Transcriber’s Note

The cover above is simulated. Typographical corrections listed at
the end of this version are highlighted in
light green. The
list of publications has been compiled
after the article’s text.

[Pg_251]

double bar

University of Kansas Publications

Museum of Natural History

bar

Volume 15, No. 6, pp. 251-295, 9 figs.

bar
  October 4, 1963  
bar

A Revision of Snakes of the Genus Conophis
(Family Colubridae, from Middle America)
BY
JOHN WELLMAN
University of Kansas
Lawrence
1963

[Pg_252]

University of Kansas Publications, Museum of Natural History

Editors: E. Raymond Hall, Chairman, Henry S. Fitch,
Theodore H. Eaton, Jr.

Volume 15, No. 6, pp. 251-295, 9 figs.

Published October 18, 1963

University of Kansas
Lawrence, Kansas

PRINTED BY
JEAN M. NEIBARGER, STATE PRINTER
TOPEKA, KANSAS
1963
Look for the Union Label
29-5936

[Pg_253]

A Revision of Snakes of the Genus Conophis
(Family Colubridae, from Middle America)
BY
JOHN WELLMAN
CONTENTS
 PAGE
Introduction253
 
Acknowledgments254
 
Materials and Methods254
 
Genus Conophis Peters255
    Key to the Species and Subspecies257
    Analysis of Characters257
    Scutellation258
    Size and Proportions258
    Color Pattern260
    Sexual Dimorphism260
    C. lineatus262
    C. lineatus dunni262
    C. lineatus lineatus267
    C. lineatus concolor270
    C. nevermanni272
    C. pulcher274
    C. vittatus277
    Skull282
    Dentition288
    Vertebrae288
    Hemipenes289
    Food and Feeding289
    Effect of Poison290
 
29
 
292
 
293


INTRODUCTION

Need for a comprehensive systematic review of the snakes of the
genus Conophis was pointed out by Stuart (1954a, b). Since these
snakes appeared to be of zoogeographic importance in the Central
American region, I undertook the review as set forth on the following
pages.[Pg_254]


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

For permission to examine specimens, and for information concerning specimens
in their care, I am grateful to Mr. L. C. Battersby and Miss Alice G. C.
Grandison, British Museum (Natural History); Mr. Charles M. Bogert and
Dr. Richard G. Zweifel, American Museum of Natural History; Dr. Doris M.
Cochran, United States National Museum; Prof. William B. Davis, Agricultural
and Mechanical College of Texas; Dr. Josef Eiselt, Naturhistorisches Museums,
Vienna; Prof. Norman Hartweg and Prof. Laurence C. Stuart, Museum of
Zoology, University of Michigan; Dr. Robert F. Inger, Chicago Natural History
Museum; Dr. Alan E. Leviton, California Academy of Sciences; Mr.
Edmond V. Malnate, Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia; Prof. George
S. Myers, Stanford University Natural History Museum; Mr. Wilfred T. Neill,
Ross Allen’s Reptile Institute; Mr. Neil D. Richmond, Carnegie Museum; Dr.
William J. Riemer, University of Florida Collections; Prof. Robert C. Stebbins,
Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California; Prof. Hobart M.
Smith, University of Illinois Natural History Museum; and Dr. Ernest E.
Williams, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard.

Prof. William E. Duellman supplied invaluable information and guidance
in my study. I am grateful to Prof. E. Raymond Hall for use of facilities of
the Museum of Natural History and editorial assistance. I thank Prof.
Laurence C. Stuart and Prof. Edward H. Taylor for information and suggestions.
My own field experience in Middle America came as a result of assisting
Professor Duellman in his own researches supported by a grant from the
National Science Foundation (NSF-G 9827). For these things I am deeply
grateful. Specimens that I have seen alive were collected by field companions
Dale L. Hoyt and Jerome B. Tulecke. Finally, I am grateful to my wife,
Margaret L. Wellman, for much help including typing much of the manuscript.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of the 325 specimens of the genus Conophis available to me, representing
most of those in museum collections, scale counts were made in the usual
manner on 309. Ventrals were counted following the system proposed by
Dowling (1951:97-99); the anal plate was not included. The anteroposterior
position of the place where reduction occurs in the number of the dorsal rows
of scales is designated by citing the number of the ventral scale directly
beneath that place.

Measurements were taken to the nearest millimeter by means of a millimeter
stick. Body length is the distance from the tip of the snout to the
posterior edge of the anal plate; tail length, from the latter point to the tip
of the tail; and total length, the sum of the body plus tail.

Descriptions of color are based on preserved specimens. Where descriptions
of the color of living individuals are given, the data were taken from
Kodachrome slides made available to me by William E. Duellman. Due to
the transient nature of the longitudinal dark stripes in these snakes, no standard
terminology has been devised, except that the posterior continuations of the
stripes which on the head pass through the eye are termed lateral stripes;
the posterior continuations of the median stripe of the head are termed dorsolateral
[Pg_255]
stripes. A paravertebral stripe is one that is present on the scale-row
on either side of, but not including, the mid-dorsal (vertebral) scale-row.

In order to reduce confusion in the discussion of variation, the numbers
designating the rows of dorsal scales are written as 1st, 2nd, whereas the
numbers designating the stripes are written as first, second.

Except in three dried skeletons, teeth were counted on dentigerous bones
in situ. Since teeth are often missing, the sockets were counted in order to
obtain an accurate count.

In accounts of the species and subspecies, the observed range of variation
is followed by the mean in parentheses; in some instances the mean is followed
by the standard deviation, also in parentheses. An example is 65-79
(70.6 ± 3.93).

Each synonymy includes all generic and specific combinations known to me
that have been used for the genus, and, in addition, references to catalogues,
checklists, and reports of collections.

Localities of occurrence that are not plotted on the distribution maps are
recorded in italic type under Specimens Examined. In the list of Specimens
Examined the localities and specimens are listed in the following order:
countries in alphabetical order; states or departments in alphabetical order in
each country; localities in alphabetical order in each state or department;
museum numbers in numerical order after the abbreviations of names of
museums. When more than one specimen bears a single catalogue number,
the number of specimens is given in parentheses following the museum catalogue
number. Specimens for which data are given only as to country or to
state or department are listed first after the name of that political unit under
“no specific locality.”

The abbreviations for the museum collections are:

AMNHAmerican Museum of Natural History
ANSPAcademy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia
BMNHBritish Museum (Natural History)
CASCalifornia Academy of Sciences
CNHMChicago Natural History Museum
ERA-WTNE. Ross Allen-Wilfred T. Neill, Ross Allen’s Reptile Institute
KUUniversity of Kansas Museum of Natural History
MCZMuseum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard
MVZMuseum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California
NMWNaturhistorisches Museums Wien, Vienna
SUStanford University Natural History Museum
TCWCTexas Cooperative Wildlife Collection, Agricultural and
Mechanical College of Texas
UFUniversity of Florida Collections
UIMNHUniversity of Illinois Museum of Natural History
UMMZUniversity of Michigan Museum of Zoology
USNMUnited States National Museum
Family Colubridae
Subfamily Xenodontinae

Genus Conophis Peters
Tomodon (part) Duméril, Bibron and Duméril,
Erpétologie Générale,
7(pt.2):936, February 25, 1854 (lineatus and vittatus); Salvin, Proc.
Zool. Soc. London, 28:455, 1860 (pulcher).

[Pg_256]

Psammophis (part), Günther, Catalogue of Colubrine Snakes in the Collection
of the British Museum, London, 1858:135 (lineatus).
Conophis Peters, Monatsb. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, 1860:519-520, pl., fig. 3
(vittatus); Cope, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 13:300, December
28, 1861 (lineatus concolor); Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia,
18:318-319, February 20, 1867 (lineatus concolor); Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci.
Philadelphia, ser. 2, 8:137, 1876 (pulcher); Bocourt in Duméril, Bocourt
and Mocquard, Mission Scientifique au Mexique et dans l’Amerique
Centrale, 2:643-644, pl. 38, fig. 5, 1886 (lineatus lineatus); Cope, Proc.
Amer. Philos. Soc., 23:489, October 28, 1886; Hoffmann, Klassen und
Ordnungen des Thier-Reichs. Reptilien. Bd. 6, 3:1707, 1890; Cope, Trans.
Amer. Philos. Soc., 18:207, April 15, 1895; Dunn, Bull. Antivenin Inst.
Amer., 2(1):21, 24, April, 1928; Copeia, no. 4:214, December 31, 1937
(nevermanni).
Tachymenis (in part), Garman, Bull. Essex Inst., 16:33, January 9, 1884
(vittatus and lineatus).
Erythrolamprus (in part), Ditmars, Bull. Antivenin Inst. Amer., 2(2):27-29,
June.
Coniophanes (in part), Wettstein, Sitz. Akad. Wiss. Wien, mathem-naturw.
kl. 143:37-38, 1934 (nevermanni).

Historical summary.—In 1854 Duméril, Bibron and Duméril described and
figured Tomodon lineatum from America. In 1860 Peters described and
figured as a new genus and species, Conophis vittatus, based on a specimen
that he had obtained from a dealer in Hamburg. The provenance of this
specimen is not known, for it was discovered aboard a ship near the mouth of
the Mississippi River. It was not until 1871 that Cope included lineatus in
the genus Conophis. Cope (1861) proposed the name Conophis vittatus (nec
Peters, 1860). Later (1900) he changed its name to Conophis lineaticeps.
Early uncertainty of the relationships of the species lineatus caused Günther
(1858) to place it in the genus Psammophis. With the exception of Garman
(1884a and 1884b) who placed lineatus in the genus Tachymenis, and Wettstein
(1934) who reported five specimens of Conophis nevermanni as Coniophanes
i. imperialis
, all specimens reported after 1876 were placed in the genus
Conophis.

The only previous attempt to review the systematics of this genus was
made by Smith (1941) who based his study primarily on specimens in the
United States National Museum. He examined only 28 specimens, including
none of one species (nevermanni).

Description.—Hemipenis slightly bifurcate having forked sulcus spermaticus,
large spines near base, and smaller spines or papillae on flounces nearer
apices; prediastemal maxillary teeth 8-12, subequal in length, and followed
by short diastema and one enlarged fang or two; fangs grooved, only one
functional at any one time, unless snake is in process of shedding teeth; teeth
6-10 on palatine, 15 to 19 on pterygoid, 15 to 21 on dentary; teeth on dentary
decreasing in size posteriorly; large parotid (venom) gland on either side of
head in temporal region; head shields of basically unmodified colubrid type
excepting decurved rostral; rostral concave below and therein modified for
burrowing; internasals and prefrontals paired; nasals divided; loreal single;
preocular one, rarely two; postoculars, two; supralabials, 7-8, 3rd and 4th
or 4th and 5th under eye; infralabials, 8-11, usually 9 or 10; temporals, normally
1 plus 2 plus 3; chin-shields subequal in length; ventrals, 149-183, rounded
and overlapping; caudals, 55-89, paired and imbricate; anal divided; dorsal
[Pg_257]
scales smooth and in 19 rows at mid-body with no apical pits or keels; scale
reduction normally involving fusion of 3rd and 4th rows, resulting in 17
scale-rows near tail; tail length more than 20 per cent of body length;
maximum total length exceeding 1.1 meters; dorsal color pattern consisting of
dark stripes, or no darkening, on paler ground-color; ventral surfaces immaculate
pale yellowish or white, except on specimens having single lateral
dark spots on some or all ventrals; pupil round; diurnal or crepuscular; feeding
primarily on small lizards, sometimes on small mammals or other snakes.

Distribution.—Semi-arid regions of southern México and Central America
as far south as Costa Rica.


Key to the Species and Subspecies

Although many juveniles differ greatly in general coloration from the
adults, both the juveniles and the adults of any species or subspecies can be
identified from the following key; juveniles differ from adults in extent and
intensity of dark pigmentation but not in rows of scales involved.

1.  Seven supralabials (3rd and 4th below orbit); 3 to 8 dark
stripes along body
2
   Eight supralabials (4th and 5th below orbit); unstriped or
with more than 4 dark stripes along body, or dark with 2 or
4 pale stripes
3
2.  Dark stripes involving no more than one
longitudinal scale-row
C. lineatus lineatus (part), p. 267
   Dark stripes involving at least
two adjacent scale-rows
C. vittatus, p. 277
3.  Supralabials having black borders above;
head and body generally black with 2 or 4 white lines running length
of body
C. nevermanni, p. 272
   Supralabials immaculate or having
dark borders below; head and body usually pale with dark stripes, or
without stripes
4
4.  Lateral dark stripe through eye involving
upper half of second scale-row; dark stripe on paravertebral row, at
least posteriorly
C. pulcher, p. 274
   Lateral dark stripe becoming
indistinct on body, or restricted to 4th or 3rd and 4th rows
anteriorly, not involving 2nd scale-row on anterior 1/3 of body
(an auxiliary lateral stripe sometimes present involving 2nd row);
no paravertebral stripes
5
5.  Stripes disappearing posteriorly
(except for small spots of pigment on scale-row 4 or 7);
1st scale-row unpigmented
C. lineatus concolor, p. 270
   Stripes present posteriorly;
1st scale-row pigmented
6
6.  Lateral stripes narrow on nape, restricted
to 4th scale-row on body
C. lineatus lineatus (part), p. 267
   Lateral stripes involving 3rd and 4th rows, at least on nape
C. lineatus dunni, p. 262


Analysis of Characters

Characters showing inter-specific and intra-specific variation and that have
a wide range of variation were analyzed statistically, when possible, in order
to determine extent of variation. One character (see table 3) was analyzed
for sexual dimorphism, and for it the coefficient of difference is also given.
The statistical terms and formulae have been adopted from Mayr, Linsley and
Usinger (1953). Dorsal head shields varied individually and were of no
taxonomic importance. Osteological and hemipeneal characters did not show
enough variation to be considered here.

[Pg_258]


Scutellation

Labials, dorsals, ventrals, and subcaudals were the most useful scales.

Labials.—All species usually have eight supralabials except C. vittatus,
which has seven. The only other population having a relatively high frequency
of occurrence of seven supralabials is C. l. lineatus. In specimens having eight
supralabials, the fourth and fifth enter the orbit; in specimens having seven
supralabials, the third and fourth enter the orbit (the second and third are
fused). Usually there are ten infralabials, sometimes nine or eleven; specimens
having seven supralabials usually have nine infralabials, sometimes
eight, rarely ten.

Dorsals.—Although there is no variation in the number of rows of dorsal
scales, there is some in the method of scale reduction. There are 19 rows of
dorsal scales from close behind the head to about midway on the body where
two rows are lost, leaving 17 rows from there to near the base of the tail.
This reduction is accomplished by fusion of the scales of the 3rd and 4th
rows or sometimes by the dropping out of the 3rd row. The place at which
reduction occurs in number of dorsal scales in relation to the ventral (scale)
directly below is highly variable and of little taxonomic importance (table 1).

Table 1.—Variation in the Place of Dorsal Scale Reduction in
Conophis.
TaxonNumber of SpecimensRangeMeanStandard DeviationStandard ErrorCoefficient of Variation
l. concolor4589-114102.55.570.835.43
l. dunni3691-111102.14.590.774.50
l. lineatus2691-107100.23.590.723.58
nevermanni684- 9793.24.711.925.05
pulcher2694-119104.64.900.964.68
vittatus17084-118102.36.600.166.45

Ventrals.—The number of ventral scutes varies from 149-183, and shows
no significant variation in the means (table 2).

Subcaudals.—The number of subcaudal scutes varies from 55 to 89. In
some populations there is no overlap in the range of variation of males and
females. The total variation and sexual dimorphism are analyzed in table 3.


Size and Proportions

Although considerable variation in size is observable, little taxonomic
use is made of size since sufficient series are not available to determine age
classes. The subspecies attaining the largest size is C. lineatus concolor; all
others are smaller and of about the same size and proportions. The longest
specimen, a male of C. l. concolor, has a body length of 893 mm., a tail length
of 274 mm., and a total length of 1167 mm.

[Pg_259]

Table 2.—Variation in the Number of Ventrals in Conophis.
TaxonNumber of SpecimensRangeMeanStandard DeviationStandard ErrorCoefficient of Variation
l. concolor 45158-170163.71.560.230.95
l. dunni36159-178167.24.560.762.72
l. lineatus26157-169163.53.590.722.20
nevermanni6173-183176.54.001.632.27
pulcher 26149-180169.55.311.043.13
vittatus171149-180163.76.330.153.87

Table 3.—Sexual Dimorphism as Indicated by Variation in the Number
of Subcaudals in Conophis
TaxonSexNumber of SpecimensRangeMeanStandard DeviationStandard ErrorCoefficient of VariationCoefficient of Difference
lineatus concolor2268-7470.32.140.463.04 
        1.97
 1656-6561.82.180.553.53 
         
lineatus dunni1467-8074.53.861.035.18 
        0.95
 1660-7267.13.910.975.82 
         
lineatus lineatus1167-7369.86.171.858.84 
        0.60
 960-6662.46.172.069.89 
         
nevermanni382-8985.3……………… 
        ……
 271-7673.5……………… 
         
pulcher770-7974.33.111.174.19 
        0.93
 1165-7168.23.421.085.01 
         
vittatus9559-7667.83.330.344.91 
        1.28
 5855-6660.02.750.364.58 

[Pg_260]


Color Pattern

This is the primary feature used to separate species and subspecies in this
genus. The color pattern consists of three black or deep brown stripes on the
dorsal part of the head, one mid-dorsally, and one on each side of the head
passing through the eye. On the body, there are usually dark longitudinal
stripes on a pale tan or white background. There may be as few as three
in vittatus, and as many as 13 in l. dunni; except that there is none in C. l.
concolor
. There are two pairs of primary dark stripes. The first is the body
stripe that is the posterior extension of the stripe which on the head passes
through the eye and is termed the lateral stripe. The other primary stripe is
the posterior continuation of the mid-dorsal head stripe. Usually it is split
into two dorsolateral stripes on the body. Stripes may be present on the
scale-row to either side of the primary stripe. These stripes are usually dark
brown or black and are the secondary stripes. Finally, additional stripes may
be present that are paler brown and bear no direct relationship to the primary
stripes. These are auxiliary stripes.

Every stripe originates either as broad continuous stripe or as a row of
spots or dashes, forming a discontinuous stripe, which in some specimens
becomes continuous posteriorly. The stripes are usually black or deep brown,
although auxiliary stripes are sometimes paler. The dorsal ground color is
pale brown, tan, olive, or white; usually the ground color is palest ventrally
and darkest dorsally.

In some specimens of Conophis the lateral tips of the ventrals are spotted,
one spot on each end of each ventral. Otherwise, the ventrals are immaculate
white.

In some species there is considerable ontogenetic change in color pattern,
although the juveniles bear the basic color characteristics of the adults. For
example, juveniles of the sympatric species C. lineatus dunni and C. pulcher
can be separated on the basis of which scale-rows are darkly pigmented.
C. l. dunni has eight stripes in juveniles and as many as 13 in adults.
Juveniles show a greater contrast between the black stripes and the pale
ground color than do adults. With increased age (size) the stripes in some
populations become paler and are split; simultaneously the ground color
becomes darker.


Sexual Dimorphism

Sexual dimorphism is evident in all species and subspecies of
Conophis. Differences always exist in the number of subcaudals
and in the tail/body ratio; males have more subcaudals and relatively
longer tails than do females (table 3). Otherwise, there is
little sexual dimorphism in these snakes. Males and females cannot
be differentiated by any feature of coloration.

Formulation of a biological concept of the species as defined
by Mayr (1942) is difficult when most of the data primarily relied
upon are from preserved specimens. Nevertheless, a total view
of variation was attempted so that differences within and between
populations could be recognized. Differences, between populations,
[Pg_261]
that seem to be part of a continuous or internal cline (Huxley,
1942) are not used for characterizing subspecies.

[Pg_262]

Fig. 1. Patterns of dorsal coloration at mid-body of adults of all species and
subspecies of the genus Conophis except C. lineatus concolor. A. C. lineatus
dunni (UMMZ 107339) from Santa Rosa, Guatemala. B. C. lineatus dunni
(UMMZ 116537) from 1.5 mi. N Matagalpa, Nicaragua. C. C. lineatus dunni
(ANSP 3480) from “San Jose,” Costa Rica. D. C. l. lineatus (KU 23253)
from Río Blanco, 20 km. WNW Piedras Negras, Veracruz, México. E. C.
nevermanni (ANSP 22424) “San Jose,” Costa Rica. F. C. pulcher (UIMNH
33646) from Soconusco, Chiapas, México. G. C. vittatus (KU 39626) from
Atencingo, Puebla, México. H. C. vittatus (TCWC 9473) from 1 mi. S
Colotlipa, Guerrero, México. I. C. vittatus (UMMZ 82653) from “vicinity
of” Salina Cruz, Oaxaca, México. Approximately × 3/4.


Conophis lineatus (Duméril, Bibron and Duméril)

Tomodon lineatum (in part) Duméril, Bibron and Duméril,
Erpétologie Générale,
7(pt. 2):936-938, February 25, 1854.

Diagnosis.—No dark pigmentation posterior to nape; lateral dark stripe
anteriorly passing through eye and posteriorly involving 4th or 3rd and 4th
scale-rows only; first scale-row darkly pigmented; no paravertebral dark stripe;
six to thirteen (or no) dark stripes at mid-body; usually eight (sometimes
seven) supralabials immaculate white or having dark ventral margins.

Variation.—The variation in this species is discussed more completely in
the descriptions of the subspecies. One hundred and seven specimens have
157 to 178 (164.8) ventrals. Eighty-eight of these snakes having complete
tails have 56 to 80 (68.0) subcaudals; the number of ventrals plus subcaudals
varies from 222 to 247 (233.5) in 87 of these. On 107 specimens the reduction
from 19 to 17 dorsal scale-rows takes place between ventrals 89 and 114
(101.8). Sexual dimorphism is evident in the number of subcaudals; there
are, on the average, fewer subcaudals in females than in males of each subspecies.
The largest specimen is a male C. l. concolor (USNM 46345) from
Chichén Itzá, Yucatán, México, having a body length of 893 mm., a tail
length of 274 mm. and a total length of 1167 mm. The smallest is a juvenile
C. l. dunni (MCZ 49749) from Tegucigalpa, Honduras, having a body length
of 162 mm., a tail length of 51 mm. and a total length of 213 mm.

The greatest variation is in coloration. Dark color, or lack thereof, has
been used to separate the subspecies of C. lineatus. The ground-color is pale
brown, pale olive or white, either with no stripes on the body or with eight
to thirteen dark stripes at mid-body. Specimens having dark stripes on the
body always have black or dark brown pigmentation on the first, 4th and
7th dorsal scale-rows. In some there is dark pigmentation on the 2nd, 3rd,
8th and 10th rows of scales. The stripes appear on the nape or farther posteriorly,
usually on the anterior third of the body, either as a series of spots
or dashes that form a continuous stripe farther posteriorly or as a continuous
stripe.

The ventrals usually have more or less conspicuous dark spots laterally
on those specimens having dark stripes present on the dorsum; spots are
absent on all specimens having no dorsal stripes and on some specimens
having dorsal stripes. Except for the dark lateral spots (when present) the
ventrals are immaculate white. Usually the dorsal ground-color is pale tan,
especially on the striped forms. The ground-color is usually palest on the
lower dorsal scale rows and darkest dorsally.

Three populations are separable as subspecies; one has no stripes on the
body and occurs in the Yucatán Peninsula. The other two have stripes on the
dorsum and vary clinally in coloration from the north (Veracruz, México) to
south (Costa Rica) (Fig. 2). Reasons for separating these widespread, variable
snakes into two subspecies are that they are discontinuous in distribution
(the population in Veracruz is disjunct from the one that extends from Guatemala
to Costa Rica), and that these populations have distinctly different color
patterns.


Conophis lineatus dunni Smith
Psammophis lineatus, Günther, Catalogue of Colubrine Snakes in the Collection
of the British Museum, p. 135, 1858.

[Pg_263]

Fig. 2. Selected locality records for the subspecies of Conophis lineatus.

Conophis lineatus, Cope, 3rd Ann. Rept. Peabody Acad. Sci., p. 82, 1871;
Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 23:204, October 24, 1871; Journ.
Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, ser. 2, 8:137, 1876; Bull. U. S. Natl. Mus.,
32:77, 1887; Günther, Biologia Centrali-Americana, p. 165, March, 1895;
Boulenger, Catalogue of the Snakes in the British Museum (Natural
History), 3:122-123, 1896; Werner, Arch. Naturges., 90, abt. A, 12:143,
1925; Schmidt, Zool. Ser. Field Mus. Nat. Hist., 12:199-200, November
21, 1928; Amaral, Mem. Inst. Butantan, 4:212, 1929; Werner, Zool.
Jahrb., 57:184, 1929; Stuart, Occas. Papers Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan,
292:5, June 29, 1934; Dunn, Copeia, no. 4:214, December 31, 1937.

Conophis lineatus similis Smith, Journ. Washington Acad. Sci., 31:123-124,
March 15, 1941 (Type.—United States National Museum, No. 79963;
type locality.—Managua, Nicaragua; nec Bocourt in Duméril, Bibron
and Mocquard, Mission Scientifique au Mexique et dans l’Amerique
Centrale, 2:647-648, 1886); Cochran, Bull. U. S. Natl. Mus., 220:167,
1961.

Conophis lineatus dunni Smith, Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus. 92:394-395, November
5, 1942; Savage, Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 50:483-486, December
31, 1949; Taylor, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 34(pt. 1):145, October 1,
1951; Neill and Allen, Publ. Res. Div. Ross Allen’s Rept. Inst., 2:56,
November 10, 1959; Herpetologica, 16:146-148, fig. 2, September 23,
1960.

Conophis pulcher pulcher, Stuart, Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan,
69:79, June 12, 1948; Contr. Lab. Vert. Biol. Univ. Michigan, 45:24,
[Pg_264]
May, 1950; Contr. Lab. Vert. Biol. Univ. Michigan, 49:14, August, 1951;
Contr. Lab. Vert. Biol. Univ. Michigan, 65:19-20 (part), March, 1954.

Conophis pulcher plagosus, Mertens, Zool. Anz., 148:93, February, 1952;
Abhand. Senken. Naturw. Gesell., 487:61-62, December 1, 1952.

Conophis lineatus nevermanni, Taylor, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 37(pt. 1):563-565,
fig. 16, October 15, 1955.

Type.—United States National Museum, no. 79963, obtained by Lt. H. C.
Kellers. Type locality: Managua, Nicaragua. There are also three paratypes;
one a topotype (USNM 79964), one from “Nicaragua” (USNM 25237),
and one from Esparta, Costa Rica (USNM 37758).

Diagnosis.—Lateral dark stripe anteriorly passing through eye and posteriorly
involving 3rd and 4th scale-rows; 1st scale-row darkly pigmented; no
paravertebral dark stripe, although vertebral row sometimes darkly pigmented;
six to thirteen stripes at mid-body; eight supralabials
immaculate or having
dark ventral margins.

Variation.—Thirty-six specimens have 159 to 178 (167.2 ± 4.56) ventrals.
Thirty of these snakes having complete tails have 60 to 80 (70.5 ± 5.36)
subcaudals; the number of ventrals plus subcaudals varies from 224 to 247
(237.6). In 36 specimens the reduction from 19 to 17 dorsal scales takes
place between ventrals 91 and 111 (102.1 ± 4.59). Sexual dimorphism is
evident in the number of subcaudals; 16 females have 60 to 72 (67.1), and
14 males have 67 to 80 (74.5) subcaudals. The largest specimen (ERA-WTN
BH-300) is a female from Augustine, British Honduras, having a body length
of 732 mm., a tail length of 183 mm. and a total length of 915 mm. A
juvenile (MCZ 49794) from Tegucigalpa, Honduras, has a body length of
162 mm., a tail length of 51 mm. and a total length of 213 mm.

The greatest variation is in coloration. The ground-color is pale brown or
white with dark stripes of black or deep brown present dorsally and laterally.
Some specimens from Costa Rica have as many as 13 dark stripes at mid-body
(fig. 1, C). In these snakes the first row of dorsal scales bears a series
of large, slightly elongated, dark spots; on the 2nd row a narrow dark brown
stripe on the middle of the scales; on the 3rd a black stripe on the dorsal one-third
to one-half of the scales; on the 4th and the 7th rows black stripes on
the medial half of the scales of each row; on the 8th and 10th (vertebral)
rows dark brown stripes on the medial third of the scales of each row. A
specimen from Guatemala (UMMZ 107339) shows the greatest reduction of
stripes and dark pigmentation (fig. 1, A); it has only eight stripes at mid-body:
on the first row of dorsal scales a discontinuous stripe is formed by a
series of dashes; the 3rd row bears a series of small black spots near the
base and tip of each scale; the 4th and 7th rows bear continuous black
stripes on the medial third to fourth of the scales of each row; the 8th row
has extremely small dark spots near the tips of some scales.

The primary stripes, characteristic
of the species lineatus, are those on the 1st,
4th and 7th rows of dorsal scales; these are the most prominent stripes. In
some specimens these primary stripes begin as spots or dashes on the nape
and become continuous stripes posteriorly; in others they are continuous for
the length of the body. The stripe on the 1st row is most variable; usually it
consists of only a discontinuous series of dashes for most of its length. The
secondary stripes are those on the 3rd and 8th rows; of these, only the one
on the 3rd scale-row is present on the nape. The stripe on the 3rd row in
[Pg_265]
combination with the dark stripe on the 4th row is the posterior continuation
of the dark stripe that on the head passes through the eye; this stripe is
characteristic of C. lineatus dunni. Both secondary stripes usually begin
anteriorly as a series of spots or dashes and become continuous stripes
posteriorly; occasionally near the base of the tail they fuse with the primary
stripes on the 4th and 7th rows. In some specimens in Costa Rica indistinct
stripes are present on the 10th (posteriorly the 9th) rows, and in some
specimens in Honduras, Nicaragua, and Costa Rica similar indistinct stripes are
present on the 2nd row.

Usually there are more or less conspicuous dark spots laterally on the
ventrals, but in some specimens there are no spots. Except for the dark
lateral spots (when present) the ventrals are immaculate white. The dorsal
ground-color is a pale brown or brownish white in preserved specimens on the
1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th rows of scales where dark stripes or spots are not
present. The ground-color of the dorsum between the 5th rows on each side
is a somewhat darker shade of pale to medium brown.

Never is more than the lower one-third of each of the supralabials brown.
In many specimens little or no brown is present on the lower margins of
these scales. Some of the specimens having brown on the supralabials also
have dusky markings of tan or gray on the chin and infralabials. Specimens
from the northern part of the range (Guatemala) less frequently have dark
chins and supralabials than do specimens from the southern part of the range
(Costa Rica). There is, nevertheless, at any one locality considerable variation
in the amount of dark pigmentation present on the chin and supralabials,
thereby indicating that the slight geographic trend in this character is not
significant.

Probably the most common pattern of dorsal coloration consists of eight
or ten dark stripes (fig. 1, B). In snakes having this pattern the stripes on
the 1st, 3rd, 4th and 7th rows are always present and prominent, although
those on the 1st and 3rd rows sometimes are present as discontinuous rows of
dashes. The ground-color from the venter to the 7th row is usually pale
brown, and that dorsally between the 7th rows on each side is usually a darker,
medium brown. A series of spots or dashes or a continuous stripe is sometimes
present on the 8th row of scales.

Snakes having a larger number of dark stripes and more dark pigmentation
occur in the southern part of the range. There seems to be a cline from paler
snakes having fewer stripes in the north to darker snakes in the south.

    Fig. 3. Patterns of dorsal coloration
at mid-body of juveniles of two sympatric species of Conophis.
A. C. lineatus dunni (MCZ 49794) from Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
B. C. pulcher (MCZ 49791) from Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
Approximately × 1.

In juveniles, there are six or eight black stripes boldly contrasting with a
white or pale tan ground-color (fig. 3, A). The first pair of stripes is on the
[Pg_266]
1st scale-row; the second pair, on the 3rd and 4th scale-rows; the third pair,
on the 7th row; the fourth pair (when present), on the 8th row. Ontogenetic
change in coloration consists of the splitting of the second pair of dark stripes
in the juvenile. Additional stripes may form later on the 2nd and/or 10th
rows of dorsal scales.

Remarks.—Savage (1949:483-486) stated that his specimen of
C. l. dunni (from Honduras) resembled l. lineatus in having secondary
stripes on the 2nd and 8th rows and dark pigmentation
throughout the length of the 2nd row. As can be seen from the
preceding discussion of variation, a specimen having this color
pattern is clearly within the observed range of variation of l. dunni.
The specimen in no way represents an intergrade between C. l.
dunni
and l. lineatus.

A specimen in the British Museum (Natural History), catalogued
in 1853 (no. 53.2.4.16), has the locality listed as “México.” Since
this specimen is of C. l. dunni and this subspecies occurs only
south of México, the locality must be considered erroneous; possibly
the locality as recorded referred only to the fact that the
specimen came from tropical Middle America.

The absence of paravertebral stripes, the presence of a lateral
dark stripe on the nape involving the 3rd and 4th rows of scales,
and the darkly pigmented 1st scale-row, in combination with the
characteristics of the genus, distinguish C. l. dunni from all other
snakes in México and Central America. The only sympatric species
of this genus, C. pulcher, differs in that it has paravertebral stripes
(though never a vertebral dark stripe). Conophis pulcher has a
lateral dark stripe that includes the upper half of the second
scale-row on the anterior part of the body; stripes of C. l. dunni
never include more than the 3rd and 4th rows. Even as juveniles
the paravertebral row is not darkly pigmented in C. l. dunni as it
is in C. pulcher.

Distribution.—Semi-arid habitats from sea level to
elevations of 1000 m.
from the Cuilco Valley in western Guatemala, El Peten and British Honduras
southeastward to northeastern and southern Honduras, western Nicaragua and
northwestern Costa Rica (fig. 2).

Specimens examined.—Total of 41 specimens, as follows:
British Honduras:
Cayo District: Augustine, ERA-WTN BH-300; Mountain Pine Ridge,
10 mi. E Augustine
, ERA-WTN BH-298.

Costa Rica: no specific locality, AMNH 17309. “Cartago,” BMNH
71.11.22.15. Puntarenas: 32 km. N Barranca, KU 35630; Esparta, USNM
37758. “San José,” ANSP 3480, 12232.

El Salvador: Morazan: El Divisadero, CNHM 10999. San Miguel: San
Pedro
, MCZ 57061.

Guatemala: El Petén: Sojio (Toocog), AMNH 69969, 69986. Huehuetenango:
flood plain Río Cuilco, W of Finca Canibal, 18 km. N Tacaná,
UMMZ 98283. Santa Rosa: Santa Rosa, UMMZ 107339.

[Pg_267]
Honduras: no specific locality, AMNH 32814, UF 7657. Cortes: Cofradía,
SU 8422; Gracias, CNHM 28560; Hacienda de Santa Ana, W San Pedro
Sula
, CNHM 5297; San Pedro Sula, UMMZ 68695(2); near San Pedro Sula,
MCZ 27563. Francisco Morazan: Potrero de Melio, Escuela Agricola Pan-Americana,
MCZ 49987; Tegucigalpa, MCZ 49784, 49786, 49789-90, 49792, 49794.

Mexico: no specific locality, BMNH 53.2.4.16.

Nicaragua: no specific locality, UMMZ 65633, USNM 25237.
Leon: El Polvón, MCZ 5645, 5696. Managua: Managua, USNM 79963-64; 3 mi. SW
Managua
, KU 42315; 8 mi. WNW Managua, KU 42314; 1 mi. N Sabana
Grande
, KU 42311-13. Matagalpa: 1.5 mi. N Matagalpa, UMMZ 116537.


Conophis lineatus lineatus (Duméril, Bibron and
Duméril)

Tomodon lineatum (in part) Duméril, Bibron and Duméril,
Erpétologie Générale,
7(pt. 2):936-938, atlas, pl. 73, February 25, 1854; Bocourt,
Journ. de Zool., 5:406-407, 1876.

Tomodon lineatus, Jan, Arch. Zool. Anat. Fis., Genoa, 2(2):234, March
1863; Elenco sistematico degli ofidi. Milano, p. 57, 1863; Muller, Reisen
in den Vereinigten Staaten, Canada, und Mexico. Bd. 3. Beitrage zur
Geschichte, Statistik, und Zoologie von Mexiko. 3:607, 1865; Jan and
Sordelli, Iconographie Generale des Ophidiens, Milano. liv. 19, pl. 6,
fig. 3, December, 1866; liv. 50, pl. 2, fig. 34, November, 1881.

Tachymenis lineata (in part), Garman, Bull. Essex Inst., 16: 33, January
9, 1884; Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool., 8:60-61, July, 1884.

Conophis lineatus, Bocourt in Duméril, Bocourt and Mocquard, Mission Scientifique
au Mexique et dans l’Amerique Centrale, 2:643-644, pl. 38, fig. 5,
1886; Cope, Trans. Amer. Philos. Soc., 18:218, pl. 28, fig. 2, (hemipenis),
April 15, 1895; Boulenger, Catalogue of the Snakes in the British Museum
(Natural History), 3:122-123 (part), 1896; Cope, Ann. Rept. U. S.
Natl. Mus. for 1898, pp. 1094-1095, 1242, pl. 26, fig. 2, (hemipenis),
1900; Amaral, Mem. Inst. Butantan, 4:212, 1929; Mittleman, Copeia, no.
2:122, June 30, 1944.

Conophis lineatus lineatus, Smith, Journ. Washington Acad. Sci., 31:122,
March 15, 1941; Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus., 92:395, November 5, 1942;
Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus., 93:407, October 29, 1943; Smith and Taylor,
Bull. U. S. Natl. Mus., 187:43, October 5, 1945; Shannon and Smith,
Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 52:505, December 31, 1949; Smith and Taylor,
Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 33(pt. 2):351, March 20, 1950; Werler and
Smith, Texas Journ. Sci. 4(4):565, December 30, 1952; Fugler and
Dixon, Herpetologica, 14:186, December 1, 1958.

Type.—Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, no. 3738. Type locality.—”México,”
restricted to Veracruz, Veracruz, México, by Smith and Taylor
(1950:351). Little is known about the type specimen, and nothing, concerning
its collector or the locality at which it was collected. Smith (1941:122)
assumed that the specimen illustrated by Bocourt in Duméril, Bocourt, and
Mocquard (1886:pl. 38, fig. 5) was the type of C. l. lineatus. I have also
made this assumption concerning the identity of the type specimen of this
species, especially because of the many inconsistencies appearing in the plate
accompanying the description by Duméril, Bibron and Duméril (1854:pl. 73),
and by Jan and Sordelli (1866:pl. 6). Neither show the nape nor a regular
number of dorsal scales by which accurate determination of color pattern can
be made and by means of which C. l. dunni and C. l. lineatus can be separated.

Diagnosis.—Lateral dark stripe anteriorly passing through eye and posteriorly
involving fourth scale-row only; first scale-row darkly pigmented; no
[Pg_268]
paravertebral stripe; no dark pigment on vertebral row; six or eight dark
stripes at mid-body, secondary stripes often present posteriorly; usually eight
(sometimes seven) supralabials immaculate or having dark ventral margins.

Variation.—Twenty-six specimens have 157 to 169 (163.5 ± 3.59) ventrals.
Twenty of these snakes having complete tails have 60 to 73 (66.5 ± 4.26)
subcaudals; the number of ventrals plus subcaudals varies from 224 to 238
(230.1) in nineteen of these. In 26 specimens the reduction from 19 to 17
dorsal scale-rows takes place between ventrals 91 and 107 (100.2 ± 3.59).
Sexual dimorphism is evident in the number of subcaudals; nine females have
60 to 66 (62.4), and 11 males have 68 to 73 (69.8) subcaudals. The largest
specimen (AMNH 19643) is a male from “México,” having a body length
of 626 mm., a tail length of 168 mm. and a total length of 786 mm. No
small juveniles have been examined; the smallest specimen (AMNH 19618)
is a male from Veracruz, México, having a body length of 325 mm., a tail
length of 90 mm. and a total length of 415 mm.

The greatest variation is in coloration. In preserved specimens the ground-color
is white, tannish-white, or often pale blue, with dark stripes of black
or deep brown present dorsolaterally and laterally. Secondary stripes of
paler brown are sometimes present, but the pale browns have faded badly
on many specimens. Normally four black stripes are present at mid-body—a
lateral pair on the 4th row of dorsal scales and a dorsolateral
pair on the 7th row (fig. 1, D). The lateral pair is the posterior continuation
of the stripe that on the head passes through the eye; it continues on the
nape as a narrow stripe on the 4th row only. In a few specimens the lateral
stripe broadens to include the upper third of the 3rd row posterior to the
nape. In some specimens both the dorsolateral and lateral dark stripes
are present on the nape as a row of elongated spots or dashes that become
continuous stripes of even width one-third to one-half of the distance posteriorly
along the body; in other specimens the stripes are continuous on the
nape. Posterior to the place of dorsal scale-reduction from 19 to 17 rows
by the fusion of the 3rd and 4th rows, the lateral and dorsolateral stripes are
moved downward by one row. In some specimens secondary black or dark
brown stripes are present in the form of a series of dashes on the 5th and
8th rows; posterior to the place of scale reduction, these dashes are on the
4th and 7th rows. These dashes form a continuous stripe near the base of
the tail. On the tail the secondary and primary stripes on adjacent rows sometimes
fuse into a single broader stripe.

Usually the 1st row of dorsal scales is dark brown; in some specimens the
brown on the 1st or 7th row has faded in preservative. A few specimens
have small black spots on the moderate brown background of the 1st row;
in others the 1st row is only a somewhat darker brown than the ground-color.
The 2nd row sometimes is a medium brown, and appears to be an additional
stripe.

The ventrals usually have more or less conspicuous dark spots laterally;
in some specimens there are no spots. Except for the lateral spots (when
present) the ventrals are immaculate white. The dorsal ground-color is
pale brownish-white, white or pale blue between the 4th and 7th rows of
dorsal scales and dorsally between the 7th rows on each side. Stripes are
never present on the uniformly pale colored 8th, 9th and vertebral scale-rows.

Usually there are eight supralabials on each side; however, seven of the
27 specimens examined have seven supralabials on each side, and three others
[Pg_269]
have seven on one side, and eight on the other. Never is more than the
lower third of the supralabials dark brown. In many specimens little or no
brown is on the supralabials. There is little or no brown on the chin.

Variation in coloration and in number of supralabials appears to be of no
geographic significance.

Although no juveniles have been collected, I expect that juveniles resemble
adults in coloration. Probably there would be a greater contrast between the
dark stripes and the pale ground-color in juveniles.

In life an adult from three miles northwest of Lerdo de Tejada, Veracruz,
México (UMMZ 114484), had black stripes on the 4th and 7th rows of dorsal
scales, and black spots on a brown background on the 1st row. The 2nd row
had a medial, pale to medium brown auxiliary stripe on a brownish-white
background. Posterior to the nape the 3rd row was medium brown. The
area between the 4th and 7th rows and the dorsum between the 7th row of
scales on each side was a pale brownish-white. Posterior to the place of
scale-reduction the primary stripes were displaced downward by one row
to the 3rd and 6th rows and secondary stripes originated as elongated spots
on the 4th and 7th rows. Near the tail the secondary stripes were broad and
continuous. The head was white or tannish-white with three dark brown or
black stripes.

Remarks.—In his diagnosis of C. l. lineatus, Smith (1941:122)
states: “lateral dark stripe … very narrow posterior to nape,
extending along fourth scale row; posteriorly a stripe along third
and eighth (farther posteriorly the seventh) scale rows; a narrow
dark stripe along sixth scale row, continuous throughout length of
body….” I fail to find a dark stripe on the 6th row throughout
the length of the body. In all specimens that I have seen, there
is a dark stripe on the 7th row anteriorly and on the 6th row
posteriorly. In many specimens the stripes on the 3rd and 8th
(posteriorly the 7th) scale-rows are absent or present so far posteriorly
that the 8th row is never involved.

The dark brown on the first scale-row and the presence of a
lateral dark stripe on the 4th row of dorsal scales only, in combination
with the characteristics of the genus, distinguish C. l. lineatus from
all other snakes in México.

Distribution.—Semi-arid habitats on the coastal plain of Veracruz, México,
from Tecolutla to Lerdo de Tejada and Piedras Negras (fig. 2).

Specimens examined.—Total of 27, as follows:
México: no specific locality,
AMNH 19614-15, 19621-24, 19642-43, NMW 16827. Veracruz: no specific
locality
, AMNH 19618-20, CAS 73640, NMW 16829; 4 km. S Alvarado, KU
58124; 14 mi. N Alvarado, UIMNH 46978; 6 mi. SE Boca del Río, UIMNH
28023; Etiopa, 2 mi. S Tecolutla, UIMNH 3847; ca. 30 mi. E Jalapa, AMNH
81948; 3 mi. NW Lerdo de Tejada, UMMZ 114484-85; Paso del Macho,
USNM 109708; Río Blanco, 20 km. WNW Piedras Negras, KU 23253; Veracruz,
AMNH 19612, UF 8990; W side Veracruz, AMNH 19616; 2 mi. W
Veracruz
, AMNH 19617, 19619.

[Pg_270]


Conophis lineatus concolor Cope
Conophis vittatus Cope, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci.
Philadelphia, 13:300, December 28, 1861 (nec Peters, 1860;
type.—United States National Museum, no. 4941; type
locality—”Petén,” Guatemala); Journ. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia,
ser. 2, 8:137, 1876; Bull. U. S. Natl. Mus., 32:76, 1887.
Conophis concolor Cope, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia,
18:318-319, February 20, 1867; Journ. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia,
ser. 2, 8:137, 1876; Bocourt in Duméril, Bocourt and Mocquard,
Mission Scientifique au Mexique et dans l’Amerique Centrale, 2:648,
1886; Müller, Verh. Ges. Basel, 8:263, 1887; Cope, Bull. U. S. Natl.
Mus., 32:77; 1887; Ann. Rept. U. S. Natl. Mus. for 1898, p. 1095,
1900; Schmidt and Andrews, Zool. Ser. Field Mus. Nat. Hist., 20:178,
October 31, 1936; Andrews, Zool. Ser. Field Mus. Nat. Hist., 20:358,
December 28, 1937; Smith, Occas. Papers Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan,
388:7, October 31, 1938; Taylor and Smith, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull.,
25:253, July 10, 1939; Smith, Zool. Ser. Field Mus. Nat. Hist.,
24:31, January 30, 1939; Cochran, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., 220:167,
1961; Neill and Allen, Herpetologica, 17:44-46, fig. 3, April 15,
1961.
Conophis lineatus (in part), Günther, Biologica
Centrali-Americana, p. 165, March, 1895; Gaige in Pearse, et al.
Carnegie Inst. Washington Publ., 457:302, February 5, 1936.
Conophis lineaticeps Cope, Ann. Rept. U. S. Natl. Mus. for 1898,
pp. 1094-95, 1900 (Substitute name for Conophis vittatus Cope,
1861, nec Peters, 1860).
Conophis lineatus concolor, Smith, Journ. Washington Acad. Sci.,
31:122-123, March 15, 1941; Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus., 92:395, November
5, 1942; Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus., 93:407, October 29, 1943; Smith and
Taylor, Bull. U. S. Natl. Mus., 187:43, October 5, 1945; Univ.
Kansas Sci. Bull., 33(pt. 2):352, March 20, 1950.

Types.—Two in the United States National Museum, no. 12368 (two
specimens). Type locality: “Yucatán,” restricted to Chichén Itzá, Yucatán,
México by Smith and Taylor (1950:352).

Diagnosis.—Dark stripes either absent posterior to the nape,
or present as a row of small spots on fourth or seventh scale-row;
no dark stripe on first scale-row; eight supralabials having dark
ventral margins.

Variation.—Forty-five specimens have 158 to 170 (163.7
± 1.56) ventrals. Thirty-eight of these snakes having complete
tails have 56 to 74 (66.7 ± 4.77) subcaudals; the number of
ventrals plus subcaudals varies from 222 to 245 (230.6). In 45
specimens the reduction from 19 to 17 dorsal scales takes place
between ventrals 89 and 114 (102.5 ± 5.57). Sexual dimorphism
is evident in the number of subcaudals; 16 females have 56 to 65
(61.8), and 22 males have 68 to 74 (70.3) subcaudals. The longest
specimen (USNM 46395) is a male from Chichén Itzá, Yucatán, having a
body length of 893 mm., a tail length of 274 mm., and a total length
of 1167 mm. A juvenile (AMNH 38833) from Chichén Itzá, Yucatán, has
a body length of 194 mm., a tail length of 50 mm., and a total
length of 244 mm.

The venter is immaculate white or pale yellow and the dorsum of the
body is immaculate pale gray to pale olive. Some specimens have small
dark brown spots on the tips of the scales of the 4th or of the 7th row, but
never on both. Only on the nape are spots present on both the 4th and the
7th rows; these spots are the posterior continuations of the dark stripes
on the head and on many specimens do not reach the nape. Posterior
to the place of scale reduction from 19 to 17 rows by the fusion of the
3rd and 4th rows of scales, the dark spots (when present) are on the
3rd or 6th row of scales.

[Pg_271]
The coloration of juveniles is the same as that of adults. Color in life
is thought not too different from that of preserved specimens, for notes on the
color of living individuals (Neill and Allen, 1961:44) agree with what I have
observed on preserved snakes.

Remarks.—The specimen from “Petén” (USNM, no. 4941) is the
only specimen that has a controversial history. As can be seen from
the synonymy of the species, the relationship of this specimen
with the rest of the genus has been interpreted in several ways.
Smith (1941:122-123) stated that the above specimen was catalogued
as being from El Salvador; however, the locality was presumed
by him to be El Petén, Guatemala, due to the presence in
the bottle of a piece of paper inscribed “Conophis vittatus, Petén,
J. M. Dow.” This specimen is the one mentioned by Cope
(1861:300, 1876:76, and 1900:1094-95), and in the first paper is
ascribed to Guatemala. In 1900 this specimen was named C.
lineaticeps
by Cope who thought the specimen differed significantly
from C. concolor (Cope, 1867:318-319). This specimen has the
coloration normal for C. l. concolor as far posteriorly as mid-body;
beyond mid-body the dark lines, typical of C. l. lineatus or of C. l.
dunni
, are present. It is likely that this specimen is an intergrade
between C. l. concolor and C. l. dunni, the other subspecies present
in Guatemala.

The only specimen not from the Yucatán Peninsula is allegedly
from Patuca, Honduras (USNM 20271). It was obtained in the
1870’s. Possibly more collecting will verify the presence of C. l.
concolor
in northern Honduras. This individual may be merely a
genetically aberrant specimen from an area where normal specimens
are C. l. dunni. Neill and Allen (1961:44-45) suggested that
the specimen from Patuca implies widely overlapping distributions
for C. l. dunni and C. concolor. The occurrence of C. l. concolor in
Honduras needs to be verified before this assumption is made.
There can, therefore, at present be no objection to the view that
intergradation between the subspecies C. l. dunni and C. l. concolor
could occur through a relatively broad area of El Petén and British
Honduras.

Neill and Allen (1961:44-45) further suggest that the present
range of C. l. dunni extends “presumably still farther northward
toward the Méxican state of Veracruz where C. l. lineatus exists.”
Actually the presence of the subspecies C. l. dunni and C. l. lineatus
as presently disjunct populations implies merely that they were
presumably a continuous population at some time in the past.

The characteristics of the genus in combination with the reduction
[Pg_272]
of dark coloration posterior to the head distinguish this snake
from all other snakes in México and Central America.

Distribution.—The Yucatán Peninsula: eastern Campeche, all of Yucatán,
probably in Quintana Roo, and the northern third of British Honduras. A
record for northeastern Honduras is questioned (fig. 2).

Specimens examined.—Total of 48, as follows:
British Honduras: Belize
District
: 13.0 mi. W, 1.5 mi. S Belize, ERA-WTN BH-1562.

Guatemala: El Petén, no specific locality, USNM 4941.

Honduras: Colón: Patuca, USNM 20271.

México: Campeche: Champotón, UMMZ 73063-66; Encarnación, CNHM
106462. Yucatán: no specific locality, BMNH 80.7.13.30; Chichén Itzá,
AMNH 38826, 38833, CNHM 20610-11, 26986-87, 36299-300, 36303-04,
36307, 36316, MCZ 7422, 28748, UMMZ 68236, 73060-62, 80806, USNM
46395; Kantunil, CNHM 36301, 36305-06, 36308-09, 36312-13; Libré Union,
CNHM 36298, 36302, 36310-11, 36314; Mayapán, CNHM 40720; Mérida,
CNHM 19411, 19413, NMW 16828; Progreso, CNHM 40721; Tekom, CNHM
49374; Yokdzonot, CNHM 36315.


Conophis nevermanni Dunn
Coniophanes imperialis imperialis, Wettstein, Sitz.
Akad. Wiss. Wien. mathem-naturw. Kl., 143:37-38, 1934.
Conophis nevermanni Dunn, Copeia, no. 4:214, December 31, 1937; Smith,
Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus., 92:395, November 5, 1942; Savage, Trans. Kansas
Acad. Sci., 50:484, December 31, 1949; Taylor, Univ. Kansas Sci.
Bull., 34(pt. 1): 145-146, October 1, 1951.

Type.—Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, no. 22423, obtained
by Emmet R. Dunn from Prof. Manuel Valerio. Type locality: Río Poas de
Aserri (a few miles south of San José), Costa Rica.

Diagnosis.—Head and body dark brown or black above with two or four
white stripes along body; usually two white lines on head immediately above
eye passing from canthus rosetralis posteriorly to connect with white stripe on
6th row of dorsal scales; eight supralabials with black margins above.

Variation.—Six specimens have 173 to 183 (176.5 ± 4.00) ventrals. Five
of these snakes having complete tails have 71 to 89 (80.6 ± 7.15) subcaudals;
the number of ventrals plus subcaudals varies from 250 to 263 (257.0).
In the six specimens the reduction from 19 to 17 dorsal scales takes place between
ventrals 84 and 97 (93.2 ± 4.71). Sexual dimorphism is evident in
the number of subcaudals; two females have 71 and 76 (73.5), and three
males have 82 to 89 (85.3) subcaudals. The longest specimen (ANSP 22424)
is a female from San José, Costa Rica, having a body length of 660 mm., a
tail length of 168 mm. and a total length of 828 mm.

The dorsal coloration (fig. 1, E) varies from a black ground-color with
two or four narrow white stripes to a dark brown ground-color with a series
of black stripes and four white stripes. In the black specimens there are no
dark stripes. The darkest specimen (NMW 16838:1) has only two white
stripes; these more or less continuous stripes are on the ventral third of the
2nd row of scales and occasionally on the dorsalmost part of the first scale-row.
The venter is immaculate white except for black on the tips of the ventral
scales. The dorsum above the 2nd scale-row is uniform black. There are
no white stripes on the head.

[Pg_273]
The palest specimen (NMW 16838:2) has four dorsal white stripes; the
lateral pair of these stripes is on the ventral half of the 2nd and the dorsal
third of the 1st scale-rows; the dorsolateral pair is on the dorsal two-thirds of
the 6th and the ventral third of the 7th rows of scales. This latter stripe is
the posterior continuation of the white stripe on the head, which originates
immediately posterior to the rostral scale and passes posteriorly along the
canthus rostralis and along the lateral margin of the supraocular scale to the
nape. Posterior to the place of scale reduction, the dorsolateral white stripe
is displaced ventrally one scale-row. Except for black flecks or spots on the
lateral margins of the ventrals, the venter is immaculate white. The dorsum
above the lateral white stripes is brown and black; there is a pair of dorsolateral
white stripes. The dorsal half of the 2nd, most of the 3rd, 4th and
5th rows of scales are black; the dorsal margin of the 3rd, both margins of
the 4th, and the ventral margin of the 5th rows are paler brown. The dorsal
two-thirds of the 7th, all but the dorsal most part of the 8th, and the middle
two-thirds of the 10th scale-rows are black; the areas between are a medium
brown.

Only six specimens are available on which to base a description of the
variation in this species. Furthermore, there are no juveniles, notes on the
colors of living individuals, or photographs of this species.


Fig. 4. Selected locality records for Conophis pulcher
and Conophis nevermanni.

Remarks.—Taylor (1955:563-565) hesitantly referred a specimen
(KU 35630) from 32 kilometers north of Barranca, Puntarenas
[Pg_274]
Province, Costa Rica, to Conophis lineatus nevermanni. This
specimen, a female, has 169 ventrals and ventral scale-reduction taking
place opposite the 109th ventral; both of these characters are well
out of the range of C. nevermanni. Furthermore, the ventral margins
of the supralabials are brown, and the pale dorsal stripes are
tan and too wide for C. nevermanni (compare figs. 1, C and E).
The specimen definitely is C. lineatus dunni, and corresponds well
with another specimen from Costa Rica (ANSP 12232).

The dark brown or black dorsum with two or four white stripes
and the presence of eight supralabials having dark brown dorsal
margins, in combination with the characters of the genus, serve
to distinguish Conophis nevermanni from other Central American
snakes.

Distribution.—Pacific coastal plain of northwestern Costa Rica and the
Meseta Central of central Costa Rica (fig. 4).

Specimens examined.—Total of six, as follows:
Costa Rica: Guanacaste:
Bebedero, Río Tenorio, NMW 16838(5). “San José,” ANSP 22424.


Conophis pulcher Cope
Tomodon lineatus (in part), Salvin, Proc. Zool.
Soc. London, 28:455, 1860.
Conophis pulcher Cope, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 20(5):308,
1869; Journ. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, ser. 2, 8:137, 1876; Bocourt
in Duméril, Bocourt and Mocquard, Mission Scientifique au Mexique et
dans l’Amerique Centrale, 2:646-648, pl. 38, fig. 6, 1886; Ferrai-Perez,
Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus., p. 196, September 28, 1886; Cope, Bull. U. S.
Natl. Mus., 32:77, 1887; Trans. Amer. Philos. Soc., 18:194, April 15,
1895; Ann. Rept. U. S. Natl. Mus. for 1898, p. 1095, 1900; Alvarez del
Toro, Reptiles de Chiapas, pp. 154-155, 1960.
Tomodon pulcher, Bocourt, Journ. de Zool., p. 408, 1876.
Conophis pulcher var. similis Bocourt in Duméril, Bocourt and Mocquard,
Mission Scientifique au Mexique et dans l’Amerique Centrale, 2:647-648,
pl. 38, fig. 6, 1886 [Type.—Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle,
Paris, no. 6090; type locality.—unknown, restricted to Tonalá, Chiapas,
by Smith and Taylor (1950:326)].
Conophis lineatus, Günther, Biologia Centrali-Americana, p. 165, March,
1895; Boulenger, Catalogue of the Snakes in the British Museum (Natural
History), 3:122-123, 1896; Stuart, Occas. Papers Mus. Zool. Univ.
Michigan, 292:5, June 29, 1934; Slevin, Proc. California Acad. Sci. 4th
Ser., 23:409, December 29, 1939.
Conophis pulcher pulcher, Smith, Journ. Washington Acad. Sci., 31:121,
March 15, 1941; Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus., 92:395, November 5, 1942;
Stuart, Contr. Lab. Vert. Biol. Univ. Michigan, 65:19-20 (part),
March, 1954; Contr. Lab. Vert. Biol. Univ. Michigan, 68:63, November,
1954; Cochran, Bull. U. S. Natl. Mus., 220:167, 1961.
Conophis pulcher plagosus Smith, Journ. Washington Acad. Sci. 31:121-122,
March 15, 1941 (Type.—United States National Museum, no. 109707;
type locality: Tonalá, Chiapas); Smith and Taylor, Univ. Kansas Sci.
Bull., 33(pt. 2):326, March 20, 1950; Stuart, Contr. Lab. Vert. Biol.
Univ. Michigan, 65:19-20, March, 1954; Cochran, Bull. U. S. Natl. Mus.,
220:167, 1961.
Conophis pulcher similis, Smith, Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus., 92:395, November
5, 1942; Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus., 93:408, October 29, 1943; Smith and
Taylor, Bull. U. S. Natl. Mus., 187:43-44, October 5, 1945; Univ.
[Pg_275]
Kansas Sci. Bull., 33(pt. 2):43-44, March 20, 1950; Maldonado-Koerdell,
Inst. Mexicanos Recursos Nat. Renov. pp. 132-133, 1953.

Types.—Three in the United States National Museum, nos. 6751 (2 specimens)
and 6803, obtained by Henery Hague. Type locality: “Petén,” or
“Verapaz,” Guatemala. There is much doubt about localities for many of
Hague’s specimens collected in the 1860’s (Stuart, 1948:10). Since Conophis
pulcher
is found predominantly in semi-arid environments, the types might
have come from the semi-arid Cahabón, Negro, or Salamá river basins—all
places near the sugar plantation that Hague managed at San Jerónimo, Baja
Verapaz. Possibly the types were obtained from as far away as the Motagua
Valley or the southeastern highlands of Guatemala, both of which areas Hague
is known to have visited.

Diagnosis.—Paravertebral stripes present at least posteriorly
(fig. 1, F); eight or ten stripes at mid-body; lateral
dark stripe passing through eye anteriorly and including at least upper
one-half of second scale-row from neck region posteriorly to place of scale
reduction near mid-body; eight supralabials immaculate or having dark
ventral margins.

Variation.—Twenty-six specimens have 161 to 182 (169.5 ± 5.31) ventrals.
Eighteen of these snakes with complete tails have 65 to 79 (70.6 ± 3.93) subcaudals;
the number of ventrals plus subcaudals varies from 231 to 251
(239.3). In 26 specimens the reduction from 19 to 17 dorsal scales takes
place between ventrals 94 and 119 (104.6 ± 4.90). Sexual dimorphism is
evident in the number of subcaudals; eleven females have 65 to 71 (68.2),
and seven males have 70 to 79 (74.3) subcaudals. The longest specimen
(AMNH 58364) is a female from El Zamarano, Honduras, having a body
length of 703 mm., a tail length of 164 mm. and a total length of 867 mm.
The smallest juvenile (MCZ 49793) from Tegucigalpa, Honduras, has a body
length of 162 mm., a tail length of 46 mm. and a total length of 208 mm.

The dorsal ground-color is pale brown or white; black or dark brown
stripes are present dorsally and laterally. Normally ten stripes are present
at mid-body; the first pair on the first row of dorsal scales; the second pair
on the upper half of 2nd and lower part of 3rd rows; the third pair on 4th
row; the fourth pair on 7th and sometimes part of 8th rows; the fifth pair
(paravertebral stripes) on the 9th row. Posterior to the place of reduction
from 19 to 17 rows by the fusion of the 3rd and 4th rows, the third, fourth
and fifth pairs of stripes are displaced downward one row. Sometimes the
second and third pairs of stripes are fused resulting in only eight stripes at
mid-body. On some specimens the fourth and fifth pairs of stripes are close
together, but in none are they fused so as to result in a pattern of six stripes
at mid-body.

The paravertebral stripes begin anteriorly on the nape or at any point
on the anterior one-third of the body and continue as discrete stripes onto the
base of the tail. Anteriorly these stripes are always broken into a series of
dashes; posteriorly the stripes are continuous. In specimens in which the
paravertebral stripes do not begin on the anterior-most part of the body, there
is no paravertebral pigmentation anteriorly.

In addition to the paravertebrals, the other dorsal dark stripes are variable.
In some specimens the stripes are present anteriorly and gradually disappear
near mid-body (the first dark stripe only on three specimens). In other
[Pg_276]
specimens the stripes are present anteriorly as dashes and become continuous
at mid-body; in others the stripes are continuous throughout. Posteriorly
continuous stripes are of uniform width; anteriorly sometimes they are wide
on the tip of each scale and narrow on the base (fig. 1, F). The variation
in continuity and width described above is found in all of the dorsal dark
stripes.

The ventrals usually have more or less conspicuous dark spots laterally; in
some specimens there are no spots. Except for the dark lateral spots, when
present, the ventrals are immaculate white. Usually the dorsal ground-color
is a pale tan, especially between the first and second, and the third and fourth
dark stripes. The areas between the second and third dark stripes and across
the dorsum between the fourth stripes on each side are pale brown. In some
specimens the dorsum between the paravertebral stripes is still paler brown.

Never is more than the lower third of the supralabials brown. Many specimens
have little brown, and others none. In most of those specimens having
brown on the supralabials, the chin and infralabials are dusky tan or gray.
There is little or no brown on the supralabials or the chin in the northern
part of the range (Chiapas), whereas the greatest amount of brown on the
labials and chin is found on some specimens from the southern part of the
range (Honduras). Since there is considerable variation in the amount of
brown on the chin and labials of specimens from single localities, the slight
geographic trend in this character seemingly is not significant.

In juveniles six black or dark brown stripes boldly contrast with a white
or pale tan ground-color. At mid-body the first pair of dark stripes is on the
1st scale row; the second pair on the 3rd and 4th rows; the third pair
on the 7th, 8th and at least the lower half of the 9th rows (fig. 3, B).
Ontogenetic change in coloration consists of the splitting of the second and
third pairs of dark stripes in the juvenile. The first stripe does not split.
Consequently adults have ten dark stripes.

In life an adult from Tonalá, Chiapas, had black stripes. The ground-color
below the second stripe, and between the third and fourth dark stripes was
tan. The area between the second and third dark stripes was reddish-brown,
as was the dorsum between the fourth pair of dark stripes, except that the
10th scale-row was paler.

Three excellent photographs of this species have been published under
the name Conophis lineatus (Ditmars, 1931:pls. 26 and 27).

Remarks.—Smith (1941:121-122) described C. pulcher plagosus
from Tonalá, Chiapas, and characterized the subspecies by its
having “(1) the ventrals completely unspotted; (2) secondary lines
on paravertebral rows not continuous posteriorly; (3) all other
lines on body also somewhat spotted in appearance; (4) dusky
markings on chin and supralabial border very dim (less distinct
than in p. pulcher or any member of the lineatus series).” Although
all Chiapan specimens lack ventral spots, specimens from Guatemala
have no spots, small spots, or large spots. Even in specimens
from Tegucigalpa, Honduras, the southernmost limit of the range,
[Pg_277]
the spotting varies from a few inconspicuous spots to many large
spots. Paravertebral rows were continuous posteriorly in alimens
examined by me. Likewise, all other stripes were continuous
bands of uniform width posteriorly, having appeared anteriorly as
rows of spots or dashes. The amount of brown on the chin and
labials has been shown previously not to be geographically significant.
The absence of characters of adequate significance to separate
populations precludes the naming of subspecies in this species.

Mertens (1952a:93, and 1952b:61-62) designated three specimens
from El Salvador as C. pulcher plagosus. In the latter paper, Mertens,
on the basis of a description of a specimen of “C. lineatus” from
Divisadero, El Salvador, given by Schmidt (1928:200), referred that
specimen also to C. pulcher plagosus. I have examined this specimen
and refer it to C. lineatus dunni. Although I have not seen
Merten’s specimens, on the basis of the excellent descriptions given
by Mertens (1952b:61-62), I refer the three Salvadoranean specimens
to C. lineatus dunni.

The presence of paravertebral stripes in combination with the
characteristics of the genus distinguish Conophis pulcher from all
other snakes in southern México and Central America. The only
sympatric species of this genus, C. lineatus dunni, differs in that it
lacks paravertebral stripes, although it may have a single vertebral
stripe. Conophis lineatus dunni has lateral dark stripes that are
present on the 3rd and 4th scale-rows, never on the anterior third
of the body as in C. pulcher. Even in juveniles the third pair of
dark stripes includes the lower part of the 9th scale-row in C. pulcher,
whereas the dorsal most dark stripe of C. lineatus dunni never
includes more than the lower part of the 8th scale-row.

Distribution.—Pacific coastal region of Chiapas, México, southeastward
into Guatemala; southeastern highlands and the dry valley of central and
eastern Guatemala; Caribbean lowlands of Honduras southward to the region
of Tegucigalpa, Honduras (fig. 4).

Specimens examined.—Total of 27, as follows:
Guatemala: no specific
locality
, CNHM 22912, NMW 16830. Jutiapa: Hacienda Mongoy, UMMZ
106725. El Progreso: El Progreso, CAS 67000; El Rancho, UMMZ 106724;
San Antonio, CAS 66999. “Peten,” USNM 6751(2), 6803. Sacatepequez:
Dueñas, BMNH 64.1.26.17, 64.1.26.126-127. Zacapa: Pepesca, AMNH
72555-56.

Honduras: no specific locality, AMNH 58364. Cortes: San Pedro Sula,
CNHM 5295-96. Francisco Morazan: El Zamarano, AMNH 70189; Tegucigalpa,
MCZ 49785, 49787-88, 49791, 49793, 49795.

México: Chiapas: Soconusco, UIMNH 33646-47; Tonalá, USNM 109707.


Conophis vittatus Peters

Tomodon lineatum (in part), Duméril, Bibron and
Duméril,
Erpétologie Générale,
7(pt. 2):936-938, February 25, 1854.
Conophis vittatus Peters, Monatsb. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, pp. 519-520, pl.,
[Pg_278]
fig. 3, October, 1860; Cope, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., 11:162, 1870; Bocourt
in Duméril, Bocourt and Mocquard, Mission Scientifique au
Mexique et dans l’Amerique Centrale, 2:644-646, pl. 38, fig. 7, 1886;
Günther, Biologia Centrali-Americana, p. 165, March, 1895; Boulenger,
Catalogue of the Snakes in the British Museum (Natural History),
3:123-124, 1896; Cope, Amer. Nat., 30:1024, 1896; Ann. Rept. U. S.
Natl. Mus. for 1898, pp. 1094-1095, 1232, 1900; Gadow, Proc. Zool. Soc.
London, 2:225, 1905; Amaral, Mem. Inst. Butantan, 4:211, 1929;
Gadow, Jorullo, p. 55, 1930; Smith, Zool. Ser. Field Mus. Nat. Hist.,
24:31-32, January 30, 1939; Taylor and Smith, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull.,
25:252-253, pl. 23, July 10, 1939; Stuart, Contr. Lab. Vert. Biol. Univ.
Michigan, 65:23, March, 1954; Alvarez del Toro, Reptiles de Chiapas,
pp. 153-154, 1960.
Conophis lineatus Cope, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 16(3):167, 1864
[nec Duméril, Bibron and Duméril,
Erpétologie Générale,
7(pt. 2):936-938, atlas, pl. 73, February 25, 1854; specimen from Colima];
Sumichrast, Arch. Sci. Nat., p. 246, 1873.
Tomodon vittatus, Bocourt, Journ. de Zool., p. 407, 1876.
Conophis sumichrasti sumichrasti Cope, Journ. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia,
ser. 2, 8:137, 1876 (Types.—United States National Museum, nos. 29123,
30258; type locality.—Tehuantepec, México); Bull. U. S. Natl. Mus.,
32:77, 1887; Smith and Taylor, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 33(pt. 2):334,
March 20, 1950; Maldonado-Koerdell, Inst. Mexicanos Recursos Nat.
Renov., p. 124, 1953.
Conophis sumichrasti viduus Cope, Journ. Acad. Nat. Sci., Philadelphia,
ser. 2, 8:137, 1876 (Type.—United States National Museum, no. 30259;
type locality.—Tehuantepec, México); Bull. U. S. Natl. Mus., 32:77,
1887; Cochran, Bull. U. S. Natl. Mus., 220:167, 1961.
Conophis sumichrasti, Cope, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., 18:271, August 11,
1879; Sumichrast, Bull. Soc. Zool. France, p. 182, 1880; Cope, Trans.
Amer. Philos. Soc., 18:194, April 15, 1895; Cochran, Bull. U. S. Natl.
Mus., 220:167, 1961.
Tachymenis lineata (in part), Garman, Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool., 8:60-61,
July, 1884.
Conophis vittatus sumichrasti, Cope, Ann. Rept. U. S. Natl. Mus. for 1898,
p. 1095, 1900.
Conophis vittatus videns Cope, Ann. Rept. U. S. Natl. Mus., for 1898, p.
1095, 1900 (apparent lapus for viduus).
Conophis vittatus vittatus, Cope, Ann. Rept. U. S. Natl. Mus. for 1898,
p. 1095, 1900; Smith, Journ. Washington Acad. Sci., 31:119-120,
March 15, 1941; Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus., 92:395, November 5, 1942;
Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus., 93:408, October 29, 1943; Ann. Carnegie Mus.,
30:91, November 2, 1944; Smith and Taylor, Bull. U. S. Natl. Mus.,
187:44, October 5, 1945; Smith, Rev. Soc. Mexicanos Hist. Nat., 7:71,
December, 1946; Smith and Taylor, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 33(pt. 2):331,
March 20, 1950; Davis and Smith, Herpetologica, 8:134, January 30,
1953; Maldonado-Koerdell, Inst. Mexicanos Recursos Nat. Renov., p. 130,
1953; Peters, Occas. Papers Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan, 554:22, June
23, 1954; Duellman, Occas. Papers Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan, 560:15,
October 22, 1954; Webb and Fugler, Herpetologica, 13:35, March 30,
1957; Duellman, Occas. Papers Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan, 589:15,
March 21, 1958; Zweifel, Amer. Mus. Novitates, 1949:2, 5, June 17,
1959; Duellman, Univ. Kansas Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist., 15(1):91-92, December
20, 1961.
Conophis vittata, Gadow, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 2:196, 1905; Through
Southern Mexico, p. 181, 1908.
Conophis viduus, Smith, Zool. Ser. Field Mus. Nat. Hist., 24:31, January
30, 1939; Hartweg and Oliver, Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan,
47:26-27, July 13, 1940.

[Pg_279]

Conophis vittatus viduus, Smith, Journ. Washington Acad. Sci., 31:120-121,
March 15, 1941; Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus., 92:395, November 5, 1942;
Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus., 93:408, October 29, 1943; Woodbury and
Woodbury, Journ. Washington Acad. Sci., 34(11):370, 1944; Smith
and Taylor, Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus., 187:44, October 5, 1945; Univ.
Kansas Sci. Bull., 33(pt. 2):340, March 20, 1950; Werler and Smith,
Texas Journ. Sci., 4:565, fig. 16, December 30, 1952; Maldonado-Koerdell,
Inst. Mexicanos Recursos Nat. Renov., p. 130, 1953; Davis
and Dixon, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 72:82-83, July 24, 1959.
Conophis vittatus vittatus × Conophis vittatus viduus, Alvarez del Toro
and Smith, Herpetologica, 12:13, March 6, 1956.

Type.—Zoologisches Museum Berlin. Type locality not given, for the
specimen was purchased from a dealer in Hamburg. The type locality was
first restricted to “Acapulco,” Guerrero, by Smith (1941:119), then to
Laguna Coyuca, Guerrero, México, by Smith and Taylor (1950:331).

Diagnosis.—Three or four dorsal dark stripes, each involving two or
more adjacent scale-rows; never having brown or black on the 1st scale-row;
seven supralabials immaculate white or pale tannish-white.

Variation.—One hundred
seventy-one specimens have 149 to 181
(163.7 ± 6.33) ventrals. One hundred fifty-three of these having complete
tails have 55 to 76 (64.8 ± 4.90) subcaudals; the number of ventrals plus
subcaudals varies from 214 to 245 (228.5). In 170 specimens the reduction
from 19 to 17 dorsal scales takes place between ventrals 84 and 118
(102.3 ± 6.60). Sexual dimorphism is evident in the number of subcaudals;
58 females have 55 to 66 (60.0) and 95 males have 59 to 76 (67.8) subcaudals.
The longest specimen (AMNH 68004) is a male from Escurano,
Oaxaca, México, having a body length of 668 mm., a tail length of 182 mm.
and a total length of 850 mm. A juvenile (CNHM 40435) from
Tehuantepec,
Oaxaca, México, has a body length of 133 mm., a tail length of 31 mm. and
a total length of 164 mm.

Variation in coloration is of such magnitude that it has been used as
the basis for recognition of subspecies. Unfortunately, until this time,
most specimens reported upon in the literature represented the two extremes
of variation. After examining the coloration of 174 specimens with respect
to geographic distribution, I conclude that only one highly variable species
is represented. Specimens from the northern and western parts of the
range (Michoacán, Colima, and Durango) have the color pattern of C.
vittatus
as described by Peters (1860:518-521); these snakes have four
narrow black stripes on a white or pale tan background, and an immaculate
white venter. The lateral dark stripe, which on the head passes through
the eye, is present on the dorsal half of the 3rd and the ventral half of
the 4th scale-rows; the dorsolateral dark stripe, which passes along the
middle of the head and splits on the nape, is present on the middle of
the 8th scale-row. The other extreme in color pattern consists of three
broad stripes; the two dorsolateral stripes are fused. This pattern is
prevalent in specimens from the area around Tehuantepec, Oaxaca. The
lateral stripes include the dorsal half to two-thirds of the 2nd, all of the
3rd and 4th, and half of the 5th scale-rows; the fused dorsolateral stripes
sometimes cover all of the area dorsal to and including the dorsal third of
the 7th scale-row.

Snakes from areas between Tehuantepec and the margins of the distribution
[Pg_280]
of this species are variously intermediate between the extremes described
above. In some snakes from these areas the lateral stripes are broad and include
either the dorsal half of the 2nd scale-row or the ventral half of the 5th
scale-row, but not both on the same specimen. Also, the dorsolateral stripes
are broad and include most of the 9th and a part of the 10th scale-rows. Many
specimens from the area around Tehuantepec, where the three-striped pattern
is prevalent, have an intermediate pattern. Some have white on the center
of the 10th scale-row or lateral stripes that are not so broad as to include the
3rd and 4th and half of each of the 2nd and 5th scale-rows.

The supralabials are immaculate white or pale tan, except that in some
specimens the dorsalmost part of some supralabials are dark brown or black
as they are included in the ventral boundary of the dark stripe that passes
through the eye. There are no dusky markings on the chin or on any of
the ventral scales.

There is no ontogenetic change in color pattern; juveniles have the same
coloration as adults from the same geographic area.

Color in life is not greatly different from that of preserved specimens. One
specimen (UMMZ 114483) from 10.8 miles south of
Oaxaca, had in
life black stripes, a pale yellowish tan dorsal ground-color and a pale off-white
venter.

An excellent photograph of this species appears in Schmidt and Inger
(1957:230) under the name Conophis lineatus.

Remarks.—I have been unable to find variation of geographic
importance in scutellation in this species. A wide range of
variation in the characters of scutellation is present in specimens
from most localities; it shows no significant clinal or geographic
trends. As I have stated previously, in the discussion of variation,
coloration has been the feature primarily used by previous workers
to distinguish two “subspecies” for this species; C. vittatus vittatus
having four black stripes and C. vittatus viduus having three black
stripes. Most of the three-striped snakes occur in the vicinity
of Tehuantepec, Oaxaca, whereas the four-striped snakes are found
near the margins of the range of the species in Durango, Colima,
Michoacán, Morelos and Puebla. Specimens that would have to
be considered intergrades between the “subspecies” are found in
Michoacán, Guerrero, Oaxaca and Chiapas. At the time the subspecies
were proposed only specimens from Tehuantepec or from
marginal areas were known. Utilizing the large number of specimens
of this species presently available, geographic variation is
found to be clinal, from those with three stripes from near
Tehuantepec, through several intermediate patterns present on
specimens from single localities in Guerrero, Oaxaca and Chiapas,
to those with four dark stripes in areas farthest removed to the
north and west from Tehuantepec. Since only coloration shows
geographic variation, and since this variation represents a continuous
cline, subspecies cannot be recognized for this species.

[Pg_281]
The presence and position of the three or four dark stripes on
the body and the absence of brown on the 1st scale-row or on the
ventral scales, in combination with the generic characters, distinguish
Conophis vittatus from all other Méxican snakes. The
only other snake that occurs in western México that has been
confused with C. vittatus is Coniophanes piceivittus taylori, which
has 25, instead of 19, scale-rows.

Distribution.—Semi-arid habitats on Pacific slopes from extreme southern
Durango southeastward to Tuxtla Gutierrez, Chiapas, and inland in the
eastern Balsas Basin to Morelos and western Puebla (fig. 5).


Fig. 5. Selected locality records for
Conophis vittatus.

Specimens examined.—Total of 174, as follows: México: no specific locality,
AMNH 66150-52, SU 9465. Chiapas: Piedra Parada, USNM 121453.
Pizo de Oro, UIMNH 40821. Tuxtla Gutierrez, Parque Madero, UIMNH
37992-93, 38036-37. Colima: no specific locality, MCZ 46860, USNM 31394,
31396-97. 1 mi. SW Colima, AMNH 12783. S of Manzanillo, AMNH 19641.
Durango: Hacienda de Gabriel, AMNH 14217. Guerrero: Acahuizotla, TCWC
7419, 9469. 1 mi. W Acahuizotla, TCWC 7418. 3 mi. W Acapulco, AMNH
71626. 6 mi. E Acapulco, TCWC 9476-77. 10 mi. S Acapulco, TCWC 8578.
Agua del Obispo, CNHM 104948, TCWC 11586. near Chilpancingo, MVZ
45067, UMMZ 85722-23. 1 mi. SW Colotlipa, TCWC 9471-74. 2 mi. SW
Colotlipa
, TCWC 9475. 14 mi. S Ixtapán de la Sal, KU 67648. Laguna
Coyuca
, CNHM 25881, UMMZ 80942. near La Unión, AMNH 66337.
Magueyes, Laguna Coyuca, AMNH 66149. Playa Encantada, TCWC 9470.
1 mi. S Tierra Colorada, KU 67649. near Xaltinanguis, km. 405, CNHM
104947. Michoacán: Coalcomán, UMMZ 104693. 1/2 mi. SE Coalcomán,
UMMZ 104492. 1 mi. N. Coalcomán, UMMZ 112543. 1 mi. NE Coalcomán,
UMMZ 104692. Puerta de la Playa, UMMZ 105155. 12 mi. S
[Pg_282]
Tzitzio (by road), UMMZ 99153. Morelos: 12 km. NW Axochiapan, TCWC
7311, UIMNH 17613, 25924. 7 mi. SE Cuernavaca, MVZ 32258. Huajintlán,
km. 133
, CNHM 103270. 12 km. S Puente de Ixtla, km. 133, CNHM 104949.
Oaxaca: Bisiliana, AMNH 68010. near Caoba, foot of Cerro Arenal, AMNH
68009. Cerro Arenal, AMNH 68000-03. Cerro de Laollaga, UIMNH 36213.
Cerro de San Pedro, UIMNH 17616. Cerro Palma de Oro, UIMNH 37116.
C. Madrena, Sto. T. Quieri,” UIMNH 46904. near Chivela, MCZ 25021.
Cinco Cerros, UIMNH 37114. Dami Liesa, AMNH 66877, UIMNH 6158,
37115. Escuranos, AMNH 66873-74, 68004-06. Finca Santa Teresa, 2 km.
NW Tehuantepec
, UMMZ 82648. Huilotepec, AMNH 66878, UIMNH
40820. between Huilotepec and Tehuantepec, AMNH 65106, UMMZ 82644-45.
Las Tejas, UIMNH 6151-54. Mixtequilla, UIMNH 6157, 36211. between
Mixtequilla Mountains and Tehuantepec
, UMMZ 82652. between Niltepec
and “Carixxal,”
AMNH 68876. 10.8 mi. SE Oaxaca, UMMZ 114483. Quiengola,
UIMNH 17617. between Quiengola Mountains and Tehuantepec, UMMZ
82647. Rancho Poso Río, 6 km. S Tehuantepec, UIMNH 6144-49, 37117-19,
UMMZ 82649-51. Rincón Bamba, CNHM 105129-30, UIMNH 17615. Salazar,
AMNH 66875. vicinity of Salina Cruz, UMMZ 82653. San Gerónimo,
AMNH 4306, CNHM 1457. San Lucas Ixtepec, UIMNH 36206. San Juan
Lajarcia, UIMNH 36212. San Mateo del Mar, AMNH 65914. San Pablo,
UIMNH 36207. Santa María (Cerro de Liesa), AMNH 68011. Tapanatepec,
MCZ 27806-11. Tehuantepec, AMNH 19644, 65107-09, 65907-13 plus 7,
66871-72, 66879, 68007-08, CNHM 40435-36, 105126-28, MCZ 46403, UIMNH
6150, 17614, 17618, 29692, 36208, 37120-21, UMMZ 82642-43, 82646, USNM
109709-14, 1-2 leagues SSE Tehuantepec, UMMZ 82639-41. Tenango,
UIMNH 36209-10. between Tlacolulita and Tequisistlán, CNHM 105125.
Yerba Santa, UIMNH 6155-56. Puebla: Atencingo, KU 39626.


Skull

In studying the osteology of the genus Conophis, I have examined
two complete skeletons (one C. vittatus and one C. lineatus); two
additional skulls of C. vittatus and C. lineatus; and 24 sets of
dentigerous bones, representing all of the species. Terminology
of the skeletal elements is that of Duellman (1958), Parker (1878),
Radovanovic (1937) and Szunyoghy (1932). The drawing of
the right side of the skull of a specimen of Tomodon lineatus that
appears in Jan and Sordelli (1881:liv. 50, pl. 2, fig. 34) is of little
value due to its small size and lack of detail.

The skull of Conophis is typical of a relatively unspecialized
colubrid snake. Skulls of Conophis lineatus concolor and C. vittatus
closely resemble each other. The following description is based
primarily on the skull of C. lineatus concolor (UMMZ S-778).

The elements are discussed in the following order: nasal region,
cranium and associated elements, maxillo-palatal-pterygoid arch,
mandible, dentition, and vertebrae.

Nasal region.—The premaxillary is relatively heavy and has a concavity
posteroventrally. The lateral processes slope downward, but remain fairly
thick, and do not project far laterally. This shape (fig. 6) tends to strengthen
the nasal region; this anterior strengthening may be a reflection of the fossorial
habits of these snakes. There are no posterior processes of the premaxillary;
thus the line of fusion with the nasals and septo-maxillaries is broad. The
[Pg_283]
nasal plate is more than twice as long as wide. The nasals are relatively flat
above, although each curves slightly downward medially and fuses into the
medial nasal septum; laterally each nasal is narrower and deflected downward,
forming a small dorsal shield over the nasal cavity. The septo-maxillaries
are closely associated with the vomers and form the cavity in which the organ
of Jacobson is situated. The broad medial part of the septo-maxillary forms
the roof and anterior border of the cavity, whereas the anterior part of the
vomer contains the main part of the capsule and forms the posterior and most
of the lateral borders of the cavity. The vomer has a thin anterior ridge that
gradually disappears before it reaches the border of the premaxillary. The
vomer is approximately U-shaped, when viewed from below. It has no
posterior process and does not articulate with the parasphenoid; there is a
sizeable gap between the two bones. The septo-maxillary has a lateral process
that terminally is directed slightly anteriorly.


Fig. 6. The skull, lacking dentigerous bones,
of Conophis lineatus concolor (UMMZ S-788) showing (A) dorsal,
(B) lateral, and (C) ventral views. × 3.

[Pg_284]
Cranium and associated elements.—The frontal is almost three times as
long as it is wide; it is flat above with an emarginate dorsolateral margin that
forms the upper limit of the optic capsule. Ventrally the frontal is concave
and forms the median limits of the optic cavity. Farther ventrally the frontal
joins with the parasphenoid, which at this place forms the ventral extent of
the skull, and together with the basisphenoid forms the ventral part of the
posterior three-fourths of the skull. In ventral aspect, the parasphenoid is a
long, thin bone, slightly expanded anteriorly. It forms the anterior floor of
the optic foramen; whereas the frontal forms the anterior roof of the same
opening. The frontal and its septo-maxillary process surround the olfactory
fenestra. The prefrontal articulates with the anterolateral process of the
frontal. The posterior surface of the prefrontal forms the anterior wall of the
orbit of the eye. The articulating surface upon which the median process of
the maxillary bone rests is situated ventrally. The anterior dorsal surface of
the prefrontal, together with the anterolateral edge of the frontal, extends
slightly over the nasal cavity, affording some degree of protection for the
contained organs and forming the posterior border of the cavity. A small
nasal process also extends anteriorly from the ventrolateral surface of the
prefrontal. The orbital-nasalis foramen is located in the anterior surface of
the prefrontal. The parietals are fused into one large bone that forms the
roof and sides of the middle part of the cranial cavity. From its suture with
the frontal, the dorsal surface of the parietal is relatively flat in the area
bounded laterally by the parietal crests, which extend posteromedially from
the anterolateral corners of the bone and converge medially at a point near
its posterior margin. A slight posterior extension of the parietal crests forms
the supratemporal crest, which is present on the posterior part of the parietal
and on the anterior part of the supraoccipital. The postfrontals are attached
to the anterolateral processes of the parietal. Together the anterior surfaces
of these two bones form the posterior rim of the orbit of the eye. The postfrontal
extends laterally and ventrally and has a terminal extension that
projects anterolaterally. In an articulated skull the trans-palatine articulates
with the ventrolateral articulating surface of the postfrontal. Anteromedially,
the parietal forms the roof and posterior margin of the optic foramen. The
basisphenoid, which is fused with the parasphenoid, also forms a small part
of the posteroventral margin of the optic foramen. The basisphenoid forms
the floor of the middle part of the cranial cavity and the ventromedial down-pouching
that contains the pituitary body. Posterolateral to the parietal and
dorsal to the posterior part of the basisphenoid is the prootic. Laterally this
bone is deeply emarginate; posteriorly it forms a large part of the otic notch,
through which the columella passes. The columella is a long, thin bony rod
that terminates posteriorly in cartilage. It is the cartilagenous part of the
columella that connects with the external sound detecting mechanism. There
are several foramina on the lateral surface of the prootic. On the anterolateral
surface of the prootic, branches of the trigeminal nerve pass through three
foramina whereas the facial nerve passes through the single posterior foramen
[Pg_285]
near the otic notch. The squamosal is attached dorsoventrally to the posterior
part of the parietal and to the lateral part of the prootic. At this place of
attachment there is on the prootic a relatively heavy crest that forms a
rather broad articulating base. The squamosal is long, flat, and curves slightly
in a dorsal direction throughout its length; it becomes thinner and narrower
posteriorly. The posterior third of the squamosal forms a broad base by
means of which the squamosal articulates with the quadrate. The columella
and the squamosal extend posteriorly beyond the limits of the braincase.
Posteriorly the skull consists of four bones: an unpaired median dorsal supraoccipital,
an unpaired median ventral basioccipital and two lateral exoccipitals.
The basioccipital does not have noticeable pterygoid processes, but is rather
smooth ventrally and only slightly emarginate on its posterolateral margins.
Posteriorly, this bone forms the ventral part of the occipital condyle. The
rest of the condyle, on each side, is formed by the exoccipitals. The exoccipitals
also form part of the base to which the squamosal is attached. The
exoccipitals extend around the sides of the foramen magnum and meet dorsally.
Each exoccipital also forms the posterior part of the otic notch, which traverses
the exoccipital. The exoccipitals bear moderate occipital crests that extend
[Pg_286]
posterolaterally across the supraoccipital as branches from the supratemporal
crest. The supraoccipital also has a medial crest that extends a short distance
posteriorly from the supratemporal crest onto the exoccipitals at their dorsal
line of fusion.


Fig. 7. The maxillo-palatal-pterygoid arch of
Conophis lineatus concolor (UMMZ S-788) showing (A) dorsal, (B) lateral,
and (C) ventral views. × 3. Teeth shown by means of broken
lines were represented only by their sockets.

Maxillo-palatal-pterygoid arch.—In an articulated skull, the anterior edge
of the maxillary is immediately posterior to the lateral tip of the premaxillary
(fig. 7). The maxillary is curved moderately laterally and is not robust at its
tip, but it becomes heavier about one-third of its length posteriorly. A
dorsomedian process begins at about one-third of its distance from the anterior
end; the prefrontal articulates with this process. The process is broad and
almost flat, except that at its medial end, an elongate, rounded knob extends
ventrally. The dorsomedian process of the maxillary extends toward, but
does not meet, a lateral process from the palatine. The maxillary teeth are
set in sockets on the ventral surface of the bone. Just posterior to the
level of the last prediastemal tooth is the median trans-palatine process that
articulates with the anteromedian part of the trans-palatine. Immediately
posterior to this process, the maxillary narrows slightly; then it broadens to
form an obliquely oriented knob. The posteroventral surface of the posterior
knob of the maxillary bears one or two enlarged maxillary teeth. (These
teeth are discussed further in the section on Dentition.) The anterolateral
part of the trans-palatine articulates with the dorsal surface of the posterior
knob of the maxillary. Toward the middle of its length, the trans-palatine
narrows considerably; then it broadens again and articulates with the
pterygoid. The palatine is slightly rounded at its anterior end, which extends
anteriorly to the posterior margin of the vacuity containing Jacobson’s organ.
The palatine extends posteriorly to the trans-palatine process of the maxilla,
where the palatine articulates with the pterygoid. A posterior pterygoid
process from the palatine projects posteromedially from the end of the palatine
and overlaps the anterior end of the pterygoid. Just less than one-half the
distance from the anterior end of the palatine, there is a lateral process that
curves ventrolaterally forming a blunt tip posteriorly. Slightly more posteriorly
and on the medial side of the palatine, is a medial sphenoid process,
which is thin, rather broad, and curves ventromedially; ultimately it comes
to lie near the anterior part of the parasphenoid. The palatine teeth are
set in shallow sockets on the ventral edge of the bone. Of the bones of the
maxillo-palatal-pterygoid arch, those on the pterygoid extend farthest posteriorly.
The pterygoid is broad medially and posteriorly, although pointed
at its posterior tip. The trans-palatine articulates in a broad line at about
one-third of the distance along the lateral margin of the pterygoid. Immediately
posterior to this articulation, there is a median ridge on the pterygoid;
lateral to the pterygoid ridge is an abrupt hollow, the pterygoid groove.
Posteromedially, this groove becomes gradually more shallow and disappears.
The dorsal surface of the pterygoid is rounded anteriorly and somewhat
flattened posteriorly, whereas the ventral surface is gently rounded along its
length, except that there is a high median crest. The pterygoid teeth are
situated in shallow sockets along this crest. The teeth diminish in size
posteriorly.


Fig. 8. The left mandible and associated quadrate
of Conophis lineatus concolor (UMMZ S-788) showing (A) lateral and
(B) medial views. × 3. Teeth shown by means of broken lines
were represented only by their sockets.

Mandible.—The dentary (fig. 8) is compressed laterally and rounded below.
The teeth, which are longest about one-third of the way from the
anterior end of the dentary, are set in sockets on the medial side of the bone.
[Pg_287]
The posterior half of the dentary overlies the fused surangular-prearticular part
of the articular. Ventrally, the posterior part of the dentary underlies the
splenial, which is set in a median trench within the dentary. Near the common
suture of the dentary and the splenial is the large inferior alveolar
foramen; completely within the splenial and ventral to the inferior alveolar
foramen is the anterior mylohyoid foramen. Posterior to the splenial and also
forming a part of the ventral surface of the mandible is the wedge-shaped
angular, which lies directly beneath the fused surangular-prearticular. As has
been implied, the articular, the surangular, and the prearticular are fused.
The prearticular part of this bone forms a part of Meckel’s canal. In the
surangular part, immediately posterior to the end of the dentary, is the large
surangular foramen. Lying in a longitudinal axis along the medial surface of
the articular is a high crest, dorsal to which is a deep hollow. The lateral
wall of the articular above this hollow is thin and rounded dorsally; the ventral
surface is uniformly round and slightly curved dorsally, except that it ends
with a short tympanic crest, which projects beyond the articulation with the
quadrate. Where the quadrate articulates with the dorsolateral surface of the
posterior portion of the squamosal, the former is broad and has a high mid-lateral
crest, which extends about one-third of the distance down the quadrate
before disappearing. The columellar process (the place of fusion of the
[Pg_288]
columella) is about two-thirds of the way down the medial surface of the
quadrate. Ventrally the quadrate has a narrow neck dorsal to its articulation
with the articular. The articulation is formed by two lateral flanges of the
quadrate that fit over a medial ridge formed by the articular.


Dentition

Teeth on the maxillary and pterygoid decrease in size posteriorly, whereas
those of the dentary do likewise except for the first one or two that are
usually slightly smaller than those immediately posterior. The palatine teeth
are subequal in size. The enlarged, grooved teeth on the maxillary are in
shallow sockets on the posteroventral surface of the posterior knob of the
maxillary. These teeth point posteriorly. The grooves are deep and are
situated anterolaterally. One or two enlarged grooved teeth are present on
a given maxillary. There seems to be a correlation between the type of preservation,
the age of the snake, and the number of grooved teeth. Old (large)
individuals always have only one grooved tooth that is rooted and functional,
whereas some of the younger animals have two in place. Usually replacement
teeth are present in alcoholic specimens, but these unrooted teeth are lost
in the preparation of dried skeletons. Thus, it seems that in Conophis only
one pair of grooved teeth is functional at any one time, although usually replacement
teeth are present behind and beside the functional one. Some
specimens have one tooth in the medial socket on one side and one in the
lateral socket on the other. Replacement teeth on the maxillary and dentary
are present in the buccal tissue on the medial side of the bones, whereas
on the palatines and pterygoids, the replacement teeth are present laterally.
Apparently there are no significant differences in dentition among the members
of the genus Conophis.


Vertebrae

The fiftieth vertebra of Conophis vittatus (UMMZ 82642) can be described
as follows: The neural spine is elongate, thin and low; the posterior edge is
sharply emarginate, and the anterior edge is only slightly emarginate. The
zygosphene is thin dorsoventrally; in a ventral or dorsal view the zygosphene
has a slightly concave anterior edge, the flat surface of which is oriented
ventrolaterally. The centrum is elongate and triangular from below; it is
widest at the paradiapophyses and narrowest at the short condylar neck. The
condylus is directed posteriorly. The centrum, when viewed laterally, is
slightly concave and has prominent subcentral ridges that extend from the
median side of the paradiapophysial articular surfaces posteriorly to the neck
of the condylus. The paradiapophysial articular surfaces are well developed
and have two facets. The diapophysial surface is larger and more spherical
than the parapophysial one. The parapophysial process projects beyond the
parapophysial articular surface and is nearly even with the lip of the cotyle,
which is slightly oval. The neural arch is slightly depressed; its width is
somewhat less than the width of the cotyle. The articular surfaces of the
postzygapophyses are oval and are directed posterolaterally. There is a
strongly developed concave interzygapophysial ridge. A well-developed
accessory spine extends laterally beyond the oval articular facets of the pre-zygapophysis
and forms a slightly flattened, blunt spine. Excellent drawings
[Pg_289]
of the middle thoracic vertebra of Conophis lineatus dunni from Honduras
were published by Auffenberg (1958:6).


Hemipenes

The hemipenes of Conophis are moderately caliculate, having spines
covering the surface from the base to near the apex (fig. 9). These
spines are largest near the base and are reduced to small papillate
projections near the apex. The apex terminates in a small disc
having three to five laminae in C. vittatus and one lamina in C.
lineatus concolor
. The sulcus is bifurcate; the fork is near the
base and almost gives the appearance of two sulci on some specimens.
Distally the apices are widely separated, and the intervening space
gives the hemipenis a slightly bilobed appearance in some species
(especially C. vittatus) or a deeply bilobed appearance in others
(especially C. lineatus concolor).


Fig. 9. The everted left hemipenis of
Conophis vittatus (UMMZ 82650). × 5.

The everted hemipenis reaches
posteriorly to the eighth subcaudal
scale. The sulcus bifurcates at the
third subcaudal scale. The situation
is similar in situ (Cope, 1895:pl. 28,
fig. 2).

There are no apparent hemipenial
differences among the species of the
genus Conophis. As can be seen in
the above description, the hemipenis
of C. vittatus is less bilobed and has a
more pronounced disc at the apex than
the others. The hemipenis of C. lineatus concolor is most bilobed, but has
the smallest apical disc. The other species and subspecies vary widely within
these extremes.


Food and Feeding

Conophis eats mostly small lizards, especially Cnemidophorus.
In México Conophis occurs in semi-arid habitat where Cnemidophorus
is common. A specimen each of Conophis vittatus and
C. lineatus lineatus were obtained while I was collecting Cnemidophorus.
The only record of Conophis having fed on a warm-blooded
vertebrate was obtained in the course of this study, when
I recovered from the stomach of a Conophis lineatus concolor
(CNHM 36299) from Chichén Itzá, Yucatán, a heteromyid rodent
(Heteromys gaumeri).

[Pg_290]
Ralph Axtell (personal communication) observed Conophis actively
searching for food at dusk. His observations were made near
Tehuantepec, Oaxaca, and the snakes were seen to chase lizards
of the genus Cnemidophorus. Near Alvarado, Veracruz, in the late
afternoon, I watched a Conophis lineatus lineatus follow a lizard
into a hole.

Mittleman (1944:122) presents the only discussion of the mode
of feeding of a captive specimen of Conophis lineatus ssp. When
presented with a Thamnophis slightly smaller than itself, the
Conophis struck, and within eight minutes immobilized the
Thamnophis. Within one-half hour the Thamnophis was swallowed.
Three days later the Conophis ate another Thamnophis,
though still distended from its first meal; nine days later it ate a
Storeria. In the course of several months, the Conophis ate various
toads and hylids and two more Storeria. Apparently members of
the genus Conophis do not constrict their prey, but rely upon a
combination of loss of blood and action of the venom to completely
immobilize their prey.

Ditmars (1931:pls. 26-27) showed three photographs of “Conophis
lineatus
” (actually Conophis pulcher) ingesting another snake,
identified by him as a young Ophis (= Xenodon) colubrinus.


Effect of Poison

The rear fangs of these snakes are large for the size of the snake.
Various collectors have been bitten, and several reports of the
effect of the poison have been published. The snakes are aggressive
and bite constantly while being handled. A field companion, Dale
L. Hoyt, was bitten on the forefinger by a specimen of C. l. lineatus
and immediately felt a burning sensation. The finger swelled, much
as it would if stung by a wasp, but it returned to normal size in
about twenty-four hours. Ditmars (1931:legend pl. 27) reported
immediate burning pain and a localized swelling, an inch in
diameter and half an inch high, which lasted for several hours.
Mertens (1952b:83) reported merely that the hand of the gardener
at the Instituto Tropical in San Salvador bled strongly for a full
hour. Edward H. Taylor was bitten by a specimen of Conophis
vittatus
(Taylor and Smith, 1939:252); pain and swelling lasted
for some time. Taylor (personal communication) is still troubled
by damage incurred by that bite, which apparently resulted in
mechanical damage to the second joint of the middle finger, for
the joint swells when the finger is used or exercised. William E.
Duellman (personal communication) was bitten on the hand in July,
[Pg_291]
1956. There was immediate pain and localized swelling, both of
which disappeared several hours later.


TAXONOMIC RELATIONSHIPS AND EVOLUTION

The genus Conophis is known only from the Recent. Except
that Conophis belongs to the subfamily xenodontinae and probably
is of New World origin, little is known about the relationships
of the genus. Auffenberg (1958) described a new genus and
species of fossil colubrid snake from the Miocene of Montana as
Dryinoides oxyrhachis and compared it with several recent genera.
This specimen, of which there is a relatively complete skull and a
series of vertebrae, seems most closely to resemble a specimen of
Conophis lineatus dunni (UF 7657) from Honduras, with which it
was compared in basic osteology. The two genera could be related,
for the progenitors of Conophis possibly inhabited much of North
America in the Miocene.

Another possibility is that the main stock of the xenodontines
reached South America in earliest Tertiary times, and that the
formation of the Panamanian and Colombian seaways that separated
South America and Central America from the Late Paleocene to the
middle of the Pliocene left the Conophis stock isolated in Middle
America where members of the genus dispersed through semi-arid
habitats.

Turning our attention now to the species within the genus,
instead of the genus as a whole, Conophis vittatus is readily set
apart from other members of the genus on the basis of the universal
presence of seven supralabials. In basic coloration it also differs,
having no stripe on the 1st scale-row, or spots on the venter, and
a maximum of four broad stripes on the body. The other species
appear to be more closely related; these make up the C. lineatus-group.
Conophis nevermanni differs so much from the other species
that it might be placed in a separate group. Nevertheless, the basic
striped pattern, which is masked by the increased melanism of
many specimens, indicates that nevermanni is more closely related
to the lineatus-group than to vittatus. The lineatus-group, thus,
consists of pulcher, nevermanni and the three subspecies of lineatus.
In this group the color pattern is characterized by the high frequency
of ventral spotting, darkening of part of the supralabials,
dark pigmentation on the 1st scale-row, and more than four dark
stripes on the body of adults. Conophis lineatus concolor, on
which the dark pigmentation on the body apparently is secondarily
lost, is an exception.

[Pg_292]
If differences in color pattern be used as an indication of the
relationships between the species and subspecies of the genus
Conophis, I would consider C. vittatus the most divergent unit. The
subspecies of lineatus closely resemble one another and, as a unit,
resemble pulcher from which they differ
primarily in the position
of the dorsalmost stripes. Conophis nevermanni is more divergent
than is pulcher from the species lineatus, but probably is not so far
removed from lineatus as is vittatus.

In the light of what has been pointed out immediately above
with respect to resemblances of, and differences between, the species,
an hypothesis to account for their formation and for their presence
in the areas where they are today is the following: Concurrent
with climatic fluctuations in the Late Pliocene and Pleistocene,
the northernmost population differentiated into the species vittatus,
and has subsequently spread north and west from the region of
Tehuantepec, México. During the same period nevermanni became
isolated in northern Costa Rica.

The species pulcher probably differentiated from the remaining
lineatus stock during the Early Pleistocene orogenic upheaval in
Guatemala. The pulcher stock was isolated on the Pacific Coastal
slopes of Guatemala, while lineatus moved through the subhumid
corridor of northern Middle America into México and southward
toward Costa Rica (Stuart, 1954a). In the Late Pleistocene and
Recent, pulcher moved back across the central Guatemalan highlands
occupying its present range in northern Middle America.
Primarily because of the formation of unsuitable habitat (wet forest)
that presently separates the geographic ranges of populations
of lineatus, this species differentiated into three subspecies.


SUMMARY

The genus Conophis Peters, 1860, contains four species. Three
are monotypic and the fourth has three subspecies, making a total
of six taxa.

The genus is characterized by maxillary teeth of equal size followed
by a diastema and two enlarged grooved fangs. The scales
are smooth, in 19 rows at mid-body, and 17 nearer the tail. The
anal is divided, apical pits are lacking, the head shields are normal
for a colubrid, and the hemipenis is bilobed having many large
basal spines.

The six taxa are separated primarily on the basis of color pattern,
but characters of scutellation, including numbers of dorsals, ventrals,
[Pg_293]
caudals, and places of reduction of the number of dorsal
scale-rows, were analyzed.

Snakes of this genus are distributed throughout semi-arid environments
from southern México southward into Costa Rica. They
feed upon lizards, primarily of the genus Cnemidophorus; in addition
they are known to eat small rodents and other snakes.

Conophis is a member of the subfamily Xenodontinae and, as
presently understood, has no known living close relatives. A single
specimen of Dryinoides from the Miocene of Montana has been
compared with this genus. The genus Conophis is thought to have
evolved in Middle America. The present distribution and differentiation
probably are primarily the result of climatic fluctuations
in Middle America, which produced the areas of subhumid environment
where Conophis presently lives.


LITERATURE CITED

Auffenberg, W.
1958. A new genus of colubrid snake from the Upper Miocene of North
America. Amer. Mus. Novitates, 1874:1-16. February 27.

Cope, E. D.
1861. Contributions to the ophiology of Lower California, México and
Central America. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 13:292-306.
December 28.
1867. Fifth contribution to the herpetology of tropical America. Proc.
Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 18:317-323. February 20.
1871. Ninth contribution to the herpetology of tropical America. Proc.
Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 23(2):200-224. October 24.
1876. On the batrachia and reptilia of Costa Rica. Journ. Acad. Nat.
Sci. Philadelphia, series 2, 8(4):93-154, 6 pls.
1895. The classification of the ophidia. Trans. Amer. Philos. Soc.,
18:186-219, 33 pls. April 15.
1900. The crocodilians, lizards, and snakes of North America. Ann. Rept.
U. S. Natl. Mus. for 1898, pp. 153-1270, 36 pls.

Ditmars, R. L.
1931. Snakes of the World. New York, The MacMillan Company, 1931.
xi + 207 pp., 84 pls.

Dowling, H. G.
1951. A proposed standard system of counting ventrals in snakes. British
Journ. Herpetology, 1(5):97-99, fig. 1.

Duellman, W. E.
1958. A preliminary analysis of the herpetofauna of Colima, Mexico.
Occas. Papers Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan, 589:1-22, March 21.

Duméril, A. M. C., Bibron, G., and Duméril, A. H. A.
1854. Érpétologie genérale, ou histoire naturelle des reptiles. Paris, 7(pt.
2):xii + 785. February 25. Atlas, 24 pp., 108 pls.

Duméril, A. H. A., Bocourt, M., and Mocquard, F.
1870-1909. Mission Scientifique au Mexique et dans l’Amerique Centrale
… Etudes sur les Reptiles. Paris, vol. 2:xiv + 1012 pp.,
77 pls.

Garman, S.
1884a. The North American reptiles and batrachians. Bull. Essex Inst.,
16:1-46. January 9.

[Pg_294]

1884b. The reptiles and batrachians of North America. Mem. Mus.
Comp. Zool., 8(3):xxxi + 185 pp., 9 pls. July.

Günther, A. C. L. G.
1858. Catalogue of colubrine snakes in the collection of the British
Museum. London. xiv + 281 pp.

Huxley, J.
1942. Evolution. The Modern Synthesis. London. 645 pp.

Jan, G. and Sordelli, F.
1866. Iconographie Generale des Ophidiens. Milano. livr. 19, pls. 1-6.
December.
1881. Iconographie Generale des Ophidiens. Milano. livr. 50, pls. 1-7.
November.

Mayr, E.
1942. Systematics and the Origin of Species. New York, x + 334 pp.,
29 figs.

Mayr, E., Linsley, E. G., and Usinger, R. L.
1953. Methods and Principles of Systematic Zoology. New York.
ix + 328 pp., 45 figs.

Mertens, R.
1952a. Neues uber die Reptilienfauna von El Salvador. Zool. Anz.,
148:87-93. February.
1952b. Die Amphibien und Reptilien von El Salvador auf grund der
reisen von R. Mertens und A. Zilch. Abhand. Senken. Naturw.
Gesell., 487:83, 1 Kart., 16 taf. December 1.

Mittleman, M. B.
1944. Feeding habits of a Central American opisthoglyph snake. Copeia,
no. 2:122. June 30.

Neill, W. T. and Allen, R.
1961. Further studies on the herpetology of British Honduras. Herpetologica,
17(1):37-52. April 15.

Parker, W. K.
1878. On the structure and development of the skull in the common
snake (Tropidonotus natrix). Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, pt. 2:385-417,
pp., pls. 27-33.

Peters, W.
1860. Drei neue amerikanisches Schlangen. Monatsb. Akad. Wiss. Berlin,
1860:517-521, pl., fig. 3. October.

Radovanovic, M.
1937. Osteologie des Schlangenkopfs. Jenaische Zeitschr. Naturw.,
71(2):179-312.

Savage, J. M.
1949. Notes on the Central American snake, Conophis lineatus dunni
Smith, with a record from Honduras. Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci.,
50:483-486. December 31.

Schmidt, K. P.
1928. Reptiles collected in Salvador for the California Institute of Technology.
Zool. Ser. Field Mus. Nat. Hist., 12(16):193-201. November 21.

Schmidt, K. P. and Inger, R. F.
1957. Living Reptiles of the World. Garden City, New York, Hanover
House. 287 pp.

Smith, H. M.
1941. Notes on snakes of the genus Conophis. Journ. Washington Acad.
Sci., 31(3):117-124. March 15.

Smith, H. M. and Taylor, E. H.
1950. Type localities of Méxican reptiles and amphibians. Univ. Kansas
Sci. Bull., 33:313-380. March 20.

[Pg_295]

Stuart, L. C.
1948. The amphibians and reptiles of Alta Verapaz, Guatemala. Misc.
Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan, 69:1-109. June 12.
1954a. A description of a subhumid corridor across northern Central
America, with comments on its herpetofaunal indicators. Contr.
Lab. Vert. Biol. Univ. Michigan, 65:1-26 pp., 6 pls. March.
1954b. Herpetofauna of the southeast highlands of Guatemala. Contr.
Lab. Vert. Biol. Univ. Michigan, 68:1-65 pp., 3 pls. November.

Szunyoghy, J.
1932. Beitrage zur vergleichenden Formenlehre des Colubridenschadels,
nebst einer Kraniologischen Synopsis der fossilen Schlangen Ungarns.
Acta Zool., 13:1-56.

Taylor, E. H.
1955. Additions to the known herpetological fauna of Costa Rica with
comments on other species. No. II. Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull.,
37:299-575. October 15.

Taylor, E. H. and Smith, H. M.
1939. Miscellaneous notes on Mexican snakes. Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull.,
25:239-258. July 10.

Wettstein, O.
1934. Ergibnisse der osterreichischen biologischen Costa Rica—Expedition
1930. Die Amphibia und Reptilien. Stiz. Akad. Wiss. Wien,
mathem-naturw. kl., Abt. 1, bd. 143:1-39.

Transmitted November 30, 1962.


29-5936

[Pg_i]


UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS PUBLICATIONS
MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY

Institutional libraries interested in publications exchange may obtain this
series by addressing the Exchange Librarian, University of Kansas Library,
Lawrence, Kansas. Copies for individuals, persons working in a particular
field of study, may be obtained by addressing instead the Museum of Natural
History, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas. There is no provision for
sale of this series by the University Library, which meets institutional requests,
or by the Museum of Natural History, which meets the requests of individuals.
However, when individuals request copies from the Museum, 25 cents should
be included, for each separate number that is 100 pages or more in length, for
the purpose of defraying the costs of wrapping and mailing.

* An asterisk designates those numbers of which the Museum’s supply (not the Library’s
supply) is exhausted. Numbers published to date, in this series, are as follows:

Vol. 1.Nos. 1-26 and index. Pp. 1-638, 1946-1950.
*Vol. 2.(Complete) Mammals of Washington. By Walter W. Dalquest. Pp. 1-444, 140
figures in text. April 9, 1948.
Vol. 3.*1.The avifauna of Micronesia, its origin, evolution, and distribution. By Rollin
H. Baker. Pp. 1-359, 16 figures in text. June 12, 1951.
 *2.A quantitative study of the nocturnal migration of birds. By George H.
Lowery, Jr. Pp. 361-472, 47 figures in text. June 29, 1951.
 3.Phylogeny of the waxwings and allied birds. By M. Dale Arvey. Pp. 473-530,
530, 49 figures in text, 13 tables. October 10. 1951.
 *4.Birds from the state of Veracruz, Mexico. By George H. Lowery, Jr., and
Walter W. Dalquest. Pp. 531-649, 7 figures in text, 2 tables. October 10,
1951.
 Index. Pp. 651-681.
*Vol. 4.(Complete) American weasels. By E. Raymond Hall. Pp. 1-466, 41 plates, 31
figures in text. December 27, 1951.
Vol. 5.Nos. 1-37 and index. Pp. 1-676, 1951-1953.
*Vol. 6.(Complete) Mammals of Utah, taxonomy and distribution. By Stephen D.
Durrant. Pp. 1-549, 91 figures in text, 30 tables. August 10, 1952.
Vol. 7.Nos. 1-15 and index. Pp. 1-651, 1952-1955.
Vol. 8.Nos. 1-10 and index. Pp. 1-675, 1954-1956.
Vol. 9.*1.Speciation of the wandering shrew. By James S. Findley. Pp. 1-68, 18
figures in text. December 10, 1955.
 2.Additional records and extension of ranges of mammals from Utah. By
Stephen D. Durrant, M. Raymond Lee, and Richard M. Hansen. Pp. 69-80.
December 10, 1955.
 3.A new long-eared myotis (Myotis evotis) from northeastern Mexico. By Rollin
H. Baker and Howard J. Stains. Pp. 81-84. December 10, 1955.
 4.Subspeciation in the meadow mouse, Microtus pennsylvanicus, in Wyoming.
By Sydney Anderson. Pp. 85-104, 2 figures in text. May 10, 1956.
 5.The condylarth genus Ellipsodon. By Robert W. Wilson. Pp. 105-116, 6
figures in text. May 19, 1956.
 6.Additional remains of the multituberculate genus Eucosmodon. By Robert
W. Wilson. Pp. 117-123, 10 figures in text. May 19, 1956.
 7.Mammals of Coahulia, Mexico. By Rollin H. Baker. Pp. 125-335, 75 figures
in text. June 15, 1956.
 8.Comments on the taxonomic status of Apodemus peninsulae, with description
of a new subspecies from North China. By J. Knox Jones, Jr. Pp. 337-346,
1 figure in text, 1 table. August 15, 1956.
 9.Extensions of known ranges of Mexican bats. By Sydney Anderson. Pp.
347-351. August 15, 1956.
 10.A new bat (Genus Leptonycteris) from Coahulia. By Howard J. Stains.
Pp. 353-356. January 21, 1957.
 11.A new species of pocket gopher (Genus Pappogeomys) from Jalisco, Mexico.
By Robert J. Russell. Pp. 357-361. January 21, 1957.
 12.Geographic variation in the pocket gopher, Thomomys bottae, in Colorado.
By Phillip M. Youngman. Pp. 363-384,
7 figures in text. February 21, 1958.
 13.New bog lemming (genus Synaptomys) from Nebraska. By J. Knox Jones,
Jr. Pp. 385-388. May 12, 1958.
 14.Pleistocene bats from San Josecito Cave, Nuevo León, México. By J. Knox
Jones, Jr. Pp. 389-396. December 19, 1958.
 15.New subspecies of the rodent Baiomys from Central America. By Robert
L. Packard. Pp. 397-404. December 19, 1958.
 16.Mammals of the Grand Mesa, Colorado. By Sydney Anderson. Pp. 405-414,
1 figure in text, May 20, 1959.
 17.Distribution, variation, and relationships of the montane vole, Microtus montanus.
By Sydney Anderson. Pp. 415-511, 12 figures in text, 2 tables.
August 1, 1959.
 18.Conspecificity of two pocket mice, Perognathus goldmani and P. artus. By
E. Raymond Hall and Marilyn Bailey Ogilvie. Pp. 513-518, 1 map, January 14, 1960.
[Pg_ii]
 19.Records of harvest mice, Reithrodontomys, from Central America, with description
of a new subspecies from Nicaragua. By Sydney Anderson and
J. Knox Jones, Jr. Pp. 519-529. January 14, 1960.
 20.Small carnivores from San Josecito Cave (Pleistocene), Nuevo León, México.
By E. Raymond Hall. Pp. 531-538, 1 figure in text. January 14, 1960.
 21.Pleistocene pocket gophers from San Josecito Cave, Nuevo León, México.
By Robert J. Russell. Pp. 539-548, 1 figure in text. January 14, 1960.
 22.Review of the insectivores of Korea. By J. Knox Jones, Jr., and David H.
Johnson. Pp. 549-578. February 23, 1960.
 23.Speciation and evolution of the pygmy mice, genus Baimoys. By Robert L.
Packard. Pp. 579-670, 4 plates, 12 figures in text. June 16, 1960.
 Index. Pp. 671-690
Vol. 10.1.Studies of birds killed in nocturnal migration. By Harrison B. Tordoff and
Robert M. Mengel. Pp. 1-44, 6 figures in text, 2 tables. September 12, 1956.
 2.Comparative breeding behavior of Ammospiza caudacuta and A. maritima.
By Glen E. Woolfenden. Pp. 45-75, 6 plates, 1 figure. December 20, 1956.
 3.The forest habitat of the University of Kansas Natural History Reservation.
By Henry S. Fitch and Ronald R. McGregor. Pp. 77-127, 2 plates, 7 figures
in text, 4 tables. December 31, 1956.
 4.Aspects of reproduction and development in the prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster).
By Henry S. Fitch. Pp. 129-161, 8 figures in text, 4 tables. December
19, 1957.
 5.Birds found on the Arctic slope of northern Alaska. By James W. Bee.
Pp. 163-211, plates 9-10, 1 figure in text. March 12, 1958.
 *6.The wood rats of Colorado: distribution and ecology. By Robert B. Finley,
Jr. Pp. 213-552, 34 plates, 8 figures in text, 35 tables. November 7, 1958.
 7.Home ranges and movements of the eastern cottontail in Kansas. By Donald
W. Janes. Pp. 553-572, 4 plates, 3 figures in text. May 4, 1959.
 8.Natural history of the salamander, Aneides hardyi. By Richard F. Johnston
and Gerhard A. Schad. Pp. 573-585. October 8, 1959.
 9.A new subspecies of lizard, Cnemidophorus sacki, from Michoacán, México.
By William E. Duellman. Pp. 587-598, 2 figures in text. May 2, 1960.
 10.A taxonomic study of the middle American snake, Pituophis deppei. By
William E. Duellman. Pp. 599-610. 1 plate, 1 figure in text. May 2, 1960.
 Index. Pp. 611-626.
Vol. 11.Nos. 1-10 and index. Pp. 1-703, 1958-1960.
Vol. 12.1.Functional morphology of three bats: Sumops, Myotis, Macrotus. By Terry
A. Vaughan. Pp. 1-153, 4 plates, 24 figures in text. July 8, 1959.
 *2.The ancestry of modern Amphibia: a review of the evidence. By Theodore
H. Eaton, Jr. Pp. 155-180, 10 figures in text. July 10, 1959.
 3.The baculum in microtine rodents. By Sydney Anderson. Pp. 181-216, 49
figures in text. February 19, 1960.
 *4.A new order of fishlike Amphibia from the Pennsylvanian of Kansas. By
Theodore H. Eaton, Jr., and Peggy Lou Stewart. Pp. 217-240, 12 figures in
text. May 2, 1960.
 5.Natural history of the bell vireo. By Jon C. Barlow. Pp. 241-296, 6 figures
in text. March 7, 1962.
 6.Two new pelycosaurs from the lower Permian of Oklahoma. By Richard C.
Fox. Pp. 297-307, 6 figures in text. May 21, 1962.
 7.Vertebrates from the barrier island of Tamaulipas, México. By Robert K.
Selander, Richard F. Johnston, B. J. Wilks, and Gerald G. Raun. Pp. 309-345,
pls. 5-8. June 18, 1962.
 8.Teeth of Edestid sharks. By Theodore H. Eaton, Jr. Pp. 347-362, 10 figures
in text. October 1, 1962.
 More numbers will appear in volume 12.
Vol. 13.1.Five natural hybrid combinations in minnows (Cyprinidae). By Frank B.
Cross and W. L. Minckley. Pp. 1-18. June 1, 1960.
 2.A distributional study of the amphibians of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec,
México. By William E. Duellman. Pp. 19-72, pls. 1-8, 3 figures in text.
August 16, 1960.
 3.A new subspecies of the slider turtle (Pseudemys scripta) from Coahulia,
México. By John M. Legler. Pp. 73-84, pls. 9-12, 3 figures in text. August
16, 1960.
 4.Autecology of the copperhead. By Henry S. Fitch. Pp. 85-288, pls. 13-20,
26 figures in text. November 30, 1960.
 5.Occurrence of the garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis, in the Great Plains and
Rocky Mountains. By Henry S. Fitch and T. Paul Maslin. Pp. 289-308,
4 figures in text. February 10, 1961.
 6.Fishes of the Wakarusa river in Kansas. By James E. Deacon and Artie L.
Metcalf. Pp. 309-322, 1 figure in text. February 10, 1961.
 7.Geographic variation in the North American cyprinid fish, Hybopsis gracilis.
By Leonard J. Olund and Frank B. Cross. Pp. 323-348, pls. 21-24, 2 figures
in text. February 10, 1961.
[Pg_iii]
 8.Descriptions
of two species of frogs, genus Ptychohyla; studies of American
hylid frogs, V. By William E. Duellman. Pp. 349-357, pl. 25, 2 figures
in text. April 27, 1961.
 9.Fish populations, following a drought, in the Neosho and Marais des Cygnes
rivers of Kansas. By James Everett Deacon. Pp. 359-427, pls. 26-30, 3 figs.
August 11, 1961.
 10.Recent soft-shelled turtles of North America (family Trionychidae). By
Robert G. Webb. Pp. 429-611, pls. 31-54, 24 figures in text. February
16, 1962.
 Index. Pp. 613-624.
Vol. 14.1.Neotropical bats from western México. By Sydney Anderson. Pp. 1-8.
October 24, 1960.
 2.Geographic variation in the harvest mouse. Reithrodontomys megalotis, on
the central Great Plains and in adjacent regions. By J. Knox Jones, Jr.,
and B. Mursaloglu. Pp. 9-27, 1 figure in text. July 24, 1961.
 3.Mammals of Mesa Verde National Park, Colorado. By Sydney Anderson.
Pp. 29-67, pls. 1 and 2, 3 figures in text. July 24, 1961.
 4.A new subspecies of the black myotis (bat) from eastern Mexico. By E.
Raymond Hall and
Ticul Alvarez. Pp. 69-72, 1 figure in text. December 29, 1961.
 5.North American yellow bats, “Dasypterus,” and a list of the named kinds
of the genus Lasiurus Gray. By E. Raymond Hall and J. Knox Jones, Jr.
Pp. 73-98, 4 figures in text. December 29, 1961.
 6.Natural history of the brush mouse (Peromyscus boylii) in Kansas with
description of a new subspecies. By Charles A. Long. Pp. 99-111, 1 figure
in text. December 29, 1961.
 7.Taxonomic status of some mice of the Peromyscus boylii group in eastern
Mexico, with description of a new subspecies. By Ticul Alvarez. Pp. 113-120,
1 figure in text. December 29, 1961.
 8.A new subspecies of ground squirrel (Spermophilus spilosoma) from Tamaulipas,
Mexico. By Ticul Alvarez. Pp. 121-124. March 7, 1962.
 9.Taxonomic status of the free-tailed bat, Tadarida yucatanica Miller. By J.
Knox Jones, Jr., and Ticul Alvarez. Pp. 125-133, 1 figure in text. March 7,
1962.
 10.A new doglike carnivore, genus Cynaretus, from the Clarendonian Pliocene,
of Texas. By E. Raymond Hall and Walter W. Dalquest. Pp. 135-138,
2 figures in text. April 30, 1962.
 11.A new subspecies of wood rat (Neotoma) from northeastern Mexico. By
Ticul Alvarez. Pp. 139-143. April 30, 1962.
 12.Noteworthy mammals from Sinaloa, Mexico. By J. Knox Jones, Jr., Ticul
Alvarez, and M. Raymond Lee. Pp. 145-159, 1 figure in text. May 18,
1962.
 13.A new bat (Myotis) from Mexico. By E. Raymond Hall. Pp. 161-164,
1 figure in text. May 21, 1962.
 14.The mammals of Veracruz. By E. Raymond Hall
and Walter W. Dalquest.
Pp. 165-362, 2 figures. May 20, 1963.
 15.The recent mammals of Tamaulipas, México. By Ticul Alvarez. Pp. 363-473,
5 figures in text. May 20, 1963.
 More numbers will appear in volume 14.
Vol. 15.1.The amphibians and reptiles of Michoacán, México. By William E. Duellman.
Pp. 1-148, pls. 1-6, 11 figures in text. December 20, 1961.
 2.Some reptiles and amphibians from Korea. By Robert G. Webb, J. Knox
Jones, Jr., and George W. Byers. Pp. 149-173. January 31, 1962.
 3.A new species of frog (Genus Tomodactylus) from western México. By
Robert G. Webb. Pp. 175-181, 1 figure in text. March 7, 1962.
 4.Type specimens of amphibians and reptiles in the Museum of Natural History,
the University of Kansas. By William E. Duellman and Barbara Berg.
Pp. 183-204. October 26, 1962.
 5.Amphibians and Reptiles of the Rainforests of Southern El Petén, Guatemala.
By William E. Duellman. Pp. 205-249, pls. 7-10, 6 figures in text. October
4, 1963.
 6.A revision of snakes of the genus Conophis (Family Colubridae, from Middle
America). By John Wellman. Pp. 251-295, 9 figures in text. October 4,
1963.
 More numbers will appear in volume 15.

Transcriber’s Notes

For consistancy, a number of word which had alternate spellings were
altered to match the most prevalent version used. For example, where
the word Mexico was used in the body of the article, the more frequent
spelling (México) was substituted. However, in the reference sections,
the spelling was not altered as that may have been the spelling used
by the article’s author. All occurrances of Érpétologie Genérale were
correcteded to Erpétologie Générale (Pp. 255,
262, 267,
277, and 278).

On page 279 under Variation there appears to be a miscalculation:

668 mm. + 182 mm. = 850 mm. not
840 as in original text.
Typographical Corrections

Page    Correction
264    immaculaate ⇒ immaculate
264    chacteristic ⇒ characteristic
266    elevatons ⇒ elevations
267    Dumeril ⇒ Duméril
277    Duméil ⇒ Duméril
279    Tehauntepec ⇒ Tehuantepec
280    Deleted repeated “Oaxaca,”
292    primarly ⇒ primarily
295    hertetofaunal ⇒ herpetofaunal
i     V. 9 No. 12 – Pp. 363-387 ⇒ Pp. 363-384
iii    V. 13 No.  8 – Decriptions ⇒ Descriptions
iii    V. 14 No.  8 – anad ⇒ and
iii    V. 14 No. 14 – anad ⇒ and

Scroll to Top