Willard Richards, second counselor to
President Brigham Young, died in Salt Lake City. He was born in
Massachusetts, in 1804, and was baptized by Brigham Young, December 31,
1836. The following year he accompanied Elder Heber C. Kimball and others
to England and assisted in the opening of that mission. After his
companions returned, he remained as one of the presidency of the British
Mission, in which capacity he was laboring when the apostles went to that
land. Having been called to the apostleship, he was ordained in Preston,
England, by President Brigham Young and other members of the council of
the apostles, April 14, 1840. He returned to the United States in 1841,
and became the private secretary to the Prophet Joseph Smith, and was with
him in Carthage prison at the time of the martyrdom. From 1842 until his
death he was Church historian and recorder and at the reorganization of
the First Presidency, was selected by President Young as his second
counselor. In this position he was succeeded by Elder Jedediah M. Grant,
and as historian, by Elder George A. Smith.
“Uncle” John Smith, the presiding patriarch of the
Church, died in Salt Lake City, May 23, 1854. He was a man of tried
integrity and had served in the councils of the Church from the time of
his baptism until his death. He was among the first of the Prophet’s
relatives to receive the truth and through his influence others were
converted. He was succeeded in the office of patriarch, by John Smith,
eldest son of the Patriarch Hyrum Smith.
Elder Orson Spencer, a man of superior education, who
served the Church faithfully and well as a missionary for many years, was
called to the other side of the veil, October 15, 1855, while at St.
Louis. He had presided in the British Mission during one of the critical
periods in that land.
Jedediah M. Grant, second counselor to President Brigham
Young, died in Salt Lake City, December 1, 1856, after a brief illness. He
was a young man of forceful character and had been identified with the
Church since 1833. He was a member of Zion’s Camp in 1834; was chosen
among the first seventies, and in that calling filled a number of
successful missions throughout the United States. He passed through the
persecutions of Missouri and Illinois, and arrived in the Salt Lake
Valley, in charge of the last company to cross the plains in 1847. He was
the first mayor of Salt Lake City, and when he was called to be a
counselor to President Young, was serving as one of the first council of
the seventies. He was succeeded as a counselor in the First Presidency by
Elder Daniel H. Wells.
The Assassination of Parley P. Pratt
Another death, occurring May 13, 1857, was that of Elder
Parley P. Pratt of the council of the twelve. In the autumn of 1856, Elder
Pratt left Salt Lake City with a company of missionaries, and crossed the
plains. That winter he labored in St. Louis, Philadelphia, New York and
other cities in the East. In the spring of 1857, he was in Arkansas. While
there he attempted to assist a Mrs. Hector H. McLean, who was a member of
the Church, to obtain possession of her children, she having separated
from her husband because of drunkenness and cruelty. McLean accused Elder
Pratt of alienating the affections of his wife and attempting to abduct
the children. A trial was held, and Elder Pratt was acquitted of the
charge. Shortly afterwards, as he was journeying from Van Buren County
where the court was held, intending to join an immigrant company for Utah,
he was overtaken by McLean who plunged a bowie knife in his side. After
Elder Pratt had fallen from his horse, McLean shot him with a pistol. The
assassin was never punished for the foul deed. In this manner died one of
the greatest expounders of the latter-day faith, a poet and writer, whose
works survive and have done much to bring many to a knowledge of the
Gospel. Although their author’s voice has long been stilled, his work yet
speaks with convincing power.
Notes
Col. Thomas L. Kane advised the Saints to petition for statehood,
rather than for a territorial form of government, pointing out that they
would be permitted to govern themselves in a state government, but in a
territory they would likely be subject to outside politicians, who would
not be in sympathy with them, and perhaps their enemies. The people took
his advice, but were not successful in obtaining their desire. Even under
territorial regulations they should have been granted self government,
through the appointment of officials from their own communities, but this
proved to be the exception during the long history of Utah as a territory.
And with a few honorable exceptions, the officers sent to them from other
parts, were broken down politicians and men to whom political office was
tendered as a debt for party service. Many of them were extremely bitter
against the Saints, and resorted to falsehood and misrepresentation, in
order to bring the majority of the inhabitants of the territory into
disrepute at Washington and throughout the nation. Under such conditions
conflict was constant and inevitable.
Deseret is a Book of Mormon term meaning “honey bee.”
These “lawless acts and seditious tendencies,” evidently had
reference to certain remarks made by President Brigham Young, in a
discourse in which he said the United States looked on scenes of mobbing,
driving, and murdering of Latter-day Saints in Missouri and Illinois,
without interference, or taking steps to correct the evil, but by silence
gave sanction to such proceedings. Moreover for a rebuke administered to
Judge Brocchus, who at a special conference of the Church in September,
1851, was privileged to speak and accused the leaders of the Church of
disloyalty, and reflected upon the virtue of the women of the Latter-day
Saints.
4. Following is a letter from Col. Thomas L. Kane
to President Fillmore in defense of Governor Brigham Young:
Philadelphia, July 11, 1851.
My Dear
Sir: I have no wish to evade the responsibility of having vouched for
the character of Mr. Brigham Young, of Utah, and his fitness for the
station he now occupies. I reiterate without reserve, the statement of his
excellent capacity, energy, and integrity, which I made you prior to his
appointment. I am willing to say I volunteered to communicate to you facts
by which I was convinced of his patriotism, and devotion to the interest
of the Union. I made no qualification when I assured you of his
irreproachable moral character, because I was able to speak of this from
my own intimate, personal knowledge.
If any shadow of evidence
can be adduced in support of the charges of your anonymous assailant, the
next mail from Utah shall bring you their complete and circumstantial
refutation. Meanwhile I am ready to offer this assurance for publication
in any form you care to indicate, and challenge contradiction from any
respectable authority.
I am, Sir, with high
respect and esteem, your most obedient servant,
Thomas L. Kane.
The President.
Millennial Star 15:488.
6. While the consideration of this momentous
question was being discussed the brethren were advised by Elder Levi
Savage, who was returning from a mission to Siam and Ceylon, that such a
journey so late in the season should not be undertaken, and it would be
better to go into winter quarters and wait until spring. He had been over
the route and knew the dangers they would likely encounter, but he was
overruled. According to the narrative of this fatal journey given by John
Chislett, when Elder Savage was overruled he said: “What I have said I
know to be true; but seeing you are to go forward, I will go with you;
will help all I can; will work with you, will rest with you, will suffer
with you, and if necessary, will die with you. May God in his mercy bless
and preserve us.” These were noble sentiments worthy of a place in the
archives of time.
For a descriptive and comparatively full account of
these journeyings of the two belated pioneer companies of hand-carts, the
reader is referred to the History of Utah, by
Orson F. Whitney, vol. 1:547.
Chapter 43
Political Changes
Chief Justice Lazarus H. Reed, after a short stay in
Utah, resigned because of ill-health, and returned to the East where he
died in the spring of 1855. He was succeeded as chief justice by John F.
Kinney, of Iowa, in 1854. After the close of the term of Judge Zerubbabel
Snow, William W. Drummond, of Illinois, was appointed associate justice.
Judge Leonidas Shaver died suddenly in Salt Lake City in June, 1855, due
to an abscess on the brain, and he was succeeded by George P. Stiles.
Character of the Federal Judges
Chief Justice Kinney was a gentleman, and performed his
duty faithfully without partiality. The appointment of the two associate
justices was a calamity. Drummond was dishonest and licentious. He left
his wife and family in Illinois without means for their support, and
brought with him to the territory a common courtesan, whom he introduced
as his wife. This woman he honored with a place by his side while he sat
in court dispensing advice to the “Mormons” on morality. Judge Stiles had
been a member of the Church, but was excommunicated for immoral conduct.
Like most characters of that class, he became very abusive and a bitter
enemy of the Church. The corruption of Judge Drummond coming to light,
that individual left the territory in disgrace.
Falsehoods of Drummond and Stiles
March 30, 1857, Judge Drummond wrote a letter to the
attorney general of the United States, making false charges against
Governor Young and the “Mormon” people. He went to Carson County to hold
court, and then continued on to the coast never to return to Utah. In his
communication he declared that the records of the supreme court of Utah
had been destroyed; that Brigham Young had given his approval to this
treasonable deed, and with his knowledge it was done; that Brigham Young,
as governor, had pardoned “Mormon” criminals and imprisoned innocent
“Gentiles;” he had insulted federal judges; the American Government had
been traduced and men “insulted, harrassed and murdered for doing their
duty.” He accused the “Mormon” people of the murder of Almon W. Babbitt;
of perpetrating the Gunnison massacre,1 and of the death of
Judge Shaver, who died a natural death. He placed the responsibility of
these alleged crimes at the door of the authorities of the Church.
Judge Stiles also filed an affidavit at Washington,
affirming much that Judge Drummond had said, and emphasizing the statement
that the court records and papers had been destroyed. Others also added to
the unrighteous accusations with the evil thought of bringing the Church
into disrepute. Among them were Indian Agent Garland Hurt, and W. M.
Magraw. The latter having been disappointed in losing the contract to
carry mail across the plains, which contract was awarded to Hiram Kimball,
a “Mormon,” sought revenge by circulating falsehoods. He stated that the
civil laws of the territory were “overshadowed and neutralized by the
so-styled ecclesiastical organization, as despotic, dangerous and
damnable” as ever existed. Other, and even more serious accusations, he
forwarded in a communication to President Buchanan in October, 1856.
Denial of False Charges
Curtis E. Bolton, deputy clerk of the supreme court of
Utah, made denial in his official capacity, of the Drummond charges. He
stated that the records and papers of the court were all intact. This
denial was speedily forwarded to the attorney general of the United
States, but was ignored in the face of the various statements of the lying
officials.
The Conspirators Demand Governor Young’s Removal
At the time these falsehoods were sent to Washington,
Governor Brigham Young was serving his second term. At the close of his
first term as governor, Col. Edward J. Steptoe of the United States Army,
was appointed to that position. He declined, and with Chief Justice
Kinney, headed a petition, which bore the names of the federal officials,
army officers and prominent citizens in the territory, asking for the
reappointment of Governor Young. The petition bore fruit and President
Franklin Pierce continued Brigham Young in office. These conspirators now
endeavored to have him removed, and this desire was very largely the
underlying cause in their evil accusations.
“Buchanan’s Blunder”
Accepting at their face value, without any
investigation, the inflammatory and lying charges of the enemies of Utah,
President James Buchanan determined on changing the governor, and also
appointed new judges. He further directed that an army must accompany the
new appointees, as a posse comitatus, to sustain the authority of these
officers, and suppress “rebellion” among the “Mormon” people.
It was announced through the war department that the
“Mormons” “implicitly obey their prophet from whose decrees there is no
appeal.” Moreover, that they had aimed from the beginning to secede from
the Union, and had not “preserved even the semblance of obedience to
authority, only as it would benefit themselves.” Such was the ignorance of
the authorities at Washington regarding Latter-day Saint affairs, so soon
after the loyal and remarkable feat performed by the Mormon Battalion in
the war which made their territory a part of the United States. Such was
to be the reward of this loyal people who would sacrifice five hundred of
their most capable men in the hour of their greatest distress, at the call
of their country. These expressions from Washington were made in the face
of the constant appeals by the “Mormon” people for a form of government
under the Stars and Stripes, in spite of the evil treatment they had
constantly received within the borders of the United States; and, too,
after their appeal to the general government for redress of grievances was
answered from Washington, that their cause was just, but nothing could be
done for them.
When appealing to Washington for redress, while they
resided in Illinois, they were advised by governors and leading statesmen
to move to Oregon, where they could set up a government of their own, free
and independent of all other earthly powers. Their reply to such advice
was, that they were American citizens, and where they went they would take
the flag of their country with them.
It appears from this distant date, that there were other
motives prompting the President of the United States in sending the flower
of the army into the “Mormon” country, ostensibly to suppress a rebellion
which did not exist, and aid in a rebellion soon to occur, which was
destined to divide the nation asunder. What-ever the motive, the army was
sent, and was kept in Utah for a number of years at the beginning of a
critical period of the nation’s history.
Call of the Army
May 28, 1857, orders were issued from the war department
for the assembling of an army at Fort Leavenworth, to march to Utah as
soon as possible. All mail toward Utah had been stopped, and for some
reason the government conducted its campaign against that territory with
great secrecy. It was practically a declaration of war by the United
States against one of her dependent units, without investigation or just
cause—a thing without a parallel in the annals of our country. “It
is probable,” states Bancroft, “that no expedition was ever dispatched by
the United States better equipped and provisioned than was the army of
Utah, of which the portion now under orders mustered about twenty-five
hundred men.” Then he argues that the expedition was conducted in the
interests of the contractors. The men who secured the flour contract
netted in a single year the sum of one hundred and seventy thousand
dollars.
How the Saints Learned of the Expedition
While all these warlike preparations were going on, the
Saints in the Rocky Mountains, dwelling in peace, were innocent of any
threatened invasion. The first information of such an expedition was
received by Elders Feramorz Little and Ephraim K. Hanks in February, 1857.
They had just arrived at Independence with mail, where they heard from
several parties who desired to secure contracts from the government for
handling the supply trains, that a movement was on foot against Utah. They
could hardly believe the rumors and reports that came to their ears. Later
Elder Abraham O. Smoot, on his way east with mail, met Elder Little at
Fort Laramie, from whom he heard the rumors. Proceeding on his way, Elder
Smoot met some troops and several trains of government supplies. From his
inquiries he received no satisfactory answer as to their destination, only
that they were bound for a western post and that the supplies belonged to
William H. Russell. At Independence he learned from Mr. Russell that the
destination of the trains was Salt Lake City, and that government troops
would soon follow. He was also informed that Brigham Young had been
superseded as governor and that new federal officers had been appointed
for Utah. Gaining all the information he could, Elder Smoot commenced his
homeward journey, traveling leisurely at first, for fear of arousing
suspicion, but increasing his speed as he neared his destination. A short
distance east of Fort Laramie he met Orrin Porter Rockwell with the east
bound mail. To him he told his story and together they, and Judson L.
Stoddard, returned to the Salt Lake Valley, arriving on the evening of
July 23.
The 24th of July Celebration
When these brethren arrived they learned that President
Brigham Young and about twenty-six hundred people had gone to Silver Lake,
at the head of Big Cottonwood Canyon. There they expected to celebrate the
twenty-fourth—the tenth anniversary of the arrival of the pioneers
in Salt Lake Valley. On the morning of the 24th, Mayor Smoot of Salt Lake
City, Judson L. Stoddard, Judge Elias Smith and Orrin P. Rockwell, started
for the scene of the celebration. They arrived in the afternoon in the
midst of the ceremonies and the first view to attract their gaze was the
Stars and Stripes unfurled from two lofty peaks and some of the tallest
trees. With grave countenances these messengers bearing evil tidings
approached Governor Young and told their story. A council of the brethren
was called and the situation discussed. That evening the assembly was
informed by General Daniel H. Wells of the militia, that an army was on
its way to Utah. He gave instructions as to the manner of the departure
from the camp on the following morning. Early the next day (25th) the
people, so happy the day before, returned to their homes with bowed heads
and hearts filled with sadness.
The Decision of the Council
Twice in Missouri and once in Illinois had the Saints
been driven from their homes at the point of the bayonet, and that, too,
by aid of state authority. Their Prophet and Patriarch had been foully
murdered by a mob while under the pledge of protection of a governor of
Illinois. The Saints had been murdered and robbed while the nation looked
on without interference. And now there was coming to their distant home, a
body of troops organized and equipped by the President of the United
States. They were coming without warning and without valid excuse. Was it
not natural under all the circumstances for this people to feel that once
again they were to be butchered, robbed and driven—where, no one
could tell! Naturally they were aroused. Their backs were against the
wall. They must make a stand, and if to fight was the intention of the
troops, then fight it should be. They were determined to maintain their
inherent and constitutional rights. Conquered, they should not be; if they
were driven they should leave the land as desolate as they found it. If
the government of the United States desired to install new officers, they
could come in peace, and welcome. Such had always been the attitude of the
Latter-day Saints. They could only judge by the experiences of the past
what the designs of the army might be, for no word had been sent them of
its purpose. “Liars have reported that this people have committed treason,
and upon their misrepresentations the President has ordered out troops to
assist in officering the territory,” said President Young. “We have
transgressed no law, neither do we intend to do so; but as for any nation
coming to destroy this people, God Almighty being my helper, it shall not
be.” Such was the decision of the councils of the Church. And where is the
patriot whose blood would not burn within his veins; whose heart would not
beat for freedom; who would not stand as this band of humble worshipers of
the Lord and Savior of mankind proposed to stand, if driven to the extreme?
Captain Van Vliet
In advance of the army there came to Utah Captain
Stewart Van Vliet of the commissary department. His object was to discover
if forage and fuel could be obtained for the troops while in the
territory. As soon as he arrived he obtained an interview with Governor
Young. He was treated with the greatest kindness and hospitality, and so
he reported to his superiors. However, he was informed that no hostile
force would be permitted to enter the Salt Lake Valley; there was an
abundance of every thing the troops would need, but not one thing would be
sold to them. Federal officers could come, if they came in peace, and
would be kindly and courteously received; but they could not bring an
hostile army.
Captain Van Vliet’s Report
In his report Captain Van Vliet said:
“In the course of my conversation with the Governor
and the influential men of the Territory, I told them plainly and
frankly what I conceived would be the result of their present course. I
told them that they might prevent the small military force now
approaching Utah from getting through the narrow defiles and rugged
passes of the mountains this year, but that next season the United
States Government would send troops sufficient to overcome all
opposition. The answer to this was invariably the same: ‘We are aware
that such will be the case; but when those troops arrive they will find
Utah a desert. Every house will be burned to the ground, every tree cut
down, and every field laid waste. We have three years’ provisions on
hand, which we will cache, and then take to the mountains and bid
defiance to all the powers of the Government.’“I attended their services on Sunday, and, in course
of a sermon delivered by Elder Taylor, he referred to the approach of
the troops and declared they should not enter the Territory. He then
referred to the probability of an overpowering force being sent against
them, and desired all present who would apply the torch to their
buildings, cut down their trees, and lay waste their fields, to hold up
their hands. Every hand, in an audience numbering over four thousand
persons, was raised at the same moment. During my stay in the city I
visited several families, and all with whom I was thrown, looked upon
the present movement of the troops towards their Territory as the
commencement of another religious persecution, and expressed a fixed
determination to sustain Governor Young in any measure he might adopt.”
Good Resulting from the Visit
The sympathy of Captain Van Vliet was drawn out toward
the people. He admired their stand although careful of his expression as
he was under orders from the government. He was convinced that the people
had been misrepresented and lied about, and it is said he declared that if
the government made war upon the Saints, he would withdraw from the army.
However, he thought the government would send to Utah an investigating
committee. “I believe,” said Governor Young, “God sent you here, and that
good will grow out of it. I was glad when I heard you were coming. If we
can keep the peace this winter, I feel sure that something will occur to
prevent the shedding of blood.” The captain returned to Washington and
made his report to the secretary of war.
Johnston in Command
When the army was ordered to Utah the command was given
to General W. S. Harney, who was at the time in charge at Fort
Leavenworth. Captain Van Vliet called on him when returning to Washington
after his visit in Utah. The captain informed General Harney of the
attitude of the “Mormon” people and the conditions as they existed in the
territory. The general replied: “I am ordered there, and I will winter in
the valley, or in hell.” Late in the summer the command was given to
Colonel Albert Sidney Johnston, with the rank of brevet brigadier general.
The Start for Utah
The vanguard of the troops, under Colonel E. B.
Alexander, started from Fort Leavenworth in July. 1857. With them traveled
Alfred Cumming, of Georgia, the newly appointed governor, and other
federal appointees for Utah. As the troops reached the South Pass, they
were met by Captain Van Vliet, who advised them not to attempt to enter
the Salt Lake Valley that winter, as no arrangements could be made for
supplies and they would have to fight their way through. Some of the young
officers, who were in advance, ignored the warning, and expressed the
thought that they were sufficiently able to force their way to Salt Lake
City—”that they could whip all Utah.” The second regiment he met was
commanded by old officers, who considered the matter seriously and
expressed the thought that it was an imposition that they should be sent
out west “as a political movement to kill innocent people, or to get
killed.2”
Martial Law Proclaimed
After the departure of Captain Van Vliet from Salt Lake
City, and while the army was near the border of Utah, Governor Young
proclaimed martial law throughout the territory and notified Colonel
Alexander of this action. The militia was ordered to be held in readiness
to repel any attempted invasion, but instructions were given that no blood
should be shed, unless it was absolutely unavoidable. These instructions
were carefully followed and only once during the campaign were shots fired
with intent to kill, and these were fired by the government forces at a
detachment under command of Major Lot Smith, who had been sent out to
destroy their trains. When fired upon there was no retaliation by the
members of the militia.
General Wells in Echo Canyon
Following the proclamation of Governor Young, Lieutenant
General Daniel H. Wells of the Nauvoo Legion—the name by which the
militia was known—established headquarters at “The Narrows” in Echo
Canyon, a defile, rugged and steep, where a few men could hold an army. To
this point about twelve hundred and fifty men, from several companies of
the militia, were ordered to report, and maintain the pass by force of
arms against any attempted invasion.
Governor Young’s Ultimatum
Colonel Alexander continued his march, as it was fully
expected that he would, and crossed the border of the territory. September
29, General Wells forwarded to Colonel Alexander copies of Governor
Young’s proclamation, a copy of the laws of Utah, and a letter from
Governor Young addressed to “The Officer commanding the forces now
invading Utah Territory.” In this letter the following occurs:
“By virtue of the authority vested in me, I have
issued, and forwarded you a copy of my proclamation forbidding the
entrance of armed forces into this Territory. This you have disregarded.
I now further direct that you retire forthwith from the Territory, by
the same route you entered. Should you deem this impracticable, and
prefer to remain until spring in the vicinity of your present
encampment, Black’s Fork,3 or Green River,
you can do so in peace and unmolested on condition that you deposit your
arms and ammunition with Lewis Robison, quartermaster general of the
Territory, and leave in the spring, as soon as the condition of the
roads will permit you to march; and should you fall short of provisions,
they can be furnished you, upon making the proper applications therefor.
General D. H. Wells will forward this, and receive any
communication you may have to make.”
In forwarding these communications General Wells
declared that he was determined to carry out Governor Young’s instructions.
Colonel Alexander’s Reply
Colonel Alexander made the only reply possible which was
to the effect that he would submit the communications to his superior
officers and “in the meantime,” he added, “I have only to say that these
troops are here by order of the President of the United States, and their
future movements will depend entirely upon orders issued by competent
military authority.4
Guerrilla Warfare
Following this correspondence General Wells determined
on carrying out his instructions. He ordered Major Joseph Taylor and
others under his command to annoy the troops; stampede their cattle; set
fire to their trains; burn the whole country before them and on their
flanks; keep them from sleeping by night surprises; blockade the road; but
must avoid strictly the taking of life. These instructions were faithfully
followed and Major Lot Smith with a company of mounted rangers destroyed
trains, ran off cattle and burned the grass, and otherwise inflicted
damage, but no blood was shed.
Arrival of General Johnston
Early in November, 1857, General Albert Sidney Johnston,
with additional troops and supplies, overtook the main body of the army on
Black’s Fork. He was a capable and popular officer and soon enthused the
troops who had become dispirited because of their many reverses. Their
journey had not been a pleasant one, the Indians had run off many of their
cattle, and the “Mormon” mountaineers had harassed them, had burned their
trains of supplies, and destroyed the grass on which their teams and
cattle were dependent. But their troubles were only beginning. Their
haughty commander ordered a forward movement toward Fort Bridger,
disdaining to turn from the direct route through the mountains.
If “the stars in their courses fought against Sisera,”
in the days of ancient Israel, surely the elements fought against
Johnston’s army in the days of modern Israel. From their camp to Fort
Bridger was less than forty miles, but it was a barren desert. They found
no shelter from the winter winds, there was no fuel, except the sage, and
very little pasture for their animals. They commenced on the 6th of
November, and their trains, extending for many miles, were forced to face
the snow and sleet of the most severe winter weather. Their teams were
goaded until they dropped dead in their traces. Fifteen days they were on
the journey. Their cattle died for lack of food and exposure to freezing
weather. When they arrived they found that Bridger and also Fort Supply,
twelve miles away, had been burned by the militia.
The Forward March Abandoned
It became apparent that it would be impossible to reach
the Salt Lake Valley before the coming spring. With great reluctance and
injured pride the commander gave orders that the troops go into winter
quarters on Black’s Fork. During the winter months Chief Justice Eckles,
who with other federal officers dwelt in the camp, organized a court,
without waiting to qualify, and indicted the leading men in Utah for
treason and rebellion.
Proclamation of Governor Cumming
Governor Cumming issued a proclamation to the people of
the territory in which he said: “I come among you with no prejudice or
enmities, and by the exercise of a just and firm administration I hope to
command your confidence. Freedom of conscience and the use of your own
peculiar mode of serving God are sacred rights, the exercise of which is
guaranteed by the Constitution, and with which it is not the province of
the government or the disposition of its representatives in the territory
to interfere.” Let it be said to his credit that these sentiments were
sincere, and when he was established in his office he was brave enough to
execute justice as he saw it. He commanded all armed bodies in the
territory to disband and return to their homes stating that disobedience
would “subject the offenders to the punishment due to traitors.”
There was no disposition on the part of the militia to
disband. Too often had they been despoiled by mobs under guise of lawful
troops. They had stood enough and were determined to defend their homes,
no matter what were the accusations made against them.
The Mediation of Colonel Kane
At the beginning of the difficulties Governor Young sent
a communication to Colonel Thomas L. Kane, explaining the motives in
declaring martial law in Utah, and asking him to intercede at Washington.
This loyal friend of the “Mormons” did not fail. He interviewed the
President and offered his services as mediator between the government and
the people of Utah. His services were accepted and he crossed the Isthmus
of Panama, sailing from New York, and proceeded from California to Utah,
where he arrived in February, 1858. At the time Congress was preparing to
send reinforcements and money to carry on the “war.” Colonel Kane arrived,
delicate in health, and wishing to test the “Mormon” people appeared in
Salt Lake City in disguise as “Dr. Osborne.” He received hospitable
treatment and was welcomed warmly when he became known. He reported the
nature of his visit and reported that Captain Van Vliet had proved himself
a friend of the “Mormons” on his return to Washington.
After a few days’ rest Colonel Kane departed for the
army camp on Black’s Fork to interview Governor Cumming. After severe
trials and adventures he arrived at the camp. Governor Cumming received
him cordially and agreed to place himself under his direction and go to
Salt Lake City without military aid. Such a step was strongly opposed by
General Johnston, who attempted to arrest Colonel Kane as a spy. Governor
Cumming felt insulted at the indignity offered and demanded an
explanation, which the commanding officer failed to give in a satisfactory
manner. The incident almost precipitated a duel between General Johnston
and Colonel Kane.
Governor Cumming Enters Salt Lake City—His
Reception
Accompanied by Colonel Kane and two servants, Governor
Cumming set out for Salt Lake City. On the way they were met by an escort
of Utah cavalry. Arriving in the city he was received with a cordial
reception and was conducted to the home of William C. Staines, the
territorial librarian. President Young called on him and bid him welcome
saying, every facility that he might require for the efficient performance
of his administrative duties, would be at his command. The governor wrote
to General Johnston saying: “I have been everywhere recognized as Governor
of Utah; and so far from having encountered insults or indignities, I am
satisfied in being able to state to you, that in passing through the
settlements I have been universally greeted with such respectful
attentions as are due to the representative authority of the United States
in the territory.”
The Governor’s Report to Secretary Cass
After a thorough examination, and finding all the
records of the courts in perfect order, Governor Cumming wrote to
Secretary of State Lewis M. Cass informing him of the true conditions in
the territory and of the false reports which had stood as a foundation for
the sending of an army.
The Exodus Toward the South
When Governor Cumming arrived in the city he discovered
that many of the inhabitants of that place and the settlements to the
north, had left their homes. Others were journeying toward the south.
Where they were bound he could not learn more than that they were “going
south” and driving their flocks and herds before them. He expressed the
belief to the government that the destiny of these people was Sonora in
northern Mexico. He regretted greatly that they felt it necessary to move,
but he could do nothing to persuade them to remain as long as they were
menaced by an army. Their experience in the past was too bitter in this
regard, and could not be forgotten.
“Our military force could overwhelm most of these poor
people,” wrote the governor, “involving men, women, and children in a
common fate, but there are among the ‘Mormons’ brave men, accustomed to
arms and horses; men who could fight desperately as guerrillas: and who,
if the settlements are destroyed, will subject the country to an expensive
and protracted war, without any compensating results. They will, I am
sure, submit to ‘trial by their peers,’ but they will not brook the idea
of trials by ‘juries’ composed of ‘teamsters and followers of the camp.’”
The Governor’s Wife Pleads for the People
In the middle of May, Governor Cumming returned to Camp
Scott, where the troops were quartered. When he returned, his wife was
with him. She gazed upon the deserted homes—for the people had
departed, leaving only a guard to fire their property should the troops
arrive in hostile attitude. The good woman wept and pleaded with her
husband to do something to bring back the people. “Rest assured madam,”
said he, “I shall do all I can. I only wish I could be in Washington for
two hours; I am sure I could convince the government that we have no need
of troops.”
The Peace Commission
Through the good services of faithful friends—
among whom Colonel Thomas L. Kane stands out in bold relief—the
government was persuaded to send peace commissioners to Utah. These
gentlemen were Governor L. W. Powell of Kentucky and Major Ben
McCullock of Texas. With them came Jacob Forney, Indian Superintendent for
Utah. They met with Governor Cumming, Brigham Young and other prominent
men, when the whole situation was discussed. It was agreed that there
should be no opposition to Johnston’s army passing through the city
providing they were not permitted to stop, but should pass on to make
their camp at least forty miles away.
Their Epistle to Johnston
An agreement having been reached, the commissioners
addressed a communication to General Johnston advising him of what had
been done and requesting him to make proclamation among his troops. The
commander was surprised at the decision, stating that the army would not
trespass upon the rights or property of the peaceable citizens. His men,
many of them, were greatly disappointed, for they were to be denied the
privilege of plunder for which they hoped and talked about as they marched
upon their way.
The Arrival of the Troops
June 26, 1858, the army under command of General
Johnston, entered the Salt Lake Valley through Emigration Canyon. They
passed through the city, now almost without inhabitants, and camped on the
opposite side of Jordan river. Colonel Cooke, as he rode through the
streets of the city, bared his head in honor of the valiant and loyal men
of the Mormon Battalion. Three days after their arrival the troops passed
on to the southwest and camped in Cedar Valley where they founded Camp
Floyd, named after the Secretary of War, and here was to be their scene of
action for several years to come.
The President’s “Pardon”
On the 6th of April, President Buchanan signed a
proclamation, “offering to the inhabitants of Utah, who shall submit to
the laws, a free pardon for the seditions and treasons heretofore by them
committed; warning those who still persist, after notice of this
proclamation in the present rebellion against the United States, that they
must expect no further lenity.” This document, which is quite lengthy, was
brought to Utah with the commissioners. The authorities of the Church
denied that they had been disloyal, and disputed the statements in the
President’s proclamation. Nevertheless, they accepted his pardon for
driving off the cattle and burning the army trains, which they stoutly
maintained was done in self-defense; but the other charges they fully
denied.
The fact is that President Buchanan had been roundly
scored in the press, and by statesmen in our own country and abroad. The
easiest way out of it, for he had committed a great blunder, was to issue
a proclamation exonerating himself, and pardoning the “culprits” who dared
to maintain their rights against such overwhelming odds.
Notes
Captain John W. Gunnison, in charge of a party of topographical
engineers, was murdered by Indians, with a number of his party, near
Sevier Lake, in October 1853. The massacre was in revenge for the killing
of one Indian and the wounding of two others, by a company of emigrants on
their way to California. According to Indian practice the next company
that came along was attacked as a reprisal. At the time of this deed of
blood the Indians under Chief Walker were waging war on the inhabitants of
Utah, that event is known in historical annals as “The Walker War.”
Captain Gunnison and companions were buried at Fillmore, with respect and
honor. The tragedy cast a gloom over all the “Mormon” settlements, for the
leader of this company of government representatives was respected by all
the people for his kindness and friendly feeling.
2. Colonel Alexander, the ranking officer of the
advance troops was a kindly officer inclined towards establishing peace.
Captain Van Vliet had come in contact with the Latter-day Saints at Winter
Quarters, when they were on the plains. Another officer with these troops
whose sympathy and good will went out toward the “Mormons” was Colonel
Philip St. George Cooke, who led the Mormon Battalion in the Mexican War.
General Johnston was from the South, proud and haughty. He looked upon the
“Mormons” and spoke of them as “rebels” and was inclined to treat them as
such.
The spirit also prevailed among the troops that the
“Mormons” were their common prey, and they constantly, while on the march,
boasted with ribald jests, of what they would do when they arrived in Salt
Lake City. “We were well informed as to the object of the coming of the
army,” said Elder John Taylor to Vice-President Schuyler Colfax, in 1869.
“We had men in all their camps, and knew what was intended. There was a
continual boast among the men and officers, even before they left the
Missouri River, of what they intended to do with the ‘Mormons.’ The houses
were picked out that certain persons were to inhabit; farms, property, and
women were to be distributed. ‘Beauty and Booty’ were their watchword. We
were to have another grand ‘Mormon’ conquest, and our houses, gardens,
orchards, vineyards fields, wives and daughters were to be the spoils.”
Black’s Fork and Green River mentioned here were at that time within
the borders of Utah, they are now in Wyoming, the corner in which they are
located having been severed from Utah in 1863 and 1868.
The question might be raised as to why Brigham Young would forward a
communication as governor, when another had been appointed. Governor Young
had not been notified that his successor had been appointed and that
successor had not qualified as governor.
Chapter 44
A Shocking Crime
While Captain Van Vliet was interviewing President
Brigham Young, there was occurring in the southwest corner of Utah—
about three hundred miles from Salt Lake City—the most horrible and
shocking crime ever perpetrated within the borders of the state. It was
the massacre at Mountain Meadows of a company of emigrants who were
journeying to southern California. This bloody and diabolical deed
commenced at dawn, September 7, 1857, and continued until the 11th, when
the besieged emigrants who survived the attacks, under promise of
protection were foully murdered.
It was the deed of enraged Indians aided by a number of
white men, who took vengeance into their hands for wrongs committed by a
few of the emigrants who were pronounced enemies of both whites and
Indians.
It was a crime for which there can be no apology or
excuse, a thing treacherous and damnable in the extreme. But for the
“Mormon” people it was most unfortunate that it should happen at this
particular time. There were circulating throughout the nation many evil
reports concerning the Latter-day Saints. All manner of crimes and murders
occurring within a thousand miles of Utah, were charged against them. Even
the executive of the nation and other high officials were countenancing
these reports and aiding in their circulation. The army was on the plains
making its way to Utah to suppress alleged violation of law and rebellion;
and now, to add to the horror of the situation, the report went forth that
the “Mormons” had attacked and killed a party of innocent people
peacefully passing through their land. Thus color was given to the
falsehood that life and property of “Gentiles” were unsafe within the
Territory of Utah.1
It may be said without fear of successful contradiction,
that there was less crime committed in Utah during the days of pioneer
life than in any other similarly situated section of the country.
California had her vigilantes who executed judgment with swift vengeance,
without legal trial. Such was also the condition in other border states
and territories, and woe to the individual who incurred the wrath of the
powers who controlled. The “Mormon” people had been taught from the
beginning: “Thou shalt not kill.” Murder, according to their teaching,
committed wantonly, was a sin for which there was no forgiveness in this
life, neither in the life to come. Next, and like unto it stood sexual
immorality. Both of these great sins were denounced by the Saints most
emphatically.
Crimes Falsely Charged to the Church Authorities
One thing most trying to the members of the Church was
the attempt by their enemies to charge Brigham Young and the leaders of
the Church with every wrong committed in the western country. These
attempts led Jacob Forney, Indian Agent in 1859, to write to Washington
saying:
“I fear, and I regret to say it, that with certain
parties here there is a greater anxiety to connect Brigham Young and
other Church dignitaries with every criminal offense than diligent
endeavor to punish the actual perpetrators of crime.”
How the Massacre Occurred
About the time the news arrived in Salt Lake City of the
coming of an army, there was passing through the city under command of
Captain Fancher, a company of emigrants from Arkansas and Missouri. This
company consisted of about thirty families, numbering one hundred and
thirty-seven persons. The Arkansas emigrants appeared to be respectable
and well-to-do. With them there traveled a rough and reckless company
calling themselves “Missouri Wild Cats,” who conducted themselves in
keeping with the name. This company was advised by Elder Charles C. Rich,
one of the leaders of the Church, to take the northern route. Had they
done so they would have saved their lives. They went as far as Bear River
and then returned deciding to journey to the south. On their way, it is
alleged, the rougher element of the party abused the people of the
southern settlements through which they passed. They tore down fences,
destroyed property, insulted women, and otherwise made themselves
obnoxious. It is said, on reliable authority, that at Fillmore they
threatened to destroy the town, “and boasted of their participation in the
murders and other outrages that were inflicted upon the ‘Mormons’ in
Missouri and Illinois.” At Corn Creek, fifteen miles farther to the south,
it was reported that they poisoned the springs and also the body of an ox
that had died. The carcass was eaten by a band of Piute Indians and ten of
their number died. Some of the cattle of the settlers died from drinking
of the poisoned springs. As the cattle were fat, the owners “tried them
up” for the tallow, and a number of white persons were poisoned from the
handling of the meat. These “Wild Cats” expressed their pleasure at the
coming of the army, and threatened to stop at some convenient place and
leave their women and children, and return to assist the troops in killing
every “Mormon” there was in the mountains.
Just to what extent credence can be placed in these
charges cannot be determined. The fact remains, however, that they gave
expression to their hatred of the “Mormon” people, made many threats, and
abused the Indians along their way.
The Purchase of Supplies
It has been said that these emigrants could not purchase
supplies in Salt Lake City and the other settlements of the Saints, and
had been ordered away from Salt Lake City by President Young. This is not
the fact. President Young did not know they were in the city and first
heard of them after they had departed. Along the way they did obtain
supplies as they desired and as the Saints were able to impart to them, as
there is abundant evidence to show. They were well treated by most of the
settlers, and not until their own actions brought upon them the ill will
of the southern settlements was this attitude changed.
Word Sent to Brigham Young
So intense did the feeling become on the part of both
the Indians and the white population in the southern settlements that it
was deemed necessary to send a messenger to Governor Brigham Young to know
what should be done. Some of the people expressed the feeling that since
the emigrants had declared themselves as enemies they should be treated as
such, but the more sober minded maintained that they should be permitted
to continue their journey to the coast unmolested. James H. Haslam carried
a message from Colonel Isaac Haight, of the militia, to Salt Lake City to
obtain advice of Governor Young. In the meantime it was agreed that every
effort should be made to pacify the Indians and prevent them from making
an attack. Haslam left Cedar City in the afternoon of Monday, September 7,
and made all haste on horseback, arriving in Salt Lake City on the morning
of the 10th. He immediately delivered his message, and Governor Young
asked him if he could undertake the return journey without delay. He said
he could. “Go with all speed, spare no horse flesh. The emigrants must not
be meddled with, if it takes all Iron County to prevent it. They must go
free and unmolested.” This was the answer he received. Haslam, although he
had just finished a hard journey, immediately returned arriving in Cedar
City on the 13th with a written message from Governor Young to Colonel
Haight.
The Answer Arrives Too Late
The message to Colonel Haight of the militia from
Governor Young was as follows:
“In regard to the emigration trains passing through
our settlements, we must not interfere with them until they are first
notified to keep away. You must not meddle with them. There are no other
trains that I know of. If those who are there will leave, let them go in
peace.”
Colonel Isaac C. Haight read the letter, and shedding
tears replied: “Too late, too late!” The morning (September 7) Haslam left
to obtain word from Governor Young, the work of death among the
unfortunate victims had commenced.
The Attack upon the Emigrant Train
Early in September the emigrant train of the Arkansas
and Missouri companies camped in the little valley known as the Mountain
Meadows. There they contemplated remaining for several days. In the
meantime their conduct had aroused the Indian tribes who now surrounded
their camp in hostile attitude. As near as can be ascertained, on the
morning of the 7th of September at the break of day, the attack upon the
emigrants began. At the first volley seven men were killed and sixteen
were wounded. The victims were taken unawares, but being well armed,
fought bravely for their lives and were successful in repelling the
attack. Several Indians were killed including two of their chiefs. The
Indians sent runners throughout the surrounding country calling for
reinforcements from among their tribes, and for John D. Lee, who had been
in close touch with Indian affairs as their farmer, to come and lead them
to victory. Lee hurried to the scene from his home in Harmony, and seemed
to partake of the frenzy of the redmen. Later, other white men appeared
upon the scene, having been lured to the meadows, with the request that
their services were needed in burying the dead. Some of them remained,
willingly or by coercion, to participate in the massacre which followed.
The Surrender—Treachery of Their Captors
During the lull following the first attack, the
emigrants formed their wagons in a ring and threw up breastworks for their
protection, awaiting the onslaught which they knew was sure to come. Some
time was spent by the Indians and their white allies discussing the fate
of the unfortunate emigrants. The victims discovered that white men were
in league with the Indians, and this knowledge sealed their fate. It was
determined by those making the attack that no emigrant should live who
could tell the tale.
On the morning of Friday the 11th, Lee induced the
emigrants to surrender under promise of protection and conveyance to a
place of safety. They were led to a place where the Indians were in
ambush, and at a given signal a volley of shots rang out, both Indians and
white men participating in the outrage. Seventeen children of tender years
—ranging in age from a few months to seven years—were all that
were spared. These children were cared for by the settlers until the
government by act of Congress returned them to their friends in Arkansas.
A Bloody Oath
The white men who engaged in this horrible slaughter
entered into a league, by a strong and binding oath, that they would never
reveal the part they played in this gruesome tragedy. A false report was
forwarded to Governor Young. Lee also reported in person, laying the blame
solely to the Indians. Governor Young wept bitterly and was horrified at
the recital of the tale.
The Execution of Lee
For several years the facts relating to the tragedy were
unknown, but gradually the truth leaked out and an investigation was made
of the affair. John D. Lee was excommunicated from the Church with the
injunction from President Young that under no circumstances should he ever
be admitted as a member again. Action was also taken against others as the
truth became known. In later years Lee was convicted of the crime and paid
the penalty with his life. His execution took place on the site of the
horrid scene. Others who were implicated fled from the territory and died
fugitives. While they thus evaded the justice which earthly tribunals
might inflict, they still await the trial for their crime before a Higher
Court where justice never fails.
Notes
“It may as well be understood at the outset that this horrible crime
so often and so persistently charged upon the “Mormon” Church and its
leaders, was the crime of an individual, the crime of a fanatic of the
worst stamp, one who was a member of the “Mormon” Church, but of whose
intentions the Church knew nothing, and whose bloody acts, the members of
the Church, high and low, regard with as much abhorrence as any out of the
Church. Indeed, the blow fell upon the brotherhood with threefold force
and damage. There was the cruelty of it, which wrung their hearts; and
there was the strength it lent their enemies further to malign and molest
them. The “Mormons” denounce the Mountain Meadows Massacre, and every act
connected therewith, as earnestly and honestly as any in the outside
world. This is abundantly proved and may be accepted as a historical fact.
(Bancroft’s History of Utah, p. 544)
Chapter 45
Demoralizing Effects of the Army’s Presence
It was the part of wisdom for President Brigham Young
and his associates to insist on the camp of the army being far removed
from Salt Lake City. It was with reluctance that their commander complied
with that request, which was enforced by the peace commissioners. Very
little good came to the people of Utah from the presence in their midst,
of an armed force, with all its attendant camp followers. It is true that
the people benefited in a financial way. They were able to dispose of
their products for ready cash and clothing; but they could have managed to
live—as they did before the army came—without these
advantages, which, of course, they were ready to receive.
There was no debauchery, no immorality or fear of
thieves breaking in to steal, in the communities of the Latter-day Saints,
before the strangers to their faith came in. With the army all these
attendant evils were introduced. The worst element with the army was, of
course, the camp following—the freighters and hangers-on, who were
not subject to the rigid discipline of army regulation. Yet, much of the
evil which resulted, can be traced to subordinate officers and men of the
ranks. With many of these, moral rectitude was a thing unknown; and woe to
the foolish creatures who, like flies caught in a spider-web, were lured
into camp.
To add to the difficulties, many of the enlisted men
filled their term of service and were discharged. Usually they were in
possession of very little means, and if a balance of pay was due them, it
was soon squandered. Such characters flocked to Salt Lake City and other
towns, where they became a terror to the inhabitants. Because of this, it
became necessary to increase the police force of Salt Lake City, at least
four fold. Appeals were made to Governor Cumming to get him to use his
influence to have the discharged men marched beyond the borders of the
territory. The governor took the matter up with General Johnston, with the
result that the condition was relieved in this respect to some small
degree. However, the situation could not fully be controlled by these
officers, and as long as Camp Floyd (later Crittenden) was occupied by the
troops, demoralizing agencies were at work, and the people were constantly
in a state of agitation.
Governor Cumming’s Report
In reporting affairs in Utah to the Secretary of State,
Governor Cumming made the following observations:
“Persons unbiased by prejudice who have visited this
Territory will, I think, agree in the opinion that a community is seldom
seen more marked by quiet and peaceable diligence than that of the
Mormons.“After the passage of the army, hundreds of
adventurers were attracted to these valleys, and met here some congenial
spirits. Banded together for rapine and acts of violence, they have
stolen large herds of horses and mules. Many of these men, maddened by
intemperance, or rendered desperate by losses at the gaming table, or by
various other causes, have shed each other’s blood in frequent
conflicts, and secret assassinations. These lawless and bloody deeds are
committed by them almost daily with impunity, and when their atrocity
and frequency shock the public mind, it has become the custom with a
certain set of people to exclaim against the people of Utah; but it is
an injustice to impute the acts of these desperadoes to the community in
general. With an equal show of justice might they be attributed to the
inhabitants of the States and Territories whence these men have so
recently emigrated.”
The New Federal Officers
Chief Justice Delano R. Eckels and the new secretary of
the territory, John Hartnett, arrived in Utah with the army. Jacob Forney,
the superintendent of Indian affairs, arrived with the peace
commissioners, and Judge Charles E. Sinclair and Attorney Alexander Wilson
came near the end of July. The third judge, John Cradlebaugh, did not
arrive until November. None of these officers were members of the Church.
After he had taken the oath of office, Chief Justice
Eckels took up his residence at Camp Floyd and Judge Sinclair made his
headquarters in Salt Lake City. Judge Cradlebaugh opened his court in
Provo in March, 1859, although the seat of his district was Fillmore.
“Progress of Civilization”
The majority of the government officials sent to Utah
during territorial days came obsessed with the idea that the “Mormons”
were an unpatriotic and ignorant class of people, bound by blind obedience
to the will of a set of knaves who presided over them. When a new
government appointee came to Utah, usually he felt it incumbent upon him
to begin his labors with a lecture to the people on loyalty and morality,
and advise them to cast off the yoke of ignorance which bound them. These
would-be reformers at times gave expression to the thought that they had
brought civilization among the “Mormons” and were endeavoring to reform
them. At the time of the return to the east in 1858, of one official—
who had been notoriously corrupt and immoral in his conduct while in Utah
—a number of the civil and military officers and some non-“Mormon”
merchants tendered him a dinner. In the course of their hilarity they
expressed the satisfaction he would feel in joining his “family and
friends in a moral and civilized community.”
Such expressions as this led President Brigham Young,
who was a sorrowful witness of the scenes of debauchery and crime
practiced by some of these “reformers,” to say to another retiring
official who was about to depart: “When you get back to the states, no
doubt you will be asked many questions about me. I wish you would tell
them that I am here, watching the progress of civilization.”
That some of these individuals were sincere, there can
be no question, and they should have credit for honest conviction. However
it was impossible for them to see the situation from the “Mormon”
viewpoint. They came with pre-conceived ideas regarding the doctrines and
practices of the Latter-day Saints, and were greatly prejudiced against
them. Their prejudice stood in their own light so that they took no
trouble to investigate or try to understand. In most cases it was
sufficient to know that the “Mormons” were a peculiar people with a
strange belief, in conflict with the doctrines of other people.
Many of these officers, however, were insincere. They
were guilty of the very sins with which they accused the Latter-day
Saints, and yet they brazenly sat in judgment and condemned the Saints,
while they, themselves, were guilty of revolting crimes.
Attitude of the Judges
Chief Justice Eckels was given to drunkenness and was
grossly immoral; yet he felt it his duty to advise that indictments be
issued against the leaders of the Church for the practice of plural
marriage. He did not know just how to handle the situation, for there were
no statutes either in the territory or in the United States to punish such
a thing. Therefore he attempted to place the matter under the old Mexican
law which had no application in United States territory.
Associate Justice Sinclair, who was usually drunk,
commenced his duties on the bench by charging the grand jury of his court,
to indict ex-Governor Brigham Young, General Daniel H. Wells, and other
“Mormon” leaders, for treason, on the ground that President Buchanan’s
pardon, “while a public act in the history of the country,” yet it was a
thing of which his court could not “take judicial cognizance.” United
States Attorney Alexander Wilson took a different view and so expressed
himself at length before the grand jury in open court, stating “that there
are now no acts of sedition, treason, or rebellion against the government
of the United States in this territory.” For that reason he would not
present bills or bring action against any inhabitant of the territory on
such a charge.
Bitterness of Cradlebaugh
Judge Cradlebaugh manifested a very bitter spirit
against the leaders of the Church. When he opened court at Provo, he made
a demand on General Johnston for several companies of troops from Camp
Floyd, and a detachment was furnished him. The reason the judge gave for
this action was that the presence of the soldiers was necessary to
preserve the peace, and take care of the prisoners because there was no
jail in Provo. The real reason was a desire to insult the people of the
town and to intimidate witnesses before the court. Inside of two weeks
there were about one thousand men in arms surrounding the court house.
Protest of the Citizens
Instead of keeping the peace, the presence of the troops
was a menace to the peace of the town. Five hundred citizens righteously
and vigorously protested against the insult in an address to the mayor and
city council. They declared that their “feelings were aggrieved and
outraged” by the appearance of a military force surrounding the court and
infesting the halls of justice, and they considered it a “high handed
outrage, a direct infringement upon the rights of American citizens and a
gross violation of their liberties and municipal immunities.”
The judge was informed by the mayor and city council of
the petition and was asked for the immediate removal of the troops beyond
the city limits. It was declared that their presence made it very
difficult for the officers of the city to preserve the peace. The judge
refused to listen to the appeal. Later another vigorous protest was made
by the city officials, who declared that soldiers had been caught breaking
into houses; they had engaged in drunken street brawls and had otherwise
disturbed the peace. However, Judge Cradlebaugh turned a deaf ear to all
appeals.
Governor Cumming’s Proclamation
Governor Cumming visited Provo in the month of March,
and to him an appeal was made by the mayor and council. The governor could
see the situation for himself, and forwarded a communication to General
Johnston requesting him to withdraw the troops. General Johnston refused
to hearken to the request of the governor, on the grounds that he was
there to serve each of the coordinate branches of the territorial civil
government, and was subject to the judicial as well as to the executive
department. Upon this refusal of the commander of the troops, Governor
Cumming issued a proclamation protesting against the presence of the
military force which had been called to Provo without his sanction and
contrary to the instructions given him by the government. Their presence,
said the governor, had a tendency to terrify the inhabitants and disturb
the peace. All future movements of the troops should be at his direction
in accordance with his instructions from Washington.
Result of the Conflict
The result of this conflict in authority was that Judge
Cradlebaugh and his associate, Judge Sinclair, sent a communication to the
attorney-general of the United States, Jeremiah S. Black, in relation to
the matter. Other letters were sent by Judge Eckels to the secretary of
state and by General Johnston to the secretary of war. The secretary of
state wrote to Governor Cumming for the facts which were furnished. When
the replies were received, the officious judges were rebuked and given to
understand that the armed forces in the territory were subject to the
command of the executive. Said the attorney general: “The governor is the
supreme executive of the territory. He is responsible for the public
peace. From the general law of the land, the nature of his office, and the
instructions he received from the state department, it ought to have been
understood that he alone had power to issue a requisition for the movement
of troops from one part of the territory to another.” He further stated
that “the condition of things in Utah made it extremely desirable that the
judges appointed for that territory should confine themselves strictly
within their own official sphere,” and leave accusations to the district
attorney, and arrests to the marshal, who was responsible for the
safe-keeping of criminals.
Attempt to Remove Governor Cumming
The rebuke from Washington was naturally very
displeasing to the judges, who were thus confined to the duties of their
office. In Camp Floyd there was manifestation of displeasure. A mass
meeting was held and an address was issued in which the “Mormons” were
accused of disloyalty and it was set forth that a great wrong had been
done in forcing the withdrawal of the troops from the protection of the
courts. The wrath of the disgruntled camp was also turned against Governor
Cumming, and the attempt was made to have him removed from office. This
might have been accomplished through the influence of General Johnston,
had not Colonel Thomas L. Kane once more come to the rescue.
Attack on President Young
When Judge Cradlebaugh organized his court at Provo, he
expressed his determination to investigate the Mountain Meadows massacre
and other crimes. This action would have been commendable if it had been
taken with a desire to execute justice, but it was a flagrant attempt to
connect President Young and the leading Church authorities with the crime.
He inferred that the guilty parties were among the leaders of the Church
and should be brought to justice. Later, accompanied by a United States
deputy marshal and a detachment of troops, he visited southern Utah and
collected what evidence could be obtained respecting the Mountain Meadows
massacre, leaving no stone unturned in the endeavor to implicate President
Brigham Young and others, in which attempt he miserably failed.
Nevertheless, to the grand jury he said: “The very fact of such a case as
that of the Mountain Meadows shows that there was some person high in the
estimation of the people, and it was done by that authority; . .
. and unless you do your duty, such will be the view that will be taken of
it. You can know no law but the laws of the United States and the laws you
have here. No person can commit crimes and say they are authorized by
higher authorities, and if they have any such notions they will have to
dispel them.”
Cradlebaugh’s Insult to the Jury
As the grand jury failed to act with the promptness he
thought they should, the judge dismissed them “as an evidently useless
appendage of a court of justice.” This unjustifiable attack was resented
by the grand jury in a written protest.
In a spirit of anger the judge dismissed criminals who
were before his court awaiting trial on grave charges, giving for his
reason the following excuse:
“When this people (‘Mormons’) come to their reason,
and manifest a disposition to punish their own high offenders, it will
be time to enforce the laws also for their protection. If this court
cannot bring you to a proper sense of your duty, it can at least turn
the savages in custody loose upon you.”
Attempt to Capture President Young
Another attempt was made about this time to get
President Young in the toils of the law on a groundless charge. It appears
that a number of criminals at Camp Floyd plotted to rob the government.
They hired a young engraver in Salt Lake City to duplicate the plate used
by the quartermaster at Camp Floyd in drawing on the government at St.
Louis and New York. The work was done, but the fraud was detected, and a
man by the name of Brewer was arrested. He turned state’s evidence and
threw the responsibility for the deed upon the engraver who had been hired
to do the work. As someone in the office of President Young had furnished
the paper on which the counterfeit notes were printed, the army officers
felt that they had a case against President Young, and manifested their
great pleasure at the prospect of implicating him. The officers entered
into a plot to secure his arrest. Thinking that an attempt to take him
openly would meet with resistance, the army was to be ordered to Salt Lake
City and the artillery was to make a breach in the wall surrounding his
premises, through which they would enter to secure President Young a
captive, and then carry him to Camp Floyd for trial.
Governor Cumming’s Stand
This plan was presented to Governor Cumming, who
listened to the plotters and examined their papers. “They rubbed their
hands,” said the governor, “and were jubilant; they had got the dead wood
on Brigham Young. I was indignant, sir, and told them, By ——,
gentlemen, you can’t do it! When you have a right to take Brigham Young,
gentlemen, you shall have him without creeping through walls. You shall
enter by his door with heads erect as becomes representatives of your
government. But till that time, gentlemen, you can’t touch Brigham Young.”
The plotters were greatly disappointed and returned to
Camp Floyd threatening to act in opposition to the executive. Because of
these rumors, Governor Cumming ordered General Daniel H. Wells to be
prepared with the militia to repel any such attack. It was a courageous
thing for the governor to do in the face of the strong feeling of
opposition existing at Camp Floyd against President Young.
Departure of the Army
As long as the army remained in Utah, such conditions
prevailed. In February, 1860, General Johnston departed from Camp Floyd to
go to Washington. He went by way of California and the Isthmus of Panama.
Shortly after, he was found leading an army of the South against an army
of the North, in the war of the Rebellion, endeavoring to destroy the
Union. In the battle of Shiloh he was killed while commanding the
Confederate forces. In 1861, Camp Floyd, then called Fort Crittenden, was
abandoned.
Retirement of Governor Cumming
Governor Cumming departed from Utah in May, 1861, a
short time before his term of office expired, and returned to his old home
in Georgia. His departure was much regretted, for he had served the people
faithfully and well, discharging every obligation as he saw his duty,
without fear or favor of men. The people certainly had good reason for
regret, as his successors quite generally were men of a very different
stamp.
The “Mormon” People and the Rebellion
The loyalty of the Latter-day Saints to the United
States had frequently been questioned by their enemies and those
unacquainted with them. When the war of the Rebellion broke out, the
Saints again manifested their loyalty to the Union. When the telegraph
line across the continent was completed, in October, 1861, President
Brigham Young was courteously tendered the privilege of sending the first
message from Salt Lake City. It was to the president of the telegraph
company, Mr. J. H. Wade, as follows:
“Sir: Permit me to congratulate you upon the
completion of the Overland Telegraph Lines west to this city, to commend
the energy displayed by yourself and associates in the rapid and
successful prosecution of a work so beneficial; and to express the wish
that its use may ever tend to promote the true interests of the dwellers
upon both the Atlantic and Pacific slopes of our continent.“Utah has not seceded, but is firm for the
Constitution and laws of our once happy country, and is warmly
interested in such useful enterprises as the one so far completed.”
In making his reply, President Wade expressed gratitude
to President Young, that his, the first message to pass over the line,
“should express so unmistakably the patriotism and union-loving
sentiments” of himself and people.
In April, 1862, President Lincoln requested President
Brigham Young to raise a force of cavalry to guard the overland route,
which was promptly done. Before the request came, the offer was made by
President Young to protect that route.
Moreover, while many states were endeavoring to get out
of the Union, the “Mormons” were petitioning Congress to get in. This
privilege of state government was denied them. The denial was very largely
due to the hostile attitude of the new officials, Governor Stephen S.
Harding, and two of the territorial judges, Charles B. Waite and Thomas J.
Drake, who were decidedly unfriendly to the people of the territory.
Other reasons given were the general feeling of
opposition to the faith of the Latter-day Saints—especially against
the practice of plural marriage, and the belief, which still erroneously
persisted, that they were disloyal. “An un-American condition of affairs
was supposed to exist here,” so writes Orson F. Whitney, “hostile to the
Government and subversive of morality and civilization. Priestcraft,
polygamy, and murder were thought to be the chief cornerstones of
‘Mormonism.’ A union of Church and State was alleged. It was charged that
the ‘Mormon’ people were under the sway of an ecclesiastical despotism
which ‘overshadowed and controlled their opinions, actions, property, and
lives, penetrating and supervising social and business circles, and
requiring implicit obedience to the counsel of the Church, as a duty
paramount to all the obligations of morality, society, allegiance and
law.’”1
Notes
Whitney’s Popular History of Utah, page 183.
Chapter 46
The “Anti-Bigamy Law”
Instead of granting statehood in answer to the petition
of the people of Utah, Congress passed an “anti-bigamy law” in opposition
to the practice of plural marriage. It was presented to the house of
representatives by Justin R. Morrill of Vermont, but was instigated by
Governor Harding and Judges Waite and Drake. The bill—the first of
the kind to be placed on the statutes—was signed by President
Lincoln, July 8, 1862. It defined plural marriage as bigamy, and made the
contracting of such a marriage punishable by a fine of five hundred
dollars and imprisonment for a term of five years. This law was considered
by many leading attorneys and others not “Mormons,” as being
unconstitutional. It was not enforced, President Lincoln’s policy being to
let the “Mormons” alone. Among the features which helped to make it
inoperative was the provision, aimed at the Church, forbidding religious
bodies in territories to hold real estate in value to exceed fifty
thousand dollars. An effort was made by Governor Harding, in 1863, to have
Brigham Young punished under this law. He was taken before Judge Kinney
and placed under bonds, but the grand jury failed to take action and the
case was dropped.
Attempted Legislation Against the “Mormons”
The governor and two judges went even further in their
desire to obtain legislation effecting the citizens of Utah. They entered
into a conspiracy to have removed many powers vested in the loyal officers
and place them under federal control. Among these changes they proposed
that Congress limit the powers of the county courts to the probating of
wills, issuing titles of administration and guardianship; place in the
hands of the United States marshal the power to summon jurors as he might
think proper—a thing that would have proved very disadvantageous to
the Saints—and give the governor full power to appoint all the
officers of the militia, and designate the days when the companies should
drill. When this proposed legislation was presented in Congress and it was
learned who the authors were, it caused great indignation in Utah. A mass
meeting was held and the guilty officials were asked to resign, which they
refused to do. A petition was sent to Washington asking for their removal
and for the appointment of “good men in their stead.” A counter petition
was sent from the companies of California volunteers, who were stationed
at the time in the valley. While the people did not get all they asked
for, the governor was removed and James Duane Doty, superintendent of
Indian affairs in the territory, and a much better man, was chosen in his
place.
The California Volunteers
Very soon after the departure of Johnston’s army, the
people of Utah were inflicted with the presence of other troops. These
were volunteers from California and Nevada, about seven hundred strong,
who were detained in Salt Lake City, as they were on their way to the East
to take part in the Civil War. They were under the command of Colonel
(later General) Patrick Edward Connor, who greatly desired to take active
part in the war. He was a man whose loyalty to the United States was of
the highest order. When he was commanded to stay in Utah, he was
exceedingly disappointed. Secretary of War Edward Stanton—who was
extremely distrustful of the “Mormons”—stationed Colonel Connor at
Salt Lake City ostensibly to guard the telegraph and mail route, but more
particularly to watch the “Mormons.” Connor established his headquarters
on the foothills east of Salt Lake City, naming the place Camp Douglas, in
honor of Stephen A. Douglas. He was extremely prejudiced against the
Latter-day Saints, and lost no occasion to manifest his bitter feelings in
public or in private; so obsessed was he that “no good thing could come
out of Utah.” Every word, every action of the “Mormons,” was falsely
interpreted; and provocation given by him to antagonize the leaders of the
Church whom he considered to be disloyal.
The Union Vedette
Under his direction an anti-“Mormon” paper edited by
Captain Charles H. Hempstead was published at Camp Douglas and later in
the city. It was called the Union Vedette, the
mission of which was to fight “Mormonism.” Connor also attempted to
establish military rule instead of civil authority, thus depriving the
citizens of their rights.
Mining in Utah
To Patrick E. Connor is given credit for starting the
mining industry in Utah. His motives, however, were not entirely
commendable. If he is to be judged by his own words, his main purpose was
not to “get gain” or to increase the circulation of the precious metals,
but to cause an influx of “a large Gentile and loyal population sufficient
by peaceful means and through the ballot-box to overwhelm the Mormons by
mere force of numbers, and thus wrest from the Church—disloyal and
traitorous to the core—the absolute and tyrannical control of
temporal and civil affairs.”
He was acquainted with the fact that President Young had
advised the Saints to develop the industries of agriculture and establish
needful factories that they might be self-sustaining, and leave mining
alone for later consideration. This advice was very wise, for in the days
of pioneer life, and when the commonwealth was young, it was necessary
that the people be able to support themselves. They could not live on gold
and silver, but they could on the products of the soil; and they could
keep warm from the spinning of wool and the manufacture of cloth out of
which to make their clothing. The advice of President Young was the advice
which governed the Pilgrims when they landed on the shores of America; but
it seemed to be very distasteful and unpatriotic to men of little souls.
All goods brought to the territory from abroad, before the advent of the
railroad, had to be hauled by team upwards of a thousand miles, and with
the constantly increasing population, all hands were needed to labor in
producing what the people consumed. Even then, for a long time it was a
difficult task, for several years were extremely lean due to the ravages
of grasshoppers and crickets, and because of other obstacles unforeseen.
If the Saints had run off to develop mines, they would
have sealed their own doom in the days of their pioneering. Moreover, the
experience of the past, in 1849 and subsequently, when the California gold
rush was on, taught them that the development of the mining industry would
bring to the territory the riffraff and scum of humanity. This would mean
the increase of crime and decrease of law and order.
Why the Latter-day Saints Settled in Utah
The Latter-day Saints came to the valleys of the
mountains primarily to worship the Lord and to keep his commandments; also
to develop a peaceful commonwealth where others of their faith might be
gathered to enjoy the fruits of their labors without molestation.
The False Attitude of General Connor
The attitude of General Connor, and all who agreed with
him, was basely false. Brigham Young was not opposed to the development of
mines, but he was farsighted enough to understand—which many of his
petty critics could not understand—that there were other duties more
important and substantial, which held precedence, at least in the lives of
the Latter-day Saints, in the development of the territory. It should be
said to the credit of General Patrick E. Connor, who manifested so much
bitterness in the early sixties, that after remaining in Utah for several
years, his feelings towards the “Mormon” people greatly softened. When it
did become possible for a ray of light and truth to penetrate his
prejudices, he discovered that the Latter-day Saints were not such
disloyal citizens after all.
Inspiration of Brigham Young
President Brigham Young was a practical man by nature,
but, aided by the inspiration of the Spirit of the Lord, his wisdom in the
establishment of cities, villages, and industries, was far beyond his
human possibilities. On many an occasion when the settlers of a selected
site had chosen the low lands near the center of the valleys, he
instructed them to move higher up near the foothills; and at times against
their judgment settlers were advised to move to less favorable looking
land than that which they had chosen. Time has proved that their leader
was possessed of the inspiration which he was entitled to receive.
Home Industries
From the very beginning of Utah’s history, President
Young taught the people the necessity of establishing home industries and
becoming self supporting. In these various ventures, he invariably took
the lead. In the very earliest times, he advocated the cultivation of
cotton in the “Dixie” land; the building of mills and factories; the
harnessing of the mountain streams for power; and the development of the
natural resources of the country which would be of material benefit to the
people. His discourses were not confined to spiritual themes, but were
ofttimes devoted to the building of roads and fences, the cultivation of
the soil, the planting of vineyards and orchards, the raising of sheep and
cattle, and all other useful things which would tend to encourage the
members of the Church in obtaining temporal blessings, that they might
live in comfort and prosperity. Had the people always followed his advice,
it would have been better for them.
Plotters Against the Peace
Due to the malicious activities of many territorial
officials, and the constant desire on the part of others not of the Church
who came to Utah, to “civilize” and “reform” the Latter-day Saints,
feelings of unfriendliness existed between members of the Church and
“outsiders.” The continued attacks made by General Connor and Captain
Hempstead, the editor of the Union Vedette, upon
the Church and its authorities, had a tendency to increase this feeling.
During, and after the close of the Civil War, Utah was infested with a set
of characters who seemed determined to make trouble. The “Gentile”
population at that time was about three hundred, the majority of whom were
honorable citizens, but among them were to be found many bitter enemies of
the Church, bent upon its destruction. Some of the latter had gone into
business hoping to receive the patronage of the Latter-day Saints, but at
the same time they were plotting against the Church, which they bitterly
hated.
The Killing of Brassfield
To add to the unfortunate condition which divided the
people, there occurred in Salt Lake City, in 1866, two shocking murders.
The first of these was the killing of S. Newton Brassfield, a freighter,
who came to Utah from Nevada. He induced a plural wife to forsake her
husband while the husband was in the mission field. Brassfield then
married the woman, the ceremony being performed by Judge Solomon P.
McCurdy of the Supreme Court of Utah. It was stated on good authority that
Brassfield had deserted his wife and family before he came to Utah. This
charge was denied by some of his defenders but strongly affirmed by
individuals who claimed to speak from personal knowledge. One evening in
April, as he was entering his boarding house, he was shot and killed by
some person who made his escape in the dark and was never discovered.
The Robinson Murder
The second killing was that of Dr. J. King Robinson who
was decoyed from his home, one night in October, under the pretext that
his professional services were needed. A short distance from his home he
was set upon by a band of ruffians and severely beaten and then killed.
The motive for the crime remains a mystery. Dr. Robinson had been in
controversy with the city corporation over property, but the matter had
been settled by the supreme court of Utah in favor of the city and could
not have been the basis for the murder. It is presumed by some that his
assailants did not intend to take his life, but merely administer to him a
severe beating for some personal or fancied wrong; but being recognized,
they determined on killing him for their protection.
According to the custom of the times, the attempt was
made to fasten the responsibility for these murders upon the authorities
of the Church. Such accusations were openly made by prominent attorneys at
the investigation of the Robinson murder. Naturally President Young was
indignant, and challenged his traducers to produce their proof. He was
ready to go to court, be examined, and have the most thorough
investigation made that the country could furnish. He denounced the crime
as on a par with the killing of Joseph and Hyrum Smith, the Haun’s Mill
massacre and the tragedy at Mountain Meadows. Rewards were offered for the
arrest, by the city, the county, and by private subscription, amounting to
the sum of nine thousand dollars. President Young headed the list with
five hundred dollars. When the effort failed to connect the authorities of
the Church with the crime, the ardor of some who had been most insistent
that the guilty parties be punished, cooled considerably and they lost
interest in the case.
General Sherman to Brigham Young
Following the Brassfield killing, reports were sent out
through the country blaming the homicide on the “Mormon” people. General
William T. Sherman, then stationed at St. Louis, wired President Brigham
Young stating that “responsible officers” had informed him that four
“Gentiles” had been murdered by “Mormons.” As Utah was under his military
jurisdiction, he declared that he was bound to give protection to all
citizens and murders must be punished and wrongs avenged, if “committed
against any American citizens even in remote Utah.”
President Young’s Answer
In replying to General Sherman’s telegram, President
Young thanked him for the opportunity of presenting the facts. He said,
dispatches sent from Utah to the East were not reliable; there had been no
such assassinations as the General had been led to believe. “On May 17, a
soldier shot a gentleman named Mayfield, and a Mr. Brassfield came home
and seduced a Mormon’s wife, and was shot on the street by some unknown
person; but neither I nor the community at large knew any more about it
than an inhabitant of St. Louis. Citizens who are not of our faith do not
suffer from intimidation here. In no other communities could men pursue
the course many do here without experiencing the vengeance of a vigilance
committee.” President Young closed his telegram as follows: “There are a
few speculators here who are anxious to make it appear that American
citizens’ lives are in danger through religious fanaticism, hoping thereby
to have troops sent here to make money out of contracts. Gentiles’ lives
are as safe here as ‘Mormons’ and acts of violence occur more rarely in
this city than any other of its size in any of the new States or
Territories.”
Citizens of Utah to General Sherman
Another telegram was sent by prominent “Gentile”
citizens of Utah, confirming the telegram of President Young. Among the
signers were some of the leading business men and officers from Camp
Douglas. General Sherman replied to President Young as follows: “Sir: Your
dispatch is received and I am much gratified at its substance and spirit.”
A Proposed “Gentile” Exodus
Due to the bitterness existing in Utah, President
Brigham Young counseled the “Mormon” people not to patronize business
institutions which were run by the enemies of the people. This was as a
matter of self-defence and preservation. The result of this counsel was
that a communication from “Gentile” merchants and addressed to the Church
authorities, was received in which they agreed to leave the territory on
certain conditions. Their conditions were as follows: The Church would
guarantee the payment of their outstanding accounts owing to them by the
members of the Church, and the purchase of their merchandise, chattles,
houses, improvements, etc., at a cash valuation, after a deduction of
twenty-five per cent had been made from the total amount. “To the
fulfilment of the above,” said they, “we hold ourselves ready at any time,
to enter into negotiations, and on final arrangement being made and terms
of sale complied with, we shall freely leave the Territory.”
President Young Answers the Merchants
In a signed communication dated Dec. 21, 1866, President
Young declined to entertain their offer. He kindly pointed out to them
that if they could secure such sales, they would make more money than
merchants had ever made before, and perhaps “Mormon” merchants would like
to sell out on the same kind of terms. They were at liberty to remain or
go, just as they pleased; no intimidation or coercion had been used in the
community to have them stop trading with any class, and no man had been
ostracised because he was not of the “Mormon” faith. Every man who had
dealt fairly and honestly, and confined his attention to his legitimate
business, whatever his creed, had found friendship among the Latter-day
Saints. “To be adverse to Gentiles, or Jews, because they are Jews,” said
President Young, “is in direct opposition to the genius of our religion.
It matters not what a man’s creed is . . . he will receive
kindness and friendship from us, and we have not the least objection to
doing business with him; if in his dealings he acts in accordance with the
principles of right and deport himself as a good, law-abiding citizen
should.”
Attention was called to the fact that there were those
doing business in the territory who for years had been the avowed enemies
of the community. The disrupture and overthrow of the Church had been the
object of their labors. “Missionaries of evil, there have been no arts too
base, no stratagems too vile for them to use to bring about their
nefarious ends,” said President Young. While soliciting the patronage of
the people, from whom they drew their support, they had used their means
thus derived “in the most shameless and abandoned manner,” to destroy the
very people whose favor they found it to their interest to court. They had
“fostered vice and vicious institutions to oppose the unanimously
expressed will of the people, to increase disorder, and to change the city
from a condition of peace and quietude to lawless anarchy.” The question
was asked what claims such persons could have upon the patronage of the
community, and what community on the earth “would be so besotted as to
uphold and foster men whose aim is to destroy them.” In closing his
epistle, President Young declared: “It is to oppose these men whom I have
described, and to these alone that I am opposed, and I am determined to
use my influence to have the citizens here stop dealing with them and deal
with honorable men.”
Two days later in a discourse before the Saints,
President Young said: “We advise you to pass by the shops and stores of
your enemies and let them alone, but give your means into the hands of men
who are honest men, honorable men, and upright men—men who will deal
justly and truly with all. Shall we deal with the Jew? Yes. With those who
call themselves Gentiles? Certainly. We calculate to continue to deal with
them.”1
Building of the Tabernacle
In 1867 the Salt Lake Tabernacle which was begun in
1863, was completed. It is one of the most remarkable buildings in the
world. The building is elliptical in shape and is one hundred and fifty
feet wide and two hundred and fifty feet in length. The roof is a
self-supporting wooden structure, which was originally fastened together
without nails, wooden pins and rawhide being used in lieu thereof. It
rests upon buttresses of red sandstone set about twelve feet apart. The
acoustic powers are marvelous. The building also contains a pipe organ
which was the largest in the world, when built. The organ was originally
the work of Joseph Ridges, of Salt Lake City, and was made out of native
timber. Since the time of its construction it has been remodeled and kept
in constant repair.
The October Conference 1867
The October Conference of the Church in 1867, was held
in the new Tabernacle which was nearing completion. On this occasion one
hundred and sixty-three persons were called to go and strengthen the
settlements in southern Utah, and the Saints were called on to assist in
the gathering of the poor from Great Britain and other foreign lands.
Elder Joseph F. Smith, son of Patriarch Hyrum Smith, was called to fill a
vacancy in the council of the twelve, caused by the apostasy of Amasa M.
Lyman.
The Deseret Telegraph
At a special conference of the Church held April 10,
1865, it was agreed to build a telegraph line throughout the settlements
in Utah. The members of the Church were called upon to assist in this
worthy undertaking. Between the years 1865 and 1867, five hundred miles of
line were constructed at a cost of one hundred and fifty dollars per mile.
This placed the principal settlements of the territory in ready
communication with Salt Lake City. Towns in Idaho and Nevada were also
reached. By means of this telegraph line, the authorities of the Church
—for it was a Church enterprise—were able to facilitate their
business and save many miles of weary travel and great expense, in the
forwarding of instructions to the people. This line remained under the
control of the Church until 1900, when it was merged into the Western
Union System.
Death of President Heber C. Kimball
President Heber C. Kimball, first counselor to President
Brigham Young, died in Salt Lake City, June 22, 1868. He was one of the
original members called into the council of the twelve, and the “father”
of the British Mission. President Kimball was greatly blessed with the
spirit of prophecy; was bold and fearless, and never faltered in his
integrity to the truth.
At the general conference in October, George A. Smith of
the council of the twelve, and cousin of the Prophet Joseph and Patriarch
Hyrum Smith, was chosen and sustained to fill the vacancy in the First
Presidency. Brigham Young Jr., was sustained as one of the apostles,
succeeding Elder Smith in that body.
The Coming of the Railroad
Another great change in Utah was brought to pass in the
completion of the trans-continental railway. The railroad, together with
the telegraph which spanned the country from sea to sea, brought the
people of the territory in closer communication with the outside world.
Isolation of the people of the Great Basin was now a thing of the past.
Under the direction of President Young, much of the grading, especially
from Echo Canyon to Ogden, the most difficult part of the way, was done by
members of the Church. The last spike uniting the East and the West with
bands of steel, was driven at the junction of the two roads—the
Central Pacific and the Union Pacific—at Promontory, Utah, May 10,
1869. There was assembled on that occasion a great concourse of people,
numbering eleven hundred souls. The officials of both roads, and many
leading men, including newspaper representatives from all parts of the
country, had come by train from East and West to witness this wonderful
epoch in our American history.
The Utah Local Lines
The trans-continental railways passed through Ogden.
When it was contemplated that Salt Lake City would not be on the line,
President Young remarked: “If the company which first arrives should deem
it to their advantage to leave us out in the cold, we will not be so far
off, but we can have a branch line for the advantage of this city.” The
same day that the Union Pacific road finished laying rails in Ogden there
was organized in Salt Lake City, the Utah Central Railway. This road and
subsequently other local roads in Utah, were promoted by President Young
and other members of the Church. In May, 1869, ground was broken,
President Young removing the first earth, and the last spike on this road
between Salt Lake City and Ogden was driven January 10, 1870. The Utah
Central Railway connected Salt Lake City with the outside world, and
proved to all people, that there was no desire on the part of the
Latter-day Saints to be exclusive and isolated from their fellowmen. No
longer were immigrants to come by handcart and ox-team.
Proposed Anti-“Mormon” Legislation
The unfavorable attitude of certain merchants and others
towards the Church naturally resulted in a movement for self-protection.
The coming of the railroad was looked upon by the enemies of the
Latter-day Saints as a means by which the “redemption” of the territory
from “Mormon” dominion was to be brought to pass. They declared with a
feeling of delight that when Utah was connected with the outside world by
rail, there would come such an influx of “Gentiles” that the “Mormon”
population would be overwhelmed. There were many open threats, and that
too, by officials, that when that time should come there would be
instituted a crusade against the members of the Church to deprive them of
their liberties. The Saints were wrongfully accused of being opposed to
the coming of the railroad because they feared such a result. The fact,
however, was that President Young and the presiding brethren did all in
their power to have the road pass through Salt Lake City rather than
Ogden. Mass meetings were held and every endeavor made to accomplish this
purpose, and when it failed, President Young headed a movement, as stated,
to make connection by building a railroad from Salt Lake City to Ogden.
The Wade and Cragin Bills
Nor did these individuals who opposed the Church wait
for the coming of the railroad to commence their determined effort to
deprive the people of their inherent rights. Appeals were made to
Congress, and bills, having their origin within the territory, were
presented intended to curtail the liberties of the people. In 1866 a
measure was presented, known as the Wade Bill, providing for the
destruction of local government in the territory. This was followed by the
Cragin Bill in 1869, following the same lines, but still more drastic. The
intent of these measures was to place in the hands of the governor the
sole power to appoint and commission all the local officers in the
territory, and remove the people from a voice in government. All juries,
grand and petit, were to be selected by the United States marshal. For a
“Mormon” minister to solemnize a marriage was to be a criminal act, the
property of the Church, excepting twenty thousand dollars, was to be
taxed, and the Church be denied from making rules and regulations
respecting fellowship of its members. The governor of the territory was to
become the financial head of the Church, though not a member, and the
trustee-in-trust, under heavy penalty of fine and imprisonment, was
required to make full and complete and annual reports to that individual
accounting for “all Church properties, moneys in banks, notes, deposits
with the Church,” etc. All this, and more, was contemplated in free
America where “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” are guaranteed
as inalienable rights.
The Cullom Bill
A few days later another bill just as radical in its
features was presented in Congress by Shelby M. Cullom, of Illinois, and
was substituted for the Cragin Bill by consent of Mr. Cragin. This measure
was prepared by Robert N. Baskin of Salt Lake City, one of the most bitter
and inconsiderate enemies ever arrayed against the Church. Fortunately for
the Latter-day Saints, none of these measures were at the time enacted
into law.
Co-operation for Defense
The attitude of local anti-“Mormons,” coupled with the
proposed unfavorable and inhuman legislation, naturally drove the members
of the Church closer together. It was proposed in self-protection that
there be organized throughout the various settlements a chain of
co-operative stores, and that the people trade with each other rather than
with their enemies. And if the proposed threats were to be fulfilled, the
enemies of the Church who came to Utah to do business would have to bring
their customers with them, for the Saints would not patronize them. Based
upon this proposition a parent institution was established in Salt Lake
City, in which all the “Mormon” people were invited to take stock. This
commercial house, known as Zion’s Co-operative Mercantile Institution,
opened its doors for business in 1869, and the following year was
incorporated. In a circular announcing their intentions it was stated by
the brethren that they were “convinced of the impolicy of leaving the
trade and commerce of the territory to the conduct of strangers,” and
therefore “it was advisable that the people of Utah should become their
own merchants” and “unite in a system of co-operation for the transaction
of their own business.” In this way there could be a consolidation of the
mercantile stores in which all the people might be interested, and receive
their merchandise based on a small margin of profit. Branches were
established in nearly every settlement and were beneficial to the people
while that condition lasted.
A Change of Feeling
Fortunately there has been a change of feeling in the
land and the necessity for such a movement has departed. However, while
the full object of the co-operative movement was not accomplished it was a
factor for the leveling of prices and the destruction of what has been
spoken of so commonly in later years—the “profiteer.” Before the
advent of this great institution there were merchants in the land who
endeavored from time to time to “corner the market” on certain
necessities, and then charge exorbitant prices for their goods. This, of
course, could not be accomplished when a large institution, established in
the interests of the people, endeavored to protect their interests. The
principle of co-operation, no matter where applied, is right, and should
be encouraged; but many of these local institutions passed out of
existence through the lack of interest on the part of many of the people,
who disposed of their stock to other and more enterprising individuals,
until the system was destroyed.2
Protest of “Mormon” Women Against Legislation
Early in January, 1870, a number of meetings were held
by the women in various communities in protest against the pending
legislation (the Cragin and Cullom bills) in Congress affecting
“Mormonism.” On the 13th of the month a mass meeting of several thousand
“Mormon” women was held in the tabernacle. Great enthusiasm pervaded the
gathering. While they opposed all the features of the anti-“Mormon”
legislation, their action was principally in protest against the measures,
and the remarks of would-be reformers, in which the women of the Church
were spoken of as being “down-trodden” and “degraded” by their
husband-oppressors. Sarah M. Kimball, president of the Relief Society of
the Fifteenth Ward, presided at the meeting. Stating the object of the
gathering she said, “We are not here to advocate woman’s rights, but man’s
rights. The bill in question would not only deprive our fathers, husbands
and brothers of the privilege bequeathed to citizens of the United States,
but it would also deprive us, as women, of the privilege of selecting our
husbands, and against this we unqualifiedly protest.” Similar remarks of
protest were made by several prominent women and a set of resolutions were
unanimously and enthusiastically adopted; among them the following:
“Resolved, That we, the ladies of Salt Lake City, in
mass-meeting assembled, do manifest our indignation, and protest against
the bill before Congress, known as ‘the Cullom Bill,’ also the one known
as ‘the Cragin Bill,’ and all similar bills, expressions and manifestoes.“Resolved, That we consider the above named bills foul
blots on our national escutcheon—absurd documents—atrocious
insults to the honorable executive of the United States Government, and
malicious attempts to subvert the right of civil and religious liberty.
. . .“Resolved, That we acknowledge the institutions of the
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints as the only reliable
safeguard of female virtue and innocence; and the only sure protection
against the fearful sin of prostitution, and its attendant evils, now
prevalent abroad, and as such, we are and shall be united with our
brethren in sustaining them against each and every encroachment.”
Many other meetings of this nature were held in other
settlements in protest against the passage of these bills, which caused
great surprise and astonishment throughout the nation.
Woman Suffrage
According to the doctrines of the Church, woman has
always been granted the privilege of a voice in the affairs of the
organization. All matters of importance as well as the sustaining of the
various officers, are regularly presented to the membership—women
and men alike—for their suffrage, or vote. The Church gave to its
women the first exclusively women’s organization in all the world; and it
was representatives of this organization in mass-meeting assembled, who
entered their vigorous protest against the pending legislation which was
intended to affect them seriously in their lives.
Within about one month from the time of this meeting of
protest, the legislature of Utah passed an act granting to the women of
the territory the right of franchise which became a law by the approval of
Acting Governor S. A. Mann. Such privileges granted to the women had
previously been proposed by those opposed to “Mormonism,” who thought that
the women were oppressed and this would be a means of redeeming them from
“the galling yoke” under which they were “oppressed.”
“The New Movement”
In the fall of 1869 a number of prominent elders were
excommunicated for apostasy, by the high council of the Salt Lake Stake.
Among the number were William S. Godbe, Elias L. T. Harrison, Eli B.
Kelsey, and later Henry W. Lawrence, Thomas B. H. Stenhouse and
others. Mr. Godbe was a merchant, and a prominent member of one of the
quorums of Seventy as was also Mr. Harrison, whose business was that of an
architect. Eli B. Kelsey had performed good and faithful service in the
mission field abroad, until through immoral transgression he lost the
spirit of the work. These men had become disaffected for various causes
and now opposed many of the policies of President Young. They accused him
of trying to set up in the Church a “Young dynasty,” and of being guilty
of “one man power,” and they rebelled against his teaching regarding the
opening of the mines and the establishment of mercantile institutions. Mr.
Harrison, a gifted writer, had been editing the Utah
Magazine which now became the organ of the disaffected brethren.
These men still claimed to believe in much of “Mormonism” but centered
their attack on President Young, publishing articles reflecting upon him
by comparison and innuendo. At first they declared they would set up an
organization of their own—a new Church—retaining all the good
features of “Mormonism” and discarding all that were bad. A presiding
officer and apostles were to be chosen, and the Church was to be
“redeemed” from the sad condition into which these disaffected persons
claimed it had fallen. This attempt at “reformation” is known in history
as “the New Movement,” or the “Godbeite Movement,” because of the
prominent part William S. Godbe played in it; but they called it “The
Church of Zion.” For a time they held meetings in the Thirteenth Ward, by
permission of President Young; but the organization which was without a
head, and as Elder Whitney says, “with very little body,” soon passed away.
Organization of the Liberal Party
Desiring some organization in which “Mormonism” might be
opposed, these excommunicated members joined with the anti-“Mormons” of
the territory in the formation of a political party, the object of which
was to fight the Church. “The Liberal Political Party,” as it was called,
was organized in February, 1870. From that time forth until the
organization was dissolved in the nineties, it carried on an unscrupulous
warfare against the Church. Those who controlled its destiny were guilty
of the most bitter and relentless actions that could be imagined.
Misrepresentation, falsehood and deceit were the chief weapons of attack;
and by such methods the name of the Church was maligned and its officers
placed in a false light before the world. The history of this political
organization is almost without a parallel, at least nothing like it has
ever occurred elsewhere in free republican America; only as it has been
produced by those opposed to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day
Saints in these valleys of the mountains. Nothing like it would be
tolerated anywhere else in all the world.
The Salt Lake Tribune
In January, 1870, the “Godbeites” commenced publishing a
paper which they called the Mormon Tribune; it
was the Utah Magazine, transformed, and was
published in the interest of their movement. Dropping the word “Mormon” it
became the organ of the Liberal Party, and the following year passed into
other hands more vicious. “Its only principle, apparently, was hatred of
everything Mormon,” writes Historian Whitney, “in pursuance of which it
spared neither age, sex nor condition; emptying the vials of its venom
upon all who dared to differ from it, misrepresenting their motives,
assailing their characters, and libeling and lampooning both the living
and the dead. Its columns were not only filled habitually with falsehood,
but often with vulgar and obscene scandals. Many who helped to sustain the
paper either from sympathy with its assaults upon Mormonism, or from fear
of being abused by it and called ‘Jack-Mormons’ if they withheld their
support, were careful to have it delivered at their down-town offices, and
would not have it in their homes for their wives and daughters to read, so
filthy at times were its contents. The Nauvoo
Expositor was holy writ compared with the Salt Lake Tribune.3 It had been justly said of this sheet
that it was “brought into the world to lie and was true to its mission.”
Notes
The Gentile merchants were scarcely complimentary to the intelligence
of President Young when they made this proposition to withdraw from the
Territory on the conditions named by them. If the Gentile claim that there
was utter incompatibility between Mormon and non-Mormon in Utah could have
been emphasized by a spectacular exodus of Gentile merchants from Utah,
however brought about, it doubtless would have given occasion for another
Utah expedition to the Territory or such other military display as would
have inured to the benefit of speculators, contractors, and merchants, or
to the long-hoped-for further prescription of the Latter-day Saints.
Surely the Gentile merchants should have known if their action had such
motive as this, that Brigham Young would have detected it; and if not, if
their proposed exodus was honest and meant only that they intended to
withdraw from an unpleasant situation, to end merely in their personal
advantage, then they should have known that Brigham Young would know that
the people of the United States would read into the facts of the exodus
all the evidence they would need of the alleged incompatibility, to
justify, from their viewpoint, all the coercive measures against the
Mormon community for which their enemies were clamoring. Brigham Young
could not fail to apprehend the danger, and accordingly avoid it (History of the Mormon Church, ch. 106, p. 464, B. H.
Roberts).
As early as 1864 a co-operative movement was inaugurated in Brigham
City by Elder Lorenzo Snow. It was attended with success and grew into a
flourishing institution which existed for a number of years. Other
ventures preceding the establishment of Z.C.M.I.—as the great parent
institution is generally called—were established at Lehi, American
Fork and other towns, in 1868.
History of Utah, vol. 2:380–1.
Chapter 47
Governor Shaffer
Following the removal of Governor Harding in 1863, Utah
was blessed for a time with the presence of governors who were inclined to
attend to the duties of their office without much interference with
“Mormonism.” Governors James Duane Doty and Charles Durkee had held the
office and S. A. Mann, secretary of the territory, served as acting
governor following the resignation of Governor Durkee in 1869, until the
appointee of President Ulysses S. Grant arrived in the territory in the
spring of 1870. This was J. Wilson Shaffer of Illinois, who proved to be
the most bitter and bigoted anti-“Mormon” governor Utah ever had. He was
in his forty-third year when he came to Utah, and was suffering from
consumption, contracted while serving in the Civil War. He was a man of
determined will, and evidently was sincere in his conviction that the
“Mormons” were more than “rebels,” who needed the drastic treatment which
by some was considered proper and necessary treatment for the South,
during the days of reconstruction. He came to Utah with a bias against the
Latter-day Saints which nothing short of a miracle could remove. “Never
after me, by ——,” said he, “shall it be said Brigham Young is
governor of Utah.” In this expression he displayed his ignorance of the
conditions in Utah—a mistake made by many others—that because
the Latter-day Saints hearkened to the counsels of President Young who, as
their inspired leader, directed them as members of the Church, he was
usurping the prerogatives of the executive. If these men had been broad
enough they might have seen that President Young respected the civil
authority at all times, even when sorely abused and tried by the petty
acts of presumptuous and bigoted officials, who did all in their power to
annoy and humiliate him before the people.
Removal of Secretary Mann and Judge Wilson
The anger of Governor Shaffer was kindled against
Secretary Mann because he, as acting governor, signed the woman suffrage
bill and endeavored to show some just consideration for the majority of
the people. Likewise he displayed feelings of resentment against Chief
Justice Charles A. Wilson because he would not subvert the law in favor of
the anti-“Mormon” “ring” to the disadvantage of the people. Wilson was
accused of exercising too much leniency towards the “Mormons,” so he, like
Secretary Mann, was removed through the influence of the governor.
The Coming of Judge McKean
To succeed the deposed officials, Vernon H. Vaughan was
sent to Utah as secretary of the territory and Judge James B. McKean to be
chief justice. O. F. Strickland and C. M. Hawley were also
appointed associate justices to fill vacancies which existed. Judge
McKean, like Governor Shaffer, was a relentless anti-“Mormon,” bigoted and
narrow. He came to Utah with a “mission,” said he, “as high above my mere
duty as a judge, as the heaven is above the earth.” That “mission” was the
overthrow of “Mormonism.” However, Judge McKean is gone, and “Mormonism”
still survives and prospers.
Influence on Schuyler Colfax and Rev. Newman
The appointment of these bigoted and narrow-souled
officials was largely due to the influence of Vice-President Schuyler
Colfax and Rev. John P. Newman. The former had visited Utah on two
occasions; first in 1865, when he was speaker of the house of
representatives, and again in 1869, when he was holding the office of
vice-president in the administration of U. S. Grant. He was
associated with an organized “ring” of anti-“Mormon” agitators and
politicians, who were bent on the destruction of “Mormon” dominion in
Utah. On each visit he had shown marked opposition to the Church. Rev.
Newman was President Grant’s minister, and was also chaplain of the United
States Senate.
Governor Shaffer and the Militia
By act of the Utah Legislature in 1852, the militia,
under the title of the “Nauvoo Legion,” met in annual muster. In keeping
with the law, Lieutenant General Daniel H. Wells issued an order August
16, 1870, calling for a three days’ muster, for the purpose of inspection,
drill and camp duty. Governor Shaffer was absent from the territory at the
time, but as soon as he returned he issued a counter order forbidding any
muster, or drill, or gathering of any military organization within the
territory, except upon his orders. He also illegally appointed Patrick E.
Connor major general of the militia, and William N. Johns, colonel and
assistant adjutant general, and directed that all arms and munitions
belonging to the territory, or to the United States, then in possession of
the militia, be delivered to Colonel Johns, without delay. Through
misrepresentation, the government had sent troops to Utah to act as “a
moral force” in protecting Gentiles and apostates. The action of the
governor practically destroyed the militia, and by aid of the government
troops, he endeavored to establish a military power to intimidate the
Latter-day Saints, and lessen the power of the “Mormon” leaders.
Request of General Wells
Against this high-handed outrage, General Wells wrote,
requesting the governor to suspend his order until the 20th of November to
enable Adjutant General Hiram B. Clawson to make a complete report
according to law, of the condition of the militia. Governor Shaffer
answered General Wells, October 27, 1870, in an insulting letter denying
the request. General Wells answered this attack in an open letter which
was published in the Deseret News.
The Provo Riot
The governor’s attitude in disregarding all local civil
law and authority, bore bitter fruit. The peace officers were rendered
helpless in the performance of their duties, and the rabid part of the
community manifested a spirit of contempt and defiance for the law. The
city ordinances were broken with impunity, and the violators were
protected by the governor and judges. The spirit prevailed among a certain
class that the “Mormons” had ruled in Utah long enough and it was stated
that the authorities at Washington were to make a change. There was to be
a revolution and the minority was to assume the reins of government.
One week after the governor’s proclamation disarming the
militia, a mob of about forty United States soldiers, who were stationed
at Fort Rawlins, near Provo, made a raid on that town. Late at night.
September 22, they went to the home of Alderman William Miller, fired
several shots into the building, smashed in the doors and windows, and
took Miller a prisoner. Similar rioting occurred at the homes of Alderman
Elijah F. Sheets and Counselor A. F. McDonald. The home of the latter
was ransacked and his substance scattered in the yard and street. The
doors and windows of the co-operative store, and those of the
meetinghouse, were broken, and the rioters attempted to burn the latter
building. Armed with needle guns they captured a number of citizens and
paraded them through the streets prodding them with their bayonets. The
reason for this deed was that the citizens of Provo had refused to sell
liquor to the troops.
Governor Shaffer’s Letter to General De Trobriand
Several days after the riot occurred Governor Shaffer
wrote to General De Trobriand, commander at Camp Douglas, censuring him
for the outrage and trying to place upon his shoulders the responsibility
for the raid, for which he was in no wise responsible. His command and
that at Fort Rawlins, were separate and distinct units. The general
answered the governor’s letter—which was evidently written for
political effect and to injure the commander because he had shown some
kindness to the “Mormon” people—with some sharpness, showing that
the governor and not the general had been derelict of duty. If the
governor expected to profit by his communication, which was evidently the
case for he gave it to the press before the general received it, very
little benefit was derived from it.
The Rioters Punished
The commander at Fort Rawlins, Major Osborne, as well as
General De Trobriand, greatly regretted the unfortunate and unprovoked
attack made by the soldiers. The matter was taken up in a proper way by
the military department of the Platte, and the guilty parties were duly
punished.
Death of Governor Shaffer
Monday, October 31, 1870, Governor J. Wilson Shaffer
died in Salt Lake City. He came to Utah in March and had served as
governor about seven months, but during that time had shown extreme
bitterness against the majority of the people in all his official acts.
The day of his death a dispatch came from Washington appointing Vernon H.
Vaughan, the territorial secretary, to succeed him, who in turn was
succeeded by George A. Black, as secretary. Mr. Black had been Governor
Shaffer’s private secretary.
“The Wooden Gun Rebellion”
In November, 1870, at the regular time for the military
musters, which had been prohibited by Governor Shaffer, about one hundred
men assembled on the Twentieth Ward Square, many of them carrying wooden
guns. Governor Vaughan was absent at the time and Secretary Black was
acting governor. He had eight of the men, viz: Andrew Burt, Charles R.
Savage, William G. Phillips, James Fennemore, Charles Livingston, George
M. Ottinger, Archibald Livingston and John C. Graham, arrested. They were
taken before Judge Hawley who bound them over to await the action of the
grand jury on the ground that it appeared that probably they had committed
a crime in disregarding Governor Shaffer’s order. They were placed under
heavy bonds, and as they refused to give bail, were given over to the
military authorities at Camp Douglas. They were kindly treated by the
officers and both “Mormon” and non-“Mormon” merchants looked after their
wants, furnishing them with many delicacies while they remained prisoners.
The grand jury, when it met, refused to indict them, and they were
released. This incident became popularly known as “The Wooden Gun
Rebellion.”
The Return of Martin Harris
August 30, 1870, Martin Harris, one of the three
witnesses to the Book of Mormon, arrived in Salt Lake City. He had been
absent from the Church since the days of Kirtland; but had never during
all those years denied his testimony. He now came back humbly to the
Church, and was baptized by Elder Edward Stevenson and confirmed by Elder
Orson Pratt. He died at Clarkston, Cache County, July 10, 1875, when
nearly ninety-three years of age. A few hours before his death he
discoursed on the Book of Mormon and reiterated the truth of the visit of
the angel and bore testimony to the divine origin of the Book of Mormon.
The Pratt-Newman Discussion
During the consideration of the Cullom Bill by Congress,
Rev. John P. Newman, pastor of the Metropolitan Methodist Church in
Washington, and chaplain of the senate, delivered a number of lectures
trying to prove that “God’s law condemns the union in marriage of more
than two persons.” His lectures were published in the New York Herald, and replies were made to them by Elder Orson
Pratt. It was suggested by Edward L. Sloan, acting editor of the Salt Lake
Daily Telegraph, a paper owned by “Gentile”
interests, that the reverend gentleman was wasting his ammunition by
preaching against plural marriage in Washington. It would be better for
him to come to Utah where the question was a live issue, and discuss the
issue with Orson Pratt, or some other “Mormon” elder. Mr. Newman,
construing this as a challenge from President Brigham Young, came to Utah
in the summer of 1870, armed cap-a-pie and with banners flying. He
immediately informed President Young that he was here to accept his
challenge to discuss the plural marriage question. President Young advised
him that he had issued no such challenge. After the exchange of a number
of spirited letters the reverend doctor issued a challenge to President
Young to discuss the question, “Does the Bible Sanction Polygamy?”
It was evidently notoriety and worldly applause Mr.
Newman was seeking, and he was quite surprised and disappointed when
President Young, in accepting the challenge, appointed Orson Pratt or John
Taylor, whichever Mr. Newman might prefer, to take his place in the
discussion. He came to meet the chief and not a subordinate. Nevertheless,
after some parleying the debate was held. Elder Orson Pratt taking the
affirmative of the question. The discussion began August 12, 1870, at 2
p.m. and continued during the two following days. Moderators were chosen,
but the merits of the discussion were left to the public to decide. The
press of the country took up the discussion, after the debate was over,
and the consensus of opinion throughout the land was that Elder Pratt had
proved too skilful for Dr. Newman.
Comments of the Press
The Washington correspondent of the New York Sun stated that the reverend doctor was “out of his depth”
in the discussion, and that it was “plain that the apostle carried too
many guns for the chaplain of the Senate.” The Boston
Banner of Light declared that “The Dr. Newman, who went forth from
Washington to Salt Lake City to take Mormonism by storm by flourishing his
Orthodox Bible in its face, has had to come away after a pretty severe
tilt with one of the leading elders, leaving his Bible behind him. Elder
Pratt took his Bible out of his hands and opened it again and again to
pages that taught and upheld the polygamy doctrine, reading off whole
volleys of historical texts that went to establish the leading Bible
characters, esteemed Saints by Orthodoxy, as regular Mormons. Dr. Newman
crawfished amazingly on this part of the argument and was at last rather
glad to abandon it to his Mormon opponent.” Other papers declared that
force alone could settle the “Mormon Question.”
Usurpation of Authority
What the anti-“Mormon” political “ring” failed to
accomplish by congressional enactment, they assumed to obtain through the
actions of the governor and the judges. Judge McKean and his colleagues
ignored the territorial laws enacted in 1852, which were still on the
statutes, and denied to the probate courts all jurisdiction except in
matters of probate. Likewise the duties of the territorial marshal and the
territorial attorney general had been taken from them and placed in the
hands of the United States marshal and the United States attorney. This,
however, was done before the coming of McKean, but he and his associates
confirmed that action. The result of these illegal proceedings was packed
juries, absurd and contradictory rulings, the law becoming a mockery and
justice a travesty.
The Englebrecht Case
August 27, 1870, three days before the arrival of Chief
Justice McKean, an incident occurred in Salt Lake City which was
ultimately to have much to do with the overthrow of his tyrannical and
fanatical power. This was the legal abatement by the police of a liquor
establishment conducted by Paul Englebrecht, Christian Rehemke and
Frederick Lutz. These men had been repeatedly fined for infraction of the
law; but on each occasion had appealed their case on the ground that the
city had no jurisdiction in the case. Expecting protection from the
district courts, which they had ample reason to believe would be given,
the firm continued to do an illegal liquor business without a city
license. On the date mentioned, the police emptied all the liquor into the
ditch and destroyed all the vessels that were used in its sale.
For this action suit was brought against the officers on
complaint of Mr. Englebrecht, and they were placed under bonds to await
the action of the grand jury on a criminal charge.
An Illegal Jury
Judge Strickland ordered the grand jurors for that term
of court selected by the United States marshal upon a writ of open venire,
when the law provided that the county clerk in the presence of other
officials should select them by lot. The attorneys for the city officers
challenged the proceedings and filed a motion to that effect. Judge
Strickland ruled that the third district court was a United States court
and subject to the acts of Congress, and not the laws of the territory,
the challenge was overruled and the jurors accepted. The accused men were
indicted and then convicted for “a wilful and malicious destruction of
property,” and were ordered to pay damages in the sum of $59,063.25, which
was three times the price of the property destroyed. The supreme court of
Utah affirmed the decision and an appeal was taken to the supreme court of
the United States. Of this action we will speak later.
Indictment Against President Young
When these perverters of the law had things arranged to
their liking they prepared to conduct a crusade against the Church.
President Young was indicted by this hand-picked grand jury for “lewd and
lascivious cohabitation.” He was later admitted to bail by Judge McKean in
the sum of five thousand dollars.
“A System on Trial”
Arguments were made before the court to quash the
indictment, which consumed several days, but Judge McKean rendered a
decision in which he said:
“Let the counsel on both sides, and the court also
keep constantly in mind the uncommon character of this case. The supreme
court of California has well said, ‘Courts are bound to take notice of
the political and social conditions of the country they judicially
rule.’ It is therefore proper to say, that while the case at bar is
called ‘the People versus Brigham Young,’ its other and real title is
‘Federal Authority versus Polygamic Theocracy.’ The government of the
United States, founded upon a written Constitution, finds within its
jurisdiction another government claiming to come from God—imperium
in imperio—whose policy and practices are, in grave particulars,
at variance with its own. The one government arrests the other, in the
person of its chief, and arraigns it at this bar. A system is on trial
in the person of Brigham Young. Let all concerned keep this fact
steadily in view; and let that government rule without a rival which
shall prove to be in the right.”
The motion being overruled the defendant pleaded not
guilty, and further proceedings were postponed for future action. Among
the attorneys defending President Young were Thomas Fitch and Charles H.
Hempstead, non-“Mormons.” The latter was formerly captain of the
California volunteers and editor of the Vedette,
the first anti-“Mormon” paper in Utah. He resigned the office of United
States district attorney because of the wicked and malicious methods in
which the federal courts in Utah were conducted, and became legal counsel
for President Young.
Throughout the entire country the attitude and remarks
of Judge McKean were severely criticized for attempting to prosecute the
Church in the case of Brigham Young and punish him for the alleged “evils
of a system.”
Unexpected Calling of the Case
Having been given to understand that his case would not
be called until the spring term of court, President Young, who was in
ill-health, went to St. George to spend the winter. His leading attorney,
Thomas Fitch, also departed for the East. No sooner had Judge McKean
learned of the departure of President Young than he set the date for the
trial for the 20th of November. Attorney Hempstead protested, and asked
for further time on the ground that it was not understood that the case
would be called. Mr. Baskin, the prosecutor, demanded a forfeiture of the
bond because the defendant was not present, but Judge McKean granted a
stay until December 4, and later to the 9th of January, 1872. It was
published by the Associated Press that Brigham Young had forfeited his
bond and had fled from justice, and every lie imaginable to his injury was
presented to the people of the United States. Although he was sick and it
was bitter winter weather, President Young, over the protest of his
brethren, returned to Salt Lake City, to face trial before the unfriendly
court. In the meantime, however, Mr. Baskin who had been improperly
appointed district attorney, was replaced by George C. Bates.
Other Accusations
On the statement of William A. Hickman, a self-confessed
murderer, who had been excommunicated from the Church for his crimes,
charges were made against Brigham Young, Daniel H. Wells and others, as
accessories to Hickman’s crimes. President Young knew that he would also
face this charge when he returned to Salt Lake City. Nevertheless he
returned, and on the 2nd day of January, appeared in court to the
astonishment of his enemies and asked to be admitted to bail. District
Attorney Bates was willing that bail should be given if it should be fixed
at the unreasonable sum of five hundred thousand dollars, but Judge McKean
refused on any terms to release the defendant. However, out of
consideration for the condition of his health he permitted him to be a
prisoner in his own house guarded by deputy marshals. Daniel H. Wells, who
was mayor of Salt Lake City, had previously been admitted to bail in the
sum of fifty thousand dollars. This was looked upon as an act of Providence
—almost a miracle. A quarrel arising between the judge and the
district attorney, both went to Washington and the trial of the accused
brethren was postponed.
The Englebrecht Decision
The case never came to trial, for from the supreme court
of the United States there came a decision which overturned the rulings of
the tyrannical judges. It was the decision in the Englebrecht liquor case.
The dispatch announcing it, which came over the wire April 15, 1872, was
as follows: “Jury unlawfully drawn: summons invalid; proceedings ordered
dismissed. Decision unanimous. All indictments quashed.” This decision put
an end to these petty persecutions for the time, and about one hundred and
twenty individuals, many of whom had been imprisoned many months, were
released.
The Poland Law
In 1874, Congress passed a measure repealing certain
Utah statutes relating to the territorial marshal and attorney general,
and vesting their duties in the federal officers. The probate courts were
also limited in their jurisdiction to matters of estates, guardianship and
divorce. This, in part, is what the anti-“Mormon” element had been
contending for in Utah. While this legislation was much less radical than
that previously proposed, yet it curtailed the civil and political rights
of the people, which had guaranteed their protection against tyranny in
the past.
The Case of Ann Eliza Webb Young
In July, 1873, a divorce suit was filed before Judge
McKean, by Ann Eliza Webb Young, against President Brigham Young. This
woman, a plural wife, besides asking for a decree of separation also sued
for alimony pending the litigation, and for permanent support for herself
and two children by a former marriage. The case dragged along until
February, 1875, when Judge McKean ordered the defendant to pay the
plaintiff three thousand dollars attorney’s fees and five hundred dollars
a month for her support and the education of her children. President Young
was given ten days in which to pay the fees, and twenty days to pay the
alimony, which amounted for the nineteen months to nine thousand five
hundred dollars.
An appeal was taken to the supreme court of the
territory, but before a decision could be reached the time limit had
expired, and the defendant was again dragged before the remarkable
tribunal of Judge McKean to show cause why he should not be punished for
contempt of court. He denied that he had any intention of showing contempt
and was merely seeking the benefit of an appeal. Judge McKean held that he
was guilty of contempt and sentenced him to twenty-four hours’
imprisonment in the penitentiary. He was accompanied to prison by a number
of friends and spent the night in comparative comfort in a room adjoining
the warden’s quarters.
Removal of Judge McKean
The news of this strange trial and the actions of Judge
McKean spread throughout the country. There was a great deal of
unfavorable comment. The San Francisco Bulletin
said: “When Judge McKean assumes that this woman is the wife of Young,
makes an interlocutory degree granting her three thousand dollars to
maintain a suit for divorce, when there never was a legal marriage, and
commits Young for contempt because he hesitates long enough to raise the
question of the legality of the order, he burns some strange fire on the
altar of justice.” A Chicago paper stated: “This summary method of dealing
with the Prophet looks very much like persecution, and will awaken
sympathy for him instead of aiding the cause of justice.” Even the
President of the United States, who had stood by Judge McKean through all
his dealings, when others protested and favored his removal, was forced to
take some action. Five days after he sent President Young to prison, Judge
McKean was removed from office for “several acts,” which the dispatch
stated, were deemed “ill advised and tyrannical, and in excess of his
powers as a judge.”
The Case of George Reynolds
In 1874, George Reynolds, the private secretary of
President Brigham Young, and a man of honor and integrity, was indicted
for violation of the bigamy law of 1862. This was to be a test case. The
“Mormon” people felt confident that the law was unconstitutional as it
restricted them in the exercise of their religion and plural marriage had
been commanded by the Lord. Elder Reynolds hearing of his indictment
voluntarily appeared in court, and gave himself up for trial. He was
convicted and sentenced to one year’s imprisonment and to pay a fine of
five hundred dollars. An appeal was taken to the supreme court of the
territory, and the case was dismissed on the ground that the grand jury
which found the indictment was an illegal jury.
The Second Reynolds Trial
A second trial was held in 1875, before Alexander White,
chief justice of Utah. Judge White manifested a determination to be
severe, and when a verdict of guilty was rendered, he sentenced Elder
Reynolds to pay a fine of five hundred dollars and serve a term of two
years in the penitentiary at hard labor. The supreme court of Utah
confirmed the decree, and an appeal was taken to Washington.
Death of President George A. Smith
September 1, 1875, President George A. Smith, first
counselor to President Brigham Young, died at his residence—the
Historian’s Office—in Salt Lake City. He was ordained to the
apostleship at the temple lot in Far West, April 26, 1838, when in his
twenty-second year. He passed through the trials and vicissitudes of the
Church from the days of Kirtland. He was Church historian and recorder
from 1854 until the time of his death. In the fall of 1872 he took a
mission to Europe and Asia, accompanied by Elder Lorenzo Snow and others,
and visited the various missions and Jerusalem, where he rededicated the
land for the return of the Jews. While absent he was sustained as
trustee-in-trust for the Church.
Dedication of the St. George Temple
The forty-seventh general conference of the Church was
held in the St. George Temple in April, 1877. President Young, his
counselors, the apostles and many leading brethren were present. The St.
George Temple was dedicated on the 6th, President Daniel H. Wells offering
the dedicatory prayer. This was the first temple to be erected in the
Rocky Mountains, and the first which the Saints had been privileged to
build without molestation by enemies. Work for both the living and the
dead commenced in the building following the dedication and has continued
to be performed ever since.
Death of President Young
August 29, 1877, President Brigham Young, then in his
seventy-seventh year, passed away after a brief illness, at his home in
Salt Lake City, surrounded by his family. On the 19th, he organized the
Box Elder Stake of Zion, at Brigham City, which marked the close of his
public ministry. The last words he uttered were “Joseph, Joseph, Joseph!”
He was thinking of—perhaps conversing with—the Prophet Joseph
Smith. September 2, the funeral services were held in the tabernacle, and
there were gathered there to pay their respects and to mourn, the many
thousands of modern Israel.
Brigham Young, the Prophet
Brigham Young, the great pioneer and colonizer—but
greater still the prophet of the Lord—was sincerely loved by the
righteous and equally hated by the wicked. His life was one of trials and
tribulations. Few were the days he spent in peace; many were the days he
suffered and labored for the love of his fellow-men. He died
misunderstood, save by the little band of devoted Saints who suffered with
him and shared his hopes, his aspirations, and the assurance which was his
of eternal life in our Father’s Kingdom.
Chapter 48
A Great People in the Mountains
By the time President Brigham Young’s administration
came to a close, the Latter-day Saints had become a great people in the
Rocky Mountains. They were destined still to grow in numbers, spread over
greater territory, conquer more deserts, and develop spiritually and
temporally in keeping with the progress of the times; but even then (1877)
they had built up many settlements, spread over a vast area, and
accomplished a wonderful work in the reclamation of the arid west.
The Planting of Colonies
Before the Saints had been in the Salt Lake Valley a
year many parties were sent out, principally to the north and to the
south, to form new settlements. Within two years from the time Salt Lake
City was founded colonies had been planted in the uttermost parts of the
territory. Exploring parties were sent out in advance, and when a site was
selected a large company of volunteers followed to make the permanent
settlement. In these colonies care was taken to have a proper
representation of craftsmen, that the needs of the settlers might be
supplied. Skilled carpenters, masons, millwrights, blacksmiths, cobblers,
as well as tillers of the soil, went into these unbroken wastes and made
them blossom by their industry. Each individual was given a specific duty
to perform, and did it unselfishly, according to the plan which had been
arranged. Ploughs, seeds and the required animals for ploughing, ditch
building and other labor, were provided, and the labor was done on the
co-operative plan. All shared alike, according to their individual needs.
They were happy, notwithstanding the rigorous toil required to subdue the
desert places.
Unparalleled Progress
It has been written of them, that they “made more
progress and suffered less privation in reclaiming the waste lands of the
wilderness than did the Spaniards in the garden spots of Mexico and
Central America, or the English in the most favored region near the
Atlantic seaboard.” But let it be understood this was not accomplished by
them without severe trial and suffering.
Their Perfect Organization
The reason they were able to obtain such excellent
results is that they had a perfect organization, and were loyal and
obedient to the authority over them. This naturally resulted in complete
co-operation and unity of purpose, with a minimum of individual
selfishness. They had not come to the Rocky Mountains for the sake of
worldly aggrandizement, but for the establishment of permanent homes, and
the exercise of their religious freedom in peace according to the dictates
of their conscience.
Proselytes from Europe
Between the years 1847 and 1856, fifty-nine companies of
emigrants, comprising seventeen thousand souls, sailed from European
shores, bound for Utah. Five thousand others had previously emigrated,
making a total of about twenty-two thousand persons from abroad, who had
joined the Church through the preaching of the Gospel. They were
principally from the British Isles, Scandinavia, Germany and Switzerland,
with a small sprinkling from France, Italy and other nations. They came
from the factories and the mines of Great Britain, the fisheries and the
dairy farms of Scandinavia, the workshops of Germany, the vineyards of
France and Italy—from various pursuits and occupations in which many
of them were unable, in the old world, out of the scanty pittance they
received as wages, to save enough to buy a passage across the sea. Of the
emigration from the old country between 1850 and 1860, it was estimated
that 28 per cent were common laborers; 14 per cent, miners, and about 28
per cent mechanics. From the ranks of the remaining thirty per cent there
came many merchants, doctors, professors, skilled engineers, artisans, and
artists.
Character of the Converts
Occasionally there was one who had joined the Church who
was in possession of an abundance of this world’s goods, and big enough to
share with his less fortunate neighbor, for the converts were not confined
to the poor and the needy, the unlearned and the ignorant. In fact very
few of the latter class received the Gospel message. The converts were
gathered from all nations, but they were not the scum, the moral outcasts,
the undesirables among the nations, but the very bones and sinews, the
life’s blood, the brawn, without which the nations would perish from the
earth. This class, despised and trodden under foot from time immemorial by
the haughty, the proud, the titled nobility; but upon whom, nevertheless,
the aristocratic population depend for their very existence, is the salt
of the earth—that class which the scriptures say, in the day of the
Savior’s ministry, had the Gospel preached to them and heard it gladly.
The pioneer immigrants, who established the state of
Utah, belonged to the great industrial class, honest, though generally
poor, which laid the foundation of our nation. Among the early members of
the Church were many who fought in freedom’s cause and who were
descendants of the early colonial families of New England and the border
Atlantic States.
What the Gospel Did for Them
“Mormonism” took hold of the dependent thousands of poor
from all parts of the earth and made them virtually independent by placing
them on farms, and otherwise furnishing them with remunerative employment,
by which they became financially free. The year that President Young died,
the population of Utah Territory was approximately one hundred and forty
thousand, and of that number over forty thousand were of foreign birth.
Men from the looms of England, the factories of Germany, and various other
dependent vocations, in the towns and cities of Europe, were under the
necessity of changing the nature of their lives. These men, unaccustomed
to the severity of the labor required in farming were sent out to reclaim
the desert wastes, and to till the soil in an uninviting land; yet they
were successful, and were transformed into prosperous farmers,
stockraisers, blacksmiths, husbandmen, and were made free landholders
—a thing they never dreamed of becoming while residing in the
crowded centers of Europe.
The Amalgamation of Many Peoples
Notwithstanding they were gathered from the four
quarters of the earth, with all their different customs and habits of
life, their new surroundings, coupled with their unity of religious views,
soon welded them together into one race and people. The Gospel as revealed
through Joseph Smith teaches unity. Those who embrace it, whatever their
views may have been before, soon learn to think alike; their aims are the
same, their desires mutual, and all are brought to a common understanding.
Such are the effects of the Gospel upon them that they forget their
nationality and are absorbed by their new environment, and truly become a
part of the soil on which they dwell.
Benefits from the Amalgamation
As England was made great through the mingling of
Norman, Saxon and Dane with the native tribes of Britain, so also have the
“Mormon” people benefited through the amalgamation of the races. Through
the preaching of the Gospel “Mormonism” has drawn on the best nations; has
sifted and gathered from them their very best people, and due to the
peculiar circumstances that prevail, the unity of faith and aspiration the
Gospel inspires, it is moulding out a new and superior race. The “Mormon”
people are strong mentally, spiritually, morally, as well as physically.
Battling with the elements and contending with many difficulties have made
them such. They came to the valleys of the mountains “with songs of
everlasting joy” to obtain inheritances for themselves and children after
them that shall endure forever, in a land of liberty, known to them as
being “choice above all other lands.”
Frugality and Co-operation
The early settlers were taught to produce as far as
possible, all that they consumed; to be frugal and not wasteful of their
substance; to draw from the elements the necessities of life and avoid all
vitiated tastes which would lead them into excessive indulgence. Home
industry was the watchword, and the people of necessity were called upon
to be producers. Their clothing, though plain, was durable and the
workmanship of their own hands. In the days of the pioneer, and until
comparatively recent times, the spinning wheel and the loom were to be
seen in the homes of the Saints.
Co-operation and community interests did much for the
people in those early days. Houses were built, canals were dug, fields
were ploughed and planted, and reservoirs were constructed on the
co-operative principle for the welfare of the people. There was no money
to be had, and such was the concern of the individual for the progress of
the community that his time was given gratis in the making of public and
civic improvements. He realized that he was bound to reap his portion of
the benefits derived from his toil.1
Changed Conditions of Today
Today it is largely the case, that a man who gives his
time, even though it be in some labor from which he is bound to receive
his portion of the reward, feels that he must receive some monetary
remuneration for the time he spends. And thus, due to the modern labor
conditions and the closer contact with the outside world, with all its
customs, theories and established institutions, this excellent and
neighborly custom of co-operation, which existed in the days of President
Brigham Young, has almost entirely passed away.
Division of Lands and Water
President Young taught the doctrine that a man should
have as much farm land as he could properly cultivate, and not more. The
lands were divided among the people on that principle. From the beginning
it was also established that the water from the mountain streams should
belong to the people and not to private individuals. This doctrine proved
extremely beneficial. Where private individuals have been permitted to
file on the canyon streams, it has been a detriment to the majority of the
people who are dependent upon such streams.
A Farsighted Policy
The farsighted policy of President Young was the means
of placing the people in their own homes where they could dwell “safely,
every man under his vine and under his fig tree.” As late as the year
1896, the year Utah was admitted into the Union, there were 19,816 farms
and of that number 17,584 were free from encumbrance of mortgage and debt.
Unfortunately, since the advent of the automobile and other modern
conveniences and amusements, such a condition does not exist today.
The Recreation of the People
Although the Latter-day Saints were forced to labor
diligently and there was no place for idlers among them, they found time
for proper recreation. President Young realized the necessity of
recreation and amusement and knew their proper place. The Sabbath day was
sacredly observed. There was no conflict between duty and pleasure and the
labors of the people were faithfully performed. He encouraged the drama
and other educational diversions in which the routine of the daily lives
of the people was broken. He built the Salt Lake Theatre, which was begun
in 1861 and opened to the public in March 1862. Before that time the
Social Hall, which was built in 1852, was used for such entertainment.
There was much local talent among the people, which was augmented by
visits to the territory of the great artists of those times. The dance
—not, however, as it is conducted in these modern days—was
likewise encouraged. All amusements were opened and closed with prayer;
and the presence of the great Pioneer and his associates at these
entertainments, not only lent encouragement to the recreation, but was an
influence which established proper decorum and conduct. Their amusements
were all innocent and uplifting. The main thought of President Young was
to couple education with the recreation of the people, and have all
entertainments controlled by the influence of the Spirit of the Lord.
Importance of Education Realized
The education of the youth of the Church was a matter
which received constant attention, nor was there anything that was
considered of greater importance. The Prophet Joseph Smith taught that
“the glory of God is intelligence,” and from the organization of the
Church, schools have been conducted for the members who were instructed to
obtain “out of the best books words of wisdom” by study and by faith.
In February 1850, the legislature of the provisional
government chartered the University of Deseret (now the University of
Utah) somewhat on the lines of the charter of the University of Nauvoo. It
was provided that $5000.00 be appropriated annually by the legislature for
the support of the University. This was a very large sum for that day, to
be provided by the handful of people for the support of such an
institution. It was also provided that primary, or district schools should
be supported. While this action was taken by officers of the provisional
government, and later ratified by them as officers of Utah Territory, yet
they were all members of the Church, with President Young taking the
initiative in the educational movement.
In the spring of 1851, district school houses were built
in most of the wards of Salt Lake City. These buildings were used for the
general ward gatherings of the Saints, and daily schools were held in them.
The Beginning of Church Schools
In later years, after the territory had increased in
population, other schools were established. President Young founded a
number of Church schools. Among these were the Brigham Young Academy (now
the Brigham Young University) at Provo, one of the leading institutions of
learning in the state; the Brigham Young College at Logan, and the
Latter-day Saints University (now High School) at Salt Lake City.2 In
addition to these schools the auxiliary organizations3 also were
organized for the training and education of the members of the Church and
have aided materially in this direction.
Territorial Expansion
At the close of the first decade after the settlement of
Utah, colonies of the Latter-day Saints extended from Fort Limhi on the
north, to Cedar City, on the south, a distance of about five hundred
miles; and from Fort Supply on the east to Carson Valley on the west,
about four hundred miles. The population of this area was about fifty
thousand people, nearly all members of the Church.
Fort Limhi
In the summer of 1855, a colony was sent to the north
where they founded Fort Limhi (now called Lemhi) on Salmon River. This was
the most northerly settlement of the Saints, about three hundred and
seventy-five miles from Salt Lake City. The settlement was continued until
1858 when it was abandoned for the reason that it was too far away and the
colonists were constantly harassed by hostile Indian tribes.
On the Rio Virgin
In 1861, a large number of Saints were called to go from
the middle and central counties of Utah to settle on the Rio Virgin and
Santa Clara Rivers. They located and founded the city of St. George, and
other towns on the upper Rio Virgin. The following year other members of
the Church were called to go to that southern country to lend strength to
the settlements. That year they raised about one hundred thousand pounds
of cotton in the “Dixie” of the West, showing that this industry was a
possibility.
San Bernardino
At a much earlier date (1851), Elders Amasa M. Lyman and
Charles C. Rich, with about five hundred souls from Utah, journeyed to
southern California, where in September of that year they built the town
of San Bernardino. This continued to be a flourishing settlement until
1858, when the people were called back to Utah owing to the coming of
Johnston’s Army, and was never again occupied as a permanent settlement by
the Saints.
Bear Lake Valley
In the fall of 1863, Bear Lake Valley was settled by a
colony under the leadership of Elder Charles C. Rich, who made that
country his home until his death, November 17, 1883. Cache Valley had
previously been occupied and settlements founded as early as 1856.
The Muddy Mission
Early in the year 1871, the Saints who had gone to the
far south and settled on the Muddy River in 1865, abandoned their homes,
due to oppressive taxation levied against them by the new state of Nevada,
which had been created out of the western portion of the territory of
Utah. Subsequently, however, these settlements were re-established.
In this manner were the valleys of the mountains
occupied by the Latter-day Saints through the inspiration and wisdom of
President Brigham Young. Many of these settlements have grown into
thriving and populous centers with a future before them of still wider and
greater expansion.
Organization of Stakes
At the time of the death of President Young in 1877,
there were organized in the Church twenty Stakes of Zion,4
namely, in the order of their creation: Salt Lake, Weber, Utah, Parowan,
Cache, Juab, Millard, Beaver, Bear Lake, Sevier, St. George, Kanab,
Panguitch, Davis, Tooele, Morgan, Sanpete, Summit, Wasatch and Box Elder.
Two others, St. Louis and Carson Valley, had been discontinued. The wards
in the Church on that date were approximately two hundred and fifty.
The Missions
During the administration of President Young, missionary
labors were performed in the various States of the Union, and in the
following foreign lands: Canada, British Isles, India, Australia,
Palestine, Society Islands, France, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Hawaii,
Italy, Switzerland, Iceland, Chile, Germany, Siam, Gibraltar, South
Africa, Malta, West Indies, New Zealand, Holland, Austria, Finland and
Mexico. In some of these fields little was accomplished; from others there
have been gathered to Zion many thousands of the scattered house of
Israel, and principally of the tribe of Ephraim, according to the
predictions of the ancient prophets. This has been especially true of the
Anglo-Saxon, Scandinavian and Teutonic races.
Notes
1. We have a marvelous combination of physiographic
conditions and social organizations in the development of Utah under the
guidance of Mormonism. The agriculture pursued was irrigated agriculture,
which for its success is dependent upon a compact society, well knit
together. Individualism was out of the question under these conditions,
and in Mormonism we find precisely the cohesive strength of religion
needed at that juncture to secure economic success.
Agriculture was made the foundation of the economic
life, and consciously so. Brigham Young discouraged mining and adventurous
pursuits, because he had a theory of socio-economic development in
accordance with which agriculture should come first, manufacturing second,
and mining later. It was essential that food should be produced first of
all, and also there was a desire that settled habits should be acquired.
Another peculiarity of the situation, namely, that the land could be made
to yield a harvest only by means of irrigation, has just been mentioned,
and the Mormons thus became the pioneers of modern irrigation in the
United States. (Dr. Richard R. Ely, in Harper’s
Magazine, 1903)
For the school year ending in June 1922, the Church appropriated the
sum of $750,000 for the maintenance of Church schools.
Part Six
Recent Development
Chapter 49
The Apostles Again Preside
At the death of President Brigham Young, there was
rejoicing among the enemies of the Church, who thought it was due to his
strong personality and force of character that “Mormonism” endured. They
did not, and could not, comprehend that the Church had been restored for
the last time, and was destined to endure forever with the stamp of divine
approval upon it, for the Power by which it was upheld was higher and
greater than the personality of any man. The Lord Jesus Christ was its
founder, and he had promised to protect and watch over it unto the end.
The death of President Young again made the council of
Twelve Apostles the presiding quorum of the Church, and as such they were
unanimously sustained at the October conference in 1877, with President
John Taylor at their head. President John Taylor was born at Milnthorpe,
Westmoreland, England, November 1, 1808. About the year 1828 he left his
native land and came to Canada, where he received the Gospel in 1836,
through the preaching of Elder Parley P. Pratt. He was called to the
apostleship in December, 1838, and was actively engaged in the ministry
from that time forth. He filled numerous missions and opened the door for
the preaching of the Gospel in France in 1850. He superintended the
translation of the Book of Mormon in French and German, and was engaged in
literary work at home and abroad covering a period of many years.
President Taylor was a man of high integrity and strong conviction. He was
painfully wounded in Carthage jail—four balls entered his body—
at the time of the martyrdom of the Prophet Joseph and Patriarch Hyrum
Smith. Under his administration the Church grew and expanded
notwithstanding the fierce and cruel persecution through which it was
forced to go, when the government of the United States, without mercy, was
arrayed against it.
The Twelve Apostles continued to act as the Presidency
of the Church until October, 1880, a little more than three years, when
the First Presidency again was organized.
The Decision in the Reynolds Case
The case of Elder George Reynolds, which had been
appealed to the supreme court of the United States in 1875, was argued
before that body in November 1878. January 6, 1879, that court handed down
a decision unanimously confirming the sentence of the courts of Utah, and
also declaring the anti-bigamy law of 1862 to be constitutional. This
decision was of the utmost concern to the Latter-day Saints, who were
confident that the supreme court, in justice, could not give confirmation
to a law which they sincerely believed to be an infringement of their
religion.
President Taylor’s Comment
President John Taylor, convinced that this decision was
an assault on the exercise of religion guaranteed by the Constitution,
stated in an interview and in answer to questions from O. J.
Hollister, United States internal revenue collector in Utah, the following:
“When the Constitution of the United States was framed
and adopted, those high contracting parties did positively agree that
they would not interfere with religious affairs. Now, if our marital
relations are not religious, what is? This ordinance of marriage was a
direct revelation to us through Joseph Smith, the Prophet. You may not
know it, but I know that this is a revelation from God and a command to
his people, and therefore it is my religion. I do not believe that the
Supreme Court of the United States has any right to interfere with my
religious views, and in doing it they are violating their most sacred
obligations. . . .“We acknowledge our children; we acknowledge our
wives; we have no mistresses. We had no prostitution until it was
introduced by monogamy, and I am now told that these other diabolical
deeds are following in its train. The courts have protected these people
in their wicked practices. We repudiate all such things, and hence I
consider that a system that will enable a man to carry out his
professions, and that will enable him to acknowledge his wife or wives
and acknowledge and provide for his children and wives, is much more
honorable than that principle which violates its marital relations and,
whilst hypocritically professing to be true to its pledges, recklessly
violates the same and tramples upon every principle of honor, which sits
down and coolly and deliberately decides how many children shall be
murdered and how many shall live.”
An Unjust Sentence
The sentence including “hard labor” pronounced against
Elder Reynolds was in excess of the law. On that ground the attempt was
made to have the case reopened and the proceedings quashed, but the
supreme court of the United States refused to issue such an order. It did,
however, remand the case to the supreme court of Utah, with instructions
“to cause the sentence of the district court to be set aside, and a new
one entered on the verdict in all respects like that before imposed,
except so far as it requires the imprisonment to be at hard labor.” A
petition from over thirty thousand citizens of the territory, asking for
the pardon of the defendant was forwarded to President Rutherford B.
Hayes, who ignored it.
The Defendant Imprisoned
The defendant, George Reynolds, was re-sentenced June
14, 1879, and two days later he left Salt Lake City, for Lincoln,
Nebraska, in charge of George A. Black and William T. Shaughnessy, deputy
marshals, to serve his sentence in the Nebraska penitentiary. He served
less than a month in that prison when he was brought back to Utah and
placed in the local penitentiary where he was confined until he had served
out his sentence, from June 1879 to January 1881, receiving the remission
of his fine and the reduction for good behavior of one hundred and
forty-four days. While confined he taught school, his pupils being the
inmates of the prison. So successful was he that the warden remarked of
him: “Reynolds is worth more than all the guards in keeping order among
the prisoners.”
Bitter Threats Against the Church
The bitterness of the anti-“Mormon” press of Salt Lake
City, and the broadcast circulation of falsehoods by the enemies of the
Church commenced an agitation throughout the nation that was to result in
special legislation against the “Mormon” people intended to encompass
their destruction. Ministers of the Protestant churches in the United
States took up the hue and cry. Many bitter expressions were heard in
condemnation of the Latter-day Saints, and threats were made against their
peace and safety. A sample of the bloodthirsty utterances is that given by
Rev. T. DeWitt Talmage in the Brooklyn Tabernacle, shortly after the death
of President Young, as follows: “Now my friends—now, at the death of
the Mormon Chieftain, is the time for the United States government to
strike. They are less organized than they have been, and less than they
will be. If these Mormons will not submit to authority, let so much of
their rich lands be confiscated for the wants of the government as will be
sufficient for their subjugation. If the government of the United States
cannot stand the expense, let Salt Lake City pay for it. (Applause.) Turn
their vast temple into an arsenal. Set Phil Sheridan after them. (Immense
applause.) Give them enough troops and he will teach all Utah that forty
wives is thirty-nine too many. I call upon the Church of Jesus Christ to
pray for the overthrow of this iniquity.”
Address of Anti-“Mormon” Women
In November, 1878, the Gentile women in Salt Lake City
met in the Congregational Church, to the number of about two hundred, and
drew up an address to the wife of the President of the United States,
denouncing plural marriage and its practice in the name of religion. They
called upon the “Christian women of the United States” to aid them in the
arrest of “the progress of evil,” and to delay the admission of Utah into
statehood until this was accomplished. Congress was also memorialized and
circular letters were forwarded to the clergy with the request that they
be presented to their congregations for signatures and then sent to the
congressmen of their respective districts.
“Mormon” Women Reply
A counter mass meeting of the women of the Church was
held November 16, 1878, in which they declared they had been misjudged and
misrepresented to the nation in regard to their most sacred rights. They
invited the government to make an impartial investigation of their cause.
Falsehoods of the Press
Nearly every paper in the United States devoted space to
the “Mormon” question, and almost without exception, with bitter
denunciation and suggestions to Congress of the most drastic nature. The
Salt Lake Tribune did not hesitate to circulate
the most contemptible falsehoods that these fires of hate might be kept
burning.
The Miles Case
Another cause of agitation, and one that went a long way
towards congressional action of the severest nature against the practice
of plural marriage, was the case of John H. Miles. This case ran a course
of about three years, having been carried before the supreme court of the
United States. Miles was arrested in October, 1878, on complaint of Carrie
Owen Miles, his wife. She accused Miles of having married Emily Spencer of
St. George, on the same day, and a little before her own ceremony was
performed. She was not present at the ceremony, but testified that during
a reception held that evening Emily Spencer was referred to as Mrs. Miles.
The case was taken before Judge Emerson, in the Third district court, in
April, 1879, where it was conceded that the ceremony had been performed
between John H. Miles and Carrie Owen, and the defense objected to the
testimony of the complainant on the ground that a wife could not testify
against her husband. The marriage of Miss Spencer was not admitted.
However, the evidence was taken and Miles was “found guilty” and sentenced
to pay a fine of one hundred dollars and serve a term of five years in the
penitentiary. An appeal was taken to the supreme court of Utah which
affirmed the decision, and the case was then taken to the supreme court of
the United States. The end of the matter came in 1881, when the supreme
court handed down a decision stating that an error had been committed in
the trial court by permitting Caroline Owen Miles to give evidence against
Miles, since the law in Utah provided that a wife could not legally
testify against her husband, or a husband against his wife. The marriage
with Emily Spencer not having been admitted, and not having been proved,
was the only issue in the trial. The decision was set aside and the case
remanded for a new trial. The case was dropped, as the United States
attorney felt that there could be no conviction. However, this case helped
to stir the country to such a pitch that legislation was enacted repealing
the Utah law.
Daniel H. Wells Before the Court
While the trial of John H. Miles was before the court,
Caroline Owen Miles gave a purported description of the apparel worn by
those who passed through the endowment house.1 The prosecution
attempted to show that such apparel was worn by those who went there to be
married. Daniel H. Wells, who had performed the ceremony for Miles and
Carrie Owen, was called to the stand and questioned by Attorney Van Zile,
who asked him to describe the dress worn in that building. This he
declined to do. Judge Emerson decided that the question was proper, and as
the witness still refused, he was placed in the custody of the marshal,
with instructions that he should appear in the court the next day, to show
cause why he should not be committed for contempt of court.
Imprisonment of Daniel H. Wells
The next day, May 3, 1879, President Wells, with his
attorney, appeared before Judge Emerson and stated his willingness to
answer the questions, if they should be put in a proper way. The questions
were put to him again, but purposely in such a way that he felt it his
duty not to answer them. He declared that he was under sacred obligation
to preserve secret what he was asked to reveal. The court insisted that he
should answer, and the witness replied: “I consider a person who reveals
the sacred ceremonies of the endowment house a falsifier and a perjurer;
and it has been and is a principle of my life never to betray a friend, my
religion, my country, or my God. It seems to me that this is sufficient
reason why I should not be held in contempt.”
The judge held that the witness was in contempt for not
answering, and sentenced him to pay a fine of one hundred dollars and to
be imprisoned for two days. President Wells was immediately placed in the
hands of the United States marshal and taken to the penitentiary where he
served his brief term of confinement.
A Public Protestation
The action of Judge Emerson caused great indignation,
and the Latter-day Saints were aroused. A public demonstration in protest
of the action was planned, and many people gathered from the surrounding
counties as far north as Bear Lake and south as far as Juab. A procession
of ten thousand formed and met President Wells at the Burton Farm, three
miles south of the city, and marched through the streets to the
tabernacle, which was thronged with people. The presence of the released
prisoner was a signal for prolonged applause. Speeches were made,
interspersed with music from several bands. As the procession marched
through the city they carried banners with inscriptions among which were
the following:
“If courts compel men to dishonor and forswear
themselves, how can they expect perjurers to give truth in evidence?”“We honor the law and its just administration, but we
despise petty tyranny.”“We will teach our children to be true to their
country and their God; but to perjure themselves never! no never!”“The rights of conscience we never submitted, we could
not submit; we are answerable for them to our God.” —Thomas
Jefferson.“If ever the laws of God and men are at variance, the
former are to be obeyed in derogation of the latter.” —Blackstone.“God’s Law: Thou shalt not forswear Thyself; but shall
perform unto the Lord thine oaths.”“Modern Law: Thou shalt forswear thyself, or go to
prison.”“When Free Masons, Odd Fellows and others are
compelled to make their secrets public, it will be time enough to
practice on Mormons; try the others first.”“We venerate the Constitution, we honor the law, we
respect the Executive, Congress and the Judiciary; we bow to the
righteous mandates of the law, but we despise bigots, we execrate
tyranny, and protest against intolerance from any source.”
Litigation over President Young’s Estate
In June, 1879, a few of the heirs of President Brigham
Young, in opposition to all the rest, entered suit against the executors
of the estate, claiming property held in the name of the late president as
trustee-in-trust for the Church, as his personal property. The sum in
litigation amounted to nearly one million dollars. Application was made
for an injunction restraining the executors from further performance of
their duties, and enjoining President John Taylor from disposing of any
property received by him as trustee-in-trust. Judge Emerson granted the
injunction and appointed William S. McCornick and United States Marshal
Shaughnessy, non-“Mormons,” to take charge of all the property. President
Taylor asked that the injunction be dissolved, and the order appointing
the receivers be revoked, on the ground that the claims against the estate
were “a bona fide existing indebtedness,” so recognized by the late
president, who authorized in his will the settling of such claims by his
executors.
Imprisonment of the Executors
A warrant was issued by Judge Boreman, who was most
bitter against the Church, for the arrest of President Taylor and the
executors, George Q. Cannon, Brigham Young, Jr., and Albert Carrington.
Showing that he had complied with the order of the court, President Taylor
was discharged, but the executors were committed to the penitentiary, for
refusing to furnish additional security, which was considered by them as
nothing more or less than an attempt to levy blackmail. Their imprisonment
extended from August 4 to 28, when they were released through the reversal
of Judge Boreman’s decision by the supreme court of the territory—
Judge Boreman dissenting.
Counter Suit and Settlement
A counter suit was brought against the heirs by the
Church for the recovery of its property, The case came before Judge John
A. Hunter, who had arrived in the territory the previous summer. The case
was dismissed in October (1879), without coming to judgment, as the
parties to the suit came to a mutual agreement. The litigant heirs,
according to the agreement, were paid the sum of seventy-five thousand
dollars and all charges were withdrawn. The receivers were dismissed.
President Taylor presented the terms of the settlement before the general
conference of the Church which convened two days after the decision was
made, and it was endorsed by unanimous vote.
Secretary Evarts’ Circular Letter
William M. Evarts, secretary of state, in the cabinet of
President Hayes, sent out a circular letter in October 1879, to the
diplomatic officers of the United States in foreign countries, advising
them that large numbers of persons from various lands were coming to the
United States for the purpose of joining the “Mormons” in Utah; also that
the marriage system of the “Mormons” was pronounced by the laws of the
United States to be a crime against the statutes of the country. These
immigrants, he said, came “to swell the numbers of the law-defying Mormons
of Utah,” who were endeavoring to bring persons to the United States with
the intent of violating laws punishable by fine and penitentiary
imprisonment. The representatives of the government abroad were instructed
to “check the organization of these criminal enterprises,” by calling the
attention of the several governments to the situation. This was to be in
the interest “not merely of a faithful execution of the laws of the United
States, but of the peace, good order and morality which are cultivated and
sought to be promoted by all civilized countries.”
Condemnation of Evarts’ Course
It was a time when condemnation of the “Mormons” was a
popular amusement in the world, but this letter of Secretary Evarts
brought down on his head a storm of ridicule, even from those unfriendly
to the Latter-day Saints, in this country and also in foreign lands. The
London Times was very caustic in its treatment
of the letter, and the New York Sun stated: “Now
let Mr. Evarts instruct his diplomatic agents abroad to ask the foreign
powers—as a favor and a friendly act towards the United States—
to hang any of their subjects who may become murderers after their arrival
in this country. The foreign powers are said to have been astonished by
Mr. Evarts’ circular. They had reason to be amazed.”
The Murder of Joseph Standing
The continued publication of unfavorable articles in the
press of the country concerning the Latter-day Saints, and the constant
repetition of falsehoods emanating from the enemies of the Church at Salt
Lake City—where most all the agitation originated—caused much
bitterness throughout the country. The missionaries of the Church were
sorely abused, especially in the Southern States, where many of them were
stripped, tied to trees and brutally beaten by mobs, until the blood ran
from their wounded bodies, and when released they were ordered from that
part of the country on pain of death if they remained.
On the 21st of July, 1878, Elders Joseph Standing,
twenty-five years of age, and Rudger Clawson, a youth of twenty-two, were
surrounded by a mob at Varnal Station, Whitefield County, Georgia, and
were taken to the woods apparently for the purpose of receiving a
thrashing. Elder Standing at this juncture made some show of resistance
when one of the mobbers fired at him. The ball passed through his left eye
and ranging upward came out of the forehead. Immediately following this
deed one of the gang, pointing at Elder Clawson, said, “Shoot that man!”
It was a critical moment for the young elder, who turned and coolly faced
the mob with folded arms and exclaimed, “Shoot!” His coolness seemed to
unnerve the mob who lowered their guns. It was then suggested by one of
the mobbers that Elder Standing had shot himself, although he was unarmed.
Elder Clawson at his earnest solicitation was permitted to go after help,
and while he was gone the fiends shot about twenty bullets into the body
of the prostrate man, mostly into his face and neck, and so close that the
wounds were powder burned.
The Coroner’s Verdict
An inquest was held and a verdict found in which David
D. Nations, Jasper N. Nations, A. S. Smith, David Smith, Benj. Clark,
William Nations, Andrew Bradley, James Fawcett, Hugh Blair, Joseph
Nations, Jefferson Hunter and Mack McClure, who were seen by witnesses in
the mob at the time of the killing, were accused of the crime.
“Not Guilty”
The guilty parties fled from Georgia. Three of them were
captured and returned to the state, but were released on furnishing bail
in the sum of five thousand dollars each. The grand jury found indictments
against Jasper Nations for murder, against Bradley for manslaughter, and
against Blair for riot. In October, 1879, their trial was held. Elder
Clawson attended as a witness, and notwithstanding the positive nature of
his testimony, and that of the other eye witnesses, all three defendants
were acquitted. Elder John Morgan, who was presiding in the Southern
States and who was present at the proceedings, sent a telegram to the Deseret News at the close of the trial of Jasper
Nations, stating: “The old, old story. Verdict, not guilty!”
Notes
The Endowment House was a comparatively small temple, erected in the
northwest corner of the Temple Block to serve temporarily as a house of
the Lord. It was torn down in 1889 by the order of President Wilford
Woodruff.
Chapter 50
The Year of Jubilee
April 6, 1880, was just fifty years from the day of the
organization of the Church. On this date and the three succeeding days,
the fiftieth annual conference of the Church was held in the tabernacle,
Salt Lake City. Preliminary meetings were also held on the 4th and 5th.
All the members of the council of the apostles were present, excepting
George Q. Cannon, who was in Washington representing Utah as delegate in
Congress. President John Taylor drew attention to the fact that this was
the jubilee year of the Church, and referred to the custom which prevailed
in old Israel, as set forth in the twenty-fifth chapter of Leviticus. It
was proposed that it be made a year of jubilee and forgiveness in the
Church. The Church set the example by striking off one half the
indebtedness held by the Perpetual Emigration Fund Company, against
individuals classed as worthy poor, amounting to the sum of $802,000. One
thousand cows and five thousand sheep were also distributed among the
needy. The Saints were advised to be charitable and liberal in their
dealing with one another. The sum of $75,899, in unpaid tithing, one half
the amount due, was remitted against the Saints who were unable to meet
their obligation. It was proposed that the Relief Society lend to the
farmers, who had suffered loss because of drouth the year before, 34,761
bushels of wheat which they had on hand. This was to be repaid by the
farmers, without interest, at the close of the next harvest. “If you find
people owing you who are distressed, if you will go to work and try to
relieve them as much as you can, under the circumstances, God will relieve
you when you get into difficulties,” said President Taylor. “I will tell
you that,” he added, “in the name of the Lord. Let us act on a kind,
generous, brotherly principle, doing good one to another and carrying out
the principles of the everlasting Gospel in our lives.”
The Pioneer Day Celebration
The spirit of the jubilee was carried through the year,
and was again made manifest in a marked manner at the celebration on
pioneer day, July 24, 1880. There was a long pageant, which paraded
through the streets of Salt Lake City, and on three of the floats were
natives from twenty-five countries, representing the people who had been
gathered through the preaching of the Gospel. A banner was also carried
upon which the inscription was written: “I will gather you out from all
nations.” Exercises were held in the tabernacle and patriotic speeches
were made. Utah had a population at that time of 143,690, showing an
increase of nearly 60,000 in the past decade. The great majority of these
were members of the Church.
President Taylor’s Prediction
At this celebration President Taylor gave utterance to
the following prediction: “There are events in the future, and not very
far ahead, that will require all our faith, all our energy, all our
confidence, all our trust in God, to enable us to withstand the influences
that will be brought to bear against us. . . . We cannot
trust in our intelligence; we cannot trust in our wealth; we cannot trust
to any surrounding circumstances with which we are enveloped; we must
trust alone in the living God to guide us, to direct us, to lead us, to
teach us and to instruct us. And there never was a time when we needed to
be more humble and more prayerful; there never was a time when we needed
more fidelity, self-denial, and adherence to the principles of truth, than
we do this day.”
Re-organization of the First Presidency
At the general semi-annual conference held in October,
1880, reports were made of the distribution of the cattle, sheep and other
substance, which was voted on at the April conference. A time of great
rejoicing was had and on the last day (10th) the First Presidency was
again re-organized with John Taylor as President of the Church, and George
Q. Cannon and Joseph F. Smith as his first and second counselor,
respectively. Elders Francis M. Lyman and John Henry Smith were called to
the apostleship, leaving one vacancy unfilled. The voting was done by
quorums, as it was at the sustaining of President Young, beginning with
the apostles; second, the patriarchs, presidents of stakes and counselors,
and high councils; third, the high priests; fourth, the seventies; fifth,
the elders; sixth, the bishops and their counselors; seventh, the lesser
priesthood—priests, teachers, deacons; eighth, the presidents of
various quorums, and last the whole congregation.
Death of Orson Pratt—Calling of Elders Teasdale
and Grant
Orson Pratt, the last surviving member of the original
council of apostles, died in Salt Lake City, October 3, 1881. Elder Pratt
possessed a remarkable analytical mind, and was one of the world’s great
mathematicians. His discourses and writings on the Gospel are clear and
convincing. With all his learning he was humble and unassuming, having
perfect assurance in the divinity of the mission of Joseph Smith.
In October, 1882, Elders George Teasdale and Heber J.
Grant were called to the apostleship by revelation given through President
John Taylor. Elder Seymour B. Young was also called to be one of the seven
presidents of the seventies.1 This revelation was
given October 13, 1882, and the brethren were ordained three days later.
The Lord, in this revelation, called upon the various quorums of the
Priesthood to arise and purify themselves, and for the members to magnify
their callings. The Saints were commanded to set their houses in order
that they might be purged from sin. The prediction was made that
eventually Zion should be established and the nations shall yet
acknowledge the Lord.
Dedication of the Logan Temple
The Logan Temple—the second structure of the kind
built in Utah—was dedicated May 17, 1884, under the direction of
President John Taylor, who offered the dedicatory prayer. The site for the
temple was dedicated May 17, 1877, by Orson Pratt. The work of excavation
was begun May 28, and the laying of rock in July following. September 19,
1877, the corner stones were laid, the order of temple-building being
followed. The dedicatory services in 1884, which lasted three days, were
very solemn and impressive, and the Saints rejoiced that another house of
the Lord had been built, where work for the salvation of the living and
the dead could be performed.
Anti-“Mormon” Legislation Agitated
During the eighties there appeared to be a united effort
on the part of the press and the denominational ministers to force
legislation against the Latter-day Saints. The chief instigators of this
campaign were anti-“Mormon” residents of Utah, with the aid of their
organ, the Salt Lake Tribune. President
Rutherford B. Hayes, who was imposed upon by this agitation, in a message
to Congress in December, 1879, and again in 1880, referred to the “Mormon”
question and plural marriage. President Garfield made similar reference in
his inaugural address, and after the assassination of Garfield, President
Arthur took the matter up in his first message to Congress.
Bitterness of “Christian” Ministers
The bitterness of the times was expressed by the Chicago
Interior, a Presbyterian paper in the summer of
1881, as follows:
“Let the lands and tenements of the Mormons be thrown
open to original entry by civilized settlers. . . . Let
it be understood that the army will keep out of the way in Utah for four
years, and that the use and occupation of Mormon property for one year
is to give a preemption title. There are enough young men in the West
and South, who are seeking homes, to finish up the pest, fumigate the
Territory, and to establish themselves in ninety days after the word
‘go’ is given.”
In consonance with this “Christian” spirit, the Rev. J.
H. Peters, at Dayton, in October, 1881, said to his congregation: “I
would that the guns of Fort Douglas were turned upon them [the “Mormons”]
and they made loyal by this means if by no other.” Falsehoods of the
deepest hue were also uttered. The notorious T. De Witt Talmage, for
instance, circulated the false report that the assassin of President
Garfield was a “Mormon,” and the Latter-day Saints were wickedly accused
by this reverend, and others, of holding meetings and rejoicing because of
the President’s death.
The Edmunds Bill
The result of all this agitation was the passing of a
law in March, 1882, by Congress, amending the law of 1862. It was known as
the Edmunds Law, because it was introduced into the senate by George F.
Edmunds of Vermont. This measure not only made punishable the contracting
of plural marriage, but also polygamous living, which was designated as
“unlawful cohabitation.” The punishment for contracting a plural marriage
remained the same as in the law of 1862—a fine of five hundred
dollars or imprisonment for five years, or both, in the discretion of the
court.
The President of the United States was authorized to
grant amnesty to those who had entered into plural marriage before the
passage of this bill, under certain conditions and limitations, and their
children born before January 1, 1883, were legitimated.
“No polygamist, bigamist, or any person cohabiting with
more than one woman, and no woman cohabiting with any of the persons
described as aforesaid . . . shall be entitled to vote at any
election . . . hold any office or place of public trust, honor
or emolument, in, under, or for any such Territory or place, or under the
United States,” was declared in this bill. Of course this was not intended
to apply to “Gentiles” who “cohabited” with more than one woman, outside
of the marriage relation, and such—and Utah had them—were
shielded by the officers of the law. Moreover, the mere belief in the
doctrine of plural marriage was sufficient to bar a person from jury
service.
All registration and election offices were declared
vacant, and provision was made for a commission of five persons to be
appointed by the President, and with the consent of the senate, to attend
to the duty of registration of voters, canvassing the returns of elections
for members of the territorial legislature, and issue certificates, or
other evidence of election, until otherwise provided by law. They were to
be paid three thousand dollars a year, and to continue in office until the
legislature, elected and qualified under the Edmunds Law, should provide
for filling the offices as authorized by the statute.
Self Government Denied
By this law, local self-government was annihilated in
Utah, contrary to all the guarantees granted to free people since the days
of the framing of the government of the United States, if not since the
days of King John. Following in the wake of this legislation there was
conducted a crusade against the “Mormon” people without a parallel in the
history of the United States.
The Utah Commission
The five commissioners appointed through the Edmunds
Law, arrived in Utah, August 18, 1882. They were: Alexander Ramsy, of
Minnesota, chairman; Algernon S. Paddock, of Nebraska; George L. Godfrey,
of Iowa; Ambrose B. Carlton, of Indiana; and James R. Pettigrew, of
Arkansas; with Arthur L. Thomas, secretary. They immediately set to work
on the duties assigned them, and appointed registrars for the November
election, in a manner most unjust to the “Mormon” people. Eight of the
registrars, out of twenty-four, were members of the Church, yet the
“Mormon” population was in excess of 120,000, and the “Gentile” population
—including apostates and others classed as “doubtful” was
approximately 23,000. The commissioners also published rules for the
guidance of the registrars and the government of election judges, which
were manifestly unfair and beyond the scope of the law, which was done to
disfranchise a large portion of the “Mormon” population.
The Test Oath
Perhaps the most abominable and shameful thing they did
was to prepare the following “test oath:”
County of Territory of Utah, } ss.
I ……………, being first duly sworn (or affirmed), depose
and say that I am over twenty-one years of age, and have resided in the
Territory of Utah for six months, and in the precinct of ……………… one
month immediately preceding the date hereof, and (if a male) am a native
born or naturalized (as the case may be) citizen of the United States
and a taxpayer in this Territory, or (if a female), I am native born, or
naturalized, or the wife, widow or daughter (as the case may be) of a
native born or naturalized citizen of the United States; and I do
further solemnly swear (or affirm) that I am not a bigamist or a
polygamist; that I am not a violator of the laws of the United States
prohibiting bigamy or polygamy; that I do not live or cohabit with more
than one woman in the marriage relation, nor does any relation exist
between me and any woman which has been entered into or continued in
violation of the said laws of the United States prohibiting bigamy or
polygamy; and (if a woman) that I am not the wife of a polygamist, nor
have I entered into any relation with any man in violation of the laws
of the United States concerning polygamy or bigamy.Subscribed and sworn before me this …….. day of …………,
1882.……………………………….
Registration Officer …… Precinct.
Careful Wording of the Oath
The expression “I do not live or cohabit with more than
one woman IN THE MARRIAGE RELATION,” was so placed as were other clauses
to apply against the “Mormons” only. The “Mormon” press and preachers drew
attention to this feature of the oath which denied to the “Mormon
polygamist,” but permitted the “Gentile libertine,” the right to vote. The
admission was commonly made that the Edmunds Law was prepared solely
against the “Mormons” and not to apply to the immoralities of the
“Gentiles.” This led the First Presidency in an address to the Saints in
August, 1882, to say that they regretted that men of high positions would
take that view of the law; but they perceived “with unmixed satisfaction”
the sharp distinction the oath drew between marriage and licentiousness.
The Law made Retroactive
Another infamous ruling was that any person who had
lived in the plural marriage state, but was then not living in that
relation, was denied the right of franchise; and this was interpreted to
apply to those who had thus married even before the law of 1862. For
instance, if a man had married two wives in 1850, before any law against
plural marriage was enacted, and both wives had died before the law was
passed; the commission ruled that he was a “polygamist” notwithstanding he
had no wife living, and denied him the right to vote. “Once a polygamist
always a polygamist,” was the common expression. Other rulings and
actions, contrary to the law, but intended to annoy and disfranchise the
members of the Church, that the minority might rule, were attempted, among
them denial to the women of their suffrage.
A Campaign of Persecution
From this time forth until the close of President John
Taylor’s administration, and beyond, the government of the United States
carried on a campaign of prosecution, that was relentless and even cruel,
against all members of the Church who had married plural wives. Men were
punished, not for contracting plural marriage since the passage of the
law, but for “unlawful cohabitation;” federal officers hunted men and
women and dragged them before selected grand juries, where they were
shamefully insulted. Even small children did not escape, but were forced
to testify and answer improper and indecent questions, with the object in
view of obtaining evidence against their parents; and this was done with
threats of dire punishment and contempt of court, if they refused. Such
actions partook too much of the days of the Spanish inquisition. Paid spies
—men of debased character—were employed to gather evidence.
Among those who sat on juries to judge the “morals” of the “Mormon”
people, were those who were recreant to every law of decency. The petty
officers and the judges of the courts carried on a reign of terror in
their determination to stamp out the practice of plural marriage, and it
appeared that the greatest crime in the world was for a man to acknowledge
honestly that he was the husband of more than one wife, and that he
diligently and faithfully supported them and their children; while for the
libertine and the harlot there was protection by officers of the law.
President Taylor’s Statement
At the general conference of the Church in April, 1882,
President John Taylor spoke of the approaching storm. “While the
excitement lasts,” said he, “it is useless to reason with the world; when
it subsides we can talk to them.” He also expressed the views of the
Latter-day Saints when he said: “We do not wish to place ourselves in a
state of antagonism, nor act defiantly, toward this government. We will
fulfil the letter, so far as practicable, of that unjust, inhuman,
oppressive, and unconstitutional law. . . . But we cannot
sacrifice every principle of human right. . . . While we
are God-fearing and law-abiding, and respect all honorable men and
officers, we are no craven serfs, and have not learned to lick the feet of
oppressors, nor to bow in base submission to unreasonable clamor. We will
contend, inch by inch, legally and constitutionally, for our rights as
American citizens.” So sore became the persecution that hundreds of homes
were broken up and husbands and fathers were sent to the penitentiary for
the offense of “unlawful cohabitation.”
A Tribune Canard
To add to the evil of the times the circulation of false
and malicious reports increased, and the Latter-day Saints were portrayed
as the vilest of the vile. The result of this was continued persecution of
the elders in the mission fields.
One of these abusive and lying canards appeared in the
Salt Lake Tribune, March 16, 1884. It purported
to be the disloyal utterances of “Bishop West, of Juab.” There was no
Bishop West, and the falsehood was exposed. When the
Tribune was caught red handed in its lying, it very reluctantly
admitted the falsehood, but added that the report sounded like what was
going on all the time. Articles of this kind were constantly appearing,
and the members of the Church were repeatedly insulted and abused with the
hope that some overt act might be committed through unendurable
provocation, and thus occasion be made against the Church for its
destruction. However, the persecuted people bore the insults without
giving cause for such diabolical action.
The Canard the Cause of Murder
The “Bishop West” hoax might have been forgotten if the
falsehood had ended with the exposure of the Tribune
story, but, unfortunately, it was circulated in Tennessee by a
Reverend Vandevere, of Lewis County, who made it an occasion to attack the
Saints in the South, and arouse the populace against them. He had been
duly advised of the nature of the falsehood, but that made no difference;
he continued to repeat the story. The result of this circulation of the Tribune’s falsehood, was the enacting of a tragedy,
at Cane Creek, Lewis County, Tennessee, of a most shocking character.
The Tennessee Massacre
It happened Sunday, August 10, 1884. That morning a
number of elders and Saints met at the home of James Condor for religious
worship. While the small congregation was assembling, a mob of masked
ruffians invaded the premises and shot and killed Elders John H. Gibbs, of
Paradise, and William S. Berry, of Kanarra, and also two young men, Martin
Condor and John Riley Hudson, who were not members of the Church, but who
attempted to protect the elders. Young Hudson, securing his gun, shot and
killed the leader of the mob, one David Hinson, but Hinson’s followers
returned the fire, mortally wounding the young man who died about one hour
later. Because of this retaliation the mob returned and poured a fire into
the house through the windows, seriously wounding Mrs. Condor, and
riddling the body of Elder Berry. They then secured the body of their
leader and made off. Two other missionaries, Elders William H. Jones and
Henry Thompson, escaped.
Elder Roberts Secures the Bodies of the Slain
Elder B. H. Roberts was at Chattanooga, in charge
of the mission in the absence of President John Morgan, who was in Salt
Lake City. At the peril of his own life he went forth and secured the
bodies of the missionaries and had them forwarded to Utah, where the
“Mormon” people were in mourning. The bodies of the slain elders were
interred at their home towns, but public funeral services were also held
in Salt Lake City, August 24, 1884.
Governor Murray to Governor Bate
Governor Eli H. Murray, of Utah, was so filled with
animus against the Latter-day Saints that it was impossible for him to
communicate with Governor W. B. Bate, of Tennessee, regarding the
massacre, without abuse of the Latter-day Saints. Governor Bate offered a
reward for the detection and arrest of the murderers. Evidently fearing
that they might be caught and punished, Governor Murray, without any
reason or excuse, sent a dispatch to the governor of Tennessee in which he
said: “Lawlessness in Tennessee and Utah are alike reprehensible, but the
murdered Mormon agents in Tennessee were sent from here as they have been
for years by the representatives of organized crime, and I submit that as
long as Tennessee representatives in Congress are, to say the least,
indifferent to the punishment of offenders against the national law in
Utah, such cowardly outrages by their constituents as the killing of
emigration agents sent there from here will continue.”
The Trial of Rudger Clawson
Charles S. Zane became chief justice of Utah in 1884. He
came to the territory, August 23, of that year. He was a man whose moral
life was above reproach, but he was possessed of an intolerant spirit, and
was determined to conduct a strict enforcement of the Edmunds Law. The
first case to be tried under that law came before his court October 15,
1884. It was the case of Rudger Clawson, who was found guilty, and when
asked by the court if he had any legal cause to show why judgment should
not be pronounced he replied:
“Your honor, I very much regret that the laws of my
country should come in conflict with the laws of God; but whenever they
do, I shall invariably choose the latter. If I did not so express
myself, I should feel unworthy of the cause I represent. The
constitution of the United States expressly says that Congress shall
make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the
free exercise thereof. (It cannot be denied I think, that marriage, when
attended and sanctioned by religious rites and ceremonies, is an
establishment of religion.) The law of 1862 and the Edmunds Law were
expressly designed to operate against marriage as practiced and believed
in by the Latter-day Saints. They are therefore unconstitutional, and of
course cannot command the respect that a constitutional law would. That
is all I have to say, your honor.”
The speech was characteristic of the man. It was bold,
sincere, but not defiant. It struck the judge with amazement and he
determined on a heavy penalty. It was the third day of November when Elder
Clawson was before the court. He was sentenced to pay a fine of eight
hundred dollars and imprisonment for four years. Elder Clawson remained in
prison until December 12, 1887—three years, one month and ten days
—when he received a pardon from President Grover Cleveland.
The Segregation Ruling
Following this trial there was inaugurated a cruel and
determined persecution. Women were sent to prison for contempt because
they would not testify against their husbands. The courts ruled that
indictments might be found against a man guilty of cohabitation “for every
day.” To be seen at the home of a plural wife, or to support his plural
family, was sufficient to create an offense against a man. Each “distinct
and separate violation of the law,” as interpreted by the judges, was a
separate offense and was liable for punishment.
This order of segregation, as it was called, drove many
of the leading brethren into exile, for it was virtually an announcement
that the violation of the Edmunds Law could be punished by life
imprisonment. Later, however, while the supreme court of the United States
upheld the Edmunds Law, it condemned the action of the judges in Utah in
establishing the “segregation” policy. This came in the habeas corpus case
of Elder Lorenzo Snow in February, 1887. While, however, this ruling was
being enforced, the First Presidency were in retirement and communicated
with the Saints from time to time in general epistles.
Sincerity of the “Mormon” People
With all the severity practiced against the “Mormon”
people under the Edmunds Law, yet it did not satisfy the enemies of the
Church. Without question many of the law makers had imputed to the
Latter-day Saints impure motives in the practice of plural marriage. They
now discovered through the prosecutions, which fell into the category of
persecutions, that it was a matter of the most sincere and sacred
character. Nevertheless they were determined to put an end to the
practice. Heavier penalties did not seem to avail, for the members of the
Church accepted plural marriage as a sacred religious rite, commanded by
the Lord, and they would rather die than break their covenants. The
actions of the government they looked upon as unconstitutional and an
attack upon their religious duties, and while they desired to be, and
were, loyal to the country, at the same time they desired to be loyal to
their God.
The Edmunds-Tucker Law
In March, 1887, Congress passed a supplemental act known
as the Edmunds-Tucker Law. President Grover Cleveland neither approved nor
disapproved of the act, so it became a law without his signature. Among
the many features of this measure were the disincorporation of the Church
of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, and the dissolving of the Perpetual
Emigration Fund Company, the property of which was escheated to the
government of the United States for the benefit of the common schools of
Utah. Female suffrage was abolished. It was made the duty of the attorney
general of the United States to proceed against the Church and wind up its
affairs and the title to all property—except that “no building or
grounds appurtenant thereto held and occupied exclusively for the purpose
of the worship of God, or parsonage, or burial ground shall be forfeited”
—be transferred and escheated to the United States.
Proceedings in Escheatment
At the instance of the attorney general of the United
States, suits were filed July 30, 1887, against the Church, and the
Perpetual Emigration Fund Company, and their property was confiscated.
November 5, 1887, United States Marshal Dyer was appointed receiver, and
took charge of the real and personal property of the Church to control it.
While this infamous measure was before Congress there
were many brave men who stood up in the face of the popular clamor and
almost united vindictiveness and hatred of the Church, and denounced the
high-handed proceedings. Such also had been the case when previous
legislation was enacted.
The government very graciously permitted the Church to
occupy the tithing office and historian’s office, at a yearly rental of
$2,400; and the Gardo house at $450 a month. The Temple Block was also
retained by the payment of a stipulated rent. All this happened in the
United States in the year 1887, not in Spain or Holland in the dark ages
or the days of the Inquisition.
Death of President John Taylor
Early in the year 1887, because of persecution,
President John Taylor and his counselors were forced into exile. The
trials and difficulties through which the Church was passing weighed
heavily upon the venerable President. He did not live to see the final
delivery of the Church property into the hands of a receiver. He died in
exile July 25, 1887, at the home of Thomas F. Roueche, at Kaysville, Davis
County, Utah, a martyr to the cause of truth which he espoused. At the
time of his passing his counselors were with him. His life had been one of
trial and suffering. He was a heroic character, strong in his convictions,
just in his dealings, uncompromising with evil. It is proper here to quote
the words of his counselors at the time of his death:
“President John Taylor has been killed by the cruelty
of officials who have, in this territory, misrepresented the government
of the United States. There is no room to doubt that if he had been
permitted to enjoy the comforts of home, the ministrations of his
family, the exercise to which he had been accustomed, but of which he
was deprived, he might have lived for many years yet. His blood stains
the clothes of men, who with insensate hate have offered rewards for his
arrest and have hounded him to the grave. History will yet call their
deeds by their right names” (Life of John Taylor
—Roberts, p. 414).
Notes
Chapter 51
Changes in Leadership
Following the death of President Taylor the duty of
presidency again devolved upon the council of the apostles, Counselors
Cannon and Smith resuming their places with the twelve. The apostles
continued to act in that position until the April conference in 1889, when
the First Presidency was again organized with Wilford Woodruff as
President. He selected George Q. Cannon and Joseph F. Smith as his
counselors. At the time of this organization President Woodruff was 82
years of age, but hale and vigorous. He was born in Farmington, Hartford
County, Connecticut, March 1, 1807; was baptized December 31, 1833, and
ordained an apostle
April 26, 1839. President Woodruff was a natural missionary and
accomplished a great work in England and various parts of the United
States.
The vacancies in the council of the twelve were not
filled until the October conference in 1889, when Marriner W. Merrill,
Anthon H. Lund and Abraham H. Cannon were called and ordained apostles.
Dedication of the Manti Temple
The temple at Manti, Sanpete County, was dedicated May
21, 1888, Elder Lorenzo Snow offering the prayer. The services were
repeated the two succeeding days. This was the third temple to be
dedicated in Utah. The site was chosen in June, 1875, by President Brigham
Young, and the excavation was begun in April, 1877. The corner stones were
laid April 14, 1879, with the usual fitting ceremonies. The building is
situated on a hill north-east of the city and is an imposing structure.
The Crusade Continues
The crusade against those who had entered plural
marriage continued after the death of President Taylor, but in some
respects with less severity. President Grover Cleveland pardoned a number
of the imprisoned men against whom the courts had been extremely severe.
These included Joseph H. Evans, a man of seventy, Charles Livingston and
Rudger Clawson. From this time on there was a more tolerant attitude
manifested by some of the officers. Nevertheless the government continued
with unyielding determination to suppress plural marriage, and more
drastic legislation was proposed by Congress.
The Crusade in Idaho
In Idaho the anti-“Mormon” feeling was intense. One
officer—who afterwards was honored with the position of United
States senator from Idaho—declared that he had selected “a jury that
would convict Jesus Christ.” Nor was this blasphemous expression the only
one uttered in that campaign. Men were hounded and treated in an inhuman
manner, and the boast was that “Mormons” would be convicted with or
without evidence before the courts.
The Idaho territorial legislature passed a law in 1885,
containing the “Idaho test oath,” which disfranchised all members of the
Church. It provided that electors should swear that they were neither
polygamists nor members of an organization which taught, advised or
encouraged the practice of polygamy. The supreme court of the United
States sustained this law in a decision given February 3, 1890. It was
enough to deprive a person of the franchise simply to declare that he was
a member of the Church.
The Strubble Bill
The enemies of the Church in Utah were greatly elated
over this decision of the supreme court in the “Idaho test oath” law. They
knew that no legislature in Utah would pass such a measure, but they had
hopes that Congress would, and thus the great majority of the people of
Utah would be disfranchised and their enemies be placed in control. A bill
called the Strubble Bill, following the lines of the Idaho law was
presented in Congress in 1890. Robert N. Baskin, who was as bitter against
the Saints as it was possible for him to be, brazenly declared that the
object was “to wrest from the hands of the Priesthood the political power
which it had wrongfully usurped and shamefully abused.” General John A.
McClernand, of the Utah Commission, refused to be a party to such
wickedness, and made a separate report condemning the proposed high-handed
legislation. This bill never became a law for several reasons. Many of the
conservative non-“Mormons” of Utah opposed the measure as being
detrimental to the interests of the territory, and petitioned Congress not
to pass it. Secretary of State James G. Blaine, used his influence to
defeat the measure for political reasons, but insisted that the Church do
something to relieve the situation.
President Woodruff’s Manifesto
While the Saints were in the midst of all these
difficulties and afflictions, President Wilford Woodruff sought the Lord
for relief. In answer to his earnest pleadings and constant petitions, the
word of the Lord came to him in a revelation suspending the practice of
plural marriage. The Latter-day Saints, with the feeling that the
anti-polygamy legislation was a restriction of their religious rights,
contested every move made by the government. When the supreme court
sustained these laws, there was nothing left for the Church to do but
submit or stand as violators of the law. They have never felt that the
action of the courts were just, nor did they feel that it was within their
power to suspend a commandment given to them by revelation from the Lord.
The “manifesto” of President Woodruff brought relief. The people had done
their duty. The Lord gave them the commandment and only he could authorize
its suspension. President Woodruff, writing in his journal September 25,
1890 said:
“I have arrived at a point in the history of my life
as the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
where I am under the necessity of acting for the temporal salvation of
the Church. The United States government has taken a stand and passed
laws to destroy the Latter-day Saints on the subject of polygamy or
patriarchal marriage, and after praying to the Lord and feeling
inspired, I have issued the following proclamation which is sustained by
my counselors and the twelve apostles.”
The same day the manifesto was published as follows:
“OFFICIAL DECLARATION.”
“To Whom it May Concern:
“Press dispatches having been sent for political
purposes from Salt Lake City, which have been widely published, to the
effect that the Utah Commission, in their recent report to the secretary
of the interior, alleged that plural marriages are still being
solemnized, and that forty or more such marriages have been contracted
in Utah since last June or during the past year: also that in public
discourses the leaders of the Church have taught, encouraged, and urged
the continuance of the practice of polygamy;“I, therefore, as President of the Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter-day Saints, do hereby, in the most solemn manner,
declare that these charges are false. We are not teaching polygamy or
plural marriage, nor permitting any person to enter into its practice,
and I deny that either forty or any other number of plural marriages
have during that period been solemnized in our temples or in any other
place in the territory.“One case has been reported in which the parties
alleged that the marriage was performed in the Endowment House, in Salt
Lake City, in the spring of 1889, but I have not been able to learn who
performed the ceremony. Whatever was done in this matter was without my
knowledge. In consequence of this alleged occurrence, the Endowment
House was, by my instruction, taken down without delay.“Inasmuch as laws have been enacted by Congress,
forbidding plural marriages, which laws have been pronounced
constitutional by the court of the Last Resort, I hereby declare my
intention to submit to those laws, and to use my influence with the
members of the Church over which I preside to have them do likewise.“There is nothing in my teachings to the Church, or in
those of my associates, during the time specified, which can be
reasonably construed to inculcate or encourage polygamy, and when any
elder of the Church has used language which appeared to convey any such
teaching, he has been promptly reproved. And I now publicly declare that
my advice to the Latter-day Saints is to refrain from contracting any
marriage forbidden by the law of the land.“Wilford Woodruff.”
“President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.”
The Manifesto Sustained
At the conference of the Church held in October
following, the manifesto was presented to the congregation and on motion
by President Lorenzo Snow of the council of the apostles, was accepted by
the Latter-day Saints by unanimous vote. Thus it became binding upon the
members of the Church.
Following this action President George Q. Cannon
delivered a discourse, reviewing the history of the anti-polygamy
legislation and justified the action of President Woodruff on the
following grounds: First, when a commandment is given to the children of
men, and they are hindered by their enemies, the Lord accepts their
offering. Second, the authority which gave the commandment had the right
to revoke. In the course of his remarks he quoted verses 49 and 50 of
section 124 in the Doctrine and Covenants.
President Woodruff followed the remarks of President
Cannon and in part said:
“I want to say to all Israel that the step which I
have taken in issuing this manifesto has not been done without earnest
prayer before the Lord. . . . I am not ignorant of the
feelings that have been engendered through the course I have pursued.
But I have done my duty, and the nation of which we form a part must be
responsible for that which has been done in relation to this principle.“The Lord has required at our hands many things that
we have not done, many things that we were prevented from doing. The
Lord required us to build a temple in Jackson County. We were prevented
by violence from doing it. . . . It is not wisdom for us
to go forth and carry out this principle against the laws of the nation.
. . . The Lord has given us commandments concerning many
things, and we have carried them out as far as we could; but when we
cannot do it, we are justified. . . . The Lord will never
permit me or any other man who stands as the President of this Church to
lead you astray. It is not in the program. It is not in the mind of God.
If I were to attempt that, the Lord would move me out of my place.”
Result of the Manifesto
Following the issuance of the manifesto the sentiment
grew that those who had entered into plural marriages before that date
should not be interfered with, and men were not to be compelled to desert
their wives and children. In time the two political parties, the “People’s
Party” composed mostly of members of the Church, and the “Liberal Party”
composed of the enemies of the Church, disbanded, and the people joined
the two great national parties, the Democrats and Republicans, without
regard to religious affiliation. However, the more rabid anti-“Mormons”
held on to their animosities and organization until the opposition to them
among non-“Mormons” was so great that they could resist no longer.
The Granting of Amnesty
December 19, 1891, the First Presidency and apostles
petitioned for amnesty. This petition was endorsed by the governor, Arthur
L. Thomas, and Charles S. Zane, who had again become chief justice, and
many leading “Gentiles.” It was read before the senate committee on
territories and became a part of the published record of that body.
President Benjamin Harrison, who a short time before had visited Utah, on
January 4, 1893, issued a proclamation of amnesty to polygamists for past
offenses, limited to those who entered into that relation before November
1, 1890. The Utah commission, acting on the pardon of the President, ruled
that the restrictions against voters in the territory should be removed.
Laying the Capstone and Dedication of the Salt Lake
Temple
One of the great events in the history of the Latter-day
Saints was the dedication of the Salt Lake Temple, April 6, 1893. As
previously stated the corner stones were laid forty years before—
April 6, 1853. The capstone had been laid April 6, 1892, by President
Wilford Woodruff, in the presence of a vast congregation numbering about
forty thousand people. After the announcement from the architect from the
top of the building that the capstone was ready, President Woodruff
stepped before the people and said:
“Attention, all the House of Israel, and all ye
nations of the earth. We will now lay the top stone of the Temple of our
God, the foundation of which was laid and dedicated by the prophet, seer
and revelator, Brigham Young.”
He then pressed an electric button and the stone was
laid. A mighty shout, of “Hosanna! Hosanna! Hosanna! to God and the Lamb!
Amen! Amen! Amen!” under the direction of President Lorenzo Snow, went up
from the people and was repeated three times.
The dedicatory services, which commenced April 6, 1893,
continued several days, and each day the prayer was repeated, for the
benefit of the great number of members of the Church who, because of the
limited space, could not attend the first services in the building. The
ceremonies were impressive and many of the Saints saw visions of heavenly
beings and other manifestations during the dedication.
The Tabernacle Choir at the World’s Fair
At the World’s Columbian Exposition, held in Chicago in
1893, the Salt Lake Tabernacle Choir entered the competition in the great
choral contest which took place early in September, and were successful in
winning the second prize. It was the general opinion of those who heard
the contest that if it had not been for prejudice they would have received
the first honors. On their way to Chicago and returning the choir gave
concerts in the large cities, which was a means of allaying much prejudice
against the Church.
The Church and the Parliament of Religions
During this Exposition at Chicago, a World’s Parliament
of Religions was held, commencing September 11. The Church of Jesus Christ
of Latter-day Saints was not invited to participate, but the Church
authorities deemed it proper to seek representation and steps to that end
were taken. Elder Brigham H. Roberts, of the first council of seventies,
was selected to represent the Church at the parliament. When he requested
the privilege of taking part and of speaking before that assembly, where
Christians, Mohammedans, Jews and Pagans, had been given a public hearing,
the privilege was denied him. The manifestation of bigotry was very
marked, and the Church was given to understand it was “not of the world.”
Elder Roberts was granted the privilege of delivering a paper in one of
the committee rooms which would seat about fifty persons. This privilege
Elder Roberts very properly declined. The matter did not end there,
however, as Elder Roberts took the matter up in the press, and the bigotry
of the officials of the parliament was exposed, and the Church was
benefited by the advertisement thus received.
Statehood for Utah
Delegate Joseph L. Rawlins of Utah presented a bill in
the house of representatives, September 6, 1893, entitled “An Act to
Enable the People of Utah to Form a Constitution and State Government and
to be Admitted into the Union on an Equal Footing with the Original
States.” The bill met some opposition, one congressman (Morse of
Massachusetts) declaring the people of Utah were “criminals and
vagabonds.” The bill, however, passed the house, December 13, 1893, and
the senate in July, 1894, and was signed by President Grover Cleveland.
Utah had made several attempts to obtain statehood and several
constitutional conventions had been held, but the opposition against the
“Mormon” people each time defeated the endeavor. Now both “Mormons” and
non-“Mormons” supported the movement, which was successful.
The Constitutional Convention
In the election held November 6, 1894, for delegates to
the constitutional convention, the Republicans were successful. The
constitutional convention met March 4, 1895, in Salt Lake City, and
organized by electing John Henry Smith, a member of the council of twelve
apostles, as president. “Mormons” and “Gentiles” who had opposed each
other in the past sat side by side in this convention for sixty-six days,
framing the constitution of the state of Utah. When it was presented to
the people it was ratified by an overwhelming vote. President Cleveland
issued a proclamation, January 4, 1896, and Utah entered the great Union
of states. Heber M. Wells, son of Daniel H. Wells, was elected the first
governor, and Charles S. Zane the first chief justice of the newly created
state.
The Escheated Property Returned
In September, 1893, Delegate Joseph L. Rawlins presented
in Congress a resolution for the restoration of the personal property of
the Church. The resolution was favorably acted upon by Congress and
President Cleveland signed it October 25. The real estate, escheated to
the government, was not returned until three years later. In the last
territorial legislature, in 1894, Mr. Charles S. Varian, formerly United
States attorney, presented a memorial to Congress asking for this
restoration, but the matter was not decided until after Utah obtained
statehood. President Cleveland, March 28, 1896, approved of a memorial to
this effect presented by one of Utah’s representatives in the senate and
which had passed both the senate and the house of representatives.
The Pioneer Jubilee
After Utah became a state, an era of good feeling
prevailed among all the people. Governor Heber M. Wells recommended in one
of his messages to the legislature, that the state hold an inter-mountain
fair, or jubilee, during the month of July, 1897, it being fifty years
from the entrance of the pioneers into the Salt Lake Valley. This
recommendation was approved and a committee was appointed to prepare for
the celebration. On the first day (July 20) of the celebration a monument
which had been erected at the intersection of Main and South Temple
Streets, Salt Lake City, in honor of Brigham Young and the pioneers, was
unveiled and dedicated, by President Wilford Woodruff, one of the
pioneers. The statue of President Young, which is on a base of Utah
granite, was designed by Cyrus E. Dallin, a Utah-born artist, and was
presented to the state by the Brigham Young Memorial Association, the
funds having been raised by popular subscription. James H. Moyle made the
presentation speech, and Governor Wells the speech of acceptance. Judge
Charles C. Goodwin, editor of the Salt Lake Tribune
, delivered an oration, and remarks were made by Brigham Young, Jr.,
the oldest surviving son of President Young. The celebration continued
until the close of Pioneer Day, with parades, speeches, music and other
exercises. A badge of honor, made of gold and artistically designed, was
presented to each of the surviving pioneers of 1847, who were the honored
guests of the occasion.
Death of President Woodruff
One year later, July 24, 1898, the Pioneer Square—
where the stockade was built in 1847—was dedicated as a public park.
President Woodruff delivered his last public address at this celebration.
A few days later he departed for the Pacific coast hoping to benefit his
health. He died at the home of Colonel Isaac Trumbo in San Francisco,
September 2, 1898. He had been very anxious to live to see the Church out
of debt, but this was not his privilege. Due to the escheatment of its
property, and the persecutions during the crusade, the Church was placed
in financial straits, but it was left for his successor to remedy the evil.
President Woodruff’s remains were brought to Salt Lake
City, where a public funeral was held in the tabernacle, September 8, and
his memory was honored by all the citizens of the state. President
Woodruff, at the time of his death, was in his ninety-second year. His
life was one of marked simplicity and virtue. He served for many years as
Church historian, and kept remarkable journals, recording in detail all
important events of which he was a witness.
Chapter 52
The Presidency Re-organized
Eleven days after the death of President Wilford
Woodruff the apostles met in council and re-organized the First
Presidency. Lorenzo Snow, then in his 85th year, was sustained as
President of the Church, and selected the same counselors who had served
with President Woodruff. The reason for this immediate action in
reorganizing the First Presidency was a statement by President Woodruff,
shortly before his death, that “it was not the will of the Lord that in
the future there should be a lengthy period elapsed between the death of
the president and the re-organization of the First Presidency.” At the
October conference (1898) the usual procedure was followed in presenting
the new officers of the presidency, and all the authorities of the Church
were unanimously sustained. Elder Rudger Clawson, president of the Box
Elder Stake, was called to the apostleship and was ordained, October 10.
President Lorenzo Snow
President Lorenzo Snow was born April 30, 1814, in
Mantua, Portage County, Ohio. In June, 1836, he was baptized by John F.
Boynton, and the following winter was ordained an elder. He immediately
entered the ministry and was laboring in Kentucky when the Saints were
expelled from Missouri. In the early forties he labored in Great Britain,
his fields being Manchester, Liverpool, Birmingham and London. After the
departure of most of the apostles from that mission he acted as assistant
to Elder Parley P. Pratt, who presided over the British Mission. He
returned to America in 1843 and made his home at Nauvoo. In 1849 he was
called to the apostleship, and took a mission to Italy, where he
introduced the work, but met with little success. During the anti-polygamy
crusade he was sentenced by Judge Orlando W. Powers, under the
“segregation” ruling, to serve three terms of imprisonment of six months
each, making a period of eighteen months, and to pay three fines of three
hundred dollars each. The supreme court of Utah confirmed the sentence and
an appeal was taken to the court of last resort. After he had served
eleven months of his imprisonment the supreme court of the United States
reversed the ruling made in his case, denying the right of the Utah judges
to inflict punishment by “segregation,” and he was released from
confinement. This ruling also released others who had been illegally
sentenced by the judges of the Utah courts. President Snow was sustained
as the president of the Twelve Apostles when the First Presidency was
re-organized in 1889, and was also called to preside in the Salt Lake
Temple when that building was opened for work (1893), which position he
retained until his death.
The Roberts Case
At the general election held November 8, 1898, Brigham
H. Roberts (Democrat) and a member of the presiding council of the
seventies, was elected as Utah’s representative in Congress, and Robert N.
Baskin was elected to the Utah supreme court. During the campaign much was
said by the enemies of Mr. Roberts, because he had a plural family, and
the agitation became nationwide. It had been understood when Utah became a
state that there should be no more plural marriages, and the Utah
constitution contained a provision as follows:
“That perfect toleration of religious sentiment shall
be secured and that no inhabitant of said state shall ever be molested
in person or property on account of his or her mode of religious
worship; provided, That polygamous or plural marriages are forever
prohibited.”
However it was not understood that those who had entered
into that relation should be barred from political rights. President
Grover Cleveland, in September, 1894, by proclamation, restored all
political and civil rights to those who had been disfranchised by the
anti-polygamy legislation. Similar action had previously been taken by
President Benjamin Harrison. John Henry Smith, president of the
constitutional convention, was a polygamist, and Brigham H. Roberts also
served in that body without any question of opposition, and helped to
frame the constitution which prohibited plural marriage in the state.
Opposition of the Ministers
The opposition against Congressman Roberts was led by
the Ministerial Alliance of Salt Lake City, Attorney A. T. Schroeder,
and the Salt Lake Tribune, which at that time
was the organ of the Republican party. Mr. Charles C. Goodwin, editor of
the Tribune, had served with B. H. Roberts
in the constitutional convention without a thought of opposition. It
appeared now that the old question was to be revived through religious and
political hate, and that the harmony which had prevailed was to come to an
end. The Ministerial Alliance met December 6, 1898, and prepared an
address, which was signed by twenty-four “ministers of the Gospel,” “most
earnestly” calling upon the people of the United States to join them in a
protest against the seating of Congressman-elect Roberts of Utah. They
declared that the “Mormon” Church, in the election of Congressman Roberts,
had broken its pledge with the government.
Statement of President Snow
In a telegram to the New York World
, December 29, 1898, President Snow stated, officially and
emphatically, in answer to the many false reports, that plural marriages
had ceased with the issuance of the manifesto by President Woodruff, and
that the Church had nothing to do with the nomination and election of B.
H. Roberts, that matter being entirely a secular and political
affair. The record of the election showed that B. H. Roberts received
greater support from the non-“Mormons” than he did from the “Mormon”
people.
Declaration of Senator Rawlins
In answer to the false accusations, Senator Joseph L.
Rawlins (non-“Mormon”) stated:
“That polygamists should be disqualified to vote or to
hold office was no part of the compact between the state of Utah and the
United States. In territorial elections polygamists were so
disqualified. But Congress purposely and knowingly wiped away all such
disqualifications as to the very first election to be held under the
enabling act, namely, the election of delegates to the Constitutional
Convention.”
Congressman Roberts Excluded
When B. H. Roberts was called to the bar of the
house to be sworn in, Mr. Robert W. Tayler of Ohio arose and moved that
the question of the right of the representative from Utah be referred to a
committee of nine members of the house, and until such committee made
report, the said B. H. Roberts should not be sworn in, or permitted
to occupy a seat. The motion was carried, and after an investigation of
six weeks, seven of the members of the committee reported in favor of his
exclusion which should be determined by a majority vote; the other two
members of the committee favored admission of the Utah member, and then
expulsion afterwards. In the meantime many petitions from all parts of the
United States poured into Congress asking for his expulsion. January 25,
1900, the matter came to a vote and bigotry prevailed. Congressman-elect
Roberts was excluded by a vote of 244 to 50 and 36 not voting. A number of
those who voted for the majority report confessed that they voted against
their consciences and in favor of public clamor that their own political
lives might be saved. Having been given a chance to make a defense, B.
H. Roberts spoke, making a vigorous and telling protest against the
bigoted action proposed against him.
The Issue of Church Bonds
Due to the financial difficulties in which the Church
was placed because of continued prosecution and persecution, it became
necessary for some action to be taken. It was decided that bonds be
issued, and this was done in the sum of one million dollars. The bonds
were taken up by the people at home and local interests, and by this aid
the Church was able to meet its many obligations and was saved from
financial embarrassment.
The Law of Tithing
The administration of President Lorenzo Snow was noted
particularly for the teaching of the law of tithing, and the great reform
among the members of the Church in relation to that principle. This reform
was inaugurated in the spring of 1899, while the presidency were visiting
the various settlements of the Church in southern Utah. On the return
journey from St. George the law of tithing was made the special theme.
This topic was continued in the sessions of the Mutual Improvement
conference held the latter part of May, and it became the watchword, or
slogan, of the various stakes. A resolution was unanimously adopted in the
Mutual conference, as follows:
“Resolved: That we accept
the doctrine of tithing, as now presented by President Snow, as the
present word and will of the Lord unto us, and we do accept it with all
our hearts; we will ourselves observe it, and we will do all in our
power to get the Latter-day Saints to do likewise.”
After a few remarks by Elder Francis M. Lyman in
relation to the resolution, President Snow remarked: “Brethren, the God of
our fathers Abraham, Isaac and Jacob bless you. Every man who is here, who
has made this promise, will be saved in the Celestial Kingdom. God bless
you. Amen.”
The Solemn Fast Day
Following the Mutual conference, a solemn assembly of
all the general authorities and the officers of the various stakes, was
held in the Salt Lake Temple, Sunday, July 2, 1899. The day was also
observed as a general fast day according to the custom of the Church.1
The law of tithing was discussed among other important topics,
and here also a resolution was adopted by the assembled brethren, six
hundred and twenty-three officers of the Church being present, that they
would covenant with the Lord to observe this sacred law of tithing, and
teach the Saints to do the same. From that time forth the paying of tithes
and offerings on the part of the members was observed with increased
interest, although there still are many who do not faithfully observe this
law.
Celebration of Mission Jubilees
The fiftieth anniversary of the introduction of the
Gospel into Scandinavia was celebrated with fitting ceremonies, Thursday,
June 14, 1900, in the assembly hall, Salt Lake City. Elder Anthon H. Lund,
of the council of the apostles, presided. The festivities continued until
the 17th of June.
A similar celebration was held in December, 1900, at
Honolulu, Hawaii, in commemoration of the opening of the mission in the
Hawaiian Islands. President George Q. Cannon, one of the first
missionaries to the land, was present as the guest of honor. The Saints
from the various islands assembled and engaged in a time of feasting and
refreshing and were instructed by President Cannon and many others.
The Scofield Disaster
A sad occurrence which cast a cloud of gloom over Utah,
was the explosion in Mine number 4, at Winter Quarters, near Scofield,
Carbon County, May 1, 1900. About two hundred miners were killed, many of
whom were members of the Church. Elders George Teasdale, Heber J. Grant,
and Reed Smoot, of the council of the twelve attended the services which
were held at Scofield, Sunday, May 6, 1900. Governor Heber M. Wells
appealed to the public for aid for the bereaved families and the people of
the state responded nobly.
The Japanese Mission
An event of great interest which occurred near the close
of the ministry of President Snow, was the opening of a mission in Japan.
In keeping with the commandment to preach the Gospel in all the world,
President Snow was led to send missionaries to the little brown people of
the far East. Elder Heber J. Grant, of the council of the apostles, was
chosen February 14, 1901, to open that mission. Later Elders Horace S.
Ensign, Louis A. Kelsch and Alma O. Taylor, were called to assist in that
labor. These brethren departed for Japan, July 24, 1901, and arrived in
Yokohama, August 12. The work of teaching the natives was slow because of
the many centuries of pagan teaching and the difficulty the elders had in
learning the language. After the return of the other brethren, Elder
Taylor remained in that land as president of the mission for nine years.
Work is still being conducted among the Japanese.
Death of President Snow
When the October conference was held in 1901, President
Snow was ill and unable to attend the opening sessions. Sunday afternoon,
the third and closing day (Oct. 6), he was present and, though somewhat
feeble, made extended remarks. At the close of his address the general
authorities were sustained. Joseph F. Smith was presented as first
counselor in the Presidency—President George Q. Cannon having died
April 12, 1901, in California—and Rudger Clawson was presented as
second counselor. These brethren, however, were not set apart to these
positions, for President Snow returned from the conference and was
confined to his room in the Bee Hive House, where, four days later (Oct.
10), he died. Funeral services were held in the tabernacle on the 13th,
after which the body was taken by special train to Brigham City, President
Snow’s former home, and there interred, in the presence of the general
authorities of the Church and a vast concourse of people.
Notes
One day each month is set apart by the Church as a fast day. Before
the administration of President Wilford Woodruff the first Thursday in
each month was set apart for this purpose. December 6, 1896, a change in
the day was made and the first Sunday of each month has been observed as a
general fast day for the members of the Church since that time.
Chapter 53
The Presidency Re-organized
At the regular weekly meeting of the apostles, held in
the Salt Lake Temple, October 17, 1901, the First Presidency was
re-organized. Joseph F. Smith, the senior apostle, was sustained as
President of the Church, and he selected John R. Winder and Anthon H. Lund
as his counselors. Brigham Young, Jr., was chosen president of the council
of the twelve apostles. John R. Winder, the first counselor in the First
Presidency, was at the time of his appointment second counselor to
Presiding Bishop William B. Preston. Anthon H. Lund was a member of the
council of apostles. Both counselors were men of wide experience, careful
and conservative, and well fitted for this new calling. One week later
(Oct. 24) Hyrum Mack Smith, eldest son of President Joseph F. Smith, was
called to fill the vacancy in the council of the apostles.
A Special Conference
A special conference of the Church was held in the
tabernacle, November 10, 1901, and the general authorities of the Church
were sustained by the vote of the people. Each quorum of the Priesthood
voted separately, and then the entire body of the Saints, according to the
regular custom when a new First Presidency is sustained.
President Joseph F. Smith
November 13, 1838, Joseph F. Smith was born at Far West,
Missouri. A few days before his birth his father Hyrum Smith and his
uncle, Joseph Smith the Prophet, and others, had been taken prisoners by
the mob-militia of Missouri on the false charge of treason, and were under
sentence to be shot. As a child Joseph F. Smith passed through the trying
scenes of Missouri and Illinois, and in 1848 (Sept. 23) he entered the
Salt Lake Valley with his mother. Although but a boy nine years of age, he
drove an ox team across the plains from the Missouri River. In 1852 his
mother, Mary Fielding Smith, died, and two years later, May 27, 1854, he
left for a mission to the Hawaiian Islands, when but fifteen years of age.
He performed active and faithful missionary service in that land and later
in Great Britain and was ordained an apostle by President Brigham Young,
July 1, 1866. October 8, 1867, he was chosen as one of the council of the
twelve, succeeding Amasa M. Lyman. With the exception of the interim
between the administration of President Taylor and that of President
Woodruff, he served as a member of the First Presidency from October,
1880, until the death of President Snow.
The Bureau of Information
An important step in the missionary work of the Church
was the opening of the “Bureau of Information and Church Literature,”
August 4, 1902, on the temple block. A small building for the
entertainment of strangers and as a storehouse for literature was erected
in 1902, and the work was placed under the direction of Benjamin Goddard,
Thomas Hull, Arnold H. Schulthess and Josiah Burrows. About seventy-five
members of the Church were called to act as guides and entertain visitors.
Literature was freely distributed and much prejudice was removed. The
first year more than one hundred and fifty thousand persons visited the
block, and eighteen or twenty years later over four hundred thousand
people, on the average, passed through the grounds annually. In 1904 a
more commodious building was erected which has been added to from time to
time until now an excellent building stands upon the ground for the
benefit and comfort of strangers.
The Reed Smoot Case
January 20, 1903, the legislature of Utah elected Reed
Smoot United States senator. He had been a candidate before, but stepped
aside in favor of another. April 8, 1900, he was called to the
apostleship, and the anti-“Mormon” element in Utah made this a pretext for
entering a protest against his being seated. As early as November 24,
1903, when it became known that he would be a candidate, the Ministerial
Alliance, an organization of Protestant ministers of Salt Lake City,
adopted resolutions in protest of his candidacy. Their grounds were that
he was an apostle of the “Mormon” Church, and believed in polygamy. They
had been successful in eliminating B. H. Roberts from political
office in 1900, and this gave them encouragement to press the matter
further in their campaign to disfranchise all the elders of the Church,
and if successful, eventually all members of the Church. B. H.
Roberts was denied his seat on the grounds that he was a polygamist; Reed
Smoot was to be eliminated because he “believed in polygamy” and was an
apostle of the Church. It was commonly reported that if Reed Smoot could
be denied a seat in the senate, then any member of the Church who had been
through the temple could also be deprived of his franchise, and this was
the aim of these reverend gentlemen and their associates.
Protest of Citizens
January 25, 1903, nineteen citizens1 of Salt
Lake City signed and forwarded to the senate of the United States a formal
protest asking for the expulsion of Reed Smoot from the senate.2
In substantiation of these charges the protestants
quoted from various sources, including many newspaper reports utterly
unreliable and false upon their very face. The Rev. John L. Leilich also
made separate affidavit stating among other falsehoods that Reed Smoot was
a polygamist. As this charge was untrue the reverend gentleman was unable
to prove his statements.
Senator Smoot Makes Reply
To all these charges Senator Smoot made full and
complete denial in an answer in the District of Columbia, January 4, 1904.
March 5, 1903, he had been sworn in as a senator and his case was referred
to the committee on privileges and elections of which Julius C. Burrows of
Michigan was chairman. Mr. Robert W. Tayler, of Ohio, who gained some
prominence and notoriety in the case of B. H. Roberts, was the
attorney for the protestants. Senator Smoot was represented by A. S.
Worthington, of Washington, and Waldemar Van Cott, of Salt Lake City.
The Case Before the Senate
The case was first considered by the committee on
privileges and elections, January 16, 1904, and continued before that
committee until June 1906. The chairman, Julius C. Burrows, and other
members of the committee manifested a spirit of extreme hatred in the
case. It was apparent from the beginning that it was the Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter-day Saints that was on trial before the nation, not
Senator Reed Smoot. Many witnesses were called, including President Joseph
F. Smith and other leaders of the Church, who were treated with very
little consideration by the majority of the committee members. Thousands
of petitions asking for Reed Smoot’s expulsion poured into the senate from
all over the United States, and the spirit of prejudice ran high. During
the two years of the investigation the Church was thoroughly advertised
before the world. The press of the country, seeking for the sensational,
grasped at every item of evidence detrimental to the interest of the
Church and magnified much of the testimony, coloring it with additional
falsehood. Nevertheless there appeared from time to time friendly comments
and articles in various quarters where men were big and broad enough to
face the prejudice of the world. It can be said in perfect truth that the
investigation, while carried on in the spirit of extreme hatred, resulted
beneficially for the Church.
The Case Decided
June 11, 1906, the committee made report to the senate.
The majority report, which was adverse to Senator Smoot, was signed by
Chairman J. C. Burrows, and supported by Senators J. P.
Dolliver, Edmund W. Pettus, Fred T. Dubois, Joseph Bailey, Lee S. Overman,
and William A. Clark. They stated that “the more deliberately and
carefully the testimony taken in the investigation is considered, the more
irresistibly it leads to the conclusion that the facts stated in the
protest are true.”
The minority report, signed by Senators Joseph B.
Foraker, Albert J. Beveridge, William P. Dillingham, Albert J. Hopkins and
Philander C. Knox, held to the opposite view.
The case was called up in the senate, December 13, 1906,
and continued before that body—a large number of the senators making
speeches—until February 20, 1907, when the final vote was taken. The
resolution was amended so that it required the concurrence of two thirds
of the senators present. The vote stood yeas 28, nays 42, and 20 not
voting; consequently the result of the vote was that the resolution was
rejected, and Senator Smoot retained his seat.
The “American Party”
In January 1901, Thomas Kearns, a rich mining man, was
elected by the legislature to the United States senate to fill a four-year
term, which had been vacant for two years because the previous legislature
failed to elect a senator. Mr. Kearns was very anxious to be returned to
the senate, and sought the support of President Joseph F. Smith—in
other words the support of the Church—which was not given, and he
was informed that the Church was not in politics. Having obtained control
of the Salt Lake Tribune he made it his personal
organ of hate against the Church in general and President Joseph F. Smith
in particular. He and others of like character, in the autumn of 1904,
organized the “American Party.” The excuse offered for this political
party was the investigation going on in the Reed Smoot case. This
anti-“Mormon” political organization endured from 1904 until 1911, and
during those years captured the machinery of Salt Lake City. A campaign of
vindictive falsehood was conducted which was a disgrace and a foul blot on
the state of Utah. During this time the Tribune
maliciously cartooned, and wickedly vilified President Joseph F. Smith in
its columns in a manner that would not have been tolerated anywhere
outside of Utah. Finally, even anti-“Mormons” sickened of the condition,
and the better element of the “American Party” joined with other citizens
and put an end to the obnoxious condition.
President Smith’s Attitude
The only reply President Joseph F. Smith made to these
vicious and daily attacks, was to express himself as follows:
“I feel in my heart to forgive all men in the broad
sense that God requires of me to forgive all men, and I desire to love
my neighbor as myself; and to this extent I bear no malice towards any
of the children of my Father. But there are enemies to the work of the
Lord, as there were enemies of the Son of God. There are those who speak
only evil of the Latter-day Saints. There are those—and they
abound largely in our midst—who will shut their eyes to every
virtue and to every good thing connected with this latter-day work, and
will pour out floods of falsehood and misrepresentation against the
people of God. I forgive them for this. I leave them in the hand of the
just Judge.”
The Case of John W. Taylor and M. F. Cowley
While the investigation at Washington was going on,
Elders John W. Taylor and Matthias F. Cowley were requested by the senate
committee as witnesses. President Smith was asked to locate them and have
them go to Washington. In answer to his appeal they declined to go. It was
discovered that they were out of harmony with the attitude of the Church
regarding the manifesto of President Woodruff. They maintained that the
manifesto applied to the United States only. However, the attitude of the
Church was that it applied to the entire world.
Official Statement of President Smith
This led to the discovery that some plural marriages had
been entered into contrary to the announcement of President Woodruff, and
also a statement made by President Lorenzo Snow. Therefore, President
Smith, at the general conference, April 6, 1904, made the following
official statement:
“Inasmuch as there are numerous reports in circulation
that plural marriages have been entered into, contrary to the official
declaration of President Woodruff of September 24, 1890, commonly called
the manifesto, which was issued by President Woodruff, and adopted by
the Church at its general conference, October 6, 1890, which forbade any
marriage violative of the law of the land, I, Joseph F. Smith, President
of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, hereby affirm and
declare that no such marriages have been solemnized with the sanction,
consent, or knowledge of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.“And I hereby announce that all such marriages are
prohibited, and if any officer or member of the Church shall assume to
solemnize or enter into any such marriage, he will be deemed in
transgression against the Church, and will be liable to be dealt with
according to the rules and regulations thereof and excommunicated
therefrom.(Signed) “Joseph F. Smith.”
“President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.”
This statement, on motion of Francis M. Lyman, was
presented to the conference and unanimously adopted. The agitation which
followed led to the resignation, October 28, 1905, of Elders John W.
Taylor and Matthias F. Cowley from the council of the apostles.
Dedication of the Joseph Smith Monument
Monday, December 18, 1905, President Joseph F. Smith and
about twenty-five others, including a number of the general authorities of
the Church, left Salt Lake City, for Sharon, Vermont, to dedicate a
monument on the farm where Joseph Smith the Prophet was born. This
beautiful monument, with a polished granite shaft thirty-eight and
one-half feet high—one foot for every year of the Prophet’s life
—had been erected under the direction of Elder Junius F. Wells.
December 23, 1905, the one hundredth anniversary of the Prophet’s birth,
it was dedicated and unveiled, President Smith offering the prayer. A
short time before this event the Mack farm, on which the monument stands,
had been purchased by the Church and a cottage built on the spot where the
old home stood in which the Prophet was born. Subsequently the Church
purchased the Smith farm and Sacred Grove, in Manchester township, New
York.
President Smith Visits Europe
In the summer of 1906, President Joseph F. Smith and
Presiding Bishop Charles W. Nibley went to Europe and spent some time in
each of the missions. This was the first time a President of the Church,
while holding that office, had stood on Europe’s soil. It proved to be a
great blessing to the Saints abroad and encouraged and built them up in
the faith. An incident worthy of record which occurred on that trip was
the remarkable healing of John Roothoff, a boy eleven years of age,
residing in Rotterdam. The youth was blind, but learning that President
Smith would be present he said to his mother: “If you will take me with
you to meeting and he (President Smith) will look into my eyes, I believe
they will be healed.” He was permitted to accompany his mother, and at the
close of the services President Smith greeted each individual and shook
hands with them. As the mother presented her son, President Smith raised
the bandage on his eyes, and blessed him. When he returned home the boy
said: “Mamma, my eyes are well, I can’t feel any more pain. I can see now,
and far, too.”
The Address to the World
At the general conference of the Church in April, 1907,
which was held shortly after the settlement of the case against Senator
Smoot, the First Presidency of the Church issued an “Address to the World”
which was read to, and adopted by, the conference. It set forth clearly
the attitude of the Church respecting many matters which had been
discussed during the hearing at Washington, and was also a reply to
numerous magazine articles which appeared about that time written
expressly for the injury of the Church.
It was stated in this address, in answer to the many
false accusations, that the Church had respectfully submitted to the law
enacted against plural marriage. “If it is urged that there have been
instances of the violation of the anti-polygamy laws,” the document read,
“the plain answer is that in every state and nation there are individuals
who violate law in spite of all the vigilance that can be exercised; but
it does not follow that the integrity of a community or a state is
destroyed, because of such individual transgressions. All we ask is that
the same common-sense judgment be exercised in relation to our community
that is accorded to other communities.” It was also declared that the
Church stood for the “absolute separation of Church and State; no
domination of the State by the Church; no State interference with the
functions of the Church, or with the free exercise of religion; the
absolute freedom of the individual from the domination of ecclesiastical
authority in political affairs; the equality of all churches before the
law.
“The reaffirmation of this doctrine and policy, however,
is predicated upon the express understanding that politics in the States
where our people reside shall be conducted as in other parts of the Union;
that there shall be no interference by the State with the Church, nor with
the free exercise of religion. Should political parties make war upon the
Church, or menace the civil, political, or religious rights of its members
as such—against a policy of that kind, by any political party or set
of men whatsoever, we assert the inherent right of self-preservation for
the Church, and her right to call upon all her children, and upon all who
love justice, and desire the perpetuation of religious liberty, to come to
her aid, to stand with her until the danger shall have passed. And this
openly, submitting the justice of our cause to the enlightened judgment of
our fellow men, should such an issue unhappily arise. We desire to live in
peace and confidence with our fellow citizens of all political parties and
of all religions.”
Changes in the Presidency
President John R. Winder, first counselor in the First
Presidency, died March 27, 1910. At the general conference in April
following, Anthon H. Lund was advanced to the position of first counselor,
and John Henry Smith was chosen as second counselor in the presidency.
President John Henry Smith died October 13, 1911, and Elder Charles W.
Penrose was chosen to succeed him, in the following December. The
presiding patriarch, John Smith, died November 6, 1911, and his grandson,
Hyrum G. Smith, was sustained in that calling at the general conference of
the Church, April 6, 1912.
The Saints in Mexico
During the year 1912, on account of civil war in Mexico
and the constant raid of banditti and guerillas, the members of the Church
residing in the Juarez Stake were robbed and persecuted and finally forced
to seek refuge in the United States. With the hope that they would again
return to their homes most of them located near the border, but as time
passed and the condition did not improve, a large number moved away and
located in other stakes, abandoning their property in Mexico. Some who
remained near the border have again returned to their homes, and there is
some prospect (1921) that they may be partially reimbursed for their
losses.
The World War
In the summer of 1914, Archduke Franz Ferdinand, heir to
the throne of Austria-Hungary, was murdered by a Serbian student. This
event caused strained relations to exist between Austria and Serbia.
Austria, backed by Germany, was not willing to accept the conciliatory
note of the smaller country, which did everything possible to avoid a
rupture, and declared war July 28, 1914. The action was followed by a
declaration of war by Germany against Russia on a pretext, August 1.
Germany also made an attack on France, attempting to go through Belgium,
against the wishes of that kingdom, to expedite their advancement. The
invasion of Belgium brought Great Britain into the conflict, and
eventually most of the countries of the earth were drawn into the war. Due
to Germany’s ruthless submarine campaign on the high seas, the United
States was forced to declare war against that power, April 6, 1917. Those
nations which were not actually aligned with one or the other hostile
force, were caused to suffer great privation and hardship. The great
conflict continued until November 11, 1918, when an armistice was
declared, which later resulted in a treaty of peace, Germany and her
Allies, Austria-Hungary and Turkey, being required to pay enormous war
indemnity. Millions of lives were sacrificed and billions in property
destroyed during the four years of actual conflict, and at the close the
nations found themselves on the verge of bankruptcy.
During the first year (1917) the United States was in
the war, 3,854 members of the Church were in the army; 616 in the navy;
196 in the marines and over 800 in other branches of the service,
including the Red Cross and medical corps. By the early part of January,
1919, there were 14,975 members of the Church in the service. Between six
and seven hundred lost their lives during the period of the war.
The Fulfilment of Prophecy
The world war was a further fulfilment of the prophecy
on war, given to Joseph Smith, Christmas day, 1832, wherein the revelation
states that “the days will come that war will be poured out upon all
nations.” This revelation on war was partly fulfilled during the rebellion
of the Southern States, which was the beginning of the end, according to
the revelation. There are yet other things pertaining to war and the
vexation of the nations, spoken of in that prophecy, which are to be
fulfilled.
A Period of Prosperity
The administration of President Joseph F. Smith was
noted chiefly for the prosperity and advancement of the Church during the
seventeen years of his presidency. The work spread abroad in the earth as
well as in the stakes of Zion. Meeting houses and tabernacles, with all
the modern conveniences, were erected in many stakes and wards. Even in
the mission fields commodious headquarters and churches were purchased or
built in various places. The Dr. Groves Latter-day Saints Hospital, one of
the best in the country, was erected. Two large and important structures,
the Bishop’s Building and the Church Office Building, were built for the
purpose of taking care of the various offices and departments of Church
work. The Church school system was advanced and enlarged, and the very
best facilities were obtained for the education of the youth of Zion. Two
temples, one at Cardston, Canada, and one at Laie, Hawaii, were under
course of erection, and the work for the salvation of the dead received an
impetus which filled the present temples to overflowing. The Church was
placed in a position to command the respect of all honest men. Prejudice
was overcome, and the great men of our nation commenced to look upon the
Latter-day Saints with more kindly feelings.
The Passing of President Smith
In the spring of 1918, President Smith commenced to fail
in health, and during the late summer and fall he attended to most of his
business matters in his own room, spending very little time at the office.
He would generally take a short automobile ride in the afternoon, from
which he received great benefit. During the October conference (1918) he
was improved and presided at all the sessions. His opening address was
heard in all parts of the tabernacle, but was not delivered with his usual
physical vigor. After the conference he was again confined to his room the
greater part of his time. October 3, 1918, the day before the conference
convened, he received a remarkable manifestation in which much additional
light was revealed regarding the salvation of the dead and the visit of
the Savior to the world of spirits after his crucifixion. He made
reference, indirectly, to this vision in his remarks at the conference,
but it was not published until December, having first been submitted,
October 31, to the counselors in the presidency and the apostles and
patriarch and unanimously accepted by them.
Sunday, November 17, 1918, President Smith was taken
with an attack of pleurisy which continued to grow in intensity, finally
developing into pleuro-pneumonia, and he passed away, Tuesday morning,
November 19. No public funeral could be held as the city was under
quarantine because an epidemic of influenza was over all the land.
Thousands of people lined the streets as the cortege passed and services
in the cold open air were held at the grave, where brief remarks were made
by President Heber J. Grant and Bishop Charles W. Nibley. President Anthon
H. Lund had charge of the services and President Charles W. Penrose
dedicated the grave.
Notes
These nineteen were: Rev. William M. Paden, Parley L. Williams,
Edward B. Critchlow, E. W. Wilson, Charles C. Goodwin, L. W.
Colbath, William A. Nelden, Rev. Clarence T. Brown, Ezra Thompson, J.
J. Corum, George R. Hancock. W. Mont Ferry, Rev. John L. Leilich, Harry C.
Hill, Clarence E. Allen, George M. Scott, S. H. Lewis, H. G.
McMillan and Rev. Abiel Leonard. L. W. Colbath later withdrew his
name.
2. This protest was divided under six heads as
follows:
1. The Mormon Priesthood according to the doctrine of
that Church, is vested with supreme authority in all things temporal and
spiritual.
2. The first presidency and twelve apostles are supreme
in the exercise and transmission of the mandates of this authority.
3. As this body of men has not abandoned the principles
and practices of political dictation, so also it has not abandoned belief
in polygamy and polygamous cohabitation.
4. That this is the attitude of the first presidency and
apostolate, even since the suspensory manifesto of 1890, is evidenced by
their teachings since then.
5. This body of officials, of whom Senator-elect Smoot
is one, also practice or connive at and encourage the practice of polygamy
and polygamous cohabitation, and those whom they have permitted to hold
legislative office have, without protest or objection from them, sought to
pass a law nullifying enactments against polygamous cohabitation.
6. The supreme authorities in the Church, of whom
Senator-elect Reed Smoot is one, to-wit, the first presidency and twelve
apostles, not only connive at violation of, but protect and honor the
violators of the laws against polygamy and polygamous cohabitation.
Chapter 54
President Heber J. Grant
By virtue of his position as president of the council of
apostles, Heber J. Grant became the presiding officer of the Church at the
death of President Smith. Heeding the instruction of President Wilford
Woodruff—which was given by revelation, and was followed by
Presidents Snow and Smith—that the First Presidency should be
organized without delay, the council of apostles met November 23, 1918, in
the temple, and Heber J. Grant was sustained and set apart as President of
the Church. He selected as his counselors Anthon H. Lund and Charles W.
Penrose, who had served with President Joseph F. Smith.
President Grant was born November 22, 1856, in Salt Lake
City. He is the son of Jedediah Morgan and Rachel Ridgeway Ivins Grant. He
is a man of great activity and endless energy; full of sympathy for the
down-trodden and the poor. In the financial world he is recognized as a
man of keen ability, yet his life has been constantly devoted to the
welfare and progress of the Church, his labors in the ministry dating from
his early youth. In 1880 he was called to preside over the Tooele Stake of
Zion, succeeding Francis M. Lyman who had been called into the council of
the twelve. Two years later (October 16, 1882) he was himself ordained an
apostle, having been called, with Elder George Teasdale, to that office by
revelation. In 1901 he went to Japan and there opened the door for the
preaching of the Gospel, and after his return he was called to preside
over the European mission, where he labored for three years.
The General Conference Postponed
Because of the influenza epidemic no meetings were held
during the winter and spring of 1919. On this account, the general
conference, which otherwise would have been held in April, was postponed
until June 1, 1919. On that occasion the solemn assembly of the Priesthood
was held, and the authorities of the Church were sustained by the usual
separate vote of the quorums. That conference was devoted largely to a
memorial service for President Joseph F. Smith.
Dedication of the Hawaiian Temple
Thanksgiving day, November 27, 1919, the temple at Laie,
Hawaii, was dedicated by President Heber J. Grant. He was accompanied to
that land by President Anthon H. Lund, Rudger Clawson, Stephen L.
Richards, Presiding Bishop Charles W. Nibley and Arthur Winter. The
dedicatory services were repeated, five services being held to accommodate
all the people—1,239 souls attending the services. This is the first
temple erected outside of the continental United States, and is for the
benefit of the native Saints of the islands of the Pacific, The mission in
the Hawaiian Islands was opened in 1850 by George Q. Cannon and others,
and thousands of the natives received the Gospel. The site for the
Hawaiian temple was dedicated by President Joseph F. Smith, June 1, 1915.
Passing of President Lund—Changes in the
Presidency
After a brief illness, President Anthon H. Lund, first
counselor in the presidency, passed away at his home in Salt Lake City,
March 2, 1921. He served in the presidency during the entire ministry of
President Joseph F. Smith, having been chosen second counselor in October,
1901. After the death of John R. Winder, the first counselor, he was
advanced to that position in April, 1910. President Lund was a man without
guile, faithful and true to the Gospel and to the brethren, and beloved by
all the Saints.
At the meeting of the council of the presiding
authorities held in the Salt Lake Temple, Thursday, March 10, 1921,
President Charles W. Penrose was chosen by President Heber J. Grant as his
first counselor, and Elder Anthony W. Ivins as his second counselor.
Rudger Clawson was at the same time, set apart as president of the twelve
apostles, as he became the ranking apostle after the death of President
Lund.
Conclusion
At the general conference of the Church held in April,
1920, the one hundredth anniversary of the Prophet’s vision of the Father
and the Son, was fittingly observed. The remarks of the brethren who spoke
had a bearing on the great work accomplished by the Prophet and the
authenticity of his vision. The Improvement Era,
the organ of the priesthood quorums of the Church, and the Young Men’s
Mutual Improvement Association, devoted the April number to special
articles dealing with the theme of the Vision, and other magazines did the
same. A cantata by Evan Stephens, “The Vision,” which was prepared for the
occasion, was rendered before a crowded house in the tabernacle, and
special topics were considered in the several wards, following the
conference.
Ninety years before (1830) the Church was organized with
but six members. In 1920 it numbered several hundred thousands. Its
property in meeting houses, tabernacles, temples and other necessary
buildings, was valued at many millions of dollars. There were 831
stakes of Zion, 871 organized wards and 83 branches within those stakes.
Missionary work had been carried to various parts of the earth, and there
were 24 regularly established missions with numerous conferences and
branches. Each stake of Zion contained a high priests’ quorum, and there
were 209 quorums of seventy. The total number of men holding the
Melchizedek Priesthood was 57,600 and the total number holding the Aaronic
Priesthood was 49,780. Many thousands of young people were enrolled in the
auxiliary organizations of the Church, and it was conceded by many
ministers of other churches, that the “Mormon” Sunday Schools were the
best that could be found in all the world.2
The Church at the close of the first one hundred years
of its history, dating from the Prophet’s vision in 1820, was looked upon
as a power in the earth for good by the great and wise men of the nations.
Knowledge of its work had been brought to the attention of kings,
presidents and rulers of the earth. The prospects before it for
advancement and growth were bright, and it appeared that the prophecy of
Isaiah was about to be fulfilled:
“Go through, go through the gates; prepare ye the way
of the people; . . . lift up a standard for the people.“Behold the Lord hath proclaimed unto the end of the
world, Say ye to the daughter of Zion, Behold, thy salvation cometh;
behold, his reward is with him, and his work before him.“And they shall call them, The holy people, The
redeemed of the LORD; and thou shalt be called, Sought out, A city not
forsaken.” —Isaiah 62:10–12
Notes
Three other stakes have since been organized.
At a synod held in Salt Lake City, in September 1921, at which the
ministers of the Episcopal Church of the Fourth Province of the Pacific
assembled, Rev. W. F. Bulkley said: “We may learn much from the
Mormon Church; it has the best Sunday school organization of any church in
the world.” —Salt Lake Tribune, September 9,
1921, p. 15.
Appendix:
The Auxiliary Organizations of the Church
In addition to the quorums of the priesthood, there are
in the Church a number of helpful organizations known as the auxiliary
organizations. These are: The National Woman’s Relief Society, The Deseret
Sunday School Union, The Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Association, The
Young Ladies’ Mutual Improvement Association, and The Primary Association.
There are two other organizations which are not classed as auxiliaries,
namely, The Religion Classes—an adjunct of the Church School system
—and the Genealogical Society of Utah, which is closely related in
its work to the temples.
A brief statement of the organization, accomplishments
and aims of these societies is here given.
The National Woman’s Relief Society
The Relief Society, now known as the National Woman’s
Relief Society, was organized in Nauvoo, March 17, 1842, by Joseph Smith,
the Prophet, assisted by Elders John Taylor and Willard Richards. The
object of the society, as stated by the Prophet, was “to look after the
wants of the poor, to search after objects of charity, and to administer
to their wants; to assist by correcting the morals and strengthening the
virtues of the community, and thus to save the elders the trouble of
rebuking.” He also expressed the desire that the society might be built up
in a most high and acceptable manner, and should be a select company of
the virtuous, and those who would walk circumspectly. One feature of the
work of the society should be to purge out iniquity, surmount
difficulties, “though the soul be tried, the heart faint, and hands hang
down.” The members should observe the laws of God, hearken to counsel and
keep free from the evils of the world, and be “choice, virtuous and holy.”
This organization, composed exclusively of the women of
the Church, now (1922) numbers about fifty thousand members. It has
accomplished a wonderful work in the care of the poor, alleviating the
distress of the needy, the sick and afflicted, comforting those who mourn
and preparing the dead for burial. All this work, and much more, which
would fill volumes, has been accomplished in the spirit of true charity
and love by the members, who unitedly endeavor to carry out the admonition
and instruction given by President Joseph Smith at the time of the
organization in 1842.
Outlines have been prepared from year to year and a
course of study presented to the members by which they are trained not
only in their duties as members of the society, but also in various
branches of education, to the intent that they may be better equipped for
the duties of life.
The Deseret Sunday School Union
In the fall of 1848, a little more than a year after the
arrival of the pioneers, Richard Ballantyne came to the Salt Lake Valley
with his family. He located in the old fort and the following spring made
plans for a home. He arranged his building to provide for the holding of a
Sunday School, and on Sunday, December 9, 1849, the first Sunday School in
the Rocky Mountains was held at his home, Elder Ballantyne being both
superintendent and teacher. His Sunday School was popular among the
members of the Church and was well attended until the year 1850, when a
chapel was erected in the Fourteenth Ward into which the Sunday school was
transferred. Not long after this other Sunday schools were organized in
Salt Lake City and in a number of other settlements in Utah. However,
there was no uniformity of method or course of study in these schools.
The possibility of the Sunday school as an agency for
teaching the Gospel to the youth was early recognized and the importance
of uniformity and co-operation in this task was urged early in 1866. In
November, 1866, as a result of the growing sentiment, a meeting was called
at which a general organization was effected for the purpose of
concentrating and unifying Sunday school efforts. Elder George Q. Cannon
was elected president of the organization which was called the Deseret
Sunday School Union. The scope of the activity of the Deseret Sunday
School Union is Church-wide, and its purpose is to establish uniformity in
Sunday school methods, to develop greater teaching efficiency, and through
co-operation to improve the quality of the work done. The Juvenile Instructor, first published by Elder George Q.
Cannon early in 1856, is the official organ of the Deseret Sunday School
Union, and is a potent factor in accomplishing these results. It contains
uniform lessons for each department in the Sunday schools.
Teacher-training work, as a means of developing greater teaching
efficiency, was first undertaken by the Sunday schools under the
leadership of the general board. This movement has since attained
Church-wide application under the leadership and direction of the
Priesthood.
As an organization, auxiliary to the Priesthood, the
ultimate aim of the Sunday schools is to teach the principles of the
Gospel and to stimulate the pupils to render willing obedience thereto.
More specifically, the Sunday school aims so to equip its members that
they will be able not only to work out their own salvation through the
application of, and obedience to, the principles of the Gospel which they
have been taught, but also to prepare themselves for service in the
Priesthood, in the mission fields, and in the organizations at home,
through which opportunities are afforded them to render service to others.
The Sunday school recognizes no age limit, but aims to accommodate all
grades of spiritual development from infancy to old age.
From a membership of 50 pupils in the first Sunday
school, the enrollment has increased until in 1920 there were 970 Sunday
schools in the organized stakes of Zion with an enrollment of 170,164
pupils and 18,184 officers and teachers. The Sunday school work and
organization extend into the missions where there are 596 schools which
have an enrollment of 25,189 pupils, and 4,623 officers and teachers. The
Sunday school in the mission field is recognized as the best means of
arousing interest in the work of the Church and as a step toward the
establishing of branches. —Albert Hamer Reiser,
general secretary.
The Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Associations
The Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Associations of the
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints were begun in the year 1875,
the first organization having been effected in the Thirteenth ward, Salt
Lake City, on the 10th day of June, that year, by Junius F. Wells, under
the immediate instruction and direction of President Brigham Young. In
1921 there were 796 associations in the 871 wards and 86 stakes of the
Church, with an active membership of 43,562 and a force of officers of
6,116. In 22 missions of the Church there are a large number of
associations, with an encouraging membership; and much good is being
accomplished for and by the young people. The organization is supervised
by a general board under the direction of the general authorities of the
Church. A central organization consisting of a superintendent, two
assistants, the secretary, treasurer, and several aids, has charge in each
stake. Each ward is officered by a president, two counselors, secretary,
treasurer, class leaders, scoutmaster, and other assistants for special
work in music, recreation, athletics, leisure-time activities, etc.
Standing committees in all the organizations look after the details of the
work. The Y. M. M. I. A. as an auxiliary organization,
while independent in its actions, studies, recreation and general
activity, is under the controlling influence of the general stake and ward
officers of the Church. At the organization, President Brigham Young
stated the keynote of the work of these organizations to be “the
establishment in the youth of individual testimony of the truth and
magnitude of the great latter-day work; the development of the gifts
within them that have been bestowed upon them by the laying on of hands of
the servants of God; cultivating a knowledge and an application of the
eternal principles of the great science of life.” This great body of young
men appeals for place and opportunity to work, to offer a helping hand in
building up the Church of Christ, and to lend effective service to their
fellowmen and in the cause of God. They stand for the mutual improvement
of the youth of Zion. Their souls are thrilled with the grand vision of
the future, and their hearts with the testimony of the glorious destiny of
God’s “marvelous work and a wonder” of the latter days. The aim of their
organization is, first, to impress them and all the youth of Israel with a
testimony of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, as restored through Joseph the
Prophet, and to this end they seek all useful knowledge by which they may
be helpful in its establishment. They desire to learn to preside over
public assemblies, to express themselves before the public, to study and
to practice religious, civil, vocational, social and recreational,
scientific and educational affairs, and to be trained in all that pertains
to religious, moral, physical and intellectual advancement. The further
object of the organization is to answer every desire of the young men of
our community for excellence and enjoyment, and to provide for the
gratification of every legitimate ambition and impulse to excel in these
fields of endeavor without having to seek opportunity elsewhere. In a
word, the aim of the Y. M. M. I. A. is to assist every
young man to “complete living on the foundation of faith in God and his
great latter-day work;” or, in other words, to live in perfect harmony
with the established standards of the restored gospel of Jesus Christ.
The activities of the organization consists in the
adoption of many interesting and attractive details for work and service,
including advanced senior, senior, and junior studies, in new and
attractive manuals; scout work; recreational programs; leisure-time
activities, and other features of marked interest to young people. Their
organization presents to them fascinating programs to hold their attention
in the wonderful business of building characters in their own lives, and
in establishing faith in God and his great latter-day work.
For a general heading for some of the declarations that
this organization has made, and for which the young men stand, it is
fitting to use the words of the Psalmist: “In the name of our God we will
set up our banners.” To this end they present the following slogans: “We
stand for a sacred Sabbath and a weekly half holiday; for a weekly home
evening; for state and nation-wide prohibition; for thrift and economy;
for service to God and country; for spiritual growth through attendance at
sacrament meetings; for the non-use and non-sale of tobacco; and for loyal
citizenship.”
Some trust in the wealth of mines, some in the riches of
the earth, others gather houses and lands, or lean upon the learning and
wisdom of men; but even as David, God’s servant of old, the Y. M.
M. I. A. declare: “We will remember the name of the Lord
our God. He will hear us from his holy heaven, hear and fulfil our
petitions and redeem us with the saving strength of his right hand.”
Setting up these slogans and ideals and, adding thereto, as the years go
by, all helpful and useful knowledge and service, we will not only
remember the name of the Lord our God, but will rejoice in his salvation,
and in his name will seek to conquer evil and establish righteousness.
—Edward H. Anderson, Editor of the
Improvement Era.
The Young Ladies’ Mutual Improvement Association
The Young Ladies’ Mutual Improvement Association had its
origin in the Retrenchment Association, organized by President Brigham
Young in the Lion House on November 28, 1869. Its membership consisted
entirely of his own daughters, Ella Young being president, with Emily,
Zina, Maria, Carlie, Phebe, and Dora Young as associate officers. The
purpose of this Retrenchment Association, as President Young expressed it,
was “to retrench in dress, in speech, in everything that is bad and
worthless, and to improve in everything that is good and beautiful.” He
also stated that he wished his daughters and the girls of the Church
generally to gain for themselves a knowledge and testimony of the Gospel.
Associations of other young women were soon patterned
after the original one and later the name was changed to Mutual
Improvement Association to harmonize with a similar organization which had
been formed among the young men. In 1880 the general board was organized
with Elmina S. Taylor, president; Margaret Y. Taylor, and Martha Home
Tingey as counselors.
The fundamental aim has always been to give religious
and moral instruction and in addition such other lines of work as will
help to prepare girls for their true position in the home and community
life. Courses in the study of the standard works of the Church, and in
literature, home economics, ethics, history, etc., have been provided.
In connection with the Young Men’s Association, a line
of work designated as “special activities” is conducted. This comprises
music, public speaking, story-telling, declamation, drama, debating, etc.
Much of the social work of the Church is under the direction of the two
associations.
The official organ of the Young Ladies’ Mutual
Improvement Association is the Young Woman’s Journal
, a monthly magazine. This reflects the spirit of the organization
and is the medium through which the general board reaches the stake and
ward officers and members of the association. It has a subscription of
about 18,000.
The junior members of the association are known as
bee-hive girls, the work provided being of the nature of the camp fire
work and parallel to that of the boy scouts. There are some 14,000
bee-hive girls, in age from 14 to 16 years. There are also senior classes
in all of the local associations and advanced senior classes in the
majority of them.
The present total membership (April 1, 1921) is 44,681.
Two hundred seventy-six of this number are giving services in the Mission
Field. —Clarissa Beesley, general secretary.
The Primary Association
The need of child culture and special religious training
for the children was the motive that prompted the organization of the
Primary Association in the Church. The Lord has placed the responsibility
of the training of the children of Church members on the shoulders of the
parents, where it properly belongs. However, in the multitude of duties it
is necessary that some help be extended to assist the parents in the
important labor, and the various auxiliary organizations were given for
this purpose.
The following account of the origin and aims of the
Primary Association is furnished by that organization:
“The Primary Association originated at Farmington, Davis
County, Utah, where the first meeting was held on the 25th day of August,
1878.
“For some time previous, Sister Aurelia S. Rogers, the
pioneer in this work, had reflected with much seriousness upon the need of
a more strict guardianship over the boys and girls of Zion. She felt the
necessity for more religious and moral training than they were then
receiving; believed that children should be taught to beautify the home
with the workmanship of their own hands, and learn to cultivate a love for
music, for flowers, and for the beautiful in all things.
“The matter was brought to the attention of Sister Eliza
R. Snow and a consultation was held with President John Taylor, Emmeline
B. Wells, and others, resulting in a decision to organize what is now
known as ‘The Primary Association.’ It was resolved that the instruction
should be of religious and moral character in all that tends toward the
development of upright men and women.
“Accordingly, on the 11th of August, 1878, Aurelia S.
Rogers was set apart to preside over a Primary Association in Farmington.
The ward was systematically visited and the name of every child recorded.
Two weeks later the children were called together, the object of the work
was explained to them, and the career of the association began. In
addition to the meeting where general instructions were given including
lessons on obedience, faith in God, prayer (individual and in concert),
punctuality, and good manners, there were program and testimony meetings.
A quarterly gathering was held every three months to which the parents
were invited and a special program rendered. Lessons were given on the
planting of beans and corn, to be stored for times of famine, in the
making of rag carpets for use in Church buildings; and much emphasis was
laid on the necessity for obedience to the word of wisdom.
“Similar associations were organized in other places,
and on the 19th day of June, 1880, Sister Louie B. Felt, then president of
the Eleventh Ward Association in Salt Lake City, was called to preside
over the Primary Associations of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day
Saints in all the world.”
There are 873 associations in the Church, with a total
enrollment of 70,816 officers and children.
The Religion Classes
Since the first year after the Church was organized it
has maintained schools in which religion has been taught. Even in their
early persecutions and drivings, whenever a sufficient number of members
settled in any locality long enough to justify it, some suitable person
was selected to teach and a school was organized. Religion was always a
prominent study in them, and the study of the Bible was common in most of
the schools of the nation.
When the schools began to be maintained by the state,
however, and people of all religious beliefs were obliged to pay taxes for
their support, the Bible and all religious teachings were banished from
the public schools because of the jealousy of the patrons over religious
tenets. When this movement reached the settlements of our people in the
West they yielded to it, but with deep disappointment, and to make up this
loss the authorities of the Church established a system of Religion
Classes to be held before or after school, and taught by volunteer
teachers who serve without pay.
In these Religion Classes the more practical principles
of the Gospel are taught, and in such a way as to induce to good and noble
actions. The organization and methods of teaching resemble those of the
day school whose work they are designed to supplement. Up to the present
time these classes are held only once a week, except in a few instances,
but the original purpose and ultimate aim is to have them meet daily as
other day school classes. In this way the religious and moral elements,
now so lacking in the work of the public schools and so much needed to
guide and control intellectual efficiency, will be supplied, and a more
balanced development secured.
The Religion Classes are a part of the Church School
system and are under the supervision of the Church Commissioners of
Education. Classes are organized in almost every ward in the Church and
about 50,000 pupils are enrolled. —Horace H.
Cummings, of the General Board.
The Genealogical Society of Utah
The Genealogical Society of Utah was organized at a
meeting held in the office of Franklin D. Richards, Church historian,
November 13, 1894. It was decided by those present to organize a society
the purposes of which were “to be benevolent in collecting, compiling,
establishing and maintaining a genealogical library for the use and
benefit of its members and others; educational in disseminating
information regarding genealogical matters; and also religious.”
The officers consist of a board of seven directors, and
a president, vice-president, secretary, treasurer and librarian, who were
to be selected from among the board of directors. The original members
were Wilford Woodruff, George Q. Cannon, Joseph F. Smith, Lorenzo Snow,
Franklin D. Richards, John Nicholson, Amos Milton Musser, James H.
Anderson, James B. Walkley, Abraham H. Cannon, George Reynolds, John
Jacques and Duncan M. McAllister.
A room in the historian’s office was tendered by
Historian Franklin D. Richards, for the use of the society “until such
time as circumstances required a change of location, the use of said room
to be free of charge.”
Franklin D. Richards was chosen as president of the
society; John Nicholson, vice-president; James H. Anderson, secretary;
Amos Milton Musser, treasurer; John Jacques, librarian. These, with Andrew
Jenson, formed the board of directors.
At the third meeting of the society, November 20, 1894,
articles of incorporation were prepared and the society was duly
incorporated. The first books received by the society were also donated by
the charter members at this meeting, consisting of eleven volumes. This
was the nucleus of a library which, it is hoped by its members, is
destined to become second to none in the world.
At the beginning of the year 1895, the society had
twenty-eight life members and twenty annual members. At the close of the
year 1907 there were one hundred and eight life members and sixty-five
annual members and the library contained sixteen hundred volumes. In the
year 1908 the society took on new life, an impetus was given to the work
of salvation for the dead and the people commenced to give greater
attention to the gathering of the records of their ancestors. The volume
of business during the years 1908–9 was greater than that which had
been accomplished during the previous existence of the society. The work
of the society was extensively advertised and was placed on a firm
footing. At the close of the year 1921, there had been issued 3,100 life
memberships, 6,512 annual memberships, including renewals, and the library
contained 6,500 volumes.
The Genealogical Society of Utah is a Church
institution. It is not confined to the borders of Utah, but is as
extensive in its field of activity as is the Church. It was organized for
the purpose of aiding the members of the Church in the collecting and
compiling of the records of their dead preparatory to the performance of
ordinance work for their salvation in the temples of the Lord.
Appendix:
General Authorities of the Church
Presidents of the Church
Joseph Smith
Born Dec. 23, 1805, at Sharon, Vermont; received the
Melchizedek Priesthood from Peter, James and John in 1820; sustained
April, 1830, as First Elder and Oliver Cowdery as Second Elder of the
Church, at the age of 24; sustained January 25, 1832, as President of the
High Priesthood at a conference at Amherst, Lorain County, Ohio; murdered
June 27, 1844, at Carthage Jail, Illinois.
Brigham Young
Born June 1, 1801, at Whittingham, Vermont; ordained an
apostle Feb. 14, 1835, by Joseph Smith and the three witnesses of the Book
of Mormon; sustained Dec. 27, 1847, as President of the Church, at the age
of 46; died Aug. 29, 1877, at Salt Lake City, Utah.
John Taylor
Born Nov. 1, 1808, at Milnthorpe, England; ordained an
apostle Dec. 19, 1838, under the hands of Brigham Young and Heber C.
Kimball; sustained Oct. 10, 1880, as President of the Church, at the age
of 72; died July 25, 1887, at Kaysville, Davis County, Utah.
Wilford Woodruff
Born March 1, 1807, at Avon, Connecticut; ordained an
apostle April 26, 1839, by Brigham Young; sustained April 7, 1889, as
President of the Church, at the age of 82; died Sept. 2, 1898, at San
Francisco, California.
Lorenzo Snow
Born April 3, 1814, at Mantua, Ohio; ordained an apostle
Feb. 12, 1849, by Heber C. Kimball; sustained Sept. 13, 1898, as President
of the Church, at the age of 84; died Oct. 10, 1901, at Salt Lake City,
Utah.
Joseph F. Smith
Born Nov. 13, 1838, at Far West, Missouri; ordained an
apostle July 1, 1866, by Brigham Young, and set apart as one of the twelve
apostles Oct. 8, 1867; sustained Oct. 17, 1901, as President of the
Church, at the age of 63; died Nov. 19, 1918, at Salt Lake City, Utah.
Heber J. Grant
Born Nov. 22, 1856, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained an
apostle by George Q. Cannon, October 16, 1882; sustained Nov. 23, 1918, as
President of the Church, at the age of 63.
First Counselors in the First Presidency
Sidney Rigdon
Born Feb. 19, 1793, at St. Clair, Pennsylvania; ordained
a high priest by Joseph Smith and set apart March 18, 1833, as first
counselor in the First Presidency by Joseph Smith, at the age of 40;
excommunicated Sept. 8, 1844; died July 14, 1876, at Friendship, Alleghany
County, New York.
Heber C. Kimball
Born June 14, 1801, at Sheldon, Vermont; ordained an
apostle Feb. 14, 1835, under the hands of Oliver Cowdery, David Whitmer
and Martin Harris; sustained Dec. 27, 1847, as first counselor in the
First Presidency, at the age of 46; died June 22, 1868, at Salt Lake City,
Utah.
George A. Smith
Born June 26, 1817, at Potsdam, New York; ordained an
apostle April 26, 1839, by Heber C. Kimball; sustained October 6, 1868, as
first counselor in the First Presidency, at the age of 51; died Sept. 1,
1875, at Salt Lake City, Utah.
John W. Young
Born Oct. 1, 1844, at Nauvoo, Illinois; sustained Oct.
7, 1876, as first counselor in the First Presidency, at the age of 32;
retired at the death of Brigham Young.
George Q. Cannon
Born Jan. 11, 1827, at Liverpool, England; ordained an
apostle Aug. 26, 1860, by Brigham Young; sustained Oct. 10, 1880, as first
counselor in the First Presidency, at the age of 62; sustained April 7,
1889, as first counselor to President Woodruff and also to President
Lorenzo Snow, Sept. 13, 1898; died April 12, 1901, at Monterey, California.
John R. Winder
Born Dec. 11, 1821, at Biddenden, England; ordained a
high priest March 4, 1872, by Edward Hunter; sustained Oct. 17, 1901, as
first counselor in the First Presidency, at the age of 80; died March 27,
1910, at Salt Lake City, Utah.
Anthon H. Lund
Born May 15, 1844, at Aalborg, Denmark; ordained an
apostle Oct. 7, 1889, by George Q. Cannon; sustained April 7, 1910, as
first counselor in the First Presidency, at the age of 66; died March 2,
1921, at Salt Lake City, Utah.
Charles W. Penrose
Born Feb. 4, 1832, at London, England; ordained an
apostle July 7, 1904, by Joseph F. Smith; sustained March 10, 1921, as
first counselor in the First Presidency, at the age of 89.
Second Counselors in the First Presidency
Fred’k G. Williams
Born Oct. 28, 1787, at Suffield, Connecticut; called by
revelation March, 1832, to be a high priest and counselor to Joseph Smith;
ordained and set apart March 18, 1833, as second counselor in the First
Presidency by Joseph Smith, at the age of 46; rejected Nov. 7, 1837; died
Oct. 10, 1842, at Quincy, Illinois.
Hyrum Smith
Born Feb. 9, 1800, at Tunbridge, Vermont; ordained a
high priest June 6, 1831, by Joseph Smith; chosen as second counselor in
the First Presidency, Nov. 7, 1837, at the age of 37; called to be
Patriarch Jan. 24, 1841; murdered June 27, 1844, at Carthage, Illinois.
William Law
Born Sept. 8, 1809; ordained and set apart Jan. 24,
1841, as second counselor in the First Presidency, at the age of 32,
excommunicated April 18, 1844; died Jan. 19, 1892, at Shullsburg,
Wisconsin.
Willard Richards
Born June 24, 1804, at Hopkinton, Massachusetts;
ordained an apostle April 14, 1840, by Brigham Young; sustained Dec. 27,
1847, as second counselor in the First Presidency, at the age of 43; died
March 11, 1854, at Salt Lake City, Utah.
Jedediah M. Grant
Born Feb. 21, 1816, at Windsor, New York; set apart as
second counselor in the First Presidency, April 7, 1854, at the age of 38;
died Dec. 1, 1856, at Salt Lake City, Utah.
Daniel H. Wells
Born Oct. 27, 1814, at Trenton, New York; ordained an
apostle and set apart as second counselor in the First Presidency, January
4, 1857, by Brigham Young, at the age of 43; retired at the death of
President Young; died March 24, 1891, at Salt Lake City, Utah.
Joseph F. Smith
Born Nov. 13, 1838, at Far West, Missouri; set apart as
one of the twelve apostles Oct. 8, 1867; sustained Oct. 10, 1880, as
second counselor to President John Taylor, at the age of 41; also
sustained as second counselor to President Wilford Woodruff, April 7,
1889, and to President Lorenzo Snow, Sept. 13, 1898; sustained as
President of the Church Oct. 17, 1901; died Nov. 19, 1918, at Salt Lake
City, Utah.
Anthon H. Lund
Born May 15, 1844, at Aalborg, Denmark; ordained an
apostle Oct. 7, 1889, by George Q. Cannon; sustained as second counselor
in the First Presidency, Oct. 17, 1901, at the age of 51; advanced to
first counselor April 7, 1910; died March 2, 1921, at Salt Lake City, Utah.
John Henry Smith
Born Sept. 18, 1848, at Carbunca, Iowa; ordained an
apostle Oct. 27, 1880, by Wilford Woodruff; sustained April 7, 1910, as
second counselor in the First Presidency, at the age of 62; died Oct. 13,
1911, at Salt Lake City, Utah.
Charles W. Penrose
Born Feb. 4, 1832, at London, England; ordained an
apostle July 7, 1904, by Joseph F. Smith; sustained Dec. 7, 1911, as
second counselor in the First Presidency, at the age of 79; advanced to
first counselor March 10, 1921.
Anthony W. Ivins
Born Sept. 16, 1852, at Toms River, New Jersey; ordained
an apostle Oct. 6, 1907, by Joseph F. Smith; sustained as second counselor
in the First Presidency, March 10, 1921, at the age of 68.
The Apostles of the Church
Thomas B. Marsh
Born Nov. 1, 1799, at Acton, Massachusetts; ordained an
apostle April 26, 1835, at Kirtland, under the hands of Oliver Cowdery,
David Whitmer and Martin Harris, at the age of 36; President of the
council of apostles; excommunicated for apostasy March 17, 1839; returned
to the Church in 1857; died in 1860 at Ogden, Utah.
David W. Patten
Born in 1800, at Theresa, New York; ordained an apostle
Feb. 15, 1835, at Kirtland, under the hands of Oliver Cowdery, David
Whitmer and Martin Harris, at the age of 35; shot Oct. 25, 1838, at the
Battle of Crooked River, Missouri.
Brigham Young
Born June 1, 1801, at Whittingham, Vermont; ordained an
apostle Feb. 14, 1835, at Kirtland, under the hands of Oliver Cowdery,
David Whitmer and Martin Harris, at the age of 34; President of the
council of apostles; sustained Dec. 27, 1847, as President of the Church;
died Aug. 29, 1877, at Salt Lake City, Utah.
Heber C. Kimball
Born June 14, 1801, at Sheldon, Vermont; ordained an
apostle Feb. 14, 1835, at Kirtland, under the hands of Oliver Cowdery,
David Whitmer and Martin Harris, at the age of 34; died June 22, 1868, at
Salt Lake City, Utah.
Orson Hyde
Born Jan. 8, 1805, at Oxford, Connecticut; ordained an
apostle Feb. 15, 1835, at Kirtland, under the hands of Oliver Cowdery,
David Whitmer and Martin Harris, at the age of 30; died Nov. 28, 1878, at
Spring City, Utah.
William E. McLellin
Born 1806, in Tennessee; ordained an apostle Feb. 15,
1835, at Kirtland, under the hands of Oliver Cowdery, David Whitmer and
Martin Harris, at the age of 29; excommunicated May 11, 1838; died April
24, 1883, at Independence, Jackson County, Missouri.
Parley P. Pratt
Born April 12, 1807, at Burlington, New York; ordained
an apostle Feb. 21, 1835, at Kirtland, under the hands of Oliver Cowdery,
David Whitmer and Martin Harris, at the age of 28; assassinated May 13,
1857, at Van Buren, Arkansas.
Luke S. Johnson
Born Nov. 3, 1807, at Pomfret, Vermont; ordained an
apostle Feb. 15, 1835, at Kirtland, under the hands of Oliver Cowdery,
David Whitmer and Martin Harris, at the age of 28; excommunicated April
13, 1838; returned to the Church, and died Dec. 9, 1861, at Salt Lake
City, Utah.
William B. Smith
Born March 13, 1811, at Royalton, Vermont; ordained an
apostle Feb. 15, 1835, at Kirtland, under the hands of Oliver Cowdery,
David Whitmer and Martin Harris, at the age of 24; excommunicated Oct. 12,
1845; died Nov. 13, 1893, at Osterdock, Clayton County, Iowa.
Orson Pratt
Born Sept. 19, 1811, at Hartford, New York; ordained an
apostle April 26, 1835, under the hands of Oliver Cowdery, David Whitmer
and Martin Harris, at Kirtland, at the age of 24; died Oct. 3, 1881, at
Salt Lake City, Utah.
John F. Boynton
Born Sept. 20, 1811, at Bradford, Massachusetts;
ordained an apostle Feb. 15, 1835, at Kirtland under the hands of Oliver
Cowdery, David Whitmer and Martin Harris, at the age of 24;
excommunicated; died Oct. 20, 1890, at Syracuse, New York.
Lyman E. Johnson
Born Oct. 24, 1811, at Pomfret, Vermont; ordained an
apostle Feb. 14, 1835, at Kirtland, under the hands of Oliver Cowdery,
David Whitmer and Martin Harris, at the age of 24; excommunicated April
13, 1838; died Dec. 20, 1856, at Prairie du Chien, Wisconsin.
John E. Page
Born Feb. 25, 1799, at Trenton, New York; ordained an
apostle Dec. 19. 1838, at Far West, under the hands of Brigham Young and
Heber C. Kimball, at the age of 39; excommunicated June 27, 1846; died in
the fall of 1867, at De Kalb County, Illinois.
John Taylor
Born Nov. 1, 1808, at Milnthorpe, England; ordained an
apostle Dec. 19, 1838, at Far West, under the hands of Brigham Young and
Heber C. Kimball, at the age of 30; President of the council of apostles;
sustained as President of the Church Oct. 10, 1880; died July 25, 1887, at
Kaysville, Utah.
Wilford Woodruff
Born March 1, 1807, at Avon, Connecticut; ordained an
apostle April 26, 1839, at Far West, by Brigham Young, at the age of 32;
President of the council of apostles; sustained as President of the Church
April 7, 1889; died Sept. 2, 1898, at San Francisco, California.
George A. Smith
Born June 26, 1817, at Potsdam, New York; ordained an
apostle April 26, 1839, at Far West, by Heber C. Kimball, at the age of
22; advanced to be first counselor in the First Presidency, Oct. 6, 1868;
died Sept. 1, 1875, at Salt Lake City, Utah.
Willard Richards
Born June 24, 1804, at Hopkinton, Massachusetts;
ordained an apostle April 14, 1840, at Preston, Lancashire, England, by
Brigham Young, at the age of 36; advanced to be second counselor in the
First Presidency, Dec. 27, 1847; died March 11, 1854, at Salt Lake City,
Utah.
Lyman Wight
Born May 9, 1796, at Fairfield, New York; ordained an
apostle April 8, 1841, by Joseph Smith, at Nauvoo, at the age of 44;
excommunicated Feb. 12, 1849; died March 31, 1858, in Mountain Valley,
Texas.
Amasa M. Lyman
Born March 30, 1813, at Lyman, New Hampshire; ordained
an apostle Aug. 20, 1842, at Nauvoo, by Brigham Young, Heber C. Kimball
and George A. Smith, at the age of 29; deprived of apostleship Oct. 8,
1867; excommunicated May 12, 1870; died Feb. 4, 1877, at Fillmore, Millard
County, Utah.
Ezra T. Benson
Born Feb. 22, 1811, at Mendon, Massachusetts; ordained
an apostle July 16, 1846, at Council Bluffs, by Brigham Young, at the age
of 35; died Sept. 3, 1869, at Ogden, Utah.
Charles C. Rich
Born Aug. 21, 1809, at Campbell County, Kentucky;
ordained an apostle Feb. 12, 1849, at Salt Lake City, Utah, by Brigham
Young, at the age of 40; died Nov. 17, 1883, at Paris, Idaho.
Lorenzo Snow
Born April 3, 1814, at Mantua, Ohio; ordained an apostle
Feb. 12, 1849, at Salt Lake City, Utah, by Heber C. Kimball, at the age of
36; President of the council of the apostles; sustained as President of
the Church Sept. 13, 1898; died Oct. 10, 1901, at Salt Lake City, Utah.
Erastus Snow
Born Nov. 9, 1818, at St. Johnsbury. Vermont; ordained
an apostle Feb. 12, 1849, at Salt Lake City, Utah, by Brigham Young, at
the age of 31; died May 27, 1888, at Salt Lake City, Utah.
Franklin D. Richards
Born April 2, 1821, at Richmond, Massachusetts; ordained
an apostle Feb. 12, 1849, at Salt Lake City, Utah, by Heber C. Kimball, at
the age of 28; President of the council of apostles; died Dec. 9, 1899, at
Ogden, Utah.
George Q. Cannon
Born Jan. 11, 1827, at Liverpool, England; ordained an
apostle Aug. 26, 1860, at Salt Lake City, Utah, by Brigham Young, at the
age of 33; advanced to be first counselor in the First Presidency, Oct.
10, 1880; died April 12, 1901, at Monterey, California.
Joseph F. Smith
Born Nov. 13, 1838, at Far West, Missouri; ordained an
apostle July 1, 1866, at Salt Lake City, Utah, by Brigham Young; set apart
as one of the twelve apostles Oct. 8, 1867, at the age of 29; sustained as
President of the Church Oct. 17, 1901; died Nov. 19. 1918, at Salt Lake
City, Utah.
Brigham Young, Jr
Born Dec. 18, 1836, at Kirtland, Ohio; ordained an
apostle Feb. 4, 1864, by Brigham Young and set apart as one of the twelve
apostles Oct. 9, 1868, at the age of 32; President of the council of
apostles; died April 11, 1903, at Salt Lake City, Utah.
Albert Carrington
Born Jan. 8, 1813, at Royalton, Vermont; ordained an
apostle July 3, 1870, by Brigham Young at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age
of 57; excommunicated Nov. 7, 1885; died Sept. 19, 1889, at Salt Lake
City, Utah.
Moses Thatcher
Born Feb. 2, 1842, at Sangamon County, Illinois;
ordained an apostle April 9, 1879, at Salt Lake City, Utah, by John
Taylor, at the age of 37; dropped from the council of the apostles April
6, 1896; died Aug. 21, 1909.
Francis M. Lyman
Born Jan. 12, 1840, at McComb, Illinois; ordained an
apostle Oct. 27, 1880, at Salt Lake City, Utah, by John Taylor, at the age
of 40; President of the council of apostles; died Nov. 18, 1916, at Salt
Lake City, Utah.
John Henry Smith
Born Sept. 18, 1848, at Carbunca, Iowa; ordained an
apostle Oct. 27, 1880, at Salt Lake City, Utah, by Wilford Woodruff, at
the age of 32; advanced to be second counselor in the First Presidency,
April 7, 1910; died Oct. 13, 1911, at Salt Lake City, Utah.
George Teasdale
Born Dec. 8. 1831, at London, England; ordained an
apostle Oct. 16, 1882, at Salt Lake City, Utah, by John Taylor, at the age
of 51; died June 9, 1907, at Salt Lake City, Utah.
Heber J. Grant
Born Nov. 22, 1856, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained an
apostle Oct. 16, 1882, by George Q. Cannon, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at
the age of 26; President of the council of apostles; sustained as
President of the Church Nov. 23, 1918.
John W. Taylor
Born May 15, 1858, at Provo, Utah; ordained an apostle
April 9, 1884, by John Taylor, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 26;
resigned Oct. 6, 1905; excommunicated March 28, 1911; died Oct. 10, 1916,
at Salt Lake City, Utah.
Marriner W. Merrill
Born Sept. 25, 1832, at Sackville, New Brunswick;
ordained an apostle Oct. 7, 1889, at Salt Lake City, Utah, by Wilford
Woodruff, at the age of 57; died Feb. 6, 1906, at Richmond, Cache County,
Utah.
Anthon H. Lund
Born May 15, 1844, at Aalborg, Denmark; ordained an
apostle Oct. 7, 1889 by George Q. Cannon at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the
age of 45; President of the council of apostles; advanced to second
counselor in the First Presidency, Oct. 17, 1901; to first counselor in
Presidency, April 7, 1910; died March 2, 1921.
Abraham H. Cannon
Born March 12, 1859, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained
an apostle Oct. 7, 1889, by Joseph F. Smith, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at
the age of 30; died July 19, 1896, at Salt Lake City, Utah.
Matthias F. Cowley
Born Aug. 25, 1858, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained an
apostle Oct. 7, 1897, by George Q. Cannon at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the
age of 39; resigned Oct. 28, 1905.
Abraham O. Woodruff
Born Nov. 23, 1872, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained an
apostle Oct. 7, 1897, by Wilford Woodruff, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the
age of 25; died June 20, 1904, at El Paso, Texas.
Rudger Clawson
Born March 12, 1857, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained
an apostle Oct. 10, 1898, by Lorenzo Snow, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the
age of 41; President of the council of apostles.
Reed Smoot
Born Jan. 10, 1862, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained an
apostle April 8, 1900, by Lorenzo Snow, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the
age of 38.
Hyrum Mack Smith
Born March 21, 1872, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained
an apostle Oct. 24, 1901, by Joseph F. Smith, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at
the age of 29; died Jan. 23, 1918, at Salt Lake City, Utah.
George Albert Smith
Born April 4, 1870, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained an
apostle Oct. 8, 1903, by Joseph F. Smith, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the
age of 33.
Charles W. Penrose
Born Feb. 4, 1832, at London, England; ordained an
apostle July 7, 1904, by Joseph F. Smith, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the
age of 72; advanced to be second counselor in the First Presidency, Dec.
7, 1911; advanced to be first counselor in the First Presidency, March 10,
1921.
George F. Richards
Born Feb. 23, 1861, at Farmington, Utah; ordained an
apostle April 9, 1906, by Joseph F. Smith, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the
age of 45.
Orson F. Whitney
Born July 1, 1855, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained an
apostle April 9, 1906, by Joseph F. Smith, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the
age of 50.
David O. McKay
Born Sept. 8, 1873, at Huntsville, Utah; ordained an
apostle April 9, 1906, by Joseph F. Smith, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the
age of 32.
Anthony W. Ivins
Born Sept. 16, 1852, at Toms River, New Jersey; ordained
an apostle Oct. 6, 1907, by Joseph F. Smith, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at
the age of 55; advanced to be second counselor in the First Presidency,
March 10, 1921.
Joseph Fielding Smith
Born July 19, 1876, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained an
apostle April 7, 1910, by Joseph F. Smith, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the
age of 33.
James E. Talmage
Born Sept. 21, 1862, at Hungerford, Berkshire, England;
ordained an apostle Dec. 8, 1911, by Joseph F. Smith, at Salt Lake City,
Utah, at the age of 49.
Stephen L. Richards
Born June 18, 1879, at Mendon, Cache County, Utah;
ordained an apostle Jan. 17, 1917, by Joseph F. Smith, at Salt Lake City,
Utah, at the age of 37.
Richard R. Lyman
Born Nov. 23, 1870, at Fillmore, Utah; ordained an
apostle April 7, 1918, by Joseph F. Smith, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the
age of 47.
Melvin J. Ballard
Born Feb. 9, 1873, at Logan, Utah; ordained an apostle
Jan. 7, 1919, by Heber J. Grant, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 45.
John A. Widtsoe
Born Jan. 31, 1872, on the Island of Troyen, Norway;
ordained an apostle March 17, 1921, by Heber J. Grant, at Salt Lake City,
Utah, at the age of 49.
Presiding Patriarchs
Joseph Smith, Sen.
Born July 12, 1771, at Topsfield, Essex County, Mass.;
ordained presiding patriarch of the Church, Dec. 18, 1833, under the hands
of Joseph Smith, Oliver Cowdery, Sidney Rigdon and Frederick G. Williams;
died Sept. 14, 1840, at Nauvoo, Illinois.
Hyrum Smith
Born Feb. 9, 1800, at Tunbridge, Orange County, Vermont;
ordained presiding patriarch of the Church Jan. 24, 1841, by Joseph Smith;
murdered June 27, 1844, at Carthage Jail, Illinois.
John Smith
Born July 16, 1781, at Derryfield, Rockingham County,
New Hampshire; ordained a patriarch Jan. 10, 1844, at Nauvoo, by Joseph
Smith; set apart as presiding patriarch of the Church, Jan. 1, 1849, at
Salt Lake City, Utah; died May 23, 1854, at Salt Lake City, Utah.
John Smith
Born Sept. 22, 1832, at Kirtland, Ohio; ordained
presiding patriarch of the Church Feb. 18, 1855, by Brigham Young at Salt
Lake City, Utah; died Nov. 6, 1911, at Salt Lake City, Utah.
Hyrum G. Smith
Born July 8, 1879, at South Jordan, Salt Lake County,
Utah; ordained a seventy Feb. 11, 1907, by George G. Bywater; ordained a
high priest and presiding patriarch of the Church May 9, 1912, by Joseph
F. Smith at Salt Lake City, Utah.
First Seven Presidents of Seventies
Hazen Aldrich
Chosen and ordained one of the first seven presidents of
seventies Feb. 28, 1835, at Kirtland; released April 6, 1837, previously
having been ordained a high priest.
Joseph Young
Born April 7, 1797, at Hopkinton, Middlesex County,
Mass.; chosen and ordained one of the first seven presidents of seventies
Feb. 28, 1835, at Kirtland, at the age of 37; died July 16, 1881, at Salt
Lake City, Utah.
Levi W. Hancock
Born April 7, 1803, at Old Springfield, Hampden County,
Mass.; chosen and ordained one of the first seven presidents of seventies
Feb. 28, 1835, at Kirtland, at the age of 31; died June 10, 1882, at
Washington, Washington County, Utah.
Zebedee Coltrin
Born Sept. 7, 1804, at Ovid, Seneca County, New York;
chosen and ordained one of the first seven presidents of seventies Feb.
28, 1835, at Kirtland, at the age of 30; released April 6, 1837,
previously having been ordained a high priest; died July 21, 1887, at
Spanish Fork, Utah.
Leonard Rich
Chosen and ordained one of the first seven presidents of
seventies Feb. 28, 1835, at Kirtland; released April 6, 1837, previously
having been ordained a high priest.
Lyman Sherman
Chosen and ordained one of the first seven presidents of
seventies Feb. 28, 1835, at Kirtland; released April 6, 1837, previously
having been ordained a high priest.
Sylvester Smith
Chosen and ordained one of the first seven presidents of
seventies Feb. 28, 1835, at Kirtland; released April 6, 1837, previously
having been ordained a high priest.
John Gould
Ordained a seventy and set apart as one of the first
seven presidents April 6, 1837, at Kirtland; released Sept. 3, 1837,
previously having been ordained a high priest.
James Foster
Born April 1, 1775; ordained a seventy and set apart as
one of the first seven presidents April 6, 1837, at Kirtland; died Dec.
21, 1841, at Morgan County, Utah.
Daniel S. Miles
Ordained a seventy and set apart as one of the first
seven presidents April 6, 1837, at Kirtland; died in 1845, in Hancock
County, Illinois.
Josiah Butterfield
Born in the State of Maine; ordained a seventy and set
apart as one of the first seven presidents April 6, 1837, at Kirtland;
excommunicated Oct. 7, 1844; died at Monterey County, California.
Salmon Gee
Born Oct. 16, 1792, at Lyme, New London County, Conn.;
ordained a seventy and set apart as one of the first seven presidents
April 6, 1837, at Kirtland, at the age of 43; seventies withdrew their
fellowship from Brother Gee, March 6, 1838; died Sept. 13, 1845, at
Ambrosia, Lee County, Iowa.
John Gaylord
Born July 12, 1797; ordained a seventy Dec. 20, 1836;
set apart as one of the first seven presidents April 6, 1837, at Kirtland,
at the age of 39; excommunicated Jan. 13, 1838; rejoined the Church at
Nauvoo.
Henry Harriman
Born June 9, 1804, at Rowley (now Georgetown), Essex
County, Mass.; ordained a seventy in 1835; set apart as one of the first
seven presidents Feb. 6, 1838, at Kirtland, at the age of 33; died May 17,
1891, at Huntington, Emery County, Utah.
Zera Pulsipher
Born June 24, 1789, at Rockingham, Windham County,
Vermont; ordained a seventy and set apart as one of the first seven
presidents March 6, 1838, at Kirtland, at the age of 48; released April
12, 1862; died Jan. 1, 1872, at Hebron, Washington County, Utah.
Albert P. Rockwood
Born June 5, 1805, at Holliston, Middlesex County,
Mass.; ordained a seventy Jan. 5, 1839, at Kirtland; set apart as one of
the first seven presidents Dec. 2, 1845, at Nauvoo, at the age of 40; died
Nov. 26, 1879, at Sugar House, Salt Lake Co., Utah.
Benjamin L. Clapp
Born Aug. 19, 1814, in Alabama; ordained and set apart
president of the 8th quorum of seventy Oct. 20, 1844; set apart as one of
the first seven presidents Dec. 2, 1845, at Nauvoo, at the age of 31; died
in 1860, in California.
Horace S. Eldredge
Born Feb. 6, 1816, at Brutus, Cayuga County, New York;
ordained a seventy and set apart as one of the first seven presidents in
1854, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 38; died Sept. 6, 1888, at
Salt Lake City, Utah.
Jacob Gates
Born March 9, 1811, in St. Johnsbury, Caledonia County,
Vermont; ordained a seventy and set apart as one of the first seven
presidents in Oct. 1862, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 51; died
April 14, 1892, at Provo, Utah.
John Van Cott
Born Sept. 7, 1814, at Canaan, Columbia County, New
York; ordained a seventy, Feb. 25, 1847; set apart as one of the first
seven presidents in Oct. 1862, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 48;
died Feb. 18, 1883, at Salt Lake City, Utah.
William W. Taylor
Born Sept. 11, 1853, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained a
seventy and set apart as one of the first seven presidents April 6, 1880,
at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 26; died Aug. 1, 1884, at Salt Lake
City, Utah.
Abraham H. Cannon
Born March 12, 1859, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained a
seventy and set apart as one of the first seven presidents Oct. 9, 1882,
at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 23; called to the apostleship Oct.
7, 1889; died July 19, 1896, at Salt Lake City, Utah.
Seymour B. Young
Born Oct. 3, 1837, at Kirtland, Ohio; ordained a seventy
Feb. 18, 1857; set apart as one of the first seven presidents Oct. 14,
1882, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 45.
C. D. Fjeldsted
Born Feb. 20, 1829, at Sundbyvester, Copenhagen,
Denmark; ordained a seventy Feb. 5, 1859; set apart as one of the first
seven presidents April 28, 1884, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of
55; died Dec. 23, 1905, at Salt Lake City, Utah.
John Morgan
Born Aug. 8, 1842, at Greensburg, Decatur County,
Indiana; ordained a seventy Oct. 8, 1875; set apart as one of the first
seven presidents Oct. 1884, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 42;
died Aug. 14, 1894, at Preston, Idaho.
Brigham H. Roberts
Born March 13, 1857, at Warrington, Lancashire, England;
ordained a seventy March 8, 1877; set apart as one of the first seven
presidents Oct. 8, 1888, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 31.
George Reynolds
Born Jan. 1, 1842, at Marylebone, London, England;
ordained a seventy March 18, 1866; set apart as one of the first seven
presidents April 10, 1890, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 54; died
Aug. 9, 1909, at Salt Lake City, Utah.
Jonathan Golden Kimball
Born June 9, 1853, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained a
seventy July 21, 1886; set apart as one of the first seven presidents
April 6, 1892, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 38.
Rulon S. Wells
Born July 7, 1854, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained a
seventy Oct. 22, 1875; set apart as one of the first seven presidents
April 5, 1893, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 38.
Edward Stevenson
Born May 1, 1820, at Gibraltar, Spain; ordained a
seventy May 1, 1845; set apart as one of the first seven presidents Oct.
9, 1894, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 74; died Jan. 27, 1897, at
Salt Lake City, Utah.
Joseph W. McMurrin
Born Sept. 5, 1858, at Tooele, Tooele County, Utah;
ordained a seventy April 21, 1884; sustained in Oct. 1897 and set apart as
one of the first seven presidents Jan. 21, 1898, at Liverpool, England, at
the age of 39.
Charles H. Hart
Born July 5, 1866, at Bloomington, Bear Lake County,
Idaho; ordained a seventy Aug. 10, 1890; set apart as one of the first
seven presidents April 8, 1906, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 39.
Levi Edgar Young
Born Feb. 2, 1874, at Salt Lake City, Utah; ordained a
seventy June 18, 1897; sustained as one of the first seven presidents Oct.
6, 1909; set apart Jan. 23, 1910, at New York, at the age of 36.
Presiding Bishops
Edward Partridge
Born Aug. 27, 1793, at Pittsfield, Berkshire County,
Mass.; called by revelation to be the first bishop of the Church, ordained
and set apart Feb. 4, 1831, at the age of 38; died May 27, 1840, at
Nauvoo, Illinois.
Newel K. Whitney
Born Feb. 5, 1795, at Marlborough, Windham County,
Vermont; called by revelation to be the first bishop of Kirtland;
sustained as presiding bishop of the Church at the conference of April,
1847; died Sept. 23, 1850, at Salt Lake City, Utah.
Edward Hunter
Born June 22, 1793, at Newton, Delaware County, Penn.;
called and sustained as the presiding bishop of the Church April 7, 1851;
ordained and set apart April 11, 1852, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age
of 58; died Oct. 16, 1883, at Salt Lake City, Utah.
William B. Preston
Born Nov. 24, 1830, at Halifax, Franklin County,
Virginia; ordained a bishop Nov. 14, 1859; set apart as presiding bishop
of the Church April 6, 1884, at Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 53;
died Aug. 2, 1908, at Salt Lake City, Utah.
Charles W. Nibley
Born Feb. 5, 1849, at Hunterfield, Midlothian, Scotland;
ordained and set apart as presiding bishop of the Church Dec. 11, 1907, at
Salt Lake City, Utah, at the age of 58.
Appendix:
Stakes of Zion
- Name: Organized, President
- *Kirtland: Feb. 17, 1834, Joseph Smith, Jr.
- *Clay-Caldwell: July 3, 1834, David Whitmer
- *Adam-ondi-Ahman: June 28, 1838, John Smith
- *Nauvoo: Oct. 5, 1839, William Marks
- *Zarahemla: Oct. 5, 1839, John Smith
- *Lima: Oct. 21, 1840, Isaac Morley
- *Quincy: Oct. 25, 1840, Daniel Stanton
- *Mount Hope: Oct. 27, 1840, Abel Lamb
- *Freedom: Oct. 27, 1840, Henry W. Miller
- *Geneva: Nov. 1, 1840, William Bosely
- *Springfield: Nov. 5, 1840, Edwin P. Merriam
- Salt Lake: Oct. 3, 1847, John Smith
- Weber: Jan. 26, 1851, Lorin Farr
- Utah: Mar. 19, 1851, Abraham O. Smoot
- Parowan: May, 1852, John C. L. Smith
- *St. Louis: Nov. 4, 1854, Milo Andrus
- *Carson Valley: Oct. 4, 1856, Orson Hyde
- Cache: Nov. 14, 1859, Peter Maughan
- Juab: Sept. 20, 1868, Jacob Bigler
- Millard: Mar. 19, 1869, Thomas Callister
- Beaver: Mar. 12, 1869, John Murdock
- Bear Lake: June 20, 1869, William Budge
- Sevier: May 24, 1874, Joseph A. Young
- St. George: April 7, 1877, J. D. T.
McAllister - Kanab: April 18, 1877, L. John Nuttal
- Panguitch: April 23, 1877, James Henrie
- *Davis: June 17, 1877, William R. Smith
- Tooele: June 24, 1877, Francis M. Lyman
- Morgan: July 1, 1877, Willard G. Smith
- *Sanpete: July 4, 1877, Canute Peterson
- Summit: July 9, 1877, William W. Cluff
- Wasatch: July 15, 1877, Abram Hatch
- Box Elder: Aug. 19, 1877, Oliver G. Snow
- *Little Colorado: Jan. 27, 1878, Lot Smith
- *Eastern Arizona: June 29, 1879, Jesse N. Smith
- Emery: Aug. 13, 1882, Christen D. Larsen
- St. Joseph: Feb. 25, 1883, Christopher Layton
- San Juan: Sept. 23, 1883, Platte D. Lyman
- San Luis: Oct. 10, 1883, Silas S. Smith
- Maricopa: Dec. 10, 1883, Alex F. McDonald
- Bannock: Feb. 4, 1884, Lewis S. Pond
- Oneida: June 1, 1884, William D. Hendricks
- Uintah: May 9, 1887, Samuel R. Bennion
- St. Johns: July 23, 1887, David K. Udall
- Cassia: Nov. 19, 1887, Horton D. Haight
- Snowflake: Dec. 18, 1887, Jesse N. Smith
- Malad: Feb. 12, 1888, Oliver C. Hoskins
- Star Valley: Aug. 14, 1892, George Osmond
- Wayne: May 27, 1893, Willis E. Robison
- Alberta: June 9, 1895, Charles O. Card
- Bingham: June 9, 1895, James E. Steele
- Juarez: Dec. 9, 1895, Anthony W. Ivins
- Woodruff: June 5, 1898, John M. Baxter
- Fremont: Aug. 6, 1898, Thomas E. Ricks
- Pocatello: Aug. 7, 1898, Wm. C. Parkinson
- Jordan: Jan. 21, 1900, Orrin P. Miller
- Granite: Jan. 27, 1900, Frank Y. Taylor
- North Sanpete: Dec. 9, 1900, Christian N. Lund
- South Sanpete: Dec. 9, 1900, Canute Peterson
- Alpine: Jan. 13, 1901, Stephen L. Chipman
- Nebo: Jan. 20, 1901, Jonathan S. Page
- Hyrum: April 30, 1901, William C. Parkinson
- Benson: May 1, 1901, William H. Lewis
- Big Horn: May 26, 1901, Byron Sessions
- Union: June 9, 1901, Franklin S. Bramwell
- Teton: Sept. 2, 1901, Don Carlos Driggs
- Taylor: Aug. 30, 1903, Heber S. Allen
- Blackfoot: Jan. 31, 1904, Elias S. Kimball
- Liberty: Feb. 26, 1904, Hugh J. Cannon
- Pioneer: Mar. 24, 1904, William McLachlin
- Ensign: April 1, 1904, Richard W. Young
- Rigby: Feb. 2, 1908, Don C. Walker
- Ogden: July 26, 1908, Thomas B. Evans
- North Weber: Aug. 2, 1908, James Wotherspoon
- Bear River: Oct. 11, 1908, Milton H. Welling
- Yellowstone: Jan. 10, 1909, Daniel G. Miller
- Carbon: May 8, 1910, Gustave A. Iverson
- Deseret: Aug. 11, 1912, Alonzo A. Hinckley
- Moapa: Sept. 8, 1912, Willard L. Jones
- Duchesne: Dec. 2, 1912, William H. Smart
- Young: May 21, 1913, David Halls
- Boise: Nov. 2, 1913, Heber Q. Hale
- Shelley: Aug. 16, 1914, Joseph H. Dye
- Cottonwood: Nov. 29, 1914, Uriah G. Miller
- Raft River: April 27, 1915, John A. Elison
- Curlew: May 17, 1915, Jonathan C. Cutler
- North Davis: June 20, 1915, Henry H. Blood
- South Davis: June 20, 1915, James H. Robinson
- Portneuf: Aug. 14, 1915, George T. Hyde
- Idaho: Nov. 19, 1916, Nelson J. Hogan
- Montpelier: Dec. 23, 1917, Edward C. Rich
- Tintic: April 22, 1917, E. Franklin Birch
- Twin Falls: July 26, 1919, Lawrence G. Kirkman
- Burley: July 27, 1919, David R. Langlois
- Blaine: Aug. 3, 1919, Wm. Lennox Adams
- Lost River: Aug. 18, 1919, William N. Patten
- Franklin: June 6, 1920, Samuel W. Parkinson
- Logan: June 6, 1920, Oliver H. Budge
- Roosevelt: June 26, 1920, William H. Smart
- Garfield: Aug. 29, 1920, Charles E. Rowan, Jr.
- Lethbridge: Nov. 10, 1921, Hugh B. Brown
Appendix:
Church Publications
issue.)
- Book of Mormon, 1830,
Palmyra, New York.- Danish, 1851, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- German, 1852, Bern, Switzerland.
- French, 1852, Paris, France.
- Italian, 1852, London, England.
- Welsh, 1852, Myrthyr Tydfil, Wales.
- Hawaiian, 1855, San Francisco, California.
- Deseret Alphabet, 1869, New York City, New York.
- Swedish, 1878, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Spanish, 1886, Salt Lake City, Utah.
- Maori, 1889, Auckland, New Zealand.
- Dutch, 1890, Amsterdam, Holland.
- Samoan, 1903, Salt Lake City, Utah.
- Tahitian, 1904, Papeete, Society Islands.
- Turkish, 1906, New York City, New York.
- Japanese, 1909, Tokyo, Japan.
- The Evening and Morning Star
, 1832, Independence, Missouri. - Book of Commandments, 1833,
Independence, Missouri. - L. D. S. Messenger and
Advocate, 1834, Kirtland, Ohio. - Doctrine and Covenants,
1835, Kirtland, Ohio.- Danish, 1851, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Welsh, 1851, Myrthyr Tydfil, Wales.
- German, 1876, Bern, Switzerland.
- Swedish, 1888, Salt Lake City, Utah.
- Dutch, 1908, Rotterdam, Holland.
- Hymn Book, 1835, Kirtland, Ohio.
- The Elder’s Journal, 1838,
Kirtland Ohio. - Times and Seasons, 1839,
Commerce, (Nauvoo) Illinois. - The Millennial Star, 1840,
Manchester and Liverpool, Eng. - The Gospel Reflecter, 1841,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. - The Wasp, 1842, Nauvoo,
Illinois. - The Nauvoo Neighbor, 1843,
Nauvoo, Illinois. - The Prophet, 1844, New York
City, New York. - The New York Messenger,
1845, New York City, New York. - The California Star, 1846,
Yerba Buena, (San Francisco) Cal. - Prophwyd y Jubili, neu, Seren y
Saint (Welsh), 1846, Myrthyr Tydfil, Wales. - Udgorn Seion, neu, Seren y Saint
(Welsh), 1849, Myrthyr Tydfil, Wales. - The Frontier Guardian,
1849, Kanesville (Council Bluffs). - The Deseret News, 1850,
Salt Lake City, Utah. - Pearl of Great Price, 1851,
Liverpool, England.- Welsh, 1852, Wales.
- German, 1882, Bern, Switzerland.
- Danish, 1883, Salt Lake City, Utah.
- Dutch, 1911, Rotterdam, Holland.
- Skandinaviens Stjerne
(Danish), 1851, Copenhagen, Denmark. - Zions Panier (German), 1851
Hamburg, Germany. - L’Étoile du Déséret
(French), 1851, Paris, France. - Zion’s Watchman, 1853,
Sydney, New South Wales. - Le Réflecteur (French),
1853, Geneva, Switzerland. - The Seer, 1853, Washington,
D. C. - Journal of Discourses,
1853, Liverpool, England. - L. D. S. Millennial
Star and Monthly Visitor, 1854, Madras, India. - St. Louis Luminary, 1854,
St. Louis, Missouri. - The Mormon, 1855, New York
City, New York. - The Western Standard, 1856,
San Francisco, California. - Der Darsteller (German),
1856, Geneva, Switzerland. - Die Reform (German), 1862,
Geneva, Switzerland. - Juvenile Instructor, 1866,
Salt Lake City, Utah. - Der Stern (German), 1869,
Zurich, Switzerland. - The Woman’s Exponent, 1872,
Salt Lake City, Utah. - Utah Posten (Danish and
Norwegian), 1873, Salt Lake City, Utah. - Bikuben (Danish and
Norwegian), 1876, Salt Lake City, Utah. - Nordstjernan, 1877,
Göteborg, Sweden. - The Contributor, 1879, Salt
Lake City, Utah. - Ungdommens Raadgiver
(Danish and Norwegian), 1880, Copenhagen, Denmark. - Morgenstjernen (Danish and
Norwegian), 1882, Salt Lake City, Utah. - Church and Farm, 1885, Salt
Lake City, Utah. - Svenska Harolden, 1885,
Salt Lake City, Utah. - Historical Record, 1886,
Salt Lake City, Utah. - Young Woman’s Journal,
1889, Salt Lake City, Utah. - Truth’s Reflex, 1889, St.
John, Kansas. - Der Beobachter (German),
1890, Salt Lake City, Utah. - De Ster (Dutch), 1896,
Rotterdam, Holland. - Improvement Era, 1897, Salt
Lake City, Utah. - Southern Star, 1898,
Chattanooga, Tennessee. - Utah Posten (Swedish),
1900, Salt Lake City, Utah. - Children’s Friend, 1902,
Salt Lake City, Utah. - The Elders’ Journal, 1903,
Atlanta, Georgia. - The Messenger, 1907,
Auckland, New Zealand. - Liahona, 1907,
Independence, Missouri. - Ka Elele Oiaio, 1909,
Honolulu, Hawaii.
Appendix:
List of Authorities and Books of Reference
- Journal History (Manuscript)
, 1830–1921. - Far West Record (Manuscript)
. - Evening and Morning Star,
1832–1834. - Messenger and Advocate, 1834
–1836. - Times and Seasons, 1839
–1846. - Millennial Star, 1840–
1921. - Documentary History of the Church
, vols. 1–6. - Missouri Persecutions,
Parley P. Pratt. - Era of the Protestant Revolution
, Frederick Seebohm. - The Rise of the Dutch Republic
, John Lathrop Motley. - The British Nation, George
M. Wrong. - Topsfield Historical Collections
, vols. 1–8. - The Mack Genealogy, Sophia
Smith Martin. - Five Colonial Families,
vols. 1–2. - History of the Prophet Joseph
, Lucy Mack Smith. - Orson Pratt’s Works, Orson
Pratt. - History of the Church, Juvenile Instructor, vols. 7–19.
- The Contributor, vol. 17.
- Improvement Era, vols. 1
–24. - Deseret News, 1850–
1921. - M. I. A. Manual,
1918–1919. - Life of Joseph Smith,
George Q. Cannon. - Autobiography of Parley P. Pratt
. - Life of Heber C. Kimball,
Orson F. Whitney. - Life of John Taylor,
Brigham H. Roberts. - Wilford Woodruff, His Life
and Labors, M. F. Cowley. - Biography of Lorenzo Snow,
Eliza R. Snow. - History of the Mormon Church
(Americana), B. H. Roberts. - History of Utah, Orson F.
Whitney. - Whitney’s Popular History of Utah
, Orson F. Whitney. - History of Utah, H. H.
Bancroft. - Women of Mormondom, Edward
W. Tullidge. - Historical Record, Andrew
Jenson. - Church Chronology, Andrew
Jenson. - Missouri Persecutions,
Brigham H. Roberts. - Rise and Fall of Nauvoo,
Brigham H. Roberts. - A Brief History of the Church
, Edward H. Anderson. - The Mormon Battalion,
Daniel Tyler. - Conquest of New Mexico and
California, Col. P. St. George Cooke. - The Restoration of the Gospel
, Osborne J. P. Widtsoe. - One Hundred Years of Mormonism
, John Henry Evans.